Executive Summary Several midsized, technology-dependent metropolitan areas moved back into the top twenty-five performers. Provo-Orem, Utah; Raleigh-Cary, North Carolina; Tucson, Arizona; Huntsville, Alabama; Salt Lake City, Utah; Boise-Nampa, Idaho; and Austin-Round Rock, Texas, are among the technology centers in s top twenty-five performers. Most of these metros have high concentrations of computers, chip and communications equipment, or software manufacturers. Strong business and consumer demand has fueled a recovery in production and hiring in these sectors. Most tech centers, in fact, witnessed increases in their rankings for. No metro in the Northeast and Midwest showed up in the top twenty-five listings. This reflects several enduring trends. The long-term decline of manufacturing, due to increasing competition from such emerging centers as China, has caused a loss of middle-class jobs that aren t easily replaced. Weakness in the automotive market in 006 and continued loss of market share by traditional domestic manufacturers have led to even further retrenchment. Suppliers to those manufacturers have been hit hard, as well. Entrepreneurial activities are lagging in the Midwest especially, but also in the Northeast, and the bulk of new jobs are being created in small and medium-sized firms. The result is twofold: an inability to replace the jobs lost to foreign competition and an out-migration to other parts of the country, reinforcing the downward spiral. Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) Ocala, FL 1 13 Wilmington, NC 59 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 3 10 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 4 15 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL 5 6 Naples-Marco Island, FL 6 3 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 7 4 Provo-Orem, UT 8 3 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 9 11 Raleigh-Cary, NC 10 45 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC 11 35 Charleston-North Charleston, SC 1 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 13 Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL 14 4 Tucson, AZ 15 14 Huntsville, AL 16 8 Bakersfield, CA 17 30 Salt Lake City, UT 18 87 Boise City-Nampa, ID 19 3 Austin-Round Rock, TX 0 58 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 1 8 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 41 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC 3 69 Lafayette, LA 4 143 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA 5 34 Source: Milken Institute Best-Performing Cities: Top 5 According to Index
Executive Summary It s no coincidence that regions home to top-ranking metros show entrepreneurial strength, lower business costs, and favorable business climates. Several of the technology centers are supported by strong university programs, providing the human capital and intellectual property necessary to thrive in today s rapidly changing, knowledge-intensive economy. The South has fifteen metros among the top twenty-five slots, including those six in Florida. Wilmington, North Carolina, rose to nd place in the index overall, aided by port activity and increases in communication services. Another North Carolina metro, Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, ranks among the top twenty-five, at 3rd. Ten metros in the West place among the top twentyfive, led by four in California (Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario; Bakersfield; Vallejo-Fairfield; and Sacramento). Phoenix scores 4th in the overall index; and Las Vegas remains among the