AIRBUS FLY-BY-WIRE A TOTAL APPROACH TO DEPENDABILITY

Similar documents
AIRBUS FLY-BY-WIRE A TOTAL APPROACH TO DEPENDABILITY

Multi/many core in Avionics Systems

The organisation of the Airbus. A330/340 flight control system. Ian Sommerville 2001 Airbus flight control system Slide 1

del Airbus en el mundo de la

Flight control checks Flight Control Events

Lithium Battery as Cargo

Go-Around Procedure. Flight Instructor Seminar / Miami, May 24 th and 25 th, 2011

Available On-Board Technologies For Runway Excursions Prevention

MRO Trends: Airbus update

NAVBLUE: Reach for the skies

Technical Press Briefing

Stall. Review of the Fundamentals, the Procedure and the Training. Presented by Capt. Christian Norden/ Flight Crew Development

Airbus A320family FOPP Air Flow Deflector

AP/FD TCAS and TCAP. Airborne Conflict Safety Forum Harry Nelson. A reminder and update. Month 20XX

Think the solution, experience the change

Inadvertent Slide Deployments Update

Succeeding with Entry into Service MRO Europe: Engineering & Maintenance

Designing for ease of future maintenance

June 9th, 2011 Runway Excursions at Landing The n 1 Global Air Safety Issue Can We Reduce this Risk Through Innovative Avionics?

Applicability / Compatibility of STPA with FAA Regulations & Guidance. First STAMP/STPA Workshop. Federal Aviation Administration

International Conference on Integrated Modular Avionics Moscow

AIRBUS VIEW ON STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS TO COMPOSITE COMPONNENT

Glass Cockpits in General Aviation Aircraft. Consequences for training and simulators. Fred Abbink

OLM FBW 2006 Toulouse September Head Up Display

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...

UNIQUE DEPENDABILITY ISSUES FOR COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE FLY BY WIRE SYSTEMS

ATSAW. (Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness) Presented by Laurent VIDAL - Surveillance systems manager Support to sales & programs

User Terminal certification process considerations

Maintenance Cost Estimation Method of an Aircraft Manufacturer

Fuel and Flight Efficiency Services by Airbus

Towards the Future ATM

Introduction to ROPS. Runway Overrun Prevention System. Presented by: Jerome JOURNADE ROPS Technical Manager

New generation aircraft in the instrument approach domain. Jean-Christophe Lair Airbus Test pilot 1 st Feb. 2017

ITA Europe 2015 Keynote Speaker

FLIGHT SAFETY Technology and the Human Factor. A pilot s perspective by Prof. dr ir J.A. Mulder Delft University of Technology

Colombian PBN implementation: El Dorado case study

Airport Compatibility

Operational Interruption Cost Assessment Methodology

Air Transport Forecast & Scenarios Key drivers for Scenario building. EFONET Workshop The Hague November 21st 2008

Transformation in Procurement. Challenges for the Global Aircraft Industry. HAL Executives Presentation Toulouse, October 13, 2014

Avionics Certification. Dhruv Mittal

AIRBUS Generic Flight Test Installation

I AO Chi h e i f E c E on o o n m o i m c i A na n ly l s y is i & P o P l o ilc i y y Se S ctio i n

Beijing, 18 h of September 2014 Pierre BACHELIER Head of ATM Programme. Cockpit Initiatives. ATC Global 2014

Athens International Airport, Marketing Workshop. The Challenges facing Air Transport. John Blanchfield Director, Technical Marketing, Airbus

Appendices. Introduction to Appendices

Services by Airbus Training. A350XWB Reaching new horizons together

Excerpts from ICAO PBCS Manual

FLIGHT CREW TRAINING SOLUTIONS

Safety Enhancement SE ASA Design Virtual Day-VMC Displays

Runway Excursions at Landing The n 1 Source of Insurance Claims for Aviation Industry How Can We Reduce this Risk Through Innovative Avionics?

Embedded System Development for Distributed Networked Computing Platforms

A380: Designed for Airports

Federal Aviation. Administration Unmanned Aircraft Human Factors Research Program. Federal Aviation Administration

OPTIONS FOR INTERCONNECTION OF SAFETY ASSESSMENT METHODS AND RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE IN GENERAL AVIATION

Research on Fault Tolerant Controls within GARTEUR

Experience Feedback in the Air Transport

What did people think in 1970?

