Monthly Employment Watch: Milwaukee and the Nation's Largest Cities

Similar documents
Monthly Employment Watch: Milwaukee and the Nation's Largest Cities

Monthly Employment Watch: Milwaukee and the Nation's Largest Cities

Monthly Employment Watch: Milwaukee and the Nation's Largest Cities

Monthly Employment Watch: Milwaukee and the Nation's Largest Cities

Monthly Employment Watch: Milwaukee and the Nation's Largest Cities

Rank Place State Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander population (alone or in combination

Lower Income Journey to Work Market Share From American Community Survey

Census Affects Children in Poverty by Professors Donald Hernandez and Nancy Denton State University of New York, Albany

Park-Related Total* Expenditure per Resident, by City

RANKING OF THE 100 MOST POPULOUS U.S. CITIES 12/7/ /31/2016

Location, Location, Location. 19 th Annual NIC Conference NIC MAP Data & Analysis Service

MANGO MARKET DEVELOPMENT INDEX REPORT

Major Metropolitan Area Sales Tax Rates

University of Denver

Major US City Preparedness For an Oil Crisis Which Cities and Metro Areas are Best Prepared for $4 a Gallon Gas and Beyond?

Appendix D: Aggregation Error for New England Metro Areas and for Places

Mango Market Development Index

Hector International Airport Fargo, North Dakota

Hector International Airport Fargo, North Dakota

Hector International Airport Fargo, North Dakota


Social Media In Your New & Improved Phoenix Sky Harbor

Population Estimates for U.S. Cities Report 1: Fastest Growing Cities Based on Numeric Increase,

Emerging Trends in Real Estate Sustaining Momentum but Taking Nothing for Granted

Hotel Valuation and Transaction Trends for the U.S. Lodging Industry

District Match Data Availability

REGIONALLY FOCUSED. GLOBALLY COMPETITIVE.

A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS

FBI Drug Demand Reduction Coordinators

Parking Property Advisors and Parkopedia present: TOP 40 US CITIES PARKING INDEX

Fort Lauderdale August 8, 2017

Norwegian's Free Airfare Promotion

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION INTRODUCTION

Get Smart Market Insights from Our Research Team Customer Conference

Access Across America: Transit 2014

Higher Education in America s Metropolitan Areas A Statistical Profile

Interest Bearing. Availability Schedule. April For Encoded Cash Letter Deposits received in Miami. Instructions. Schedule

San Francisco Travel Association Selling in a Seller s Market DMO Perspective. May 21, 2014

TOP 100. Transit Bus Fleets Agency 35 ft. Over Artic and 35 ft. Total +/- under 0 3, ,426 82

Agency 35 ft. Over Artic. Trolley 2012 Total and 35 ft. under. 1 1 MTA New York City Transit 0 3, ,344 New York City

Rent Monitor. First Quarter Vol. 83 % GROWTH IN NATIONAL RENTS BY SECTOR NATIONAL EFFECTIVE RENTS BY SECTOR TOP 5 MARKETS GAINING MOMENTUM**

High-Speed Rail: Realizing the Potential of Megaregion Economies

Aviation Insights No. 5

MARKETBEAT U.S. Office

MARKETBEAT U.S. Office

Who Sprawls the Most?

TOP 100 Bus Fleets Agency 35 ft. and Over Artic under 35 ft. Total. 18 < metro magazine SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2018 metro-magazine.

MARKETBEAT U.S. Industrial Snapshot Q4 2015

OB-GYN Workload & Potential Shortages: The Coming U.S. Women s Health Crisis

The FMR history file contains the following fields, all for 2-bedroom FMRs. It is in EXCEL format for easy use with database or spreadsheet programs.

