RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 P-1 Line #35

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 10 P-1 Line #47

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED United States Special Operations Command Page 1 of 6 P-1 Line #53

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 24 P-1 Line #55

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2015 FY 2015 OCO. FY 2015 Base FY 2015 FY Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Communication, Navigation, Surveillance/Air Traffic Management (CNS/ATM) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 P-1 Line #55

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2014 Base. OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Page 1 of 5. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-5

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 18 P-1 Line #12

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 17 P-1 Line #121

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 16 P-1 Line #57

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 23 P-1 Line #27

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2015 FY 2015 OCO. FY 2015 Base FY 2015 FY Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

ROYAL CANADIAN AIR CADETS PROFICIENCY LEVEL ONE INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE SECTION 6 EO C IDENTIFY INTERNATIONAL AIRCRAFT PREPARATION

UNCLASSIFIED FY Exhibits Schedule Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY 2015 OCO FY 2015 Total. Total Cost ($ M)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 P-1 Line #15

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 17 P-1 Line #55

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED FY Exhibits Schedule Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY 2015 OCO FY 2015 Total. Total Cost ($ M) Unit Cost ($) Qty (Each)

July 29-30, 2010 Washington, D.C Procurement Agencies. Coast Guard Agencies

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 21 P-1 Line #19

Federal Aviation Administration FAA ACADEMY FAA A CAD Federal Aviation Federal Aviation Administration Administration FAA Academy Mission Location

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 18 P-1 Line #56

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 P-1 Line #21

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization

Air Force Test Center 96 TW

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 31 P-1 Line #41

NASA Low Boom Flight Demonstration (LBFD) Project Overview

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2014 Base. OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Review of USAFA UAS Research

UNCLASSIFIED FY Exhibits Schedule Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY 2015 OCO FY 2015 Total. Total Cost ($ M) Unit Cost ($) Qty (Each)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 33 P-1 Line #94

Avionics CyberThreat. Airplanes Are Hard!

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 30 P-1 Line #36

AE 452 Aeronautical Engineering Design II Cost of an Airplane. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering April 2017

AE 452 Aeronautical Engineering Design II Cost Analysis. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

The Green Airplane and Cyber

Global Investor Forum Airbus. Fabrice Brégier Chief Executive Officer Airbus. Page 1

UNCLASSIFIED FY Exhibits Schedule Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY 2015 OCO FY 2015 Total. Unit Cost ($ M) Qty (Each)

Overview of NASA Aeronautics. Jaiwon Shin Associate Administrator Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate April 21, 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

P. Hendrick*, K. Bourdiaudhy** & J-F. Herbiet** *Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), **Royal Military School of Belgium

Aeronautics & Air Transport in FP7

UAS Symposium Key Research Challenges and Opportunities

Global Civil Aviation & Military Simulation & Training Market( ) Trends & Opportunities

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 34 P-1 Line #51

Report to Congress Aviation Security Aircraft Hardening Program

REPOSITIONING HAI WITHIN THE GLOBAL MARKET

Federal Aviation Administration Portfolio for Safety Research and Development. Seminar Paul Krois October, 2008

RADA Electronic Industries Ltd. (Nasdaq: RADA) March 2019

USAF Airworthiness Policy and Process Updates

PROGRAMME STATUS PROGRAMME STATUS

Investor Presentation

Airspace Establishment Project Frequently Asked Questions Permanent SUA and Environmental Assessment March 2019

EMBARGOED FOR 5AM ET JUNE 5, 2017 PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP S PRINCIPLES FOR REFORMING THE U.S. AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM.

Aeronautics & Air Transport in FP7. DG RTD-H.3 - Aeronautics Brussels, January 2007

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Operators may need to retrofit their airplanes to ensure existing fleets are properly equipped for RNP operations. aero quarterly qtr_04 11

Chairman and Trustees of the Oklahoma City Economic Development Trust

Appendix. Gatwick Airport Ltd - Further information on Gatwick s revised phasing strategy (including Programme) Gatwick Airport Limited

AEROSPACE & ELECTRONICS

1. Material terms of the major related-party transaction (a series of interrelated transactions).

D8ULTRA-EFFICIENT COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT

Part 63 CAA Consolidation 22 June 2006 Flight Engineer Licences and Ratings

NASA s Role in Integration of UAVs

D_HO_V ER1 GL_ P03 GL_6030

Job Title Location Company MACHINIST, MAINTENANCE Eglin AFB, FL Reliance Test & Technology ELECTRONICS TECHNICIAN, MAINTENANCE II (F&I) Eglin AFB, FL

