UDPP SESAR 1 Step2. Concept in brief VP730 Demo

Similar documents
Minimizing the Cost of Delay for Airspace Users

Cooperative traffic management

Operations Control Centre perspective. Future of airline operations

This is an electronic version of a paper presented at The Sixth SESAR Innovation Days. Delft, Netherlands, 07 to 11 Nov 2016, Eurocontrol.

Future Network Manager Methods

SESAR Solutions. Display Options

AOP-NOP Integration. Airports CDM Information Exchange Dr. Alexandra von Eckartsberg

Paradigm SHIFT. Eurocontrol Experimental Centre Innovative Research June, Laurent GUICHARD (Project Leader, ATM) Sandrine GUIBERT (ATC)

Minimizing the Cost of Delay for Airspace Users

Seen through an IATA lens A-CDM Globally

Air Traffic Flow & Capacity Management Frederic Cuq

ART Workshop Airport Capacity

The SESAR Airport Concept

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management

Efficiency and Automation

Demand capacity balancing in a dynamic fashion. Sonke Mahlich, EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre

An optimization model for assigning 4Dtrajectories to flights under the TBO concept

Airport-CDM Workshop. Stephane Durand Co-chair CANSO CDM sub-group International Affairs DSNA

Workshop. SESAR 2020 Concept. A Brief View of the Business Trajectory

Current practice of separation delivery at major European airports ATM R&D Seminar, June 2015, Lisbon

A-CDM FOR REGIONAL AIRPORTS CONCEPT VALIDATION DOCUMENTO PÚBLICO

1) Complete the Queuing Diagram by filling in the sequence of departing flights. The grey cells represent the departure slot (10 pts)

Paradigm SHIFT. EEC Innovative Research Dec, Laurent GUICHARD (Project Leader, ATM) Sandrine GUIBERT (ATC) Horst HERING (Engineering)

Validation Results of Airport Total Operations Planner Prototype CLOU. FAA/EUROCONTROL ATM Seminar 2007 Andreas Pick, DLR

Airbus, Airbus Defence & Space, Lufthansa Systems, Sabre Airline Solutions, Honeywelll

Multi Nodal Regional ATFM/CDM Concept and Operational Trials Colombo 7 May 2014

i4d A MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE GROUND AND AIRBORNE ASPECTS Michel Procoudine Lionel Rouchouse Thales

ACI EUROPE POSITION PAPER

AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT INDIA S PERSPECTIVE. Vineet Gulati GM(ATM-IPG), AAI

International Civil Aviation Organization

A FOCUS ON TACTICAL ATFM. ICAO ATFM Workshop Beijing, 29 th -30 th October 2014

Introduction Runways delay analysis Runways scheduling integration Results Conclusion. Raphaël Deau, Jean-Baptiste Gotteland, Nicolas Durand

Abstract. Introduction

INTRODUCTION OF AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (A-CDM) AT SINGAPORE CHANGI AIRPORT

A NextGen Mental Shift: The role of the Flight Operations Center in a Transformative National Airspace System. By: Michael Wambsganss Oct 11, 2012

EUROCONTROL Specification for Time Based Separation (TBS) for Final Approach

D3.1 Architecture definition

The Network Manager User Forum 2017

Initial Airport Operations Plan Introduction Luc Laveyne SDM airport liaison and managing. 8 September Hosted by SDAG.

Step 1 V3 UDPP Final OSED

AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (A-CDM): IATA RECOMMENDATIONS

REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE SINGAPORE CHANGI AIRPORT P.O. BOX 1, SINGAPORE

A-CDM AT HONG KONG INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (HKIA)

Work Package Final Report

MET matters in SESAR. Dennis HART

ANNEX ANNEX. to the. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU).../...

