Trails Design and Management Handbook

Similar documents
The Chu property is a 6.57 acre parcel located in the Town of Superior on the west side of McCaslin Boulevard. In 2014, the Town of Superior acquired

City of Durango 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT

Longmont to Boulder Regional Trail Jay Road Connection DRAFT FINAL REPORT

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE

Blueways: Rivers, lakes, or streams with public access for recreation that includes fishing, nature observation, and opportunities for boating.

BACKCOUNTRY TRAIL FLOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM

Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance

Chapter 6: POLICY AND PROCEDURE RECOMMENDATIONS

Dufferin Jog Elimination Project

Rural Rustic Road Program

APPENDIX D: SUSTAINABLE TRAIL DESIGN. APPENDICES Town of Chili Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update

FEASIBILITY CRITERIA

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT May 10, Members of the Planning Commission. Joyce Parker-Bozylinski, Contract Planner

MORGAN CREEK GREENWAY Final Report APPENDICES

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Merced Wild and Scenic River. Comprehensive Management Plan, Yosemite National Park, Madera and Mariposa

Port Gamble Shoreline Area Conceptual Trail Proposal

Trail # NW Tuesday, June DESIGN. Provide an Review the Provide an. Project Goals: System system. wayfinding

Hermosa Area Preservation The Colorado Trail Foundation 4/11/2008

Blue River Trail Master Plan JSA to Town Hall June 2004

RE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan, Preliminary Ideas and Concepts

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation June 5, 2008 GUALALA BLUFF TRAIL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation September 22, 2011 BAY AREA RIDGE TRAIL: HOOD MOUNTAIN TO HIGHWAY 12

Bear Creek Habitat Improvement Project

America s Great Outdoors: Feasibility Study for Connecting Urban Refuges to the Rocky Mountain Greenway Trail Network

Mt. Hood National Forest

Tallahassee-St. Marks Historic Railroad Trail

RUSHMORE CONNECTOR TRAIL PROPOSAL

Becker County Trail Routing Feasibility Study

MESA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Administration - Building - Engineering Road and Bridge Traffic - Planning - Solid Waste Management

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Understanding user expectations And planning for long term sustainability 1

A CASE FOR COMPLETING THE JORDAN RIVER PARKWAY: A

Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road

Georgetown-Lewes Rail/Trail Study. Rail/Trail Study: Cool Spring to Cape Henlopen State Park New Road Extension (House Resolution No.

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

AGENDA BILL. David Wilbrecht, Town Manager Stuart Brown, Recreation Manager

Securing Permanent Protection for Public Land

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETED SEGMENTS OF THE NORTH COUNTRY NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL

2. Goals and Policies. The following are the adopted Parks and Trails Goals for Stillwater Township:

National Forests and Grasslands in Texas

Shelf Road Recreation Area 2015 BLM Annual Report of Rocky Mountain Field Institute Stewardship Under BLM Agreement L12AC20483 November 19, 2015

Appendix 3. Greenway Design Standards. The Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan

AGENDA ITEM 5 D WAKULLA ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE (WEI) TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY

MPRB: Southwest LRT Community Advisory Committee Issues and Outcomes by Location Current to: 12 November 2010

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET

At the time, the portion of the line through Eagle County remains wholly under the ownership of Union Pacific Railroad (UP).

Section II. Planning & Public Process Planning for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail began in 2010 as a City of Minnetrista initiative.

European Aviation Safety Agency 1 Sep 2008 OPINION NO 03/2008. of 1 September 2008

Auburn Trail / Ontario Pathways Trail Connector Feasibility Study Public Information Meeting Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Macleod Trail Corridor Study. Welcome. Macleod Trail Corridor Study Open House. Presentation of Proposed Design Concepts

CHAPTER III: TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS & PERMITS

Buena Vista Community Trails Plan

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

Flow Stand Up Paddle Board Parkway Plan Analysis

ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL

The Vision for the San Juan Islands Scenic Byway

CHAPTER 4 -- THE LAND USE PLAN: DESCRIPTIONS AND POLICIES FOR THIRTEEN PLANNING AREAS

Business Item No

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation December 2, 2004 COYOTE HELLYER COUNTY PARK BAY AREA RIDGE TRAIL

