Airport Compatibility

Similar documents
Airport Compatibility Brochure 737 MAX

Airport Compatibility Brochure 737 MAX. March 2014 PRELIMINARY

Boeing Airplane Overview

ATR-600 SERIES THE LEADING TURBOPROP

Airbus A320family FOPP Air Flow Deflector

The offers operators increased capacity while taking advantage of existing airport infrastructure. aero quarterly qtr_03 10

Boeing Product Update

Think the solution, experience the change

A380: Designed for Airports

ATR THE SHORTCUT TO YOUR DESTINATION

Lithium Battery as Cargo

Morgan Stanley Commercial update. Morgan Stanley. Airbus Commercial Update. Mark Pearman Wright Head of Corporate & Investor Marketing

Boeing Aircraft and the Impact on Airports

Athens International Airport, Marketing Workshop. The Challenges facing Air Transport. John Blanchfield Director, Technical Marketing, Airbus

Program Update Dan Cohen-Nir - Airbus Americas

MRO Trends: Airbus update

Airport/Aircraft Compatibility Challenges on the Apron

Fuel and Flight Efficiency Services by Airbus

ACI-NA Operations & Technical Affairs Committee March 5, 2013 St Petersburg, Florida

Beijing, 18 h of September 2014 Pierre BACHELIER Head of ATM Programme. Cockpit Initiatives. ATC Global 2014

Airport Compatibility

Operational Interruption Cost Assessment Methodology

ITA Europe 2015 Keynote Speaker

Airbus Commercial Update

CEE 5614 and CEE Aircraft Classifications. Spring 2013

Towards the Future ATM

Air Transport Forecast & Scenarios Key drivers for Scenario building. EFONET Workshop The Hague November 21st 2008

Maintenance Cost Estimation Method of an Aircraft Manufacturer

CEE Quick Overview of Aircraft Classifications. January 2018

Airfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Stall. Review of the Fundamentals, the Procedure and the Training. Presented by Capt. Christian Norden/ Flight Crew Development

International Industry Working Group Fifth Edition R1, 2007

Airfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni

NAVBLUE: Reach for the skies

Designing for ease of future maintenance

Available On-Board Technologies For Runway Excursions Prevention

Bearing Strength Assessment PLR & PCN

Go-Around Procedure. Flight Instructor Seminar / Miami, May 24 th and 25 th, 2011

Transformation in Procurement. Challenges for the Global Aircraft Industry. HAL Executives Presentation Toulouse, October 13, 2014

Technical Press Briefing

What did people think in 1970?

FOR. Boeing Commercial Airplanes

ATSAW. (Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness) Presented by Laurent VIDAL - Surveillance systems manager Support to sales & programs

Update on the Aspen/Pitkin County Airport Improvements

AP/FD TCAS and TCAP. Airborne Conflict Safety Forum Harry Nelson. A reminder and update. Month 20XX

Manufacturer s Perspective- Airport Pavement Needs and Maintenance Issues

Introduction to ROPS. Runway Overrun Prevention System. Presented by: Jerome JOURNADE ROPS Technical Manager

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

June 9th, 2011 Runway Excursions at Landing The n 1 Global Air Safety Issue Can We Reduce this Risk Through Innovative Avionics?

Colombian PBN implementation: El Dorado case study

MRJ and The Future of Regional Jets

Inadvertent Slide Deployments Update

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport

ATR FREIGHTER VERSIONS. AN EASY CONVERSION AVAILABLE SINCE 2002, TO EXTEND ATR s

Africa, Airbus; A vision of the future

Assignment 3: Runway Length and EMAS Design. Aircraft Engine Remarks. CFM56-7B20/-7B22/-7B24 developing 20,000 lb of thrust at sea level

717 Aeroplane JAA Data Sheet

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

Services by Airbus Training. A350XWB Reaching new horizons together

Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016

AIRBUS FLY-BY-WIRE A TOTAL APPROACH TO DEPENDABILITY

Airport Master Plan. Brookings Regional Airport. Runway Runway 17-35

Analysis of Air Transportation Systems. The Aircraft and the System

Airplane Performance. Introduction. Copyright 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Nanocomposites for Future Airbus Airframes

The Boeing Next-Generation 737 Family Productive, Progressive, Flexible, Familiar

737 MAX Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning

737 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning

/300 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

Aircraft Technology. Impact on Airport Capacity. Bob Kelley-Wickemeyer. Chief Engineer Boeing Enabling Technology & Research

