BILLY BISHOP TORONTO CITY AIRPORT CAPACITY REPORT

Similar documents
PORTS TORONTO Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport Summary of 2015 Traffic and Passenger Surveys

2018 Airport Master Plan Overview of Development Concepts. Greg Ballentine (WSP)

SAN JOSÉ INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

Noise Mitigation Program

Forecast and Overview

VANCOUVER AIRPORT AUTHORITY TARIFF OF FEES AND CHARGES Effective January 1, 2019 Subject to Change PAYMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

ANNUAL NOISE MANAGEMENT REPORT 2017

APPENDIX D MSP Airfield Simulation Analysis

Treasure Island Supplemental Information Report Addendum

CHAPTER 4: ALTERNATIVES

AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE


Aeronautical Fees and Charges. Ottawa Macdonald-Cartier International Airport

EXHIBIT E to Signatory Airline Agreement for Palm Beach International Airport RATE AND FEE SCHEDULE

Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Orlando International Airport One Jeff Fuqua Boulevard Orlando, Florida Memorandum TO: FROM:

BILLY BISHOP TORONTO CITY AIRPORT 2018 MASTER PLAN UPDATE

FORECASTING FUTURE ACTIVITY

Performance monitoring report for 2014/15

Sunshine Coast Airport Master Plan September 2007

The CLE Master Plan Includes:

DEVELOPMENT OF TOE MIDFIELD TERMINAL IROJECT CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT REPORT DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION TOM FOERSTER CHAIRMAN BARBARA HAFER COMMISSIONER

The purpose of this Demand/Capacity. The airfield configuration for SPG. Methods for determining airport AIRPORT DEMAND CAPACITY. Runway Configuration

Classification: Public

5 Rail demand in Western Sydney

2018 Airport Master Plan. Public Meeting and Open House February 7, 2018

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

Westover Metropolitan Airport Master Plan Update

BNA Master Plan Update Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 5

I R UNDERGRADUATE REPORT. National Aviation System Congestion Management. by Sahand Karimi Advisor: UG

3. Aviation Activity Forecasts

The Dublin Airport Capacity Review carried out by Jacobs Consulting in December 2006.

Pre-Coordination Runway Scheduling Limits Winter 2014

IAA Submission on the Commission for Aviation Regulation s Draft 2014 Determination of Maximum Level of Charges at Dublin Airport

SouthwestFloridaInternational Airport

CONSOLIDATED MAY 8, 2017 CITY OF CAMPBELL RIVER PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BYLAW NO. 3211

AIRPORT WITH NO RUNWAYS IS A MALL

2 Aviation Demand Forecast

Runway Scheduling Limits Summer 2015

GATWICK AIRPORT SCHEDULING DECLARATION FOR SUMMER 2017

Amended & Restated Lease of Terminal Building Premises (Airport Use & Lease Agreement)

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office.

Appendix D Project Newsletters. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

Chapter 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

GATWICK AIRPORT JOINS VINCI AIRPORTS December 2018

Technical Memorandum. Synopsis. Steve Carrillo, PE. Bryan Oscarson/Carmen Au Lindgren, PE. April 3, 2018 (Revised)

12 th Facilitation Division

Landside Safety Programs

TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

1.0 Project Background Mission Statement and Goals Objectives of this Sustainable Master Plan

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (FLL) MASTER PLAN UPDATE PHASE 1

All aviation except commercial aviation. Including but not limited to business aviation, air taxi operations and technical flights.

Planning, Development and Environment Committee

COMMUNITY NOISE MITIGATION SUGGESTIONS

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

The demand/capacity analysis was performed utilizing Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) publications, including the following:

DETAILS AND PRINCIPLES REGARDING PROPOSED REVISED SERVICE CHARGES OCTOBER 1, 2000

Congestion. Vikrant Vaze Prof. Cynthia Barnhart. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology

HOW TO IMPROVE HIGH-FREQUENCY BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY THROUGH SCHEDULING

A. CONCLUSIONS OF THE FGEIS

STANSTED AIRPORT PLANNING APPLICATION UTT/18/0460/FUL SECTION 106 CONDITIONS TO BE REQUIRED IF PLANNING APPLICATION IS APPROVED

Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport Terminal Upgrade Project

