AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA S AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING SYSTEM. (Presented by Airports Authority of India) SUMMARY

Similar documents
The Third ATS Coordination Meeting of Bay of Bengal, Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean (BOBASIO) Region Hyderabad, India, 22 nd to 24 th October 2013.

Implementation, goals and operational experiences of A-CDM system

Leveraging on ATFM and A-CDM to optimise Changi Airport operations. Gan Heng General Manager, Airport Operations Changi Airport Group

DELHI AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (DA-CDM) INDIRA GANDHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT NEW DELHI

AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT INDIA S PERSPECTIVE. Vineet Gulati GM(ATM-IPG), AAI

CANSO view on A-CDM. Case study on A-CDM at HKIA. Change management & human factors

A-CDM AT HONG KONG INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (HKIA)

REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE SINGAPORE CHANGI AIRPORT P.O. BOX 1, SINGAPORE

ASSEMBLY 39TH SESSION

ATFM IMPLEMENATION IN INDIA PROGRESS THROUGH COLLABORATION PRESENTED BY- AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

CATFM CENTRAL AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT ( C-ATFM ) INDIA. ATFM TF 1 Meeting September 2018

FAA Surface CDM. Collaborative Decision Making and Airport Operations. Date: September 25-27, 2017

Multi Nodal Regional ATFM/CDM Concept and Operational Trials Colombo 7 May 2014

Intentionally left blank

Changi Airport A-CDM Handbook

The Third ATS Coordination Meeting of Bay of Bengal, Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean (BOBASIO) Region Hyderabad, India, 22 nd to 24 th October 2013.

Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Operations Guidelines Version Date: 2017/07/21

Total Airport Management Solution DELIVERING THE NEXT GENERATION AIRPORT

International Civil Aviation Organization

ATFM IMPLEMENATION IN INDIA PROGRESS THROUGH COLLABORATION PRESENTED BY- AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

The Fourth ATS Coordination meeting of Bay of Bengal, Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean Region (BOBASIO/4) Kolkata, India, September, 2014.

[EFFECTIVE DATE: 23 AUG 2012]

INTRODUCTION OF AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (A-CDM) AT SINGAPORE CHANGI AIRPORT

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION AFI REGION AIM IMPLEMENTATION TASK FORCE. (Dakar, Senegal, 20 22nd July 2011)

2nd forum. Airport FRA. procedure

FRA CDM. Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Flight Crew Briefing FRANKFURT AIRPORT. German Harmonisation

ATM STRATEGIC PLAN VOLUME I. Optimising Safety, Capacity, Efficiency and Environment AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA DIRECTORATE OF AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

Aviation ICT Forum OCT 2014

A-CDM FOR REGIONAL AIRPORTS CONCEPT VALIDATION DOCUMENTO PÚBLICO

A-CDM Implementation: Burden or Blessing for ANSPs?

Nikolaos Papagiannopoulos. Juan Francisco García Lopez

SESAR ANNUAL DEMO WORKSHOP. Toulouse, October 2014 TOPLINK 1 & 2 Daniel MULLER, TOPLINK PM

A-CDM from the Flight Crew Perspective. Francisco Hoyas

Ultra s Experience with A-CDM

CENTRAL AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT ( C-ATFM ) INDIA CATFM. ATFM Global Symposium /22/2017 ATFM Global Symposium 2017

AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING

Integration of the Airport and the Network DPI/FUM Messages Management Overview

Follow up to the implementation of safety and air navigation regional priorities XMAN: A CONCEPT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF ATFCM CROSS-BORDER EXCHANGES

Can elements of the A-CDM milestone approach be automated? Bob Graham Head of Airport Research for Alan Marsden TAM Manager

Seen through an IATA lens A-CDM Globally

Bits to Blocks Aviation System Block Upgrades (ASBU)

Airspace Organization and Management

ECOsystem: MET-ATM integration to improve Aviation efficiency

DMAN-SMAN-AMAN Optimisation at Milano Linate Airport

NAM/CAR Regional Safety/Air Navigation/Aviation Security Implementation Matters 5.2 Effectiveness of air navigation implementation mechanisms

RECOMMENDED GUIDANCE FOR FPL AND RELATED ATS MESSAGES

PBN Implementation. Phil Rakena. PBN Implementation Programme Manager

Target Off-Block Time (TOBT)

