ATRS Global Airport Benchmarking Report 2003

Similar documents
ATRS Global Airport Performance Benchmarking Report, 2003

Privatization, Commercialization, Ownership Forms and their Effects on Airport Performance

Key Results of the ATRS Global Airport Benchmarking

Key Results of the ATRS Global Airport Benchmarking

Prof. Tae H. Oum The Air Transport Research Society (ATRS)

Key Findings of 2011 ATRS Global Airport Performance Benchmarking project

ACI 2008 WORLDWIDE AIRPORT TRAFFIC STATISTICS

Key Findings. Chunyan Yu Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) ww.atrsworld.org

Key Findings of 2012 ATRS Global Airport Performance Benchmarking project

Rankings of Major U.S. Airports. Total Passengers 2016

Key Findings. Chunyan Yu Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) ww.atrsworld.org

Rankings of Major U.S. Airports. Total Passengers 2017

John Gulding Manager, Strategic Analysis and Benchmarking, FAA. Hartmut Koelman Senior Expert, Performance review Unit, EUROCONTROL

Airports Council International

TravelWise Travel wisely. Travel safely.

Supportable Capacity

FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS IN AVIATION BUSINESS & REGIONAL LANDSCAPE. February Altan Büyükyılmaz, Turkish Technic, Executive VP Commerce

Preliminary World Airport Traffic 2010 Passenger traffic up 6.3%; Cargo up 15.2%

CONCESSIONS FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES

Temporal Deviations from Flight Plans:

Megahubs International Index

Global Airport On-time Departure Performance Report September 2014

Industry Update ACI-NA Board of Directors Meeting

Air Carrier Update II Lufthansa Group

Growing Size and Complexity Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Preliminary World Airport Traffic 2009

Preliminary World Airport Traffic 2008 Passenger traffic growth flat; Cargo down by 3.6 percent

Travel Report Volume 20, Number 2 July 2011

Preliminary World Airport Traffic 2011 Passenger traffic up 4.9%; Cargo flat -0.1%

INFORMATION PACKAGE Airport Benchmarking Team. Airport Benchmarking Report. Global Standards for Airport Excellence. Project Coordinator:

Published: Nov Megahubs Index. The World s Most Connected Airports. oag.com OAG Aviation Worldwide Limited. All rights reserved

Federal Perspectives on Public-Private Partnerships (P3) in the United States

Project Coordinator: Research Director: North America: (United States of America) Asia Pacific: (Japan) Hankuk Aviation University.

World Class Airport For A World Class City

World Class Airport For A World Class City

INFORMATION PACKAGE Airport Benchmarking Team. Airport Benchmarking Report. Global Standards for Airport Excellence

Airport Characteristics: Part 2 Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Passengers Boarded At The Top 50 U. S. Airports ( Updated April 2

World Class Airport For A World Class City

CANSO Workshop on Operational Performance. LATCAR, 2016 John Gulding Manager, ATO Performance Analysis Federal Aviation Administration

US/Europe comparison of ATMrelated operational performance

Global Low Fare Search Comparison Summary Europe, Middle East, and Africa. September 2008

Kansas City Aviation Department. Update to Airport Committee January 26, 2017

World Class Airport For A World Class City

Megahubs International Index 2018

Ocean Stopover Cities by Itinerary

8 th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar. US/Europe comparison of ATM-related operational performance. June 30, 2009 Napa Valley, California

Vanderbilt Travel January 2019 Airfare Price Testing Testing Session, January 14, 9:30am 10:30am

J.D. Power and Associates Reports: Customer Satisfaction with Airports Declines Sharply Amid an Industry Fraught with Flight Delays

Travel Report Volume 19, Number 2 July 2010

Airline Network Structures Dr. Peter Belobaba

2010 US/Europe comparison of ATM-related operational performance

Have Descents Really Become More Efficient? Presented by: Dan Howell and Rob Dean Date: 6/29/2017

79006 AIR TRAVEL SERVICES 2001 AWARD

The O Hare Effect on the System

Airport Characteristics. Airport Characteristics

Selected highlights: The burgeoning Pacific market

fleet CALENDAR MAY 2018 JUNE 2020 THE MOST INCLUSIVE LUXURY EXPERIENCE

Aviation Gridlock: Airport Capacity Infrastructure How Do We Expand Airfields?

