Attachment No. 20 RRLRT No. 1. Committee. Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

Similar documents
PART 8. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES MANUAL FOR WORK ZONES

AREMA C&S Manual Index (Includes 2018 Revisions) Volume SECTION 3 - HIGHWAY RAIL GRADE CROSSING WARNING SYSTEMS

K SIGNAGE & TRAFFIC CONTROL. Table of Contents

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Quiet Zone Process. Background:

Grade Crossings in High Speed Rail Corridors

Document Control Identification. Document History. Authorisation. Rail Safety Manager Brookfield Rail

Draft proposed amendments. Chapter Terminology

HIGHWAY RAIL GRADE CROSSING CONSOLIDATION PROGRAM

HISTORY AND REVIEW OF RAILWAY-HIGHWAY GRADE CROSSING WARNING SYSTEMS AND THE GENESIS OF STANDARD SPECIFICATION

22-23 Pavement Marking Items. (Pages 7 & 8 removed)

Non-Motorized Transportation

PARKS CANADA SIGNING ALONG PROVINCIAL HIGHWAYS

Provincial Railway Technical Standards

ICAO Standards. Airfield Information Signs. ICAO Annex 14, 4th Edition Aerodrome Design and Operations

SCOPE Chapter 2D shall Apply to Any Road or

Snowmobile Trail Signing REF: DNR Trail Signing Handbook

Quiet Zone Evaluation for Huron, Ohio

MEMORANDUM. ~Department. TO: District Engineers DATE: February 3,2012. Texas. Carol T. Rawson, P.E., Director ~ t~ Pt Traffic Operations Division C /"

IC Chapter 7.7. Railroad Grade Crossings Fund

ROAD TRAFFIC (PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS) (JERSEY) ORDER 1982

University Region Non-Motorized Plan 2015

National Highway-Rail Crossing Inventory Rule & GCIS

Section 32 TABLE OF CONTENTS Airfield and Aircraft Operations. 32.A General B Aircraft

APPENDIX H MILESTONE 2 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS OF THE AT-GRADE CROSSINGS

Lake Erie Commerce Center Traffic Analysis

RAILROAD QUIET ZONE PROJECT

HIGHWAY RAIL GRADE CROSSING 4 QUAD GATES. William H. Watson. Amtrak

Welcome Consultation Meeting for the Development of the Railway-Roadway Grade Crossings Regulations. May and June, 2012

2003 Edition - Revision 1 Page 2F-1

2011 No ROAD TRAFFIC. The Traffic Signs (Amendment) Regulations and General Directions 2011

Becker County Trail Routing Feasibility Study

The Baker/Carver Regional Trail is intended to

CHAPTER 2H. RECREATIONAL, HISTORICAL MARKER, TRAFFIC GENERATOR AND CULTURAL INTEREST AREA SIGNS

Chicago St. Louis High-Speed Rail. Braidwood Construction. Local Officials Briefing August 7, 2014

March 4, Mr. H. Dale Hemmerdinger Chairman Metropolitan Transportation Authority 347 Madison Avenue New York, NY Re: Report 2007-F-31

Hazardous Cattle Crossing: Use of Flashing Amber Lamps

The Light Rail System Safety & Grade Crossing Equipment

Level Crossings Configuration Standards

20mph Speed Limit Zones

County of Elgin Tourism Signage Policy Addendum A

FINAL. Bicycle/Pedestrian Feasibility Study City of DeBary Dirksen Drive Trail. Prepared For: Volusia County MPO

Pedestrian Safety Review Spadina Avenue

Traffic Management Plan 2018

POLICY DCS-04: Tourism Directional Sign Policy. Development and Cultural Services

SECTION 32. Airfield and Aircraft Operations

Railway-Highway Crossing at Grade Regulations: Guidelines for British Columbia s Provincial Heritage Railways

Grade Crossing Regulations

AS/NZS :2015. Lighting for roads and public spaces AS/NZS :2015. Part 4: Lighting of pedestrian crossings. Australian/New Zealand Standard

An Orientation to Today s Webinar

Exterior Wayfinding Signage Design Standards

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. DATE: August 31, Pamela Dalcin-Walling/Dokken Engineering. Daniel Yau and Victor Baltazar/Y&C

St. Dennis Drive Conversion of Traffic Lanes to On- Street Parking and Bicycle Lanes

AERODROME MARKINGS AND SIGNALIZATION

PART 2. SIGNS Chapter 2D. Guide Signs - Conventional Roads

STEVENS POINT QUIET ZONE

4. Safety Concerns Potential Short and Medium-Term Improvements

APPENDIX D FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATIONS, PART 77

FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE FACILITIES IN VIRGINIA. Catherine C. McGhee Senior Research Scientist

What do they mean to you?

