Part 2 - Hazard Identification and Risk Management Practical Examples

Similar documents
Information Notice. Version(s) AS350 B, BA, BB, B1, B2, B3, D L1 A2, C2, C3, U2 E, F, F1, F2, N, NP AF, AN, SN, UF, UN

AFI Flight Operations Safety Awareness Seminar (FOSAS)

Research on Controlled Flight Into Terrain Risk Analysis Based on Bow-tie Model and WQAR Data

Sonya Tietjen Consultant, Aviation Safety 26 September 2013 London, UK. FDM, Risk and Protecting your Assets

Route Causes. The largest percentage of European helicopter. For helicopters, the journey not the destination holds the greatest risk.

AERODROME SAFETY COORDINATION

Emergency Operations Plan Annex E: Helicopter Crash

FAA/HSAC PART 135 SYSTEM SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT SAFETY ELEMENT TRAINING OF FLIGHT CREWMEMBERS JOB AID Revision 1

Runway Safety Programme Global Runway Safety Action Plan

WORKING TOGETHER TO ENHANCE AIRPORT OPERATIONAL SAFETY. Ermenando Silva APEX, in Safety Manager ACI, World

IHSS 2011 Canadian Update. JHSIT(C) Ft Worth

Practical Risk Management

IATA Air Carrier Self Audit Checklist Analysis Questionnaire

Session 4. Cabin Safety Aspects in Accident Investigation

Andres Lainoja Eesti Lennuakadeemia

Synopsis of NTSB Alaska DPS Accident Hearing, Including Recommendations

Figure 3.1. Foreign Airport Assessment Aid

INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION REPORT 2017/051. Audit of the aviation safety programme in the African Union-United Nations Hybrid Operation in Darfur

Athens International Airport

CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY, PAKISTAN OPERATIONAL CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTENTS

Human external cargo draft

Appendix 6.1: Hazard Worksheet

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Foreign Air Operator Validation and Surveillance Course. Bangkok, Thailand 2 4 June ICAO Ramp Inspection Guidance Part II 1

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Airmen s Academic Examination

Introduction of Safety Risk Management and NAM/CAR & SAM Regional Examples of Runway Excursions

Aeronautical Studies (Safety Risk Assessment)

5.1 Approach Hazards Awareness - General

European Helicopter Safety Team - EHEST. EHEST Analysis of European Helicopter Accidents. Final EHSAT Analysis Report

Analyzing Risk at the FAA Flight Systems Laboratory

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

CHAPTER 5 AEROPLANE PERFORMANCE OPERATING LIMITATIONS

EASA Safety Information Bulletin

SUMMARY REPORT ON THE SAFETY OVERSIGHT AUDIT FOLLOW-UP OF THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION OF KUWAIT

PASSENGER SHIP SAFETY. Damage stability of cruise passenger ships: Monitoring and assessing risk from operation of watertight doors

Airspace Infringement

REGULATION No. 990/2017 on the operation of remotely piloted aircraft CHAPTER I. General provisions Article 1 Objective

DELIBERATE RISK ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

Appendix B. Comparative Risk Assessment Form

All-Weather Operations Training Programme

AFI Plan Aerodromes Certification Project Workshop for ESAF Region (Nairobi, Kenya, August 2016)

Index to Paragraph Numbers - OTAR Parts 91, 125, 135, 121 Issue 10-0

Civil Aircraft System Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility

Airmen s Academic Examination

B.S. PROGRAM IN AVIATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT Course Descriptions

INTERNATIONAL FIRE TRAINING CENTRE

AN-Conf/12-WP/162 TWELFTH THE CONFERENCE. The attached report

EU-OPS Operations Manual Checklist/Compliance Schedule

Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing ASIAS Overview PA-RAST Meeting March 2016 ASIAS Proprietary Do Not Distribute

FINAL REPORT OF THE USOAP CMA AUDIT OF THE CIVIL AVIATION SYSTEM OF THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY

Minimum Safe. Federal Aviation Administration Altitude Warning. Presented to: Pan American Aviation Safety Summit; Sao Paulo, Brazil

Flight test organisation

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

Managing Aviation Risk An Oil & Gas Operators Perspective. Oil & Gas UK, Aviation Seminar - 12 th September2017

Agenda Item 5: Group Discussion How Could We Prevent Runway Excursions (Risks and Lessons Learned)

SAFE COORDINATIONS IN THE PROVISION OF CAPSCA - AIRLINES CAPT. AHMED HASHIM HUSSEIN SAFETY MANAGER - BADR AIRLINES

- ORM Review - When to use ORM - Online ORM form usage - Common mistakes - Icing, The regs and You

Hazard Identification Questionnaire

Evidence Based Training from a Regulator s Perspective

FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL (FLTOPSP)

BAe-146 Next Generation Airtanker Frequently Asked Questions. Q. Why do you have to download on retardant at some airtanker bases?

The Board concluded its investigation and released report A11H0002 on 25 March 2014.

IHST Safety Intervention Strategy Workshop

OPERATIONS CIRCULAR 4 OF 2011

Identifying and Utilizing Precursors

Safety and the Private Aircraft Owner

series airplanes with modification and Model A321 series airplanes with modification

IDAHO AVIATION ACCIDENT SCORE CARD (IAASC)

Aerial work and specialised operations

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AVIATION Airworthiness Notices EXTENDED DIVERSION TIME OPERATIONS (EDTO)

Airworthiness Inspector Training Profile Worksheet

HEMS Seminar. Requirements & Guidance

TEXT OF AMENDMENT 36 TO THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT

Development of the Safety Case for LPV at Monastir

A Review by IHST (INDIA) Prepared by Air Vice Marshal K Sridharan VM (G) President, Rotary Wing Society of India Regional Lead

Participant Presentations (Topics of Interest to the Meeting)

IAGSA Survey Contract Annex

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management

The pilot and airline operator s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options. Session 2 Presentation 2

ICAO Aerodrome s Manual. AERODROME S INSPECTOR WORKSHOP St. Maarten, MAHO June 2012

Procedures for Approval of Master Minimum Equipment List

FIJI ISLANDS AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR

Annex II to Decision 2018/012/R AMC and GM to Part-ARO Issue 3, Amendment 8

2.1 Private Pilot Licence (Aeroplane/Microlight)

FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL

FLIGHT CREW LICENSING AND TRAINING PANEL (FCLTP) SECOND MEETING. Montreal, 31 January to 11 February 2005 AGENDA ITEM 5

RNP AR APCH Approvals: An Operator s Perspective

NATIONAL AIRSPACE POLICY OF NEW ZEALAND

REPORT 2014/065 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION. Audit of air operations in the United. Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan

Regulation (EU) 965/2012 on air operations. and related EASA Decisions (AMC&GM and CS-FTL.1)

Air Carrier Standards

NATA Part 135 Training Center Available Courses

TUCSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (TUS) DISABLED AIRCRAFT RECOVERY PLAN Section TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

TPA Emergency Planning and Response

SAFETY CASE OF AN UNMANNED CARGO AIRCRAFT DURING AN INTERNATIONAL TEST FLIGHT

LIGHT AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION

Special Conditions: The Boeing Company Model and Airplanes;

Form 91 Application for Approval of an EFB System

Advanced Flight Control System Failure States Airworthiness Requirements and Verification

Transcription:

Part 2 - Hazard Identification and Risk Management Practical Examples Matthias Klein, Manager General Affairs Fleet Safety Matthias.Klein@Eurocopter.com

Agenda 1. Concept 2. Hazard identification 3. Risk management 4. Preflight Risk assessment 5. Additional links 2

