The scientific results shown for the questions below have a sample size of 1,008 and a 3.1% Margin of Error at a 95% confidence level.

Similar documents
Subject: Hillsborough County Florida General Election Survey conducted for StPetePolls.org

U.S. Travel Association Polling Presentation

Christmas - spending plans, religious significance and shifting summer holidays to February

Christmas - spending plans, religious significance and shifting summer holidays to February

PUBLIC OPPOSED TO GAMING S EXPANSION AND DIVIDED OVER REVENUE SHARING WITH AC

Chinese New Zealanders Domestic Travel Survey 2018

Juneau Household Waterfront Opinion Survey

U. S. Hispanic Travelers Report

IPSOS / REUTERS POLL DATA Prepared by Ipsos Public Affairs

ONE News Colmar Brunton Poll May 22-26, New Zealand s most respected market research company. ONE News Colmar Brunton Poll

The Essential Report. 25 February MELBOURNE SYDNEY BRISBANE ADELAIDE BRUSSELS

Tourism Industry Council Tasmania Community Survey 2018 Research Report. May 2018

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2015, Growing Public Support for U.S. Ties with Cuba - And an End to the Trade Embargo

PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH SURVEY RESULTS

2011 Visitor Profile Survey

March 2011 Visitor Profile

Survey of Cuban-Americans:

Measuring New Zealanders attitudes towards their oceans and marine reserves

April 2011 Visitor Profile

State of the Casino Visitor in America

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, January, 2015, Most Support Stronger U.S. Ties With Cuba

September 2016 Visitor Profile

WinterCityYXE Survey Report April 2018

REGIONAL RESIDENTS SURVEY on REGIONAL AMENITIES

Measuring New Zealanders attitudes towards their oceans and marine reserves

Seattle Southside Digital Media Conversion Study. Prepared by

SIENA COLLEGE RESEARCH INSTITUTE SIENA COLLEGE, LOUDONVILLE, NY

RNC Highlights: Romney Shares Top Billing With Eastwood

HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES/PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES Study # page 1

Premium Hotel Brand Image Survey Japan

PUBLIC OPINION IN KOSOVO BASELINE SURVEY RESULTS NOVEMBER, 2010

May 2009 Visitor Profile

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) Travel Decision Survey 2012

Travel Decision Survey Summary Report. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA)

2015 British Columbia Parks. Visitor Survey. Juan De Fuca Park. China Beach

Polling brief: Australia Day

Fast Lanes Study Phase III Telephone Survey Results

Augusta Visitor Report. Presented: April 20, 2017

Survey of Long Beach Voters

West Virginia 2011 Overnight Visitor Final Report

METHODOLOGY AND FINDINGS

Key Findings from a Nationwide Voter Survey Conducted August 29 September 8,

Tampa/Hillsborough County Visitor Report

Florida Voters Consider Manatee Protection

West Virginia Travel Report by Region 2013 Visitor Report

SURVEY OF U3A MEMBERS (PART 1)

Puerto Ricans in Rhode Island, the United States, and Puerto Rico, 2013

Predictive Economic Impact Study for the Mount Dora to Seminole Wekiva Trail

Number of tourism trips of residents increased namely for leisure

KEY FINDINGS JANUARY 2018 THE 2018 SURVEY OF THE ATTITUDES OF VOTERS IN EIGHT WESTERN STATES

Events Tasmania Research Program Hobart Baroque Festival

First Quarter 2014 Visitor Profile (January March) Amelia Island Tourist Development Council

Economic Impact Report. SKYCITY Triple Crown, Event V8 Supercars Championship June, Hidden Valley DARWIN

