SPLASH PAD EVALUATION SUMMARY REPORT January 2016

Similar documents
POLICY & STRATEGIES The Vancouver Park Board approves major changes in Vancouver parks, including the design and development of parks.

Committee. Presentation Outline

China Creek North Park Upgrades and Glen Pump Station. Park Board Committee Meeting Monday, July 10, 2017

Auburn Trail / Ontario Pathways Trail Connector Feasibility Study Public Information Meeting Wednesday, August 22, 2012

North Tonawanda Memorial Pool Feasibility Study. Council Presentation October 23, 2018 PRELIMINARY PRESENTATION

Section II. Planning & Public Process Planning for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail began in 2010 as a City of Minnetrista initiative.

Dover Park Master Plan. Community Design Event Tuesday, May 22, 5 7 pm

Macleod Trail Corridor Study. Welcome. Macleod Trail Corridor Study Open House. Presentation of Proposed Design Concepts

Header i

St. John s Park Redevelopment Master Plan Public Engagement Report

Agenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3

BRYAN REGIONAL PARK. Presented by: Burditt Consultants November 13, 2018

Community Advisory Committee Meeting #3 April 21, 2015

A Master Plan is one of the most important documents that can be prepared by an Airport.

Subject: 2014 Capital Works Program - Splash Pad in Centennial Square Supplementary Report

APPENDIX D: OUTREACH SUMMARIES

National Touring Survey Report

Pier Enhancements April 6, 2017

Implementation Strategy for the Lethbridge Destination Management Organization (LDMO)

Chapter 1: Introduction Draft

Aquatics Master Plan. Dallas City Council Quality of Life and Environment Committee. September 14, 2015

Fair Oaks Ranch Homeowners Association Parks and Trails Master Plan Survey Results

Welcome to the future of Terwillegar Park a Unique Natural Park

Longmont to Boulder Regional Trail Jay Road Connection DRAFT FINAL REPORT

OREGON TOURISM LISTENING SESSION SUM M ARY

Aquatics Master Plan Update. Dallas City Council. September 2, 2015

Project Deliverable 4.1.3d Individual City Report - City of La Verne

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

Santa Clara South Hills Recreation Park Project Development and Management Plan

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE

Establishing a National Urban Park in the Rouge Valley

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REPORT PURPOSE EXISTING SETTING EXPANDING PARKLAND

Chapter 1: Introduction

COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT (Lisa Belsanti, Director) (Joshua Schare, Public Information Officer)

8. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Manatee County. Manatee County Parks, Recreation, and Open Spaces Master Plan. Status Update. Manatee County Board of County Commissioners Update

Assessing Next-Generation Construction Helmets

St. Dennis Drive Conversion of Traffic Lanes to On- Street Parking and Bicycle Lanes

X Respond to staff direction

Trail # NW Tuesday, June DESIGN. Provide an Review the Provide an. Project Goals: System system. wayfinding

Corktown Parks. Public Meeting. City of Toronto

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN THE CITY OF ST. CATHARINES

Casa Loma Heritage Conservation District (HCD) Study. Community Consultation Meeting #1 Summary Report


Multimodal Planning Studies

NORTH OF BROADWAY SECTION CONTENTS: COTTAGE PARK FARVIEW PARK GLEN GALE PARK IRVING TRIANGLE JORDAN PARK NEWTON PARK PERKINS HILL PARK

Introduction DRAFT March 9, 2017

(Also known as the Den-Ice Agreements Program) Evaluation & Advisory Services. Transport Canada

Pillar Park. Management Plan

Clam Harbour Provincial Park

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

Interreg Vb /Prowad Link WP6.5. Feasibilitystudy, nature tourism routes around the North Sea Region Project description

THE RESERVE III AT SUGAR MOUNTAIN, NORTH CAROLINA

FORECASTING FUTURE ACTIVITY

Toronto Pearson Master Plan Greater Toronto Airports Authority October 4, 2017

New Opportunities PUBLIC WORKSHOP. Venice Municipal. Bringing g the pieces together

SAXON HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT SURVEY

Steps in the Management Planning Process

12, 14 and 16 York Street - Amendments to Section 16 Agreement and Road Closure Authorization