Parking Amendments - Bay Street, between Harbour Street and Queens Quay West (York Street, Bay Street, and Yonge Street Ramp Removal)

Traffic Note 32. Use of fluorescent material on traffic signs - guidelines. Date: September Authorisation: Peter Croft, Manager Safer Roads

THE DEFENCE COMMITTEE, in pursuance of Articles 34A and 42 of the Road Traffic (Jersey) Law, 1956, 1 as amended, 2 hereby orders as follows: -

FRONT COVER. Derby Quiet Zone Study Cover

Regional Wayfinding Sign Strategy Thurston County Trails 2017

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES-AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT STUDY GROUP (AIS-AIMSG)

Auburn Trail / Ontario Pathways Trail Connector Feasibility Study Public Information Meeting Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

Lake Apopka Trail Loop Design Guidelines

The following criteria shall be applied within the boundaries of the AO District:

GUIDELINES FOR SNOWMOBILE TRAIL SIGNING & PLACEMENT

AERODROME OPERATING MINIMA

DRIVING OF VEHICLES ON THE MOVEMENT AREA - AIRPORT VEHICLE OPERATOR PERMIT (AVOP)

Traffic Calming Measures

Tallahassee-St. Marks Historic Railroad Trail

395 Express Lanes Project Update

Vasona Light Rail Signal Design Challenges. Hugh D. MacGillivray, Hatch Mott MacDonald Dennis Mellon, Santa Clara County Transportation Authority

LANDER COUNTY RAIL ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2006

ADVANCED WARNING SYSTEM FOR SHARED USE CROSSING ON HOWARD STREET EAST OF NORDICA AVENUE

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

GK/GN0692. Guidance on Level Crossing Interface Requirements. Rail Industry Guidance Note for GK/RT0192. Published by

Longmont to Boulder Regional Trail Jay Road Connection DRAFT FINAL REPORT

Report on Installation of Wayside Horns at Railroad Crossings and Railroad Trench System

ELECTION SIGN GUIDELINES

Railroad Safety Trail

Version TEXAS DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION. Rail Division. TRIMS User s Guide

"TOUCAN" - An unsegregated crossing for pedestrians and cyclists

Michigan s Engineering Safety Program for Local Roadways

Project Deliverable 4.1.3d Individual City Report - City of La Verne


5.1 Introduction 5-1. Modified on 7/14/05

Meeting Summary. 1 June 5, 2017 CAC Meeting Summary

02/06/2016. TSRGD 2016: Signals and cycling. Sally Gibbons Senior Engineer Traffic Division 2 June Legislation. IHE Traffic Signal Design Course

ICAO Recommended Airport Signs, Runway And Taxiway Markings. COPYRIGHT JEPPESEN SANDERSON, INC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Revision Date:

CITY OF WATERLOO ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS. FINAL ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS June 20, 2016

Proposed Bicycle Lanes on Yonge Street from Queens Quay to Front Street

Second Avenue: Union Street to Lenora Street, Condominium Owners c/o Michael McQuaid 1521 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98101

CHAPTER 16 STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND OTHER PUBLIC PLACES*

Transcription:

Attachment No. 20 RRLRT No. 1 TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TOPIC: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION RRLRT TC Draft: 06/23/2011 RRLRT TC Approval: 06/27/2014 Transmitted to Sponsors: 03/25/2014 Council Approval: 06/28/2014 ORIGIN OF REQUEST: NCUTCD / RR/LRT TC AFFECTED SECTIONS OF MUTCD: Proposed New Section 8E SUMMARY: The purpose of these changes is to provide standardization of traffic control devices for grade crossings of highways with busways. Busways operate similar to light rail transit, and the proposed traffic control devices are similar. Where it is determined to be necessary based on engineering judgment, automatic gates may be used to supplement and enhance the meaning of traffic signal indications. Automatic gates may especially be of benefit where there are potential turning moveme nt conflicts with the busway, where the bus operates at a speed that prevents safe stopping short of an obstruction within the busway. Where used, automatic gates at a highway-busway grade crossing would exhibit the operating characteristics of automatic gates used at highway-rail and highway-lrt grade crossings. Page 1 of 10