1. Concept ICAO SMS framework 1 Safety policy and objectives 1.1 Management commitment and responsibility 1.2 Safety accountabilities of managers 1.3 Appointment of key safety personnel 1.4 SMS implementation plan 1.5 Coordination of emergency response planning 1.6 Documentation 2 Safety risk management 2.1 Hazard identification process 2.2 Risk assessment and mitigation process 3 Safety assurance 3.1 Safety performance monitoring and measurement 3.2 The management of change 3.3 Continuous improvement of the SMS 4 Safety promotion 4.1 Training and education 4.2 Safety communication Source: ICAO 3

1. Concept Hazard : any source of potential damage, harm or adverse health effects on something or someone under certain conditions at work. Source ICAO DOC 9859 4

1. Concept 5

1. Concept Examples of Hazards and Their Effects Workplace Hazard Example of Hazard Thing Knife Cut Example of Harm Caused Substance Benzene Leukaemia Material Asbestos Mesothelioma Source of Energy Electricity Shock, electrocution Condition Wet floor Slips, falls 6

1. Concept There is a natural tendency to describe hazards as their consequence(s), i.e, a strong cross wind can cause runway excursions. Stating a hazard as consequence(s) : hides the nature of the hazard (i.e aircraft damage due to runway excursion) interferes with the identification of other important consequences. Well-named hazards : allow to identify the sources or mechanisms of the hazard allow to evaluate their consequence(s) 7 EAO / PEZZATINI/SMS general presentation / 1,v.0 / /17-01-2011 Eurocopter rights reserved

1. Concept Controlled area Safety Safetymodel: An An accident is is assimilated as as a loss lossof of control of of the the situation UE Recovery phase MITIGATION Accident Source: DEDALE Undesirable Event Event Loss Loss of of control on on the the situation UE= UE= all all event event phases phases which which can can lead lead to to an an accident accident without without efficient efficient barriers barriers Safety principles: Remain within safetycontrolled area If an UE occurs, react to recover and to return into controlled area Mitigation to reduce the consequences of an accident 8

Source: DEDALE 9

1. Concept Prevention Training Ergonomy Procedure to open the Windows Control Recovery Protection from outcomes Reduction of consequences Source: DEDALE 10

2. Hazard identification How to start? 11

2. Hazard identification Hazard identification, risk assessment and mitigation process: 1. What am I the most afraid of in my activity? 2. How could this event happen? 3. What can the consequences be (for the company, for others, for the environment, etc.)? 4. How can I reduce the probability of this event occurring (prevention)? 5. How can I reduce the consequences of this event (mitigation)? 6. What protective measures must be adopted and how can I implement them to prevent this event? 12

2. Hazard identification Hazard identification, risk assessment and mitigation process: 1.What am I the most afraid of in my activity? 2. How could this event happen? 3. What can the consequences be (for the company, for others, for the environment, etc.)? 4. How can I reduce the probability of this event occurring (prevention)? 5. How can I reduce the consequences of this event (mitigation)? 6. What protective measures shall be adopted and how can I implement them to prevent this event? 13

2. Hazard identification CFIT, CFIW, antenna/wire strikes, main or tail rotor obstacle strike? Non-stabilized approach? Loss of control, inadvertent entry in IMC? Ground collision? Mid-air collision? 14

2. Hazard identification Hazard identification, risk assessment and mitigation process: 1. What am I the most afraid of in my activity? 2.How could this event happen? 3. What can the consequences be (for the company, for others, for the environment, etc.)? 4. How can I reduce the probability of this event occurring (prevention)? 5. How can I reduce the consequences of this event (mitigation)? 6. What protective measures shall be adopted and how can I implement them to prevent this event? 15

2. Hazard identification 16

2. Hazard identification Advantages to use Bow Tie: Global display of the causal tree and the effects tree of the scenario of accident Identification of the actions to be handled first and foremost The shortest "Branches" to be handled first because the closest to the accident Visualization of the number of defenses before every danger It is recommended to put 3 defenses of different type Check that the same defense does not appear on another branch Cause of a second unsafe condition in case of failure 17

