The Quality of Life Report - PDF Free Download

The Quality of Life Report A Foundation for Policy Development Tulsa City Council / 2014-16 Term Tulsa Skyline - view from ONEOK field by Vladxp, Creative Commons (NC-ND 2011)

I know not anything more pleasant, or more instructive, than to compare experience with expectation, or to register from time to time the difference between idea and reality. It is by this kind of observation that we grow daily less liable to be disappointed. Samuel Johnson

Overall Health & Wealth Median Income College Education Unemployment Disability Life Expectancy Obesity

Overall Health & Wealth Portland Minneapolis Omaha Cleveland Pittsburgh Oakland Denver Albuquerque Wichita Kansas City Tulsa Oklahoma City St. Louis Louisville Nashville Raleigh Tucson Ft. Worth New Orleans Tampa

Portland Minneapolis Omaha Cleveland Pittsburgh Oakland Denver Albuquerque Wichita Kansas City Tulsa Oklahoma City St. Louis Louisville Nashville Raleigh Tucson Ft. Worth New Orleans Tampa Most current data for comparable cities...

0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 Portland Oakland Fort Worth Denver Nashville Portland Oklahoma City Louisville Albuquerque Tucson Kansas City Omaha Raleigh Oakland Minneapolis Tulsa Cleveland Wichita Tucson New Orleans Tampa St. Louis Pittsburgh Denver Albuquerque Omaha Wichita Tulsa Minneapolis Oklahoma City Ft. Worth Kansas City median St. Louis Louisville Nashville New Orleans Cleveland Pittsburgh Tampa Raleigh Most current data for comparable cities...

12 and City of Tulsa data over time. 10 8 6 4 2 0 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996

Demography

0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 Fort Worth Denver Nashville Portland Oklahoma City Louisville Albuquerque Tucson Kansas City Omaha Raleigh Oakland Minneapolis Tulsa Cleveland Wichita New Orleans Tampa St. Louis Pittsburgh 398,724 median 2013 Population

-25% -15% -5% 5% 15% 25% 35% 45% 55% -22% -18% Raleigh Fort Worth Albuquerque Oklahoma City Denver Tampa Nashville Portland Omaha Louisville Wichita Tucson Kansas City Minneapolis Oakland Tulsa -9% -9% St. Louis Pittsburgh Cleveland 52% 47% 24% 21% 17% 16% 16% 15% 11% 11% 10% 8% 6% 5% 2% 1% median New Orleans Population Change 2000-13

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 Minneapolis Oakland Pittsburgh St. Louis Cleveland Portland Denver Omaha Tampa Albuquerque Raleigh Wichita Tucson Fort Worth New Orleans Tulsa Louisville Kansas City Nashville Oklahoma City 1,992 median Population Density (people per square mile)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Albuquerque Wichita Tucson Omaha Louisville Oklahoma City Tulsa Nashville Raleigh New Orleans Portland Denver Kansas City Cleveland Pittsburgh Tampa Fort Worth Minneapolis St. Louis Oakland median 41.4% 2013 City Population as % of MSA

population distribution 90% 80% City of Tulsa and Its Suburbs Percent of MSA Population (1910-2013) 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% % City of Tulsa % Outside City 0% 2013 (est.) 2010 2000 1990 1980 1970 1960 1950 1940 1930 1920 1910

100% 90% City of Tulsa and Its Suburbs Population Growth by Decade (1920-2010) 80% 70% 60% 96% City of Tulsa Largest Suburbs Combined 78% 50% 40% 30% 43% 40% 20% 10% 29% 6% 13% 30% 31% 34% 27% 33% 0% 5% 1% 6% 2% 7% 2000-10 1990-00 1980-90 1970-80 1960-70 1950-60 1940-50 1930-40 1920-30

700,000 600,000 Tulsa and Oklahoma City - Population History (1900-2013) 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 Oklahoma City City of Tulsa 100,000 0 2013 (est.) 2010 2000 1990 1980 1970 1960 1950 1940 1930 1920 1910 1900

450,000 City of Tulsa Population History 398,724 400,000 350,000 Net Growth from 2000-2013: +5,675 300,000 30,000 250,000 200,000 20,000 10,000 City of Tulsa Population Change (2000-2013) Hispanic or Latino (of any race) +31,082 0 150,000 100,000-10,000-20,000 Not Hispanic or Latino -25,407-30,000 50,000 0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013 (est.)