THE SOCIETY OF EXPERIMENTAL TEST PILOTS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

COVER SHEET. Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) Information Sheet Part 91 RVSM Letter of Authorization

ASSEMBLY 35TH SESSION PLENARY. Statements by delegations of Contracting States and of Observers INDONESIAN AIRWORTHINESS SYSTEMS

The role of Flight Data Analysis in the aircraft manufacturer s SMS.

Human Factors Considerations for Rotorcraft

AIRWORTHINESS ADVISORY. Airworthiness Impacts of Electronic Flight Bags

Human Factors of Remotely Piloted Aircraft. Alan Hobbs San Jose State University/NASA Ames Research Center

Africa, Airbus; A vision of the future

Identifying and Utilizing Precursors

An Automated Airspace Concept for the Next Generation Air Traffic Control System

Analyzing Risk at the FAA Flight Systems Laboratory

Certification of Rotorcraft and FHA Process

(DRAFT) AFI REDUCED VERTICAL SEPARATION MINIMUM (RVSM) RVSM SAFETY POLICY

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Development and Achievement of the T-50 Flight Control s Consolidated OFP. 1. Introduction. 2. Consolidated OFP s Needs

Spanair Flight JK5022

In-Flight Entertainment and Connectivity

REPORT 2014/111 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION. Audit of air operations in the United Nations Operation in Côte d Ivoire

Flight Operations Safety Awareness Seminar (FOSAS)

COVER SHEET. Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) Information Sheet Part 91 RVSM Letter of Authorization

Implementing UPRT in an airline

Advanced Flight Control System Failure States Airworthiness Requirements and Verification

Aero Design Battery Shop

Wireless Avionics Intra- Communications (WAIC) SAE Aerospace Standards Summit Spring 2017, 25-26th April, 2017, Cologne, Germany

Overview Net-Enabled Aircraft Design Current Project Status Join the Team! Kristin Yvonne Rozier University of Cincinnati

Advisory Circular (AC)

Aviation Training Catalogue

EclipsE 500 N884AM. IFMS Hours ESP GOLD

Global Civil Aviation & Military Simulation & Training Market( ) Trends & Opportunities

SPECIAL CONDITION. : RPAS Flight Control Systems

EXPLANATORY NOTE. CS-25 Amendment 5

Spacecraft Avionics. Lecture #26 December 2, 2014 Avionics overview Shuttle systems Constellation systems MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F

Federal Aviation Administration. Summary

Civil Aircraft System Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility

Safety in prototype flight

Critical Systems and Software Solutions

Aeronautics & Air Transport in FP7

Commercialization of Radio Frequency Identification within Aerospace and Defense Kenneth D. Porad

IDG damage due to low oil level operation

ATR FREIGHTER VERSIONS. AN EASY CONVERSION AVAILABLE SINCE 2002, TO EXTEND ATR s

Associate Professor Patrick Murray

Airports and Airlines Winter Operations Economic Policy Aspects. Narjess Teyssier Chief Economic Analysis & Policy Section

Aeronautics & Air Transport in FP7. DG RTD-H.3 - Aeronautics Brussels, January 2007

Transcription:

SAE Aerospace Control & Guidance Systems committee Presented by Pascal TRAVERSE And Isabelle Lacaze & Jean Souyris AIRBUS FLY-BY-WIRE A TOTAL APPROACH TO DEPENDABILITY Reference: by Pascal TRAVERSE, Isabelle LACAZE and Jean SOUYRIS, IFIP World Computer Conference, in Toulouse, August 2004. SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head

AIRBUS FLY-BY-WIRE A TOTAL APPROACH TO DEPENDABILITY Background What is «fly-by-wire» Dependability attributes Coverage of (some) dependability threats Physical faults Design & manufacturing errors Particular risks Human-Machine Interface Concluding words SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head October 2005 Page 2

AIRBUS FLY-BY-WIRE: BACKGROUND SAFETY AVAILABILITY SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head October 2005 Page 3

PHYSICAL FAULTS SAFETY COM MON COMMAND & MONITORING COMPUTER SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head October 2005 Page 4

PHYSICAL FAULTS AVAILABILITY P1 S1 S2 P2 REDUNDANCY ACTIVE / STAND-BY P1/Green Î P2/Blue Î S1/Green Î S2/Blue SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head October 2005 Page 5