Metropolitan Votes and the 2012 U.S. Election: Population, GDP, Patents and Creative Class

333 W. Campbell Road, Suite 440 Richardson, Texas Cruising for Charity with Randy Limbacher in Tahiti July 28, 2007

MARKETBEAT U.S. Office

MARKETBEAT U.S. Office

Regional Outlook STEVEN G. COCHRANE, MANAGING DIRECTOR

INDIANA INTERSTATE AND INTRASTATE LOCAL REDUCED CITY-PAIR FARES

MARKETBEAT U.S. Office

BLACK KNIGHT HPI REPORT

MARKETBEAT U.S. Office

Non-stop Scheduled Passenger Service at Fargo as of October Top 20 Domestic O&D Passenger Markets at Fargo Twelve Months Ended June 2006

Hotel Valuation and Transaction Trends For the U.S. Lodging Industry

2016 City Park Facts

MARKETBEAT U.S. Office

ustravel.org/travelpromotion

Per capita carbon emissions from transportation and residential energy use, 2005

Passengers Boarded At The Top 50 U. S. Airports ( Updated April 2

TO COME City Park Facts

DIRECT FASTENING. 20V MAX * Cordless Concrete Nailer

ILLINOIS INTERSTATE AND INTRASTATE LOCAL REDUCED CITY-PAIR FARES

U.S. Lodging Industry Update

1Q 2014 Greater Atlanta HBA Builder Developer Lender Council meeting Information presented by. Atlanta Job Growth

MARKETBEAT U.S. Industrial

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/14/ :25 PM INDEX NO / /4/2016 Office locations in US states: PwC

United States Office 2Q 2016

2012 Airfares CA Out-of-State City Pairs -

MARKETBEAT U.S. Industrial

Glenn R. Mueller, Ph.D. Professor University of Denver. Franklin L. Burns School of Real Estate & Construction Management & Dividend Capital Research

U.S. Office Snapshot Q1 2016

Trends l%etropolitan America, 1

STATE OF UTAH "BEST VALUE" COOPERATIVE CONTRACT CONTRACT NUMBER: AR2270 November 14, 2016

University of Denver. Dividend Capital Research

MARKETBEAT U.S. Industrial

MARKETBEAT U.S. Industrial

World Class Airport For A World Class City

2012 Airport Ground Transportation

Hotel Valuation and Transaction Trends For the U.S. Lodging Industry

At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the following:

World Class Airport For A World Class City

Glenn R. Mueller, Ph.D. Professor University of Denver. Franklin L. Burns School of Real Estate & Construction Management &

MARKETBEAT U.S. Industrial

MARKETBEAT U.S. Industrial

2016 Air Service Updates

World Class Airport For A World Class City

OBSERVERS. We shall not be moved NAACP. national Convention. advance registration form. 104 th ANNUAL CONVENTION

16,000 50,000 WALKATHON CITIES WALKERS MILES

Strategic Central Florida Location Big Bend Road & U.S. Highway 41

NBA - FRI DEC 7, 2018 TEAMS OL F

MARKETBEAT U.S. Shopping Center Q4 2018

Communicating the Importance of Seaports. Bringin It Home. Presented to AAPA Annual Convention Galveston, TX October 27, 2009

International Convention Badges

Transcription:

Monthly Employment Watch: Milwaukee and the Nation's Largest Cities A monthly report on employment trends in the nation s largest cities Prepared by: The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Center for Economic Development September, 2007 For further information contact: Professor Marc V. Levine Telephone: 414-229-6155 E-Mail: veblen@uwm.edu

Each month, the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Center for Economic Development, drawing on data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, monitors employment trends in Milwaukee and the nation s fifty largest cities. In addition, the Center also compares employment trends in Milwaukee to a smaller and more directly comparable group of peer cities, the twenty largest cities of the Northeast-Midwest Frostbelt region. Each month, the data compiled by the Center display year-over-year total employment for three different time periods: a) the most recent year (2006-2007); b) the past three years (2004-2007); and since 2000. By looking at three different time periods, and two different samples of cities, we hope to provide a fuller sense of how Milwaukee s employment growth stacks up against other big cities over time, and how Milwaukee s position has changed over time. The most recent monthly employment data for cities () reveal that in the last year the number of employed residents in the city of Milwaukee increased by 2,191, or 0.9%. This places Milwaukee 39 th among the nation s 50 largest cities in rate of employment growth over the past year (Table 1), and 10 th among the nation s 20 largest Frostbelt cities (Table 4). These rankings represent improvements from June, when Milwaukee ranked 42 nd among the 50 largest cities, and 11 th in the Frostbelt. Since 2004, employment in Milwaukee has increased by 3,212 (1.3%), placing the city 46 th among the nation s 50 largest cities (Table 2) and 13 th among the 20 largest Frostbelt cities (Table 5) during this time period. These rankings remain unchanged since June. Clearly, although employment has increased in Milwaukee since 2004, the pace of growth remains much less robust than in most big cities, both in the nation as a whole as well as in the Frostbelt. Moreover, the improvements of recent years have not compensated for the massive employment loss experienced in Milwaukee since 2000. Since 2000, Milwaukee s employment has declined by 16,092, or 6.0%. This decline places Milwaukee 46 th among the nation s 50 largest cities in employment growth since 2000 (Table 3), and 18 th among the 20 largest Frostbelt cities (Table 6).

