Chapter 14. Design of Flexible Airport Pavements AC 150/5320-6D

Similar documents
Bearing Strength Assessment PLR & PCN

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

PCN Reporting- Current Problems and Future Research Plans

IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Related content PAPER OPEN ACCESS

Taxiway Pavement Evaluation to Support the Operational of Terminal 2 Juanda Airport

Pavement Strength Analysis Prepared by Molzen Corbin September 2016

COMFAA. Acknowledgments. Demonstration and. Rapol, FAA. Ken DeBord and Mike Roginski, Boeing Commercial Airplane Co. Federal Aviation Administration

Tires Versus Pavement: Pilots, mechanics, and airport managers on the same page

Airport Compatibility Brochure 737 MAX. March 2014 PRELIMINARY

Airport Compatibility Brochure 737 MAX

Flexible Pavement Design

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

Boeing Aircraft and the Impact on Airports

CHAPTER 5 - FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

Airport Compatibility

CESSNA SECTION 5 PERFORMANCE

Conference JERI Agressivité du trafic pour les chaussées, les atterrisseurs d avions. FABRE CYRIL, Head of Airfield Pavement November 2017

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

FAARFIELD Updates to FAA Advisory Circular 150/ Federal Aviation Administration. 1 December 2016

TAKEOFF SAFETY ISSUE 2-11/2001. Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance

FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION (FDR)

The offers operators increased capacity while taking advantage of existing airport infrastructure. aero quarterly qtr_03 10

Regional Jets ,360 A319/ , , , ,780

FOR. Boeing Commercial Airplanes

2.1 General Characteristics. 2.2 General Dimensions. 2.3 Ground Clearances. 2.4 Interior Arrangements. 2.5 Cabin Cross Sections

Airport Design-3 Geometric Design

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

Manufacturer s Perspective- Airport Pavement Needs and Maintenance Issues

CEE 5614 and CEE Aircraft Classifications. Spring 2013

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

3.1 CRITICAL AIRCRAFT

Assignment 7: Airport Geometric Design Standards

The purpose of this Demand/Capacity. The airfield configuration for SPG. Methods for determining airport AIRPORT DEMAND CAPACITY. Runway Configuration

767 Airplane Characteristics for. Airport Planning. Boeing Commercial Airplanes. D SEPTEMBER 2005 i

The Aircraft Classification Rating Pavement Classification Rating ACR-PCR

Wellington International Airport Runway Overlay

Worldwide, the likelihood

CATCODE ] CATCODE

/300 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning

Valley Fliers 1402 Auburn Way North, #223 Auburn WA 98002

Assignment 3: Runway Length and EMAS Design. Aircraft Engine Remarks. CFM56-7B20/-7B22/-7B24 developing 20,000 lb of thrust at sea level

AIRSIDE CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

Chapter 5 Facility Requirements

Pavement LCA Where Do We Go from Here!!

Apron. FAC: 1131 CATCODE: OPR: AFCEC/COS OCR: AF/A3O-A 1.1. Description. Aprons are paved areas provided for aircraft parking, servicing, and

Session Best Practices Amendments From Annex14, Volume I Annex 15. Runway Incursions Runway Excursions

Chapter 5 Facility Requirements

Hartford-Brainard Airport Potential Runway Closure White Paper

Advisory Circular (AC)

4. Demand/Capacity Assessment and Facility Requirements

APPENDIX X: RUNWAY LENGTH ANALYSIS

HEATHROW NIGHT MOVEMENT AND QUOTA ALLOCATION PROCEDURES Version 3

CHAPTER 4 DEMAND/CAPACITY ANALYSIS

Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc

NOTES ON COST AND COST ESTIMATION by D. Gillen

AIRPORT PAVEMENT DESIGNS Consideration of New Guidelines

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

International Industry Working Group Fifth Edition R1, 2007

Aerodrome Design Manual

NOTE: DATA PRELIMINARY

Boeing Airplane Overview

/300 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning

Facility Requirements

Budapest, Hungary 2015

Demonstration and. 4. Contact List. Federal Aviation Administration. Administration

China Aeromodelling Design Challenge. Contest Rules China Aeromodelling Design Challenge Page 1 of 14

3.1 General Information. 3.2 Payload/Range for 0.85 Mach Cruise. 3.3 F.A.R. Takeoff Runway Length Requirements

P.001.FPG FUEL PLANNING GUIDE. First Edition

CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED ACTION

Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update

D.1 Introduction. Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport

MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT. Civil Environmental Engineering Division

Airplane Performance. Introduction. Copyright 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Transportation Engineering -II Dr. Rajat Rastogi Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology - Roorkee

Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Spring 2015 Blacksburg, Virginia

DEVELOPMENT OF TOE MIDFIELD TERMINAL IROJECT CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT REPORT DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION TOM FOERSTER CHAIRMAN BARBARA HAFER COMMISSIONER

737 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning

Aircraft Classifications. Dr. Antonio Trani and Julio Roa Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