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2009 Session

GATWICK NIGHT MOVEMENT AND QUOTA ALLOCATION PROCEDURES

Traffic Management Plan 2018

DRAFT. Airport Master Plan Update Sensitivity Analysis

Master Plan Update Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

Supplementary airfield projects assessment

Airline Schedule Development Overview Dr. Peter Belobaba

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan. MEETING DATE: November 19, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 7D

Savannah / Hilton Head International Airport Master Plan Update

Flight Regularity Administrative Regulations

NORTHERN ROCKIES REGIONAL AIRPORT Terminal Expansion ANALYSIS 31 st August 2012

NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO PROPOSED PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE APPLICATION NOVEMBER 9 TH, 2018

The Effects of Porter Airlines Expansion

A Multi-Agent Microsimulation Model of Toronto Pearson International Airport

Badgery s Creek Airport Presention. Revised from NAN 2015 AGM

Airport Master Plan. Brookings Regional Airport. Runway Runway 17-35

Bus Corridor Service Options

FACILITATION PANEL (FALP)

In this document the following words shall have the following meanings: Airport Coordination Limited, the Coordinator of London City Airport

New Opportunities PUBLIC WORKSHOP. Venice Municipal. Bringing g the pieces together

CATCODE ] CATCODE

Appendix. Gatwick Airport Ltd - Further information on Gatwick s revised phasing strategy (including Programme) Gatwick Airport Limited

VIRTUAL AIR TRAFFIC SIMULATION NETWORK UNITED STATES DIVISION. SUBJ: Phoenix (PHX) Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) Standard Operating Procedures

GATWICK NIGHT MOVEMENT AND QUOTA ALLOCATION PROCEDURES

Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). SUMMARY: Under this notice, the FAA announces the submission deadline of

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

SPADE-2 - Supporting Platform for Airport Decision-making and Efficiency Analysis Phase 2

Capacity declaration Amsterdam Airport Schiphol; winter 2017/2018. Environmental capacity; available number of slots for Commercial Aviation

Depeaking Optimization of Air Traffic Systems

8 OAMARU AIRPORT ZONE

Land Use Policy Considerations

Love Field Modernization Program Update: Master Planning Recommendations

Request to Amend the Tripartite Agreement for Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport Supplementary Report

CHAPTER 4 DEMAND/CAPACITY ANALYSIS

APPLICATION OF SIMULATION MODELS IN AIRPORT FACILITY DESIGN

Proposed Bicycle Lanes on Yonge Street from Queens Quay to Front Street

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

Comments on Notice of Proposed Amendment to Policy Statement U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration

Transcription:

BILLY BISHOP TORONTO CITY AIRPORT CAPACITY REPORT February 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 Noise Constraints... 1 Other Capacity Constraints... 1 DEMAND FORECASTS... 2 Planning Peak Hour... 3 CAPACITY/DEMAND ASSESSMENT... 5 Capacity Update... 5 NEF Constraints... 6 Taxiway/Apron Demands... 6 Passenger Terminal... 8 Air Terminal Demands... 11 Ferry... 13 Ferry Demands... 13 Passenger Transfer Facilities... 17 Ground Access and Curb... 17 TPA OBJECTIVES... 18 BBTCA RULES FOR CAPACITY & SLOT MANAGEMENT... 19 SLOT COORDINATION... 20 Page Billy Bishop Toron Centre Airport