best performers, at 9th place. We have adjusted the timing of the report s release in order to incorporate all available 006 data. The previous index, released in February 006, was titled Best-Performing Cities. Best-Performing City: Ocala, Florida Ocala leaps into the top spot in the Best-Performing Cities Index, up from 13th in the previous index. It owes its position to consistent, top-ten growth rankings across specific categories, such as wages and technology output. Perhaps most impressive is Ocala s job growth, which averaged 5.8 percent from 004 through 006. Ocala shared in the Florida housing boom witnessed from 00 through 006. Its proximity to Disney World links its economic fate with the travel-and-tourism sector. But unlike many other Florida metros, Ocala has greater dependence on the manufacturing industry, where Lockheed Martin s circuit-board facility is a technology anchor. Coupled with Cingular Wireless operations, this technological presence boosts Ocala s ranking to nd in the country for high-tech output growth over the past five years. The Ten Largest Cities Because America s largest metropolitan areas experience high density and minimal space for expansion, we break out their performances separately. It isn t reasonable to expect cities like Los Angeles, New York, or Chicago to grow at the same rate as Boise, Austin, or Provo. However, the big metro areas could learn something from the favorable business climates promoted by these fastgrowing areas. Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, California, supplants the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area as the best-performing large metro area of. It also scores an impressive 3rd overall among the 00 largest metro economies. Despite a recent slowdown in residential construction, the area s employment, along with wage and salary growth, has been one of the highest in the nation over the past five years. Its growing presence as a transportation and cargo hub links it to global markets, particularly in Asia. (The transportation sector includes an international airport in Ontario, which 3
Biggest Gainers Biggest Gainers The biggest gainers on the Best-Performing Cities Index are metros that share a number of strengths, including recovery in the tech sector, particularly among areas that suffered tremendous losses in the aftermath of the dot-com era. Several metros have also benefited from rising energy prices and, as a result, have expanded refinery capacity and oil and gas exploration. Relocation of residents from Gulf Coast cities ravaged by Hurricane Katrina has boosted population and demand for consumer-driven industries in nearby metros. Finally, a weaker dollar has helped to facilitate increased economic activity in port cities. The most notable increase in the rankings is claimed by Lafayette, Louisiana, which rose 119 spots, from, 143rd to 4th, due to a post-hurricane Katrina population influx. Other New Orleans-area residents relocated to Baton Rouge, Louisiana, triggering its climb from 13nd place to 67th in the rankings. Lafayette s diverse industry mix has provided new residents and displaced companies a host of opportunities. In addition, as domestic oil supply tightens, expansion of the metro s energy sector will be aided by increased oil exploration along the Gulf Coast. Biggest Gainers Change in ings Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) Spots Climbed Lafayette, LA 4 143 +119 Peoria, IL 68 168 +100 Mobile, AL 88 186 +98 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 3 19 +97 Corpus Christi, TX 65 158 +93 