CONTRACT-BASED AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (CATS)

Similar documents
A TARGET WINDOWS MODEL FOR MANAGING 4-D TRAJECTORY-BASED OPERATIONS

CONTRACT-BASED AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (CATS) Project Overview & Work Plan

Follow up to the implementation of safety and air navigation regional priorities XMAN: A CONCEPT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF ATFCM CROSS-BORDER EXCHANGES

Cooperative traffic management

ERASMUS. Strategic deconfliction to benefit SESAR. Rosa Weber & Fabrice Drogoul

Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions AIRE

1. Background. 2. Summary and conclusion. 3. Flight efficiency parameters. Stockholm 04 May, 2011

Paradigm SHIFT. Eurocontrol Experimental Centre Innovative Research June, Laurent GUICHARD (Project Leader, ATM) Sandrine GUIBERT (ATC)

Aircraft Systems and 4D Trajectory Management

MET matters in SESAR. Dennis HART

Trajectory Based Operations (TBO)

Future Network Manager Methods

Module description: Traffic Sample. Pim van Leeuwen, NLR Second Demonstration Workshop Braunschweig, Germany June 25 th, 2013

SESAR CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT: AN ANSP CASE STUDY. Owen DAVIES Brussels Representative Department of International Affairs, NATS

SESAR Solutions. Display Options

Workshop. SESAR 2020 Concept. A Brief View of the Business Trajectory

i4d A MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE GROUND AND AIRBORNE ASPECTS Michel Procoudine Lionel Rouchouse Thales

Analysis of en-route vertical flight efficiency

PJ25: AMAN Arrival Streaming

Trajectory Optimization for Safe, Clean and Quiet Flight

Strategic airspace capacity planning in a network under demand uncertainty (COCTA project results)

ATM STRATEGIC PLAN VOLUME I. Optimising Safety, Capacity, Efficiency and Environment AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA DIRECTORATE OF AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

Sven Kaltenhäuser, Frank Morlang, Dirk-Roger Schmitt German Aerospace Center DLR

Air Traffic Flow & Capacity Management Frederic Cuq

Windmills & Airspace Can We Work Together?

Paradigm SHIFT. EEC Innovative Research Dec, Laurent GUICHARD (Project Leader, ATM) Sandrine GUIBERT (ATC) Horst HERING (Engineering)

SOFIA. Safe AutOmatic Flight Back and LandIng of Aircraft

Impact of a new type of aircraft on ATM

Flight Testing the Wake Encounter Avoidance and Advisory system: First results

ASPASIA Project. ASPASIA Overall Summary. ASPASIA Project

Defining and Managing capacities Brian Flynn, EUROCONTROL

The Network Manager User Forum 2017

Efficiency and Automation

NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES

Trajectory Based Operations

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW

The SESAR Airport Concept

Next Generation Airspace Developments: Key Operational Trends and Enablers

Assessment of the 3D-separation of Air Traffic Flows

Case study London Heathrow & London Heathrow-Amsterdam

ECOsystem: MET-ATM integration to improve Aviation efficiency

Phases of a departure

NM Top 5 Safety Priorities. Tzvetomir BLAJEV

34th ATS/Airline Safety Forum Health Check. Simon McDonald Safety Assurance

Operations Control Centre perspective. Future of airline operations

Operational Evaluation of a Flight-deck Software Application

Contents. Subpart A General 91.1 Purpose... 7

AIR/GROUND SIMULATION OF TRAJECTORY-ORIENTED OPERATIONS WITH LIMITED DELEGATION

Lisboa RFE. Respect the ATC and the other pilots at all times and be understanding.

Helicopter Performance. Performance Class 1. Jim Lyons

NEW CALEDONIA PBN PLAN

Modernising UK Airspace 2025 Vision for Airspace Tools and Procedures. Controller Pilot Symposium 24 October 2018

Demand capacity balancing in a dynamic fashion. Sonke Mahlich, EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre

B0 FRTO, B0-NOPS, B0-ASUR and B0-ACAS Implementation in the AFI and MID Regions

Towards the Future ATM

ART Workshop Airport Capacity

UPDATE ON THE 6 IDEAS (1-4) NAV CANADA

Network Manager Adding value to the Network 29 September 2011

Weather Integrated into 4D Trajectory Tools

ATC automation: facts and steps ahead

FUEL MANAGEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT

ATFM IMPLEMENATION IN INDIA PROGRESS THROUGH COLLABORATION PRESENTED BY- AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

International Conference Air Transport, Airports, Air Navigation & Globalisation of the Economics. Paul Willis Managing Director, Aviation Solutions

Object: LoA between the Barcelona FIR (LECB) and the Bordeaux FIR (LFBB)

Runway Condition Assessment: putting data together for enhanced Safety

AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT INDIA S PERSPECTIVE. Vineet Gulati GM(ATM-IPG), AAI

FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL (FLTOPSP)

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY SOFIA RYDELL ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE MANAGER COOPERATION FOR REDUCING AIRBORNE HOLDING TIMES AT DESTINATION AIRPORTS