INTRODUCTION Billy Bishop Toron City Airport (BBTCA) currently has one carrier operating scheduled air service, Porter Airlines, which has been adding flights and increasing passenger traffic as new aircraft are delivered. Other carriers have expressed an interest in operating at the Airport as early as April 2010. The tal requested slots are expected exceed the availability even in 2010 and the pressure for slots will continue increase over time. Noise Constraints Helicopters are now required follow flight paths and this will trigger their inclusion in the NEF calculations under the Tripartite Agreement for 2010, possibly reducing the slots available for large turboprops: "The actual NEF Conurs prepared in accordance with subsection (1) shall include the noise attributable helicopters for any calendar year during which flight paths were required be followed for at least half of that year pursuant section 35" Tripartite Agreement Yet another facr that may reduce the slots available is the flights traffic before 07:00 and after 22:00. To the extent that there are more of these quiet hour flights than forecast, they significantly reduce the available slots. Other Capacity Constraints The constraints of the Tripartite Agreement are not the only issues in determining the Airport s capability deal with increasing traffic volumes. The site is space constrained and other elements of the Airport or Airport access may point slot limits that are different than those limited by aircraft noise. The Toron Port Authority has determined that several of the systems will be at capacity in the near future and the Airport will be required address these capacity constraints as carrier operations increase. Several changes are already underway address some of these shortfalls, including the new air terminal and new ferry and the proposed pedestrian tunnel. In a constrained environment, slots become important the airlines on a time basis. It is insufficient for example allocate a carrier 10 slots between 13:00 and 14:00, or even allocate a carrier 20 slots a day if the availability of facilities means that in reality those slots cannot be used at commercially useful times. IATA defines a slot as: The scheduled time of arrival or departure available for allocation by, or as allocated by, a coordinar for an aircraft movement on a specific date at a coordinated airport. Billy Bishop Toron Centre Airport 1

BBTCA is indeed different from many other airports with slot management. At very large airports, slots are usually managed as a result of runway capacity constraints, and so precise timing of slots is commercially important the airlines. For example, the runway capacity for departing aircraft may be 25 an hour, yet competing airlines may all want a 07:00 departure. If that were not managed, the 25 th 07:00 flight would in fact take off at 08:00. At BBTCA, the noise based constraints, as well as other constraints may mean that the maximum number of scheduled departures in an hour will be in the range of 7-10, well below runway capacity. At this point, it is clear that management of slots and schedules will be part of the Airport operation from 2010 onwards and that the approach capacity and schedule management needs be developed now. The objectives of this study are: To review capacity and forecast demand on all major airport elements; To review the impact of the aircraft type mix on capacity and slot use; To develop proposed capacity limits and related schedule and slot constraints; and To review possible objectives and approaches for slot/schedule management. To meet the objectives, the consulting team: Prepared 2010 movement forecasts reflect the possibility of growth in movements of the existing and new carriers serving the Airport; Compared the capacity and demand for various elements of the airport, including the NEF constrained capacity; Developed objectives for managing the slots; and Proposed how ongoing slot management can be implemented. DEMAND FORECASTS Based on a preliminary assessment at the start of the project that NEF limits under existing demand patterns would limit slots approximately 166, a demand model for the use of these slots was prepared using existing schedules and commercially viable schedules and destinations for slots not currently in use. Table 1 provides a summary of the destinations served and numbers of flights assumed under the 166 slot scenario. Billy Bishop Toron Centre Airport 2

Table 1 Assumptions re Destinations Served and Numbers of Flights Under a 166 Slot Scenario Secr Origin Aircraft Departures Departing Seats Domestic YOW 23 1,490 YQB 3 210 YQT 3 210 YSB 1 70 YUL 20 1,280 Total Dom. 50 3,260 Transborder BOS 4 280 CLE 3 210 DCA 4 280 EWR 16 1,120 MDW 6 420 Total TB 33 2,310 Total 83 5,570 Total Slots 166 The minimum number of aircraft gates required by secr assuming a 20 minute buffer time between flights is presented in Table 2. A gate chart for the new 10 gate passenger terminal for the 166 slot flight schedule is presented in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 2 shows the aircraft gate requirements by time of day respectively. Planning Peak Hour Based on the nominal schedule and assumed load facrs, the planning peak hour numbers are: Enplaning domestic passengers 288 Enplaning transborder passengers 210 Enplaning Combined passengers 467 Deplaning domestic passengers 285 Deplaning transborder passengers 263 Deplaning combined passengers 530 Billy Bishop Toron Centre Airport 3