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 85 167 +8 Tulsa, OK 98 180 +8 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 107 185 +78 San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, CA* 97 173 +76 Wichita, KS 114 189 +75 Salt Lake City, UT 18 87 +69 Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX* 59 15 +66 Baton Rouge, LA 67 13 +65 Columbia, SC 69 134 +65 Rockford, IL 13 190 +58 Wilmington, NC 59 +57 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA 38 95 +57 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC 11 178 +57 Asheville, NC 117 171 +54 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 101 153 +5 Source: Milken Institute *Indicates Metropolitan Division Other metros benefiting from the energy boom are primarily in Texas: namely Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown (from 19th to 3nd), Corpus Christi (from 158th to 65th), and Beaumont- Port Arthur (from 167th to 85th). Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown has experienced tremendous post-katrina population growth. Industries that support the energy sector, such as fabricated metal 9
Best-Performing Large Cities Thousands 7 6 5 4 3 Ocala - L Florida - R Residential Permits Ocala vs. Florida Thousands 0 00 180 160 140 10 001 00 003 004 Sources: Moody's Economy.com, Milken Institute 006 100 Professional services and business services have expanded at a rapid pace. Data processing has been the main reason for the stellar performance in the latter category. Warehousing and storage is another source of growth. The Ocala metro area is increasingly tied to the fortunes of the Orlando tourism sector, with many residents commuting to its popular destinations. The housing correction will restrain growth over the next couple of years, but Ocala should remain in the upper tier of performers. Wilmington, North Carolina, is a new entrant into the upper echelon of performers, jumping from 59th in the previous index to nd for. Unlike most areas of the country this year, Wilmington s economy hasn t lost much momentum. Port-related activity is booming after capacity was added with a new, deeper channel. Renewed interest in nuclear energy has provided a commercial opportunity for GE Energy as it consolidates design operations in Wilmington. The area ranks 15th in job growth over the past five years. Leisure and Hospitality Employment Wilmington vs. United States, 006 Percent Share of Total Employment 15 14 13 1 11 10 9 Wilmington, NC Sources: Moody's Economy.com, Milken Institute United States 14
Best-Performing Large Cities Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) Ocala, FL 1 13 Wilmington, NC 59 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 3 10 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 4 15 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL 5 6 Naples-Marco Island, FL 6 3 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 7 4 Provo-Orem, UT 8 3 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 9 11 Raleigh-Cary, NC 10 45 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC 11 35 Charleston-North Charleston, SC 1 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 13 Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL 14 4 Tucson, AZ 15 14 Huntsville, AL 16 8 Bakersfield, CA 17 30 Salt Lake City, UT 18 87 Boise City-Nampa, ID 19 3 Austin-Round Rock, TX 0 58 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 1 8 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 41 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC 3 69 Lafayette, LA 4 143 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA 5 34 Source: Milken Institute Best-Performing Cities: Top 5 According to Index 34