Kansas City Aviation Department. Update to Airport Committee October 20, 2016

Gateway Travel Program

busiest routes Key facts behind the world s 20 busiest routes

2016 Air Service Updates

HUBS, COMPETITION AND GOVERNMENT POLICY

Description of the National Airspace System

SEPTEMBER 2014 BOARD INFORMATION PACKAGE

Uncertainty in Airport Planning Prof. Richard de Neufville

5 th Airline Marketing Workshop. Zoom in 2004 Zoom out 2005

ACI-NA 2014 (FY13) Benchmarking Survey September 7, 2014

Transportation Research Forum

The Airport Credit Outlook

Istanbul Technical University Air Transportation Management, M.Sc. Program Aviation Economics and Financial Analysis Module 14 November 23, 2013

Associates 2009 Rental Car Satisfaction Study SM (Page 1 of 2)

turnaround tables Arriving and Departing OTP Variances for the World s Largest Airports Based on full year data 2017

North America s Fastest Growing Airports 2018

Station Capability List

A Methodology for Environmental and Energy Assessment of Operational Improvements

Data Communications Program

Foreword. Data from this publication may be published provided the source is quoted. February 2008

Privatization, corporatization, ownership forms and their effects on the performance of the world s major airports

Air Service and Airline Economics in 2018 Growing, Competing and Reinvesting

2016 Air Service Updates

Travel Report Volume 19, Number 4 January 2011

Free Flight En Route Metrics. Mike Bennett The CNA Corporation

2016 Air Service Updates

THE BEST VALUE IN LUXURY CRUISING

ACI-NA 2014 (FY13) Benchmarking Survey September 7, 2014

Operational Performance Workgroup. John Gulding Manager, Strategic Analysis and Benchmarking, ATO Office of Performance Analysis, FAA

2012 Airfares CA Out-of-State City Pairs -

Established and Emerging Hubs in the last Decade

2008 Annual General Meeting. YYC & YBW Airports in Motion

2016 Air Service Updates

ACI-NA BUSINESS TERM SURVEY APRIL 2017

The Need and Urgency for a Three-Runway System (3RS) August 7, 2014

Capacity Constraints and the Dynamics of Transition in the US Air Transportation

Puget Sound Trends. Executive Board January 24, 2019

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Department of Homeland Security.

Beyond Measure jdpower.com North America Airport Satisfaction Study

Questions regarding the Incentive Program should be directed to Sara Meess at or by phone at

State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division. PATA Hawai i. September 13, 2018

Transcription:

ATRS Global Airport Benchmarking Report 2003 Presented to Pacific Economic Cooperation Council (PECC) Conference, 5-6 September, 2003, Singapore The Global Airport Benchmarking Task Force of Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) www.atrsworld.org Asia Pacific: Peter Forsyth, Yuichiro Yoshida, Yeong-Heok Lee; Europe: Jaap de Wit, Eric Pels, Keith Mason, Nicole Adler, North America: David Gillen, Tae Oum, Bijan Vasigh, Chunyan Yu Project Coordinator: Tae Oum

Outline Objective of the Study; Sample Airports Comments on Previous Studies - Methods for Measuring and Comparing Efficiency and Cost Performance Gross Productivity and Costs why they can not be used for comparison Removing effects of the factors beyond managerial control Results on Residual Productivities and Cost Competitiveness

Objective of the Study To do a comprehensive, unbiased assessment of airport performance, including: Productivity and Efficiency Unit Cost Competitiveness -------------------------------------------------------------- Future: Aviation User charges levels; Impacts of Safety and Security on Airport; Identifying key areas need improving, and how

Objective of the Study - Cont. Identify effects of Airport operating environment Extent of Business Diversification (commercial services) Extent of outsourcing Service quality On productivity, unit cost and other performance measures, And remove the effects of variables beyond managerial control.