Intentionally left blank

CENTRAL AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT ( C-ATFM ) INDIA CATFM. ATFM Global Symposium /22/2017 ATFM Global Symposium 2017

InterFAB Cooperation: XMAN Implementing Extended Cross-Border Arrival Management. World ATM Congress Madrid, 8 March 2016

Network Manager Adding value to the Network 29 September 2011

The flow centric approach :

B0 FRTO, B0-NOPS, B0-ASUR and B0-ACAS Implementation in the AFI and MID Regions

Changi Airport A-CDM Handbook

Eric Silverman American Airlines Mgr. ATC/Airfield Ops.: PHL/NY & NE. June 22, 2016

Performance Indicator Horizontal Flight Efficiency

Follow up to the implementation of safety and air navigation regional priorities XMAN: A CONCEPT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF ATFCM CROSS-BORDER EXCHANGES

AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT

ATSAW. (Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness) Presented by Laurent VIDAL - Surveillance systems manager Support to sales & programs

South African ATFM & A-CDM - Progress and Integration Status. Mikateko Chabani

Ultra s Experience with A-CDM

Presented at the 3rd INFORM Airline Forum, Lisbon, May 2015.

Airport Slot Capacity: you only get what you give

DMAN-SMAN-AMAN Optimisation at Milano Linate Airport

Schedule Compression by Fair Allocation Methods

Crosswind dependent separations and update on TBS concept (transitional step)

Performance monitoring report 2017/18

Next Generation Airspace Developments: Key Operational Trends and Enablers

Ground movement safety systems and procedures - an overview

SESAR ANNUAL DEMO WORKSHOP. Toulouse, October 2014 Day 2: New Project Plans

Nikolaos Papagiannopoulos. Juan Francisco García Lopez

SESAR CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT: AN ANSP CASE STUDY. Owen DAVIES Brussels Representative Department of International Affairs, NATS

ECOsystem: MET-ATM integration to improve Aviation efficiency

Traffic Flow Management

DFLEX (DEPARTURE FLEXIBILITY) When Airport CDM becomes a reality!

FAA Surface CDM. Collaborative Decision Making and Airport Operations. Date: September 25-27, 2017

Managing And Understand The Impact Of Of The Air Air Traffic System: United Airline s Perspective

MIT ICAT. Robust Scheduling. Yana Ageeva John-Paul Clarke Massachusetts Institute of Technology International Center for Air Transportation

FRA CDM. Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Flight Crew Briefing FRANKFURT AIRPORT. German Harmonisation

SESAR RPAS Definition Phase Results & Way Forward. Denis Koehl Senior Advisor SESAR Joint Undertaking

Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Operations Guidelines Version Date: 2017/07/21

D02 - Phase 1 - System Requirements Specification

EVP EMAN Prototype Specification Document

Modernising UK Airspace 2025 Vision for Airspace Tools and Procedures. Controller Pilot Symposium 24 October 2018

Need for Data: A User s Perspective

Lufthansa Systems, Sabre Airline Solutions, Honeywell, Airbus Defence and Space, Airbus.

PBN and RNAV concepts

AERONAUTICAL SERVICES ADVISORY MEMORANDUM (ASAM) Focal Point : Gen

ATTEND Analytical Tools To Evaluate Negotiation Difficulty

Fair Allocation Concepts in Air Traffic Management

European ATM Development The Big Idea

Work Package Final Report

NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES

Annual Report 2017 KPI

ENABLING GREENER FLIGHT TRAJECTORIES. David Bowen Chief of ATM SESAR JU

The Third ATS Coordination Meeting of Bay of Bengal, Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean (BOBASIO) Region Hyderabad, India, 22 nd to 24 th October 2013.

