PROPOSED HORIZONTAL LAYOUT FILLET DESIGN FOR ENTRANCE/EXIT TAXIWAYS

Similar documents
1) Rescind the MOD (must meet the standard); 2) Issue a new MOD which reaffirms the intent of the previous MOD; 3) Issue a new MOD with revisions.

Airport Design-3 Geometric Design

4.0 AIRFIELD CAPACITY & FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

DRAFT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

Assignment 7: Airport Geometric Design Standards

CEE 5614 and CEE Aircraft Classifications. Spring 2013

Session Best Practices Amendments From Annex14, Volume I Annex 15. Runway Incursions Runway Excursions

Facility Requirements

Airport Markings and Lighting

Chapter Six ALP Drawings. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

Chapter 4 Airport Capacity Assessment and Identification of Facility Needs

AIRSIDE CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

CEE Quick Overview of Aircraft Classifications. January 2018

Chapter 4 Airport Facility Requirements

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

Appendix A - Glossary

JUNEAU RUNWAY INCURSION MITIGATION (RIM) PROGRAM JANUARY 25, 2017

INCREASING AIRPORT OPERATION SAFETY BASED ON UPDATED OR ENHANCED AIRPORT PAVEMENT MARKINGS: A CASE STUDY PAPER

TAKEOFF SAFETY ISSUE 2-11/2001. Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance

Preliminary Findings of Proposed Alternative

Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS

CATCODE ] CATCODE

FINAL REPORT. AAIU Synoptic Report No: AAIU File No: 2004/0066 Published: 20/06/05

ICAO Standards. Airfield Information Signs. ICAO Annex 14, 4th Edition Aerodrome Design and Operations

Source: Chippewa Valley Regional Airport ASOS, Period of Record

Appendix 6.1: Hazard Worksheet

ICAO Recommended Airport Signs, Runway And Taxiway Markings. COPYRIGHT JEPPESEN SANDERSON, INC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Revision Date:

print materials visit information on free live seminars, online courses, and

ADVISORY CIRCULAR ON CALCULATION OF DECLARED DISTANCES

ADVISORY CIRCULAR AC-AD-005

AERODROME LIGHTING SYSTEM

Addendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6)

APPENDIX D FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATIONS, PART 77

II. Purpose and Need. 2.1 Background

Appendix D Airfield Ongoing Projects Alternatives

ENHANCE RUNWAY SAFETY. (Presented by the Secretariat)

CESSNA CITATION IIB PW JT15D-4 INTRODUCTION. Runway Analysis provides the means to determine maximum allowable takeoff and landing weights based upon:

CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED ACTION

Aircraft Classifications. Dr. Antonio Trani and Julio Roa Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan Public Meeting March 16, 2015

APPENDIX X: RUNWAY LENGTH ANALYSIS

Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016

Airport Geometric Design Standards

Transportation Engineering -II Dr. Rajat Rastogi Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology - Roorkee

Airport Obstruction Standards

3.1 Facility Requirements Overview Airfield Facility Requirements... 1

Overview ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices for Aerodrome Mapping Data reported to AIM

Runway Incursions 3 Markings

Trick or Treat Process M

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport

The offers operators increased capacity while taking advantage of existing airport infrastructure. aero quarterly qtr_03 10

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

Summary of Committee Discussion/Questions Metropolitan Transportation Services Senior Planner Russ Owen presented this item.

CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

This advisory circular (AC) contains the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards for markings used on airport runways, taxiways, and aprons.

Airport Layout Plan Narrative Report

AERODROME MARKINGS AND SIGNALIZATION

4.0 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

RSAT RUNUP ANALYSIS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. METHODOLOGY

Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Spring 2015 Blacksburg, Virginia

CHAPTER 3 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

What's your fleet mix for design?