Best-Performing Cities: Largest 00 Cities Best-Performing Cities Largest Cities, Top 00 Metropolitan Area 5-Yr Job Growth 001-006 1-Yr Job Growth -006 5-Yr Wages/Salaries Growth 000-1-Yr Wages/Salaries Growth 004- Job Growth (3/06-3/07) 5-Yr Relative HT GDP Growth 001-006 1-Yr Relative HT GDP Growth -006 Population 006 006 Value 006 Value Value Value Growth 006 Value 006 Value 006 Value 006 Value (Thousands) High-Tech GDP LQ # of HT GDP LQs Over 1 Overall Index 13 1 Ocala, FL MSA 119.14 8 10.99 8 1.15 8 104.99 9 1.88% 61 169.84 106.77 6 0.81 85 9 36 316 100 59 Wilmington, NC MSA 11.37 15 103.19 7 111.44 33 104.48 1 4.48% 5 141.59 6 104.7 15 0.87 73 5 96 36 105.4 10 3 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA MSA 119.51 7 10.14 17 16.41 4 103.06 5 3.45% 16 1.59 18 105.04 13 0.6 130 7 6 4,06 113.71 15 4 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ MSA 114.81 11 104.06 3 110.97 34 105.05 7 4.1% 8 93.33 134 104.0 17 1.15 46 7 6 4,039 11. 6 5 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL MSA 113.84 1 10.08 1 116.36 13 104.81 11.93% 4 113.38 31 101.80 43 0.88 7 6 79 1,985 11.93 3 6 Naples-Marco Island, FL MSA 1.90 103.43 6 135.66 105.86 6.07% 46 136.63 8 105.88 9 0.41 18 4 115 315 137.87 4 7 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX MSA 10.73 5 10.11 19 1.68 7 103.07 4.63% 3 183.4 1 107.30 5 0.44 178 4 115 701 148.98 3 8 Provo-Orem, UT MSA 111.36 19 103.51 4 104.44 76 103.03 7 5.58% 3 111.75 35 98.9 101 1.41 30 8 5 474 150.10 11 9 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV MSA 1.40 4 103.50 5 16.3 5 106.31 4 3.3% 18 116.3 5 101.95 39 0.4 181 173 1,778 154.09 45 10 Raleigh-Cary, NC MSA 107.33 31 10.67 13 105.6 70 101.70 4 3.46% 15 101.50 85 103.8 1 1.50 0 10 8 995 156.57 35 11 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC MSA 117.74 9 104.08 111.51 3 103.11 6.8% 1 103.54 67 110.64 0.41 183 3 151 38 168.36 1 Charleston-North Charleston, SC MSA 107.13 3 100.50 63 113.7 1 10.55 30 3.63% 13 118.67 105.66 10 0.65 13 5 96 603 179.45 13 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL MSA 17.17 1 10.81 11 14.30 1 107.10 3.03% 93.80 13 99.70 83 0.45 175 4 115 571 18.05 4 14 Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL MSA 119.81 6 101.55 3 115.46 17 105.91 5 1.51% 91 135.94 9 103.98 19 0.55 148 4 115 683 186.96 14 15 Tucson, AZ MSA 106.77 35 101.7 30 110.45 39 10.40 33 3.1% 19 7.56 196 101.76 45 1.1 41 11 17 946 19.63 8 16 Huntsville, AL MSA 105.7 44 100.79 47 109.68 46 101.37 57.38% 38 118.6 3 99.07 97.10 6 9 36 377 197.68 30 17 Bakersfield, CA MSA 111.37 18 10.87 9 115.51 16 103.49 19.47% 37 98.38 11 101.40 47 0.5 158 4 115 780 198.35 87 18 Salt Lake City, UT MSA 103.76 61 10.74 1 101.3 110 10.53 31 4.4% 6 106.30 58 100.05 71 1.04 56 11 17 1,068 0.65 3 19 Boise City-Nampa, ID MSA 111.7 17 104.3 1 101.86 10 103.04 6 5.04% 4 118.96 1 94.91 185 1.44 9 4 115 568 04.86 58 0 Austin-Round Rock, TX MSA 103.38 63 10.1 18 94.6 170 103.0 1 4.34% 7 105.01 6 100.95 56 1.75 1 11 17 1,514.71 8 1 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO MSA 116.45 10 101.44 35 15.67 6 103.09 3 1.79% 7 139.16 7 97.44 131 0.50 163 4 115 41 3.06 41 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA MSA 107.8 7 99.99 97 114.01 0 100.6 86.75% 30 134.77 11 101.88 41 0.80 89 7 6 41 8.8 69 3 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC MSA 103.06 70 101.87 5 104.48 75 10.43 3.76% 9 108.91 50 106.9 8 0.76 97 4 115 1,583 30.98 143 4 Lafayette, LA MSA 10.9 74 10.84 10 108.67 49 103.65 16.80% 6 19.85 15 96.63 155 0.71 109 4 115 54 34.50 34 5 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA MSA 106.44 39 100.35 73 111.7 30 101. 