Assessing Your Trails, Keeping Them Safe and Enjoyable

National Recreation Trail Application for Designation

2. STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK // What We Heard

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

Project Planning, Compliance, and Funding

Baker/Carver Regional Trail master plan public review draft

Worksheet: Resolving Trail Use(r) Conflict March 27, 2010

Parkland County Municipal Development Plan Amendment Acheson Industrial Area Structure Plan

Land Management Summary

Economic Development and Tourism

Rogue River Access and Management Plan Draft Alternatives

FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands

Business Item No XXX. Proposed Action That the Metropolitan Council approve the Coon Creek Regional Trail Master Plan.

Procedure for the Use of Power-Driven Mobility Devices on Mass Audubon Sanctuaries 1 September 17, 2012

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FALL Introduction. Findings

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM

The Baker/Carver Regional Trail is intended to

Provincial Railway Technical Standards

K SIGNAGE & TRAFFIC CONTROL. Table of Contents

Minimum Requirements References in National Park Service Policy

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

Peter Axelson. Beneficial Designs, Inc. Minden, NV

Index. Index.1 M I N N E S O T A D E P A R T M E N T O F N A T U R A L R E S O U R C E S

Lake Apopka Trail Loop Design Guidelines

Committee Report. Community Development Committee For the Metropolitan Council meeting of August 12, Business Item No.

RATTLESNAKE HILL PHILLIPS, HARRIS FARM, LIME KILN & QUARRY

NATIONAL AIRSPACE POLICY OF NEW ZEALAND

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

Bayview Escarpment. Interim Management Statement

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

LAND USE GUIDELINES NEW TOWN

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land

Level Crossings Configuration Standards

APPENDIX I STANDARD CONSULTATION PROTOCOL FOR TRAVEL MANAGEMENT ROUTE DESIGNATION

Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission Designation Application

CHAPTER FIVE PROSPECTS FOR FUTURE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

PURPOSE AND NEED (CONCURRENCE POINT 1) NEW CANADA ROAD PROJECT FROM STATE ROUTE 1 (U.S. HIGHWAY 70) TO U.S. INTERSTATE 40

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NOS: 5.A, 5.B STAFF: MICHAEL SCHULTZ

Decision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation

Little River Trail Feasibility Study

Madison Metro Transit System

Transcription:

Trails Design and Management Handbook OPEN SPACE PITKIN AND TRAILS COUNTY Open Space and Tr ails Progr am Pitkin County, Color ado Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Program Trails Design and Management Planning Handbook

OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS PI T KI N C O U N T Y Open Space and Tr ails Progr am Pitkin County, Color ado Trails Design and Management Handbook Revision 1.1 January 20, 1994 Ported to contemporary page layout software November 2007. No content changes. p r e p a r e d b y Natureshape Troy Scott Parker 8285 Kincross Drive Boulder, Colorado 80301 usa tsparker@natureshape.com www.natureshape.com 303-530-1785

Contents Table of Contents Foreword xi Acknowledgements xiii INTRODUCTION The Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Program xv Trail Design and Management Planning ix The Complete Trail Approval Process x Section 1 Trail Design Process and Guidelines 1-1 A. Why Have A Trail Here? 1-1 B. Trail Purpose 1-2 C. Users, Usage Levels, and User Conflicts 1-2 D. Trail Type and Width 1-3 E. General Trail Corridor Guidelines 1-5 F. Working With Property Lines and Densely Developed Areas 1-7 G. Trail Corridor Selection Process 1-8 H. General Trail and Corridor Design 1-8 I. Relationship Between Trail and Site 1-10 J. Safety and Human Aspects 1-12 K. Construction 1-13 L. Maintenance 1-13 M. Stewardship 1-14 Details of Working with Property Lines and Densely Developed Areas 1-16 Best Case A Long-Established Boundary 1-16 Second Best Case A Route Between Two Very Different Land Uses 1-16 Middle Case A Highway Right-of-Way 1-16 Second-to-Worst Case Hemmed-in Development Trail 1-18 Worst Case Between Highway and Development 1-18 Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Program Trails Design and Management Planning Handbook iii