APPLICATION FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LETTER OF INTENT Amended

NORTHWEST SECTION CONTENTS: CLEVELAND PARK FOLWELL PARK RYAN LAKE PARK VICTORY PRAIRIE DOG PARK VICTORY PARK

Lake Tahoe Shoreline Plan 03 Policy Topic: Access Issues

PULLMAN-MOSCOW REGIONAL AIRPORT Runway Realignment Project

ATKINSON PARK POOL / SPLASH PAD PUBLIC

IATA Fuel Efficiency Program

MRO 2017 Stakeholder Survey

Report on Installation of Wayside Horns at Railroad Crossings and Railroad Trench System

JOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012

Committee Report. Community Development Committee For the Metropolitan Council meeting of April 13, Business Item No.


3.0 LEARNING FROM CHATHAM-KENT S CITIZENS

Chapter 6. Action Program. Heart of the Lakes Area Recreation Plan

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS PUBLIC MEETING DECEMBER 6, 2017

Villages at Buffalo Run East

Slum Situation Analysis

RIVER ACCESS STRATEGY

EAT Master Plan Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) Meeting #2 Summary (FINAL)

HIGHWAY 17 WILDLIFE and REGIONAL TRAIL CROSSINGS

National Park Authority Board Meeting

Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport

Establishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014.

Understanding the caring capacity of the visitor experience Provide facilities to support a high level user experience Address visual quality through

Report to COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & SERVICES Committee for

2015 Budget Parks & Recreation Department

GUEST EXPERIENCE MANAGEMENT AND PASSENGER AMENITIES SURVEY FEBRUARY 2017

Factors Influencing Visitor's Choices of Urban Destinations in North America

Let'sPlaySF! SERGEANT JOHN MACAULAY PARK. Recreation and Park Commission Approval of Concept Design November 1, 2017

Preferred Alternative Summary

Ministry of Parks, Culture and Sport. Plan for saskatchewan.ca

AGENDA ITEM 5 D WAKULLA ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE (WEI) TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY

Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

STUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

1.0 BACKGROUND NEW VETERANS CHARTER EVALUATION OBJECTIVES STUDY APPROACH EVALUATION LIMITATIONS... 7

Region of Waterloo Planning, Development and Legislative Services Region of Waterloo International Airport Office of Economic Development

ES Aircraft Deicing Document Identification Number Date: March 15, ) Activity Description:

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

Wanaka Community Board 15 April Report for Agenda Item: 4

Applewood Heights Community Open House

Transcription:

Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County Public Power Benefit Recreation and Parks Phase: Pre-feasibility For full report, refer to Appendix A SPLASH PAD EVALUATION SUMMARY REPORT January 2016 Photo 1 Example only. Centennial Park, Las Vegas, NV Photo 2 Example only. Rotary Park, Wenatchee, WA Introduction: Splash pads come in many different sizes and shapes; they come with different water features and have various amenities. Typically splash pads avoid any water ponding. Water is sprayed through a nozzle. There s generally not so much splashing as there is spraying. Chelan PUD staff has visited splash pad sites in Wenatchee, WA, Tacoma, WA and in the greater Las Vegas area. Background: During the last several months Chelan PUD has conducted surveys at various forums. The surveys provided a list of parks and asked respondents to select a park for which they would like to have a splash pad built. The overwhelming majority selected Walla Walla Park as their preferred location. Walla Walla Park is located in Chelan county s largest urban center and therefore appears to be consistent with the Public Power Benefit slogan: the best, for the most for the longest. PUD staff generally agrees that Walla Walla Park, of all PUD parks, is the most logical location for a splash pad. Determining where to site a splash pad within Walla Walla park would need to be studied further. Primary Considerations: 1. Amenities: Splash pad amenities would likely be needed. These would include bathroom/changing room, shade canopies, benches, lighting and fencing to name a few. 2. Parking: The amount of existing parking was established based on existing amenities. If a splash pad is built then additional parking will be needed. The amount and location of additional parking would be a function of the size/capacity of the splash pad. How much parking to add would therefore also require additional study. 3. Staffing and Resources: A new park employee classification would be required to operate splash pad. The skill set required would be equivalent to a water treatment plant operator especially if water use is re-circulated. Splash Pad Evaluation Page 1 January 2016

