U.S. Coast Guard - American Waterways Operators Annual Safety Report

Similar documents
U.S. Coast Guard - American Waterways Operators Safety Report National Quality Steering Committee

U.S. Coast Guard - American Waterways Operators Annual Safety Report

European Maritime Safety Agency MARINE CASUALTIES AND INCIDENTS

Section 3.8: Casualty Data Survey. TERMPOL Surveys and Studies

Consideration of Risk Level in Terms of Damage Stability of Old Ship

Maritime Administration of Latvia Division for Investigation of Marine Accidents Summary of Marine accidents and incidents in 2010

Coastal vessels The number of insurance accidents and accident rate fluctuation 8.0%

MARITIME AND PORT AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE SHIPPING CIRCULAR NO. 3 OF 2014

European Maritime Safety Agency ANNUAL OVERVIEW OF MARINE CASUALTIES AND INCIDENTS 2018

The Impact of Maintenance on Passenger Airline Safety

REPORT OF THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE GROUNDING OF THE M.F.V. "ELSINOR" AT FOILNABOE, IRELAND ON THE 15TH SEPTEMBER, 2001.

National Transportation Safety Board

ALASKA RRT. Arctic & Western Alaska Area Committee Brief March 5, 2019

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

VALUE OF TOURISM. Trends from

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Rates of reportable accidents were highest

State of the Waterway 2017

The Polar Code and the Canadian Arctic

Summary. Kvaerner s Investigation Report. Fatal accident at Stord, Norway 7 March / 5

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

2nd Quarter. AEDC is pleased to present the Anchorage Quarterly Economic Indicators Report for the second quarter of 2010.

REPORT OF ~HE COMMITTEE ON BARGE TRANSPORTATION OF THE NATIONAL PETROLEUM COUNCIL JULy 1, 1947

The Economic Contribution of Cruise Tourism to the Southeast Asia Region in Prepared for: CLIA SE Asia. September 2015

CORPS OF ENGINEERS ALASKA DISTRICT Dredging Projects. Michael Tencza, PE Operations Project Manager November 4, 2015

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. hospitality compensation as a share of total compensation at. Page 1

MV ESTONIA Accident Summary

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

CRITICAL REVIEW OF AFRAMAX TANKERS INCIDENTS

From the point of view of air safety, 2015 was yet another good year.

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

3. Aviation Activity Forecasts

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

PRESS RELEASE WRECK REMOVAL OPERATION OF M/V GOODFAITH, ANDROS ISL. GREECE

The world merchant fleet in Statistics from Equasis

Aviation Trends Quarter

Analysis on Maritime Transport Safety in the ESCAP Region

Aviation Industry Safety Update

Monthly Australian road deaths last five years, with trend. 60 Jan 08 Jan 09 Jan 10 Jan 11 Jan 12 Jan 13

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Appendix B. Comparative Risk Assessment Form

U.S. FOREST SERVICE AVIATION SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

MinEx Health and Safety Statistics Q April to June

Sunken Barge ARTHUR J & Tug MADISON Case Study. LCDR Chico Knight, DBA, M.S.

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas

CPP failure caused heavy contact with lock

Japanese Potentially Polluting Wrecks in the Pacific Ocean

Interim Investigation Report pertaining to the investigation report No. 402/15. Very Serious Marine Casualty

2012 Transits. of UNIMAK PASS. Brief to the Aleutian Islands Risk Assessment Advisory Panel and Management Team. September 2014 version 1

Time-series methodologies Market share methodologies Socioeconomic methodologies

The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report

Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment Ed Page Executive Director Marine Exchange of Alaska

To the Members May Alaska Alternative Planning Criteria (APC)

Trends of Maritime Safety and Relevant Issues in the Region

Panama Canal Stakeholder Working Group Meeting

Interim Investigation Report pertaining to the investigation report No. 268/15. Very Serious Marine Casualty

Homeport 2.0 User Guide for Public Users

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

PASSENGER SHIP SAFETY. Damage stability of cruise passenger ships: Monitoring and assessing risk from operation of watertight doors

Transportation Safety and the Allocation of Safety Improvements

DRY- DOCK HULL INSPECTION OF NILE CRUISERS

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA MARINE ACCIDENTS AND INCIDENTS INVESTIGATION MANAGER

CASUALTY-RELATED MATTERS 1 REPORTS ON MARINE CASUALTIES AND INCIDENTS

Report on shipping accidents in the Baltic Sea area during Introduction

Compustat. Data Navigator. White Paper: Airline Industry-Specifi c

REPORT INTO THE FIRE AND SUBSEQUENT GROUNDING OF THE MV "PATRIARCH" ON 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2004

Instrument Ground School IFR Decision Making

Louisiana BUILDING STRONG

Casualty Incident Report

Terminal Symposium February Houston Traffic

Route Causes. The largest percentage of European helicopter. For helicopters, the journey not the destination holds the greatest risk.

