ACES Atomic Clock Ensemble in Space

Similar documents
Payload Adapters and Separation Systems

François CAHUZAC / Arnaud BIARD

The Past, Present, and Future of Nortek and Glider Measurements

Flight management during Concordiasi campaign

Introducing. RUAG Space. From our Electronics portfolio: Antenna. From our Spacecraft portfolio: Thermal Insulation

Magnetospheric MultiScale Mission. SpaceWire Implementation

Analysis of Aircraft Separations and Collision Risk Modeling

Missions, Operations & Ground Infrastructure

Dräger PSS Merlin Modem System

Spacecraft Avionics. Lecture #26 December 2, 2014 Avionics overview Shuttle systems Constellation systems MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F

ONE PLATFORM, MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS: SURVEYING CONSTRUCTION FORESTRY AGRICULTURE ENVIRONMENT POWER ENGINEERING BIRDIE YOUR TAILOR-MADE UAV

FLIGHT OPERATIONS INTRODUCTION ICAO Air Navigation Commission

EA-12 Coupled Harmonic Oscillators

Application for a Special Flight Operations Certificate

Planned Orbital Flight Test of a 6m HIAD

July VA 219. ATV Georges Lemaître

FAA Satellite. Navigation Update. Federal Aviation Administration. May 2014

RUAT Junior Glider Design Competition Version 1.5

LAUNCH KIT. November 2017 VV11. MOHAMMED VI A satellite

H-II TRANSFER VEHICLE TRAJECTORY PLANNING AND FLIGHT OPERATION RESULTS

Global Avionics Training Specialists, LLC

Overview. Eero Ailio European Commission

NextGen and GA 2014 Welcome Outline Safety Seminars Safety Seminars

PHY 133 Lab 6 - Conservation of Momentum

MASER SOUNDING ROCKET MICROGRAVITY FLIGHTS

Aircraft Systems and 4D Trajectory Management

Module N B0-102: Baseline Ground-based Safety Nets

PBN Airspace Design Workshop. Area Navigation. Asia and Pacific Regional Sub-Office Beijing, China. 5 May 2016 Page 1 APAC RSO BEIJING

VORCORE/STRATEOLE. VORCORE / STRATEOLE Workshop. September 16-17, Paris VORCORE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION VORCORE IMPLEMENTATION 1/10/02

Electronic visibility via ADS-B for small aircraft. John Korna, NATS

Flight Evaluation Schedule For GPS IFR Approval Primary Means Enroute, Terminal and Non-Precision Approach

Airborne Remote Sensing Component of Marine Debris Monitoring

LAUNCH KIT. September 2018 VA243. Horizons 3e. Azerspace-2/Intelsat 38

Successful Return to Flight of the H-IIA Launch Vehicle

LAUNCHING YOUR UNMANNED AIRCRAFT PROGRAM

Surveillance and Broadcast Services

LAUNCH KIT AUGUST 2018 VV12 AEOLUS

Flight inspection and validation

small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Arlington Police Department June 28, 2011

Historical background

Flight inspection service of LGS Radionavigation Aids in 2017

Integrated Flight Instrument Systems

Preliminary Results from the ATHENA-OAWL Venture Tech Airborne Mission

Space Based ADS-B. ICAO SAT meeting - June 2016 AIREON LLC PROPRIETARY INFORMATION

Surveillance and Broadcast Services

NAVISAT Middle East & Africa

Using PBN for Terminal and Extended Terminal Operations

VOLUME 4 AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONAL AUTHORIZATION CHAPTER 1 AIR NAVIGATION, COMMUNICATIONS, AND SURVEILLANCE. Section 4 Class II Navigation

Advanced Flight Control System Failure States Airworthiness Requirements and Verification

SUMMARY. of the North. Reference: A B

Arianespace 2013 Organization, History and Programs

GBAS implementation status: international context and situation in France

Satcom for ATM. Iris workshop ESTEC, 18th September 2007

Addendum: UAV Avionics

Industria, Innovazione e Ricerca: Le nuove frontiere del volo a pilotaggio remoto