How CFSPs work. processes, requirements, difficulties. Tuesday, June 19th, 2018 CFPSG PRESENTATION FABEC SC OPS/AOG RADISSON ZURICH AIRPORT 1

Interim Statement Ref. AAIU

IFR SEPARATION USING RADAR

EUROCONTROL. Centralised Services concept. Joe Sultana Director Network Manager 1 July 2013

PBN AIRSPACE CONCEPT WORKSHOP. SIDs/STARs/HOLDS. Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ICAO Doc 9931

An Automated Airspace Concept for the Next Generation Air Traffic Control System

Welcome to AVI AFRIQUE 2017

Federal Aviation. Administration. FAA Overview. Federal Aviation. Administration

THE AREA CONTROL CENTRE (CTR) POSITION

CENTRAL AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT ( C-ATFM ) INDIA CATFM. ATFM Global Symposium /22/2017 ATFM Global Symposium 2017

Advanced Safe Separation Technologies and Algorithms (ASSTAR) Project

Introduction Runways delay analysis Runways scheduling integration Results Conclusion. Raphaël Deau, Jean-Baptiste Gotteland, Nicolas Durand

Meteorology and ATM Capacity

ADS-B Seminar. National Institutes of Aviation Management and Research (NIAMAR) Rangpuri, Maharuli, New Delhi

International Civil Aviation Organization

A NextGen Mental Shift: The role of the Flight Operations Center in a Transformative National Airspace System. By: Michael Wambsganss Oct 11, 2012

Interval Management A Brief Overview of the Concept, Benefits, and Spacing Algorithms

LFPG / Paris-Charles de Gaulle / CDG

Operational Procedures

Including Linear Holding in Air Traffic Flow Management for Flexible Delay Handling

HOLDING STACK MANAGEMENT

DSNA NAVIGATION STRATEGY

Optimizing trajectories over the 4DWeatherCube

Burlington ATCT Standard Operating Procedures

Captain John Martin Head of Flight Safety Programmes

Dynamic Airspace Overview concepts, complexities, benefits and outlook

(Presented by the United States)

Design Airspace (Routes, Approaches and Holds) Module 11 Activity 7. European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation

Quiz 2 - Solution. Problem #1 (50 points) CEE 5614 Fall Date Due: Wednesday November 20, 2013 Instructor: Trani

Concept of Operations Workshop

EUROCONTROL Call Sign Similarity Project

The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist is available at & NAT Documents, NAT Documents, then NAT Ops Bulletins.

Transcription:

CONTRACT-BASED AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (CATS) Target Windows modelling Presented by Ion Berechet Air France Consulting CATS Final Workshop Le Bourget October 20th, 2010 Page: 1

Goal of WP2.2.4 To develop mathematical models of TW generation by integration actors and system constraints and capable to give margins of manoeuvre to limit the uncertainties of system. The deliverables of WP2.2.4 are: D2.2.4.1 Initial evaluation of the Target Windows for experimentations D2.2.4.2 Developed tools D2.2.4.3 Report on Target Windows modelling. Page: 2

Global approach for TW modelling CONSTRAINTS UNCERTAINTIES Signed TW TW MODEL Signed TW Status of constraints New TW set Actors negotiation & agreement Target Windows model gives margins of manoeuvre to limit the uncertainties Page: 3

Global constraints and TW modelling GLOBAL CONSTRAINTS Airline constraints Aircraft constraints Airport constraints Internal model constraints TW MODEL Sectors constraints System constraints Data modifiable by actors Signed TWs values Page: 4

Airline and Airport constraints Airline constraints Departure and Arrival times List of waypoints from Aircraft route Speed and Flight level values at some waypoints Destination airport TTA (for SESAR, out of AMAN horizon) according to Airport Airport constraints Departure and arrival capacity 4 reduced capacity imposed by meteorological constraints 4 reduced capacity imposed by infrastructure constraints Page: 5

Aircraft constraints Aircraft envelop data in normal conditions MinOperational speeds /FL MaxOperational speeds /FL Aircraft Performance data in normal conditions imum altitude rate of climb (ROC) rate of descent (ROD) Aircraft failure speed of the aircraft FL of the aircraft Page: 6

ANSP constraints (1) Sector constraints Capacity Environmental constraints 4 meteorological constraints interval time restriction / area 4 military area constraints interval time restriction / area Sector boundary constraints / TW 4 No SUP TW near X nm from boundary sector (proposed X = 10 nm) 4 No SUP TW near X nm of crossing points Paired level constraint 4 Odd FL constraint 4 Even FL constraint Altitude limits 4 lower altitude of sector in feet 4 upper altitude of sector in feet Boundary points geo position (lat/long) Page: 7

ANSP constraints (2) Network constraints Route network constraints Military area Environnement constraints Meteo Page: 8

System constraints The safety issues (D2.2.1 Risk and Safety Assessment), regarding the number of TW s overlapping at the same time, same area, same FL Minimum Separation TW s constraints Signed TW s values for other flights Page: 9

