Columbia Connections FIRE AND ICE SCENIC LOOP. Newsletter of the Southwest Section of the Washington Chapter of the American Planning Association

Similar documents
National Scenic Byways Program US Department of Transportation

Strengthening the Ontario Trails Strategy. Report on Consultations and the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry

Rogue River Access and Management Plan Draft Alternatives

The Future of the Road to Revolutions. A Battle Road Scenic Byway Public Forum November 9, 2010

3.0 LEARNING FROM CHATHAM-KENT S CITIZENS

Chapter 1: Introduction Draft

Section II. Planning & Public Process Planning for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail began in 2010 as a City of Minnetrista initiative.

COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Chapter 1: Introduction

MT. H O O D & T H E G O R G E T O U R I S M L I S T E N I N G S E S S I O N O V E R V I E W

WHITE PASS SCENIC BYWAY CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE 2014 WHITE PASS SCENIC BYWAY CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN UPDATE

JOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012

10/25/2013. What is the SCORP?! 2013 Local Government Survey 2013 Statewide Public Survey Advisory Group Priority Areas Your Suggestions!

AAPA 2017 COMMUNICATION AWARDS CATEGORY: OVERALL CAMPAIGN

The presentation was approximately 25 minutes The presentation is part of Working Group Meeting 3

Gold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter twelve Social impact. Chapter content

Resort Municipality Initiative Annual Report 2015

Project Description. Connect Cascade Locks: A Recreational Trails Plan for Economic Development. Introduction

Proposal to Redevelop Lower Kananaskis River-Barrier Lake. Bow Valley Provincial Park

Strategic Plan. Manassas Battlefield Trust

Proposal to Redevelop Lower Kananaskis River-Barrier Lake. Bow Valley Provincial Park. Frequently Asked Questions

2015 General Trail User Survey February 2016

2014 NOVEMBER ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND VISITOR PROFILE. Prepared By:

ANNUAL BUSINESS PLAN

4.0 Context for the Crossing Project

Stronger Economies Together

National Park Service Wilderness Action Plan

FNORTHWEST ARKANSAS WESTERN BELTWAY FEASIBILITY STUDY

13.1 REGIONAL TOURISM ISSUES AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

2016 Regional Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Grant Application

Appalachian Trail Community

FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands

Ministry of Parks, Culture and Sport. Plan for saskatchewan.ca

MEETING CONCLUSIONS. Andean South America Regional Meeting Lima, Peru 5-7 March ECOTOURISM PLANNING

Wilderness Stewardship Plan Scoping Newsletter Winter 2013

The Vision for the San Juan Islands Scenic Byway

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Fort Collins, CO

CONTACT: Chuck Cullom Ted Cooke Report on Opportunity to Participate in Colorado River Museum Display

AGENDA ITEM 5 D WAKULLA ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE (WEI) TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY

2014 STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN

Appendix D Dispersed/Displaced Recreation Visitor Survey Results

Northern Rockies District Value of Tourism Research Project December 2007

Trail # NW Tuesday, June DESIGN. Provide an Review the Provide an. Project Goals: System system. wayfinding

Outdoor Adventures Department of Recreational Sports Spring 2017

Blueways: Rivers, lakes, or streams with public access for recreation that includes fishing, nature observation, and opportunities for boating.

The results of the National Tourism Development Strategy Assessments

PROPOSED PARK ALTERNATIVES

RE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan, Preliminary Ideas and Concepts

Establishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014.

Chapter 6: POLICY AND PROCEDURE RECOMMENDATIONS

OREGON TOURISM LISTENING SESSION SUM M ARY

MONROE CONVENTION CENTER EXPANSION UPDATE

Motion: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Motion: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Carried: Defeated: Referred to:

CHAPTER ONE LITERATURE REVIEW

SUMMER QUARTERLY MEETING JULY 21, Tri-State Trails is made possible by the generous support of Interact for Health.