450,000 City of Tulsa Population History 398,724 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013 (est.)

450,000 City of Tulsa Population History 400,000 350,000 300,000 373,317 (-25,407) 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 with no Hispanic population growth from 2000-13 0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013 (est.)

100% 90% Hispanic or Latino Percent of Total City of Tulsa Population 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 14.1% 14.8% 7.2% 2.6% 1990 2000 2010 2013 (est.)

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Albuquerque Tucson Fort Worth Denver Oakland Tampa Oklahoma City Wichita Tulsa Omaha Cleveland Raleigh Kansas City Nashville Portland Minneapolis New Orleans Louisville St. Louis Pittsburgh 14.8% median Percent Hispanic or Latino (any race)

51.6% Hispanic or Latino Origin Tulsa County Census Tracts where Hispanic or Latino Residents are More than 33% of the Population

Race/Ethnicity 100% 100% 90% 90% 80% 80% 70% 70% 60% 60% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% Other Black or African American White Hispanic or Latino (any race)

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Oakland Tucson Fort Worth Albuquerque Denver Tampa Oklahoma City Minneapolis Portland Wichita Raleigh Nashville Tulsa Omaha Kansas City Cleveland Pittsburgh St. Louis New Orleans Louisville 16.2% median Language Other Than English Spoken at Home

28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Louisville Portland Oakland Albuquerque Tampa New Orleans Kansas City Cleveland Tulsa St. Louis Omaha Denver Oklahoma City Wichita Nashville Pittsburgh Tucson Raleigh Minneapolis Fort Worth median 34.7 Median Age

100% Age Profile 100% 90% 90% 80% 80% 70% 70% 60% 60% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% 65-Years and Older 18-65 Years Younger than 18-Years "Millennials" (18-34 Years)

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 11% 12% 13% 14% 15% Minneapolis Denver Pittsburgh Raleigh Portland Nashville St. Louis New Orleans Oakland Kansas City Tampa Omaha Albuquerque Oklahoma City Louisville Tulsa Fort Worth Wichita Cleveland Tucson 4.7% median Young Professionals Percent of Population Age 25-34 with Bachelor's Degree or Higher

TU/Kendall-Whittier Downtown/ Riverview Renaissance/Florence Park/ Yorktown/Gillette/Swan Lake Brookside 14.2% Lewis Crest/ Southern Hills King s Landing/Crown Chase Apts./Silver Chase/Hunter s Pointe Jenks Young Professionals Tulsa County Census Tracts where Residents Age 25-34 with Bachelor s Degrees are 10% or More of the Population

60,000 50,000 City of Tulsa Age Distribution (2000 and 2013) 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0

50% 40% City of Tulsa - Age Range Growth (from 2000 to 2013) 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% -30%

Economic Vitality

$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 Fort Worth Oakland Minneapolis Denver Portland St. Louis Pittsburgh Cleveland Tampa Kansas City Nashville New Orleans Oklahoma City Rahleigh Louisville Tulsa Omaha Albuquerque Tucson Wichita $55,000 median 2013 Gross Domestic Product (MSA) (in millions current dollars)

5.2%

$0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000 $80,000 Oakland Portland Minneapolis Denver Fort Worth Omaha New Orleans Cleveland Nashville Kansas City Pittsburgh Raleigh Tulsa Oklahoma City St. Louis Louisville Wichita Albuquerque Tampa Tucson $51,599 median 2013 Real Per Capita Gross Domestic Product (MSA)

500,000 450,000 Tulsa Area Employment (1990-2013 & Oct. 2014) 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 Service Providing 150,000 100,000 50,000 Goods Producing 0 2014 (Oct.) 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990

6% 5% Tulsa Area Employment Growth (1991-2013 and Oct. 2014) 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% -1% -2% 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 (Oct.) -3% -4% -5%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% Oakland Cleveland St. Louis Louisville Wichita Tampa Tucson Kansas City New Orleans Denver Pittsburgh Portland Albuquerque Nashville Fort Worth Raleigh Tulsa Oklahoma City Minneapolis Omaha 5.3% median 2013 Average Unemployment Rate