U.S. Air Carrier Operations Calendar Year 1999

The Risk Management of Vessel Traffic

State Five Year Tonnage Trend. Shipping Tons Receving Tons Within Tons Total Tons

CRUISE TOURISM S CONTRIBUTION TO THE NEW ZEALAND ECONOMY 2017

US COAST GUARD Hurricane Season LCDR Deon Scott Chief, Planning Division USCG Sector Houston-Galveston

State of the Waterway 2017

2016 was yet another good year for air safety.

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas Analysis

Corroded pipe causing oil spill

Table of Contents. How to interpret data within this report. How to Interpret Data 2. Executive Summary 4. Aviation Safety Accomplishments 5

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Economic Contribution of Tourism to NSW

IBAC Technical Report Summary. Meeting: APANPIRG 14, Bangkok, August 4 through August 7, 2003.

SooYeob, Kim. Director Maritime Safety Department Korea Maritime Institute. 2 September Bangkok

Canadian Aviation Safety Seminar 2006

Wyoming Travel Impacts

Commonwealth of Dominica. Office of the Maritime Administrator

Report on shipping accidents in the Baltic Sea area during 2010

KLHQ Fairfield County Emergency Response Plan (August 13, 2012)

Slovenia. ECOTEC Exhaustive analysis of employment trends in all sectors related to sea or using sea resources

Serving the Tampa Bay Maritime Community Since Celebrating over 125 Years of Service

Wyoming Travel Impacts

CAPTAIN NICHOLAS J. LEWIS Marine Expert

Ohio Freight Conference Great Lakes Commercial Navigation

Yukon Tourism Indicators Year-End Report Yukon Tourism Indicators Year-End Report 2015

Transcription:

American Waterways Operators U.S. Coast Guard - American Waterways Operators Annual Safety Report National Quality Steering Committee Meeting August 3, 216 Established Safety Metrics For 16 years, the National Quality Steering Committee has used three measures to track overall trends in safety and environmental protection. While not all-encompassing, the measures are considered to be useful indicators of towing industry trends. The measures are: Crew fatalities per 1, towing industry workers. Gallons of oil spilled from tank barges per million gallons transported. The number of vessel casualties (overall or by incident severity). This report contains towing industry data and measures for calendar years 1994 to 215. This report also includes summary statistics on crew member injuries, which the National Quality Steering Committee began tracking in 26, for calendar years 26 to 215.

Crew Fatalities In 215, there were six crew fatalities 1. There were a total of ten towing vessel deaths reported to the Coast Guard, but only six were directly related to towing vessel operations. The other four deaths were attributed to existing medical conditions (2) and natural causes (2). Of the six crew fatalities, three were the result of crew members falling into the water. One crew member fell from a barge while securing into a fleeting area, one crew member fell while embarking a towing vessel, and one crew member fell while disembarking a towing vessel. There were two casualties where the towing vessel capsized and resulted in a single fatality in each instance. There was one casualty where the crew abandoned the vessel before it sank, and the master died from exposure. Chart 1 shows the annual fatality count, the linear trend line and the 5-year moving average for calendar years 1994 through 215. Chart 1 - Crew Fatalities by Calendar Year 35 3 25 Fatalities 2 15 29 1 5 16 13 22 19 18 1 13 14 8 9 18 14 7 7 11 7 9 6 7 4 6 1 The death of a crew member serving onboard a towing vessel or barge is considered a crew fatality. Missing crew members are also recorded as crew fatalities. Deaths due to existing medical conditions, natural causes, and deaths of external parties, shipyard workers or shore-side workers are excluded from this measure. - 2 -

Chart 2 shows the distribution of crew fatalities by accident type. The largest number of crew fatalities is attributed to falls overboard (75 of 15, 5%). The next largest group of fatalities is attributed to asphyxiation (23 of 15, 15%). Chart 2 - Crew Fatalities by Accident Type (CY 2 215) 8 7 75 6 5 4 3 2 1 23 11 9 9 8 8 Total = 15 2 2 2 1 Chart 3 shows the number of fatalities resulting from falls overboard for calendar years 21 to 215. While the annual number of fatalities for all accident types has steadily decreased, the number of fatalities due to falls overboard has remained constant. Chart 3 - Crew Fatalities due to Falls Overboard 5 4 3 2 3 3 2 4 3 3 1 21 211 212 213 214 215-3 -

