AAPA CRUISE SEMINAR CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY Jim Rowe, AIA Bermello Ajamil & Partners APRIL 25, 2013

Similar documents
MAXIMIZING INVESTMENT AND UTILIZATION

CRUISE TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT THE TRUE STORY

Staff Report. Re: National Park Service Ferry Landing Facilities at Piers 31, 31½ and 33 Joint Meeting with BCDC Design Review Board

Tampa International Airport Master Plan Update. December 12, 2012

2 SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA

Preparing for Larger Cruise Vessels. Gary Ledford AAPA Facilities Engineering Seminar November 17, 2009

JUNEAU RUNWAY INCURSION MITIGATION (RIM) PROGRAM. April 10 th 2017

Airport Planning and Terminal Design

12 th Facilitation Division

Norfolk International Airport

Port Everglades Master/Vision Plan Update

SPADE-2 - Supporting Platform for Airport Decision-making and Efficiency Analysis Phase 2

SAN JOSÉ INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

Airport Systems: Planning, Design, and Management

EXHIBIT K TERMINAL PROJECT PROCEDURES PHASE I - DEVELOPMENT OF TERMINAL PROGRAM & ALTERNATIVES

FACILITATION (FAL) DIVISION TWELFTH SESSION. Cairo, Egypt, 22 March to 2 April 2004

Aviation ICT Forum 2014

Committee. Presentation Outline

Modeling Checked Baggage Requirements for Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Eric Miller

Appendix D. FIS Facility Siting Alternatives

Meeting Minutes. Meeting Details: FAC:

Considerations for Facility Consolidation

Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport

Security Queue Management Plan

AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Orlando International Airport One Jeff Fuqua Boulevard Orlando, Florida Memorandum TO: FROM:

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

Opportunities in Non-Container Trade and the Expanding Cruise Industry

Analysis of ATM Performance during Equipment Outages

PUBLIC SPACE HOTEL FUNCTIONS

COMMONWEALTH OF THE BAHAMAS MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS & TRANSPORT NASSAU HARBOUR PORT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. Nassau Harbour Port Improvement Project

JUNEAU RUNWAY INCURSION MITIGATION (RIM) PROGRAM JANUARY 25, 2017

FUTURE PASSENGER PROCESSING. ACRP New Concepts for Airport Terminal Landside Facilities

1.0 Project Background Mission Statement and Goals Objectives of this Sustainable Master Plan

( vs )

Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan Public Meeting March 16, 2015

Forecast and Overview

Note on validation of the baseline passenger terminal building model for the purpose of performing a capacity assessment of Dublin Airport

On a Typical Day in Fiscal Year 2008,

Traditional and Alternative Financing of Cruise Terminals

LAX Central Terminal Area Ground Transportation Improvement Plan

TABLE OF CONTENTS. General Study Objectives Public Involvement Issues to Be Resolved

FACILITATION PANEL (FALP)

Waterfront Plan Working Group Meeting Maritime & Water-Dependent Uses Meeting Agenda

FLL Master Plan Update BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BRIEFING

Airport Engineering Lectures

Quality Assurance. Introduction Need for quality assurance Answer to the need of quality assurance Details on quality assurance Conclusion A B C D E

Combined ASIOACG and INSPIRE Working Group Meeting, 2013 Dubai, UAE, 11 th to 14 th December 2013

Planning Advisory Committee November 20, 2014

TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

CruiseMaine Coalition Ports

5.7 Other Air Navigation Matters THE BAHAMAS FLIGHT INFORMATION REGION (FIR) (Presented by Bahamas EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

What is an Airport Master Plan?

International Civil Aviation Organization. Twenty-Fourth South East Asia ATM Coordination Group (SAIOACG/7) Bangkok, Thailand, March 2017

Appendix. Gatwick Airport Ltd - Further information on Gatwick s revised phasing strategy (including Programme) Gatwick Airport Limited

AFI Plan Aerodromes Certification Project Workshop for ESAF Region (Nairobi, Kenya, August 2016)

Overview. Bermello Ajamil & Partners (B&A) Ports & Maritime Division is among the premier groups working on waterfronts across the globe.