10% Average Annual Unemployment Rate (1990-2013 and Oct. 2014) 8% 6% 4% 2% Oklahoma Tulsa MSA City of Tulsa U.S. 0% Oct. 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990

Unemployment Tulsa County Census Tracts with Unemployment above 10% 12.7%

Average Weekly Wage Cost of Living Index $1,400 Wages vs. Cost of Living 140 $1,200 120 $1,000 100 $800 80 $600 60 $400 40 $200 20 $0 0 2013 County Average Weekly Wage Composite Cost of Living (US Avg. 100)

$0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 Denver Nashville Minneapolis Pittsburgh St. Louis Raleigh Oklahoma City Tulsa Louisville Omaha Cleveland Tampa Kansas City Fort Worth New Orleans Wichita Albuquerque Tucson Portland Oakland $1,004 median Average Weekly Wage Adjusted for Cost of Living

8% Tulsa County Growth in Average Annual Pay (2002-13) 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% -1% 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

36.6% Wealth Tulsa County Census Tracts with More than 25% of Households with Annual Income of $200,000 or More

Peoria 36 th Street N. 67.7% Charles Page Eugene Field 61 st & Peoria Poverty Tulsa County Census Tracts where More than 40% of Families with Income Live in Poverty

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Cleveland New Orleans St. Louis Tucson Tampa Tulsa Fort Worth Albuquerque Pittsburgh Wichita Minneapolis Denver Oakland Kansas City Oklahoma City Nashville Omaha Louisville Portland Raleigh 15.8% median Percent of Families with Incomes below Poverty

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Cleveland New Orleans St. Louis Tucson Tampa Tulsa Fort Worth Albuquerque Pittsburgh Wichita Minneapolis Denver Oakland Kansas City Oklahoma City Nashville Omaha Louisville Portland Raleigh 47.4% Percent of Families Headed by Single Mothers, with Children under 5, with Incomes below Poverty

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Cleveland St. Louis New Orleans Portland Tucson Tampa Pittsburgh Tulsa Minneapolis Louisville Fort Worth Oklahoma City Albuquerque Kansas City Wichita Nashville Oakland Omaha Denver Raleigh 17.7% median Percent of Households with Cash Public Assistance or Food Stamps/SNAP

100,000 90,000 Tulsa County Public Support for Families (for the month of December 2001-2013, and February 2014) 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 Food Stamps (persons) TANF (persons) Child Care Subsidies ( 5 Years) 20,000 10,000 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

12,000 Bankruptcy Filings (N.D. Okla. 1995-2014) 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990

Sales Tax Revenue (in thousands) $150,000 $140,000 City of Tulsa 2 Sales Tax Revenue $130,000 $120,000 $110,000 $100,000 $90,000 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990

$180,000,000 $160,000,000 Tulsa MSA Retail Trade (1999-2014) +149% $140,000,000 $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80,000,000-13% $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 Food (Groceries) Eating & Drinking Out $0 Sep-14 Mar-14 Sep-13 Mar-13 Sep-12 Mar-12 Sep-11 Mar-11 Sep-10 Mar-10 Sep-09 Mar-09 Sep-08 Mar-08 Sep-07 Mar-07 Sep-06 Mar-06 Sep-05 Mar-05 Sep-04 Mar-04 Sep-03 Mar-03 Sep-02 Mar-02 Sep-01 Mar-01 Sep-00 Mar-00 Sep-99 Mar-99

The Relationship between Employment, Retail Sales, and Property Crime

Sales Tax Revenue (in thousands) Tulsa Area Non-Farm Employment $150,000 $140,000 Tulsa Area Employment 2 Sales Tax Revenue 450,000 440,000 430,000 $130,000 420,000 410,000 $120,000 $110,000 $100,000 $90,000 $80,000 $70,000 400,000 390,000 380,000 370,000 360,000 350,000 340,000 330,000 320,000 310,000 $60,000 300,000 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990