TECHNICAL PAPER

Airport Compatibility

AIRFIELD CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

3.1 General Information. 3.2 Payload/Range. 3.3 F.A.R. Takeoff Runway Length Requirements. 3.4 F.A.R. Landing Runway Length Requirements

Chapter 5 Center of Gravity Change After Repair or Alteration

777-9 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning

RSAT RUNUP ANALYSIS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. METHODOLOGY

Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. January 27, 2009 Blacksburg, Virginia

PUBLIC NOTICE. Table 1 Projects Proposed by Amendment

Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016

REPORT. Pavement Evaluation Summary Brookshire Way & Duluth Park Gwinnett County Duluth, Georgia. Project Number

USE OF TAKEOFF CHARTS [B737]

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

Draft Proposal for the Amendment of the Sub-Cap on Off-Peak Landing & Take Off Charges at Dublin Airport. Addendum to Commission Paper CP4/2003

Wing Taper Ratio. Wing Incidence. Wing Incidence

MASTER PLAN UPDATE WORKING PAPER NO. 3. Demand/Capacity Analysis and Facility Requirements. March 18, 2013

Transcription:

Chapter 14 Design of Flexible Airport Pavements AC 150/5320-6D

AIRCRAFT CONSIDERATIONS. a. Load. maximum anticipated takeoff weight of the aircraft. The design procedure assumes 95 percent of the gross weight is carried by the main landing gears and 5 percent is carried by the nose gear. b. Landing Gear Type and Geometry. (1)Single Gear Aircraft. (2) Dual Gear Aircraft. (3) Dual Tandem Gear Aircraft. (4) Wide Body Aircraft. C. Tire Pressure. Tire pressure varies between 75 and 200 PSI (516 to 1 380 kpa) depending on gear configuration and gross weight. d. Traffic Volume. Forecasts of annual departures by aircraft type are needed for pavement design. Information on aircraft operations is available from Airport Master Plans, Terminal Area Forecasts,

DETERMINATION OF DESIGN AIRCRAFT. The forecast of annual departures by aircraft type will result in a list of a number of different aircraft. The design aircraft should be selected on the basis of the one requiring the greatest pavement thickness. Each aircraft type in the forecast should be checked to determine the pavement thickness required by using the appropriate design curve with the forecast number of annual departures for that aircraft. The aircraft type which produces the greatest pavement thickness is the design aircraft. The design aircraft is not necessarily the heaviest aircraft in the forecast.

DETERMINATION OF EQUIVALENT ANNUAL DEPARTURES BY THE DESIGN AIRCRAFT. a. Conversions. Since the traffic forecast is a mixture of a variety of aircraft having different landing gear types and different weights, the effects of all traffic must be accounted for in terms of the design aircraft. First, all aircraft must be converted to the same landing gear type as the design aircraft.

Secondly, after the aircraft have been grouped into the same landing gear configuration, the conversion to equivalent annual departures of the design aircraft should be determined by the following formula:

For this computation 95 percent of the gross weight of the aircraft is assumed to be carried by the main landing gears. Wide body aircraft require special attention in this calculation. Since wide body aircraft have significantly different landing gear assembly spacings more than other aircraft, special considerations are needed to maintain the relative effects. This is done by treating each wide body as a 300,000-pound (136 100 kg) dual tandem aircraft when computing equivalent annual departures. This should be done in every instance even when the design aircraft is a wide body. After the equivalent annual departures are determined, the design should proceed using the appropriate design curve for the design aircraft. For example if a wide body is the design aircraft, all equivalent departures should be calculated as described above; then the design curve for the wide body should be used with the calculated equivalent annual departures.

Example

TYPICAL SECTIONS. Airport pavements are generally constructed in uniform, full width sections. Runways may be constructed with a transversely variable section, if practical. A variable section permits a reduction in the quantity of materials required for the upper paving layers of the runway. However, more complex construction operations are associated with variable sections and are usually more costly. pavement thickness of 0.9T will be specified where traffic will be arrivals such as high speed turnoffs; and pavement thickness of 0.7T will be specified where pavement is required but traffic is unlikely such as along the extreme outer edges of the runway. Note that the full-strength keel section is 50 feet (15 m) on the basis of the research study discussed in paragraph 306a.

BASE COURSE. types of base courses for use on airports for aircraft design loads of 30,000 pounds (14 000 kg) or more are as follows: (1) Item P-208 - Aggregate Base Course (2) Item P-209 - Crushed Aggregate Base Course (3) Item P-21 1 - Lime Rock Base Course (4) Item P-304 - Cement Treated Base Course (5) Item P-306 - Econocrete Subbase Course (6) Item P-401 - Plant Mix Bituminous Pavements The use of Item P-208, Aggregate Base Course, as base course is limited to pavements designed for gross loads of 60,000 Ibs. (27 000 kg) or less When Item P-208 is used as base course the thickness of the hot mix asphalt surfacing should be increased 1 inch (25 mm) over that shown on the design curves.