LAUNCH KIT. December 2017 VA240. Galileo FOC-M7 SAT

TRUMPF TRUMATIC L 3050

Garrecht TRX 1500 Traffic-Sensor

SAVOIR industrial perspectives Thales Alenia Space View

SBAS Frequently Asked Questions

Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Principal Investigator One Year Update Workshop

TTC NEWS January 2006

Integrated Optimization of Arrival, Departure, and Surface Operations

New measurements techniques

December VA 221 DIRECTV-14 GSAT-16

LAUNCH KIT. December 2018 VA246 GSAT-11 GEO-KOMPSAT-2A

P310 VTOL UAV Operation Manual

Safety in prototype flight

ADS-B via Low Earth Orbiting Satellites Benefits Assessment

April 16, Erik Larson

Definitions. U-SAFE : UAS Secure Autonomous Flight Environment. UTM: UAS Traffic Management

Pat Reines Avionics Support for GBAS and Performance Based Navigation (PBN)

Air4All Frequency Group Study on military spectrum allocations required for the Insertion into the GAT of the UAS

List of Bachelor and Master Courses at the Faculty of Aerospace Engineering

ESA-EDA: Paving the Way for New UAS Capabilities in Europe

SUPPLEMENT A33 TO THE AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL DA 40 NG. Integrated Avionics System Garmin G1000,

Garmin GNS 430W. Advanced Technology Offering Enhanced Situational Awareness and Safety

rescue parachute MINIPLANE SNIP

Estimating Sources of Temporal Deviations from Flight Plans

Hereafter there are some examples on how parts of a test campaign should typically be classified. In case of any doubt contact the Agency:

Terms of Reference for a rulemaking task. Portable Electronic Devices (PEDs)

MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

Ground Deformation Monitoring at Natural Gas Production Sites using Interferometric SAR

Validation Results of Airport Total Operations Planner Prototype CLOU. FAA/EUROCONTROL ATM Seminar 2007 Andreas Pick, DLR

ESA Telecom Startup Projects ITT AO-5114 SATWAYS 6/023. Final review

SBAS-ASECNA Programme Status

Evaluation of Pushback Decision-Support Tool Concept for Charlotte Douglas International Airport Ramp Operations

Global Avionics Training Specialists, LLC

September VA 226. Sky Muster ARSAT-2

Hiway Gateway Specification and Technical Data

Human Factors of Remotely Piloted Aircraft. Alan Hobbs San Jose State University/NASA Ames Research Center

NASA s Role in Integration of UAVs

Analyzing Risk at the FAA Flight Systems Laboratory

Analysis of ATM Performance during Equipment Outages

A SEGMENTED ARCHITECTURE APPROACH TO PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS, LONG-TERM, ADAPTIVE AND COST- EFFECTIVE GLACIERS MONITORING SYSTEM

RNP OPERATIONS. We will now explain the key concepts that should not be mixed up and that are commonly not precisely understood.

Product Specification

Septentrio EGNOS An overview

Garmin GNC 420 GPS Navigator with VHF COM

SUPPLEMENT A33 TO THE AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL DA 62. Integrated Avionics System Garmin G1000 and. G1000 NXi, SBAS and P-RNAV Operation

Transcription:

ACES Atomic Clock Ensemble in Space Mission Status and Recent Test Results L.Cacciapuoti (ESA) Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 1

ACES Mission Concept ACES payload ISS HTV on-orbit transportation TM/TC ELT signal MWL signal HII-B launcher SLR stations MWL GTs network ISS NASA CC ACES USOC Columbus CC Ground clocks Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 2

The Columbus Module Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 3

PHARAO (CNES): Atomic clock based on laser cooled Cs atoms SHM (ESA): Active hydrogen maser FCDP (ESA): Clocks comparison and distribution MWL (ESA): T&F transfer link GNSS receiver (ESA) Support subsystems (ESA) XPLC: External PL computer PDU: Power distribution unit, Mechanical, thermal subsystems CEPA: Columbus External PL Adapter (ESA-NASA) European Laser Timing (ELT) optical link (ESA) The ACES Payload XPLC GNSS antenna SHM PHARAO Volume: 1172x867x1246 mm 3 Mass: 227 kg Power: 450 W ASTRIUM Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 4 PDU FCDP PHARAO UGB MWL antennas GNSS Receiver MWL