Chapter 1 Introduction and Project Overview

Region of Waterloo Planning, Development and Legislative Services Region of Waterloo International Airport Office of Economic Development

Signature Travel Expert Certification Course

Chapter 1 Introduction and Project Overview

This section of the Plan provides a general overview of the Smoky Mountain Region. It consists of the following four subsections:

TWO NIGHT AGENDA. Wednesday Oct Big Ideas, Big Goals Who wants to eat the cake?

FY19 Colorado Tourism Office Marketing Matching Grant Recipients

CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Cascade River State Park Management Plan Amendment

2013 Business & Legislative Session Visitor Satisfaction Survey Results

IATOS 2003 Outdoor Enthusiast Survey CTC Market Research March, 2003

TOURISM PLAN

Harvey Field Airport. Planning Advisory Committee & Public Open House. April 1, Comment Responses

The Economic Contributions of Agritourism in New Jersey

Draft Executive Summary

Final General Management Plan/Wilderness Study/Environmental Impact Statement:

Meeting Report. Listening Session for Greenways + Blueways May 27, LaPorte County Solid Waste & Water Conservation Office, 6:00 8:00

Nova Scotia Tourism Agency Department of Economic and Rural Development and Tourism Statement of Mandate

Interview with Mr. Aaron Mahr, superintendent of the National Park Service s (NPS) National Trails, U.S.A. Route 66

Tourism: An Integral Part of a Community s Economic Development Portfolio. Michael Liffmann LSU-Sea Sea Grant College Program

Annual Member Survey. Innovation & Renewal. Sydney Michael Hughes Managing Director Research & Consulting

National Wilderness Steering Committee

GATLINBURG CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 811 East Parkway Gatlinburg, TN

Signature Travel Expert Certification Course

PORT OF SEATTLE MEMORANDUM. COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 4g ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting February 9, 2016

Mt. Hood National Forest

Creating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering

!" # $ % & % ' ( '' ) ) ) ) )

LAKE APOPKA NORTH SHORE ECO TOURISM. Strategic Action Plan 4/10/2014

Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road

POVERTY REDUCTION THROUGH COMMUNITY-BASED TOURISM IN VIET NAM: A CASE STUDY

DRAFT Appendix A Appendix B. Planning Process & Public Participation

CAUSE FOR CELEBRATION!

Kelly Motorized Trails Project Proposed Action

Draft General Management Plan/Wilderness Study/Environmental Impact Statement

Montana Wilderness Association v. McAllister, 666 F.3d 549 (9th Cir. 2011). Matt Jennings I. INTRODUCTION

Trail Town Program Creating Opportunities along the Nation s Trails. David Kahley President & CEO The Progress Fund

Business Growth (as of mid 2002)

MINNEAPOLIS TOURISM MASTER PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING AUGUST 24, 2016

MINNESOTA S PARKS & TRAILS LEGACY PROGRAM: ACCOMPLISHMENTS & PROSPECTS

Special Events Internal or External

Greene County Tourism Economic Impact Analysis and Strategic Goals

TONGASS NATIONAL FOREST

Aitkin County Comprehensive Recrea5on Trail Plan. May 2010

MRO 2017 Stakeholder Survey

Transcription:

1 Columbia Connections Mt. St. Helens, photos by Vivian FIRE AND ICE SCENIC LOOP Sam Rubin, Community Development Planner/GIS, CWCOG and Lisa Brosnan, Former Economic Development Planner, CWCOG Thirty-five years after the dramatic eruption of Mount St. Helens, the Cowlitz-Wahkiakum Council of Governments will release a much-anticipated corridor management plan for the Fire and Ice Scenic Loop, identified in 2009 by the Mount St. Helens Advisory Committee as a key opportunity to expand tourism opportunities and promote economic development in the region s communities. The plan is a blueprint for the establishment, promotion, and management of a scenic loop that interprets the region s geological, historical, and cultural history. Today, Mount St. Helens serves as a scenic, scientific, and recreational destination for visitors from all over the world. The intent of the plan is to capitalize on the interest already shown in the region by recommending improvements in visitor services and focusing the efforts of regional partners to showcase the area s rich beauty and its educational and recreational offerings while honoring its natural and cultural heritage. What is a Corridor Management Plan? According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a corridor management plan is a written document that specifies the actions, procedures, controls, operational practices, and administrative strategies necessary to maintain the scenic, historic, recreational, cultural, archaeological, and natural qualities of a scenic byway. A corridor management plan identifies the boundaries of a plan area. It lists and describes the intrinsic qualities found within those boundaries (the archaeological, cultural, historic, natural, recreational, and scenic qualities that make it unique) and it proposes ways to protect and enhance these qualities. The plan also gives direction for how a corridor should be managed and promoted. Fire And Ice Scenic Loop Sam Rubin and Lisa Brosnan, below Surveying? Lessons Learned Ben Shumaker, page 3 APA National Conference Sarah Fox, page 4 8th Annual Gutterball Classic Sarah Fox, page 5 Growth Management Act page 6 The FHWA lists 14 distinct points that must be included in a corridor management plan. They are as basic as a map and as far-reaching as an inventory of roads, recommendations for their improvement, and strategies to minimize unsightly views and limit outdoor advertising. The plan should also include ideas for interpreting and marketing the corridor s significant resources. Geography The Fire and Ice Scenic Loop is located in Southwest Washington. The region includes the Mount St. Helens Monument, the Washington side of the Columbia Gorge, the Gifford Pinchot National Forest and Mount Rainier National Forest, and the White Pass Scenic Byway. The loop includes state routes 503 and 504, which run eastwest on the north and south edges of Cowlitz County. The 250-mile Fire and Ice Scenic Loop incorporates three established scenic byways: Lewis and Clark State Scenic Byway (SR 14) that traverses Clark and Skamania counties along the Columbia River Spirit Lake Memorial Highway (SR 504), a Washington State Scenic Byway and a US Forest Service Scenic Byway White Pass National Scenic Byway (US 12) between Mary s Corner and Naches in Lewis County Vision and Purpose The vision established for the Fire and Ice Scenic Loop calls on regional tourism-related partners in Skamania, Lewis, and Cowlitz counties to encourage the economic opportunities presented by the Mount St. Helens National Monument in Southwest Washington by creating, promoting, and enhancing the loop. con t pg. 2 WINTER 2015/2016 Board Members President Amanda Smeller President-Elect Sarah Fox Secretary Erin Erdman Treasurer Larry Vasquez Clark County Gary Albrecht Cowlitz County Sam Rubin Skamania County Ben Shumaker Education Coordinator Sarah Fox Professional Development Matt Hermen Communications Don Hardy Legislative Liaison Brian Carrico Southwest Section of the Washington State Chapter of the American Planning Association washington-apa.org Newsletter layout and editing provided by BergerABAM abam.com

