What did people think in 1970?

Similar documents
Aeronautics & Air Transport in FP7. DG RTD-H.3 - Aeronautics Brussels, January 2007

Aeronautics & Air Transport in FP7

Transformation in Procurement. Challenges for the Global Aircraft Industry. HAL Executives Presentation Toulouse, October 13, 2014

MRO Trends: Airbus update

ITA Europe 2015 Keynote Speaker

NASA Aeronautics: Overview & ODM

Technical Press Briefing

! "#$ #%& Challenge the future. Delft University of Technology

Beijing, 18 h of September 2014 Pierre BACHELIER Head of ATM Programme. Cockpit Initiatives. ATC Global 2014

Athens International Airport, Marketing Workshop. The Challenges facing Air Transport. John Blanchfield Director, Technical Marketing, Airbus

Maintenance Cost Estimation Method of an Aircraft Manufacturer

Operational Interruption Cost Assessment Methodology

Towards the Future ATM

Africa, Airbus; A vision of the future

Airport Compatibility

Fuel and Flight Efficiency Services by Airbus

Airbus A320family FOPP Air Flow Deflector

ATSAW. (Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness) Presented by Laurent VIDAL - Surveillance systems manager Support to sales & programs

Morgan Stanley Commercial update. Morgan Stanley. Airbus Commercial Update. Mark Pearman Wright Head of Corporate & Investor Marketing

Think the solution, experience the change

Available On-Board Technologies For Runway Excursions Prevention

Designing for ease of future maintenance

Lithium Battery as Cargo

How a global corporation can benefit from the international equivalence of national measurement standards

Stall. Review of the Fundamentals, the Procedure and the Training. Presented by Capt. Christian Norden/ Flight Crew Development

Thales on the Civil Aerospace market

Airbus Commercial Update

Overview of NASA Aeronautics. Jaiwon Shin Associate Administrator Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate April 21, 2015

ATR THE SHORTCUT TO YOUR DESTINATION

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR MOBILITY AND TRANSPORT

Air Transport Forecast & Scenarios Key drivers for Scenario building. EFONET Workshop The Hague November 21st 2008

D8ULTRA-EFFICIENT COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT

Colombian PBN implementation: El Dorado case study

I AO Chi h e i f E c E on o o n m o i m c i A na n ly l s y is i & P o P l o ilc i y y Se S ctio i n

AP/FD TCAS and TCAP. Airborne Conflict Safety Forum Harry Nelson. A reminder and update. Month 20XX

In order to be eligible, all students participating as individuals or in teams (of no more than four students), must meet the following requirements:

NAVBLUE: Reach for the skies

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

Multi/many core in Avionics Systems

Importance of Fundamental Research for the Future of Aerospace Industry in the 21st Century

D8ULTRA-EFFICIENT COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT

Inadvertent Slide Deployments Update

ATR-600 SERIES THE LEADING TURBOPROP

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

FLIGHT PATH FOR THE FUTURE OF MOBILITY

International Conference on Integrated Modular Avionics Moscow

Go-Around Procedure. Flight Instructor Seminar / Miami, May 24 th and 25 th, 2011

GANP 2019/ASBUs. Olga de Frutos. Marrakesh/10 th December Technical Officer Air Navigation

WORLDWIDE SYMPOSIUM ON ENABLING THE NET-CENTRIC INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT:

NATIONAL AIRSPACE POLICY OF NEW ZEALAND

E-RECORDS. Heading towards a Paperless operation SWARAN SIDHU - HEAD OF FLEET TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT

New generation aircraft in the instrument approach domain. Jean-Christophe Lair Airbus Test pilot 1 st Feb. 2017

Combined ASIOACG and INSPIRE Working Group Meeting, 2013 Dubai, UAE, 11 th to 14 th December 2013

Air Traffic Management

Content. Study Results. Next Steps. Background

CEE 5614 and CEE Aircraft Classifications. Spring 2013

MY AGENDA FOR TODAY. Today s Partners for Tomorrows aviation. Page 3

OLM FBW 2006 Toulouse September Head Up Display

Overview of the Aviation System Block Upgrades (ASBUs) Concept and PBN

A380: Designed for Airports

AIRBUS FLY-BY-WIRE A TOTAL APPROACH TO DEPENDABILITY

Market Realities and Partnership with Morocco

Air Transport Industry

Fokker Technologies The Fokker mind, heart and soul

Services by Airbus Training. A350XWB Reaching new horizons together

A320 FAMILY: The most successful aircraft family. Key Figures* 20% fuel burn reduction. 5% lower airframe A320 FAMILY.