Morristown Municipal Airport Runway 5-23 Rehabilitation Environmental Assessment

Boeing Airplane Overview

AD 2. AERODROMES. For the ICAO location indicators used for Canadian aerodromes, refer to the following publications:

Subject: Standards for Airport Markings Date: 9/3/2010 AC No: 150/5340-1K Initiated by: AAS-100 Change:

SITE ELEVATION AMSL...Ground Elevation in feet AMSL STRUCTURE HEIGHT...Height Above Ground Level OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL...Total Overall Height AMSL

Meeting Summary ABE Master Plan Project Advisory Group (PAG) Meeting #3 August 15, Shannon Eibert, C&S Companies

1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION

Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. January 27, 2009 Blacksburg, Virginia

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

Special Modification To Standards Process for Airplane Design Group VI. The Boeing Federal Aviation Administration

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

Advisory Circular (AC)

National Transportation Safety Board Washington, D.C

Technical Advisory Committee Meeting February 29, 2016

CHAPTER 3 AIRPORT FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

Runway Excursion 2018 projects ALTA 2018

Airfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...

AERONAUTICAL SURVEYS & INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

JUNEAU RUNWAY INCURSION MITIGATION (RIM) PROGRAM. April 10 th 2017

OVERVIEW BASIC DESIGN FACTORS. Demand Determinants

Study Committee Meeting. September 2015

Airfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni

4.0 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

Assignment 3: Runway Length and EMAS Design. Aircraft Engine Remarks. CFM56-7B20/-7B22/-7B24 developing 20,000 lb of thrust at sea level

Chapter 5 Facility Requirements

Chapter 4 Facility Requirements

Facility Requirements

Speaker: Jonathan Leach - Chicago Department of Aviation & Todd Merrihew, P.E. - Jacobs Date: February 22, 2017

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Introduction

Runway and Taxiway Marking

DEPARTMENT: CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE / Name: CE2303/ Railway, Airport and Harbors Engineering 2 MARK QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Grove Field Airport Environmental Assessment

AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

Hartford-Brainard Airport Potential Runway Closure White Paper

Transcription:

PROPOSED HORIZONTAL LAYOUT FILLET DESIGN FOR ENTRANCE/EXIT TAXIWAYS INTRODUCTION The Zelienople Airport Authority (ZAA) has commenced engineering activities for the rehabilitation of Runway 17-35 to a length and width that is more suitable for actual and projected aviation operations. In rehabilitating Runway 17-35, parallel Taxiway A will have to be modified and extended. The modifications shall involve the use of FAA criteria for Entrance Taxiways and Exit Taxiways (Advisory Circular 150/5300-13A, Sections 408 and 409). The placement of taxiway entrances and exits is a required component of the runway rehabilitation and is discussed in a separate narrative. However, in determining the proper alignment of the affected taxiways, pavement geometrics must also be considered. In the Advisory Circulars, pavement geometrics for taxiway fillets vary drastically depending on design aircraft, length of curve, radius of curve, etc. The purpose of this narrative is to determine and provide rationale for proposed taxiway fillet geometrics of all taxiway segments incidental to the Runway 17-35 rehabilitation. The reasoning for the proposed designs shall be taken from FAA design criteria in conjunction with current airport data. DETERMINATION OF TAXIWAY DESIGN GROUP (TDG) The first step in determining pavement fillets is to determine the taxiway design group (TDG). In AC 150/5300-13A, Section 401, pavement fillets are determined by the undercarriage dimensions of an aircraft, most commonly by the Main Gear Width (MGW) and the Cockpit to Main Gear Distance (CMG). These two critical dimensions help define the aircraft s taxiing method and steering angles. The FAA has provided various tools to assist in determining the proper TDG (https://www.faa.gov/airports/engineering/airport_design/) and recommends using the following alternatives (in order of priority): 1. Use Appendix 1 of AC 150/5300-13A to access the FAA Aircraft Characteristic Database, locate your design aircraft and simply read the associated TDG. 2. Determine the CMG and MGW of the design aircraft from aircraft manual or other source, then use Table 4-11 and Figure 4-16 in AC 150/5300-13A. 3. Utilize the design tool spreadsheet located on the FAA s website to determine the TDG by inputting various known dimensions of the critical aircraft. Since Option 1 is most recommended, it was used to determine the TDG as follows: 1. The design aircraft was taken from Table 1 below, from the Final Runway Feasibility Study prepared for Zelienople Airport Authority by others. According to this chart, the Cessna Citation CJ3 is the highest demand of the jet aircrafts utilizing the Zelienople airport. However, airport management has determined that the Cesna Excel/XLS is the preferred design aircraft.