Sales Tax Revenue (in thousands) Tulsa Area Non-Farm Employment $150,000 $140,000 Tulsa Area Employment 2 Sales Tax Revenue 450,000 440,000 430,000 $130,000 420,000 410,000 $120,000 $110,000 $100,000 400,000 390,000 380,000 370,000 360,000 $90,000 $80,000 $70,000 R 2 =.97 (97% explained variance) 350,000 340,000 330,000 320,000 310,000 $60,000 300,000 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990

Property Crimes Unemployment Rate 30,000 City of Tulsa Average Annual Unemployment Rate City of Tulsa Property Crimes 8% 28,000 7% 26,000 6% 5% 24,000 4% 22,000 3% 20,000 2% 18,000 1% 16,000 0% 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995

Property Crimes Unemployment Rate 30,000 City of Tulsa Average Annual Unemployment Rate City of Tulsa Property Crimes 8% 28,000 7% 26,000 6% 5% 24,000 4% 22,000 3% 20,000 18,000 R 2 =.82 (82% explained variance) 2% 1% 16,000 0% 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995

Consistent with Studies On the whole, the preponderance of the evidence suggests that there is an important relationship between unemployment rates and property crime but little impact of unemployment on violent crime. The relationship between unemployment and property crime is empirically meaningful as property crime would be predicted to rise by between 9 and 18 percent during a serious recession in which unemployment increased by three percentage points. Moreover, this, if anything, may understate the magnitude of the relationship as crime appears to be particularly sensitive to the existence of employment opportunities for low skilled-men. Chalfin & McCrary, Criminal Deterrence: A Review of the Literature (2014)

Property Crimes Unemployment Rate 15,000,000 14,000,000 National Average Annual Unemployment Rate National Property Crimes 10% 9% 13,000,000 8% 12,000,000 7% 11,000,000 10,000,000 9,000,000 6% 5% 4% 3% 8,000,000 2% 7,000,000 1% 6,000,000 0% 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995

Public Safety

6,000.00 5,000.00 4,000.00 3,000.00 National Property Crime Rate -47% 2,000.00 1,000.00 National Violent Crime Rate -45% 0.00 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989

100% 90% Gallop Poll: Is there more crime in the U.S. than there was a year ago, or less? 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% % More % Less 30% 20% 10% 0% 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989

40,000 City of Tulsa Part I Crimes 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 In 2012, there were 11,757 fewer major crimes reported than in 1987 (-32%). 10,000 5,000 0

10,000 City of Tulsa Part I Crimes per 100,000 Residents 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 The property crime rate decreased by 42% from 1987 to 2012. 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 The violent crime rate decreased by 27% from 1992 to 2013.

70 Property Crimes per 1,000 Residents 60 Violent Crimes per 1,000 Residents 50 53.2 median 40 30 20 10 9.7 median 0

0 1 2 3 4 New Orleans St. Louis Oakland Kansas City Tulsa Pittsburgh Cleveland Oklahoma City Omaha Minneapolis Tucson Tampa Louisville Albuquerque Denver Fort Worth Nashville Wichita Raleigh Portland median 1.52 Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter per 10,000 Residents

0 50 100 150 200 250 Cleveland Tulsa Kansas City St. Louis Oklahoma City Albuquerque Oakland Minneapolis Fort Worth Louisville Wichita Tucson Nashville New Orleans Omaha Denver Raleigh Pittsburgh Portland Tampa median 150 Burglaries per 10,000 Residents

350 300 Tulsa Comparison City Median 250 200 150 100 50 0 Robberies per 10,000 Residents Aggravated Assaults per 10,000 Residents Larcenies-Thefts per 10,000 Residents Motor Vehicle Thefts per 10,000 Residents

5,000 City of Tulsa Part I Crimes per 100,000 Residents 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 Larceny-Theft Rate Aggravated Assault Rate Robbery Rate Murder and Manslaughter Rate Burglary Rate Motor Vehicle Theft Rate Rape Rate 1,500 1,000 500 0

60,000 Tulsa Fire Department Responses (1982-2013) 50,000 Mutual Aid Responses Hazardous Materials Responses 40,000 Other Hazardous Responses False Alarms All Other Responses 30,000 Rescue, Emergency Medical Responses Fires 20,000 10,000-2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982