Advisory Circular (AC)

Special Modification To Standards Process for Airplane Design Group VI. The Boeing Federal Aviation Administration

Reserved for high flyers

OLM FBW 2006 Toulouse September Head Up Display

Draft Proposal for the Amendment of the Sub-Cap on Off-Peak Landing & Take Off Charges at Dublin Airport. Addendum to Commission Paper CP4/2003

Demand Patterns; Geometric Design of Airfield Prof. Amedeo Odoni

New generation aircraft in the instrument approach domain. Jean-Christophe Lair Airbus Test pilot 1 st Feb. 2017

Aircraft Classifications. Dr. Antonio Trani and Julio Roa Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

TABLE OF CONTENTS. General Study Objectives Public Involvement Issues to Be Resolved

Flight control checks Flight Control Events

Tires Versus Pavement: Pilots, mechanics, and airport managers on the same page

DRAFT FINAL REPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN. Rifle Garfield County Airport Revised May 15, 2014

AIRBUS VIEW ON STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS TO COMPOSITE COMPONNENT

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

A320 FAMILY: The most successful aircraft family. Key Figures* 20% fuel burn reduction. 5% lower airframe A320 FAMILY.

Meeting Summary ABE Master Plan Project Advisory Group (PAG) Meeting #3 August 15, Shannon Eibert, C&S Companies

2003 Beechcraft Premier I SN RB-74

The Aircraft Classification Rating Pavement Classification Rating ACR-PCR

777-9 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning

The Giant Jetliner A380

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

del Airbus en el mundo de la

Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

John Leahy Chief Operating Officer, Customers Airbus Annual Press Conference

Transcription:

Presented by Dan COHEN-NIR Programs Director Airbus Americas Holdings Inc. www.airbusamericas.com Airport Compatibility Opportunities and Challenges

Airport Challenges & Aircraft Design Challenge: Prepare airport infrastructure for wave of replacement of Boeing 767-200/300/400, 777-200/300, Airbus A310-200/300, A340-200/300 by 787-8/9 and A350-800/900/1000 aircraft Risk of significant shortage of full-width and full-length ADG-V gates Challenge: Prepare airport infrastructure for upcoming replacement of DC-9, MD-80 and early 737 models by A320 and 737 NG (most equipped with blended winglets) Risk of significant shortage of ADG-III gates Challenge: Prepare airport infrastructure for the ADG-VI aircraft (A380/747-8) Challenge: Catch-up airport infrastructure for the early generation 747-400 replacements (A340-600 and 777-300ER) in terms of pavement strengthening and taxiway fillet widening

Aircraft Wing Span Evolution SOURCE: Adapted from IIWG Commercial Aircraft Design Characteristics Trends and growth projections, 2007 A350-900 A350-800 A350-1000

Narrow-Body Aircraft Airport Challenge: Prepare airport infrastructure for upcoming replacement of DC- 9, MD-80 and early 737 models by A320 and 737 NG (most equipped with blended winglets) Terminal/apron Airfield Risk of significant shortage of full-width DG-III/Code C gates

Narrow-body Family Looking Ahead Several studies under way at Airbus Short-term improvements Long-term improvements Require a STEP-CHANGE in engine performance (fuel burn, emissions and noise) Either provided by current technology New technology (gear turbo fan, open rotor, else?) May or may not lead to a change in the aircraft footprint

New Wide-Body / Long-Range Aircraft Airport Challenge: Prepare airport infrastructure for wave of replacement of Boeing 767-200/300/400, 777-200/300, Airbus A310-200/300, A340-200/300 by 787-8/9 and A350-800/900/1000 aircraft Terminal/apron Airfield Runway, taxiway system, separations, pavement strength, tire pressure Risk of operational restrictions and shortage of full-width and full-length ADG-V gates

Aircraft Wing Span (R)Evolution SOURCE: Adapted from IIWG Commercial Aircraft Design Characteristics Trends and growth projections, 2007 A350-900 A350-800 A350-1000 Design for higher fuel efficiency drives the next generation aircraft wingspan closer to the DG-V upper limit Review of the airfield compliance and readiness may be required for aircraft operations replacing those of older generation DG-V and DG-IV aircraft

More span but less weight for the same mission SOURCE: Adapted from IIWG Commercial Aircraft Design Characteristics Trends and growth projections, 2007 A350-900 A350-800 A350-1000