Exhibit 1 Aircraft Gating Charts for the 166 Slot Flight Schedule Billy Bishop Toron Center Airport Gating Chart for Busy Day Constrained 166 Slots Buffer Time: 20 minutes Domestic Service Transborder Service All flights are International Gate 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00 1 (TB) Arr-DepTime 2120-645 815-845 1025-1115 1230-1330 1400-1600 1730-1815 1905-1935 2000-2030 2120-645 2 (TB) Arr-DepTime 2135-645 745-810 845-920 1050-1130 1150-1215 1325-1500 1635-1720 1845-1930 2000-2030 2135-645 3 (TB) Arr-DepTime 818-848 1220-1250 1555-1700 1830-1900 4 (TB) Arr-DepTime 803-833 1010-1040 1122-1152 1258-1328 1618-1648 1727-1757 1849-1919 2115-2145 5 (Swing) Arr-DepTime 2155-650 805-830 850-0 1105-1135 1525-1620 1840-1930 2155-650 6 (Dom) Arr-DepTime 715-740 825-900 1205-1230 1310-1430 1815-1845 1905-1935 7 (Dom) Arr-DepTime 2215-700 800-830 900-930 0-1030 1-1130 1200-1230 1300-1330 1400-1430 1500-1530 1600-1630 1730-1800 1900-1930 2000-2030 2-2200 2215-700 8 (Dom) Arr-DepTime 2210-700 740-800 840-900 940-0 1040-1 1140-1230 1310-1400 1440-1500 1540-1600 1640-1700 1740-1800 1840-1900 1940-2030 2040-2200 2210-700 9 (Dom) Arr-DepTime 730-800 830-900 1-1200 1600-1630 1700-1730 1830-1900 10 (Dom) Arr-DepTime 740-810 840-910 1110-1210 1610-1640 1710-1740 1840-1910 Billy Bishop Toron Centre Airport 4

Table 2. Minimum Number of Aircraft Gates Required by Secr (2010) * Excluding swing gate Secr Gates All 10 Domestic* 5 Transborder* 4 Swing 1 Exhibit 2 Gate Requirements by Time of Day 12 All Airlines, All Secrs 10 Gates Required 8 6 4 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time of Day (hour) JACOBS C ONS ULTA NCY CAPACITY/DEMAND ASSESSMENT Capacity Update The capacity of the Airport has normally been thought of as governed by the NEF constraints contained in the Tripartite Agreement. While the noise boundary conditions are very likely govern, as traffic increases, other elements of the Airport may also have capacity constraints. Each major element is discussed below. Billy Bishop Toron Centre Airport 5

NEF Constraints The NEF constraints established in the Tripartite Agreement are dependent on the traffic mix, the time of flights and the approach slope for arriving aircraft: The modified Q400 currently operated at the airport (Q402) is quieter than the earlier series of this aircraft; Higher approach slopes being flown at the Airport result in a lower noise impact; Helicopter operations are required be incorporated in the noise calculations under some conditions. Less than ½ of the helicopter operations at the Airport are medevac operations; The volume of flight training operations and recreational flying affects the noise envelope and therefore the noise controlled slots available for commercial operations; and Flights before 07:00 and after 10:00 are heavily weighted in the noise modelling program, so a small change in quiet period operations has a big impact on tal noise constrained slots. Various noise scenarios were developed, with changing mixes of aircraft types, day/night operations and volumes of non-scheduled service traffic (GA, helicopters, etc.). The scenario selected for managing slots that most closely matched the Port Authority s business objectives and its commitments managing noise (the Operating Scenario) is the scenario that restricts quiet period operations the seven existing scheduled service flights that operate 22:00-06:59 and the evening operations of general aviation from 22:00 22:59 and in which the forecast fleet mix of heavy turboprops is 90% Q402 aircraft. This scenario yields 202 slots. Taxiway/Apron Demands The schedules generally show all gates being used overnight, with up ten departures in a fairly short period in the morning peak period. This will create a potential congestion issue on the apron when Runway 26 is used for arrivals and departures. The departure queue can potentially block access several of the gates as Exhibit 3 shows. Billy Bishop Toron Centre Airport 6