DESIGN & MANUFACTURING ERROR Airbus Fly-by-Wire: system is developed to ARP 4754 level A Computers to DO178B & DO254 level A Fault avoidance (plus internal guidelines) Two types of dissimilar computers are used PRIM SEC Fault tolerance SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head P1 S1 October 2005 Page 6

DESIGN & MANUFACTURING ERROR FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION - interface between aircraft & computer sciences - automatic code generation - Classical V&V means, plus - virtual iron bird (simulation) - some formal proof SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head October 2005 Page 7

DESIGN & MANUFACTURING ERROR PROOF of PROGRAM Applied on A380 FbW software, on a limited basis credit for certification Method appraisal on-going on system functional specification SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head October 2005 Page 8

DESIGN & MANUFACTURING ERROR FAULT TOLERANCE P1 S1 S2 P2 - SEC simpler than PRIM - PRIM HW SEC HW - 4 different software - data diversity - From random dissimilarity to managed one - Comforted by experience SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head October 2005 Page 9

PARTICULAR RISKS COMMON POINT AVOIDANCE PRIM1-SEC1 2500 VU - Qualification to environment - Physical separation - Ultimate back-up PRIM3-SEC3- CPIOMC1 2100 VU PRIM2-SEC2- CPIOMC2 2200 VU SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head October 2005 Page 10

PARTICULAR RISKS ULTIMATE BACK-UP - Continued safe flight while crew restore computers - Expected to be Extremely Improbable - No credit for certification - From mechanical (A320) to electrical (A380 & A400M) 3000psi SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head October 2005 Page 11 r 28VDC

ELECTRICAL ACTUATION A320... A340 ELECTRICAL GENERATION HYDRAULIC GENERATION EMER GEN GEN 1 GEN 2 APU GEN GREEN PUMP YELLOW PUMP BLUE PUMP Avionics Flight Controls Actuators A380 A400M ELECTRICAL GENERATION HYDRAULIC GENERATION EMER GEN GEN 1 GEN 2 APU GEN GREEN PUMP YELLOW PUMP Avionics Flight Controls Actuators MORE REDUNDANCY DISSIMILAR (HYDRAULIC / ELECTRICAL) INCREASED SEGREGATION SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head October 2005 Page 12

HUMAN-MACHINE INTERFACE - Reduction of crew workload & fatigue - Situation awareness - System reconfiguration - Flight envelope protections -TCAS, TAWS - Airbus protections Let the crew concentrate on trajectory Stick released : Aircraft will fly inside normal Flight Envelope Normal Peripheral Stick on the stops : Aircraft will fly at the maximum safe limit SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head October 2005 Page 13

DEPENDABILITY PROCESS Safety & Reliability method and process - Research, - Standards, - Processes, - Methods, - Guidelines, - Tools, - In service follow up - S/R Rules and recom. - Regulation Cost requirements s y s t e m l i s t Multi program, multi disciplinary activities Top Level Top Level TOP (AIRCRAFT) Program Product Requirements Requirements Top level requirements document Previous A/C design and In service experience A/C constraints A/C Functions List (COMPONENT) Function /Systems allocation matrix Aircraft functions list requirements DOWN PROCESS allocation Multi system activities on one program 3- System S/R Requirements document SRD Airworthiness regulation, MMEL 1- S/R Common Data Document 2- Aircraft FHA (Functional Hazard Analysis 4- System function list and System FHA 5- : Prelim. system Safety Assessment FIA: Function Implantation Analysis IHA/ECHA: Intrinsic/Environment hazard Analysis 6- Equipment S/R Requirements 8- COMMON CAUSE ANALYSIS (CCA): - PRA (Particular Risk Analysis) - ZSA (Zonal Safety Analysis) - CMA (Common Mode Analysis) - HHA (Human Hazard Analysis 7- Equipment level Safety/Reliability studies (FMEA/FMES, etc.) SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head October 2005 Page 14 PTS PTS PTS A/C Requirements/CRI, Significant Items, Aircraft S/R Reviews System/equipment activities on one program Aircraft 11-Airworthiness 12-Lessons manufacturer BOTTOM - UP directives monitoring learned evaluation System S/R Reviews Common Cause activities on one program Aircraft in service Aircraft certification 10- Aircraft Safety/ Reliability Synthesis 9b- System Safety Assessment and MMEL safety justification 9a- first flight, Interface S/R Activities Multi disciplinary activities