Most Previous Studies Limited to analysis of airports in a certain country or continent. Used less than comprehensive measures; Ignored Multiple Outputs/Services especially ignoring Non-Aeronautical Services (Commercial; Development, etc) Ignored so-called soft-cost inputs including outsourcing services Did not control for the factors beyond managerial control

New in 2003 Report Covers 2000 and 2001, and new airports added (2002 reports covers 1999 only) Variable factor productivity (VFP) Cost competitiveness indicator A brief survey of air travel security charge.

Airports Included in our Study Partial Data Full Data Canada-U.S. 43 airports 43 airports Europe 26 airports 19 airports Asia-Pacific 21 airports 14 airports ------------------------------------------------------ Total 90 airports 76 airports

Data Sources US FAA and DOT statistics; AEA Statistics ICAO Digest of Statistics: annual financial data for some airports ACI; IATA data annual traffic statistics Capacity information general information surveys (Asia Pacific and Europe) occasional and not complete IMF and World Bank various price indices including GDP deflators for service sectors Various government and other sources for security charges Obtained some data directly from our sample airports

Sample airport characteristics N. America Total Passengers Passengers/ % International % Aeronautical Customer Airport (000's) Movement Passengers Revenues Satisfaction* 2,000 2,001 2,000 2,001 2,000 2,001 2,000 2,001 2,000 2,001 ATL 80,162 75,849 88 85 7% 7% 48% 42% 3.92 3.68 BOS 26,973 24,200 62 53 16% 24% 46% 45% 3.44 3.44 CVG 22,538 17,270 47 44 4% 4% 57% 61% 4.13 4.13 DFW 51,349 55,151 73 70 8% 8% 52% 55% 3.85 3.51 DTW 35,535 32,294 64 62 11% 10% 54% 55% 3.23 2.98 EWR 34,188 30,500 76 70 25% 23% 70% 70% 3.63 3.28 HNL 23,017 21,096 67 65 22% 21% 29% 34% 3.44 3.44 IAD 20,661 17,860 43 45 18% 22% 61% 59% 3.55 3.35 IAH 35,251 34,975 73 74 16% 16% 46% 53% 3.88 3.56 JFK 32,856 29,400 95 101 57% 57% 72% 72% 3.32 3.13 LAX 67,303 61,025 86 83 26% 26% 41% 41% 3.39 3.15 MCO 30,485 28,167 85 88 8% 7% 36% 39% 3.89 3.89 MIA 33,621 31,668 65 67 48% 48% 38% 49% 3.44 3.23 MSP 36,752 35,171 70 70 5% 4% 48% 52% 3.97 3.84 ORD 72,144 66,805 79 73 15% 14% 60% 66% 3.73 3.44 PDX 13,823 12,704 43 46 4% 2% 43% 49% 3.74 3.74 PHL 24,918 23,927 51 51 11% 12% 63% 65% n/a 3.31 SEA 28,409 27,036 64 68 9% 9% 52% 52% 3.91 3.67 SFO 40,980 34,627 93 89 20% 22% 51% 52% 3.55 3.19 YUL 8,493 8,157 41 42 51% 51% 33% 31% 3.64 3.41 YVR 16,247 15,622 48 50 47% 49% 30% 32% 4.25 3.91 YYC 8,090 8,300 48 37 29% 29% 36% 37% 3.91 3.91 YYZ 28,930 28,043 68 69 57% 56% 62% 55% 3.67 3.36

