Chambers of Commerce and Lake Groups advertised this NCWRPC created online survey that was : Opened: August 22, 2012; and Closed: October 4, 2012.

Similar documents
Lincoln County ORP Survey Response Summary

2018 Oneida County Outdoor Recreation Plan (ORP) Survey Results Summary

FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands

CHAPTER 5. Chapter 5 Recreation Element

Aitkin County Comprehensive Recrea5on Trail Plan. May 2010

Restore and implement protected status that is equivalent, or better than what was lost during the mid-1990 s

PURPOSE AND NEED. Introduction

2018 Vilas County Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (CORP) Survey Results Summary

13.1 REGIONAL TOURISM ISSUES AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

Village of Taos Ski Valley 2015 Master Plan. Recreation Element

2018 Adams County Outdoor Recreation Plan (ORP) Survey Results Summary

TRAIL USER PERMIT FEE NATURAL RESOURCES, AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT INTERIM COMMITTEE

SAXON HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT SURVEY

Green Mountain Trail Collaborative Stewardship and Communication Work Group Meeting Notes June 30, 2010

Central Wasatch Visitor Use Study STEVEN W. BURR, PH.D. AND CHASE C. LAMBORN, M.S. INSTITUTE FOR OUTDOOR RECREATION AND TOURISM UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY

Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018

Rogue River Access and Management Plan Draft Alternatives

Q1 Did you know that Salt Lake City has a Trails & Natural Lands Program?

Acadia National Park. Visitor Study. The Visitor Services Project

Planning Future Directions. For BC Parks: BC Residents' Views

Silver Lake Park An Environmental Jewel for the Citizens of Prince William County

AMERICAN S PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION: Results From NSRE 2000 (With weighted data) (Round 1)

Blueways: Rivers, lakes, or streams with public access for recreation that includes fishing, nature observation, and opportunities for boating.

System Group Meeting #1. March 2014

Proposed Scotchman Peaks Wilderness Act 2016 (S.3531)

Lewis and Clark Recreation Area

APPENDIX A: Survey Instruments

MEETING MINUTES District 1 Trail Planning Meeting 1

Parks & Recreation Areas Program

Thank you for this second opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.

Subj: POLICY FOR MAINSIDE TRAIL USE AT MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO

Creating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering

Morgan Estates. Lassen County, CA. Proudly Offered By

Citrus Heights Creek Corridor Trail Project Trail Advisory Group Field Trip #2 September 11, :00 11:00 am Trellis Hall, Citrus Heights

Proposed Action. Payette National Forest Over-Snow Grooming in Valley, Adams and Idaho Counties. United States Department of Agriculture

Appendix A BC Provincial Parks System Goals

STOWER SEVEN LAKES STATE RECREATION TRAIL POLK COUNTY, WISCONSIN. MASTER PLAN June, 2018

Public Comment. Comment To consider extending State Park lands above River Mile 7.0

When One Size Doesn t Fit All Building Volunteers with a Spectrum of Opportunity

Arthur Carhart National Wilderness Training Center s Wilderness Investigations High School

Clearwater Lake Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

Securing Permanent Protection for Public Land

Vail Valley Mountain Bike Association (VVMBA) is pleased to announce that their Adopt a Trail (AAT) program has expanded! Starting last spring, Adopt

STONE MOUNTAIN PROVINCIAL PARK Purpose Statement and Zoning Plan

Township Superintendent

1987 SUMMER USE SURVEY OF MINNESOTA STATE PARK VISITORS

SOCIAL CONFLICT BETWEEN MOTORIZED AND NON-MOTORIZED RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES.

Mammoth Winter Recreation Summit Saturday March 19, 2016

Minnesota River Valley Area Survey Summary Report

FEASIBILITY CRITERIA

TRAIL DATABASE SCHEMA (8/26/2014)

Auburn Trail / Ontario Pathways Trail Connector Feasibility Study Public Information Meeting Wednesday, August 22, 2012

1987 SUMMER USE SURVEY OF MINNESOTA STATE PARK VISITORS

Department of Environment, Climate Change & Water NSW. Stakeholder feedback

Creating Content for Travellers.