2. Hazard identification Erroneous Weight and Balance determination Payload incorrectly lashed or positioned Exceeded Weight and Balance limits affecting aircraft controllability Indiscipline, overconfidence Un-stabilised flight path Conditions likely to cause deviations Physiological phenomena Action beyond the competence of the Pilot In Command or beyond aircraft flight envelope Disturbed awareness Worsening weather conditions Reduced external visibility Spatial disorientation of the flight crew Loss of control on situation Night flight, dusk, dawn Hazardous weather conditions Critical damage, undetected before the flight Bird strike Collision with obstacles during take-off or landing Cargo slings/external load impacts with the rotors Failure caused by improper maintenance operation Anomaly on flying controls, airframe, loss of components in flight, alteration of flight crew s, field of vision Erroneous or missing information (IAS, attitudes, positions, etc.) Unsafe conditions of the aircraft resulting in an emergency situation in flight. Engine power anomaly on single-engine aircraft Engine power anomaly on twin-engine aircraft Loss of engine power (taking into account the type of operation and flight phase) 18

2. Hazard identification Erroneous Weight and Balance determination Payload incorrectly lashed or positioned Exceeded Weight and Balance limits affecting aircraft controllability Indiscipline, overconfidence Un-stabilised flight path Conditions likely to cause deviations Physiological phenomena Action beyond the competence of the Pilot In Command or beyond aircraft flight envelope Disturbed awareness Worsening weather conditions Reduced external visibility Spatial disorientation of the flight crew Loss of control on situation Night flight, dusk, dawn Hazardous weather conditions Critical damage, undetected before the flight Bird strike Collision with obstacles during take-off or landing Cargo slings/external load impacts with the rotors Failure caused by improper maintenance operation Anomaly on flying controls, airframe, loss of components in flight, alteration of flight crew s, field of vision Erroneous or missing information (IAS, attitudes, positions, etc.) Unsafe conditions of the aircraft resulting in an emergency situation in flight. Engine power anomaly on single-engine aircraft Engine power anomaly on twin-engine aircraft Loss of engine power (taking into account the type of operation and flight phase) 19

2. Hazard identification What can lead to engine failure? Engine system failure Fuel system failure Fuel pollution or inadequate fuel No more fuel available!!! Wrong management of fuel system Wrong management of engine system Loss of engine power 20

2. Hazard identification Engine system failure Failure of fuel system Fuel pollution or inadequate fuel No more fuel available!!! Improper use of fuel system Improper use of engine system Loss of engine power 21

2. Hazard identification Foreign Object Damage Failure of a component (design) Lack of maintenance check Errors, violations during maintenance task No anti-pollution test before refuelling No formal refuelling procedures Errors, violations during refuelling No cross check of fuel quantity delivered after refuelling Wrong calculation of Minimum Fuel Quantity before flight Unplanned diversion in flight Lack of knowledge Improper action of the crew Engine system failure Failure of fuel system Fuel pollution or inadequate fuel No more fuel available!!! Improper use of fuel system Improper use of engine system Loss of engine power 22

3. Risk management Hazard identification, risk assessment and mitigation process: 1. What am I the most afraid of in my activity? 2. How could this event happen? 3.What could the consequences be (for the company, for others, for the environment, etc.)? 4. How can I reduce the probability of this event occurring (prevention)? 5. How can I reduce the consequences of this event (mitigation)? 6. What protective measures must be adopted and how can I implement them to prevent this event? 23

3. Risk management Questions for assessing the severity of an occurrence: How many lives may be lost? Employees Passengers General public What is the environmental impact? Spill of fuel or other hazardous product Physical disruption of natural habitat 24

3. Risk management What is the severity of the property or financial damage? Direct operator property loss Damage to aviation infrastructure Third party damage Financial impact and economic impact for the company What is the likely media interest? 25