Airline Economics Airline Planning Workshop

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND FLIGHT TEST SOLUTIONS

SUMMARY REPORT ON THE SAFETY OVERSIGHT AUDIT FOLLOW-UP OF THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION OF KUWAIT

European Collaboration. Focus on Avionics. Brussels, 22/06/ ALICIA-presentation event - EC-presentation v0.

Official Journal of the European Union L 186/27

E-RECORDS. Our Innovation journey - a Paperless operation SWARAN SIDHU - HEAD OF FLEET TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT

FACILITATION PANEL (FALP)

Introduction. Airline Economics. Copyright 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Roadmapping Breakout Session Overview

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

Continuous Improvement of the Global Air Traffic Management System

THE FIRST CHOICE FOR FREQUENT TRAVELERS

June 9th, 2011 Runway Excursions at Landing The n 1 Global Air Safety Issue Can We Reduce this Risk Through Innovative Avionics?

Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing ASIAS Overview PA-RAST Meeting March 2016 ASIAS Proprietary Do Not Distribute

Introduction to ROPS. Runway Overrun Prevention System. Presented by: Jerome JOURNADE ROPS Technical Manager

DP-7 The need for QMS controlled processes in AIS/AIM. Presentation to QMS for AIS/MAP Service Implementation Workshop Dakar, Senegal, May 2011

Commercial Aviation Safety Team

WORLD INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION 18/7/14 REPORT ON. Fifteenth Session. the

A350XWB Programme Status

European ATM Development The Big Idea

Global Investor Forum Airbus. Fabrice Brégier Chief Executive Officer Airbus. Page 1

ENVIRONMENT ACTION PLAN

SECTION B AIRWORTHINESS CERTIFICATION

GERMAN EQUITY FORUM 2016

Randy Tinseth Vice President, Marketing

SEAMLESS SKY IN EUROPE. Carlo Maria Borghini Director Administration and Finance Muscat, OMAN October 2009

Flight control checks Flight Control Events

Airports and Airlines Winter Operations Economic Policy Aspects. Narjess Teyssier Chief Economic Analysis & Policy Section

Flight Dynamics Analysis of a Medium Range Box Wing Aircraft

Urban Air Mobility NASA Perspectives

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

Randy Tinseth Vice President, Marketing Boeing Commercial Airplanes July 2010

MRJ and The Future of Regional Jets

Transcription:

EWADE 2007 April 2006 Presented by Dieter SCHMITT Vice-President Research & Technology Future Partnerships for Airbus and Universities SAMARA 2007

What did people think in 1970? Many thought in 2000 we would see: Size will go beyond 1000 seats Propulsion to be either Hydrogen or Nuclear VTOL aircraft will dominate Short and Medium Range Supersonic & Hypersonic For Long Range SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 2

Evolution vs Revolution Air Transport Effectiveness The age of sustainable growth: is it possible? A380? The commercial age Boeing 707 The pioneering age 1900 s 1950 s 2000 s 2050 s SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 3

Future challenges of air transport Further population growth & availability of ressources Projected total conventional oil production, 19 Oil in billion barrels 80 Demand 70 Production 60 New transportation & communication methods 50 40 30 20 10 0 60 10 20 30 40 50 2000 SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 4