t a b l e o f c o n t e n t s Section 2 Hard Surface Multiple Use Trail Specifications 2-1 Usage and Site Parameters 2-2 Usage Parameters 2-2 Site Parameters 2-2 User Types 2-2 Corridor Selection and Width 2-4 Minimum Final and Construction Easement Widths 2-5 Grades, Sightlines, Curve Radii, and Vertical Clearance 2-6 Grades 2-6 Sightlines 2-6 Curve Radii 2-6 Vertical Clearance 2-6 Hazard Zones and Side Clearance 2-7 Hazard Zones 2-7 Side Clearance 2-7 Constricted Trail Width 2-9 Use of Curves in Alignment 2-10 Use of Grades in Alignment 2-11 Switchbacks 2-12 Intersections Between Multiple Use Hard Surface Paths 2-13 Hard Surface Materials: Concrete and Asphalt 2-14 Concrete versus Asphalt 2-14 Concrete and Asphalt Maintenance 2-16 Concrete Path Specifications 2-18 Objectives for Concrete Path Surfaces 2-18 Initial Grade Preparation 2-18 Subgrade Preparation 2-18 Specifications for Concrete Work 2-19 Asphalt Path Specifications 2-23 Initial Grade Preparation 2-23 Subgrade Classification 2-23 Selecting the Appropriate Specification 2-23 General Specifications for All Asphalt Work 2-24 Hard Surface Trail Cross Sections 2-26 Minimal Cross Slopes 2-26 Cut/Fill Construction 2-27 Grading Specifications 2-27 Full Bench Construction 2-29 Superelevation 2-31 Path Drainage 2-32 Underpasses 2-35 iv Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Program Trails Design and Management Planning Handbook

t a b l e o f c o n t e n t s Grade Crossings 2-40 Grade Crossing Details 2-42 Trailheads 2-44 Design Guidelines for All Trailheads 2-44 Trailheads With Parking 2-50 Summary of Design Guidelines 2-50 Trailheads Without Parking 2-52 Grade Crossings 2-53 Trailheads for Other Agencies 2-54 Bridges 2-55 Bridges Versus Other Options 2-55 Aesthetic Issues in Selecting a Bridge Design 2-55 Bridge Types 2-55 Selecting a Bridge Type 2-55 Bridge Alignment 2-56 Bridge Abutments and Piers 2-56 Standard Wooden Bridge 2-59 General Planning Sequence 2-59 General Materials and Construction Notes 2-59 Standard Steel Truss Bridges 2-64 Manufacturers 2-64 Bridge Design Factors 2-64 Signs 2-66 General Sign Standards 2-66 Regulatory Signs on Trails 2-67 Regulatory Signs For Vehicles at Trailheads and on Roads 2-67 Informational Signs on Trails and at Trailheads 2-67 Regulatory Signs on Trails 2-69 Regulatory Signs for Motorized Vehicles on Roads and at Trailheads 2-73 Informational Signs on Trails and at Trailheads 2-74 Retaining Walls 2-83 Stone Retaining Walls 2-83 Timber Retaining Walls 2-85 Other Types of Retaining Walls 2-86 Railings 2-87 Fences 2-91 Boundary Fencing 2-91 Circulation Control 2-92 Bulletin Boards 2-93 Adjacent Soft Surface Trails 2-94 Boardwalk 2-99 Design Features for Boardwalks 2-101 Materials Specification 2-103 Boardwalk Maintenance 2-104 Type 1 Boardwalk 2-105 Type 2 Boardwalk 2-112 Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Program Trails Design and Management Planning Handbook v