3. Risk management Hazard identification, risk assessment and mitigation process: 1. What am I the most afraid of in my activity? 2. How could this event happen? 3. What could the consequences be (for the company, for others, for the environment, etc.)? 4.How can I reduce the probability of this event occurring (prevention)? 5. How can I reduce the consequences of this event (mitigation)? 6. What protective measures must be adopted and how can I implement them to prevent this event? 26

3. Risk management Safety risk: safety risk is defined as the assessment, expressed in terms of predicted probability and severity, of the consequences of a hazard, taking as reference the worst foreseeable situation. Typically, safety risks are designated through an alphanumeric convention that allows for their measurement (Doc 9859 ICAO). Criticality = Probability x Severity 27

4 CATASTROPHIC CRITICAL MAJOR 5 SERIOUS Determination of initial Safety Risk: Loss of engine power on multi-engine helicopters 1 2 MINOR NEGLIGEABLE No consequences IMPROBABLE RARE REMOTE PROBABLE FREQUENT Legend : ACCEPTABLE MEDIUM SERIOUS UNACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE + FREQUENCY IMPROBABLE RARE REMOTE PROBABLE FREQUENT SEVERITY Peoples Environment Assets Brand image No consequences No injury No effect No damage No impact NEGLIGEABLE Damage < 10K MINOR Slight injuries Light impact Damage < 50K Limited impact MAJOR CRITICAL Major injuries One dead Important local No remediable Damage Damage effects effect < 250K < 1 M Important impact National impact CATASTROPHIC Description: Never occurred in aviation world Already occurred in aviation world Already occurred one time in the company Occurs in the company less than 3 times by year Frequently occurs in the company (more than 3 times by year) Superficial injuries Multiples deaths Negligeable effects Massive effects 3 Damage > 1 M Light impact International Impact 28

3. Risk management Role of defenses against the accident (safety barriers): Eliminate, counter the external and internal danger Control its effects Mitigate the consequences Types of defense against the accident: Technical (static or dynamic) Organizational Procedural Human (training, experience, etc.), less reliable 29

3. Risk management In-depth defenses: Adapted to the threat A series of at least 3 defenses Independent from each other Adaptable according to the evolution of the situation (intelligence) Maintained (maintenance) 30

3. Risk management Foreign Object Damage Failure of a component (design) Lack of maintenance checks Errors, infringements during maintenance task No anti-pollution test before refuelling No formal refuelling procedures Errors, infringements during refuelling No cross-check of fuel quantity delivered after refuelling Wrong calculation of Minimum Fuel Quantity before flight Unplanned diversion in flight Lack of knowledge Improper action of the crew Engine system failure Failure of fuel system Fuel pollution or inadequate fuel No more fuel available!!! Improper use of fuel system Improper use of engine system Loss of engine power 31

3. Risk management Foreign Object Damage Failure of a component (design) Lack of maintenance check Errors, violations during maintenance task Engine system failure Failure of fuel system Loss of engine power 32

3. Risk management FOD policy Foreign Object Damage Failure of a component (design) Lack of maintenance check Errors, violations during maintenance task Continuing Airworthiness Engine health program Seeking «bogus parts» Safety and Quality policy visibly endorsed by CEO Adequate supervision Updated and cleared work documentation Technicians trained and rated Adequate tools, workshop, environment No misson/time pressure «hurry up syndrom» «just culture» Engine system failure Failure of fuel system Air intake protection Safety barriers Loss of engine power 33

3. Risk management Engine system failure Failure of fuel system Loss of engine power Loss of control 34

3. Risk management Engine system failure Failure of fuel system Pilot is trained and applies the appropriate procedure Existing weight allows clearance from obstacles Loss of engine power Pilot is trained and applies the appropriate procedure Safety barriers In flight diversion to alternate or emergency airfield Safety barriers Pilot fights to keep the control on situation Loss of control on situation Pilot recalculates new flight endurance 35