80,000 70,000 EMSA Eastern Division Transports (1995-2014) 60,000 50,000 Emergency Transports Non-Emergency Transports 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995

Transportation

Minutes 30 Average Travel Time to Work 25 median 20 15 10 5 0

Commuting Profile 100% 90% 7.1% 13.5% 80% 70% 18.4% 80.5% 85.8% 60% 50% 12.1% Other Work at Home 40% 30% 20% 10% Bike or Walk Public Transportation Carpool Drive Alone 0%

31.2% Walking Tulsa County Census Tracts where More than 7% of Residents Walk to Work

6.7% Transit Tulsa County Census Tracts where More than 5% of Residents Take Public Transportation to Work

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 Oakland Portland Denver Minneapolis St. Louis New Orleans Pittsburgh Cleveland Tucson Albuquerque Nashville Raleigh Tampa Louisville Kansas City Fort Worth Tulsa Wichita Omaha Oklahoma City median Annual Transit Passenger Miles Per Capita (all modes)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Oakland Portland New Orleans Pittsburgh Minneapolis Tucson Denver Cleveland St. Louis Kansas City Albuquerque Louisville Raleigh Tampa Nashville Fort Worth Tulsa Omaha Wichita Oklahoma City median Annual Transit Passenger Trips Per Capita (all modes)

$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 Oakland Portland New Orleans Pittsburgh Minneapolis Denver Cleveland St. Louis Tucson Kansas City Albuquerque Nashville Louisville Raleigh Tampa Fort Worth Tulsa Omaha Wichita Oklahoma City median Annual Transit Operating Expenditures Per Capita (all modes)

90 85 80 75 70 Arterial Pavement Condition (1992-2010, and projected to 2019) Council District 1 Council District 2 Council District 3 Council District 4 Council District 5 Council District 6 Council District 7 Council District 8 Council District 9 City-wide Weighted Average 65 60 55 50 1992 1997 2002 2006 2010 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

90 85 80 75 70 Non-Arterial Pavement Condition (1992-2008, and projected to 2019) Council District 1 Council District 2 Council District 3 Council District 4 Council District 5 Council District 6 Council District 7 Council District 8 Council District 9 City-wide Weighted Average 65 60 55 50 1990 1995 2000 2004 2008 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Passengers Tons of Cargo 350,000 330,000 310,000 Tulsa Airports Monthly Traffic (2007-Nov. 2014) 6,500 6,000 290,000 5,500 270,000 5,000 250,000 230,000 4,500 210,000 4,000 190,000 170,000 150,000 Total Passengers Total Cargo 12 per. Mov. Avg. (Total Passengers) 12 per. Mov. Avg. (Total Cargo) J M M J S N J M M J S N J M M J S N J M M J S N J M M J S N J M M J S N J M M J S N J M M J S N 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 3,500 3,000

0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Tulsa Port of Catoosa Tonnage (1971-2013)

Neighborhood Vitality

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 Fort Worth Denver Oakland Portland Minneapolis Tampa Nashville Raleigh Kansas City Louisville Omaha Pittsburgh Albuquerque Oklahoma City Tucson St. Louis Tulsa Wichita New Orleans Cleveland 616 3,013 2013 Number of New 5+Family Dwelling Units 2013 Number of New Single- Family Dwelling Units

# Units Value 40% 14% 35% 12% 30% 11.1% 10% 8% 25% 6% 20% 4% 15% 2% 10% 11.6% 0% -2% 5% -4% 0% -6% 2012-13 Growth in # of New Single Family Housing Units 2012-13 Growth in Average Value of New Single Family Housing Units

$250,000 Tulsa MSA - New Single-Family Building Permits (1980-2013) 6,000 $200,000 Units Value ($) 5,000 4,000 $150,000 3,000 $100,000 2,000 $50,000 1,000 $0 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 0

60% 50% Tulsa MSA - New Single-Family Building Permits Annual Percent Change (1981-2013 ) 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013-20% -30% -35.5% -40% -44.9% -50%

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Tulsa Metro Area Home Sales (2008-14) 12-Month Moving Average

