WELCOME. Pikes Peak Summit Complex Environmental Assessment Scoping Meeting. August 25th, pm Colorado Springs, CO

Similar documents
Coronado National Forest Santa Catalina Ranger District

Colorado Springs & Pikes Peak Region Destination Master Plan

Trail Assessment Report

Bear Creek Habitat Improvement Project

Mt. Hood National Forest

PORT OF SEATTLE MEMORANDUM. COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 4g ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting February 9, 2016

B10. Agate Beach State Recreation Site

Trail # NW Tuesday, June DESIGN. Provide an Review the Provide an. Project Goals: System system. wayfinding

Kelly Motorized Trails Project Proposed Action

PROPOSED ACTION South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT United States Department of Agriculture

APPLICATION FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LETTER OF INTENT Amended

Williamson Rock/Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail (PCT) Project EIS. Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction

2. STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK // What We Heard

12, 14 and 16 York Street - Amendments to Section 16 Agreement and Road Closure Authorization

USDA Trails Strategy WRI: ENGLISH PEAK SURVEY. Theodore Mendoza San Diego State University June 6 th 2016 August 18 th Advisor: Sam Commarto

National Forests and Grasslands in Texas

Temporary Structure Permit Guide

Metrolinx Projects: Temporary Delegation for Long- Term Road Closures

Arlington County Board Work Session Eastbound Widening January 17, Amanda Baxter, VDOT Special Projects Development Manager

South Colony Basin Recreation Fee Proposal

PURPOSE AND NEED. Introduction

RE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan, Preliminary Ideas and Concepts

Recreational Services Plan. Gatineau Park. Phase 1: Planning Framework

Environmental Assessment Las Vegas Area Airspace Optimization Project

Dungeness Recreation Area County Park Master Plan

ETOBICOKE CREEK NORTH TRAIL PROJECT. May 18, 2017 at Michael Power High School 105 Eringate Drive, Etobicoke ON M9C 3Z7

MEETING MINUTES Page 1 of 5

Airport Master Plan for. Brown Field Municipal Airport PAC Meeting #3

Wallace Falls State Park Classification and Management Planning Stage 3 Preliminary Recommendations July 18, 2018 Sultan City Hall

Kit Carson-Challenger Ridge Trail Project Annual Performance Report-2014 October 22, 2014

COMMUNITY MEETING NOVEMBER 1, Wheaton Regional Park Pine Lake Trail

NEW MEADOWS PARK PROPOSED MASTER PLAN

Project Planning, Compliance, and Funding

Welcome to the Illinois High-Speed Rail Chicago to St. Louis Construction Update Meeting. Today s meeting will provide an overview of the Program,

APPENDIX F List of Commitments

Tallahassee-St. Marks Historic Railroad Trail

Mission 60% Figure 1: API Criteria Relative to Each Other

Community Development

Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road

Decision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation

LAND USE GUIDELINES NEW TOWN

KSBP HIGH. San Luis County Rgnl Airport San Luis Obispo, California, United States

COMMENT PERIOD. August 2, 2017 to September 1, 2017 INTRODUCTION

NORTHWEST SECTION CONTENTS: CLEVELAND PARK FOLWELL PARK RYAN LAKE PARK VICTORY PRAIRIE DOG PARK VICTORY PARK

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

Appendix 1: Best Management Practices For Hang Gliding and Paragliding in Jasper National Parks

Bloor Street West Rezoning Application for a Temporary Use By-law Final Report

KPAO HIGH. Palo Alto Arpt Of Santa Clara Co Airport Palo Alto, California, United States Diagram #1: Noise Abatement Procedures All Runways

BRYAN REGIONAL PARK. Presented by: Burditt Consultants November 13, 2018

Redtail Ranch Preliminary Plan and Filing No. 1 Final Plat, Review #2 (SP , SF )

Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action

Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in the Metroplex

Roadmapping Breakout Session Overview

TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTOR STAFF REPORT

Sibley LUPA. Board Executive Committee Meeting December 7, 2017

I-3 DFW Extension Public Hearing. June 2, 2011

2.1 TITLE: VMC PARKS MASTER PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY PROJECT UPDATE

This section evaluates the projected traffic operations and circulation impacts associated with the proposed upgrade and expansion of the LWRP.

ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL

Chapter 6: POLICY AND PROCEDURE RECOMMENDATIONS

Appendix F Public authorities responses

Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District

Triangle Land Conservancy Conservation Area Monitoring Report Carolina North

MCTC Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS)

2016 Regional Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Grant Application

Visitor s Survey Summary for the Pismo State Beach and Oceano Dunes State Vehicular Recreation Area Public Works Plan and Environmental Impact Report

PREPARED STATEMENT OF BRIAN WYNNE PRESIDENT AND CEO, ASSOCIATION FOR UNMANNED VEHICLE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT BACKCOUNTRY/WILDERNESS MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK

Master Commercial Developer Industry Forum

Figure 1: Little Dry Creek Trail Crossing

DECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction

Decision Memo Ice Age Trail Improvement (CRAC 37)

Clam Harbour Provincial Park

WATERBORNE TRANSIT. April 21, 2010

PRESENTED TO Town of Middlebury, VT. PRESENTED BY VTrans, VHB, Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc., and Kubricky Construction

Triangle Land Conservancy Conservation Area Monitoring Report Carolina North

Mohawk Hudson Bike Hike Trail Crossroad Connection Study

G Street Undercrossing. City Council Meeting Date: November 3, 2008

LESSON 5 Wilderness Management Case Studies

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REPORT PURPOSE EXISTING SETTING EXPANDING PARKLAND

Redesigning The Waterfront

Proposed Action. Payette National Forest Over-Snow Grooming in Valley, Adams and Idaho Counties. United States Department of Agriculture

Tracy Ridge Shared Use Trails and Plan Amendment Project

Transportation TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

Criddle/Vane Homestead Provincial Park. Management Plan

KTRK HIGH. Truckee Tahoe Airport Truckee, California, United States

Yard Creek Provincial Park. Management Plan

Description of the Proposed Action for the Big Creek / Yellow Pine Travel Plan (Snow-free Season) and Big Creek Ford Project

Land Management Summary

Longmont to Boulder Regional Trail Jay Road Connection DRAFT FINAL REPORT

Course Information. Required Text: AIARE Student Manual. (Instructor will provide on Day 1 of the course)

EAST DON TRAIL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Community Liaison Committee Meeting #3 July 15, :30 to 8:30 pm Flemingdon Park Library

SR 934 Project Development And Environment (PD&E) Study

Theme: Predominately natural/natural appearing; rustic improvements to protect resources. Size*: 2,500 + acres Infrastructure**:

CRANE LAKE TRAILS NETWORK AND SPACES

Winona Runway Shift Project

TRAIL ANNUAL REPORT

DESCRIPTION OF DRAFT LAND USE PLAN ALTERNATIVES. Overview of Draft Alternatives (Common Features and Themes)

FOREST FIRE LOOKOUT TOWERS OF THE ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FORESTS AND ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK

Transcription:

WELCOME Pikes Peak Summit Complex Environmental Assessment Scoping Meeting August 25th, 2015 3-7pm Colorado Springs, CO

PROCESS AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Public Scoping August 21- September 21, 2015 WE ARE HERE Analysiss Fall 2015/Winter 2016 EA/Draft FONSI Spring 2016 EA Review/Objection Period Spring 2016 Final EA/Decision Fall 2016

WHAT IS MY ROLE? How To Participate: - Sign in and join the project mailing list in order to stay informed. - Visit each station and learn more about the project. - Provide your written scoping comments at this meeting, by mail or through the project website. - Stay informed by visiting: http://www.fs.usda.gov/ project/?project=47229. - The meeting and venue accommodate special needs and comply with ADA and 508 regulations. Please let us know if you need assistance. Purposes of Scoping: The comments received during scoping will be used to guide the EA analysis. - Introduce and describe the proposed project. - Describe the key milestones and opportunities for public involvement. - Identify issues for analysis in the EA. - Gain an understanding of the concerns and issues expressed by interested parties. - Outreach to identify key stakeholders and obtain their perspectives.

HOW TO COMMENT Send your written comments to: - By Mail to Pikes Peak Summit Complex Project C/O District Ranger Pikes Peak Ranger District 601 S. Weber Street Colorado Springs, CO 80903 - By fax to 719-477-4233 - By phone via 719-636-1602 - Online at https://cara.ecosystem-management.org/ Public//CommentInput?Project=47229 Tips for making effective comments: - Be as specific as possible in your comments. - Remember we need your comments to frame the analysis for the EA. - Focus your comments on specific topics, issues, or other alternatives. Scoping comments must be received by September 21, 2015 in order to be considered in the analysis.