4. Location: During 2015, public survey forms were collected at various events. The surveys provided a list of parks and asked respondents to select a park for which they would like to have a splash pad built. 744 surveys were collected. Of those, the overwhelming majority (284) selected Walla Walla Park as their preferred location. Wenatchee Riverfront came in second with 173 votes, and Rocky Reach Dam third, with 119 votes. A list of all votes is included in the Preliminary Findings Report. Costs O&M Costs - $50,000 - $100,000 annually Operation and maintenance costs are dependent on the size of the facility and in large part the type of water system used (single vs. re-circulated). Preliminary research indicates that the minimum annual cost will be greater than $50,000. That number could increase depending on life cycle costs. Because of the relative newness of spray pads there is very little data available on life cycle cost. Capital Cost - $800K to $2M Preliminary findings indicate the capital cost to construct a splash pad at Walla Walla Park would range from $800K to $2M. This value is very preliminary and is based on research gathered from other splash pad operators. Additional study is warranted to determine a more precise cost range. Summary Table: Project Preliminary Cost Estimate Comments Splash Pad Capital $800k - $2M O&M $50k - $100k annually The cost range depicts considerations such as size of the splash pad feature, location, water source, etc. Advisory Committee Input: Consider parking and public transportation to ensure the feature is accessible to the most people. Consider whether an educational value can be added (e.g. tell a story about fish or hydropower). Consider the cost and whether another option would provide more value for the money. Consider avoiding being on the cutting edge of something new. Let technology evolve and be tested before committing. Next Steps: Based on outcome of pre-feasibility study and Advisory Committee feedback, put splash pad option back into Public Power Benefit project list for future consideration. Splash Pad Evaluation Page 2 January 2016

SPLASH PAD FEASIBLITY STUDY - PRELIMINARY FINDINGS Introduction: Over the last several months Chelan PUD staff has been gathering information on splash pads. A formal feasibility study has not yet been conducted. The following bullet points provide a high level look at some of the information gathered by staff. Chelan PUD needs your input to ascertain the community s vision of a splash pad. In addition feedback is also needed to determine an acceptable level of cost. For example we would like to know if there s a dollar amount, if exceeded, that may influence the community to select a different park/recreation amenity then the splash pad. If the information gathered is consistent with the community s vision for a splash pad then the PUD will proceed with a formal, technical feasibility study to evaluate building a splash pad at a specific PUD park. Naming - Splash pads are also referred to as: spraygrounds, spray parks and water parks. What is a splash pad? Splash pads come in many different sizes and shapes; they come with different water features and have various amenities. Typically splash pads avoid any water ponding. Water is sprayed through a nozzle. There s generally not so much splashing as there is spraying. Chelan PUD staff has visited splash pad sites in Wenatchee, WA, Tacoma, WA and in the greater Las Vegas area. Pictures of splash pads from those areas help illustrate a vision for what could be. Popularity Splash pads have grown in popularity over the last 10 15 years. When given a choice many communities are opting to build splash pads rather than swimming pools. This choice is largely due to the more favorable economics of building, maintaining and operating a splash pad versus a pool. This doesn t mean that splash pads don t cost, it just means they cost less than swimming pools. Because splash pads are a relatively recent fad not much data is available about the true costs of splash pads. Opponents have expressed concern that having fewer pools available to the public will result in less opportunity for children to learn how to swim. Proponents argue that the better economy of splash pads means greater accessibility to larger percentage of the general public. Location - During the last several months Chelan PUD has conducted surveys at various forums. The surveys provided a list of parks and asked respondents to select a park for which they would like to have a splash pad built. The overwhelming majority selected Walla Walla Park as their preferred location. Walla Walla Park is located in Chelan county s largest urban center and therefore appears to be consistent with the Public Power Benefit slogan: the best, for the most for the longest. PUD staff generally agrees that Walla Walla Park, of all PUD parks, is the most logical location for a splash pad. Determining where to site a splash pad within Walla Walla park would need to be studied further. Capacity - The classic quote from the movie Field of Dreams, If you build it, [they] will come likely applies in this case. At times the existing dry playground at Walla Walla Park has seen as many as 100 kids at one time (more than one person can count). The size of a splash pad has a direct correlation with cost (ie. the bigger the splash pad, the more it costs). Budget will therefore likely control the size of the splash pad. If a decision is made to continue with a more technical feasibility study then the PUD would likely evaluate the costs of small, medium and large splash pads. Parking - The amount of existing parking was established based on existing amenities. If a splash pad is built then additional parking will be needed. The amount and location of additional parking would be a function of the size/capacity of the splash pad. How much parking to add would therefore also require additional study. Utilities - Development of a splash pad would require analyzing capacity of existing infrastructure specifically utilities (ie. domestic water, storm water, waste water and power including lighting). It s very