Airport Collaborative Decision Making Michael Hoehenberger, (Munich Airport) on behalf of ACI World

Airport Collaborative Decision Making. Dublin A-CDM Operational Procedures

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (A-CDM): IATA RECOMMENDATIONS

TWENTY-SECOND MEETING OF THE ASIA/PACIFIC AIR NAVIGATION PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION REGIONAL GROUP (APANPIRG/22)

Airport-CDM Workshop. Stephane Durand Co-chair CANSO CDM sub-group International Affairs DSNA

Air Traffic Flow & Capacity Management Frederic Cuq

SIAMOS Put your airport ahead through innovation. Siemens AG All rights reserved.

Workshop. SESAR 2020 Concept. A Brief View of the Business Trajectory

November 22, 2017 ATFM Systems: The Backbone

U.S. India Aviation Cooperation Program. Air Traffic Management Training Program Update March 2009

A FOCUS ON TACTICAL ATFM. ICAO ATFM Workshop Beijing, 29 th -30 th October 2014

Seychelles Civil Aviation Authority. Telecomm & Information Services Unit

The SESAR Airport Concept

From AIS to AIM. COMSOFT AIS to AIM Lima, Peru Context and Overview Isabel Zambrano Rodriguez

GENERAL 1. What is Airport CDM? 2. What is the aim of A-CDM? 3. Why has A-CDM been implemented at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol?

Efficiency and Automation

ENVIRONMENT ACTION PLAN

Asia/Pacific Region A-CDM Planning

Traffic flow in oceanic airspace of Mumbai FIR, evaluation of FLAS and its Review

Making the World A better place to live SFO

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

On Time. Total Airspace Management. 8 th Global ATFM Conference Cancun - Mexico. 12/30/2014 Commercial-in-Confidence 1

ATC Simulators. The manufacturer of

AEROVISION AUGMENTED REALITY AIRPORTS IN 3D Young Professionals Innovation Competition Daniel Schoenberg, RS&H Jill Geboy, Jacobs Engineering Daniel

Air Transportation Optimization. Information Sharing for Global Benefits

ICAO ATFM SEMINAR. Dubai, UAE, 14 December 2016

How CFSPs work. processes, requirements, difficulties. Tuesday, June 19th, 2018 CFPSG PRESENTATION FABEC SC OPS/AOG RADISSON ZURICH AIRPORT 1

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (A-CDM)

2012 Performance Framework AFI

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR 1/19

Introduction of New CANSO Member Simon Li Director General CAD Hong Cong

The list of action items. UPDATED in ASIOACG/9 INSPIRE/5, Dubai UAE 11 th to 14 th November 2014

AVIATION ENVIRONMENT CIRCULAR 2 OF 2013

RNP AR APCH Approvals: An Operator s Perspective

AN-Conf/12-WP/162 TWELFTH THE CONFERENCE. The attached report

SOUTH AFRICA PBN NEAR TERM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PROJECT

ATFM/CDM ICAO s Perspective

Indian Ocean Strategic Partnership to Reduce Emissions (INSPIRE) Strategic Plan

Cooperative traffic management

Surveillance and Broadcast Services

IATA Carbon Offset Program

B0 FRTO, B0-NOPS, B0-ASUR and B0-ACAS Implementation in the AFI and MID Regions

SPADE-2 - Supporting Platform for Airport Decision-making and Efficiency Analysis Phase 2

KJFK Runway 13R-31L Rehabilitation ATFM Strategies

Modernising UK Airspace 2025 Vision for Airspace Tools and Procedures. Controller Pilot Symposium 24 October 2018

Asia/Pacific Air Traffic Management Perspectives

Global 8 ATFM Conference 4 6 November 2014 Cancun, Mexico

Hosted by General Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA)

Peter Sorensen Director, Europe Safety, Operations & Infrastructure To represent, lead and serve the airline industry

AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES

Transcription:

12 th Meeting of Arabian Sea-Indian Ocean ATS Coordination Group ASIOACG/12) & 8 th Meeting of Indian Ocean Strategic Partnership to Reduce Emissions (INSPIRE/8) New Delhi, India, 20-21 September 2017 Agenda Item 2: Updates from ANSPs AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA S AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING SYSTEM (Presented by Airports Authority of India) SUMMARY This paper presents an overview of Collaborative Decision Making Platform developed by Airports Authority of India and the experience in implementation of the same for Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport Mumbai. 1. INTRODUCTION ICAO Code ANSP Operator No. of Runways No. of movements No. of Passengers VABB Airports Authority of India Mumbai International Airport (Pvt) Ltd. 2 (crossing) ~320,000 per annum ~45.2 Million per annum C.S.I. Airport, Mumbai is second busiest airport in India in terms of air traffic movements. On a typical day close to 920 flights and more than 123,000 passengers arrive and depart. 1.1 Airport collaborative decision making (A-CDM) is a process that serves as a tangible solution for the problem of congestion at airports. A-CDM is an operational paradigm where the decisions are based on shared and real-time information among the main stakeholders of an airport. A-CDM emphasizes the need for collaboration among the ANSP, airport operator, airlines and the ground handlers to improve upon the decision-making process to support economical and efficient operations as well as future growth planned by airports and airlines. 1.2 Airports Authority of India took initiative in 2013 for establishing A-CDM for stakeholders of Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport (CSIA) which is one of the busiest single runway operations Page 1 of 6

airports in the world. The first phase of the A-CDM operations was launched on December 10, 2015with details in AIP supplement 82/2015.Since then it has become one of the essential tools in achieving smooth and efficient operations for CSIA Mumbai. This paper discusses the implementation details of the A-CDM system at CSIA Mumbai and on-going efforts in paving way for implementation of A-CDM System at other airports in India. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 Salient Features of Mumbai A-CDM System 2.1.1 The Mumbai ACDM Project is an in-house initiative by ATC officers at Mumbai airport. All the major stakeholders like ANSP, Airport operator, Airlines, and Ground Handling agencies have been involved in every stage of development and design of the system. It is evolving into a robust system that benefits all the stakeholders. 2.1.2 Salient features of the project are: a) Automatic calculation of TSAT (Target Start up Approval Time). b) Flight Data processing, independent of ATC Automation System (AT3). c) Real time information sharing among stakeholders (Airport operator, Aircraft operators, Ground Handlers, ATC) through dedicated customized application HMI. d) Real time information sharing among stakeholders and other users, through ACDM website. e) NOTAM Application: All India NOTAMs processed automatically. Page 2 of 6

2.2 Objectives 2.2.1 The Airport-CDM system works on the concept of calculating target start-up approval time (TSAT). Departures starting up at TSAT, will reach holding position in optimized timings so as to depart without causing congestion at the holding position. This system calculates TSAT automatically through a complex algorithm, which takes into account the runway handling capacity, arrival congestion, runway closures, dynamic TOBT and variable taxi times. 2.3 Data Sources 2.3.1 This system interactively works on the input from following data sources: 2.4 Output a) Aeronautical Fixed Telecommunication Network (AFTN) flight plan messages. b) Parking Stand and Registration Marking from airport operations database (AODB). c) Flight movement data from automation system. d) TOBT revisions from airline operators and ground handlers. e) Parking Stand revision from airport operator. 2.4.1 System is capable of processing and updating data every three seconds. 2.4.2 Relevant information to airline operators/ airport operator is displayed through a specifically developed interactive HMI. a) For departures: Color coded TSAT, TOBT, AOBT, ATOT and alerts are displayed. b) For arrivals: estimated landing time (ELDT), estimated in-block time (EIBT), actual landing time (ALDT), arrivals on final, bay alert etc. are displayed. 2.4.3 Processed data is displayed to ATC users through specifically designed HMI, which has control features like runway handling capacity, runway-in-use, runway closure, and slot control in addition to flights display. 2.4.4 All aviation stakeholders are provided with processed data through a dedicated website. The web interface provides TSAT, air defense clearance, movement charts, current NOTAMs, TOBT and bay alerts, automatic terminal information services (ATIS) for 46 airports and updated arrival information. 2.4.5 System maintains record of relevant flight movement information for future reference and analysis. Page 3 of 6

