RUNWAY OPERATIONS: Computing Runway Arrival Capacity

Similar documents
RUNWAY OPERATIONS: Computing Runway Arrival Capacity

CEE 320. Fall Route Choice

Airfield Capacity Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Analysis of Air Transportation Systems. Airport Capacity

Background. Military aviation and runway incursions. EAPPRI and military. Conclusion

Assignment 10: Final Project

Time-Space Analysis Airport Runway Capacity. Dr. Antonio A. Trani. Fall 2017

Determining Airport Acceptance Rate (AAR) Mexico City Airport Case Study

ACRP Project Evaluating Airfield Capacity

Safety & reliability of software-controlled systems. Part 7: Risk & safety

Integrated Optimization of Arrival, Departure, and Surface Operations

Manchester Airport Departure Routes Information Pack

SAFETY STOCK ESTIMATION OF UNIT LOAD DEVICES FOR INTERNATIONAL AIRLINE OPERATIONS

Manchester Airport Departure Routes Information Pack

Quiz 2 - Solution. Problem #1 (50 points) CEE 5614 Fall Date Due: Wednesday November 20, 2013 Instructor: Trani

! Figure 1. Proposed Cargo Ramp at the end of Taxiway Echo.! Assignment 7: Airport Capacity and Geometric Design. Problem 1

Application of queuing theory to the container terminal at Alexandria seaport

What to do if uncertain of your position on the manoeuvring area

Validation of Runway Capacity Models

ACRP Project 03-17: Evaluating Airfield Capacity

ASSESSING THE LEVEL OF ACTIVITY OPPORTUNITIES SECURED BY RURAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT SERVICE: THE CAPABILITY APPROACH

ESTIMATION OF BUS TRAVEL ORIGIN-DESTINATION MATRIX ON A CORRIDOR USING SCREENLINE COUNTS ABSTRACT

Appendix F Aircraft Manufacturers

Airport Engineering Lectures

Chapter 8 Airport Layout Drawings

ANA HOLDINGS Financial Results for the Year ended March 31, 2017

A Note on Runway Capacity Definition and Safety

Defining and Managing capacities Brian Flynn, EUROCONTROL

COMMISSIONING OF RAPID EXIT TAXIWAYS AND CHANGE IN DESIGNATOR OF TAXIWAYS KEMPEGOWDA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, BENGALURU (VOBL)

Master Plan Update Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

Operational Safety Study: Landing without ATC clearance

A Study of Tradeoffs in Airport Coordinated Surface Operations

Annual Safety Report 2012

Manchester Airport Departure Routes Information Pack

Airport Apron Roundabout Operational Concept and Capacity Evaluation

Operational Safety Study: Controller Detection of Potential Runway and Manoeuvring Area Conflicts

2017 Chinese Youth Camp The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas Sunday, July 23 Saturday, July 29 Sunday, July 23 is the FIRST DAY of Camp!

Operational Safety Study: Risk of operation without a transponder or with a dysfunctional one

Key Purpose & Need Issues

Backpack. Travel Gear for the Avid Golfer. Limited One-Year Warranty

COMMISIONING OF REMOTE EAST APRON & PUSHBACK AND START UP PROCEDURE FOR AIRCRAFT RAJIV GANDHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SHAMSHABAD (HYDERABAD) (VOHS)

Operational Performance and Capacity Assessment for Perth Airport

Future Airport Concept (Increasing the Airport Capacity)

Airport capacity effects of RECAT or: An airport view on RECAT

Rockford Is Aerospace. m i d-am e r i ca s b e s t i n t e r n at i o n a l ae r o s pac e com m u n i t y

Surface Congestion Management. Hamsa Balakrishnan Massachusetts Institute of Technology

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

Proceedings of the 54th Annual Transportation Research Forum

RADIO COMMUNICATIONS AND ATC LIGHT SIGNALS

Nav Specs and Procedure Design Module 12 Activities 8 and 10. European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation

QUEUEING MODELS FOR 4D AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS. Tasos Nikoleris and Mark Hansen EIWAC 2010

Air Transportation Systems Engineering Delay Analysis Workbook

UNDER NEW OWNERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT

Analysis of Operational Impacts of Continuous Descent Arrivals (CDA) using runwaysimulator

Enhanced Time Based Separation (ETBS) & RECAT EU. Heathrow Crew Briefing

Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport Monthly Runway Use System Report. June 2015

Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport Monthly Runway Use System Report. June 2016

ARCHERFIELD AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL PAPER TP 03/10 RUNWAY CAPACITY

Noise Compatibility Year End, 2012

Legacy Rawhide Hose HOSE. Rawhide 1-Wire 4000 PSI Black Hose. Rawhide 1-Wire 3000 PSI Smooth Non-Marking Hose. Rawhide Smooth Cover Black Hose