Table 1: Employment Growth in the Nation s Fifty Largest Cities: 2006-2007 Rank City 2006 2007 %change 1 Las Vegas 272,006 283,510 4.2% 2 Tucson 243,960 254,135 4.2% 3 Seattle 342,985 355,437 3.6% 4 Wichita 179,333 185,781 3.6% 5 Phoenix 793,896 821,884 3.5% 6 Mesa City (AZ) 241,226 249,730 3.5% 7 Miami 159,492 164,802 3.3% 8 Nashville 303,205 312,976 3.2% 9 Jacksonville 391,987 404,063 3.1% 10 Memphis 296,620 305,684 3.1% 11 Atlanta 210,906 217,294 3.0% 12 Denver 295,959 304,917 3.0% 13 Albuquerque 251,509 258,458 2.8% 14 Austin 394,276 404,114 2.5% 15 Houston 948,772 970,879 2.3% 16 Charlotte 324,699 332,073 2.3% 17 San Francisco 403,712 412,818 2.3% 18 El Paso 233,517 238,403 2.1% 19 Kansas City 224,086 228,704 2.1% 20 Oklahoma City 252,048 257,142 2.0% 21 Long Beach 221,105 225,534 2.0% 22 Los Angeles 1,784,627 1,820,374 2.0% 23 Louisville 342,267 349,042 2.0% 24 Omaha 219,800 224,011 1.9% 25 Sacramento 202,828 206,697 1.9% 26 Virginia Beach 221,730 225,914 1.9% 27 Fort Worth 288,996 293,940 1.7% 28 San Jose 416,483 423,583 1.7% 29 Columbus 396,738 403,201 1.6% 30 Colorado Springs 206,041 209,315 1.6% 31 Dallas 577,669 585,892 1.4% 32 Chicago 1,271,168 1,288,317 1.3% 33 St. Louis 149,126 151,091 1.3% 34 Boston 276,561 280,194 1.3% 35 Portland 283,261 286,716 1.2% 36 Oakland 179,916 181,968 1.1% 37 San Diego 650,228 656,262 0.9% 38 San Antonio 585,810 591,168 0.9% 39 Milwaukee 250,568 252,759 0.9% 40 Philadelphia 590,869 593,665 0.5% 41 Honolulu 439,660 441,687 0.5% 42 Detroit 317,659 317,974 0.1% 43 Minneapolis 212,871 212,936 0.0% 44 Tulsa 202,297 202,288 0.0% 45 Washington, D.C. 304,827 303,922-0.3% 46 Baltimore 264,847 263,982-0.3% 47 New York 3,635,872 3,623,639-0.3% 48 Fresno 208,877 208,039-0.4% 49 Indianapolis 419,230 416,340-0.7% 50 Cleveland 179,331 177,563-1.0%

