A380: Designed for Airports

Similar documents
Airport Compatibility

Beijing, 18 h of September 2014 Pierre BACHELIER Head of ATM Programme. Cockpit Initiatives. ATC Global 2014

ATR-600 SERIES THE LEADING TURBOPROP

Morgan Stanley Commercial update. Morgan Stanley. Airbus Commercial Update. Mark Pearman Wright Head of Corporate & Investor Marketing

ATR THE SHORTCUT TO YOUR DESTINATION

Airport/Aircraft Compatibility Challenges on the Apron

Athens International Airport, Marketing Workshop. The Challenges facing Air Transport. John Blanchfield Director, Technical Marketing, Airbus

Airbus A320family FOPP Air Flow Deflector

Think the solution, experience the change

Stall. Review of the Fundamentals, the Procedure and the Training. Presented by Capt. Christian Norden/ Flight Crew Development

ITA Europe 2015 Keynote Speaker

Available On-Board Technologies For Runway Excursions Prevention

Towards the Future ATM

ATSAW. (Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness) Presented by Laurent VIDAL - Surveillance systems manager Support to sales & programs

Technical Press Briefing

Operational Interruption Cost Assessment Methodology

Airplane Performance. Introduction. Copyright 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Departure Noise Mitigation Review. Dr Darren Rhodes Civil Aviation Authority 18 July

Lithium Battery as Cargo

Quiet Climb. 26 AERO First-Quarter 2003 January

Air Transport Forecast & Scenarios Key drivers for Scenario building. EFONET Workshop The Hague November 21st 2008

ATR FREIGHTER VERSIONS. AN EASY CONVERSION AVAILABLE SINCE 2002, TO EXTEND ATR s

MRJ and The Future of Regional Jets

Africa, Airbus; A vision of the future

Designing for ease of future maintenance

MRO Trends: Airbus update

Airbus Commercial Update

Fuel and Flight Efficiency Services by Airbus

AP/FD TCAS and TCAP. Airborne Conflict Safety Forum Harry Nelson. A reminder and update. Month 20XX

I AO Chi h e i f E c E on o o n m o i m c i A na n ly l s y is i & P o P l o ilc i y y Se S ctio i n

Inadvertent Slide Deployments Update

Transformation in Procurement. Challenges for the Global Aircraft Industry. HAL Executives Presentation Toulouse, October 13, 2014

John Leahy Chief Operating Officer, Customers Airbus Annual Press Conference

Go-Around Procedure. Flight Instructor Seminar / Miami, May 24 th and 25 th, 2011

ACI Noise Rating Index and its applications

KSFO RNAV TO GLS DEMONSTRATION

June 9th, 2011 Runway Excursions at Landing The n 1 Global Air Safety Issue Can We Reduce this Risk Through Innovative Avionics?

Content. Study Results. Next Steps. Background

Flight control checks Flight Control Events

Perspectives on Flight Operational Efficiency and the Environment

Introduction to ROPS. Runway Overrun Prevention System. Presented by: Jerome JOURNADE ROPS Technical Manager

Environmental Assessment. Runway 14 Smart Tracking Approach Gold Coast Airport

Boeing Product Update

Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport

BDSF SPECIAL FREIGHTER CONVERSION

REPORT No.: 190NOY015. TITLE: Embraer 190 Noise Levels - Technical Substantiation for Bromma Airport Operation ATA 2200 No.

F A X. Subject : Development of Kiel Airport ( ref : your fax dated Aril 26 th, 2001 ) Dear Mr. Köhn

Maintenance Cost Estimation Method of an Aircraft Manufacturer

RAAA Annual Convention This information is property of Embraer and cannot be used or reproduced without written permission.

AIRBUS FLY-BY-WIRE A TOTAL APPROACH TO DEPENDABILITY

NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES

ICAO Initiatives on Aircraft Noise

A320 FAMILY: The most successful aircraft family. Key Figures* 20% fuel burn reduction. 5% lower airframe A320 FAMILY.

LAX Community Noise Roundtable. Aircraft Noise 101. November 12, 2014

Colombian PBN implementation: El Dorado case study

Cargo Aircraft Specifications

Introduction. Airline Economics. Copyright 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved.