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

MASTER PLAN UPDATE. Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) FRESNO YOSEMITE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. Meeting #4

PELLSTON REGIONAL AIRPORT EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY PLAN

Financing Infrastructure: Working with your Users. Julie Garg Manager Airport & ATC Charges

2018 Airport Master Plan Overview of Development Concepts. Greg Ballentine (WSP)

UNIVERSITY PARK AIRPORT EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY PLAN

INCENTIVE PROGRAM

Analysis and Feasibility Broward County Convention Center Master Plan Study Fort Lauderdale, FL HKS I Urban Design Studio

Port of Seattle Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan An Economic Engine for Washington State. Kurt Beckett Deputy Chief Executive Officer

SUBJECT: Business Plan Update for Reid Hillview and San Martin Airports

AVIATION ENVIRONMENT CIRCULAR 2 OF 2013

Airport Master Plan for. Brown Field Municipal Airport PAC Meeting #3

Back kgrounder Cruise Tourism Global overview

CHAPTER 4: ALTERNATIVES

Irregular Operations (IROPS) Emergency Contingency Plan

Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan

R.P ADM-9-03 OT:RR:RD:BS H HLZ DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. Bureau of Customs and Border Protection.

PUBLIC INPUT MEETING Heart of Navarre Tourism Corridor September 27, 2016

Transportation Engineering -II Dr. Rajat Rastogi Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology - Roorkee

CRUISE SEMINAR April 24-26, 2013 San Francisco, CA

US and Seattle perspective on shore power for cruise ships

On-time departure rate up. Less congestion. RFID changes ferry travel.

Stakeholders Meeting

STUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

CANSO ATFM Data Exchange Network for the Americas (CADENA) (Presented by ALTA, CANSO, COCESNA and IATA)

Aviation Department Board Workshop. December 7, 2010

The Next International Cruise Tourism Hub

The passenger in focus of multimodal airport management

FORECASTING FUTURE ACTIVITY

Airport Master Plan. Rapid City Regional Airport. October 2015 FAA Submittal

AIRPORT PLANNING. Joseph K CHEONG. Lima, September 2018

Automated Border Control. AFI-SECFAL meeting 24 May 2017, Gaborone (Botswana)

Birmingham Airport 2033

2006 Port Everglades Master Plan Update Public Participation Program 2 nd Meeting December 6, 2006

An Overview of GMR Megawide Consortium s Unsolicited Proposal. March 2018

REGIONAL AIRPORTS. Learning from Experience - Planning Ahead

Thailand ATFM Operations at Sub- Regional Level

Airport Master Planning Process & Update

Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS

HIGH PERFORMING AIRPORTS CASE ZURICH AIRPORT. Geert Boosten ASDA CATO Delft 21 July 2015

Aerodrome Certification Applicable provisions

ICAO s Third Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS/3) Symposium Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China September 2018

1) Complete the Queuing Diagram by filling in the sequence of departing flights. The grey cells represent the departure slot (10 pts)

Transcription:

AAPA CRUISE SEMINAR CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY Jim Rowe, AIA Bermello Ajamil & Partners APRIL 25, 2013

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY AGENDA SF PIER 27 DESIGN PROCESS MIXED USE and PUBLIC ACCESS CBP GUIDELINE INTEGRATION with MIXED USE OPPORTUNITIES & PITFALLS PASSENGER CIRCULATION SIMULATION SF PIER 27 FINISHED PRODUCT ALMOST!

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY MASTER PLAN MIXED USE & PUBLIC ACCESS

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY MIXED USE FACILITY KEY FEATURES OPERABLE PERIMETER FENCING CONSOLIDATED CBP OFFICE FUNCTIONS OPEN DESIGN PLAN EASILY STERILIZED GLASS DOORS TO APRON & WATERFRONT HIGH CEILINGS / SPACE EASILY TRANSFORMED THROUGH ACCESS TO ENTRY LOBBY FOR EVENTS CONSERVATIVE REGULATORY SIGNAGE PLACEMENT

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY CBP Programming Considerations CTDS,Page2-1: Cruise ship passenger processing facilities in the U.S. may or may not be staffed by CBP staff. Staffing requirements at each facility are dictated by local operational and processing requirements. Staffing levels vary in the field per availableresources. Based upon input received from local stakeholders and users for preprogramminganalysis,cbpofficialswillevaluatetheport strafficprojections on a case-by-case basis. If the standards presented in the CTDS seem stringent, CBP may reduce selected requirements accordingly (i.e., for a smaller facility that would process a low volume of traffic arriving aboard a limitednumberofinternationalships).