Marchand Provincial Park. Management Plan

To: Cam Hooley From: Trails 2000 Date: September 30, 2016 Re: Hermosa Comments. Dear Cam:

RECREATION. Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area.

Table of Contents. page 3 Long term Goals Project Scope Project History. 4 User Groups Defined Trail Representative Committee. 5 Trail Users Breakdown

F. Forest Recreation Management

US Forest Service Bears Ears Trail - NFST 1144 California Park to Hole in Wall Creek. Good (1) 2 3

Dungeness Recreation Area County Park Master Plan

The Roots of Carrying Capacity

National Park Service Wilderness Action Plan

Auburn Trail/Ontario Pathways Trail Connector Feasibility Study Project Advisory Group Meeting August 25, 2011 Farmington Town Hall Approved Minutes

ONTARIO TRAILS COUNCIL FAQ

Coronado National Forest Santa Catalina Ranger District

Steps in the Management Planning Process

Applying Carrying Capacity Concepts in Wilderness

OPEN SPACE. The Open Space Element describes the County s goals and policies with respect to open space areas and addresses the following topics:

Tracy Ridge Shared Use Trails and Plan Amendment Project

Chapter 6: POLICY AND PROCEDURE RECOMMENDATIONS

Wilds. Headwaters. Lakes. Oxbows. Falls

Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District

Wilderness Activities : (Page 162)

Yard Creek Provincial Park. Management Plan

How should the proposed protected area be administered and managed?

Buford / New Castle Motorized Trail

2. Goals and Policies. The following are the adopted Parks and Trails Goals for Stillwater Township:

The City of Durango Community Interest and Opinion Survey Executive Summary

TOURISM & PUBLIC SERVICES RURAL SIGNAGE POLICY

Hermosa Area Preservation The Colorado Trail Foundation 4/11/2008

Chapter 6. Action Program. Heart of the Lakes Area Recreation Plan

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation December 2, 2004 COYOTE HELLYER COUNTY PARK BAY AREA RIDGE TRAIL

Niagara Natural Heritage Park

A Vision for South Skunk River and Chichaqua Bottoms Greenbelt

TAYLOR CANYON RANCH COLORADO - ROUTT COUNTY - STEAMBOAT SPRINGS

Land Use & Neighborhoods Spectacular, diverse landscape with distinct communities

Beth Lucas, Senior Planner Stephanie Brewer, Planner Broome County Planning May 12 th, 2016

WildSafeBC Annual Report 2015 Powell River Regional District

CHAPTER FOUR: TRANSPORTATION

Sasagiu Rapids Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

BILL S-210: A REASONABLE STATUTORY FRAMEWORK TO PROTECT GATINEAU PARK

2015 General Trail User Survey February 2016

How do we stack up? Conducted by: The Department of Resource Recreation & Tourism University of Idaho For the State of Idaho

Chuckanut Ridge Fairhaven Highlands EIS Scoping Concerns

Snowmobile Connectors Are Disconnected

If anyone would like to discuss either the questions, or the answers, with me, they are invited to contact me at

TWO NIGHT AGENDA. Wednesday Oct Big Ideas, Big Goals Who wants to eat the cake?