Sample airport characteristics Europe Total Passengers Passengers/ % International % Aeronautical Customer Airport (000's) Movement Passengers Revenues Satisfaction* 2,000 2,001 2,000 2,001 2,000 2,001 2,000 2,001 2,000 2,001 Europe AMS 39,607 39,531 92 92 99% 99% 49% 48% 4.05 3.80 BRU 21,595 19,636 66 64 100% 99% 62% 62% 3.83 3.83 CDG 48,246 47,996 97 92 71% 90% 31% 33% 3.36 3.36 CPH 18,294 18,136 60 63 88% 90% 60% 60% 4.35 4.08 DUS 16,030 15,393 83 80 75% 76% 72% 72% 3.58 3.32 FCO 27,118 25,566 87 90 52% 52% 64% 65% 3.54 3.36 FRA 49,360 48,569 108 107 82% 83% 73% 70% 3.59 3.36 GVA 7,764 7,488 45 46 85% 86% 49% 48% n/a 3.40 HEL 10,004 9,972 60 60 69% 70% 69% 68% 4.28 4.05 LGW 32,066 31,182 123 124 91% 90% 46% 46% n/a 3.58 LHR 64,607 60,743 138 131 88% 89% 48% 48% 3.64 3.40 MAN 18,820 19,555 95 99 82% 83% 50% 52% 4.18 3.93 MUC 23,153 23,647 73 70 63% 64% 60% 59% 3.82 3.82 MXP 20,717 18,570 83 78 73% 76% 71% 71% 3.43 3.27 OSL 14,232 13,993 70 71 47% 48% 54% 52% 3.98 3.76 VIE 11,940 11,853 58 58 95% 95% 78% 77% 3.64 ZRH 22,627 21,013 69 68 94% 94% 53% 52% 3.99 3.72

Sample airport characteristics Asia Pacific Total Passengers Passengers/ % International % Aeronautical Customer Airport (000's) Movement Passengers Revenues Satisfaction* 2,000 2,001 2,000 2,001 2,000 2,001 2,000 2,001 2,000 2,001 BKK 23,534 30,624 166 152 69% 70% 44% 44% 3.60 3.46 HKG 29,610 32,553 175 157 100% 100% 62% 60% 4.03 3.92 KIX 20,576 19,342 166 157 57% 55% 47% 44% 3.87 3.87 KUL 14,733 14,539 134 128 70% 69% 58% 58% 4.16 4.16 PEK 21,691 24,176 116 109 26% 25% 61% 61% 2.99 2.99 SEL 36,727 22,062 155 136 49% 19% 31% 29% 3.09 3.09 SIN 28,618 28,094 155 148 100% 100% 42% 41% 4.31 4.16 SYD 23,800 24,303 78 83 33% 34% 33% 35% 3.82 3.87 TPE 18,681 18,461 161 149 100% 100% 65% 66% 3.27 3.35

Figure 34.1 Passenger Traffic: 1999-2001 North America 0 10,000,000 20,000,000 30,000,000 40,000,000 50,000,000 60,000,000 70,000,000 80,000,000 90,000,000 ATL ORD LAX DFW DEN PHX LAS MSP IAH SFO DTW MIA EWR JFK MCO YYZ SEA STL BOS PHL CLT LGA HNL BWI PIT SLC IAD CVG YVR DCA PDX CLE MEM RDU YYC YUL YEG 1999 2000 2001

70,000,000 60,000,000 50,000,000 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000,000 0 Figure 3.4.1 Passenger Traffic 1999-2001 Europe 1999 2000 2001 LHR FRA CDG AMS MAD LGW FCO MUC ORY ZRH BCN BRU MAN MXP ARN CPH DUS DUB OSL VIE HEL HAM BHX GVA CGN CIA

Figure 3.4.1 Passenger Traffic 1999-2001 Asia Pacific 40,000,000 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 1999 2000 2001 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 HKG BKK SIN NRT SYD PEK SEL KIX TPE MEL KUL ICN SHA CGK AKL PVG CHC HKT PEN CNX HDY