Aircraft Design Project Memorandum

Communications and Information Technology Alert

_VER1 CC_ PC_5000 FA_21500 C </CELL ><CELL> HO_ADJ 2015.P02 GL_6290 _VER1 GL_6010 PC_5000 FA_21500 C

Post 816 News Nayak Aviation Corporation San Antonio, Texas December, 2004

SACAL COMPANY PROFILE

City Council Report. Mayor and City Council Susan Cline, Director, Public Works, Civil Engineering

PERFORMANCE REPORT JANUARY Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager

PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2009 Session

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 151 P-1 Line #32

D8ULTRA-EFFICIENT COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT

Unique Challenges of Unmanned Air Systems (UASs) Test and Evaluation

Transcription:

PE NUMBER: 0604239F PE TITLE: F-22 EMD BUDGET ACTIVITY COST ($ In Thousands) Actual FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 Cost to Complete Cost Advanced Tactical Fighter FSD 2,010,717 1,570,970 1,222,232 976,601 712,491 318,470 0 22,628,536* Quantity of RDT&E Articles 1 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 Unit cost of RDT&E articles not separately priced (NSP). * Cost includes $3,779,811,000 of Demonstration and Validation funding prior to FY 1992 funded in PE 0603230F. ** Quantity of RDT&E Articles includes one EMD flight test aircraft delivered in FY 1997. (U) A. Mission Description The F-22 is designed to penetrate enemy airspace and achieve a first look, first kill capability against multiple targets. The F-22 is characterized by a low observable, highly maneuverable airframe, advanced integrated avionics, and aerodynamic performance that allows supersonic cruise without the use of afterburner. The F-22 is currently in the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) phase of acquisition. Additionally, long lead production funding has been released for the two Production Representative Test Vehicle (PRTV) aircraft in. The EMD phase effort includes delivery of nine flight test vehicles and two ground test vehicles (static and fatigue); delivery of 26 flight qualified engines; integration and test of the EMD avionics suite including air-to-surface provision; development and test of the F-22 weapons system support and training system; and updating the YF-22 Avionics Flying Laboratory with EMD assets and software to become an avionics integration Flying Test Bed (FTB). All OSD-level and 1998 congressional program criteria for F-22 flight test completed successfully ahead of schedule. The flight test criteria for PRTV full contract award were completed on 10 Oct 98, the software criteria for PRTV full contract awards were completed on 23 Nov 98. One hundred eighty-three (183) flight test hours were completed by 23 Nov 1998 this allowed the Air Force to award the Lot-1 advanced buy contract on 30 Dec 98. A successful review by the Defense Acquisition Executive was held on 17 Dec 98. The DAE authorized PRTV full contract award and authorized Lot-1 Advanced Buy contract award following release of SECRETARY OF DEFENSE/DIRECTOR OPERATIONAL TEST and EVALUATION Reports to Congress. Project Page 1 of 11 Pages Exhibit R-2 (PE 0604239F) 696

(U) ($ in Thousands): (U) $1,185,714Air Vehicle - Completed assembly of Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) aircraft #2. (NSP) - Continued assembly of EMD aircraft #3. (NSP) - Initiated assembly of EMD aircraft #4-6. (NSP) - Continued systems installations on Flying Test Bed (FTB) (NSP) - Continued full scale pole model testing (NSP) - Continued flight test and flight test support (NSP) (U) $525,691Avionics - Initiated Avionics Integration Laboratory (AIL) Block 1 integration (NSP) - Continued incorporating Avionics hardware into the FTB (NSP) - Continued DMS redesign activities for production incorporation (NSP) - Initiated FTB flight testing. (NSP) (U) $206,612Engine - Continued production engine configuration development testing (NSP) - Continued to deliver and support two additional flight test engines (7 total) (NSP) - Continued verification of engine support system products (NSP) - Continued to build and test additional flight test engines (NSP) (U) $92,700Other Government Cost - Initiated flight test and flight test support at Edwards AFB - Continued support of engine testing - Continued stores separation testing at Arnold Engineering Development Center - Continued sled test program at Holloman AFB - Continued aperture measurements at Rome Labs - Continued avionics ground testing at various government test facilities - Mission support of the SPO; travel, computer costs, misc contracts, etc. - Procurement of required government furnished equipment (GFE) - Continued Live Fire testing at Air Force Research Labs (U) $2,010,717 Project Page 2 of 11 PagesExhibit R-2 (PE 0604239F) 697