3. Risk management Hazard identification, risk assessment and mitigation process: 1. What am I the most afraid of in my activity? 2. How could this event happen? 3. What could the consequences be (for the company, for others, for the environment, etc.)? 4. How can I reduce the probability of this event occurring (prevention)? 5.How can I reduce the consequences of this event (mitigation)? 6. What protective measures must be adopted and how can I implement them to prevent this event? 36

3. Risk management Pilot fights to keep the control on situation Loss of control on situation IMPACT! Accident avoided by chance Passenger injuries Aircraft damage 37

3. Risk management Pilot fights to keep the control on situation Loss of control on situation Crash absorber seats for crew and pax IMPACT! Additional individual ELT for crew GPS fleet tracking service Oversea flight: emergency floattation system Pax: mandatory preflight safety briefing Lifevests, liferafts, survival kits, first aid kits Pilot: wear of helmets and all suitable protective suits (gloves, fireproof suits ) Additional cabin extinguisher Mitigation Passenger injuries Aircraft damage 38

CATASTROPHIC Determination of resulting Safety Risk: Loss of engine power on multi-engine helicopters 1 2 4 CRITICAL MAJOR MINOR NEGLIGEABLE No consequences IMPROBABLE RARE REMOTE PROBABLE FREQUENT Legend : ACCEPTABLE MEDIUM SERIOUS UNACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE + FREQUENCY IMPROBABLE RARE REMOTE PROBABLE FREQUENT SEVERITY Peoples Environment Assets Brand image No consequences No injury No effect No damage No impact NEGLIGEABLE Damage < 10K MINOR Slight injuries Light impact Damage < 50K Limited impact MAJOR CRITICAL Major injuries One dead Important local No remediable Damage Damage effects effect < 250K < 1 M Important impact National impact CATASTROPHIC Description: Never occurred in aviation world Occurs in the company less than 3 times by year Frequently occurs in the company (more than 3 times by year) Superficial injuries Multiples deaths MEDIUM 3 Already occurred in aviation world Already occurred one time in the company 5 Negligeable effects Massive effects Damage > 1 M Light impact International Impact 39

3. Risk management Hazard identification, risk assessment and mitigation process: 1. What am I the most afraid of in my activity? 2. How could this event happen? 3. What could the consequences be (for the company, for others, for the environment, etc.)? 4. How can I reduce the probability of this event occurring (prevention)? 5. How can I reduce the consequences of this event (mitigation)? 6.What protective measures must be adopted and how can I implement them to prevent this event? 40

3. Risk management Several solutions are possible Adopting new procedures is costly Conduct a cost/benefit analysis (business case) Could be very detailed (exact costs, benefits) Could use relative values (low, medium, high) 41

BENEFIT 3. Risk management High Med Low Low 1 2 3 Med 2 4 6 42 COST High 3 6 9 Source: Dave Huntzinger

3. Risk management Key role of continuous risk monitoring: Register your hazards and risk analyses in a Database Review them periodically (set alarms) Conduct risk analysis whenever changes occur in your activity Use the adequate risk management form (paper or electronic) 43