Figure 3.4.1d Percent Change in Passenger Traffic 2001 over 2000: North America 20% 10% North America Asia Pacific 0% -10% BWI -20% Europe -30% -40%

Figure 3.4.1 Share of International Passengers 2001: 120% 100% 80% North America Europe Asia Pacific 60% 40% 20% 0%

Sample airport characteristics Figure 3.4.5 Passengers per Aircraft Movement 2001: 250 200 150 North America Europe Asia Pacific 100 50 0

Airport Productivity Analysis Inputs Outputs Labor Other non-capital (soft cost) inputs Runways Terminals Gates (Air bridges) Aircraft movements Passengers Cargo Other revenues including concessions

Productivity MEASUREMENT Partial Factor Productivity (PFP) Measures: labor productivity Soft cost input productivity capital input productivity Need to go beyond PFPs Variable Factor Productivity (VFP) Total Factor Productivity (TFP)

PFP won t tell the whole story (YVR-00 = 1.0) Labour Soft Cost Input Capital Productivity Productivity Productivity Terminal Gate Runway 2000 2001 2000 2001 2000 2001 2000 2001 2000 2001 North America ATL 1.34 1.19 3.46 4.02 1.77 1.57 1.14 1.01 2.94 2.61 BOS 0.64 0.60 0.77 0.67 1.36 1.29 0.94 0.89 1.18 1.12 BWI 0.49 0.50 0.80 0.72 1.42 1.47 0.55 0.58 0.60 0.62 CLE 0.41 0.35 0.85 0.53 1.29 1.08 0.32 0.27 0.41 0.35 CLT 0.80 0.85 1.72 1.66 1.22 1.29 0.48 0.49 0.80 0.85 CVG 0.73 0.53 1.66 1.34 1.67 1.29 0.71 0.55 0.92 0.71 DCA 0.27 0.22 0.37 0.35 0.75 0.62 0.40 0.32 0.35 0.28 DEN 0.65 0.55 0.59 0.50 0.94 0.80 1.05 0.90 1.16 0.99 DFW 0.49 0.48 2.06 1.69 2.33 3.26 1.15 1.11 1.24 1.19 DTW 0.45 0.44 0.92 0.91 2.91 2.88 0.59 0.58 0.81 0.67 EWR 1.29 1.17 0.37 0.36 1.58 1.43 0.88 0.80 1.99 1.80 FLL 0.56 0.55 0.93 0.77 1.79 1.76 0.73 0.72 0.70 0.69 HNL 0.63 0.61 0.97 1.10 1.01 0.90 1.08 1.00 0.99 0.92 IAD 0.56 0.51 0.79 0.80 1.38 1.25 0.47 0.42 1.13 1.02 IAH 0.77 0.71 1.26 0.98 1.59 1.46 0.87 0.80 1.13 1.04 IND 0.55 0.53 2.88 2.23 2.54 2.45 1.28 1.24 0.77 0.74 JFK 1.20 1.03 0.26 0.24 0.80 0.68 0.58 0.50 1.54 1.32 LAS 0.39 0.37 1.29 1.02 2.02 1.92 0.70 0.67 0.95 0.90 LAX 0.51 0.45 1.09 0.84 2.86 2.60 1.58 1.44 3.32 3.03 LGA 0.71 0.74 0.24 0.27 1.14 1.26 0.49 0.54 1.00 1.11 MCI 0.35 0.35 1.00 0.80 1.15 1.13 0.38 0.38 0.47 0.46 MCO 0.72 0.61 0.60 0.49 0.75 0.64 0.79 0.68 1.43 1.22 MDW 0.24 0.26 0.56 0.44 2.93 3.19 0.56 0.61 0.19 0.21 MEM 0.89 0.91 1.60 1.45 2.13 2.17 0.76 0.78 0.64 0.65 MIA 0.50 0.41 0.62 0.63 1.60 1.37 1.17 1.00 2.79 2.39 MSP 0.94 0.80 1.73 1.26 1.70 1.44 0.71 0.60 1.65 1.40 ORD 0.78 0.73 1.09 0.88 2.32 2.17 1.18 1.11 2.03 1.90 PDX 0.83 0.86 0.78 0.72 1.12 1.06 0.79 0.75 0.72 0.69 PHL 0.49 0.49 0.77 0.71 0.65 0.66 0.67 0.68 0.90 0.90 PHX 0.73 0.75 1.22 1.23 1.19 1.17 0.87 0.89 1.63 1.67 PIT 0.47 0.49 0.36 0.38 0.91 0.94 0.37 0.38 0.56 0.58 RDU 0.54 0.56 2.62 2.40 1.75 1.83 0.48 0.51 0.61 0.64 SEA 0.43 0.43 0.78 0.67 1.50 1.49 1.10 1.09 1.95 1.94 SFO 0.47 0.38 0.82 0.53 2.07 1.84 1.39 1.24 1.57 1.39 SLC 0.43 0.42 1.31 1.31 2.29 2.30 0.54 0.54 0.57 0.57 STL 0.35 0.34 1.21 1.04 0.84 0.83 0.51 0.51 0.67 0.66 TPA 0.45 0.44 0.85 0.79 1.11 1.09 0.58 0.56 0.59 0.58 YEG 0.22 0.23 0.54 0.46 1.15 1.21 0.48 0.51 0.22 0.23 YOW 0.21 0.20 0.53 0.51 0.72 0.69 0.59 0.56 0.16 0.15 YUL 0.31 0.31 0.45 0.48 1.30 1.27 0.73 0.71 0.38 0.37 YVR 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 YYC 0.72 0.74 0.82 0.74 1.09 1.13 0.87 0.90 0.38 0.40 YYZ 0.60 0.56 0.66 0.53 1.16 1.18 0.86 0.88 1.13 1.15 Mean 0.61 0.57 1.05 0.94 1.51 1.47 0.78 0.74 1.07 1.00