3.0 LEARNING FROM CHATHAM-KENT S CITIZENS

Transcription:

Vilas County Outdoor Recreation Survey Chambers of Commerce and Lake Groups advertised this NCWRPC created online survey that was : Opened: August 22, 202; and Closed: October 4, 202. Q What Vilas County lake do you live on or are closest to? Even if you are a seasonal resident, please write the lake that you frequently "live" near. Q2 How did you find out about this survey? Lake group contact Chamber of Commerce notice Town or City bulletin board or notification Local media (e.g. newspaper, radio, tv) Other (please specify) Q3 What are the top 3 outdoor recreational issues facing Vilas County? These issues could be a combination of strengths and desires to maintain what exists. Issue Issue 2 Issue 3 Q4 How shall the recreational issues described above in Question 3 be satisfied? Q5 What existing outdoor recreation facilities in Vilas County need improvement? Results for this survey follow

Vilas County 202 Outdoor Recreation Survey Results The Vilas County 202 Outdoor Recreation Survey was conducted by NCWRPC in the fall of 202 to identify outdoor recreation issues in Vilas County for updating the countywide outdoor recreation plan for the next five years, 204-209. Excellent participation occurred and issues were identified. This survey is not statistically accurate, because anyone could have chosen to take the survey themselves or be part of a group that submitted responses. For example: if 20 people responded the same way and a group representing 00 people voted a different way, then in these results it will look like 20 people want something and person wants something else, whereby the opposite is actually true with 00 people actually wanting something different. 2 recreational groups replied as groups (motorized, non-motorized, and lake groups), and some of these groups encouraged their members to also complete the survey. 5 surveys were mailed or emailed directly to lake group contacts on-record with the Vilas County Land & Water Department. Chambers of commerce in Vilas County also advertised the online survey link. A great response of 44 surveys were completed online and via mail. **************************************************************************************** How did you find out about this survey? 20.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% Lake group Chamber notice Town or City bulletin board or notification Local media (e.g. newspaper, radio, tv) Direct mailing Website Club Friend Other

Vilas County 202 Outdoor Recreation Survey Results Survey respondents noted how they found out about this survey in the following ways: Lake group Every organized lake group on the Vilas County Land & Water Department s mailing list was emailed or mailed a survey. Note: It is possible that lake group and direct mailing are all part of lake group. Chamber notice Every chamber of commerce in Vilas County was asked to promote this survey however they saw fit. Town or City bulletin board or notification Local governments may have posted notice of the survey on their bulletin boards. Local media A story of the survey may have prompted someone to take the survey. Direct mailing Many paper surveys were mailed directly to NCWRPC for tabulation. Most likely these completed surveys came from lake group contact people. Website A couple websites/bloggers advertised the survey on their site. Club Some participants noted that they found out about the survey from an organized recreational club. Friend Co-workers and neighbors encouraged their friends to complete the survey. Other A small number of people replied based upon a variety of reasons. ***************************************************************************************

Vilas County 202 Outdoor Recreation Survey Results What Vilas County lake do you live on or are closest to? On the image below, darkened lakes are where survey respondents lived closest to. **************************************************************************************** Top outdoor recreational issues facing Vilas County: Number of times issue was stated All Terrain Vehicles: 87 42 Issue ATVs are an issue. (NCWRPC Note: This was a general reference respondents made on the survey. No positive or negative reference could be determined from this listing.) 39 Need ATV routes or trails. 5 Silent sports alone (without ATVs) is missing the economic opportunity of having ATVs. Dirt bike access. Silent Sports (Overall): 42 5 Maintain Vilas County as a silent sport destination. 3 Keep ATVs out of Vilas County. 3 Connect recreational trails for hiking, biking, walking, birding, and snowmobiling not ATVs.

Vilas County 202 Outdoor Recreation Survey Results Focus on creating "destination" attractions that feature our natural resources and silent recreation Silent Sports (Bicycling): 28 6 Biking is an issue. 7 Need bike trails. Connect bike trails. 3 Too many bike routes on paved highways (very dangerous). Educate motorists about the rights of bicyclists. Add 5-foot paved shoulder on roads for bike/run usage. Silent Sports (Hiking): 5 5 Hiking is an issue. Jogging and walking trails needed. Need for silent sport trails and parking areas. 2 Need more wilderness trails and interpretive signs. Clear and brush back on existing hiking trails. 4 More cross country ski trails. Increase snowshoe trails. Invasive Species: 39 25 Aquatic invasive species concern. 4 Terrestrial Invasive species concern. Fishing & Boating: 39 8 Fishing management on lakes in Vilas County. 4 Fish spearing. 5 Fishing. 0 Maintain clean lakes and waters. 3 Shorelines lack buffers on lakes. 4 Enforce boating laws. Allow motor trolling on all lakes. 2 Jet boats. Lake levels dropping. Improving public access points to lakes for boating. Snowmobiles: 36 Snowmobiling is an issue. 7 Improve or maintain snowmobile trails within county.