2 The Fire and Ice Scenic Loop Bridge located in Southwest Washington. The Fire and Ice Scenic Loop corridor management plan is intended to help the region benefit from the economic development that the loop would bring through increased tourism by identifying, conserving, and enhancing the rich natural and cultural resources found throughout the plan area. Support for the plan would provide the appropriate transportation agencies and funders with a clear statement about the region s desire to protect and maintain its character. Also, the plan would give engineers and designers the reference point they need to provide flexibility in designing roads, bridges, and safety projects. Goals Goals identified by the Fire and Ice Scenic Loop Steering Committee include: Increase the length of stay along designated routes Enhance user experience and safety Identify current and additional road and site locations to provide visitors with expanded recreational opportunities Identify tourism opportunities to expand seasonal recreation, services for visitors, tourism infrastructure, and marketing Develop shared priorities and a long-term partnership to coordinate economic development and tourism opportunities for the region Examine and pursue funding opportunities for recommended investments Promote the educational enjoyment of the region through the experience of cultural, historical, and natural amenities Recommendations To establish recommendations for the Fire and Ice Scenic Loop, the Cowlitz-Wahkiakum Council of Governments (CWCOG) worked with three technical teams representing the functional areas of transportation, tourism and marketing, and culture, history, and outdoor recreation. The transportation team focused mainly on the improvements needed to maintain the safety of the roads in anticipation of increased usage. The team also made a significant distinction between the state routes, which are well maintained with few safety concerns, and primitive roads, which are only minimally maintained and should be marketed to the type of tourist who desires a more natural and secluded setting. Marketing the loop to target audiences was the main concern of the tourism and marketing team. This team also explored the ways in which the loop could be governed, concluding that a public/private partnership would be the ideal structure to acquire funding, implement projects, and organize volunteer efforts. The culture, history, and outdoor recreation team identified and prioritized the region s features and addressed the knotty question of how to encourage more access to them while protecting them from the potentially negative effects of increased access. Benefits Area agencies responsible for roadways can use the Fire and Ice Scenic Loop corridor management plan to help choose roadway improvements that will enhance the region s visitor experience. Future projects will strengthen connections between the existing byways and improve access to sites near the gateway communities of the monument, opening more of our region to visitors. The development of the loop will benefit visitors by providing access to regional scenic sites and the continued commitment by stakeholders will promote the region by elevating and expanding tourism activities and infrastructure. Expanding the quality and number of tourism sites will increase visitor interest, providing the opportunity for a greater range of activities. The initial benefits to be realized by the average visitor will likely involve the marketing materials created to promote the region. An official website, mobile phone apps, newsletters, and brochures will entice visitors to explore parts of the region they may not have previously considered for lack of information. In turn, this increased activity would translate to higher profits for local business owners as well as an increased need for safety and capacity building measures along the roads. Expected improvements along the Fire and Ice Scenic Loop include coordinated signage, guardrails, new and enhanced intersections, and other safety measures. The Fire and Ice Scenic Loop corridor management plan calls for the establishment of a governing structure that includes the public and private sectors with representation from across the region. Implementing the projects included in the plan will require obtaining grants, and establishing a structure to coordinate activities. con t pg. 5

SURVEYING? LESSONS LEARNED Ben Shumaker, City of Stevenson My, oh, my, what a world we live in! Twenty-first century technological improvements like the internet and online banking have opened up new economic doors. Visitors arrive in our towns by foot, horseback, bike, motorcycle, car, boat, ship, ATV, and stand-up paddleboard. Things are looking up for our region, and, with its growing popularity, more and more property owners and prospective buyers are looking for ways to welcome guests into their homes and supplement their incomes. Like so many other communities, Stevenson has heard encouragement from supporters of these new economic opportunities and concerns from neighbors worried about their impacts. Facilitate or regulate? Keeping an open mind, the City of Stevenson Planning Commission wanted to take this issue to the people. This article describes the questionnaire used at the outset of the public involvement effort. Because each community s response will be different, the article does not dwell on Stevenson respondents perspective, but focuses on the lessons the Planning Department staff learned. The most important? Don t be afraid to upgrade. Questionnaire Protocols and Outreach Methods Instead of paper, we used www.surveymonkey.com for our overnight lodging questionnaire and posted a link on the City website; emails went directly to individuals currently providing overnight lodging, individuals recently inquiring about overnight lodging, and realtors. The local paper, chamber of commerce, and economic development agency partnered with the City and were asked to share the news of the questionnaire s availability with their contacts or on their Facebook pages. Responses to the questionnaire were accepted for only a month; the initial email went out on the first of the month and a reminder email on the 27th. Nearly half of the responses came within the first week; responses tapered off over the next three weeks, with a small spike triggered by the reminder email. Multiple responses from the same IP address were not allowed; for confidentiality, IP addresses were not collected or reported to the staff administering the questionnaire. Respondents were not required to answer any question before advancing to the next, and all questions allowed them to check multiple answers. Scope The nine-item questionnaire was divided into three pages: the respondent as a guest, as a neighbor, and as a proprietor. The questions focused on six types of overnight lodging: Bed & Breakfasts, Hiker/Youth Hostels, Hotel/Motels, RV Camping, Tent Camping, and Vacation Rental Homes. Explanations were provided for Bed & Breakfasts, Hiker/Youth Hostels, and Vacation Rental Homes, but the other categories were undefined. The questions asked: 1. Please describe how you have used overnight lodging in your own travels, including how the lodging was reserved. 2. What type of neighborhood surrounded the overnight lodging where you stayed? 3. In your overnight lodging stays, did you contribute to any of the following neighborhood economic benefits? 4. In your overnight lodging stays, did you contribute to any of the following neighborhood disruptions? 5. Are you aware of having lived near any of the following overnight lodging at any time in the past? 6. If so, did you feel the guests of that business contributed any of the following economic benefits? 7. If so, did you feel the guests of that business contributed any of the following neighborhood disruptions? 8. Which areas in Stevenson are best suited for new overnight accommodations? 9. Final question: Would you consider providing any of the following types of overnight lodging on your property? These questions attempted to remove a respondent s potential bias by asking the same question in multiple ways. As part of the staff report to the Planning Commission, the answers to questions 1, 5, and 9 were aggregated to provide an indicator of demand. The answers to questions 2 and 8 were combined as an indicator of future desire. The answers to questions 3 and 6 and 4 and 7 were combined as indicators of the foreseeable consequences of overnight lodging. Questions 1, 2, 5, 8, and 9 used SurveyMonkey s matrix/rating scale format, while the remainder were multiple choice. Because no questions were open-ended, each question had an Other option to allow respondents to express themselves and overcome some of the limitations of the questionnaire s design. Lessons Learned We care about this stuff. Stevenson has a population of 1,520, and 114 people (7.5 percent) cared enough about this topic in this area to respond; the public response afterward revealed many more who would ve liked to have responded if they had only known about the survey. The meteoric growth of companies like Airbnb, and Portland s attempts to regulate the rapidly changing industry, have been well publicized, and interest in the topic has focused our community s discussions on vacation rentals. We see both excitement and apprehension about hosting overnight guests in our homes and neighborhods, and the Planning Commission s decision to conduct broader outreach on this topic has helped our community members discuss their conflicting views. con t pg. 4 3