t a b l e o f c o n t e n t s Site Preservation, Restoration, and Revegetation 2-114 Site Preservation 2-114 Site Restoration 2-115 Site Revegetation 2-116 Trail Closure 2-117 Features for the Physically Challenged 2-118 Equestrian Trails 2-120 General 2-120 Equestrian trail maintenance 2-120 Criteria for determining equestrian access 2-120 Nordic Trails 2-121 General 2-121 Factors in Determining Nordic Use of Regular Trails 2-121 Hard Surface Multiple Use Trail Maintenance 2-122 Inspection, Maintenance, and Preventive Maintenance Checklist 2-122 Hard Surface Trail Inspection and Maintenance Schedule 2-124 First Year 2-124 Each Subsequent Year 2-124 Notes on Maintenance Beyond the Second Year 2-125 Section 3 Crusher Fines Surface Trail Specifications 3-1 Usage and Site Parameters 3-2 Usage Parameters 3-2 Site Parameters 3-2 User Types 3-2 Crusher Fines Characteristics 3-4 Specification and Testing of Crusher Fines 3-6 Specification 3-6 Testing 3-6 Cost and Estimation of Quantity 3-7 Overview of Crusher Fines Trail Types 3-8 Type 1: Bike Path 3-8 Type 2: Primarily Pedestrian With Bicycle and/or Wheelchair Access 3-9 Type 3: Pedestrian Only 3-9 Crusher Fines Type 1: Bike Paths 3-10 Grades 3-10 Drainage Features 3-11 Curves 3-12 Sightlines 3-12 Hazard Zones and Side Clearance 3-12 Vertical Clearance 3-12 Superelevation 3-13 vi Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Program Trails Design and Management Planning Handbook

t a b l e o f c o n t e n t s Crusher Fines Type 2: Primarily Pedestrian With Bicycle and/or Wheelchair Access 3-14 Grades 3-14 Drainage Features 3-15 Curves 3-16 Sightlines 3-16 Hazard Zones 3-16 Side Clearance 3-17 Vertical Clearance 3-17 Crusher Fines Type 3: Pedestrian Only 3-18 Grades and Alignment 3-18 Drainage Features 3-19 Curves and Sightlines 3-20 Hazard Zones 3-20 Side Clearance 3-21 Vertical Clearance 3-21 Crusher Fines Trail Cross Sections 3-22 Minimal Cross Slope 3-22 Cut/Fill Construction 3-24 Grading Specifications 3-24 Full Bench Construction 3-26 Crusher Fines Trail Drainage 3-27 Outslope 3-27 Crowning 3-28 Superelevation 3-28 Side Swales and Culverts 3-29 Grade Breaks 3-30 Drainage Dips 3-32 Swale Crossings 3-35 Causeway and Channelization 3-37 Stepping Stones 3-38 Steps 3-39 Crusher Fines Path Construction Methods 3-43 Initial Grade Preparation 3-43 Selecting a Trail Construction Method 3-43 Installation of the Crusher Fines Surface 3-44 Crusher Fines Trails for the Physically Challenged 3-49 Accessibility and Application 3-49 Crusher Fines Trail Maintenance 3-51 Inspection, Maintenance, and Preventive Maintenance Checklist 3-51 Crusher Fines Trail Inspection and Maintenance Schedule 3-53 First Year 3-53 Each Subsequent Year 3-53 Notes on Maintenance Beyond the Second Year 3-54 Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Program Trails Design and Management Planning Handbook vii

t a b l e o f c o n t e n t s Section 4 Trail Proposal and Evaluation Process 4-1 How to Propose a New Trail 4-1 A. General Information 4-2 B. Mapping 4-2 C. Trail Corridor Guidelines 4-3 D. Existing Trail Conditions Audit 4-3 E. General Trail and Corridor Design 4-3 F. Relationship Between Trail and Site 4-4 G. Safety and Human Aspects 4-4 H. Construction 4-5 I. Maintenance 4-5 J. Stewardship 4-5 Appendix a Adoption of General Objectives and Policies A-1 Appendix b Open Space and Trails General Objectives and Policies A-3 Introduction A-3 Acquisitions A-3 Stewardship A-4 Advocacy A-5 Performance and Efficiency A-5 Public Support A-6 Appendix c References A-7 viii Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Program Trails Design and Management Planning Handbook