Protected and Confidential Billy Bishop Toron Centre Airport 7

Passenger Terminal The new passenger terminal is in the process of completion: seven gates are expected be available by March 2010, and a tal of ten gates are expected by Ocber 2010, subject project completion. Gates As Exhibit 1 illustrated, with the turn times for the large turboprop aircraft and a 20 minute buffer between flights, the estimated gate capacity is: For domestic gates 13 turns per day; For transborder gates 9 turns per day; and For a swing gate 11 turns per day. It is important recognize that a capacity of, say, 13 turns per day on a domestic gate does not mean that all such gates would be used for 13 turns per day. There may be times that a gate is available that are not commercially useful carriers. Passenger Terminal Demand Forecast Methodology The forecast demands on the passenger terminal and access system the Airport were developed from the schedules developed in Chapter II and the following: The forecast schedules were combined with Jacobs Consultancy s terminal demand model determine peak hour demands on the terminals, given assumed arrival distributions of the passengers at the facilities and other assumptions with respect load facrs by time of day. The model was modified include an additional model element dealing with demands on the ferry, enabling ferry load and cycle time be modified and showing passengers unaccommodated on ferries if they become overcrowded. Assumptions re Passenger Arrival Distributions Outbound passengers arrive at the terminal in a pattern that typically sees some passengers arriving very early as much as two hours before their flight, and others arriving much closer flight departure time. In a shuttle type operation primarily involving short haul flights and business travellers, we typically expect most passengers arrive in the period 70-30 minutes before the scheduled departure time. Exhibit 4 illustrates the assumed distribution pattern used prior the operation of US Preclearance. With preclearance, we expect the Transborder traffic distribution change. Although passengers will continue come as close departure as they can, US Homeland Security requires a cut-off of ticketing an hour before departure so that the passenger list can be reviewed. Exhibit 5 illustrates the assumed distribution with preclearance. Toron City Centre 8

Exhibit 4 Distribution of Departing Passengers Arrival Times at the Terminal. No US Preclearance 0.18 0.16 Portion of Flight Load 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 Off-Peak Peak - 110 120 110 90 80 90 70 80 60 70 50 60 40 50 30 40 20 30 10 20 0 10 Time Before Flight (min) Exhibit 5 Distribution of Departing Passengers Arrival Times at the Terminal with US Preclearance 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 Domestic Transborder 0.10 0.05-110 120 110 90 80 90 70 80 60 70 50 60 40 50 30 40 20 30 10 20 0 10 Toron City Centre 9

Inbound passengers have a much different demand characteristic, especially at a primarily short haul, primarily business operation such as BBTCA. Passengers empty the aircraft quickly and move directly through the terminal, only impeded by picking up luggage and, in the case of transborder traffic, by the processing of Cusms and Immigration (Exhibit 6). Exhibit 6 Inbound Passenger Distribution 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 Domestic Transborder 0.30 0.20 0.10-0 10 10 20 20 30 30 40 40 50 50 60 60 70 70 80 80 90 90 110 110 120 Assumptions re Load Facrs by Time of Day Load facrs do not remain constant throughout the day and we typically expect them be higher during the peak demand periods. Table 3 illustrates the assumed load facrs. These load facrs are used create planning day demands and planning peak hour demand estimates Table 3 Assumed load facrs Time of Day Load Facr 5:00am-9:00am 75% 9:00am-3:30pm 60% 3:30pm-7:00pm 75% After 7:00pm 50% Toron City Centre 10

Air Terminal Demands Exhibits 7 and 8 illustrate the forecast time of day demands on the air terminal buildings for the 166 slot schedule in 2010. Exhibit 7 Time of Day Arriving Passenger Demand 2010 Arriving Passengers in Hour 600 500 400 Passengers 300 200 0 Time of Day Exhibit 8 Forecast Time of Day Departing Passenger Demand 2010 Departing Passengers per Hour 500 450 400 350 Passengers 300 250 200 Toron City Centre 11 150 50 0 6:45 7:30 8:15 9:00 9:45 10:30 11:15 12:00 12:45 13:30 14:15 Time of Day 15:00 15:45 16:30 17:15 18:00 18:45 19:30 20:15 21:00 21:45

