Survey on Proposal for New and Expanded MOAs over Michigan. General Aviation Pilots Describe the Impacts

Similar documents
November 30, Mr. Jamie A. Flanders Airspace Manager NGB/A2/3/6/10TA 3500 Fetchet Ave Joint Base Andrews, MD 20762

Powder River Training Complex Special Use Airspace General & Business Aviation Survey

2012 Mat Su Valley Collision Avoidance Survey

Teaching the National Airspace System. Soaring Safety Foundation FIRC Presentation

April 5, Dear Mr. Ready,

4.2 AIRSPACE. 4.2 Airspace. Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement August 2008 Military Training Activities at Mākua Military Reservation

CE 563 Airport Design

US Airspace A History

Appendix K: MSP Class B Airspace

UAS Pilot Course. Lesson 5 Study Guide- Operations. Questions taken from ASA Remote Pilot Test Prep Guide

Fresno Area Mid-Air Collision Avoidance Program (MACA)

ELEMENTS OF THE NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM

Class B Airspace. Description

Community Noise Consortium Meeting (CNC)

In our previous example for the circuit flight we have already learned how to ask for proper clearance so let's go.

Proposed Establishment of and Modification to Restricted Areas; Fort Sill, OK

ESA Telecom Startup Projects ITT AO-5114 SATWAYS 6/023. Final review

Aerial Photography and Flight Planning

129 th RQW/SE P.O. Box 103, MS#1 Moffett Federal Airfield, CA

Effective Altitude. R-3103 To 30,000 (To 9,144 meters) Source: NACO 2002 Notes: 1 By NOTAM issued 12 hours in advance

What Is The Proposed 29Palms Training Land Acquisition and Airspace Establishment Project? Frequently Asked Questions Airspace Related June 2014

Pope Field, NC MID-AIR COLLISION AVOIDANCE

Appendix C. User Survey Data

Airspace Consultation Feedback Report Part A (Full Version) Analysis & Summary of Responses

Civil/Military Coordination Workshop Havana, Cuba April 2015

Table 5-15 Special Use Airspace in the SBMR Airspace ROI

NAVAL AIR STATION WHIDBEY ISLAND AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL FACILITY

Airspace Establishment Project Frequently Asked Questions Permanent SUA and Environmental Assessment March 2019

D R O N E T R A C K E R. making your world possible

ASSEMBLY 39TH SESSION

CHAPTER 6:VFR. Recite a prayer (15 seconds)

Lansing Municipal Airport 3250 Bob Malkas Dr., Lansing, Illinois (708) phone (708) fax

DRAFT. Environmental Assessment for Establishment of the Grayling Temporary Military Operations Area (MOA)

Contents. Subpart A General 91.1 Purpose... 7

PLANNING A RESILIENT AND SCALABLE AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IN A CLIMATE-IMPACTED FUTURE

Public Comment on Condor MOA Proposal

KTRK HIGH. Truckee Tahoe Airport Truckee, California, United States

Overview of Satellite Navigation Transition. CAASD Industry Day with Users May 7, 2002

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

PRE SOLO WRITTEN EXAM

4.6 AIRSPACE. Approach to Analysis

SAFETY HIGHLIGHTS CESSNA CITATION AOPA AIR SAFETY INSTITUTE 1 SAFETY HIGHLIGHTS CESSNA CITATION

Community Noise Consortium Meeting (CNC)

2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study

MIDAIR COLLISION AVOIDANCE (MACA)

MRO 2017 Stakeholder Survey

AVIATION. MichiganReportCard.com 5

What Is The 29Palms Training Land Acquisition and Airspace Establishment Project Frequently Asked Questions Airspace Related July 2015

June 10, EST

2016 Manawatu Airspace Review

KOAK HIGH. Metropolitan Oakland Intl Airport Oakland, California, United States

Airport Community Roundtable Unapproved (Draft) Summary Minutes: December 20, 2017

Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport

STUDENT PILOT PRE-CROSS-COUNTRY WRITTEN EXAM

POSITION DESCRIPTION

FLASHCARDS AIRSPACE. Courtesy of the Air Safety Institute, a Division of the AOPA Foundation, and made possible by AOPA Holdings Company.

BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WA

Proposed Changes to Inverness Airport s Airspace The Introduction of Controlled Airspace and Optimisation of Instrument Flight Procedures

Report to Congress: Improving General Aviation Security

PLU Airport Master Plan. Master Plan Advisory Committee (MPAC) Meeting #2 October 16, 2016

Title: Airway Q41: Reclassify to Class G below Flight level 55. Subject Release of Controlled and Segregated Airspace

CAA DECISION LETTER MANSTON KENT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (KIA) RNAV (GNSS) HOLD AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL

A1/3 Page D - 3 Issue 7 AL19 30/03/2007

PILOT INFORMATION PACKET

Powder River Training Complex Commonly Asked Questions September 15, 2010

Pi Aero Instrument Rating Syllabus

Christchurch PBN Flight Paths Trial. Interim Report

Amendment of Restricted Areas R-2907A and R-2907B, Lake George, FL; and R-2910, Pinecastle, FL

FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT (F70) Sky Canyon Dr. Murrieta, CA. Phone: Riverside FAA FSDO Complaint Line: (951)