Foreword At its best, a trail is a unique extension of its site. Much more than merely a connection between two points, a trail can create a safe and sustainable corridor through the site which brings visitors into the site s natural features. A trail can be subtly integrated into its site such that it feels like it belongs there complementing the site with its presence and in the process making us feel as if we, too, belong there. And the best trails provide a rich combination of landscape, visual and sensory experiences, intellectual discoveries, and emotions and feelings that continually makes them enjoyable to use, time and time again. Trails such as this usually don t just happen. They are designed to be sustainable, to bring visitors in contact with the site to be enjoyable to use. This specification is intended as a first step in creating such trails as part of a state-of-the-art trail system especially suited to Pitkin County s environment, residents, and visitors. Goals of this Specification This specification is designed to help produce unique trails that are uniquely suited to their sites and users. At the same time, it is intended to provide a recognizable design consistency between trails and to eliminate the need to start from scratch with every trail. As outlined in these pages, the trail design process begins with a thorough examination intended to reveal the dozens of interrelated aspects that together shape trail planning and management. Extensive guidelines are given for relating these aspects in a balance that resolves the many natural and man-made forces operating on a given trail. This specification then gives planning and construction details for various common trail features, along with design and aesthetic issues for creating a quality trail experience. Designs for trail surfaces and drainage are based on the best of both time-proven methods and on state-of-the-art methods. Designs for structures, signs, and trailside features are largely based on the mining and ranching heritage of Pitkin County, as well as on the character of the mountain and valley landscape. Realizing that all sites and trails are unique, this specification often gives a great deal of flexibility in trail design. Nearly all trail features can be built in more than one way, and guidelines are given for choosing between various methods. To further create flexibility, the word should is used much more often than shall. Except where the physical stability of the trail or the safety of users would be compromised, the spirit of this specification should be considered more important than the letter. This specification can and should be extended as needed. Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Program Trails Design and Management Planning Handbook ix

F o r e w o r d All parts of the trail system are designed to be cost-effective with low maintenance. Quality design and construction, combined with frequent inspections and light maintenance, are intended to prevent major problems. The Character of the Trails Trails designed through this specification are intended to have a sturdy grounded feel to feel as if they are integral parts of their neighborhoods and sites. Simple lines, heavy square timbers, practical unembellished designs, and the use of natural materials such as native stone, wood, crushed stone, and linseed oil wood treatment are intended to evoke an unpretentious solid western feeling for both residents and visitors. The desired feeling is a simple elegance resulting from the blending of effective design, solid practicality, native materials, and careful craftsmanship. Natural materials are favored over high-tech or man-made materials, but the latest in technology is employed where appropriate. Site preservation, restoration, and revegetation efforts are designed to integrate trails with both sites and neighborhoods. It is hoped that combining these design guidelines with respect for natural resource values will produce a trail system that becomes an important and eagerlysupported part of life in Pitkin County. May you be able to enjoy many years of good trail experiences. Troy Scott Parker June 1993 x Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Program Trails Design and Management Planning Handbook

Acknowledgements The author gratefully acknowledges the many individuals and organizations that assisted with this specification. First, thanks to Mark Fuller and the Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Program for having the foresight to commission this work. The basic concept for developing this specification came largely from Park City, Utah, in their Trails Master Plan Update dated April 1992, from the City of Aspen, Colorado, Pedestrian Walkway and Bikeway System, and from other communities whose trail systems and planning work helped to show the way. Editing assistance was gratefully provided by Hugh Duffy of the Rivers, Trails, and Conservation Assistance Program of the National Park Service, Rocky Mountain Division. Stuart Macdonald, Colorado State Trails Coordinator, was very helpful in providing supporting materials and literature. Ron Henderson of Henderson Concrete, Montrose, Colorado, generously provided detailed information on concrete construction, as did Dennis Erickson from the City of Montrose, Colorado, Parks and Recreation Department. Details for Type 1 boardwalk decks are derived from designs by Design Workshop, Denver, that were used in the Winter Park Outdoor Center constructed by Volunteers for Outdoor Colorado (VOC). VOC also deserves thanks for providing a proving ground for crusher fines construction techniques and for making available the Winter Park Outdoor Center design. The author would also like to thank Christopher Alexander and his colleagues for the ideas expressed in The Timeless Way of Building and A Pattern Language many of the concepts from their work are included in this specification in ways far too numerous to mention. And, last but not least, thanks to all the unnamed trail planners, contractors, builders, and others whose cumulative trail work all around the country forms the basis for much of this specification. Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Program Trails Design and Management Planning Handbook xi