The terminal design was based on planning peak hour passenger levels of 672 departures and 672 arrivals and assumes full staffing by CATSA and CBSA. Preclearance The nominal schedules include four departing transborder flights in the peak hour. The peak outbound demand is 210 transborder enplanements. Taking in consideration the distribution of passenger arrivals at the air passenger terminal and the distribution of outbound flights, the peak loading in the preclearance area is approximately 180 passengers in the morning peak, as Exhibit 9 illustrates. This passenger load will typically require a holdroom area of approximately 3, sf (290sq.m.). The preclearance hold area is sufficiently large and appears have been sized for approximately 220 peak hour passengers. Exhibit 9 Transborder Enplanements Hourly Demand 2010 Passenger Demand by Flight Departure Tim e 200 180 160 140 120 80 60 40 20-0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Time of Departure CBSA Facilities The peak transborder arrivals occur between 8am and 9am, with a peak forecast demand of 263 deplaning transborder passengers. Taking in consideration the distribution of deplanements, the peak loading in the CBSA queuing area is somewhat less at 250 passengers as Exhibit 10 illustrates. This area, in which there is typically no seating, requires an approximately 2,000sf (190sq.m.) cope with the forecast peak loading. The area now under construction is approximately 260 sq.m., more than sufficient handle the forecast peak hour loading, provided that CBSA inspection lines are staffed. Toron City Centre 12

Exhibit 10 Transborder Deplanements Hourly Demand 2010 Passenger Demand by Flight Arrival Time 300 250 200 150 50-0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Time of Departure Ferry The new ferry will be in service by January 2010 and has an upper deck capacity of 150 passengers, with additional capacity though the use of Shuttle buses on the lower deck. Total people on board, including crew are limited 200 by the ferry certification. Ferry Demands The time of day of arriving and departing air traveller demands translate in demands for ferry and ferry terminal capacity. In simple terms: Departing passengers arrive at the ferry terminal in pattern that is driven by their flight departure time (Exhibits 4 and 5); Arriving passengers arrive at the ferry terminal very quickly on deplaning (Exhibit 6); Passengers queue for the ferry and take the next available ferry unless there is insufficient capacity on the ferry; and The accumulation of passengers in the ferry terminals is a function of ferry cycle time and ferry capacity. Toron City Centre 13

To model ferry demands, the aviation demands were translated in ferry demands at a 15 minute ferry headway i.e., the ferry leaves the Eireann Quay passenger transfer facility every 15 minutes and leaves the Island passenger transfer facility every 15 minutes. When the pattern of arrival of passengers at the Eireann Quay passenger transfer facility catch outbound flights is considered, the demands on the ferry are much less peaked than the departure schedules. Exhibit 11 illustrates the projected demands on the ferry departures from the Eireann Quay passenger transfer facility. 140 Exhibit 11 Forecast Outbound Ferry Loads on 15 minute Headway 2010 PASSENGERS PER HOUR 120 80 60 40 20 0 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 AM AM AM AM AM AM AM AM AM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM TIME OF DAY The pattern of departures means that even without taking in consideration the distribution of the passenger s arrival at the Eireann Quay passenger transfer facility, the new ferry will be able deal with the loads. The situation with the inbound demand is similar but with several severe peaks. Because the passenger loads all arrive at the Island passenger transfer facility within 5-10 minutes of the aircraft arriving at the gate, the demand levels can be sharply peaked. Exhibit 12 illustrates the inbound arrivals in 15 minute segments. The new ferry will go a long way taking pressure off what would otherwise be the lowest capacity point in the system. Nonetheless, both upper passenger deck and shuttle buses on the car deck will need be used meet the forecast demands by Ocber 2010. Toron City Centre 14

Exhibit 12 Inbound (Arriving) Passengers in 15 Minute Segments 2010 Arriving Passengers in 15 minutes 250 200 Passengers 150 50 0 7:15 8:00 8:45 9:30 10:15 11:00 11:45 12:30 13:15 14:00 14:45 Time of Day 15:30 16:15 17:00 17:45 18:30 19:15 20:00 20:45 21:30 The model calculates the passengers that would not be accommodated on the first ferry departure because of capacity constraints (assuming that a reasonable level of service is be maintained). The model was run with a ferry capacity of 150 (upper deck only) and 200 (upper deck plus car deck). Exhibits 13 and 14 illustrate the inbound passengers not served on the first ferry with only the passenger deck in use and with 50 or more passengers in shuttle buses on the car deck. With only the upper deck used for air passengers, in the morning inbound rush, some passengers will have wait for a ferry because of crowding. There is a need implement the movement of shuttle buses on the ferry as soon as possible. The need keep a high level of service cannot be emphasized enough. The Airport s business model is working precisely because the level of service is high in terms of travel time, hassle and congestion. If this model is allowed break down, the consequences could damage the viability of the entire concept. Because outbound passengers arrive in less lumpy pattern, the same issues do not exist at the 2010 traffic levels, although there is the possibility if only the passenger deck is used move passengers that there may be some passengers that cannot board one ferry at approximately 07:30. Toron City Centre 15