Table 2: Employment Growth in the Nation s Fifty Largest Cities: 2004-2007 Rank City 2004 2007 % change 1 Mesa City (AZ) 223,142 249,730 11.9% 2 Phoenix 734,381 821,884 11.9% 3 Atlanta 196,195 217,294 10.8% 4 Fort Worth 265,510 293,940 10.7% 5 Miami 149,662 164,802 10.1% 6 Seattle 323,195 355,437 10.0% 7 Albuquerque 235,690 258,458 9.7% 8 Jacksonville 369,335 404,063 9.4% 9 Memphis 280,351 305,684 9.0% 10 Charlotte 306,783 332,073 8.2% 11 Wichita 173,098 185,781 7.3% 12 Nashville 291,736 312,976 7.3% 13 Colorado Springs 195,540 209,315 7.0% 14 Denver 285,006 304,917 7.0% 15 San Antonio 553,819 591,168 6.7% 16 Tucson 238,496 254,135 6.6% 17 Las Vegas 268,492 283,510 5.6% 18 Sacramento 196,265 206,697 5.3% 19 Honolulu 419,512 441,687 5.3% 20 Louisville 331,599 349,042 5.3% 21 Long Beach 214,296 225,534 5.2% 22 Los Angeles 1,729,668 1,820,374 5.2% 23 San Jose 403,701 423,583 4.9% 24 Washington, D.C. 290,319 303,922 4.7% 25 Virginia Beach 216,227 225,914 4.5% 26 Chicago 1,234,076 1,288,317 4.4% 27 Omaha 214,734 224,011 4.3% 28 Columbus 387,332 403,201 4.1% 29 Austin 388,817 404,114 3.9% 30 New York 3,489,055 3,623,639 3.9% 31 San Francisco 397,662 412,818 3.8% 32 Portland 276,757 286,716 3.6% 33 Fresno 201,248 208,039 3.4% 34 San Diego 635,198 656,262 3.3% 35 Kansas City 221,450 228,704 3.3% 36 Tulsa 196,266 202,288 3.1% 37 Oklahoma City 249,620 257,142 3.0% 38 Baltimore 256,927 263,982 2.7% 39 El Paso 232,583 238,403 2.5% 40 Oakland 177,550 181,968 2.5% 41 Philadelphia 583,900 593,665 1.7% 42 Dallas 576,943 585,892 1.6% 43 Houston 956,138 970,879 1.5% 44 Boston 276,491 280,194 1.3% 45 Indianapolis 410,889 416,340 1.3% 46 Milwaukee 249,547 252,759 1.3% 47 Minneapolis 211,038 212,936 0.9% 48 St. Louis 150,411 151,091 0.5% 49 Detroit 321,818 317,974-1.2% 50 Cleveland 181,214 177,563-2.0%

Table 3: Employment Growth in the Nation s Fifty Largest Cities: 2000-2007 Rank City 2000 2007 % change 1 Phoenix 655,518 821,884 25.4% 2 Mesa City (AZ) 199,180 249,730 25.4% 3 Las Vegas 230,854 283,510 22.8% 4 Fort Worth 255,724 293,940 14.9% 5 Sacramento 180,622 206,697 14.4% 6 San Antonio 519,368 591,168 13.8% 7 Tucson 223,896 254,135 13.5% 8 Albuquerque 228,833 258,458 12.9% 9 Atlanta 193,134 217,294 12.5% 10 San Diego 584,717 656,262 12.2% 11 Colorado Springs 187,253 209,315 11.8% 12 Virginia Beach 202,778 225,914 11.4% 13 Miami 148,383 164,802 11.1% 14 Charlotte 299,015 332,073 11.1% 15 Seattle 321,271 355,437 10.6% 16 El Paso 218,897 238,403 8.9% 17 Jacksonville 372,732 404,063 8.4% 18 Fresno 192,303 208,039 8.2% 19 Wichita 172,600 185,781 7.6% 20 Los Angeles 1,700,872 1,820,374 7.0% 21 Long Beach 210,729 225,534 7.0% 22 Houston 911,524 970,879 6.5% 23 Honolulu 415,358 441,687 6.3% 24 Omaha 210,996 224,011 6.2% 25 New York 3,469,315 3,623,639 4.4% 26 Oklahoma City 246,341 257,142 4.4% 27 Austin 387,532 404,114 4.3% 28 Memphis 294,416 305,684 3.8% 29 Columbus 389,922 403,201 3.4% 30 Nashville 303,510 312,976 3.1% 31 Denver 296,613 304,917 2.8% 32 Washington, D.C. 297,421 303,922 2.2% 33 Kansas City 228,099 228,704 0.3% 34 Indianapolis 415,378 416,340 0.2% 35 Louisville 349,841 349,042-0.2% 36 Tulsa 202,807 202,288-0.3% 37 Baltimore 266,164 263,982-0.8% 38 Dallas 592,703 585,892-1.1% 39 Philadelphia 602,584 593,665-1.5% 40 Chicago 1,316,078 1,288,317-2.1% 41 Oakland 186,510 181,968-2.4% 42 Portland 293,896 286,716-2.4% 43 Minneapolis 219,574 212,936-3.0% 44 St. Louis 156,690 151,091-3.6% 45 Boston 296,111 280,194-5.4% 46 Milwaukee 268,851 252,759-6.0% 47 Cleveland 192,090 177,563-7.6% 48 San Francisco 456,996 412,818-9.7% 49 Detroit 353,727 317,974-10.1% 50 San Jose 478,178 423,583-11.4%