likely that utilities currently serving the site would be inadequate therefore requiring utility work prior to any splash pad construction. Dry Playground - PUD staff has visited splash pads in other cities and noted that they all have one thing in common, all are built adjacent to dry playground. The construction of a wet playground adjacent to an existing dry playground will certainly expand use of both. Permits - If a splash pad is built in an existing park the impacts to environment are viewed as negligible. The PUD would need to obtain a water recreation facility permit administered through Washington State Department of Health. The PUD would also likely need to obtain building permits through the local municipality (if Walla Walla then City o Wenatchee). In addition there would be an annual permit with the Chelan-Douglas Health District to operate the splash pad. Amenities - Splash pad amenities would likely be needed. These would include bathroom/changing room, shade canopies, benches, lighting and fencing to name a few. Features - There are at least three companies that supply splash pad equipment: Vortex, Water Odyssey and Waterplay. Each company offers a unique the line of products. Selection of a company and selection within their product lines could easily be an involved stakeholder engagement process of it s own. The PUD would likely select a company based on their product availability and track record of maintainability. Water Use - A major design decision comes in selecting whether to employ a single use versus recirculated water system. Both systems would require a mechanical building; however the re-circulated system would require a much larger building to house a much more complex treatment system. The PUD would likely pursue the re-circulated system based solely on the desire to conserve water and therefore be environmentally responsible. Surface Type - EDPM (Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer ie. rubber) provides a non-slip, non-abrasive, shock absorbing surface. Concrete would be less expensive to install and maintain then EDPM. In either case good water drainage is a must. Poor water surface drainage leads to increased maintenance costs. Staffing - A new park employee classification would be required to operate splash pad. The skill set required would be equivalent to a water treatment plant operator especially if water use is re-circulated. Risks - A splash pad is susceptible to waterborne illness. A splash pad has similar risks as a dry play ground in terms of risk for injury. All amenities in a public park are subject to vandalism. Risks cannot be eliminated but can be minimized through good design and operations. O&M Costs - Operation and maintenance costs are dependent on the size of the facility and in large part the type of water system used (single vs. re-circulated). Preliminary research indicates that the minimum annual cost will be greater than $50,000. That number could increase depending on life cycle costs. Because of the relative newness of spray pads there is very little data available on life cycle cost. Capital Cost - Preliminary findings indicate the capital cost to construct a splash pad at Walla Walla Park would range from $800K to $2M. This value is very preliminary. Additional study is warranted to determine a more precise cost range. Summary: What is the community s vision of a splash pad? Are costs in line with expectations? Or is there a desire to consider other options? Is Walla Walla Park the preferred location? Should Chelan PUD proceed with formal technical feasibility study?

Chelan County PUD - Public Power Benefit Recreation and Parks Splash Pad Location Survey Results (2015) Location # of Votes Walla Walla Point 284 Wenatchee Riverfront 173 Rocky Reach 119 Wenatchee Confluence 113 Lincoln Rock 70 Kirby Billingsley 54 Entiat 52 Chelan Riverwalk 35 Beebe Bridge 31 Manson Bay 30 Chelan Falls 18 Daroga 17 Chelan Falls Powerhouse 11 Old Mill 9 Orondo River 8 Badger Mountain 2 Nowhere 2