BUDGET ACTIVITY (U) : Air Vehicle - Continue assembly of EMD aircraft #3-6. (NSP) 0604239F F-22 EMD - Initiate static test. (NSP) - Initiate fatigue tests. (NSP) (U) $473,531 - Continue flight test and flight test support (NSP) - Initiate AIL integration in preparation of Block 2 integration testing (NSP) - Initiate delivery and installation of avionics hardware on the first avionics test aircraft (NSP) - Complete (AIL) Block 1.0 integration (NSP) - Continue DMS redesign, requalification and retesting activities (NSP) Engine - Continue to deliver and support six additional flight test engines (13 total). (NSP) - Continue verification of engine support system products (NSP) - Continue building and test additional flight test engines (NSP) (U) $97,700 Other Government Cost - Continue support of engine testing - Continue aperture measurements at Rome Labs - Mission support of the SPO; travel, computer costs, misc contracts, etc. - Procurement of required GFE - Continue live fire testing at Air Force Research Labs - Continue stores separation testing at AEDC Project Exhibit R-2 (PE 0604239F) 698

(U) FY 2000 ($ in Thousands): (U) $689,694 Air Vehicle - Complete static test (NSP) - Conduct First Flight Readiness Review for aircraft #4. (NSP) - Complete assembly of EMD aircraft #3-6 (NSP) - Continue assembly of EMD aircraft #7-9 (NSP) - Complete final production readiness review (NSP) - Continue flight test and flight test support (NSP) - Complete full scale pole model testing (RCS). (NSP) - Complete first lifetime fatigue test (NSP) (U) $275,827 Avionics - First flight of the first avionics test aircraft (NSP) - Initiate AIL Block 3 integration (NSP) - Continue incorporating avionics software/hardware into the FTB (NSP) - Continue DMS redesign activities for production incorporation (NSP) - Initiate avionics software block 3S flight testing (NSP) - Initiate Block 3 FTB testing (NSP) (U) $140,111 Engine - Continue production engine configuration development testing (NSP) - Continue to deliver and support thirteen additional flight test engines (26 total) (NSP) - Continue verification of engine support system products (NSP) - Continue to build and test additional flight test engines (NSP) (U) $116,600 Other Government Cost - Continue flight test and flight test support at Edwards AFB - Continue support of engine testing at AEDC - Continue aperture measurements at Rome Labs - Continue avionics ground testing at various government facilities - Mission support of the SPO; travel, computer costs, misc contracts, etc. - Procurement of required GFE - Continue sled test program at Holloman AFB - Continue live fire testing at Air Force Research Labs (U) $1,222,232 Project Page 4 of 11 Pages Exhibit R-2 (PE 0604239F) 699

0604239F F-22 EMD (U) (U) $582,164 (U) $184,599 - Complete assembly of EMD aircraft #7-9. (NSP) - Continue flight test and flight test support. (NSP) - Initiate AIL Block 3.1 integration. (NSP) - Complete flight testing on the Block 3.1 FTB. (NSP) - Continue DMS redesign, requalification and retesting activities. (NSP) Engine - Continue production engine configuration development testing. (NSP) - Continue to build and test additional flight test engines. (NSP) Other Government Cost - Continue engine testing at AEDC - Continue avionics ground testing at various government facilities - Procurement of required GFE - Continue live fire testing at Air Force Research Labs (U) B. This program is in Activity 5, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, because the F-22 Program is developing the next-generation air superiority fighter for the USAF to counter emerging worldwide threats. Project Page 5 of 11 Pages 700

(U) C. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Cost (U) Previous President s (FY 1999 PB) 1,958,915 1,582,217 1,204,490 995,191 22,663,988 (U) Appropriated Value 2,077,234 1,575,417 (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value a. Congressional/General Reductions -68,250-4,447 b. SBIR -50,352 c. Omnibus or other Above Threshold Reprogramming 60,202 d. BTR -8,117 (U) Adjustments to Years Since FY 1999 PB 17,742-18,590 (U) Current Submit/FY 2000 PB 2,010,717 1,570,970 1,222,232 976,601 22,628,536 (U) Significant Program Changes: - The Appropriations Act transferred $73.531M from FY97 Procurement (3010) to FY97 RDT&E (3600) to support redesign activities associated with Outof-Production Parts (OPP). OSD transferred the $73.531M from FY97 RDT&E (3600) to FY98 RDT&E (3600) to ensure the Air Force maintained the full two fiscal year term to obligate the funds. - $40,000 in FY 2000 includes a payback of a cut to Air Combat Simulator and funding to support Air Combat Command Block IV requirements for IOC (Helmet-mounted sight, AIM-9X, Project 3308 and Advanced Combat ID). Project Page 6 of 11 Pages Exhibit R-2 (PE 0604239F) 701

5 - Engineering and Manufacturing Development Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2003 FY 2004 To Complete Cost (U) F-22 Squadrons (PE 0207138F) *82,953 *TBD (U) Military Construction (PE 0604239F) 0 4,388 13,410 0 0 0 **38,829 0 0 24,033 0 0 0 197,533 (U) Aircraft Procurement (PE 0207219F) 73,291 1,858,137 2,551,432 4,326,385 3,988,135 20,071,464 40,271,547 #003 (PE 0207219F) 0 1,398 2,747 6,455 9,587 58,404 92,938 0207138F includes manpower authorizations, peculiar and common support equipment, necessary facilities and the associated costs specifically identified and measurable to the following: Operation, maintenance, and logistical support of the F-22 fighter aircraft. Excludes advanced flying training operation costs and base and ** Includes 21,040 of FY 1997 & prior funds. Project Page 7 of 11 Pages Exhibit R-2 (PE 0604239F) 702