DISCUSSION: The proposed changes have been reviewed by the RR/LRT TC. It was recommended that the proposed changes be sent for sponsor comment for review at the January 2013 meeting of the NCUTCD. RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE MUTCD Note: All text proposed in this Recommended Change NEW to the 2009 Edition of the MUTCD is shown in BLUE. Explanatory comments are shown in GREEN. Page 2 of 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 CHAPTER 8E. BUSWAY GRADE CROSSINGS Section 8E.01 Introduction The design and operation of a busway is similar to light-rail transit in a semiexclusive alignment. Guidance Highway-busway grade crossings should be equipped with an active busway grade crossing warning system unless an engineering study indicates that the use of STOP signs or YIELD signs alone would be adequate. Standard Where a busway and a railroad are adjacent to one another such that the active grade crossing warning system and the active busway grade crossing warning system share common grade crossing traffic control devices, the warning system for the railroad shall control the operation of all grade crossing traffic control devices, and the warning system for the busway shall be interconnected with the active grade crossing warning system to provide notification of an approaching bus to the active grade crossing warning system. Section 8E.02 Bus Only Lane Signs A Bus Only Lane (R15-4d or R15-4e) sign may be used on a roadway lane limited to only bus use to indicate the restricted use of a lane. The overhead R15-4e Bus Only Lane sign may be used as an alternative to the post-mounted R15-4d sign. Guidance: If used, the R15-4d Bus Only Lane sign should be installed on a post adjacent to the roadway containing the bus lane. See Chapter 2G for additional information regarding preferential lane signing. See Chapter 3D for information regarding preferential lane pavement markings. Standard: If used, the R15-4e Bus Only Lane sign shall be mounted over the Page 3 of 10

47 48 49 lane to which it applies. 50 51 52 R15-4d 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 R15-4e Bus Only Lane Signs Section 8E.03 Bus-Activated Blank-Out Turn Prohibition Signs Busway operations can include the use of bus-activated blank-out signs for turn prohibition signs. The signs are typically used on roads paralleling a busway where road users might turn across a busway. Guidance: A bus-activated blank-out turn prohibition sign (R3-1, R3-2, R3-4, R3-18 or R3-27) should be used where an intersection is within 100 of a highwaybusway grade crossing and is controlled by STOP sign, or is controlled by traffic control signals with permissive turn movements for road users crossing the busway. A bus-activated blank-out turn prohibition sign may include a blank-out BUS COMING message or a Bus Approaching blank-out warning sign (see Section 8E.05), or both. If used, the word message and the Bus Approaching sign may be flashed. Page 4 of 10

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 As an alternative to bus-activated blank-out turn prohibition signs at intersections with traffic control signals, exclusive traffic control signal phases such that all movements that cross the busway have a steady red indication may be used in combination with No Turn on Red (R10-11, R10-11a, or R10-11b) signs (see Section 2B.54). Standard: Turn prohibition signs that are associated with preemption or priority shall be visible only when the highway-busway grade crossing turn prohibition is in effect. 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 BUS COMING Bus-Activated Blank-Out Turn Prohibition Sign Section 8E.04 Highway-Busway Grade Crossing Advance Warning Signs Guidance: A Highway-Busway Grade Crossing Advance Warning sign should be used on each highway in advance of every busway grade crossing except in business or commercial areas where active highway-busway grade crossing traffic control devices are in use. A BUSWAY supplemental plaque should be installed with every Highway-Busway Grade Crossing Advance Warning sign. Page 5 of 10