Table 1 - Critical Design Airplanes 2. The FAA Aircraft Characteristic Database was then accessed, the Cessna Excel/XLS and the Cessna Citation CJ3 were located, and the associated TDG found to be TDG-2 for both cases. TAXIWAY FILLETS SELECTION Once the Taxiway Design Group was determined to be TDG-2, the pavement fillets could be designed. Since the proposed alignment only contains right-angled turns, only 90 degree fillets were explored for design. AC 150/5300-13A provides Table 4-5 for TDG-2 fillet dimensions with accompanying Figure 4-13 for a right angled turn. These pages have been provided as attachments to this narrative for the reader s reference. It is important to note here that Table 4-5 is considered applicable to standard intersections. However, exit and entrance taxiways are commonly referenced as non-standard intersections. AC 150/5300-13A, Appendix 8 Taxiway Fillet Design, Section A8-3, states that, where taxiway turns are close together such that the L-1 tapers overlap, this is an indication that the design airplane would not fully straighten before the second turn. This type of turn is referred to as nonstandard and requires alternate dimensions. Since the L-1 tapers will indeed overlap in the taxiway entrances and exits for Runway 17-35, non-standard dimensions were required. These nonstandard dimensions can be found in Table 4-12 of the AC and accompany Figure 4-17 and Figure 4-19 (all attached to this narrative for reference). Therefore, using non-standard dimensions from Table 4-12 for TDG-2 fillets and following Figures 4-17 and 4-19 for reference, standard details were created for the Runway 17-35 entrance and exit taxiways. These details have been attached to this narrative as Exhibit A. CONCLUSION After thorough review of Advisory Circular design criteria and existing data for the airport, the proper and optimal taxiway fillets for Runway 17-35 can be determined. By following the recommended FAA procedure, the airport s taxiway design group can be stated as TDG-2. From there, non-standard fillet dimensions were used to create the proper geometrics for the taxiway entrances and exits to Runway 17-35.

ATTACHMENT 1 EXCERPTS FROM AC 150/5300-13A

9/28/2012 AC 150/5300-13A R-FILLET R-CL R-OUTER W-0 W-1 W-2 L-1 NOTE: RADII SHOWN ARE NOT CONCENTRIC. L-2 L-3 LEGEND: TAXIWAY TURN C L : MAIN GEAR OFFSET: NOSE GEAR OFFSET: Note: Offsets are shown in one direction, but offsets, and therefore fillets, are symmetrical. Figure 4-13. Taxiway turn - 90 degree delta 133

9/28/2012 AC 150/5300-13A FAA web site at are available in DXF format on the FAA web site at: http://www.faa.gov/airports/engineering/airport_design/. W-0 W-3 RUNWAY TO TAXIWAY SEPARATION LINE OF SYMMETRY CENTERED BETWEEN RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY CENTERLINES R-OUTER R-CL W-0 W-1 W-2 L-1 L-2 L-3 Figure 4-17. Entrance taxiway 141