Gross TFP Figure S-6 Gross Total Factor Productivity 3.000 Index, YVR00=1.0 2.500 2.000 1.5 0 0 1.0 0 0 North America Europe Asia Pacific 0.500 0.000 2001 2000

1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 Figure 4.3.2a Total Factor Productivity North America 2000 2001 ATL IND LAX RDU SEA PHX MEM MSP DFW YVR ORD EWR CLT MIA IAH FLL SFO PDX YYC HNL CVG BOS SLC LAS LGA DTW YYZ IAD TPA BWI MCO DEN PHL MCI STL YEG JFK MDW YUL YOW PIT CLE DCA Mean Index, YVR00=1.0

Potential Reasons for the Gross Productivity Differentials Potential Factors Beyond Managerial Control Airport size (Scale of aggregate output) Average aircraft size using the airport Share of international traffic Share of air cargo services Extent of capacity shortage - congestion delay

Potential Reasons for the Gross Productivity Differentials cont d Factors within Managerial Control Emphasis on commercial activities (non-aeronautical) Quality of Service (incl. passenger satisfaction) The Extent of outsourcing activities Managerial and technical efficiency (which we are trying to measure) We compute residual (net) productivity measures after removing effects of the Factors Beyond Managerial Control

Factors affecting Gross TFP Coefficients T-Value Intercept 0.897 8.750 Airport Size 0.146 5.732 %NonAviation 0.113 2.464 Terminal Operators 0.101 2.068 %Cargo 0.155 6.477 Capacity Constraints 0.248 7.871 R Square 0.480 Observations 196

