The Fukushima nuclear accident

Similar documents
Japan s Nuclear Accident - Update - June 7, 2011 Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Government of Japan

The Accident at Fukushima

Outline of TEPCO Fukushima NPP accident

Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami, Fukushima Daiichi NPP Accident (1/5)

Indoor Radon: A Public Health Perspective

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN NOVEMBER 2018

Regulatory Actions Taken after Fukushima

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN FEBRUARY 2018

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN OCTOBER 2017

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN JANUARY 2018

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN NOVEMBER 2017

Nuclear Emergency Exercise of NPPs in Japan. IAEA/ANSN/EPR-TG Workshop. October, 2013

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS IN ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN FEBRUARY 2011

The Japanese Radiological Event at Fukushima Plant 1 (Daiichi)

NUCLEAR PROBLEMS WITH THE JAPAN DISASTER. Yasuhiro Otomo, MD. PhD.

Context Scope Procurement approach Topics for discussions Timeline. EDA/ESA UAS Workshop May

TAIEX. Institution Building support for Agriculture and Rural Development by Twinning and TAIEX. Institution Building Unit DG Enlargement

Overview of the ATC activities

CCBE LAWYERS STATISTICS 2016

Observation of the Exercise Objects, Locations, Points and Program on Day2 - Observers Manual -

CEFS SUGAR STATISTICS 2010

An overview of Tallinn tourism trends

March 2015 compared with February 2015 Volume of retail trade down by 0.8% in euro area Down by 0.6% in EU28

LifeWatch, costing and funding. The LifeWatch e-infrastructure financial issues

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL

Table I. General questions

MAIS3+ assessment: Current practices around Europe

Dr. Violeta Vinceviciene, DG ENV D.2

Legal and Institutional Aspects of ATM in Europe. Roderick D. van Dam Head of Legal Service EUROCONTROL

Now and Future: Looking at Fukushima

Dr. Yoichi Watanabe, M.D. Fukushima Red Cross Hospital. Vice President Director General (Dept. of Neurosurgery) Fukushima Red Cross Hospital

Japan s Challenges Towards Recovery

JAR-145: APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS. Please find attached a copy of Amendment 6 to JAR-145, effective 1 November 2004.

Great East Japan Earthquake Kimiaki Nagashima

JOINT AUTHORITIES FOR RULEMAKING OF UNMANNED SYSTEMS. Mike Lissone Secretary General JARUS

GODINA XI SARAJEVO, BROJ 2 TOURISM STATISTICS. Tourism in BIH, February 2017

Fuel consumption & fuel cost for different vessel types and Member States Key message

Tourist arrivals and overnight stays in collective accommodation 1 July 2017 (p)

Radiation, Dangerous Goods, All Hazards Dr Anthony Evans Chief, Aviation Medicine Section International Civil Aviation Organization Montreal, Canada

BILFINGER SE NUCLEAR ENERGY PROJECTS: WE MAKE IT WORK FROM ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY TO FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION AND SERVICES

PRESS RELEASE No. 24 of February 3, 2014 Tourism December and the Year 2013

EUROCONTROL. Visit of the Transport Attachés. 10 April Frank Brenner. Director General EUROCONTROL

Slovene Perspective on Mobility in Europe and its Reflection on Countries in the Danube Region

Fukushima Meltdown: The World's First Earthquake-Tsunami-Nuclear Disaster By Takashi Hirose

P. Gaubert, A. Funayama and H. Moriya (School of Engineering, Tohoku University)

Industrial Statistics of Lifts and Escalators. Ebru Gemici-Loukas, VDMA ASANSÖR, Istanbul 27. March 2015

3. Nuclear Power Stations Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station

ROAD SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND DATA SYSTEMS

SHIP SANITATION TRAINING NETWORK No

European General Aviation Conference Schonhagen Airport. Martin Robinson CEO AOPA UK Deputy Vice President IAOPA Europe Berlin 15 th May 2006

Common Market Organisation (CMO) Fruit and vegetables sector Evolution of EU prices of some F&V products

InterFAB Ops meeting Traffic volatility in Brussels hotspot sectors

Load-following capabilities of Nuclear Power Plants. Erik Nonbøl

Adequate information for tourism will help us to:

Survey on arrivals and overnight stays of tourists, total 2017

October 2013 compared with September 2013 Industrial production down by 1.1% in euro area Down by 0.7% in EU28

FINLAND. Table 1. FDI flows in the host economy, by geographical origin. (Millions of US dollars)

assists in the development of airport capacity to meet growing demand supports the development of improved ground access to airports

Situation and response of JAEA to the Earthquake in Northeastern Japan (Outline of activities on March 11-18)

Danube River Basin. a source for transboundary cooperation. Exploring the Results and Potential for Transboundary Water Management Cooperation

EU-Russia summit Strong recovery of trade in goods between EU27 and Russia in 2011 An EU27 deficit of 91 bn euro with Russia in 2011

% change vs. Dec ALL VISITS (000) 2,410 12% 7,550 5% 31,148 1% Spend ( million) 1,490 15% 4,370-1% 18,710 4%

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

Please find attached a copy of JAR-66 Amendment 2 dated February 2007.