Baggage Fees User Guide and Codebook. Angus Reid Institute

ADC40 Summer Meeting July 25-27, 2016

Domestic Visitation to the Northern Territory

The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011

Key Findings from a Survey of Arizona Voters August Lori Weigel Dave Metz

2004 SOUTH DAKOTA MOTEL AND CAMPGROUND OCCUPANCY REPORT and INTERNATIONAL VISITOR SURVEY

AARP Travel Research: Solo Travel

Outdoor Adventures Department of Recreational Sports Spring 2017

New Zealand s 2011 Rugby World Cup: A Tourism Perspective

Irish Fair of Minnesota: 2017 Attendee Profile

2015 British Columbia Parks. Visitor Survey. Provincial Summary

Second Quarter 2014 Visitor Profile (April June) Amelia Island Tourist Development Council

SURVEY RESULTS: HOTEL AND HOSTEL GUESTS

1999 Reservations Northwest Users Survey Methodology and Results November 1999

Domestic Tourism to South West Wales in 2006, 2007 and 2008 Factsheet

2009 North Carolina Visitor Profile

Economic Impact of Cruise Tourism in Atlantic Canada*

Mississippi Gulf Coast Visitor Study December 5, 2016

West Virginia 2009 Visitor Report December, 2010

Tampa Bay 2014 Visitor Report

DARWIN CUP WEEKEND Economic Contribution to the Darwin Region

2015 Travel Survey. for the States of Guernsey Commerce & Employment Department RESEARCH REPORT ON Q1 2015

Economic Impact Analysis. Tourism on Tasmania s King Island

Understanding attitudes and beliefs towards aspects of the Newcastle Urban Transformation and Transport Program

Cornwall Visitor Survey 2010

Airport Profile. St. Pete Clearwater International BY THE NUMBERS 818, ,754 $ Enplanements. Passengers. Average Fare. U.S.

Merimbula Airport Catchment Research Study & Market Research Findings

Minnesota 2014 Visitor Report June 2015

Americans Favor New Approach to Cuba: Lift the Travel Ban, Establish Diplomatic Relations

South Australian Strategic Plan

JUNEAU BUSINESS VISITOR SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS

HOLIDAY HABITS REPORT 2017

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

6/28/11 TELEPHONE (n=400, RDD) AND ON-LINE (n=6,294) SURVEY RESULTS

Puerto Rican Entrepreneurship in the U.S.

2017 LRT Passenger Count Report

HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES/PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES Study # page 1

July 2018 RV PRODUCTION. Overview of towable and motorised recreational vehicles manufactured in Australia. Data Provided by nemaustralasia

Customer Satisfaction Tracking Annual Report British Columbia Ferry Services Inc.

Fourth Quarter 2013 Visitor Profile (October December) Amelia Island Tourist Development Council

Cedar Rapids Area Convention and Visitors Bureau Visitor Study

Myrtle Beach 2010 Conversion Study April Prepared by

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

Third Quarter 2015 Visitor Profile (July-September) Amelia Island Tourist Development Council

National Passenger Survey Spring putting rail passengers first

Second Quarter 2015 Visitor Profile (April-June) Amelia Island Tourist Development Council

Travel and Tourism in Ukraine: Key Trends and Opportunities to 2016

Transcription:

9887 4 th St. N., Suite 200 St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone: (727) 245-1962 Fax: (727) 577-7470 Email: info@stpetepolls.org Website: www.stpetepolls.org Matt Florell, President Subject: St. Petersburg Pier Design Survey Date: May 6, 2015 Executive Summary: This poll of 1,008 City of St. Petersburg, Florida Registered voters was conducted from Monday, May 4, 2015 to Wednesday, May 6, 2015. This poll used the registered voter lists supplied by the state of Florida as of April 6, 2015. The sample of voters that were contacted included random samples of registered voters within the boundaries of the City of St. Petersburg, Florida. The issues surveyed included questions related to the 2015 St. Petersburg Pier Design Process. Methodology: The poll was conducted by a web-based email polling system. The results were then weighted to account for proportional differences between the respondents' demographics and the demographics of the registered voter population for the City of St. Petersburg, Florida. The demographics used were: race, age and gender. The sample of voters polled was chosen at random within the registered voter population within the City of St. Petersburg, Florida. The survey contained two pictures from each pier design team that was asked about, as well as a 3-5 minute video of each design presentation, these were embedded into the survey. The average time spent taking the survey was over four and a half minutes per respondent. The scientific results shown for the questions below have a sample size of 1,008 and a 3.1% Margin of Error at a 95% confidence level. Notes: This survey was conducted using the same methodology as the survey we released on March 19 th which asked about the 7 Pier designs that were being considered at that time. http://stpetepolls.org/files/stpetepolls_2015_pier_march_19_h9rl_draft.pdf