DEPENDABILITY PROCESS Cost requirements Top Level Program Requirements Top Level Product Requirements Previous A/C design and In service experience Airworthiness regulation, MMEL Aircraft manufacturer directives 11-Airworthiness monitoring 12-Lessons learned Aircraft in service Safety & Reliability method and process - Research, - Standards, - Processes, - Methods, - Guidelines, - Tools, - In service follow up - S/R Rules and recom. - Regulation s y s t e m l i s t Multi program, multi disciplinary activities Function /Systems allocation matrix A/C constraints Aircraft functions list Top level requirements document LESSONS LEARNED A/C Functions List Multi system activities on one program 3- System S/R Requirements document SRD 1- S/R Common Data Document 2- Aircraft FHA (Functional Hazard Analysis 4- System function list and System FHA 5- : Prelim. system Safety Assessment FIA: Function Implantation Analysis IHA/ECHA: Intrinsic/Environment hazard Analysis 6- Equipment S/R Requirements 8- COMMON CAUSE ANALYSIS (CCA): - PRA (Particular Risk Analysis) - ZSA (Zonal Safety Analysis) - CMA (Common Mode Analysis) - HHA (Human Hazard Analysis 7- Equipment level Safety/Reliability studies (FMEA/FMES, etc.) SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head October 2005 Page 15 PTS PTS PTS A/C Requirements/CRI, Significant Items, Aircraft S/R Reviews System/equipment activities on one program IN-SERVICE AIRCRAFT System S/R Reviews Common Cause activities on one program Aircraft certification 10- Aircraft Safety/ Reliability Synthesis 9b- System Safety Assessment and MMEL safety justification 9a- first flight, Interface S/R Activities Multi disciplinary activities

DEPENDABILITY PROCESS Safety & Reliability method and process Cost requirements Top Level Program Requirements Top Level Product Requirements Top level requirements document Previous A/C design and In service experience - Research, A/C constraints A/C Functions List - Standards, - Zonal Safety Analysis - Processes, - Methods, - Guidelines, - Tools, - In service follow up - S/R Rules and recom. - Regulation s y s t e m l i s t Aircraft functions list 3- System S/R Requirements document SRD Airworthiness regulation, MMEL COMMON CAUSE ANALYSIS: - Particular Risk Analysis - Common Function /Systems Mode Analysis allocation matrix - Human Hazard Analysis Multi program, multi disciplinary activities Multi system activities on one program 1- S/R Common Data Document 2- Aircraft FHA (Functional Hazard Analysis 4- System function list and System FHA Aircraft manufacturer directives 5- : Prelim. system Safety Assessment FIA: Function Implantation Analysis IHA/ECHA: Intrinsic/Environment hazard Analysis 6- Equipment S/R Requirements 8- COMMON CAUSE ANALYSIS (CCA): - PRA (Particular Risk Analysis) - ZSA (Zonal Safety Analysis) - CMA (Common Mode Analysis) - HHA (Human Hazard Analysis 7- Equipment level Safety/Reliability studies (FMEA/FMES, etc.) SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head October 2005 Page 16 PTS PTS PTS A/C Requirements/CRI, Significant Items, Aircraft S/R Reviews System/equipment activities on one program 11-Airworthiness monitoring System S/R Reviews Common Cause activities on one program 12-Lessons learned Aircraft in service Aircraft certification 10- Aircraft Safety/ Reliability Synthesis 9b- System Safety Assessment and MMEL safety justification 9a- first flight, Interface S/R Activities Multi disciplinary activities

AIRBUS FLY-BY-WIRE A TOTAL APPROACH TO DEPENDABILITY CONCLUDING WORDS Joint effort for improvement - FAA/JAA/ Airbus/Boeing/ - Regulations and practices improvement based on - Type certifications experience - In-service incidents & accidents - For in-service airplane & under design SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head October 2005 Page 17

This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of AIRBUS S.A.S. No intellectual property rights are granted by the delivery of this document and the disclosure of its content. This document shall not be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the express written consent of AIRBUS S.A.S. This document and its content shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied. The statements made herein do not constitute an offer. They are based on the mentioned assumptions and are expressed in good faith. Where the supporting grounds for these statements are not shown, AIRBUS S.A.S. will be pleased to explain the basis thereof. SAE/ACGS - Hilton Head October 2005 Page 18