PHARAO: A Cold-Atom Clock in µ-gravity PHARAO EM Total volume: 990x336x444 mm3 Mass: 44 kg Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 5

PHARAO EM Ramsey Interrogation S/N: ~10 1.0 3 Launch speed: 3.56 m/s Interaction time (T): ~100 ms ν 0.8 Ramsey =1/2T: ~5.6 Hz ν Rabi =2/(t 1 +t 2 ): ~170 Hz 0.6 0.4 0.2 Transition probability 0.0-300 -200-100 0 100 200 300 Frequency (Hz) Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 6

PHARAO EM Frequency Instability Internal mode: 3 10-13 @ 1s, limited by the USO and the short interrogation time achievable on ground. Measurements compatible with 7 10-14 τ 1/2 frequency instability in space. Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 7

SHM: An Active H-maser for Space SHM role in ACES ACES flywheel oscillator Coherent detection ACT injection Cavity varactor PID PHARAO characterization Technical challenges Low mass, volume, and power consumption Full performances: 1.5 10-13 @ 1 s 1.5 10-15 @ 10 4 s Design solution Full size Al cavity Volume: 390x390x590 mm 3 Mass: 42 kg Automatic Cavity Tuning System (ACT) Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 8

SHM EM Assembly Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 9

SHM Preliminary Measurements C-field: 600 µg Pulling Factor: 4.39 10-5 Hz/Hz Atomic Quality Factor: 1.0 10 9 Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 10

The ACES Clock Signal Stability of the ACES clock signal: - 3 10-15 at 300 s (ISS pass) - 3 10-16 at 1 day - 1 10-16 at 10 days Accuracy: ~1 10-16 Short-term servo-loop PLL stabilizing the PHARAO local oscillator on the SHM clock signal FCDP processes the phase comparison signal and operates the servo-loop Long-term servo-loop FLL correcting SHM clock signal against long-term drifts Frequency discriminator signal provided by Cs resonator and processed by XPLC Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 11

FCDP EM some test results ASTRIUM Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 12

ACES Microwave Link Two-way link: Removal of the troposphere time delay (8.3-103 ns) Removal of 1st order Doppler effect Removal of instrumental delays and common mode effects Additional down-link in the S-band: Determination of the ionosphere TEC Correction of the ionosphere time delay (0.3-40 ns in S-band, 6-810 ps in Ku-band) Phase PN code modulation: Removal of 2π phase ambiguity High chip rate (100 MChip/s) on the code: Higher resolution Multipath suppression ASTRIUM Les Houches, 20 October 2009 Carrier and code phase measurements (1 per second) Data link: 2 kbits/s on the S-band down-link to obtain clock comparison results in real time Up to 4 simultaneous space-to-ground clock comparisons GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 13

ACES MWL Performances 100 PHARAO SHM MWL 10 σ x (τ) [ps] 1 0,1 10-1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 τ [s] Time stability: 0.24 ps at 300 s, 5 ps at 1 day, 20 ps at 10 days of integration time Accuracy: absolute calibration at the 100 ps level Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 14

MWL EM performances Carrier-phase stability Code-phase stability Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 15

MWL Ground Terminal Electronics similar to MWL FS EU MWL GT EU attached to the steering unit to reduce phase instabilities due to tracking motion A computer controls the steering unit based on ISS orbit prediction files, collects telemetry and science data both from the local clock and the MWL GT electronics Interfaced to the ACES Users Support and Operation Center (USOC) for data exchange System protected by a radome cupola Thermal control, MWL GT computer, Ground power clocks supply, synchronized and UPS to housed UTC to 0.5 in µs a (100 separated ps @ 10d support for at least rack. two ground clocks) Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 16

ACES EM System-level Tests Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 17