INTRODUCTION The Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Program On November 4,1990, Pitkin County voters approved a citizen initiative establishing the Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Board of Trustees and authorizing the program to raise funds through a property tax and bonds. Resolution 90-93 of the Board of County Commissioners enabled the Open Space and Trails Board to establish acquisition priorities and recommend management guidleines and other relevant policies and procedures to guide the expenditure of open space and trails funds. (See Appendix B for the complete Open Space and Trails Board Objectives and Policies statement). The mission of the Open Space and Trails Program is to acquire, preserve, maintain and manage open space for multiple purposes including, but not limited to, recreational, wildlife, agricultural, access, and scenic purposes and to acquire, preserve, develop, manage and maintain trails for similar purposes. Likewise, trails dedicated to the County as a result of private land development approvals are subject to the same mission statement. Trails are an important and valued form of land use in Pitkin County. This Trails Design and Management Planning Handbook has been adopted by the Open Space and Trails Board and the Pitkin County Commissioners as an amendment to the County Trails Plan previously adopted in 1991 by Resolution 91-, replacing the Trail Guidelines section and expanding on the evaluation procedure and approval process described in Section II of that Plan. These guidelines are consistent with County Land Use Code and other relevant regulations. Trail Design and Management Planning The County has adopted guiding policies regarding trails acquisition, stewardship, and advocacy which this Trail Design and Management Handbook is designed to implement. Building and operating a quality trail system requires the appropriate, site-specific application of functional, cost-effective, low impact, and easily maintained design concepts. Every trail segment presents different physical conditions and management challenges. The implementation of design and management standards must be flexible enough to adapt to those changing needs while still achieving the overall trail objectives of the County. The County s trail stewardship practices always seek to preserve and enhance the ecological, scenic, agricultural, and cultural resources acquired through the Open Space and Trails Program or through land use approvals. Trail design and management planning are intended to help ensure that those stewardship obligations are met through a thorough planning requirement which Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Program Trails Design and Management Planning Handbook xiii

I n t r o d u c t i o n is consistently applied to each individual trail project. The trail design process seeks continuity and consistent quality, but avoids the strict application of rigid design specifications where creative adaptations of the design guidelines can achieve a superior outcome. The management planning process seeks to identify, in advance, the appropriate uses for a trail, its maintenance needs, the likely management issues, and the management resources that can be applied. Meeting the County s Trails Goals The 1991 Pitkin County Trails Plan, Section IV, states that the County s goal is to provide a pedestrian, bicycling, equestrian, fishing, and nordic trails system which is properly maintained and accessible; which provides a good trails experience to residents and visitors alike in all seasons; and which functions as an important part of the transportation system, or which provides an opportunity for the public to recreate in wilderness settings. Good trail design and appropriate management are both essential to the achievement of that goal. Further, the County recognizes that not all existing trails meet the County s goal. This document is designed to guide the County and the public through a thorough examination of good trail design and appropriate management in the course of proposing, approving, building, or upgrading the County s trail system. The Complete Trail Approval Process The development of the County trail system will occur within the context of the County s land use regulations as described in this Handbook. In order to provide the information necessary to prepare a trail proposal, this Handbook is laid out as follows: Section 1 Trail Design Process and Guidelines This section presents general design process and guidelines for all trail types. The design of trails should follow this process and meet these guidelines as much as possible. Section 2 Multiple Use Hard Surface Trail Specifications Section 3 Crusher Fines Trail Specifications Together, Sections 2 and 3 present the County s design guidelines for these trail types and for attendant trail system improvements. The goals, design concepts, recommended specifications, and anticipated maintenance needs for each trail type are presented and explained. Where a feature or concept applies to both trail types, it is presented in Section 2. Section 4 Trail Proposal and Evaluation Process This describes the step-by-step progression of a trail proposal toward County approval, whether it orginates from the private sector, from the Open Space and Trails Program, or from another entity. The requirements for proposals for new trails (and for evaluation of existing trails) are also given here. Reference Supporting reference materials are included in Appendix C. xiv Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Program Trails Design and Management Planning Handbook