LETTER OF AGREEMENT. between. and

Similar documents
International Civil Aviation Organization COMMON FORMAT LOA BETWEEN ATS UNITS. (Presented by United Arab Emirates) SUMMARY

International Virtual Aviation Organisation. Letter of Agreement. between. and. Effective: 15/05/2017 Edition: 2

International Virtual Aviation Organisation. Letter of Agreement. between. and. Effective: 15/05/2017 Edition: 1

LETTER OF AGREEMENT. Between. and RELATING TO

LETTER OF AGREEMENT. Between

4-1. MID RVSM TF/6 Report on Agenda Item 4

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

Letter of Agreement. between. and

Object: LoA between the Barcelona FIR (LECB) and the Bordeaux FIR (LFBB)

SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR IN-FLIGHT CONTINGENCIES IN OCEANIC AIRSPACE OF SEYCHELLES FIR

ATM REGIONAL CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR.. CTA/UTA/FIR

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for UAE Centre (OMAE)

Letter of Agreement (LOA)

GENERAL OPERATING PROCEDURES FINLAND(GOP)

AIRSPACE STRUCTURE. In aeronautics, airspaces are the portion of the atmosphere controlled by a country above its territory.

Letter of Agreement. between

Any queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR

IFR SEPARATION WITHOUT RADAR

Effective: AUSTRALIAN FORMULA ONE GRAND PRIX, ALBERT PARK, MARCH 2018

LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN BODØ FIR AND MURMANSK FIR

IFR SEPARATION USING RADAR

LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN POLISH VACC AND SWEDEN FIR

Letter of Agreement. between. and. Effective: 01-OCT-2016 / 1610 Edition: 3.0

AERONAUTICAL SERVICES ADVISORY MEMORANDUM (ASAM) Focal Point: Gen

Letter of Agreement. IVAO Switzerland & France Divisions. 1. Purpose. 2. General procedures

ENR 1.7 ALTIMETER SETTING PROCEDURES

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for Arabian Control (OGCC)

A Letter of Agreement Between: Robin Hood Airport Doncaster Sheffield and British Gliding Association

IVAO Flight Operations Department Indonesia (ID) Division Procedures

AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

AIP PORTUGAL ENR NOV-2007

Official Journal of the European Union L 186/27

EASA NPA on SERA Part ENAV Response sheet. GENERAL COMMENTS ON NPA PACKAGE Note: Specific comments are provided after the General Comments

International Civil Aviation Organization. Agenda Item 6: Free Route Airspace Concept implementations within the EUR Region FREE ROUTE AIRSPACE DESIGN

ALTIMETER SETTING PROCEDURES

CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA

LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN NORWAY FIR AND DENMARK FIR

Effective: AUSTRALIAN INTERNATIONAL AIRSHOW AVALON 2019, AVALON AIRPORT 19 FEBRUARY - 5 MARCH 2019, IFR OPERATIONS AVALON AIRPORT

1.2 An Approach Control Unit Shall Provide the following services: c) Alerting Service and assistance to organizations involved in SAR Actions;

International Civil Aviation Organization REVIEW OF STATE CONTINGENCY PLANNING REQUIREMENTS. (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY

FRENCH GUIANA ATM CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR ROCHAMBEAU FIR

THE AREA CONTROL CENTRE (CTR) POSITION

LETTER OF AGREEMENT LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN LONDON SOUTHEND AIRPORT AND STOKE AIRFIELD

CHAPTER 4 AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES

SECTION 4 - APPROACH CONTROL PROCEDURES

LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN NORWAY FIR AND DENMARK FIR

This Bulletin may be updated, as necessary, as progress is made toward the start date for Phase 2b of the NAT DLM.

c) Advisory service to IFR flights operating within advisory airspace.

REPUBLIC OF SEYCHELLES CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICE P.O.BOX 181, VICTORIA SEYCHELLES

LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN DENMARK FIR AND SWEDEN FIR. VATSIM Scandinavia 4 April 2013

VATUSA-VATNZ-VATPAC OCEANIC PARTNERSHIP OAKLAND OCEANIC FSS GENERAL SOP 1 OCT 2012

ERIE ATCT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

UK MOUNTAIN WAVE FESTIVAL - TRA (G) CAIRNGORM GLIDING CLUB

Object: LoA between the Reims FIR (LFEE) and the Geneva FIR (LSAG)

REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN NORWAY FIR AND DENMARK FIR