Exhibit 13 Inbound Passengers Not Served on the First Ferry after their Arrival with 150 Passenger Capacity - Upper Deck Only ( 2010) Passengers not Served on First Ferry 120 Arriving Passengers 80 60 40 20 0 7:15 8:00 8:45 9:30 10:15 11:00 11:45 12:30 13:15 14:00 Time of Day 14:45 15:30 16:15 17:00 17:45 18:30 19:15 20:00 20:45 21:30 Exhibit 14 Inbound Passengers Not Served on the First Ferry After their Arrival with 200 Passenger Capacity - Shuttle Buses on the Car Deck ( 2010) Passengers not Served on First Ferry Toron City Centre 16 Arriving Passengers 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 7:15 8:00 8:45 9:30 10:15 11:00 11:45 12:30 13:15 14:00 14:45 Time of Day 15:30 16:15 17:00 17:45 18:30 19:15 20:00 20:45 21:30

Passenger Transfer Facilities The two ferry passenger transfer facilities were each designed cope with a passenger load of 90 passengers at a high level of service. With a single ferry on a 15 minute cycle, the accumulation of passengers in the facilities will exceed the capacity of the buildings. In the Eireann Quay facility, the loading will decrease the level of service, but will be workable. The Island facility will see a peak demand of as many as 200 passengers, meaning that the terminal will be congested with passengers backed up in the corridors the air terminal. Ground Access and Curb The main components of the groundside facilities (excluding the ferry) are: The main access road Eireann Quay (formerly Bathurst St.); The public parking facilities: The spaces on the north side of Western Channel at the foot of Eireann Quay; The spaces in the Stadium parking lot (on the west side of the park); The spaces adjacent the air terminal building; The roadway in front of the passenger transfer facility at the south end of Eireann Quay. This is referred as the terminal frontage road (TFR); The taxi holding area; and The shuttle bus that operates between the Royal York Hotel and the passenger transfer facility at the foot of Eireann Quay. The section of Eireann Quay south of Queens Quay West could be characterized as a minor collecr street. Nominally, there are two northbound lanes when parking is prohibited (08:00-18:00). Rigorous channelization is not present in this section of roadway. When vehicles are parked in the northbound curb lane, the capacity of this roadway is significantly reduced. The capacity of this section of roadway is established by the signal timing at the intersection of Eireann Quay and Queens Quay West. The timing of these signals is under the jurisdiction of the City of Toron. There are 27 public parking spaces and 1 handicapped parking space on the north side of Western Channel by the passenger transfer facility. There are 192 parking spaces in the Stadium Road lot. The spaces in this lot are shared by the public and by employees of the Airport. The lot has recently been paved and marked. The roadway in front of the passenger transfer facility has two lanes. During peak periods vehicles are spped in both of these lanes load and unload. Approximately 20 meters of curb length are available in front of the facility. Toron City Centre 17