1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 Residual TFP (YVR00=1) Figure S-7 Residual Total Factor Productivity North America Europe Asia Pacific ATL RDU IND YVR PHX YYC SEA CLT MSP LGA HNL FLL PDX EWR CVG MCO YOW LAS TPA MIA YYZ IAH IAD DFW SFO DCA LAX SLC STL YEG BWI PHL MCI DTW MEM ORD MDW YUL PIT BOS JFK CLE DEN BCN ARN LGW MAD ZRH OSL LHR CPH VIE BRU GVA AMS MUC FRA MAN ADP HAM HEL DUS AKL SYD KIX CHC HKG SEL SIN BKK NRT Thai-AAT PEK ICN PEN KUL 2001 2000 Index, YVR00=1.0

North America RTFP (YVR00=1) Figure S-12 Residual Total Factor Productivity North America 1.40 1.20 1.00 2000 2001 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 ATL RDU IND YVR PHX YYC SEA CLT MSP LGA HNL FLL PDX EWR CVG MCO YOW LAS TPA MIA YYZ IAH IAD DFW SFO DCA LAX SLC STL YEG BWI PHL MCI DTW MEM ORD MDW YUL PIT BOS JFK CLE DEN Mean Index, YVR00=1.0

1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 Europe RTFP (YVR00=1) Figure S-11 Residual Total Factor Productivity Europe Index, YVR00=1.0 HEL BCN ARN LGW MAD ZRH OSL LHR CPH VIE BRU GVA AMS MUC FRA MAN ADP HAM DUS Mean 2000 2001

Asia Pacific RTFP (YVR00=1) Figure S-10 Residual Total Factor Productivity Asia Pacific 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 2000 2001 Index, YVR00=1.0 Mean AKL SYD KIX CHC HKG SEL SIN BKK NRT Thai-AAT PEK ICN PEN KUL

Gross VFP Figure S-4 Gross Variable Factor Productivity 3.000 Index, YVR00=1.0 2.500 2.000 1.500 1.000 North America Europe Asia Pacific 0.500 0.000 2001 2000

3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 Figure 4.3.1a Variable Factor Productivity North America 2000 2001 ATL RDU CLT IND MEM PHX MSP DFW CVG HNL YVR IAH SLC ORD PDX YYC STL FLL DTW LAS LAX IAD BWI TPA BOS PHL MCI SEA EWR YYZ MIA DEN MCO CLE SFO YUL PIT JFK LGA YOW YEG MDW DCA Mean Index, YVR00=1.0

Factors affecting Gross VFP Coefficients T-Value Intercept 0.035 0.173 Airport Size 0.159 3.264 %International -0.142-6.137 %NonAviation 0.413 4.714 Terminal Operators 0.308 3.302 %Cargo 0.151 3.103 Capacity Constraints 0.177 2.816 R Square 0.380 Observations 196

1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 Residual VFP (YVR00=1) Figure S-5 Residual Variable Factor Productivity North America Europe Asia Pacific Index, YVR00=1.0 ATL CLT YVR RDU CVG YYC HNL MSP PHX IAH IND IAD DFW FLL YOW PHL STL YYZ MEM LAS TPA DTW PDX YUL BWI SLC MCO ORD EWR BOS MIA YEG SEA MCI LAX JFK CLE LGA SFO DCA PIT DEN MDW ARN BCN MAD CPH OSL AMS ZRH LGW LHR ADP BRU HEL GVA DUS MUC MAN FRA VIE HAM AKL CHC SYD SIN Thai-AAT PEN BKK HKG ICN KUL SEL KIX PEK NRT 2001 2000

North America RVFP (YVR00=1) Figure S-7 Residual Variable Factor Productivity North America 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 2000 2001 0.80 0.60 0.40 Index, YVR00=1.0 0.20 0.00 ATL CLT YVR RDU CVG YYC HNL MSP PHX IAH IND IAD DFW FLL YOW PHL STL YYZ MEM LAS TPA DTW PDX YUL BWI SLC MCO ORD EWR BOS MIA YEG SEA MCI LAX JFK CLE LGA SFO DCA PIT DEN MDW Mean