Research On Reducing The Cost of Stopping Port By Queuing Theory

Supplementary airfield projects assessment

EUROCONTROL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF PCP IR AF1 ON MILITARY OPERATIONS

Cross-sectional time-series analysis of airspace capacity in Europe

Framework for an Airside Vehicle Driver Training Programme. Framework for Manoeuvring Area Vehicle Driver Training Programme

The Impact of Travel Time Reliability and Perceived Service Quality on Airport Ground Access Mode Choice

Ref. AIM Para AOPA Air Safety Foundation Supported by the FAA Ref. AIM Para Supported by the FAA

(Avg Airfare * AS) 2. Column 3: Calculate the Total Revenue for each combination of Average Airfare and Cumulative Passenger Travel Demand (20 pts)

A Network Model to Simulate Airport Surface Operations

CAUTION! JET BLAST ON APRON

INSECT S. DISEASE 'MANAGEMENT

AERODROME LIGHTING SYSTEM

Evaluation of Strategic and Tactical Runway Balancing*

Navigation - Runways. Chap 2, Nolan

DEPARTMENT: CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE / Name: CE2303/ Railway, Airport and Harbors Engineering 2 MARK QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The Departure Regulator: A Working Paper

A Comparison of Cirque Features in the Sierra Nevada and Trinity Mountains. Iris Surname Benjamin Holt Christopher Surname

Heathrow Community Noise and Track-keeping Report: Burhill

AERODROME DATA CHHATRAPATI SHIVAJI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, MUMBAI (VABB)

Table of Contents. Overview Objectives Key Issues Process...1-3

EUROCONTROL RPAS ATM CONOPS. Edition 4.0

Modeling the Impact of the A380 on Airport Capacity

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW

Design of a Control Law for an Autonomous Approach and Landing Spacing System

System Oriented Runway Management: A Research Update

Friedman Memorial Airport Authority. Regular Meeting September 4, 2012

ICAO Recommended Airport Signs, Runway And Taxiway Markings. COPYRIGHT JEPPESEN SANDERSON, INC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Revision Date:

Flight Deck Surface Trajectory Based Operations (STBO):

Linear programming: complicating constraints

Abstract. Introduction

Impact of systematic factors on delays at Schiphol

Analysis of ATM Performance during Equipment Outages

CDM Quick Reference Guide. Concepts I Need to Know for the Exam

Improving Bus Service Reliability: The Singapore Experience

IVAO Switzerland Division

IRELAND AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICE IRISH AVIATION AUTHORITY BALLYCASEY CROSS SHANNON CO. CLARE Tel Fax

Airport Master Plan for. Brown Field Municipal Airport PAC Meeting #3

US/Canada Differences

Regional Jets ,360 A319/ , , , ,780

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

Transcription:

RUNWAY OPERATIONS: Computig Ruway Arrival Capacity OR750 /SYST660 USE Ruway Capacity Spreadsheet Sprig 2008 Lace Sherry 1 CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH

Backgroud Air Trasportatio System Ifrastructure is composed of: Airports Airside (ruways, taxiways, ramps, ) Ladside (termials, passeger louges, access roads, retal cars, busses, parkig, Air Traffic Cotrol Tower Termial Area E-route 2

Ruway Capacity Defiitio Assumptios ad Notes % of MTC Maximum Throughput Capacity (MTC) Expected umber of movemets performed i 1 hour Does ot violate ATC separatio rules Cotiuous Demad No limits o delays Practical Hourly Capacity (PHCAP) Expected umber of movemets performed i 1 hour Delay set to average 4 mi delay per vehicle Avg of 4 mi delay, meas some vehciles >> 4 mis Ruway capacity achieved whe avg delay = 4 mis 80-90% of MTC Declared Capacity Number of movemets per hour at a reasoable LOS (i.e. delay miutes = 3 mi) Used for Schedule Coordiatio (i Europe). Sets limit o scheduled arrivals/departures 85-90% of MTC Sustaied Capacity Number of movemets per hour tha ca be reasoably sustaied over period of several hours Split i Airport Arrival Rate (AAR) ad Airport Departure Rate (ADR) 90% of MTC with good weather MTC 100% of MTC with bad weather MTC See deneufville/odoi (2004) pages 370 to 374 3

Ruway Operatios Arrivig aircraft lad Departig aircraft takeoff Ruway capacity determied by: Separatio distace betwee arrivig aircraft Separatio Distace Violatio Separatio distace betwee departig aircraft Separatio Distace Violatio Oly oe aircraft o ruway at ay time Simultaeous Ruway Occupacy Separatio distace ad Ruway Occupacy Time (ROT) determied by aircraft type (weight/lift, ladig speed, ) Heavy (e.g. 747-400) Large (e.g. 777, 767) Medium (e.g. 737) Small (e.g. RJ) 4