PROJECT OVERVIEW Design and construct new Summit Complex facilities: Restore disturbed sites to native tundra - Summit House Visitors Center - Plant Building - CSU s Communications Facility - U.S. Army s High-Altitude Research Laboratory (HARL) Remove the existing facilities Build new facilities adapted to the Pikes Peak summit environment Protect heritage resources Enhance visitor experiences Partners - City of Colorado Springs, Pikes Peak - America s Mountain - U.S. Army - Colorado Springs Utilities GREEN MOUNTAIN FALLS Pikes Peak Highway Pike National Forest TELLER EL PASO COLORADO SPRINGS Peak Summit ^Pikes Cog Railroad MANITOU SPRINGS Vicinity Map 0 0.5 1 2 Miles

PURPOSE & NEED The Purpose of and Need for the Action is focused on improving the quality of the recreational experience and facilities on the summit of Pikes Peak. This project seeks to provide a visitor experience Mountain. The purpose of the proposed Pikes Peak Summit Complex includes: - Provide an enhanced visitor experience at America s Mountain, a National Historic Landmark. - Consolidate Summit Complex facilities to reduce building footprints. - Promote continuity of building design. - Restore areas previously disturbed and reduce future site impacts. - Replace existing buildings that were built without considering the environment or optimizing the visitor experience.

PURPOSE & NEED The need for authorizing a new Pikes Peak Summit Complex includes: - Improve and enhance summit interpretive elements of historical - techniques. - Incorporate the Forest Service Built Environment Image Guide principles and the unique site conditions into the solution. - Replace unsafe structures. - Provide the public and Summit Complex employees a safe and - Accommodate the needs of a variety of existing special events and groups. - Improve and enhance pedestrian and vehicle circulation and parking at the Summit Complex.

PIKES PEAK & PROJECT HISTORY - 1820- First recorded ascent by Dr. Edwin James - 1873- First structure built atop Pikes Peak - 1889- Completion of the Pikes Peak Carriage Toll Road - 1891- The Cog railway completed - 1963- Current Summit House built - 1969- U.S. Army research building constructed - 1970s- CSU Communication Facility built - 1992- Pikes Peak Highway Master Plan completedrecommend implementing erosion and sediment control plan and replacement of the Summit House - 2002- City of Colorado Springs implements the Drainage, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan - 2011- Pikes Peak Toll Road is completely paved. - April 16, 2014 Decision to prepare an EA

PROJECT MAP Pikes Peak Highway Cog Railroad Project Map 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Existing HARL (To be removed) Conceputal Pedestrian Path Pikes Peak Highway Existing CSU Facility (To be removed) Existing Summit House (To be removed) Original Summit House Foundation Eisting Plant and Mechanical Building (To be removed) Cog Railroad 13950 13950 13950 13850 13800 13900 SUMMIT COMPLEX Building Site 1 Building Site 2 13950 13900 14100 13850 13900 13950 14000 14050 14000 13950 13900 Summit Complex 0 50 100 200 Feet 13850

PROJECT ELEMENTS KEY ELEMENTS ALTERNATIVE 1 ALTERNATIVE 2 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE Summit House (Visitor Center) Approximately 18,000 to 28,000 square feet within Building Site 1 TBD Remains as is at 12,000 square feet HARL Approximately 3,000 square feet colocated within Building Site 2 TBD Remains as is at 2,268 square feet Plant and Mechanical Building Approximately 3,000 to 5,500 square feet co-located within Building Site 2 TBD Remains as is at 12,000 square feet CSU Facility Approximately 160 square feet colocated within Building Site 2 TBD Remains as is at 850 square feet Removal of Existing Facilities All existing facilities would be removed All existing facilities would be removed All existing facilities remain Restoration Restore disturbed sites to native tundra Restore disturbed sites to native tundra None Events Continuation of existing events e.g. Hill Climb, The Ascent and Marathon, Fireworks Same Same Design Guidance Facility design will consider the Forest Service s Built Environment Image Guide Same N/A Pedestrian Circulation Enhanced outdoor experience that is ADA compliant and protects tundra ecosystem TBD None Pikes Peak Cog Railway Remains in current location Railway realigned, based on engineering feasibility Remains in current location Staging Areas Construction Activity (Planned to occur over multiple construction seasons) Several temporary staging areas will be required which could include, for example; Ski Area, Cove Pit and Devil's Playground Construction activities may require temporary closure of Pikes Peak Highway and limitations on use of some parking areas. Same TBD N\A N\A

ALTERNATIVES? Are there other alternatives that should be considered e.g. other site

ISSUES analysis than those that are considered minor or secondary. Using the space below, please note issues that should be considered in the EA. For example issues that might be analyzed include; visibility from key view points, sensitive species, access to the summit during construction, or impacts to cultural resources.

QUESTIONS Using the space below, please note any questions that you have regarding the proposed project. Answers to frequently asked questions will be posted on the project website.

WHO MAKES THE DECISIONS? Responsible Official: San Isabel National Forests and Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands. Nature of the Decision to be Made: proposed action or other action alternative that may be developed by the Forest Service as a result of scoping.