MODULE 4: SIDs and STARs. Slide <#> of

Airspace Management Operations Manual

AIRSPACE CO-ORDINATION NOTICE Safety and Airspace Regulation Group ACN Reference: Version: Date: Date of Original

CHAPTER 7 AEROPLANE COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT

Safety Brief. 21st March Operations in Somali Airspace

NDS Subject to NOTAM: No

Letter of Agreement. IVAO German & France Divisions. 1. Purpose. 2. General procedures

WP 09 Language proficiency for GA

NATS Swanwick. Interface Agreement. Owners: General Manager LTC Swanwick. General Manager xxxxx Airport

SERA AND CAP694 (THE UK FLIGHT PLANNING GUIDE) - GUIDANCE. Correct to 1 May This document is for guidance only and is subject to change.

AIRCRAFT INCIDENT REPORT

2.2 ANSP Certification, Designation & Cross-Border ANS Provision

LSSIP Year 2011 Cyprus Part III - Chapter 15-1 Released Issue

AIP ENR JORDAN 12 DEC 2013 RADAR SERVICES AND PROCEDURES

Denmark FIR and Sweden FIR

Contents. Subpart A General 91.1 Purpose... 7

LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN NORWAY FIR AND SWEDEN FIR

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION

LETTER OF AGREEMENT. between. The purpose of this Letter of Agreement is to define the coordination procedures to be applied

Letter of Agreement. IVAO United Kingdom and Ireland & France Divisions. 1. Purpose. 2. General procedures

ENR 1.1 GEN. RULES (Insert para 13 in ENR 1.1 of AIP India as follows)

OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)

ATM Contingency Plan for Male FIR, Maldives. (Presented by MALDIVES) SUMMARY

SECTION 6 - SEPARATION STANDARDS

LETTER OF AGREEMENT. 1. General. VACC-AUSTRIA and VACC-CZ Purpose Operational Status Validity. Between

NATS Edinburgh / BGA LOA effective 24 November 2005

INDICE. 1. Purpose 2 2. General procedures 2 3. ATC units description 2 4. Coordination procedures En-route coordination 6

VIRTUAL AIR TRAFFIC SIMULATION NETWORK NORTH AMERICA REGION - USA DIVISION vzkc KANSAS CITY ARTCC

Letter of Agreement. Between Jacksonville ARTCC and Virtual United States Navy Effective Date: Sept 1, 2008

Appendix A COMMUNICATION BEST PRACTICES

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management

L 342/20 Official Journal of the European Union

CAR ATS AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES

Consider problems and make specific recommendations concerning the provision of ATS/AIS/SAR in the Asia Pacific Region LOST COMMUNICATION PROCEDURES

APPENDIX F AIRSPACE INFORMATION

Air Traffic Management

OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)

INDEMNITY APPLICATION FORM

Letter of Agreement between the UHPC and NATS

Chapter 6. Brize Radar, Speedbird 213 Heavy, request radar advisory. Speedbird 123 change call sign to BA 123

LETTER OF AGREEMENT. between. and

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

RELEASE RECORD. Version Date Author Notes Dec 2006 SK Initial Release

Transcription:

LETTER OF AGREEMENT between and Effective: 15 th June 2017 Version: 0.1 1 General 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this Letter of Agreement (LoA) is to define the co-ordination procedures to be applied between Beirut Area Control Center (ACC) and when providing Air Traffic Service (ATS) to General (IFR/VFR) and/or Commercial Air Traffic. These procedures are supplementary to those specified in IVAO Regulations, and ATS providers. 1.2 Operational Status Both ATS units shall keep each other advised of any changes in the operational status of their facilities and navigational aids which may affect the procedures specified in this LoA. 2 Areas of Responsibility for the Provision of ATS 2.1 Areas of Responsibility The lateral and vertical limits of the respective areas of responsibility are as follows: Note: See paragraph 2.1.1 / 2.1.2. 2.1.1 Beirut ACC Lateral limits: 34 38 00 N 035 57 00 E then along the Lebanon/Syria borders, as well as Lebanon/Palestine borders to 33 06 00 N 034 53 00 E joining and following at 12 NM from seashore line semi-arc at a radius of 45 NM centered on 33 4827N 0352910E and ending 34 33 10 N 035 35 48 E 34 38 00 N 035 43 00 E then back to the starting point. Vertical limits: SFC FL460 ATC Operations XM Division For Flight Simulator/IVAO use only LoA between Lebanon and Syria 1