Table 4: Employment Growth in the Twenty Largest Frostbelt Cities 2006-2007 Rank City 2006 2007 % change 1 Wichita 179,333 185,781 3.6% 2 Houston 948,772 970,879 2.3% 3 Kansas City 224,086 228,704 2.1% 4 Omaha 219,800 224,011 1.9% 5 Columbus 396,738 403,201 1.6% 6 Chicago 1,271,168 1,288,317 1.3% 7 Cincinnati 147,276 149,233 1.3% 8 St. Louis 149,126 151,091 1.3% 9 Boston 276,561 280,194 1.3% 10 Milwaukee 250,568 252,759 0.9% 11 Philadelphia 590,869 593,665 0.5% 12 Detroit 317,659 317,974 0.1% 13 Minneapolis 212,871 212,936 0.0% 14 St.Paul, (MN) 142,704 142,747 0.0% 15 Washington, D.C. 304,827 303,922-0.3% 16 Baltimore 264,847 263,982-0.3% 17 New York 3,635,872 3,623,639-0.3% 18 Buffalo 117,379 116,728-0.6% 19 Indianapolis 419,230 416,340-0.7% 20 Cleveland 179,331 177,563-1.0% Table 5: Employment Growth in the Twenty Largest Frostbelt Cities 2004-2007 Rank City 2004 2007 % change 1 Wichita 173,098 185,781 7.3% 2 Washington, D.C. 290,319 303,922 4.7% 3 Chicago 1,234,076 1,288,317 4.4% 4 Omaha 214,734 224,011 4.3% 5 Columbus 387,332 403,201 4.1% 6 New York 3,489,055 3,623,639 3.9% 7 Kansas City 221,450 228,704 3.3% 8 Baltimore 256,927 263,982 2.7% 9 Philadelphia 583,900 593,665 1.7% 10 Houston 956,138 970,879 1.5% 11 Boston 276,491 280,194 1.3% 12 Indianapolis 410,889 416,340 1.3% 13 Milwaukee 249,547 252,759 1.3% 14 Cincinnati 147,343 149,233 1.3% 15 Minneapolis 211,038 212,936 0.9% 16 St.Paul, (MN) 141,791 142,747 0.7% 17 St. Louis 150,411 151,091 0.5% 18 Buffalo 117,156 116,728-0.4% 19 Detroit 321,818 317,974-1.2% 20 Cleveland 181,214 177,563-2.0%

Table 6: Employment Growth in the Twenty Largest Frostbelt Cities 2000-2007 Rank City 2000 2007 %change 1 Wichita 172,600 185,781 7.6% 2 Houston 911,524 970,879 6.5% 3 Omaha 210,996 224,011 6.2% 4 New York 3,469,315 3,623,639 4.4% 5 Columbus 389,922 403,201 3.4% 6 Washington, D.C. 297,421 303,922 2.2% 7 Kansas City 228,099 228,704 0.3% 8 Indianapolis 415,378 416,340 0.2% 9 Baltimore 266,164 263,982-0.8% 10 Philadelphia 602,584 593,665-1.5% 11 Chicago 1,316,078 1,288,317-2.1% 12 Cincinnati 152,993 149,233-2.5% 13 Minneapolis 219,574 212,936-3.0% 14 Buffalo 120,688 116,728-3.3% 15 St. Louis 156,690 151,091-3.6% 16 St.Paul, (MN) 149,468 142,747-4.5% 17 Boston 296,111 280,194-5.4% 18 Milwaukee 268,851 252,759-6.0% 19 Cleveland 192,090 177,563-7.6% 20 Detroit 353,727 317,974-10.1%