UNDESIRABLE EVENT ULTIMATE ASSOCIATED EVENTS Precursors to the Undesirable Event Mechanical failure, malfunctioning of the fuel system - Crash after loss of control in flight - Damage/injuries in flight - Damage/injuries on the ground One engine inoperative on multi-engine aircraft REF: Revised: dd/mm/yyyy Defences: Control and Recovery Measures The engine systems and components are maintained and configured according to an approved program applied by an approved body Initial SERIOUS Responsible Risk level The body has a continued airworthiness program X The qualification of flight crews is up-to-date and they follow a regular training program covering normal and emergency procedures The flight crew is aware of the situation and applies the suitable procedure X Ingestion of FOD The organisation has a FOD prevention program X Unsuitable use of the engine Loaded fuel quantity insufficient for the flight (Flight planning error, error during refuelling operation) The traffic areas are regularly maintained and cleaned X The qualification of flight crews is up-to-date and they follow a regular training program covering aircraft operating procedures The company has introduced a Helicopter Flight Data Monitoring (HFDM) program X The refuelling company has clear and relevant procedures concerning the refuelling operations X The operators comply with the refuelling procedures X The flight crews cross-check the loaded fuel quantities before every flight X The company has introduced a policy to determine the fuel quantity to be loaded for the flight X Present MEDIUM In place Yes No Partly X X X Fuel contaminated or unsuitable for this type of engine The fuel system is maintained and checked in accordance with the approved program X The refuelling company has clear and relevant procedures concerning refuelling operations, including anti-contamination tests The flight crews cross-check the type and quality of the loaded fuel before every flight X X Unsuitable fuel management The company has introduced an in-flight fuel management policy X During preparation for flight, the flight crew has taken into account any change in the weather conditions and relevant impact on the flight path Briefings covering fuel management and aircraft fuel system operation are given at regular intervals In flight, the flight crews check the fuel consumption and its change at regular intervals X X X 44

3. Risk management Risk management form (cont d) Unplanned change of flight path Meteorological phenomena (icing, heavy rain, etc.) In the event of system malfunctioning, the flight crews apply the suitable procedure X According to the overflown area, the flight crew has selected suitable and accessible alternate fields X The flight crew takes into account these events and their consequences on the fuel management X The flight crew is aware of the meteorological phenomena encountered and acts accordingly (avoidance action, use of MPAI, de-icing, etc.) X Ultimate Events (if defence is insufficient) Protective measures: Responsible Yes No Partly Crash after loss of control in flight Damage/injuries in flight Damage/injuries on the ground Determination of a risk exposure time in performance class 2 (refer to appendix 1, OPS paragraph 3.517) Off-shore flight: emergency floatation gear installation X X Installation of energy-absorbing seats (flight crews and passengers) X Subscription to a service ensuring a real-time follow-up of the aircraft flight path X Carrying and wearing rescue material and equipment (life rafts, life vests, waterproof flight suits, etc.) X Carrying survival kits in addition to approved kits for flight over inhospitable areas X Carrying individual emergency locator transmitters (according to the type of mission) X Provision of crash helmets, gloves and fireproof flight suits for flight crews according to the type of flight X Emergency evacuation training (HUET type) performed at regular intervals X Routine safety briefing for passengers before boarding, reminding them of the danger of rotors, safety routings, aircraft evacuation rules, emergency exit operating procedure, use of rescue equipment, etc. X 45

3. Risk management To summarize: Identify Identify the hazard the risk and potential outcomes Control the risk! 46

4. Preflight risk assesment Preflight risk assessment: FAA Flight risk assessment tool (Info 07015 dated 03 JUL 2007) EHSIT preflight risk assessment Could be adapted to specific flight operations Pre-approved solutions All fixes identified before departure Could be filed with departure paperwork Ops knows what pilots are doing or not With FDM, gives a system overview Could be adapted for Pre-work risk assessment (maintenance, ramp, etc.) 47

4. Preflight risk assesment Preflight risk assessment: Personnel: Physical state Qualification Team composition Material: Aircraft status (MEL) Tools Situation: Environment: Weather Terrain Day/night Set situation awareness Ambient noises, etc. Means for Hazard Identification Show the way to assess the risk Operation: Routine/important Urgent/not urgent Vital Easy/complicated 48

4. Preflight risk assesment Source EHEST 49

5. Additional links Links: http://www.icao.int/anb/fls/icaosafety.html http://easa.europa.eu/essi/index.html http://www.ihst.org/ http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/safety_culture http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/opssvs/aviationsafetymenu.htm http://www.eurocopter.com/site/en/ref/safety_36.html http://www.eventreporting.org/ 50

Ready now!!! 51

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION 52