February 18 (Monday) February 17 (Sunday) Pre-Registration and Orientation

Network Management, building on our experience of flow management and network planning.

First Meeting of Advisory Committee

SLOVAKIA. Table 1. FDI flows in the host economy, by geographical origin. (Millions of US dollars)

Digital Advertising in Europe. Daniel Knapp

The economic impact of ATC strikes in Europe Key findings from our updated report for A4E

JAR-147: APPROVED MAINTENANCE TRAINING/EXAMINATIONS. Please find attached a copy of JAR-147 Amendment 3 dated February 2007.

ICPDR FP-EG project overview

Überlegungen zu einer EU weiten Versorgung mit intermittierenden Strom quellen F. Wagner, IPP Greifswald

SES Performance Scheme

CABOTAGE GUIDELINES. Hauliers from Croatia are covered by a ban on cabotage until the end of June 2017.

JAR-21: CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES FOR AIRCRAFT AND RELATED PRODUCTS AND PARTS. Please find attached a copy of JAR-21 Amendment 7 dated February 2007.

Load-following capabilities of nuclear power plants

irport atchment rea atabase

Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident

WHO SITREP NO 10 SITUATION SUMMARY

Onholiday, EUR100 are worth

Cover Pool ( mn.) 4, , , , , ,494.6 of which derivatives ( mn.)

Transboundary River Management in the Danube Basin

7 th SESSION OF THE MEETING OF THE PARTIES December 2018, Durban, South Africa

EO Contribution to Recovery Activities - A case study on the experience of the Great East Japan Earthquake -

7 th SESSION OF THE MEETING OF THE PARTIES December 2018, Durban, South Africa

Travel Policy Fly America Act Compliance Presentation. Presented by: Travel Services

European Chernobyl Week 2014

BUSINESS AVIATION TRAFFIC TRACKER EUROPE. June 2018

IMD World Talent Report Factor 1 : Investment and Development

INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL AND TOURISM

REVIEW 2017 NOVEMBER 12 18, HANOVER

International Operations: NATA 2012 Air Charter Summit

INTOUR Update. Aligning Travelife with the EU Ecolabel and identifying further opportunities for collaboration

Economic and Social Council

The Nordic Countries in an International Comparison. Helga Kristjánsdóttir 20. apríl 2012


Please find attached a copy of JAR-25 Amendment 20 dated December 2007.

BUSINESS AVIATION TRAFFIC TRACKER EUROPE. May 2018

Fly America and Open Skies. For Travel on Federal Sponsored Awards

Transcription:

European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 1 The Fukushima nuclear accident What happened? Consequences? JRC involvement? Marc Noël Joint Research Center Institute for Energy Marc.NOEL@ec.europa.eu https://clearinghouse-oef.jrc.ec.europa.eu/

European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 2 What happened at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant on 11 March 2011? Initiating event : magnitude 9,0 earthquake

NPP affected by the earthquake European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 3

Tsunami generated by the earthquake European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 4

Many significant aftershocks European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 5

The Fukushima Daiichi site European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 6 Source: AREVA.

European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 7

Shared spent fuel storage European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 8 Before / after tsunami Tank displaced? Many structures facing the bay are destroyed Missing tanks

European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 9

European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 10

«GE Mark I»design European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 11

Event sequence (1) European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 12 Diesel generators start. Plant is in a stable state.

Event sequence (2) European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 13 Reactors 1-3 are cut-off from any kind of heat removal.

Event sequence (5) European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 14 Core starts to be exposed

Event sequence (6) European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 15 Cladding temperature rises At 900 C: balooning, cladding breaking At 1200 C: exothermic reaction Zr+2H2O ZrO2+2H2 At 1800 C: melting of fuel cladding and steel structures. At 2500 C: breaking of the fuel rods, debris bed inside the core. Pressure increase inside containment up to 8b->venting Supply of seawater to the reactor stops the core melt >900 C >1200 C >2500 C H2 H2 N2

Event sequence Units 1&3 European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 16

Service floor (top of the reactor building) European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 17

Event sequence Unit 2 European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 18

After the Hydrogen detonations European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 19

European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 20 After the Hydrogen detonations Unit 4 Unit 3

Fuel storage issue? (units 1 to 4) European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 21 Unit 4: a visual inspection by remote controlled camera has shown no significant damage to the spent fuel pond. Unit 3: Fuel stored in the pond not visible beneath a mass of steel beams, concrete, dust and rebar from the explosive destruction of the reactor building roof. Concrete dust appeared thick on the surface of flat objects and specks of dust were circulating in the warm water of the pond. [WNN]

European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 22 Example of recovery actions (1)

European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 23 Example of recovery actions (2)

Water spray SFP4 using mobile truck European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 24 Temporary shelter (unit1, in project) Example of recovery actions (3)