ACI-NA Operations & Technical Affairs Committee March 5, 2013 St Petersburg, Florida

Noise data for the first 17 months of Boeing 787 operations at Heathrow airport

Reserved for high flyers

CDA Continuous Descent Approach

NAVBLUE: Reach for the skies

FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT (F70) Sky Canyon Dr. Murrieta, CA. Phone: Riverside FAA FSDO Complaint Line: (951)

Revised National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) Noise Abatement Departure Procedures (NADPs) Noise Compatibility Committee

(Presented by the United States)

Airport Compatibility

ICAO Air Transport Symposium

Notice for commencement of consultations on airport charges at Sofia Airport,

SFO Tailored Arrivals Environmental Analysis

JPDO Environmental Working Group Operations Standing Committee s E-Workshop

New generation aircraft in the instrument approach domain. Jean-Christophe Lair Airbus Test pilot 1 st Feb. 2017

Mr. Chairman, Members of the Committee, I am Chet Fuller, President GE Aviation

Airline Economics Airline Planning Workshop

What did people think in 1970?

Toronto Pearson Master Plan Greater Toronto Airports Authority October 4, 2017

Sustainable Aviation: Progress Update. Dr Andy Jefferson to UK ACC s June 2018

Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions AIRE

Noise Programs & NextGen Briefing. Stan Shepherd, Manager Airport Noise Programs

Runway Excursions at Landing The n 1 Source of Insurance Claims for Aviation Industry How Can We Reduce this Risk Through Innovative Avionics?

Benefits Assessment for Tailored Arrivals

Environmental Assessment. Runway 14 Runway 14 southern departures trial Gold Coast Airport

Evaluation of Alternative Aircraft Types Dr. Peter Belobaba

Development of Flight Inefficiency Metrics for Environmental Performance Assessment of ATM

Peer Review of Noise Modelling using ECAC Doc. 29 for Amsterdam Schiphol Airport. D Rhodes

Impact of a new type of aircraft on ATM

Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP)

Federal Aviation Administration DCA. By: Terry Biggio, Vice President Air Traffic Services Date: June 18, Federal Aviation Administration

Notice for commencement of consultations on airport charges at Sofia Airport,

Design Airspace (Routes, Approaches and Holds) Module 11 Activity 7. European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation

RNP AR and Air Traffic Management

Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update

Continuous Descent Arrivals (CDA) Workshop #2

MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL PUBLIC INPUT MEETING 3 RD QUARTER 2016 INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (MSP)

Air Service Potential between Africa and North America

Noise Issues. Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor

Noise Abatement Arrival Procedures at Louisville International Airport. Prof. John-Paul Clarke Georgia Institute of Technology

Environment and Climate Change Unit

Aircraft emissions. Global Man-Made GHG Emissions (%) Comparison of Aviation CO 2 Emissions vs Other Forms of Transport (%) Sections.

D8ULTRA-EFFICIENT COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT

Perth Noise Abatement Procedures - Change to Preferred Runways

Transcription:

O Hare Noise Compatibility CommissionTechnical Committee Meeting August 23, 2005 A380: Designed for Airports The Environmental Benefits Of the New Larger Aircraft Presented by Dan Cohen-Nir Program Manager, Airbus North America www.airbusnorthamerica.com

The A380 capacity change in context The revolution of 1970 707-320B to 747-100 150 pax +150% 747-100 375 pax Evolution in the 21st century 747-400 400 to A380 747-400 412 pax +35% A380 555 pax

Strong market confidence from 16 customers 10 A380 15 A380 10 A380F 12 A380 6 A380 2 A380 10 A380 41 A380 2 A380F 5 A380 5 A380F 6 A380 5 A380 4 A380 6 A380 10 A380F 10 firm A380 5 A380 5 A380 159 orders / commitments