ICAO airspace classification for the area of responsibility of Beirut ACC along the common boundary of the areas of responsibility of Beirut ACC and, is described in Annex B to this LoA. 2.1.2 Lateral limits: Alongside the Syrian/Lebanese borders along the Syrian borders to the borders of Turkey. Then extending 10nm from the coastline and continues at 10nm from coastline until the Lebanese borders. Vertical limits: SFC - UNL ICAO airspace classification for the area of responsibility of Beirut ACC along the common boundary of the areas of responsibility of Beirut ACC and, is described in Annex B to this LoA. 3 Procedures 3.1 The procedures to be applied by Beirut ACC and are detailed in the Annexes to this Letter of Agreement: Annex A: Definitions and Abbreviations Annex B: Area of Common Interest Annex C: Procedures for Co-ordination Annex D: Transfer of Control and Transfer of Communications 3.2 These procedures shall be promulgated to the operational staff of the ATS units concerned. 4 Revisions and Deviations 4.1 Revision of the Letter of Agreement The revision of the current LoA, excluding Annexes and their Appendices, requires the mutual written consent of the XM-AOC or XM-AOAC. 4.2 Revision of the Annexes to the Letter of Agreement The revision of Annexes to the present LoA requires the mutual written consent of the XM-AOC or XM-AOAC. 4.3 Temporary Deviations When necessary, concerned members opening the adequate ATC position may introduce, by mutual agreement and for a specified time period, temporary modifications to the procedures laid down in the Annexes to the present LoA. 4.4 Incidental Deviations Instances may arise where incidental deviations from the procedures specified in the Annexes to this Letter of Agreement may become necessary. Under these circumstances air traffic controllers are expected to exercise their best judgment to ensure the safety and efficiency of air traffic. ATC Operations XM Division For Flight Simulator/IVAO use only LoA between Lebanon and Syria 2

5 Cancellation 5.1 Cancellation of the present LoA by mutual agreement of the respective approving Authorities may take place at any time. 5.2 Cancellation of this LoA by either Approving Division is possible at any time, provided that the cancelling party declares its intention to cancel the LoA with a minimum pre-notification time of 30 Days before the date the cancellation is to take effect. 6 Interpretation and Settlement of Disputes 6.1 Should any doubt or diverging views arise regarding the interpretation of any provision of the present Letter of Agreement, or in case of dispute regarding its application, the parties shall endeavour to reach a solution acceptable to both of them. 6.2 Should no agreement be reached, each of the parties shall refer to a higher level of its National Aviation Administration, to which the dispute shall be submitted for settlement. 7 Validity This Letter of Agreement becomes effective between Lebanon and Syria on the 15 th of JUNE 2017 13 th of June 2017 13 th of June 2017 George Hamaty OLBB Chief Galeb Abou Hala OSTT Chief ATC Operations XM Division For Flight Simulator/IVAO use only LoA between Lebanon and Syria 3

Annex A. Definitions and Abbreviations. Effective: 15 th of June 2017 Revised: 13 th of June 2017 A.1 Definitions A.1.1 ATS Area of Responsibility An airspace of defined dimensions where a sole ATS unit has responsibility for providing air traffic services. A.1.2 Area of Common Interest A volume of airspace as agreed between 2 ATS Units, extending into the adjacent/subjacent Areas of Responsibility, within which airspace structure and related activities may have an impact on air traffic co-ordination procedures. A.1.3 Division Level (DL) The level dividing two super-imposed areas of responsibility for the provision of ATS. A.1.4 General Air Traffic (GAT). All flights which are conducted in accordance with the rules and procedures of ICAO and/or the national civil aviation regulations and legislation. A.1.5 Operational Air Traffic (OAT) All flights which do not comply with the provisions stated for GAT and for which rules and procedures have been specified by appropriate national authorities. A.1.6 Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) A vertical separation minimum of 300 m (1 000 ft) which is applied between FL 290 and FL 410 inclusive, on the basis of regional air navigation agreements and in accordance with conditions specified therein. A.1.6.1 RVSM Approved Aircraft Aircraft that have received State approval for RVSM operations within the XM RVSM airspace. A.1.6.2 RVSM Entry Point The first reporting point over which an aircraft passes or is expected to pass immediately before, upon, or immediately after initial entry into XM RVSM airspace, normally the first reference point for applying a 300 m (1 000 ft) vertical separation minimum between RVSM approved aircraft. ATC Operations XM Division For Flight Simulator/IVAO use only LoA between Lebanon and Syria 4