European Aeronautics Vision 2020 Challenges Quality and Affordability and associated goals Reduced passenger charges Increased passenger choice Transformed freight operations Reduced time to market by 50% The environment Reduction of CO2 by 50% Reduction of NOx by 80% Reduce perceived external noise by 50%. Safety Reduction of accidents rate by 80% Drastic reduction in human error and its consequences The Efficiency of the Air Transport System Security 3X capacity increase 99% of flights within 15 of schedule Less than 15 in airport before short flights Airborne - zero hazard from hostile action Airport - zero access by unauthorised persons or products Air navigation - No misuse. Safe control of hijacked aircraft addresses the full scope of customer expectations January 2001 SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 5

ACARE and its stakeholders Airbus relevant in ACARE Airlines European member states European Commission National authorities Airports ACARE ATM Research centres Aircraft Industry Universities SME Supply chain SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 6

ACARE and the European Framework Programmes SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 7

Strategic Research Agenda 2 (SRA-2) 5 High level target concepts for Air Transport Systems: $ Ultra cost-efficient Air Transport System Ultra time efficient Ultra green Highly customized Ultrasecure SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 8

How will Airbus implement the vision? Challenges of Vision 2020 Quality and Affordability Lower cost Cabin design Challenges for AIRBUS Low cost manufacturing and assembly Design methods and tools; KBE Flexible, up-gradable cabin The Environment Safety and Security The Efficiency of the Air Transport System Reduce drag Improve systems Reduce weight Improve powerplant Airframe noise Security Safety Capacity Reduce delays Aerodynamic drag reduction Alternative energy More Electric Systems Low weight structures Pylon, engine integration High lift noise Landing gear noise Passive protection means Proactive protection means Systems design Human factors Flight hazard resolution Wake Vortex Communication Navigation Surveillance SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 9 Advanced Aircraft Configuration

Aircraft Design Cycle ~5-10 ~5 20-40 years 25 years Launch EIS Research Development Development Production End of production line In-service / operation Aeronautics has a long term cycle SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 10

Airframe manufacturers network in R&T a Civil transport aircraft Helicopters, Business jets etc Research infrastructure Level 1 Flight Physics Universities Level 2 Level 3 Structures Systems Etc.. Labs Education Competence & skills to support business SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 11 Research Centers

The next big challenges SRA-2 Technology list maintenance fuel Costs fees acquisition costs crew Environment Society needs Taxonomy area Flight Physics Aerostructures Propulsion Human factors Innovative concepts Integrated design Technology Flow control Adaptive winglets Noise shielding through aircraft configuration etc.. New materials Highly automated manufacturing & assembly etc.. Contra-rotating fan engine etc.. Autonomous flight operations etc.. Environmental friendly rotorcraft High aspect ratio / low sweep configuration etc.. System simulation Fault tolerant systems etc.. SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 12

Partnerships: The Concept Airbus R&T Partnerships international initiatives Approach: Operating on a global scale: - European Union, Russia, USA, Australia, India, China. Aligned with Airbus Technology needs Integrated managed partnerships Wide Research Networks РОССИЯ Delivering: Access to technology and expertise Improved focus and effectiveness Access and leverage of resources Direction and focus for our partners Europe and wider SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 13

From Plans to Action What we aim to deliver, by when Targets -5% Wt -10% Wt -20% Wt Product needs and drivers STP STP STP STP STP Key Projects (launched and envisaged) Plan to Deliver Investment requirements ( ) and Risk Assessment Investment Resource Plan Projects Needs STP - Plans Conversion of Plans into Action - the steps Airbus needs and Partner capabilities matching Partner selection for specific technical topics Definition of Work-packages Identification of funding routes Preparation and submission of Proposals Contract negotiations Project Launch SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 14

Partner Involvement in the R&T process Number of subjects Technology Maturity Adapt Validate Programmes Number of subjects Discover Understand Deploy ~ 10% R&T Portfolio ~ 40% R&T Portfolio ~ 50% R&T Portfolio Universities Research Institutes Industry Universities Basic research, generally far from application Research Institutes Applied research, adapting basic research to industrial needs Industrial Companies Validating technologies for specific component applications SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 15

Partner Matching Airbus Needs Requirements Challenges Ideas Capability Inspiration Research Community Technical Workshops Research Community Industry, Institutes, Univs Involved earlier in planning Formation of Partnerships for specific Topics SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 16