ACES Clocks Compatibility Tests PHARAO Allan Deviation with SHM ON in evaluation mode: servo-loop on the 9.192 GHz closed Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 18

ACES Clocks Compatibility Tests PHARAO Allan Deviation with SHM ON in autonomous mode: servo-loop on the 100 MHz closed Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 19

Next Steps Characterization of the short-term servo-loop ( ongoing) Characterization of the long-term servo-loop Long duration measurement: Long term stability Absolute frequency measurement with respect to the SYRTE mobile fountain clock FOM Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 20

ACES Operational Scenario Mission duration: 1.5 years up to 3 years ISS orbit parameters: Altitude: ~ 400 km NIST USNO LNE UWA Tokyo Inclination: ~ 51.6 Period: 90 min MWL ground terminals Located at ground clock sites Distributed worldwide: ~35 institutes interested in clock comparisons with ACES Clock comparisons via MWL and ELT Space-to-ground Link durations up to 400 seconds At least one useful ISS pass per day Ground-to-ground Common view Non-common view Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 21 PTB ISS

Ground Clock Comparisons via ACES MWL Space-based methods (~1000 km baseline): GPS (CP), TWSTFT, T2L2 on ground (~100 km baseline): Fibre-based links Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 22

ACES Mission Objectives ACES Mission Objectives ACES performances Fundamental physics tests Scientific background and recent results Measurement of the gravitational red shift Absolute measurement of the gravitational redshift at an uncertainty level < 50 10-6 after 300 s and < 2 10-6 after 10 days of integration time. Space-to-ground clock comparison at the 10-16 level, will yield a factor 35 improvement on previous measurements (GPA experiment). Search for time drifts of fundamental constants Time variations of the fine structure constant α at a precision level of α -1 dα / dt < 1 10-17 year -1 down to 3 10-18 year -1 in case of a mission duration of 3 years Optical clocks progress will allow clock-to-clock comparisons below the 10-17 level. Crossed comparisons of clocks based on different atomic elements will impose strong constraints on the time drifts of α, me /Λ QCD, and m u /Λ QCD. Search for violations of special relativity Search for anisotropies of the speed of light at the level δ c / c < 10-10. ACES results will improve present limits on the RMS parameter α based on fast ions spectroscopy and GPS satellites by one and two orders of magnitudes respectively. Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 23

Relativistic Geodesy with ACES U 1 U 2 Relativistic geodesy: mapping of the Earth gravitational potential based on the precision measurement of the red-shift experienced by two clocks at two different locations ACES will perform intercontinental comparisons of optical clocks at the 10-17 level after 1 week of integration time, measuring the local height of the geoid at the 10 cm level. The global coverage offered by ACES will complement the results of the CHAMP, GRACE, and GOCE missions. Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 24

ELT Scientific Objectives Clock Comparisons and Time Transfer Space-to-ground comparisons of clocks reaching a TDEV of 4 ps between 300 s and 10 4 s of integration time, better than 7 ps on the long-term CV comparisons below 6 ps per ISS pass Non-CV comparisons below 6 ps after 2000 s of dead time Space-to-ground and ground-to-ground synchronization of clocks Laser Ranging Laser ranging performance at the centimetre level per single shot (50 ps one-way) Comparison of ranging techniques: one-way optical ranging, twoway optical ranging, microwave ranging Analysis of atmosphere propagation delays Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 25

and GNSS Applications ACES and the GNSS network Orbit determination as operational function and support applications in the areas of: GNSS time and frequency transfer Radio-occultation experiments Coherent reflectometry experiments Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 26

ACES Mission Milestones Closure of EM phase by end 2009 with the completion of ACES EM system level tests ACES PL CDR ACES Ground Segment PDR Start of FM phase in beginning 2010 Selection process of MWL Ground Terminal locations during 2010 MWL Ground Terminals deployment in 2012 Delivery of clocks FMs 2012 Ground segment operation readiness 2012 ACES ready for launch in 2013 Les Houches, 20 October 2009 GPhyS Kick-Off Colloquium 27