4 Surveying? Lessons Learned, con t A whole new world? Not so fast. The Sharing Economy has been used to describe companies like Airbnb, Craigslist, and EBay that allow peer-to-peer commerce outside the usual corporate structure. While many Millennials and tech-savvy Baby Boomers operate comfortably in this new world, others are uncomfortable with the technology and with the lack of clarity over its potential impacts. While Stevenson s decision to use SurveyMonkey was conscious and celebrated technological ease, not everyone agreed. We suspect we inadvertently disenfranchised those most likely to be concerned about the new realities of the Sharing Economy. A more robust effort to generate community awareness of the questionnaire, and a decision to make paper-based forms available, would have avoided this unfortunate result. Keep it simple, staff. A questionnaire is only as good as the questions asked, and one of our questions seemed to be a barrier. The question asked about the type of overnight lodging available in the respondent s neighborhood and what type of booking the lodging employed. The answering comments showed respondents frustration, as did the drop-off in responses to the four questions that followed. The two errors that plagued this question could have been avoided. First, the question was too detailed we tried to do too many things with one question. APA NATIONAL CONFERENCE, SEATTLE April 18 21, 2015 Sarah Fox, City of Camas As a native Washingtonian, the event made me proud for several reasons. First, it was sunny and warm, which is uncharacteristic of Seattle at almost any time of year. Second, the event drew the second-largest number of attendees in the event s history. The last national conference that I attended, in Las Vegas in 2008, was the most attended conference to date. I am only slightly suggesting that there is a connection between my attendance at a conference and its subsequent high popularity. You re welcome, Seattle. Aside from the amazing weather and the attendance, the other highlights of the conference included the quality and number of sessions, the Tech Zone, and the many evening events. Too many sessions looked interesting for the available time. Thankfully, most are now available online at the national website to all APA members. Of the sessions that I attended, these were my top three: Did UGB s Work in Oregon The presentation began with a comparison between UGBs and Oz. The presentation included how the Oregon policies affected SW Washington. WebCode Toolkit The City of Los Angeles is about to launch an online zoning code that is personalized for each user. The program is scheduled to be available as Open Source in September 2015, meaning that smaller jurisdictions could use this program at low upstart costs. Content-Neutral Sign Regulations after Reed v. Gilbert New case law that could once again require changes to local sign codes. And, finally, I was bewildered every night as to which group I would join, given there would be an award dinner, an alumni event, and a social hour for those that identified with a specific group, such as county planners---all happening simultaneously, at equally stunning locations. In summary, thank you, Seattle, for such a well-organized and worthwhile conference. Don t be afraid to upgrade. The #1 new lesson we learned is: Upgrade your account. The free account allows only 10 questions. If your questionnaire includes explanatory text or closing words of appreciation, they count as questions so you must ask fewer real questions or overcomplicate questions to get the answers you seek. We did both, and our questionnaire suffered because of it. The free account also allows access to only 100 responses. If your outreach effort is popular, you will have to upgrade before viewing any additional responses. Also, the free account allows only limited analysis tools and no skip logic to remove irrelevant questions based on each respondent s answers. In the end, upgrading our account proved inevitable, and waiting to do so until the collection phase meant that we missed out on the opportunity to obtain more data in a way that would ve been less frustrating for respondents. For more information, please contact: Sarah Fox, City of Camas SFox@cityofcamas.us 360-817-1568 Please don t make the same mistakes, but do feel free to contact me: ben@ci.stevenson.wa.us 509-427-5970.