Model for Ruway Arrivals Ruway 5 legth of fial approach i(j) type of leadig (trailig) aircraft V i groud speed of aircraft type i O i ruway occupacy time of aircraft type i S ij miimum separatio distace betwee two airbore aircraft i ad j T ij miimum acceptable time iterval betwee successive arrivals at ruway of aircraft type i ad type j

Miimum Time Separatio Betwee 2 Aircraft Ruway ca oly have sigle aircraft at a time Miimum separatio distace betwee arrivig aircraft must be maitaied at all times T ij > O i miimum acceptable time iterval betwee successive arrivals at ruway of lead aircraft type i ad follow aircraft type j > ruway occupacy time of aircraft type i 6

Arrival Two Cases Lead aircraft of type i is faster tha follow aircraft of type j Case: Expadig Separatio Lead aircraft of type i is slower tha follow aircraft of type j Case: Decreasig Separatio 7

Expadig Separatio (v i >v j ) j s ij i j > s ij i Ruway /v i ( + s ij )/v j T ij = Miimum Acceptable Time Iterval betwee successive Arrivals max of 1. (( + s ij )/v j ) (/v i ) (time for follow aircraft (j) to fly separatio distace plus fial approach path) (time of lead aircraft (i) to fly fial approach path) 2. o i occupacy time of lead aircraft 8 Ruway

Costat Separatio (v i =v j ) Expadig Separatio (v i >v j ) /v j Time Time i j Rwy Threshold /v j NOT DRAWN TO SCALE Rwy Threshold i (/vi) j (( + sij)/vj) (/vi) (( + sij)/vj) 9 Rwy Exit Rwy Exit Distace o i Distace o i

Decreasig Separatio (v i < v j ) Ruway > s ij s ij T ij = Miimum Acceptable Time Iterval betwee successive Arrivals max of 1. (s ij /v j ) (time for faster follow aircraft (j) to fly separatio distace) (time of lead aircraft (i) to fly fial approach path) 2. o i occupacy time of lead aircraft 10 Ruway

Costat Separatio (v i =v j ) Cotractig Separatio (v i <v j ) Time Time j i Rwy Threshold /v j NOT DRAWN TO SCALE Rwy Threshold j i (/vi) (( + sij)/vj) /v j 11 Rwy Exit Rwy Exit Distace o i Distace o i

Mixed Fleet Arrivals Average Miimum Acceptable Iter-arrival Time E[T ij ] = Σ i to K Σ j to K p ij T ij K umber of aircraft types K 2 umber of aircraft type i followed by aircraft type j (pairs) p ij probability of aircraft type i followed by aircraft type j Maximum Capacity Throughput (MCT) = arrivals/hour = 1/E[T ij ] Assumes cotiuous supply of arrivig aircraft Assumes o arrival queueig delays Sustaied Capacity Throughput (SCT) = arrivals/hour = 1/E[T ij + δ] δ = 10 secs = additioal distace (paddig) used by Air Traffic Cotrollers to avoid violatig separatio distace 12

Example Aircraft Type i p i v i o i H 0.2 150 70 L 0.35 130 60 M 0.35 110 55 S 0.1 90 50 S = Follow (j) Lead (i) H L M S H 4 5 5 6 L 2.5 2.5 2.5 4 M 2.5 2.5 2.5 4 S 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 P = Follow (j) Lead (i) H L M S H 0.0 4 0.07 0.07 0.02 L 0.07 0.1225 0.1255 0.035 M 0.07 0.1225 0.1255 0.035 S 0.02 0.035 0.035 0.01 δ = 10 secs E[Tij] = 116.3 Sustaied Capacity Throughput (Arrivals/Hour) = 30.9 aircraft/hours 13

Limitatios of Model Model assumes: idepedet ruway (o itersectios or parallel) Ladig aircraft oly Wid speed ad directio v i ad o i should be radom variables Separatio distace should be radom variables 14

END 15

Homework: Ruway Operatios - Arrivals Use Ruway Operatios Arrival Spreadsheet 1. Plot a graph with Max # Arrivals/Hour o y-axis, Aircraft Type (i,j) o the x-axis ( H-H, L-L, M-M, S-S). What aircraft type pairig geerates the highest umber of operatios? What aircraft type pairig geerates the highest umber of operatios? Plot a graph with Total # Seats o y-axis, Aircraft Type (i,j) o x-axis (H-H, L-L, M-M, S-S). Assume seats for aircraft type as follows: H=524, L=304, M=44, S=36. What aircraft type pairig geerates the highest umber of seats for arrivals? What aircraft type pairig geerates the lowest umber of seats for arrivals? 16