Summary of Scientific Results: Of the two top ranked new St Petersburg Pier designs which do you prefer? (This question was asked twice during the survey) FIRST SECOND Destination St. Pete Pier: 37.9% 44.5% Pier Park: 46.8% 50.7% Undecided: 15.2% 4.8% Destination St. Pete Pier: Do you approve or disapprove of this design? Approve: 58.6% Disapprove: 31.6% Unsure: 9.8% Pier Park: Do you approve or disapprove of this design? Approve: 60.2% Disapprove: 30.4% Unsure: 9.5% Do you think that City Council should call for a referendum where the voters would decide their favorite of the top two ranked designs? Yes: 52.3% No: 40.5% Unsure: 7.2%

Detailed Results with Demographic Breakdowns for Each Question: Of the two top ranked new St Petersburg Pier designs which do you prefer? (This question was asked twice during the survey, details on second are below) FIRST Destination St. Pete Pier: 37.9% Pier Park: 46.8% Undecided: 15.2% Destination: 36.7% Pier Park: 47.9% Undecided: 15.4% Destination: 35.4% Pier Park: 52.1% Undecided: 12.4% Destination: 42.1% Pier Park: 39.2% Undecided: 18.7% Destination: 33.3% Pier Park: 49.6% Undecided: 17.0% Destination: 35.7% Pier Park: 48.5% Undecided: 15.8% Destination: 54.5% Pier Park: 33.3% Undecided: 12.1% Destination: 46.2% Pier Park: 38.5% Undecided: 15.4% Destination: 48.5% Pier Park: 42.4% Undecided: 9.1% Destination: 26.3% Pier Park: 63.2% Undecided: 10.5% Destination: 33.7% Pier Park: 51.4% Undecided: 14.9% Destination: 39.4% Pier Park: 44.3% Undecided: 16.3% Destination: 37.4% Pier Park: 44.0% Undecided: 18.7% Destination: 36.8% Pier Park: 48.0% Undecided: 15.2% Destination: 36.7% Pier Park: 50.9% Undecided: 12.4% Destination: 35.5% Pier Park: 43.2% Undecided: 21.3%

Of the two top ranked new St Petersburg Pier designs which do you prefer? (This question was asked twice during the survey) SECOND Destination St. Pete Pier: 44.5% Pier Park: 50.7% Undecided: 4.8% Destination: 42.2% Pier Park: 52.5% Undecided: 5.4% Destination: 39.7% Pier Park: 56.2% Undecided: 4.1% Destination: 49.3% Pier Park: 42.8% Undecided: 7.9% Destination: 39.0% Pier Park: 56.1% Undecided: 4.9% Destination: 40.3% Pier Park: 54.0% Undecided: 5.7% Destination: 72.7% Pier Park: 27.3% Undecided: 0% Destination: 69.2% Pier Park: 30.8% Undecided: 0% Destination: 51.5% Pier Park: 42.4% Undecided: 6.1% Destination: 42.1% Pier Park: 57.9% Undecided: 0% Destination: 39.1% Pier Park: 56.2% Undecided: 4.8% Destination: 45.1% Pier Park: 48.8% Undecided: 6.1% Destination: 48.4% Pier Park: 49.5% Undecided: 2.2% Destination: 41.9% Pier Park: 54.4% Undecided: 3.7% Destination: 40.4% Pier Park: 54.4% Undecided: 5.3% Destination: 43.2% Pier Park: 47.0% Undecided: 9.8%