Crew Fatality Rate The crew fatality rate for 214 was four, and the projected crew fatality rate for 215 is seven. Chart 4 shows the crew fatality rate from 1994 to 215. The crew fatality rate is calculated using the Mercer Model, which was developed with AWO-funded research. The denominator for this rate is derived from the number of towing vessels in operation, as reported by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE). The most recent data available is for calendar year 214. As such, the depicted 215 rate is a projection based on the 214 ACOE data. 4 35 Chart 4 - Crew Fatality Rate per 1, FTE 2 34 3 27 25 2 15 1 18 16 23 22 12 14 15 8 1 21 16 8 8 12 8 * 215 Rate is a projection based on 214 ACOE data. 1 7 8 7 5 4 Table 1 shows the fatality rate calculated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) for all workers from 212 to 214 3. In addition, Table 1 shows the fatality rate for the transportation sector and towing industry. In comparison, the towing industry fatality rate has been below the BLS fatality rate for the Transportation Sector over the same period. Table 1 Comparison of Worker Fatality Rates Worker Fatality Rates per 1, FTE 212 213 214 Bureau of Labor Statistic (BLS), All Fatal Work Injuries 3.4 3.3 3.4 BLS, Fatal Work Injuries, Transportation Sector 14.6 14.4 15.4 Towing Industry, Crew Member Fatal Work Injuries 6.7 7.8 4.4 2 An FTE or Full Time Employee is the equivalent of one person working a 4-hour work week, for 5 weeks of the year. 3.http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfch13.pdf - 4 -

Oil Spill Volumes According to Coast Guard records, 147,7 gallons of oil was spilled as a result of 68 tank barge pollution incidents in 215. Chart 5 shows the total gallon quantity of oil spilled from tank barges for calendar years 1994 to 215. Chart 5 Oil Spilled from Tank Barges 1,942,144 With DBL-152 Gallons Spilled 96,618 The largest spill of 12, gallons was the result of a collision involving the UTV PB SHAH, UTV DEWEY R and their accompanying barges, which took place on the Lower Mississippi River in the vicinity of Columbus, Kentucky. The collision resulted in the release of nearly all the slurry oil from one tank on the barge APEX 358. This spill accounted for 82% of the total volume spilled in 215. The second largest spill of 22, gallons was the result of the UTV PECOS, which was pushing two gasoline barges, alliding with the moored tank barge KIRBY 282. The allision resulted in the release of naphtha into the Houston Ship Channel. This spill counted for 15% of the total volume spilled in 215. These two spills accounted for 97% of the total volume of oil spilled from tank barges in 215. Table 2 shows the number of oil spills by spill size. Table 2 Oil Spills by Spill Size, CY215 Gallons of Oil Spilled Number of Oil Spill Events (spill amounts in gallons) More than 1 3 (12k, 22k & 3k) 11 to 1 6 (42, 418, 3, 3, 132, & 126) 1 to 1 52 Less than 1 7-5 -

Oil Spill Rate The oil spill rate for 215 is projected to be approximately one gallon of oil spilled per 521, gallons transported, or 1.92 gallons of oil spilled per million gallons transported. Chart 6 shows the oil spill rate from 1994 to 215. The tank barge oil spill rate is calculated using Coast Guard spill data, along with data from the annual U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) publication Waterborne Commerce of the United States, Part 5, Table 2-3. The latest version of the publication is for calendar year 214. As such, the 215 spill rate is a projection based on 214 data. For 214, the ACOE reported 278.9 million short tons, or approximately 76.4 billion gallons of oil transported by barge on U.S. waterways. That amount represents 82.4% of all oil carried on domestic waterways. In 214, the amount of oil transported by barge increased by 5.8 million short tons or 1.6 billion gallons. This represents a 2.1% increase over 213. Chart 6 - Gallons of Oil Spilled by Tank Barges Per Million Gallons Transported Gallons of Oil Spilled per Million Gallons Transported 3. 25. 2. 15. 1. 5. 27.6 1.4 With DBL-152. Calendar Year * Projected The 2.1% increase in the amount of oil transported by barge from 213 to 214 was accompanied by an increase in the oil spill rate from.23 to 2.62. If oil transportation volumes remain steady, then the projected rate of 1.92 for 215 will be a slight improvement over 214. Overall, the oil spill rate is relatively low when considering the volumes transported, and the fact that oil transportation volumes have steadily increased since 21 (an 18% increase in volume over this period). - 6 -