60.0% 51 104.5 64 101.1 5 1.00 60 7 6,067 34.84 1 6 Reno-Sparks, NV MSA 108.54 5 101.90 3 110.87 36 101.34 58.74% 31 107.18 56 98.06 10 0.48 168 6 79 401 4.34 38 7 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA MSA 103.04 71 100.47 66 11.76 5 101.56 48 1.8% 108 100.76 95 103.13 5 1.66 14 13 10 800 46.44 33 8 Lakeland, FL MSA 113.16 13 101.41 37 110.89 35 104.83 10 1.9% 59 101.45 86 103.1 3 0.36 194 173 56 46.97 31 9 Greeley, CO MSA 109.07 3 10.09 0 110.07 4 101.51 5 4.01% 10 79.50 185 10.16 36 0.5 155 4 115 37 47.5 5 30 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL MSA 11.99 14 100.59 58 116.81 1 101.71 41 0.96% 14 110.66 43 10.91 8 0.65 119 5 96 497 47.39 43 19 44 78 31 3 33 34 Albuquerque, NM MSA Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX MSA Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX MSA Savannah, GA MSA 104.69 103.3 104.15 110.97 5 66 57 0 101.77 10.5 99.41 101.69 9 14 136 31 106.34 104.4 118.5 107.47 65 79 10 55 100.7 103.0 105.0 10.18 9 35 Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL MD 110.00 100.0 96 115.10 18 104.00 15 0.93% 16 111.75 34 97.39 134 0.83 79 7 6 1,788 7.33 7 36 West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Boynton Beach, FL MD 110.14 1 100.38 68 11.19 7 104.07 13.03% 49 84.49 166 98.3 117 0.61 134 5 96 1,74 73.78 7 37 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV MD 106.66 36 99.95 100 110.3 40 101.57 47 1.61% 83 106. 59 96.64 154 1.6 15 10 8 4,135 74.03 95 38 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA MSA 101.73 86 101.34 39 96.09 15 101.10 6.08% 45 14.54 5 100.93 57 1.81 10 8 5,138 81.9 51 39 Jacksonville, FL MSA 106.60 37 101.31 40 109.95 43 101.46 54.00% 5 10.7 74 98.89 10 0.65 119 3 151 1,78 83.10 56 40 Honolulu, HI MSA 106.34 41 100.50 6 110.54 38 100.95 68 1.95% 56 103.04 71 10.81 30 0.5 154 4 115 910 83.90 1 41 Port St. Lucie, FL MSA 1.81 3 10.1 15 130.65 3 106.67 3-0.1% 188 99.7 107 104.01 18 0.43 179 173 39 83.98 39 4 Ogden-Clearfield, UT MSA 106.95 34 101.79 7 107.45 56 99.30 11 3.0% 3 110.58 45 98.66 109 0.68 114 4 115 498 85.46 57 43 San Antonio, TX MSA 104.7 54 101.87 4 107.70 5 100.88 70.51% 34 87.68 160 97.3 136 0.88 71 6 79 1,94 88.16 5 44 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL MSA 107.13 33 100.1 80 106.45 64 101.85 39 1.% 114 101.51 84 100.09 68 0.94 68 9 36,698 89. 67 45 Visalia-Porterville, CA MSA 108.78 4 10.16 16 111.65 31 10.0 37.14% 44 100.10 99 94.71 188 0.5 199 3 151 40 96.8 0 46 Clarksville, TN-KY MSA 105.63 46 99.77 11 11.43 9 108.10 1.% 4 107.37 55 96.46 158 0.50 16 3 151 40 98.11 77 47 Springfield, MO MSA 106.43 40 101.03 44 105.89 68 100.98 66 1.94% 57 130.77 14 96.09 167 0.65 11 5 96 407 99.03 1 48 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL MSA 108.48 6 100.10 89 115.67 15 10.19 34-0.05% 18 10.77 73 96.37 163 1.50 1 13 10 534 30.80 17 49 Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, CA MD 104.1 59 100.11 87 109.69 45 101.55 49 0.9% 17 97.3 117 99.71 81 1.36 33 18 1 3,00 305.09 37 50 Tacoma, WA MD 107.81 8 101.10 4 114.3 19 100.66 77 1.55% 89 99.83 10 100.65 59 0.55 149 3 151 767 306.16 96 51 Eugene-Springfield, OR MSA 104.4 55 100.49 64 103.6 88 101.74 40 0.65% 148 133.1 13 10.1 37 1.04 55 6 79 338 307.73 6 5 Gainesville, FL MSA 10.83 76 100.6 76 11.15 8 103.51 18 1.98% 53 99.87 101 97.16 141 0.60 136 4 115 44 313.69 85 53 Lubbock, TX MSA 99.98 11 100.08 91 10.3 97 100.73 73 3.70% 1 17.7 16 99.3 90 1.31 36 5 96 61 318.36 55 54 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL MSA 107.61 9 100.36 70 106.81 61 101.07 64-0.17% 185 133.61 1 103.15 4 0.7 105 8 5 440 319.41 36 55 Trenton-Ewing, NJ MSA 105.79 43 100.63 56 107.16 58 99.8 101 1.8% 69 93.97 130 97.14 14 1.0 43 8 5 368 3.19 63 56 Richmond, VA MSA 10.96 73 99.89 10 105.91 67 101.17 61 1.97% 54 101.96 81 100.61 61 0.79 90 6 79 1,194 33.58 100 57 Salem, OR MSA 104.16 56 100.3 75 103.99 8 101.49 53.15% 43 105.9 60 101. 