0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 Europe RVFP (YVR00=1) Figure S-6 Residual Variable Factor Productivity Europe Index, YVR00=1.0 ARN BCN MAD CPH OSL AMS ZRH LGW LHR ADP BRU HEL GVA DUS MUC MAN FRA VIE HAM Mean 2000 2001

Asia Pacific RVFP (YVR00=1) Figure S-5 Residual Variable Factor Productivity Asia Pacific 0.90 0.80 0.70 Index, YVR00=1.0 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 AKL CHC SYD SIN Thai-AAT PEN BKK HKG ICN KUL SEL KIX PEK NRT Mean 2000 2001

Cost Competitiveness determined by two factors Productive Efficiency Residual VFP Variable Input Prices

Variable Input Price (YVR=1) North America Europe Asia Pacific Variable Input Price Index 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 YOW YUL YYC YEG IND YYZ RDU PIT YVR STL ATL SLC CLT LAS MCI DFW HNL LAX CVG BWI CLE TPA PHL FLL PHX DTW MEM IAH SEA MCO MSP IAD MDW DEN MIA ORD PDX BOS SFO DCA JFK EWR LGA HEL BCN VIE MAD FRA HAM MUC DUS CPH ADP AMS BRU MAN ARN OSL ZRH GVA LGW LHR PEK PEN Thai-AAT SEL KUL BKK CHC AKL ICN SYD SIN HKG NRT KIX Index, YVR=1.0 2000 2001 North America Europe Asia Pacific

Cost Competitiveness (YVR=0) Cost Competitiveness Indicator % above or below YVR NRT KIX YYC CVG HNL IND YUL YYZ PHX STL YEG IAH DFW LAS MSP FLL SLC PHL TPA BWI MEM PIT DTW MCI IAD LAX CLE MCO SEA PDX ORD MIA BOS SFO DCA DEN JFK EWR MDW LGA BCN MAD HEL CPH ARN VIE AMS ADP FRA MUC DUS OSL HAM BRU ZRH MAN LGW GVA LHR HKG PEK BKK SYD SEL KUL ICN SIN RDU YVR CLT Thai-AAT PEN AKL CHC ATL 1.0 0.5 0.0-0.5-1.0-1.5-2.0 North America Europe Asia Pacific 2000 2001 Index, YVR=1.0

Top Performers based on residual TFP, residual VFP, CC Residual VFP (Labor+Soft cost inputs only): Atlanta, Charlotte, Vancouver, RDU, CVG, Calgary Auckland, Christchurch, Sydney (Arlanda, Barcelona, Madrid), Copenhagen, Oslo, Amsterdam, Residual TFP Atlanta, Raleigh-Durham, Indianapolis, Vancouver, PHX, YYC (BCN, ARN), Gatwick, (MAD), Zurich, Oslo, Heathrow, Copenhagen Auckland, Sydney, Kansai, Christchurch Cost Competitiveness Atlanta, Raleigh-Durham, Vancouver, Charlotte, Calgary (Barcelona, Madrid), Helsinki, Copenhagen Thai-AAT, Auckland, Christchurch, Beijing,

Future Efforts Benchmark airport charges further explore airport quality performance Measure the impact of increased airport security and safety measures on various performance measures Identify areas for managerial improvement, and how?

ATRS Benchmarking Work Task Force members are experts in cost, productivity benchmarking work; contributing time; The project expenses financed entirely by report sales 400+ pages; US$300 per set vol. 1: Executive Summary vol. 2: Main Text and Analysis vol. 3: airport profiles; methodologies Corporate member price: US$210 ATRS Corporate membership fees: One Year: US$ 500; Two Years: $1,000 Permanent Membership: US$3,000

ATRS Annual Conferences Vancouver (1997); Dublin (1998); Hong Kong (1999); Amsterdam (2000); Seoul (2001); Seattle (2002); Toulouse (2003) Istanbul (2004); Rio de Janeiro (2005) Details on ATRS activities are available on www.atrsworld.org

Thank You