20.000 18.000 City of Tulsa - Foreclosures per 10,000 Homes (2004-14) 16.000 14.000 12.000 12-month moving average 10.000 8.000 6.000 4.000 2.000 0.000 Sep-14 May-14 Jan-14 Sep-13 May-13 Jan-13 Sep-12 May-12 Jan-12 Sep-11 May-11 Jan-11 Sep-10 May-10 Jan-10 Sep-09 May-09 Jan-09 Sep-08 May-08 Jan-08 Sep-07 May-07 Jan-07 Sep-06 May-06 Jan-06 Sep-05 May-05 Jan-05 Sep-04 May-04 Jan-04

35% City of Tulsa Percentage of Homes Sold for Loss (2004-14) 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Sep-14 May-14 Jan-14 Sep-13 May-13 Jan-13 Sep-12 May-12 Jan-12 Sep-11 May-11 Jan-11 Sep-10 May-10 Jan-10 Sep-09 May-09 Jan-09 Sep-08 May-08 Jan-08 Sep-07 May-07 Jan-07 Sep-06 May-06 Jan-06 Sep-05 May-05 Jan-05 Sep-04 May-04 Jan-04

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Cleveland St. Louis New Orleans Kansas City Pittsburgh Tulsa Tucson Oklahoma City Tampa Wichita Louisville Albuquerque Nashville Fort Worth Raleigh Omaha Oakland Denver Minneapolis median 12.7% Portland % Vacant Housing Units

33.5% Housing Vacancy Tulsa County Census Tracts where More than 25% of the Housing Units are Vacant

$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 Oakland Portland Denver Raleigh Minneapolis Albuquerque New Orleans Nashville Tampa Louisville Oklahoma City Omaha Kansas City Tucson Tulsa Fort Worth Wichita St. Louis Pittsburgh Cleveland $121,300 median Median Value of Owner-Occupied Units

100% 90% 49.0% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 51.0% 30% 20% Renter-Occupied Units Owner-Occupied Units 10% 0%

98.1% 98.2% Housing Tenure

$0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 Oakland Portland Tampa New Orleans Raleigh Denver Fort Worth Nashville Minneapolis Albuquerque Pittsburgh Kansas City Omaha Oklahoma City Tucson Tulsa St. Louis Louisville Wichita Cleveland $727 median Median Gross Rent

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% New Orleans Cleveland Tucson Oakland Albuquerque Portland Tampa Pittsburgh St. Louis Omaha Denver Kansas City Minneapolis Fort Worth Louisville Tulsa Oklahoma City Wichita Raleigh Nashville 38.1% median Gross Rent 35% or More of Household Income

Human Investment

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Raleigh Minneapolis Portland Denver Pittsburgh Oakland Nashville New Orleans Tampa Albuquerque Omaha St. Louis Kansas City Tulsa Wichita Fort Worth Oklahoma City Louisville Tucson Cleveland 31.0% median Bachelor's Degree or Higher High School Graduate or Higher (including GED)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Raleigh Minneapolis Portland Denver Pittsburgh Oakland Nashville New Orleans Tampa Albuquerque Omaha St. Louis Kansas City Tulsa Wichita Fort Worth Oklahoma City Louisville Tucson Cleveland Bachelor's Degree or Higher High School Graduate or Higher (including GED)

25 Public Schools $30,000 20 $25,000 15 $20,000 $15,000 10 $10,000 5 $5,000 0 $0 Student/Teacher Ratio (largest public district in city) Total Expenditures per Student (largest public district in city)

25 $30,000 20 $25,000 15 $20,000 $15,000 10 $10,000 5 $5,000 0 Tulsa Union Jenks $0 Student/Teacher Ratio Total Expenditures per Student

Percent of 4-Year-Olds Enrolled in State Pre-Kindergarten (Statewide) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Tampa Oklahoma City Tulsa Fort Worth New Orleans Louisville Omaha Raleigh Nashville Wichita Albuquerque Oakland Denver Pittsburgh Portland Tucson Kansas City St. Louis Cleveland Minneapolis median

35% 30% Health Profile Percent Obese Percent of Adults who Smoke Percent who Exercise 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0%