Destination St. Pete Pier: Do you approve or disapprove of this design? Approve: 58.6% Disapprove: 31.6% Unsure: 9.8% Approve: 55.9% Disapprove: 33.8% Unsure: 10.3% Approve: 52.4% Disapprove: 37.1% Unsure: 10.5% Approve: 62.9% Disapprove: 26.6% Unsure: 10.4% Approve: 54.5% Disapprove: 35.6% Unsure: 9.8% Approve: 53.6% Disapprove: 35.6% Unsure: 10.8% Approve: 87.9% Disapprove: 9.1% Unsure: 3.0% Approve: 84.6% Disapprove: 7.7% Unsure: 7.7% Approve: 72.7% Disapprove: 18.2% Unsure: 9.1% Approve: 57.9% Disapprove: 36.8% Unsure: 5.3% Approve: 53.4% Disapprove: 36.1% Unsure: 10.5% Approve: 58.3% Disapprove: 31.3% Unsure: 10.4% Approve: 65.9% Disapprove: 20.9% Unsure: 13.2% Approve: 60.5% Disapprove: 33.1% Unsure: 6.4% Approve: 50.2% Disapprove: 39.0% Unsure: 10.8% Approve: 56.3% Disapprove: 29.5% Unsure: 14.2%

Pier Park: Do you approve or disapprove of this design? Approve: 60.2% Disapprove: 30.4% Unsure: 9.5% Approve: 60.3% Disapprove: 29.6% Unsure: 10.1% Approve: 63.9% Disapprove: 25.8% Unsure: 10.3% Approve: 52.9% Disapprove: 36.0% Unsure: 11.2% Approve: 61.7% Disapprove: 29.5% Unsure: 8.7% Approve: 60.3% Disapprove: 28.9% Unsure: 10.8% Approve: 51.5% Disapprove: 48.5% Unsure: 0% Approve: 61.5% Disapprove: 30.8% Unsure: 7.7% Approve: 54.5% Disapprove: 39.4% Unsure: 6.1% Approve: 84.2% Disapprove: 10.5% Unsure: 5.3% Approve: 65.9% Disapprove: 25.6% Unsure: 8.5% Approve: 54.5% Disapprove: 33.5% Unsure: 12.0% Approve: 68.1% Disapprove: 19.8% Unsure: 12.1% Approve: 63.5% Disapprove: 28.7% Unsure: 7.8% Approve: 59.2% Disapprove: 31.0% Unsure: 9.9% Approve: 54.6% Disapprove: 31.7% Unsure: 13.7%

Do you think that City Council should call for a referendum where the voters would decide their favorite of the top two ranked designs? Yes: 52.3% No: 40.5% Unsure: 7.2% Yes: 50.1% No: 43.0% Unsure: 6.9% Yes: 45.3% No: 48.7% Unsure: 6.0% Yes: 58.6% No: 32.7% Unsure: 8.6% Yes: 49.6% No: 43.6% Unsure: 6.8% Yes: 48.9% No: 44.2% Unsure: 6.9% Yes: 78.8% No: 15.2% Unsure: 6.1% Yes: 76.9% No: 7.7% Unsure: 15.4% Yes: 48.5% No: 45.5% Unsure: 6.1% Yes: 42.1% No: 52.6% Unsure: 5.3% Yes: 45.0% No: 48.8% Unsure: 6.2% Yes: 55.3% No: 37.0% Unsure: 7.7% Yes: 56.0% No: 30.8% Unsure: 13.2% Yes: 52.0% No: 41.2% Unsure: 6.8% Yes: 50.0% No: 44.5% Unsure: 5.5% Yes: 44.3% No: 48.1% Unsure: 7.7%