51 0.61 13 173 385 36.19 6 58 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA MSA 103.16 69 100.63 55 107.55 54 100.35 84.3% 40 109.01 49 99.8 9 0.58 141 3 151 534 37.10 15 59 Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX MD 99.11 13 101.85 6 95.08 165 101.3 59 3.76% 11 91.97 140 98.50 11 1.5 19 14 7 4,019 330.30 80 60 Fort Worth-Arlington, TX MD 101.49 89 100.78 48 10.87 90 100.41 8.0% 50 10.54 75 96.75 151 1.1 47 7 6 1,984 33.38 5 61 Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, TN MSA 104.90 50 100.38 69 104.18 80 101.6 45 1.41% 96 109.7 48 96.45 159 0.71 108 7 6 1,455 333.56 19 6 Camden, NJ MD 104.30 53 99.54 15 108.17 51 99.91 97 1.55% 88 10.9 76 100.83 58 0.84 78 11 17 1,50 333.88 90 63 Merced, CA MSA 107.34 30 99.9 138 113.56 100.68 75.77% 8 97.76 116 111.08 1 0.37 193 173 46 337.1 49 64 Anchorage, AK MSA 106.54 38 99.79 109 11.9 4 100.4 88 1.% 113 108.76 51 98.47 113 0.76 96 6 79 359 341.87 158 65 Corpus Christi, TX MSA 101.4 93 100.4 67 104.3 77 100.04 96.34% 39 111.04 41 10.60 33 0.53 151 4 115 416 34.18 40 66 Fresno, CA MSA 105.88 4 100.67 53 11.61 6 100.16 94 0.74% 141 111.03 4 101.17 54 0.46 173 4 115 89 345.88 13 67 Baton Rouge, LA MSA 104.94 49 101.4 41 10.1 99 101.98 38 1.4% 11 104.70 63 10.79 31 0.50 164 173 767 349.89 168 68 Peoria, IL MSA 99.65 115 100.59 57 106.0 66 104.0 14 0.89% 130 113.8 3 100.64 60 0.56 147 4 115 370 35.90 134 69 Columbia, SC MSA 10.97 7 100.75 49 10.41 94 100.18 91 1.78% 73 108.07 53 10.95 6 0.53 153 3 151 704 360.1 16 70 Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA MSA 100.81 98 98.76 16 107.43 57 101.43 55 1.04% 118 111.45 37 99.16 96 1.44 8 14 7 400 36.81 79 71 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV MSA 103.4 65 99.97 99 107.59 53 101.54 51 0.86% 135 134.89 10 100.53 6 0.51 161 4 115 58 364.31 9 7 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA MSA 103.33 64 99.59 13 108.19 50 99.70 105 0.63% 150 103.41 68 99.71 8 1.55 17 17,941 364.39 94 73 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR MSA 101.8 83 100.69 5 10.60 9 99.16 16 1.30% 106 10.86 7 101.19 53 1.07 5 5 96 653 376.18 106 74 Durham, NC MSA 101.00 95 101.47 34 95.49 160 98.60 148 3.18% 0 89.34 153 98.83 103.14 5 10 8 464 379.94 46 75 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO MSA 10.5 80 99.86 104 101.7 104 100.0 90 1.9% 58 10.6 77 93.9 193 1.46 6 9 36 76 380.16 119 76 Montgomery, AL MSA 101.9 8 100.07 9 104.55 74 99.60 109.05% 47 99.75 103 101.35 48 0.61 134 4 115 36 381.8 17 77 Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA MD 99.03 16 101.55 3 90. 187 100.10 95 3.15% 1 81.0 179 10.04 38.09 7 7 6,497 381.53 18 78 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA MSA 11.09 16 100.64 54 116.8 11 99.84 99 0.8% 171 96.08 10 73.09 199 0.73 104 5 96 41 385.1 35 85 0 8 1.84% 3.35% 1.54%.5% 65 17 90 41 113.79 96.8 146.8 111.63 36 9 118 4 96.34 100.7 10.95 96.38 164 66 7 16.18 0.83 0.8 0.67 4 80 8 115 1 3 5 13 151 96 173 817 5,540 351 30 53.5 54.38 56.10 67.83 1 Indicates this city s position on previous year s largest metros list Indicates this city s position on previous year s smallest metros list 47