Uncertainties Target Windows model gives margins of manoeuvre to limit the uncertainties Ad hoc events occurrences 4 Logistical delays at airport 4 Reduced runway capacities 4 Meteorological phenomena 4 Occurrences on board aircraft Permanent uncertainty 4 Current aircraft position 4 Aircraft performance 4 Air mass properties 4 Measurement noise, noise model accuracy ATC-flight crew communications Separation function (conflict resolution,.) Page: 10

Illustration of TW calculation Aircraft constraints Uncertainty System constraints Tolerances TW values Callsign Example Interior Point Algorithm uncertainty time window aircraft time envelope tolerance time window Target Window time time i time i _time Target Window =, _time Target Window = { (time_acceptance ), (aircraft_time_envelope) } { (time_acceptance), (aircraft_time_envelope) } time Page: 11

Example of SUP TW overlapping responsibility transfer plan P3 i SUP TW i time i,time [ ] i P2 j NW N NE P2 i W E P1 i CP i S ij P4 j SW S SE P3 j CP J SUP TW j time j,time [ ] j P4 i Callsign i P1 j Callsign FL275 j FL345 Page: 12

Example of ADJ TW s overlapping sector frontier " odd "or " even "level responsibility transfer area ADJ TW i [ time i,time ] i [ time j,time ] j ADJ TW j level i level j CrossingPoint i S ij Callsign i P1 i segmp1p2 i CrossingPoint j P2 i FL i FL j Callsign j P1 j segmp1p2 j level i level j P2 j Page: 13

Illustration of TWs de-confliction by time separation Callsign i time i limit _ acceleration time i time i time i limit _ deccelerat ion Callsign j time j limit _ acceleration time j time j time j limit _ deccelerat ion potential conflict Callsign i newtime i newtime i Callsign j newtime j newtime j time sepatation Just for overlapping Page: 14

Summary Two kinds of TWGenerators were developed: For planning phase 4 TWG use an external Trajectory Predictor For execution phase 4 TWG use an internal Trajectory Predictor The TWGs were converted in executable using Converter MATLAB tools (TheMathWorks) These tools have been used during the execution of the HIL experiments to calculate initial values of the Target Windows (HIL1 and HIL2) and also to renegotiate them during HIL3 Page: 15

Thank you for your attention! www.cats-fp6.aero/ Page: 16

Example of generated TW file for HIL experiments [AFR1504] 1=ADJ;17:53:53;18:01:13;290;330;;FD;KL1;MOKIP+;46.4371/5.1557;46.5935/5.2155;46.2808/5.0958 2=ADJ;18:11:08;18:17:50;290;330;;KL1;;LAPRI+;44.9796/7.1720;45.1235/7.1922;44.8358/7.1518 3=ADJ;18:33:31;18:38:07;280;340;D;;FD;SIPLO-;43.9294/10.3703;43.9345/10.4900;43.9244/10.2507 4=APT;18:58:09;19:01:09;;;;;LIRF;;;;; [SWR342Z] 1=SUP;17:39:06;17:46:28;275;275;C;FD;;LUKIM-44.0641/9.3694;43.7616/9.2996;44.3666/9.4393;44.1339/9.0669 2=ADJ;17:54:21;18:01:11;280;340;C;;KL1;PIMOT+;45.5048/7.7189;45.4233/7.5926;45.5864/7.8451 3=SUP;17:56:53;18:03:39;345;345;C;KL1;FD;AOSTA;45.7378/7.4207;45.4673/7.4113;46.0083/7.4302;45.7472/7.1502 4=APT;18:47:00;18:50:00;;;;;EBBR;;;;; [VEX55N] 1=ADJ;17:59:08;18:06:02;280;340;;FD;;BELEL+;43.5645/9.7607;43.5063/9.6205;43.6227/9.9009 2=ADJ;18:19:24;18:25:48;300;340;;;KL1;PIMOT+;45.5048/7.7189;45.4320/7.6060;45.5777/7.8317 3=ADJ;18:34:56;18:40:56;320;340;;KL1;FD;GILIR-;47.0542/6.2447;47.0156/6.1301;47.0929/6.3594 4=APT;19:12:33;19:15:33;;;;;EBBR;;;;; [TSO9121] 1=ADJ;17:06:33;17:12:29;290;330;;FD;;LUSIL-;46.0494/10.1308;45.9538/10.2010;46.1450/10.0606 2=ADJ;17:26:52;17:32:34;290;330;;;FD;VAMTU-;44.1532/7.6319;44.1057/7.7305;44.2007/7.5332 3=APT;18:10:02;18:13:02;;;;;LEBL;;;;; [EZS1118] 1=ADJ;17:55:50;18:03:06;280;340;;FD;;BELEL+;43.5645/9.7607;43.5012/9.6081;43.6278/9.9133 2=ADJ;18:18:00;18:24:04;320;340;;;FD;ABESI+;46.1670/9.0410;46.1591/8.9183;46.1748/9.1637 3=APT;18:40:20;18:43:20;;;;;LFSB;;;;; Page: 17