8,000 Percent Obese 33% 7,000 2010 Population Density (per square mile) 31% 6,000 29% 5,000 4,000 3,000 27% 25% 23% 21% 2,000 19% 1,000 17% 0 15%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Fort Worth Tulsa Oklahoma City Tucson St. Louis Oakland Kansas City New Orleans Nashville Cleveland Albuquerque Denver Wichita Raleigh Tampa Portland Louisville Omaha Minneapolis Pittsburgh median Children with no health insurance coverage Adults with no health insurance coverage

45.4% Health Insurance Tulsa County Census Tracts where More than 40% of Residents Have no Health Insurance Coverage

Recreation & Culture

Tulsa Park and Recreation Department 5,995 acres River Parks Authority 1,066 acres Tulsa County Parks (within city of Tulsa) 230 acres 7,291 acres

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Minneapolis Omaha St. Louis Denver Portland Fort Worth Cleveland Oakland Tampa Raleigh Kansas City Pittsburgh Albuquerque Wichita Louisville Tulsa Nashville Tucson New Orleans Oklahoma City 1.9% 3.9% Parkland as Percent of Adjusted Total Land Area Designed Parkland (all jurisdictions) Natural Parkland (all jurisdictions)

80 70 Acres of Parkland per 1,000 Residents # Park Units per 100,000 Residents 80 70 60 60 50 40 median 50 40 30 30 20 10 median 20 10 0 0

100% 94% Percent of Population With Walkable Park Access (only calculated for 50 largest cities) 90% 80% 85% 81% 80% 78% 76% 76% 70% 64% 60% 55% 54% 53% 52% 50% median 50% 42% 40% 36% 32% 30% 20% 10% 0% Park Access is the ability to reach a publicly owned park within a half-mile walk on the road network, unobstructed by freeways, rivers, fences, and other obstacles.

$0 $15 $30 $45 $60 $75 $90 $105 $120 $135 $150 $165 $180 $195 $210 $225 Minneapolis Raleigh Oakland Portland Tampa St. Louis Kansas City Denver Tucson Cleveland Pittsburgh Fort Worth Omaha New Orleans Louisville/Jefferson Nashville/Davidson Albuquerque Wichita Oklahoma City Tulsa $34.18 $4.99 median Park Operating Expenditure per Resident Park Capital Expenditure per Resident

400,000 Attendance Performing Arts Center (FY2002-14) $14,000,000 350,000 Gross Ticket Sales $12,000,000 300,000 $10,000,000 250,000 $8,000,000 200,000 $6,000,000 150,000 100,000 $4,000,000 50,000 $2,000,000 0 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 $0

Environment

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Pittsburgh Fort Worth Cleveland St. Louis Tulsa Louisville Oklahoma City Albuquerque Oakland Tampa Raleigh Nashville Omaha Tucson Portland Wichita Denver Kansas City Minneapolis New Orleans median Air Quality - Ten Year Average Annual Number of Unhealthy Days for Older Adults and Children (County)

parts per million 0.098 Tulsa Area Ground Level Ozone (3-Year average of the 4th highest ozone level) 0.093 0.088 0.083 0.078 0.073 0.068 0.063 0.058 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Pounds 3,000,000 Tulsa County Toxic Chemical Releases (2001-13) 2,500,000 Total On-site Releases to Land Total Underground Injection 2,000,000 Surface Water Discharges Total Air Emissions 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Tons 16,000 14,000 City of Tulsa Residential Recycling (FY01-14) 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 subscription service 2,000 0 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14

Citizen Engagement

rate hours 40% 35% 2012 Volunteer Rates 2012 Volunteer Hours per Resident 45 40 30% 35 25% 20% 15% 30 25 20 15 10% 10 5% 5 0% 0

6% Percent of Adjusted Gross Income Given to Charity (County) $5,000 5% 5.53% Median Annual Charitable Contribution (County) $4,500 $4,000 4% $3,500 $3,000 3% $2,500 $2,000 2% $1,500 1% $1,000 $500 0% $0

6% Percent of Adjusted Gross Income Given to Charity (County) 5% $4,622 5.53% Median Annual Charitable Contribution (County) $5,000 $4,500 $4,000 4% $3,500 $3,000 3% $2,500 $2,000 2% $1,500 1% $1,000 $500 0% $0