Focus on A350 XWB Airport Compatibility

Airport Categories and Indices A350-800 A330-200 A350-900 A340-300 A350-1000 A340-600 Wingspan (ft/m) 212.52/64.75 197.8/60.3 212.52/64.75 197.8/60.3 212.52/64.75 208.2/63.5 ICAO Code letter E E E E E E FAA Design Group V V V V V V Overall Length (ft/m) 198.5/60.5 191.5/58.4 219.5/66.9 208.95/63.7 242.5/73.9 247.2/75.4 RFF Category (ICAO) ARFF Index (FAA) 8 D 8 D 9 E 8 D 9 E 9 E

Dimensions of the A350-900 64.75 m (212 ft 5.2 in) 19.29 m (63 ft 2.6 in) 66.61 m (218 ft 6.5 in) 17.05 m (55 ft 11 in) 66.89 m (219 ft 5.5 in)

Dimensions of the A350-800 60.54 m (198 ft 7.5 in) 64.75 m (212 ft 5.2 in) 19.27 19.29 m (63 ft 2.6 in) 60.26 m (197 ft 8.4 in) 17.05 m (55 ft 11 in)

Dimensions of the A350-1000 64.75 m (212 ft 5.2 in) 73.88 m (242 ft 4.7 in) 19.29 19.27 m (63 m (63 ft 2.6 ft 2.6 in) in) 73.59m (241 ft 5.2 in) 17.05 m (55 ft 11 in)

Aircraft Design Weights Model Maximum Taxi Weight (MTW) Maximum Take- Off Weight (MTOW) Maximum Landing Weight (MLW) Maximum Zero Fuel Weight (MZFW) A350-800 248 900 kg 248 000 kg 185 000 kg 173 500 kg A350-900 268 900 kg 268 000 kg 205 000 kg 192 000 kg A350-1000 298 900 kg 298 000 kg 228 500 kg 213 500 kg A330-300 233 900 kg 233 000 kg 187 000 kg 175 000 kg A340-300 275 900 kg 275 000 kg 192 000 kg 180 000 kg

Aircraft Landing Gear Dimensions wheel track wheel base wheel track wheel base A350-800 A330-200 A330-300 777-200/200LR 12.5m 12.6m 12.6m 12.9m 24.9m 22.2m 25.4m 25.9m A350-900 MD-11 A340-300 A340-500 A350-1000 777-300/-300ER A340-600 12.8m 12.6m 12.6m 12.6m 12.9m 12.9m 12.6m 28.7m 24.6m 25.4m 28.0m 33.1m 31.2m 33.3m

Minimum Turning Width A350-800/A350-900 A350-800 A330-200 A330-300 777-200/200LR Minimum Turning Width 46.1m 44.2m 47.5m 48m A350-900 MD-11 A340-300 A340-500 51.1m 49m 49.5m 50.5m

Rigid Pavement ACN

Flexible Pavement ACN

Tire Pressure 17.0 16.0 15.0 14.0 13.0 12.4 12.5 12.0 11.7 11.7 11.9 11.0 16.1 15.7 15.2 14.1 14.4 15.0 16.1 15.2 15.2 16.6 Code Tire Pressure Category W High (No limit) X Medium 15 bar (217 psi) ) Y Low 10 bar (145 psi) Z Very low 5 bar (73 psi) Code Evaluation Method T Technical U Using aircraft 747-8 (26,200) A350-900 Prelim(31,300) 787-8 (25,200) 777-300ER (27,200) A340-600 (27,400) 747-400ER (24,200) A380-800 (26,700) A380-800F (28,100) Aircraft (SWL-kg) 727-200 (19,300) 737-300 (13,700) 767-300ER (21,600) A300-C4 (19,300) 777-200 (19,300) 737-700 (16,100) A320-200 (18,000)

AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of AIRBUS S.A.S.. No intellectual property rights are granted by the delivery of this document or the disclosure of its content. This document shall not be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the express written consent of AIRBUS S.A.S. This document and its content shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied. The statements made herein do not constitute an offer. They are based on the mentioned assumptions and are expressed in good faith. Where the supporting grounds for these statements are not shown, AIRBUS S.A.S. will be pleased to explain the basis thereof. AIRBUS, its logo, A300, A310, A318, A319, A320, A321, A330, A340, A350, A380, A400M are registered trademarks.