Technology as driver for success A300 A310 A320 A330/A340 2 man-cockpit Sidestick controller All new advanced technology wing twin-engine, twin-aisle a/c CFRP vertical fin 1970 A300B2 SAMARA 2007 Second generation digital auto flight system 1980 A310-200 CFRP bulkhead 1990 A320-200 A330-300 A340-300 A380 CFRP centre wing box Variable Frequency generator 2000 A340-600 June 2007 A380 Page 18

Preparing the future: NACRE 1st of April 2005 saw the launch of the 4 year EU FP6 funded research programme NACRE (New Aircraft Concepts Research) under Airbus lead together with 35 European partners. New Aircraft Concepts to foster technological innovation Novel Powerplant Installation: challenging configurations for ambitious goals on environment protection and cost-efficiency SAMARA 2007 Novel Lifting Surfaces and Control for improved structure and aerodynamic efficiency through an integrated approach Novel Fuselage and Cabin to develop passengercentered concepts and cost-efficient technologies June 2007 Page 19

Outline of the Presentation Partnerships The concept Partner Involvement in the R&T process From Plans to Action Partner Matching Process Funding Instruments Contractual Principles: IPR, Publicity Proposal Bidding Process Next Steps SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 20

Funding Instruments Airbus Direct Contracts, 100% or Co-funded 100% Airbus funded, following a bidding process. Co-funded with together with Research Partner(s) and Risk Sharing Industrial Partners European Union Funding Classical instruments such as Framework programmes New Instruments (FP 7, JTI) National and Regional Funding Via local Networks According to local rules and opportunities SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 21

Direct Contracts: Bidding Process Proposals will be requested from selected Partners. Partners will be involved based on the following criteria: Technical Excellence Confidence in Partner Capabilities Project Management ability Facilities, capacity, flexibility Funding and Cost Base Previous Experience Please Note: Confidence between Parties takes time to grow, however, the process will be open to new Partners. SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 22

Contractual Principles: Intellectual Property Project 100% Funded by Airbus Project is Co-Funded by Airbus Airbus owns Foreground IP. Airbus granted rights to Background IP needed to exploit Foreground IP. Airbus will endeavour to provide Foreground IP user rights to its Partners for their own Research purposes. Patents All patenting costs borne by Airbus subject to agreement. Airbus is giving an incentive for each patent filed Foreground IP ownership to be defined by the Parties within the Research Project contract. Rights to Foreground IP and Background IP granted by the Parties for commercial. exploitation taking into account parties contributions and business interests. Patents Any Foreground IP suitable for protection will be drawn to the attention of the Parties and necessary action will be taken. SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 23

Contractual Principles: Publicity, Disclosure Confidentiality When Co-funded: The Parties must not release any information relating to the R&T activity without the prior written consent of the Parties in accordance with the co-funding contractual rules. When 100% funded by Airbus: The Partners must not release any information relating to the R&T activity without the prior written consent of Airbus. Publicity In general, Airbus, wishes to attract good publicity for its innovative activities and standard procedures exist for rapidly checking and approving publicity material that R&T Partners may wish to issue. Of course, there are cases where good ideas must remain confidential. SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 24

Make or Buy Policy Based on R&T criticality defined through Make Time horizon for delivering of results Importance of R&T (technical advantage, as seen by Airbus today) Co-located teams may be mandatory depending on criticality R&T importance SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 25 high med low 5 4 3 4 3 3 2 2 1 short mid long Time Buy

This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of AIRBUS S.A.S.. No intellectual property rights are granted by the delivery of this document or the disclosure of its content. This document shall not be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the consent of AIRBUS S.A.S. This document and its content shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied. The statements made herein do not constitute an offer. They are based on the mentioned assumptions and are expressed in good faith. Where the supporting grounds for these statements are not shown, AIRBUS S.A.S. will be pleased to explain the basis thereof. AIRBUS, its logo, A300, A310, A318, A319, A320, A321, A330, A340, A350, A380, A400M are registered trademarks. SAMARA 2007 June 2007 Page 17