Workshop on the Performance Enhancement of the ANS through the ICAO ASBU framework. Dakar, Senegal, September 2017 presented by Emeric Osmont

A TARGET WINDOWS MODEL FOR MANAGING 4-D TRAJECTORY-BASED OPERATIONS

ATFM Update - EUROCONTROL Day 1-16h45

Assessment of the 3D-separation of Air Traffic Flows

Home LIST OF ACRONYMS

Transcription:

UDPP SESAR 1 Step2 Concept in brief VP730 Demo Laurent Guichard Oct-2016 The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation

UDPP Step2 objectives Continue to deeply involve the AUs in ATM solutions Step1: slot swapping Give a mean (tool) to the AUs to decrease the Cost of the Delay. Re-organize their flights in Hotspot Airport congestion -> Holistic (SESAR 2020) UDPP Defines prioritisation rules : To apply Equity To limit Coordination

Cost of Delay for AU? + Cost of delay on 1 flight Slope = punctuality policy Cost disruption due to : PAX flow: Transit, VIP, Rotations, Resources Mgt : CREW constraints, pilots constraints, Maintenance, Curfew.. Delay First max delay target (Margin of manoeuvre 1) 2nd max delay target (Margin of manoeuvre 2) Use of Cost disruptions to find an optimum face to delay In hotspot AU goal: Decrease the Cost of the delay in the hotspot

UDPP Step2 Prioritisation: 2 features: FDA, SFP FDA: Fleet Delay Apportionment Priority values : from 1 (highest) to 9 (lowest) Or B (Baseline). Default value = 5 SFP: Selective Flight Protection A binary approach for flights management (Joker) Suspend or Protect Flights according to Operating Index (severity of the Hotspot)

UDPP Equity All UDPP Concept and features are based on Equity Don t penalize others AU when doing Prioritisation 1. Ration By Effort rules (RBE) (on SFP but also on FDA) First Give (to others), then Get (from others) 2. Sum Baseline delays = Sum UDPP delays (For FDA only) SFP and FDA apply these Equity Rules

UDPP Concept elements: FDA FDA : Fleet Delay Apportionment (with integrated RBE) AU gives priority to their own flights for delay reapportionment according to the need. Take proportion of delay on AU Flights according to given priority UDelay = (BDelay) * ((Prio * BDelay)/ (Prio * BDelay) Priority values : from 1 (highest) to 9 (lowest) given to flights. Implicit value is 5: not specifying a priority means giving 5. B (Baseline) Priority can be set to ignore flights from FDA calculation (keep baseline delay)

FDA (proportion of Delay x Priority ) Original A1 A2 C1 B1 A3 C2 B2 B3 A4 B4 X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 FSFS Seq. A1 A2 C1 B1 A3 C2 B2 B3 A4 B4 X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 Baseline Delay UDPP Concept elements : FDA Hotspot (baseline delay) 0 1 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 1 1 Priority B 9 1 FDA Seq. A1 A2 C1 B1 A4 C2 B2 B3 A3 B4 X1 X2 X3 FDA Delay 0 1 2 3 0 4 4 4 8 4 3 1 1 CoefPrio = Sum(Dly) / Sum(Dly*Prio) = 8/ ((9x4) + (4x1) )= 8/40 A3 delay = Prio*Dly * CoefPrio = 36 * 8/40 = 7.2 A4 delay = Prio*Dly * CoefPrio = 4 * 8/40 = 0.8

SFP : Selective Flight Protection UDPP Concept elements: SFP A binary approach face to big Hotspot AU can Suspend or Protect flights according to the Operating Index (OI) Suspend = Flight will be push at the end of the Hotspot Protect = Flight will be on-time OI defines the minimum credit (OC: Operating Credits) a flight need to be Protected (be on-time).

UDPP Concept elements : SFP Hotspot (baseline delay) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X time First Suspend Hotspot 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X 1 time Suspend 1 Positive impact for all others flights Then Protect Hotspot 2 3 4 8 5 6 7 9 X 1 time Protect 8 Neutral impact for flights between Baseline 8 and Original Schedule 8 Positive impact for all the others

UDPP Concept elements : SFP Operating Credits To spend (OI box) Hotspot OI = 140 Suspend Suspend 300 Protect Protect Protect 200 100 100 60 20 120 80 Time RBE : Prohibited Area