9/28/2012 AC 150/5300-13A RUNWAY TAXIWAY Figure 4-19. Right-angled exit taxiway (2) High Speed Exits. Figure 4-18 illustrates a standard high-speed exit taxiway with a 30-degree angle of intersection. This figure and other drawings in DXF format showing common combinations of ADG, TDG, and runway to taxiway separation distance are available on the FAA web site at: http://www.faa.gov/airports/engineering/airport_design/. The radius of the exit from the runway should always be 1500 feet (457 m), as a pilot would not be able to discern the difference between a smaller radius and that of a standard high-speed exit, possibly resulting in excessive speed in the turn. Use Table 3-6 for an efficient high speed exit taxiway when it is necessary to include a curve for operations where the aircraft must taxi in the direction opposite from landing. In such a case, use the greater dimension based on ADG or TDG. If a back turn is necessary when the runway to taxiway separation is less than shown in Table 3-6, it is necessary to decrease the initial exit angle and/or use a radius that will require a nose gear steering angle of more than 50 degrees for longer aircraft and to increase pavement fillets. (See paragraph 406.b(1) for guidance on fillet design.) Such sharp turns may require locked wheel turns and/or differential engine thrust and result in excessive tire wear. Note that in all cases the fillet for the reverse turn is designed considering that the exit taxiway is one way. When runway capacity needs justify the additional cost, high visibility taxiway centerline lights can be added and the exit taxiway widened by doubling the TESM for the entire exit taxiway or by tapering the TESM from double at the intersection with the runway to normal at the intersection with the parallel taxiway. These design enhancements will increase pilot acceptance of an exit. They will require modeling all the critical combinations of CMG, MGW, and TESM for the TDG. Do not co-locate opposite direction high speed exit taxiways as shown 145

AC 150/5300-13A 9/28/2012 Table 4-5. Standard intersection details for TDG 2 TDG 2 Dimension (See Figure 4-13, Figure 4-14, and Figure 4-15) Δ (degrees) 30 45 60 90 120 135 150 W-0 (ft) 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 W-1 (ft) 29 35 26 26 27 26 28 W-2 (ft) 29 35 40 48 48 50 54 L-1 (ft) 192 228 183 185 192 183 194 L-2 (ft) 0 0 60 75 65 75 71 L-3 (ft) 8 14 23 48 117 170 279 R-Fillet (ft) 0 0 0 0 25 25 25 R-CL (ft) 75 75 75 60 75 75 80 R-Outer (ft) 92 92 92 77 92 92 97 Note: Values in the table are rounded to the nearest foot. 1 foot = 0.305 meters. Table 4-6. Standard intersection details for TDG 3 TDG 3 Dimension (See Figure 4-13, Figure 4-14, and Figure 4-15) Δ (degrees) 30 45 60 90 120 135 150 W-0 (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 W-1 (ft) 30 32 32 33 34 33 35 W-2 (ft) 37 42 47 54 52 55 56 L-1 (ft) 152 170 174 175 185 179 191 L-2 (ft) 50 55 65 80 65 75 65 L-3 (ft) 10 17 27 54 125 183 288 R-Fillet (ft) 0 0 0 0 25 25 25 R-CL (ft) 75 75 75 60 75 80 80 R-Outer (ft) 100 100 100 85 100 105 105 Note: Values in the table are rounded to the nearest foot. 1 foot = 0.305 meters. 136