A.1.6.3 RVSM Exit Point The last reporting point over which an aircraft passes or is expected to pass immediately before, upon, or immediately after leaving XM RVSM airspace, normally the last reference point for applying a 300 m (1 000 ft) vertical separation minimum between RVSM approved aircraft. A.1.7 A.1.7.1 Release Release for Climb An authorization for the accepting unit to climb (a) specific aircraft before the transfer of control. Note: The transferring Unit/Sector remains responsible within its Area of Responsibility for separation between the transferred aircraft and other aircraft unknown to the accepting unit/sector, unless otherwise agreed. A.1.7.2 Release for Descent An authorization for the accepting unit to descend (a) specific aircraft before the transfer of control. Note: The transferring Unit/Sector remains responsible within its Area of Responsibility for separation between the transferred aircraft and other aircraft unknown to the accepting unit/sector, unless otherwise agreed. A.1.7.3 Release for Turn An authorization for the accepting unit to turn (a) specific aircraft away from the current flight path by not more than 45 o before the transfer of control. Note: The transferring Unit/Sector remains responsible within its Area of Responsibility for separation between the transferred aircraft and other aircraft unknown to the accepting unit/sector, unless otherwise agreed. ATC Operations XM Division For Flight Simulator/IVAO use only LoA between Lebanon and Syria 5

A.2 Abbreviations ABI ACI* ACT AIP AMC* Advance Boundary Information Area of Common Interest Activation Message Aeronautical Information Publication Airspace Management Cell LAM Logical Acknowledge (Message Type Designator) LoA* LOF* MAC* Letter of Agreement Logon Forward Message (OLDI) Message for Abrogation of Coordination (OLDI) AoR* ATC ATS Area of Responsibility Air Traffic Control Air Traffic Services MFC* NAN* Multi Frequency Coding (telephone system) Next Authority Notified Message (OLDI) ATSP* Air Traffic Services Provider NM Nautical Mile CBA* Cross Border Area OAT* Operational Air Traffic CDR* Conditional Route OLDI On-line Data Interchange COP* Coordination Point CPDLC Controller-Pilot Data Link Communications ORCAM Originating Region Code Assignment Method PAC* Pre-activation Message (OLDI) DL* Division Level REV* Revision Message ETO Estimated Time Over Significant Point RTF Radio Telephony FDPS FIC FIR FMP* GAT* ICAO Flight Data Processing System Flight Information Centre Flight Information Region Flow Management Position General Air Traffic International Civil Aviation Organization RVSM SSR TSA* UIR VFR Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum Secondary Surveillance Radar Temporary Segregated Airspace Upper Flight Information Region Visual Flight Rules IFR Instrument Flight Rules Note: Abbreviations marked with an * are non-icao abbreviations. ATC Operations XM Division For Flight Simulator/IVAO use only LoA between Lebanon and Syria 6

Annex B Area of Common Interest Effective: 15 th of June 2017 Revised: 13 th of June 2017 B.1 Airspace Structure and Classification within the Area of Common Interest B.1.1 Beirut FIR COP Route in Beirut FIR/UIR Vertical Limits Airspace Classification LEBOR UR655 FL195 FL460 Class A LATEB UN310 UP300 FL195 FL460 FL195 FL460 Class A B.1.2 Damascus FIR COP LEBOR Route in Damascus FIR/UIR R655 L513 Vertical Limits FL250 UNL FL240 UNL Airspace Classification Class A Class A LATEB J222 FL290 UNL Class A B.2 Sectorization The sectorization within the ACI is shown in Appendix 1 of Annex B. ATC Operations XM Division For Flight Simulator/IVAO use only LoA between Lebanon and Syria 7

Appendix 1 of Annex B Sectorization within Beirut ACC & ATC Operations XM Division For Flight Simulator/IVAO use only LoA between Lebanon and Syria 8