115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 Highway-Busway Grade Crossing Advance Warning Sign [The side view symbol of a bus is consistent with the side view symbols on vehicular traffic warning signs in Figure 2C-10. FHWA staff has confirmed that they will test alternative bus symbols before final approval of this sign] Section 8E-05 Busway Warning Sign A Busway Warning sign with a one-direction arrow for one-way busways or a two-direction arrow for two-way busways may be used at the crossing point of highway-busway grade crossings where there are no active traffic control devices. As an alternative to the Busway Warning sign, the legend TWO-WAY BUSWAY may be used at two-way busways. Page 6 of 10

139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 Busway Warning Sign [The design of this sign is consistent with the design of crossing signs in Figures 2C-10 and 2C-11 which use the W16-7P diagonal downward pointing arrow when the sign is placed at the location of the crossing point. FHWA staff has confirmed that they will test alternative bus symbols before final approval of this sign] Section 8E.06 Bus Approaching-Activated Blank-Out Warning Sign The Bus Approaching-Activated Blank-Out warning sign supplements the traffic control devices to warn road users crossing the busway of an approaching bus. A Bus Approaching-Activated Blank-Out warning sign may be used at signalized intersections near busway grade crossings or at crossings controlled by STOP signs. 165 166 Page 7 of 10

167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 Bus-Activated Blank-out Sign [This sign is consistent with the front view symbol of LRT on the existing W10-7 blank-out warning sign] Section 8E-07 Use of Traffic Control Signals for Control of Buses at Busway Grade Crossings Busway grade crossings can occur at intersections or at midblock locations, including public and private driveways. Guidance: Bus movements at busway grade crossings that are equipped with traffic control signals should be controlled by special bus signal indications. Bus signals that are used to control only bus movements should display the light rail transit signal indications illustrated in Figure 8C-3. Standard traffic control signal indications may be used instead of bus signals to control the movement of buses. Standard: If a separate set of standard traffic control signal indications (red, yellow, and green circular and arrow indications) is used to control bus movements, the indications shall be positioned so they are not readily visible to motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists (see Section 4D.12). If the busway crossing control is separate from the intersection control, the two shall be interconnected. The signal indications conflicting with the bus phase shall not be shown until after the bus has cleared the crossing. Bus signals may be used at busway grade crossings and at intersections where buses operate in mixed traffic in conjunction with standard traffic control signals where special bus signal phases are used to accommodate turning bus vehicles or where additional bus clearance time is desirable. Guidance: Bus signal faces should be separated vertically or horizontally from the nearest highway traffic signal face for the same approach by at least 3 ft. Page 8 of 10

212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 At busway grade crossings with traffic control signals, preemption control or priority control of the traffic control signal may be given to buses. Section 4D.27 contains information about preemption and priority control of traffic control signals. Section 8E-08 Busway Automatic Gates Automatic gates may be used to supplement traffic control signals at highway-busway grade crossings. Standard: Busway automatic gates, if used, shall conform to standards set forth in Section 8C.04 for Automatic Gates and shall be standard railroad size, striped with 16-inch alternate vertical, fully retroreflectorized red and white stripes. Flashing red lights in accordance with the Standards for those on railroad gates shall be included on the gate arm and they shall only be operated if the gate is closed or in the process of being opened or closed. In the horizontal position, the top of the gate shall be approximately 4 feet above the pavement. Busway automatic gates, if used, shall be interconnected with the busway traffic control signals. Busway automatic entrance gates shall be designed to fail-safe in the down position. Four quadrant Busway Automatic Gates shall conform to requirements set forth in Section 8C.06. Section 8C.04 contains further details regarding automatic gates and Section 8D.06 contains details regarding pedestrian automatic gates. Section 8E-09 Traffic Control Signals Near Highway-Busway Grade Crossings If a traffic control signal is near an active busway grade crossing warning system, refer to Manual Parts 8C.09, 8C.10, 8C.11 and 8C.12. Section 8E-10 Pathway-Busway Grade Crossings A pathway-busway grade crossing may be controlled using bus signals Page 9 of 10

259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 for the busway approaches and pedestrian signals for the pathway approaches if the operation of the busway provides for the bus to be able to stop before entering the pathway. A Busway Warning sign may be used at pathway-busway grade crossings with no active traffic control devices. Standard: If an active busway grade crossing warning system is used at a pathway-busway grade crossing, a bell or other audible warning device shall be provided for each pathway approach to the crossing. Page 10 of 10