Summary of the situation European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 25 Unit 1 2 3 4 5 6 Core and fuel integrity (loaded fuel assemblies) Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity Damaged most part Damage and leakage estimated Damaged most part Damage and leakage estimated Damaged most part Damage and leakage estimated No fuel in the reactor Not Damaged Not Damaged Not Damaged Not Damaged Not Damaged Containment Integrity Damage and leakage estimated Damage and leakage suspected Damage and leakage suspected Not Damaged Not Damaged Not Damaged Reactor building integrity Severely Damaged Slightly Damaged Severely Damaged Severely Damaged Vent hole opened on the rooftop for avoiding hydrogen explosion Water injection to core Continuing (Freshwater) Continuing (Freshwater) Continuing (Freshwater) Not necessary Not necessary Not necessary Water injection to Containment Vessel Feed water Feed water (planned) Feed water (planned) Not necessary Not necessary Not necessary Fuel integrity in the spent fuel pool (Stored fuel assemblies) Unknown (292) Unknown (587) Damage suspected (514) Damage suspected (1331) Not damaged (946) Not damaged (876) Electric power supply off-site grid available off-site grid available off-site grid available off-site grid available off-site grid available off-site grid available

What are the radiological consequences? European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 26

European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 27

European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 28 11/03: evacuation inside 3km. 12/03 (increase RCV pressure venting): evacuation inside 10km. 13/03 (explosion @ unit1): evacuation inside 20km (170000 residents) + iodine prophylaxis. 25 detected contaminated and decontaminated. 15/03: sheltering 30km + no fly zone. 31/03: significant radioactivity level detected in a village at 40km CIPR recommends to take protective measures when the yearly estimated dose is > 20-100 msv. Based on local monitoring, extension of the evacuation zone decided. The new evacuation zone match +- the 20mSv yearly dose zone.

European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 29

European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 30 blabla

European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 31

Example of food bans European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 32

European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 33

European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 34

High Level EC Task Force for the follow-up of the EU answer to the nuclear accident in Japan European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 35 Created on 30/05/2011 (SEC(2011) 706) Main objectives : To oversee the implementation of the stress tests, with a view to reporting on the process to the next European Council meeting of 9/12/2011. To analyse the radiation protection measures taken so far and propose corrective measures if needed. Membership: Chair: the DG of DG ENER. Vice-Chair: the DG of DG JRC ENER, JRC, SANCO, TAXUD, MOVE, RTD, DEVCO, SG, others Key milestones: KoM of the High Level EC Task Force on 08/06/2011. 15 Sep: national progress reports from the national Regulators sent to EC 15 Nov: EC viewpoint on the process draft report for the European Council 9 Dec: European Council End of 2011: final national reports opening the door for the peer reviews 30 April 2012: completion of peer reviews. June 2012: consolidated EC report to the Council.

EU NPP safety assessments: JRC role? European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 36 Main role: support to the EC High Level Task Force (expertise in nuclear safety) The European Clearinghouse on Operational Experience Feedback for NPP The European Clearinghouse for NPP OEF : a centralized initiative aiming at strenghtening OEF in the EU, to the benefit of the participating EU Safety Authorities, in close collaboration with and their Technical Support Organisations (TSOs).

Organisation European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 37 EU Safety Authorities Members Finland Hungary Lithuania The Netherlands Romania Slovenia Switzerland Observers Belgium Bulgaria Czech Republic France Germany Slovakia Spain Sweden United Kingdom OEF Clearinghouse Centralized Office (JRC) Coordination & Communication Technical & Scientific work OE knowledge repository Main deliverables: -Topical reports - Quarterly reports on events - Improved draft IRS reports International Community IAEA OECD-NEA EU Technical Support Organizations IRSN, GRS Bel-V + Areva

Role of the JRC in the EU NPP «stress tests» European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 38 Expertise of the JRC in the field: JRC has a long tradition of providing technical support in nuclear safety (TACIS-INSC, PHARE-IPA, EURATOM art.41-45 for new NPPs, OSART missions, design review in Ukraine, ) JRC has expertise on the different types of power reactors being operated in the EU (PWR including VVERs, BWRs, CANDU,...). Through the European Clearinghouse, JRC has the expertise of the analysis of nuclear events and accidents. In full cooperation with the EUMS nuclear Safety Authorities and TSOs. The JRC has expertise in the assessment of seismic and flooding hazards.

Role of the JRC in the EU NPP «stress tests» European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 39 JRC gives its full support to the stress tests JRC has contributed to the definition of the scope and methodology for the stress tests and will further contribute to: the definition of common criteria the peer-reviews. (reminder: 1 peer review team per EU MS operating NPP; 7 experts per team: 6 from MS safety authorities + 1 from EC-JRC). JRC will collect all the national reports for the EC JRC will contribute to the report of the EC to the European Council (see conclusions of the European Council of 24-25th March 2011) The JRC can/will support any international safety and risk analysis in neighboring countries, in partnership with the IAEA.

European Clearinghouse on OE Presentation to ITRE on the Fukushima nuclear accident 12/07/2011 - Brussels 40 SOURCES: GRS, IRSN, TEPCO, NISA, MEXT, AREVA, ASN, IAEA, VGB, US-NRC,JAIF.