Annex C¹ Procedures for Co-ordination Effective: 15 th of June 2017 Revised: 13 th of June 2017 C.1 General Conditions for Acceptance of Flights C.1.1 C.1.2 C.1.3 C.1.4 C.1.5 Co-ordination of flights shall take place by reference to the coordination point (COP) and in accordance with the appropriate levels specified for the relevant route (see paragraph C.2). Flights shall be considered to be maintaining the co-ordinated level at the transfer of control point unless climb or descent conditions have been clearly stated by verbal/text co-ordination, except if otherwise described in paragraph C.2. If the accepting ATS unit cannot accept a flight offered in accordance with the conditions specified above, it shall clearly indicate its inability and specify the conditions under which the flight will be accepted. For any proposed deviation from the conditions specified in this Annex (e.g. COP, route or level) the transferring Unit shall initiate an Approval Request. The accepting ATS unit shall not notify the transferring ATS unit that it has established ground-air communications with the transferred aircraft unless specifically requested to do so. The Accepting Unit shall notify the transferring Unit in the event that communication with the aircraft is not established as expected. C.2 ATS-Routes, Co-ordination Points and Level Allocation Available ATS-routes, COPs to be used and level allocation to be applied, are described in the tables below. C.2.1 Flights from Beirut ACC to ATS-Route COP Level Allocation Special Conditions UR655 LEBOR ODD - At or above FL 240 for departures from Beirut* - Not below FL 240 for arrivals to OSDI UN310 LATEB ODD - At or above FL 290 for UP300 ODD departures from Beirut* * Secondary airports in Beirut FIR such as; Kleyate (OLKA) or Rayak AB (OLRA) follow the same restrictions C.2.2 Flights From to Beirut ACC ATS-Route COP Level Allocation Special Conditions R655 LEBOR EVEN - At or above FL240 for departures from OSDI -Not below FL 240 for arrivals to Beirut* L513 EVEN - At or above FL240 for departures from OSDI -Not below FL 240 for arrivals to Beirut* * Secondary airports in Beirut FIR such as; Kleyate (OLKA) or Rayak AB (OLRA) follow the same restrictions ATC Operations XM Division For Flight Simulator/IVAO use only LoA between Lebanon and Syria 9

C.3 VFR Flights Exchange of flight data on VFR flights between Beirut ACC and shall be conducted verbally or by text and should include the following: - Call-Sign - VFR - Type of Aircraft - Departure and Destination Aerodrome - CFL - ETO COP or FIR boundary - SSR Code C.3.1 C.3.2 C.3.3 VFR flights are not permitted in the AoR of Beirut ACC and above FL195. VFR flights operating within controlled airspace should, in so far as practical, be coordinated in accordance with the established COPs specified in para. C.2.1 and C2.2. Coordination of known VFR traffic operating outside controlled airspace should be conducted by exchanging the ETO Beirut / Damascus FIR boundary and the established time of arrival at destination. C.4 Verbal/Text Co-ordination Reminder: IVAO R&R 5.3.6 - Handoffs of aircraft between controllers should be done using the transfer feature in the controlling software. Transfers may first be coordinated via private chat or using the IVAO Intercom. Active Members on duties at any of the ATC positions (OLBB_CTR or OSTT_CTR) have two ways to co-ordinate their traffic for the next accepting unit C.4.1 C.4.2 Verbal co-ordination: INTERCOM Voice communication through Skype tm &/or TS3 with Air Traffic Controllers is now made a lot easier with this new web based tool: the IVAO Intercom. The main goal of the INTECOM is to simplify and facilitate the traffic flow coordination between the adjacent and nearby controllers by having a Voice Intercommunication System, with multiple frequencies. Text co-ordination: COMMBox Private Chat Use the private chat text screens in your ATC client program (IVAC/IVAC2). The content of the co-ordination message shall consider the following data: - Call-sign - CFL - ETO COP or FIR boundary - SSR code C.5 Direct Course C.5.1 Deviation off-route an approved flight plan for a direct waypoint, should be coordinated in accordance with any approved method as outlined in C.4 with the active sector subject to the flow of traffic. Approval will granted accordingly. ATC Operations XM Division For Flight Simulator/IVAO use only LoA between Lebanon and Syria 10

Annex D Transfer of Control and Transfer of Communications HANDOFF Effective: 15 th of June 2017 Revised: 13 th of June 2017 D.1 Transfer of Control The transfer of control takes place at the COPs on the AoR-boundary. D.2 Transfer of Communications The transfer of communications shall take place not later than not later than the transfer of control, unless otherwise coordinated. When Controller-Pilot Data Link Communications (CPDLC) is used in both ATS units, the transfer of CPDLC shall commence concurrently with the transfer of voice communications. D.2.1 Frequencies from Beirut ACC to For Traffic Via: LEBOR LATEB Primary Frequency: 121.300 MHz Sector D.2.2 Frequencies from to Beirut ACC For Traffic Via: LEBOR Primary Frequency: 119.300 MHz Beirut ACC Sector ATC Operations XM Division For Flight Simulator/IVAO use only LoA between Lebanon and Syria 11