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY CBP as a Design Team Member Port of Entry Designation and Project Approval Pre-Design and Programming Determine Peak Hour Operating Requirement Program Coordination CBP FO and Port Schematic Design Design Development Construction Document Construction Acceptance, Occupancy, and Commissioning Future Expansion PEAK HOUR OPS Design Vessel Load Gangway Quantity Simulation Findings and Case Building Reduced Space Sizes Reduced Construction Costs

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY PASSENGER CIRCULATION SIMULATION

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY PASSENGER CIRCULATION DESIGN CRITERIA 2010 Itinerary (43 calls) 41 calls: 2600 pax or less (11 calls: 1200 pax or less) 2 calls: up to 4080 pax

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY PERFORMANCE STANDARDS BASE DESIGN LOAD Operational cycle disembarkation 3.75 hours Operational cycle embarkation 5 hours SHIP Time in terminal (disembarkation) 90% under 30 minutes Time in terminal (embarkation) 90% under 15 minutes PASSENGERS Queuing -90% under 5 minutes (except embarkation)

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY PERFORMANCE STANDARDS CBP PROCESSING

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY INITIAL FINDINGS QUEUE VS. PROCESSING STAFF Vessel Debark Rate per Hour 4000pax/3.75hoursdebark=1066pax/hour=10Booths Average Passenger Processing Rate (80%pax@30sec/pax)+(20%pax@150sec/pax)=54sec/paxaverage Total Minimum Debarkation Time Required 4000paxx54sec/pax/10booths=6hours 10 Booths

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY PERFORMANCE STANDARDS PEAK DESIGN LOAD Operational cycle disembarkation 6 hours! Operational cycle embarkation 5 hours SHIP Time in terminal (disembarkation) 90% under 30 minutes Time in terminal (embarkation) 90% under 15 minutes PASSENGERS Queuing -90% under 5 minutes (except embarkation)

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY FINDINGS RATE OF PROCESSING RESULTANT QUEUE SIZE Base Design Load: 2600 passengers 1Gangways 3.75 hour debarkation cycle 700 pax/hour Peak Design Load: 4000 passengers 1Gangway 4.75 hour debarkation cycle(extended) 840 pax/hour Future Expansion Design Load: 4000 passengers 2Gangways 3.75 hour debarkation cycle 1100 pax/hour

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY SIMULATION

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY FINDINGS RATE OF PROCESSING RESULTANT SPACE SIZE

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY CBP Standards Deviation Protocol CTDS, Page 1-2: The Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, and the Assistant Commissioner, Office of Finance are jointly responsible for the implementation and administration of national policy for the CTDS. CBP Field Offices are responsible for applying the policies and procedures contained in the CTDS. Alternate or equivalent means, exceptions and deviations to the CTDS may be proposed to meet a specific requirement, as discussed in Section 1.1.3 below. 1.1.3 Alternate or Equivalent Means, Exceptions and Deviations In the event certain constraints or operational requirements require an alternate or equivalent means, exception or deviation to these standards for a particular cruise terminal project, a proposal shall be submitted to CBP for review and consideration. The proposal shall address many unique characteristics of cruise ship operations of the proposed project including: operational flow, space configurations, passenger facilitation, safety and security concerns. The proposal shall not compromise security, safety, and CBP operations. The Director, Field Operations (DFO) with concurrence from CBP Headquarters (HQ), will make final CBP approval determination regarding all requests for alternative or equivalent means, exceptions, and deviations to the CTDS.

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY CBP as a Design Team Member Port of Entry Designation and Project Approval Pre-Design and Programming Determine Peak Hour Operating Requirement Program Coordination CBP FO and Port Schematic Design Design Development Construction Document Construction Acceptance, Occupancy, and Commissioning Future Expansion PROGRAM COORDINATION Multi-Use Space Concepts Leveled Expectations Meticulous Record Keeping Defensible Space Design Technology Integration vs. Application Additional Revenue Potential

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY CBP Standards in a Mixed Use Facility

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY CBP Standards in a Mixed Use Facility

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY CBP Standards in a Mixed Use Facility

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY CBP Standards in a Mixed Use Facility

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY CBP Standards in a Mixed Use Facility

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY CBP Standards in a Mixed Use Facility

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY CBP Standards in a Mixed Use Facility

CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY FINISHED PRODUCT ALMOST!

AAPA CRUISE SEMINAR CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY Jim Rowe, AIA Bermello Ajamil & Partners APRIL 25, 2013