The taxi holding facilities consist of a two lane queue, 90 meters in length, and three parallel parking spaces on the inbound roadway immediately upstream of the curb in front of the passenger transfer facility. There is nominal capacity for 28 taxis, although as many as 34 can be seen in the queue. Table 4 compares 2010 forecast demand for landside access facilities current capacity. The taxi holding areas are currently at capacity during the peak periods of demand. The terminal frontage road is very congested during peak periods. Vehicles are spped in both lanes loads and unload. There is limited opportunity provide more capacity for this facility. Both parking and taxi srage are at capacity now. The demand for access is also related the pattern of traffic arrival. The large ferry will deliver passengers the Eireann Quay passenger transfer facility from the Island in 150-200 person lumps putting heavy demands on the taxi queue and terminal curb. On the Island, the parking area adjacent the air terminal building has approximately 170 spaces. The surface is asphalt pavement and the individual spaces are well channelized. Officially, both the public and employees can park in this area. Table 4 Comparison of Forecast Demand for Access Facilities Capacity Peak Hour Passengers (Inbound & Outbound) Daily Arr/Dep Passengers Curb Length Required (Meters) Taxi Holding Required (Vehicles) Public Parking Demand (Spaces) 2 Minute Dwell 90 Second Time Dwell Time 2010 Demand 980 7190 38 28 80 450 Current Supply 20 34 390 TPA OBJECTIVES Whether the slot cap is controlled by the NEF constraints or other system capacities, there will be a slot cap that will likely be 202 movements per day or less unless and until capacity can be improved. Slot and schedule management requires a rules-based system that is fair the carriers being scheduled. Generally, when we discuss slot management, we are discussing slots with an associated time or timeframe. The slots limited by the Tripartite Agreement are on a daily basis, but in terms of carrier needs and demands and in terms of the capacity of other elements of the system, they will be time-based. As a foundation developing slot allocation rules, it is valuable propose objectives for the Port Authority in managing the slots. In general terms, the Authority wants manage a financially sound airport creating maximum economic value for the GTA while respecting the Tripartite Agreement. With this fundamental statement, it appears that the Port Authority s specific objectives in managing the slots at the airport will be: Toron City Centre 18

To ensure that the number of slots allocated respects the Tripartite Agreement, and take measures adjust the number of slots as necessary respect the Agreement; To ensure that the tal number of slots and the timing of the slots takes in consideration the level of service objectives of the Authority and the capacity of all elements of the airport taxiways, aircraft parking stands, air terminal facilities, ferry passenger transfer facilities, ferries and ground access; To ensure that the slot allocation method is logical and fair users; To encourage the use of all slots by the quietest large turboprops; To encourage the use of all slots by the largest permitted turboprop aircraft; To encourage the use of slots maximize passenger choice of destinations served, consistent with air carrier s commercial needs for a minimum number of daily services on a route; To ensure that all slots allocated are linked aircraft stands (there must be a place for the aircraft be served before a slot is granted); To ensure that all large turboprop aircraft stands are linked a permanent terminal facility. This objective is prevent a recurrence of the temporary terminals that were constructed in the past and ensure that carriers serving the airport have a long term plan for, and commitment, use of the Airport and are not using services for predary pricing against those with a more substantial investment; To serve all transborder flights with a single pre-clearance area and a single CBSA area; and To allocate slots on a take or pay basis so that revenues are not foregone through unused slots. BBTCA RULES FOR CAPACITY & SLOT MANAGEMENT The Airport has some unique aspects that may not exist at other airports: Slots are both daily constrained and, during peak periods, hourly constrained; Airport operating costs should be borne by all carriers pro rata based on slots allocated, regardless of whether or not used; and The Port Authority needs be an active participant in preventing any predary behaviour that materially harms the Airport. Taking these unique requirements in consideration, the commercial carrier operating agreements need have Airport specific rules, including: Toron City Centre 19

Each carrier should be obligated sign a CCOA. The CCOA should similar in all material respects for all carriers; The specific overall slot cap number cannot be set in sne: the slot cap will be established from time time by the TPA taking in consideration the noise cap in the Tripartite Agreement and other capacity constraints; A neutral slot coordinar should be appointed; Slots need be allocated on a time basis; Slots need be linked gate availability; Applications for routes already served should be given lower priority than applications for new routes; and The TPA needs be able withdraw or reduce slots comply with the Tripartite Agreement or other capacity constraints. SLOT COORDINATION Slot management/coordination will be an ongoing role for a coordinar. It will be the coordinar s responsibility coordinate both the time based slots and the tal daily slots comply with the tal slot capability established by the TPA from time time. Toron City Centre 20

Next Steps for Slot Coordination The immediate action required in terms of slot coordination is: To determine the number of slots that can be made available for 2010 taking in consideration the scheduled service aircraft type mix, the current level of general aviation and helicopter operations and the amount of forecast traffic in the quiet hours. Given the capacity constraints in terms of Eireann Quay, ferry passenger transfer facilities, etc. it is recommended that the slots not exceed 202 in 2010 and only be set as high as this if the shuttle bus operation is enhanced reduce congestion on Eireann Quay and in the ferry passenger transfer facilities. To appoint a slot coordinar; and To incorporate the key airport specific elements of the slot coordinated regime in the CCOA. Toron City Centre 21