North America welcomes the A380 ANC (2 airlines) The 11 US A380 destination airports handle 80% of all US 747 flights today 2006 / 07 Declared Destinations 2008 / 09 Declared Destinations Readiness state Ready Today Preparing, Ready at first service SFO (2 airlines) LAX (6 airlines) YVR (1 airline) ONT (1 airline) ORD (11 airline) IND (1 airline) MEM (1 airline) YYZ (1 airline) SDF (1 airline) YUL (1 airline) JFK (6 airlines) IAD (2 airlines) MIA (1 airline) Subject to change, based on current A380 customer forecast, status as at August 2005

A380 Benefits Higher capacity 35% more passengers (passenger aircraft) 29% more cargo payload (freighter aircraft) 50% more cargo volume (freighter) Massive gains in economics 15% lower cost/seat 20% lower cost/pound of cargo Longer range More payload on critical routes New non-stop markets, simplified networks Passenger comfort More space per passenger

A more spacious cross section True wide body cabin (A340+) 2-2-2 in business 73 / 185 cm wider 21 / 55 cm wider 747+ More space in ALL classes Standard containers / pallets for almost 50% more cabin floor volume

Internationally recommended balanced approach to airport noise reduction

Technology for lower noise Engines Trent 900 Airframe/Nacelles Performance GP7200 New high by-pass ratio engines Optimisation of high lift systems Acoustic treatment of nacelles Better climb performance and lower approach speed Flight Management System to optimize take-off and noise abatement procedure Half the noise energy of a 747-400

A380-800 / GP7200 Nominal Noise Status -3db = halving of noise energy Status as of October 2004 Nominal noise level (EPNdB) 108 106 104 102 100 98 96 94 92 Stage 3 Stage 3 Stage 3 747-400 and 400ER noise bands. All engine variants - based on Type certificate data sheet (TCDS) data. Objective QC4 upper limit QC2 upper limit QC1 upper limit 0-2 -4-6 -8-10 -12-14 -16-18 Cumulative vs stage 4 (EPNdB) 90-20 88 Sideline Flyover Approach London departure London arrival Cumulative vs. Stage 4-22 Half the noise of the 747-400 400 A380-800 560 t MTOW 386 t MLW, GP7200 70klb

A380 Automatic Noise Abatement Departure Procedure (NADP) For illustration only A380 has a new automated function to handle the aircraft according to a noise optimal fligth path taking into account the individual airport constraints and areas not to be exposed Real-time system allows the aircraft to follow best flight path in all all adverse ambient conditions, presented to the pilot shortly before take-off

The A380 offers better take-off and landing performance than the 747-400 A380-800 Take-off: 9,800 ft 1,800 ft less 747-400 Take-off: 11,600ft A380-800 Landing: 6900 ft 500 ft less 747-400 Shorter distances mean less noise exposure outside the airport boundaries Take-off: MTOW, Sea level, ISA+15 Landing: MLW, Sea level Landing: 7,400 ft

Noise contour comparison A380 vs. 747-400 747-400 MTOW 394t A380-800 MTOW 560t 85dB(A) Noise Contour for take-off at FRA as calculated by Lufthansa with input of Boeing and Airbus nominal noise data for same take-off conditions

A380 burns less fuel per passenger The first long-haul aircraft with less than 81 miles per gallon per passenger fuel burn* (on average 12% less than 747-400) 400) * 5,000 nm leg - Typical International Flight Profile, 555 passengers

Lower absolute emissions In addition, the A380 generates less CO 2 emissions per seat in high altitude (helping mitigate greenhouse effect)

Conclusion: The A380 double noise benefit 1 The capacity effect With 35% more capacity than the 747-400, the A380 allows airlines to cater for growth with fewer additional movements 2 The technology effect The A380 is an all new design benefiting from technological advancements in noise reduction, leading to halve the acoustic energy of a 747-400

This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of AIRBUS S.A.S. No intellectual property rights are granted by the delivery of this document or the disclosure of its content. This document shall not be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the express written consent of AIRBUS S.A.S. This document and its content shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied. The statements made herein do not constitute an offer. They are based on the mentioned assumptions and are expressed in good faith. Where the supporting grounds for these statements are not shown, AIRBUS S.A.S. will be pleased to explain the basis thereof. AN EADS JOINT COMPANY WITH BAE SYSTEMS