Airline Operators HMI 2.5 Milestones in the Journey So Far 2.5.1 Deciding the rules, unanimously acceptable to all the stakeholders, on which the functionality of the A-CDM system will depend. 2.5.2 Technical Milestones: a) Sharing of required live data streams and feed monitoring b) Integrating the data received from multiple live feed c) Database design and Database Server management d) System design and Software Coding e) Application and Web Servers design and security f) Network design, setup and security 2.5.3 Regular awareness and coordination meetings with a committee of Nodal Officers from stakeholders. 2.5.4 Internal Trials for testing Software Integrity. 2.5.5 Live Trials with all stakeholders. 2.5.6 Training of stakeholders executive staff. Page 4 of 6

2.6 Challenges 2.6.1 Convincing the stakeholders to accept the system and its rules. E.g. some of the operators have shown displeasure on holding them on the bay to consume delay till TSAT, as OTP is based on chocks-off time. 2.6.2 Apprehension of the Airline Operators, whether the system will be transparent. 2.6.3 Apprehension of the Airline Operators on sharing commercial information. 2.6.4 Apprehension of the Air Traffic Controllers on correctness of input data. 2.6.5 Educating stakeholders personnel, especially pilots. 2.7 Solutions 2.7.1 Regular interaction with and training for ACDM in stakeholders organization. 2.7.2 System is made transparent by allowing viewing rights on entire flight data to all stakeholders. 2.7.3 Information displayed is to the satisfaction of all stakeholders. Sensitive commercial information is not displayed. 2.7.4 Authorization to input data to the ACDM system is provided to trained manpower only. 2.7.5 AIP supplement, with details on the subject and system, has been issued and educative material has been circulated for pilots. 2.8. Benefits of ACDM at Mumbai 2.8.1 Implementation of ACDM has significantly reduced the delays at holding point resulting in considerable fuel saving and reduced carbon emission in the environment. One of the studies has indicated that the cumulative daily fuel saving is about 2835 minutes (approx. 47 hours) of Code- C aircraft on ground. For this study Code- C aircraft were considered as 85% of aircraft operations at Mumbai airport are of this category. 2.8.2 This taxi-time saving has resulted into significant reduction in fuel consumption and carbon emissions: A Code- C aircraft consumes approximately 12 Kg fuel per minute during taxi with frequent breaking action. This 2835 minutes of daily taxi-time amounts to 2835x12x365 = 12417300 Kg, i.e. 12417 Tonnes of annual fuel saving. This results in approximately 39487 Tonnes of lower CO2 emissions per annum. (12417300x3.18 /1000=39487 Tonnes of CO2). 2.8.3 Other benefits: a) Orderly flow of traffic. b) Optimization of airport and airspace capacity. c) Reduction of R/T congestion thereby improving safety. d) Achieving Common Situational Awareness (CSA). e) All India NOTAMs available in website, always updated automatically. f) Latest ATIS of 46 Indian Airports available through web interface. g) Various charts and reports of aircraft movements through web interface. Page 5 of 6

h) Increase of Trust Level between ATC and Airlines Operators due to greater transparency as the system is calculating TSAT in similar way every time, for all operators, considering Runway-in-use, closures, parking bay and priority criteria. i) Efficient use of resources by Airline operators. j) Improved Predictability. 2.9 Future Plans in India 2.9.1 Implementation activities are on at following airports to operationalize ACDM by March 31, 2018: a) Chennai International Airport, Chennai. b) Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose International Airport, Kolkata. 2.9.2 ACDM implementation at other major airports will be taken up after Chennai and Kolkata. 2.10 Extending Help to Other ANSPs 2.10.1 CANSO has prepared an introductory Guide for ANSPs on ACDM implementation. The guide has included nine case studies as reference ACDM implementation models. Mumbai ACDM model is listed at No. 2 in the list of these case studies. 2.10.2 The in-house team of Airports Authority of India (AAI) is looking after implementation of ACDM at all the major airports in India. The team has taken up the implementation from planning stage through programming, development, testing, upgrading and maintenance. Due to its expertise in all the project phases, AAI can extend any kind of support for ACDM project. 3. ACTION BY THE MEETING 3.1 The meeting is invited to; a) Note the progress made by AAI in developing A-CDM b) Note that AAI is ready to help other ANSPs, Airports in developing A-CDM systems. --------------------- Page 6 of 6