Severity of Vessel Incidents Charts 7 and 8 show all towing vessel incidents by the AWO-USCG severity scale. The Severity Scale was developed by National Quality Steering Committee, and a description of the scale is provided at the end of this report. Towing vessel incidents include all reportable marine casualties that involve a towing vessel or barge. Each incident is counted only once, regardless of the number of vessels involved or events recorded. In 215, 84% of towing vessel casualties were classified as low severity incidents. Medium and high severity incidents represented 6% and 1% of all incidents, respectively. From 214 to 215, there was a significant decrease (34%) in all incidents recorded. Based on an initial review of the data, the following are possible reasons for the decrease in incidents: The release of the Marine Casualty Reporting Navigation and Inspection Circular (NVIC) 15-1, which clarified casualty reporting requirements for both industry and Investigating Officers. In particular, the NVIC clarified the reporting requirements for lower severity incidents. The change in MISLE database procedures and functionality which facilitates proper and accurate data entry. This change facilitates the proper documentation and classification of incidents in the Coast Guard database. A decrease in number of incidents was also observed in other industry segments (i.e. passenger vessels), and the Coast Guard will continue to analyze the data to determine causes for this phenomenon. Chart 7 - All Towing Incidents by Severity 25 Incidents 2 15 1 1457 1894 235 1963 1858 181678 17311744 1399 1467 141 217 1958 1965 235 1852 181 178 1797 1684 1184 5 Year High Medium Low - 7 -

While the total number of towing vessel incidents decreased by 34% from 214 to 215, the total number of medium and high severity incidents only decreased by 6.5%. Given that NVIC 15-1 specifically addressed the reporting requirements for lower severity incidents, it makes sense that the incident rates for medium and high severity incidents would not be as greatly affected by the NVIC. This was the first year that the number of high severity incidents was larger than the number of medium severity incidents. Since all incidents resulting in any crew member injuries resulted in a High Severity designation, this number is greatly influenced by the number of crew member injuries. In 215, there were 19 crew member injuries, which correlates with the 118 high severity incidents recorded. Incidents 16 97 Chart 8 - Medium and High Severity Towing Incidents 148 136 135 139 133 133 131 122 125 115 114 17 94 99 14 114 112 92 9 11 86 75 81 74 74 8 76 62 67 7 71 71 7 78 81 62 59 63 68 118 7 High 33 Year - 8 -

Chart 9 shows the medium and high severity incidents for 21 to 215 by the first event 4. 31% of medium & high severity incidents began with an allision. Material failure was the first event in 2% of marine casualties. Chart 9 - Medium & High Severity Incidents by First Event (CY21 to 215) Incidents 1, 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 895 Medium & High Severity Incidents, By 1st Event 21 215 582 324 294 223 14 13 113 Total = 2,887 62 36 25 2 13 12 18 4 The Coast Guard s information system is designed to document marine casualties as a series of events, with corresponding locations, involved vessels and other details. The First Event or Initiating Event is the first event in a sequence of events leading up to the casualty. - 9 -

Crew Member Injuries In 25, the Coast Guard began documenting injury severity with each incident investigation. A description of the injury severity scale is provided at the end of this report. In 215 there were 19 injuries to crew members where the vessel class or vessel service was recorded as towing vessel or barge. The breakdown of injuries by severity is shown in Table 3. There were only three incidents where more than one crew member was injured (one allision, two collisions). The most crew members injured in a single accident was four. Table 3 - Number of Injuries by Severity for CY 215 Injury Severity Count 2 - Moderate 46 1 - Minor 34 3 - Serious 23 5 - Critical 4 4 - Severe 2 Grand Total 19 There was a significant (34%) decrease in serious, severe and critical injuries between 214 and 215. Chart 1 summarizes crew member injuries by severity for calendar years 26 215. From 26 to 215, 71% of injuries were minor or moderate in severity. This compares well with 215 data, where 73% of crew member injuries were minor or moderate in nature. Chart 1 - Injuries by Severity (CY 26-215) 4 Severe, 68, 5% 5 Critical, 22, 2% 3 Serious, 314, 22% 1 Minor, 344, 24% Total = 1,412 2 Moderate, 664, 47% - 1 -

Chart 11 shows injury data by severity and accident type. The accident types most commonly associated with higher severity injuries are: Fall onto surface, Line handling/caught in lines, Struck by moving object, and Crushed between objects. Chart 11 - Injuries by Accident Type (CY26 215) 4 397 35 3 25 252 Injuries 2 15 127 156 143 123 118 179 1 5 26 45 57 27 47 23 21 6 3 38 All Injuries Most Significant (3 5) - 11 -

USCG-AWO Severity Classes for Towing Vessel Casualties Incident Severity Low Description Damage: $ - $5, or not reported No injuries or deaths Pollution: - 1 gallons of oil spilled CG Casualty Class: None/Routine Medium Damage: $5,1-$25, No injuries or deaths Pollution: 11-1 gallons of oil spilled CG Casualty Class: Significant High Damage: $25,1 or more ANY injuries or deaths Pollution: 1,1 or more gallons spilled Casualty Class Serious or Major USCG Injury Severity Scale - 12 -