End of the presentation 11

The platform Base on Airport APOC platform (Airbus Defence Space) + Management of Departure and Arrival Sequence With UDPP Prioritisation algorithm and rules + Graphic Interface (FOC oriented) For AUs (5 positions) + Link with SABRE Prototype for Cost calculation (in US)

UDPP Concept availability UDPP Step2 (planning phase) Hotspot : Affected flights = delay > 0 Hotspot declared PDS FDA SFP Step 1 (Slot SWAP) time

CCS, Hotspot, over-delivery recovery period 2. Terminology 7 CCS definition From 0500 to 1520 Over-capacity Hotspot1 Recovery Hotspot2 Back to normal capacity

SFP 3. UDPP Concept elements : SFP Hotspot (baseline delay) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X Suspend Positive impact for others flights Time Hotspot 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X 1 Time Now you can protect N flights according to OI Protect Negative impact for others flights between Baseline and Original Schedule Hotspot 2 3 4 8 5 6 7 9 X 1 Time Neutral impact The combination of the 2 gives neutral impact for flights between original schedule and baseline time and positive for the others

Simple Logical Description of The Recovery period, the SFP and the FDA concepts NB: time values are logical values useful to explain the concept elements (not operational values) Underline colours on results indicate impact to other flights due to FDA or SFP (compare with Baseline Delay) Over-capacity period Recovery period Time 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Original A1 A2 C1 B1 A3 C2 B2 B3 C3 B4 X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 FPFS Seq. A1 A2 C1 B1 A3 C2 B2 B3 C3 B4 X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 Baseline Delay (BD) 0 1 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 1 1 SFP (Flight Protected: Op.Credits = 200 Flight Suspended: Op.Credit=0 ) In this simple example Op. Index =200 Original A1 A2 C1 B1 A3 C2 B2 B3 C3 B4 X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 FPFS Seq. A1 A2 C1 B1 A3 C2 B2 B3 C3 B4 X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 SFP Seq A1 C1 A3 B1 C2 B2 B3 C3 B4 X1 X2 X3 A2 SFP Delay 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 0 0 14 Operating Index (OI) is based on Hotspot severity Operating Credits to fly is = or > to OI Nb of possible promoted flight depend on OI OI = 120 -> 5 possible flights Suspended Flights go at the end of the recovery period FDA (proportion of Delay x Priority + equity rules to build list) Original A1 A2 C1 B1 A3 C2 B2 B3 A4 B4 X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 FPFS Seq. A1 A2 C1 B1 A3 C2 B2 B3 A4 B4 X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 Baseline Delay (BD) 0 1 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 1 1 Priority B B 9 1 New Delay 0 1 2 3 1.5 4 4 4 4 4 3 1 1 CoefPrio = Sum(Dly) / Sum(Dly*Prio) = 8/ ((9x4) + (4x1) )= 8/40 A3 delay = Prio*Dly * CoefPrio = 36 * 8/40 = 7.2 A4 delay = 4 * 8/40 = 0.8 + rules for merging All AU flights (equity) FDA Seq. A1 A2 C1 B1 A4 C2 B2 B3 A3 B4 X1 X2 X3 FDA Delay 0 0 3 2 0 4 4 4 8 4 3 1 1

Concept elements on timeline CCS declared (R-MAN is part of the decision) (Baseline Delay, Recovery period OI value ) CCS UDPP solution Cut-off time (New Schedule: IBT, OBT) Q-Mgt Cut-off time: Optimised sequence Time AIRPORT-ATC R-MAN : (DCB Airport) Q-Mngt Optimisation: PDS A-MAN, D-MAN AUs (UDPP) AU Initial flight Priority (FDA) FDA Light to heavy CCS Severity Use Priority values: already assigned but can be updated SFP Heavy CCS severity Need specific input: Credits Mgt Possible AU Slot SWAP under conditions: A-FLEX D-FLEX Enhanced ATFM Slot SWAP DCB (NET) DCB-NET coordinated solutions HotSpot management TTA DPI