(U) E. Acquisition Strategy: The EMD contract is Cost Plus Award Fee with Lockheed Martin Aeronautical Systems (LMAS) to produce the F-22 air vehicle and Pratt & Whitney (P&W) to produce the F119 engines. The engines are provided to LMAS as GFE. (U) F. Schedule Profile FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 (U) Aircraft Delivered (EMD Test Article) * X X 2 X X X Program Milestones - Program Review, PRTV Award, Lot 1 LL - DAB MS III, 4QFY03 * Engineering Milestones - Final PRR - First Avionics Flight X X T&E Milestones - Dedicated IOT&E, 4QFY02 EMD = Engineering & Manufacturing Development, DAB = Defense Acquisition Board, LRIP = Low Rate Initial Production, LL = Long Lead, MS = Milestone, DT&E = Developmental Test & Evaluation, IOT&E = Initial Operational Test & Evaluation Project Page 8 of 11 Pages Exhibit R-2 (PE 0604239F) 703

RDT&E PROGRAM ELEMENT/ COST BREAKDOWN (R-3) 0604239F F-22 EMD (U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands) FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 (U) Air Vehicle/Avionics 1,711,405 1,300,166 965,521 766,763 (U) Engine 206,612 173,104 140,111 54,638 (U) Government Cost - Government Test - Mission Support - HAZMAT - GFE 68,600 12,500 0 11,600 78,500 11,500 1,000 6,700 99,400 11,000 800 5,400 139,200 10,700 800 4,500 (U) 2,010,717 1,570,970 1,222,232 976,601 (U) B. Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands) Performing Organizations: Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Performing Activity EAC Project Office EAC Prior to FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 to Complete Program Product Development Organizations Lockheed (Air C/CPAF Aug 91 12,816,155 15,295,391 9,825,200 1,711,405 1,300,166 965,521 766,763 739,836 15,308,891 Veh) Pratt & Whitney C/CPAF Aug 91 2,197,900 2,472,734 1,830,944 206,612 173,104 140,111 54,638 67,325 2,472,734 Project Page 9 of 11 Pages 704

BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E PROGRAM ELEMENT/ COST BREAKDOWN (R-3) Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Performing Activity EAC Project Office EAC Prior to FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 to Complete Program Support and Management Organizations Support Contracts Various Various N/A N/A 10,155 2,247 3,303 2,600 2,300 1,500 22,105 In House Support Various Various N/A N/A 72,045 10,253 9,197 9,200 9,200 17,500 127,395 Test and Evaluation Organizations AEDC PO N/A N/A *135,833 19,175 12,250 10,100 100 0 177,458 AFFTC PO N/A N/A *103,842 44,666 52,700 76,100 113,500 195,900 586,708 All Other Tests Various Various N/A N/A *26,825 4,759 13,550 13,200 25,600 8,900 92,834 Note: The Project Office EAC includes the following items not included in the Performing Activity (i.e., Contractor) EAC - Base Fee, Award Fee, SPO Planned CCPs not yet on contract, and other adjustments based on results of the restructured program. * Prior to (Actuals) for Test and Evaluation Organizations have been restated to account for bookkeeping changes across the activities. Government Furnished Property: Item Description Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Delivery Prior to FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 to Complete Program Product Development Property GFE Various Various Various 32,400 11,600 6,700 5,400 4,500 0 60,600 Support and Management Property Project Page 10 of 11 Pages Exhibit R-3 (PE 0604239F) 705

BUDGET ACTIVITY Item Description Not Applicable RDT&E PROGRAM ELEMENT/ COST BREAKDOWN (R-3) Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Delivery Prior to FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 to Complete Program Test and Evaluation Property Not Applicable Subtotal Product Development 11,656,144 1,918,017 1,473,270 1,105,632 821,401 807,161 781,625 Subtotal Support and Management 114,600 24,100 19,200 17,200 16,000 19,000 210,100 Subtotal Test and Evaluation 266,500 68,600 78,500 99,400 139,200 204,800 857,000 Project 12,037,244 2,010,717 1,570,970 1,222,232 976,601 1,030,961 *18,848,725 * Program cost does not include $3,779,811 of Demonstration and Validation funding prior to FY 1992 funded in PE 0603230F. Project Page 11 of 11 Pages Exhibit R-3 (PE 0604239F) 706