AC 150/5300-13A 9/28/2012 Table 4-12. Dimensions for runway entrance/exit taxiways (where the two 90-degree turns are nonstandard) Dimension (see Figure 4-17) Runway Centerline to Taxiway Centerline Distance TDG 2 4 5 6 7 240 250 300 350 300 350 400 400 400 450 500 550 500 550 W-0 (ft) 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 25 25 25 37.5 37.5 37.5 37.5 37.5 41 41 W-1 (ft) 27 27 26 26 34 38 37 49 53 53 54 54 55 55 W-2 (ft) 50 50 49 49 62 77 75 84 102 105 101 99 100 99 W-3 (ft) 28 27 25 24 49 43 38 52 63 58 53 50 54 52 L-1 (ft) 190 186 185 185 288 322 316 312 414 429 432 433 394 398 L-2 (ft) 75 75 75 75 125 128 130 125 175 164 155 150 154 150 L-3 (ft) 50 50 49 49 119 77 75 84 102 92 93 93 94 93 R-Fillet 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R-CL (ft) 65 65 65 65 110 105 100 100 135 130 125 120 125 120 R-Outer 82 82 82 82 138 130 129 165 200 192 190 186 200 198 b. Configuration. The standard design of a runway entrance taxiway is at a right angle to the runway at the end of a runway where the threshold and beginning of takeoff coincide. Intersection angles of other than 90 degrees do not provide the best view of the runway and approach for a pilot at the holding position. A displaced threshold may require the holding position to be located along the parallel taxiway due to a need to keep aircraft out of the Precision Obstacle Free Zone (POFZ) and approach surfaces. This can lead to runway incursions when pilots do not expect to encounter the holding position away from its traditional location. The centerline radius and minimum fillet dimensions should comply with Table 4-3 and the subsequent seven tables for TDG 1A, 1B, etc., respectively. The outer edge of an entrance taxiway must be curved. When multiple parallel taxiways extend to the end of the runway, the outer edge of the outer parallel taxiway must be curved. c. Design. Do not design entrance taxiways to provide direct access from an apron, as shown in Figure 4-2. Instead, configure taxiways as shown in Figure 4-3. Design the entrance taxiway width based on Table 4-2. The curved outer common edge, as discussed in paragraph 408.b above, provides a visual clue to help pilots avoid landing on a parallel taxiway. Each entrance taxiway should have its own taxiway designator, markings and elevated signage. Existing entrance taxiways with non-standard design elements are to be corrected in accordance with this standard during the next capital project opportunity at that location. Designated hotspot locations should receive priority attention. Ideally, the length of the entrance taxiway should allow the longest fuselage of a TDG, at the hold line, to fully line-up perpendicular to the 142

ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A: RUNWAY 17-35 REHABILITATION ENTRANCE/EXIT TAXIWAY DETAILS

PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED 50' 75' 190' 190' 75' 50' 50' PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED 27 28 29 30 0 1 2 3 50' 27' 17.5' 17.5' 27' 50' R-OUTER = 82' 17.5' R-OUTER = 82' 120' 120' R-OUTER = 82' 28' (MODIFIED FOR EXIT FUNCTION) 17.5'(MIN. 110' 28' 0 1 2 3 RUNWAY 35 240' 75' 100' 100'75' 240' REQUIRED FOR ENTRANCE) 28' 27 28 29 30 RUNWAY 17 110' REVISIONS DATE TYPE BY CHK mdbiagio 10:46:38 AM 3/26/2019 G:\(2017)\17096 - Zelienople Municipal Airport - Shift and Rehabilitate Runway\PROJPLT\DETAILS.dgn PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED MTEN MODIFIED TAXIWAY ENTRANCE DETAIL TEN TAXIWAY ENTRANCE DETAIL -- -- 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 50' 17.5' 27' 120' 110' 240' 28' 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 RUNWAY 17-35 TEX TAXIWAY EXIT DETAIL -- 50' 75' 190' 150' R = 55' 75' 100' 12.5' R-TURN = 65' 47 48 49 50 RUNWAY 17 12.5' TAR TAXIWAY TURNAROUND DETAIL -- 55' 100' EXHIBIT A - RUNW AY 17-35 REHABILITATION: TAXIW AY DETAILS PREPARED BY: PREPARED FOR DRAWN: CHECKED: DATE: SCALE: ZELIENOPLE AIRPORT AUTHORITY 1859 ROUTE 588 ZELIENOPLE, PA 16063 PROJECT #: FIELD BOOK #: KLH SFZ APRIL 2018 AS NOTED 1 OF 1 SITUATE IN: FRANKLIN TOW NSHIP INC. BEAVER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 806 LINCOLN PLACE, BEAVER FALLS, PA 15010 17096 Z. AIRPORT SHEET NUMBER