Vilas County 202 Outdoor Recreation Survey Results Snowmobiles (continued) 7 Lack of snow in winter. Snowmobile season shortening. Help the Vilas County Snowmobile alliance to help the clubs with increasing cost of fuel. Land Development: 6 2 Overdevelopment. 3 Air/noise pollution. 2 Fragmentation of large privately owned forested areas. 2 Preserve dark skies. Continue logging, but eliminate clear cut logging Logging around recreational trails. Development of early successional wildlife habitat. 3 Hunting: Need a comprehensive collaborative plan to tie goals and resources together of towns county and citizen groups. Determine how to derive the most benefits in terms of recreation, health, and economic impact from county s natural resources. 7 Deer management in Vilas County. 2 Hunting & shooting. Wolf hunting is a controversial issue. high seasonal resident hunting/fishing fees Camping: 8 7 Modern camping facilities needed. Campgrounds NCWRPC Note: The Other group below is where all remaining comments from the survey were placed if they did not fit well with any of the above bolded headings. Other: 8 Tourism in general. 7 Preserve natural resources and develop tourism. 4 Silent sport people demonize ATV/UTV motorsport people while expanding their sport.

Vilas County 202 Outdoor Recreation Survey Results Other: (continued) 3 Better park amenities 2 Poor economy 2 Horse trails. Providing opportunities for ALL powered and non-powered outdoor sports. With all the bike trails built, we need a registration fee for bicycle users. No clubs funding and maintaining silent sport trails in Vilas County. Work with DNR to educate rather than fine users. Promote outdoor recreation to ensure support for conservation and preservation. Preserve "wild" character of Vilas Co. A Vilas County Board with too many members led or beholden to the Extreme Environmentalis Group. Apprehension and/or lack of knowledge of what's available for outdoor recreation. season residents dictate our economy- they are against the economical growth of Vilas county updating internet access for visitors Too many events, every single weekend The fact that silent sports don't necessarily provide economic stability. Bad economic times require added ideas and initiatives to expand our tourism base -- ATVs are the logical answer. To maintain and enhance the highest quality environmental conditions in our waters and woodlands. Far too many businesses are closing here in Eagle River. We rely on tourism, we should act to attract the large group of ATV sportspeople. A lack of - need for - coordinated financial investment in our outdoor recreational infrastructuree - such as bike/ped trails, campgrounds. Devoting county funds to retaining the expert personnel needed to successfully execute any county recreational plan. Recruit sponsors for silent sports activities similar to snowmobile derby. ignorance to what can be done to improve the area Stop wasting Tax Payer money on Bicycle trails that hardly any one uses. Recreation based primarily on the Silent Sports Local Business is losing out on lots of $$ because of the current ATV policy utilization of multi-use recreational trails Suronding counties much freindlier around power sports Need more Motorsports recreation

Vilas County 202 Outdoor Recreation Survey Results Other: (continued) promoting positive features Lack of inforcement of existing regulations Disconnected bike trails Protecting our wildlife Manage loud sports Lake levels dropping - Beaver Dam issues Allowing one user group to dominate resources of the county Have laws in place to regulate ATVs. Once laws are in place, allow ATV activities in townships. Funds to improve, sustain, and create recreational venues and activities. support silent sports warmer climate WOLVES, BEAR AND COYOTE improved grouse habitat Recreation of a 'safe hiking' back-woods environment ****************************************************************************************