8th Annual Gutterball Classic Sarah Fox, City of Camas Six teams came to battle it out for the golden pin at the 8th Annual Gutterball Classic on Thursday night, May 14, 2015 at Big Al s in Vancouver. A few guests didn t even bowl, but came by just for the entertainment and added to the good turnout. The Gutterball Classic includes pizza, beer, and soda for everyone who attends, with sponsorship dollars provided by BergerABAM and the Directors teams. The Directors Team won the Golden Trophy for the second time, while the best costume award went to the City of Vancouver team they re definitely the teams to beat in 2016! Fire and Ice Senic Loop, con t Conclusion Through the creation and implementation of the Fire and Ice Scenic Loop corridor management plan, the region s tourism profile will rise through the expansion of collaborative efforts already established and through the creation of new opportunities. Tourism-based entities will benefit from a multifaceted marketing campaign, incorporating coordinated signage, websites, and branding. Business owners and other stakeholders of the region will realize an economic boost generated by an increase in visitors. Tourists will benefit from strategies designed to make travel easier and more interesting. The public comment period for the final document concluded on May 3, 2015. The Fire and Ice Scenic Loop Steering Committee and the Cowlitz-Wahkiakum Council of Governments greatly appreciate all of the input received. For more information, please contact: Matt Buchanan or Sam Rubin 360-577-3041 www.cwcog.org/fireice Cowlitz-Wahkiakum Council of Governments Those of us who are regulars at this fun event encourage you to join us next year. Also, send me your ideas for the 9th Annual Gutterball Classic. Maybe teams with members from more than one organization? Or bowling with the bumpers up, or with the bowler s non-dominant hand? Send in all your ideas and let s keep having fun! CELEBRATING 25 YEARS! Washington s Growth Management Act (GMA) was adopted in 1990 by a coalition of dedicated state legislators and citizen groups that were determined to do something about the rapid, unplanned, disconnected, and unsustainable growth that took place in our state during the 1970s and 80s. The 25th anniversary of this game-changing legislation presents an opportunity to evaluate the impact of GMA, applaud our successes and leaders, and ask ourselves some tough questions: How well have we achieved the goals of GMA? What could we have done differently? What are the success stories? It is also an opportunity to look forward to the next 25 years and discuss the challenges ahead climate change, public health, social equity and what changes are needed now for us to successfully address them. Hear from GMA Founders and Current Leaders in Washington. Then join the leaders of our profession for dinner and beverages as we celebrate some of the very best projects and plans! To learn more about this event visit: https://apawa.memberclicks.net/gma-25th-anniversary-event 5