Newcastle International Airport Airspace Change Proposal Consultation Feedback report November 2017

ex) & Comple nce Avoidan 1 August 2010

AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A00Q0116 RISK OF COLLISION

Preferred Alternative Summary

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Letter of Agreement. Between Jacksonville ARTCC and Virtual United States Navy Effective Date: Sept 1, 2008

Background and Inventory

The Future of Tipton Airport in Anne Arundel County

4. How often do you use an IFR-certified GPS as your primary method of navigation? Answer Options

What you might learn depending on your level of drowsiness! Brief summary of US airspace history US airspace structure & regulatory requirements Speci

DEVELOPING AN ECOSYSTEM FOR UAS SAFETY 2017 WHITEPAPER SERIES

AIRSERVICES AUSTALIA DRAFT PRICING NOTIFICATION REGIONAL EXPRESS SUBMISSION TO THE ACCC MAY 2011

Thai Airline Passengers' Opinion and Awareness on Airline Safety Instruction Card

MetroAir Virtual Airlines

3) There have some basic terminology of a flight plan and it is the fuel calculations

NAVIGATION: CHARTS, PUBLICATIONS, FLIGHT COMPUTERS (chapters 7 & 8)

TCAS RA not followed. Tzvetomir BLAJEV Stan DROZDOWSKI

Figure 1 AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL STANSTED TMZ. STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION FEEDBACK Issue 1. EGSS TMZ Stakeholder Consultation Feedback

2013 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report

(b) (7)(E), (b) (6), (b) (7)(C)

AIRCRAFT NOISE ABATEMENT TASK FORCE FOR THE ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. January 28, 2004

NATMAC INFORMATIVE INTRODUCTION OF STANSTED TRANSPONDER MANDATORY ZONE (TMZ)

APPENDIX F AIRSPACE INFORMATION

Pre-Solo Written Exam (ASEL)

IFR Clearances Made Easy. Featuring: Doug Stewart

2018 Nelson and Marlborough Airspace Review Initial consultation

Amendment and Establishment of Restricted Areas; Chincoteague Inlet, VA

NOTAM. Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) Fly-In Colorado Springs Airport (COS) Colorado Springs, CO SPECIAL FLIGHT PROCEDURES

Diamond Star DA40 Pre-Solo Written Exam

Instrument Proficiency Check

TRAINING BULLETIN No. 1

Transcription:

Survey on Proposal for New and Expanded MOAs over Michigan General Aviation Pilots Describe the Impacts

Executive Summary 76% of respondent fly in the area sometimes, often, or always 58% of pilots fly VFR all or most of the time 62% normally operate between surface and 6,000ft MSL Percent of pilots who say airspace may negatively impact them 68% - Steelhead Low MOA 68% - Pike Low MOA 83% - Expanded Grayling MOA complex 63% - Would be affected if Victor Airways not available 80% - Concerns for the MOA s activation time Pike Low 68% Grayling 83% Steelhead 68% Most pilots concerned about GPS or ADS-B outages due to military GPS interference

Pilots Who Responded Typically Fly VFR at Altitudes from the Surface to 6,000ft MSL What percentage of your flying is VFR? 57.95% At what altitudes do you normally operate when flying? 35.79% 26.63% 20.69% 4.06% 9.13% 14.66% 14.21% 10.20% 3.75% 2.94% None About a quarter About half About three quarters All or most Surface to 3,000 ft MSL 3,001 to 6,000 ft MSL 6,001 to 8,000 ft MSL 8,001 to 10,000 ft MSL 10,001 to 12,000 ft MSL Above 12,000 ft MSL N=887

44.04% How often do you fly in the area proposed to have expanded SUA? N=809 18.09% 26.40% 5.73% 5.73% Never Seldom Sometimes Often Always or almost always

Will the lower floor altitude of the Steelhead MOA impact your flying? N=809 No 32% Yes 41% Pilots are concerned that the new and expanded MOAs will have significant impacts on their flying Limit visitation/tourism to the area many pilots said they just won t fly there The MOAs will increase the cost of flying to or through the Michigan thumb area Flying in the new MOAs increases the risks (and consequently, the stress) associated with flying in the area Maybe 27%

How Will The Lower Floor Impact Your Flying? Common themes included Increased costs for fuel and time to go around the MOA when it s active Increased risk flying through it when active Limiting visits/flights in the thumb area to avoid MOA

No 17% Will the new Grayling MOA complex impact your flying? N=786 Yes 52% Maybe 31%

Will Pike Low MOA have an impact on your flying? N=766 No 32% Yes 37% Maybe 31%

35.78% 37.16% These new MOAs would affect the availability of Victor Airways in this area, would that affect your flying? N=248 27.06% Yes Maybe No Note: Includes only pilots who fly VFR about half the time or less

Intentional GPS Interference Have You Experienced a GPS Outage Attributable to a Known Military Interference Event? N=753 65.47% Are You Concerned about Military GPS Interference Events Impacting Your Ability to Fly with GPS or ADS-B? N=758 49.87% 25.76% 24.67% 25.46% 8.76% Yes No Not sure Yes Maybe No

59.81% Do you have concerns about the activation times of the Pike Low, Steelhead Low, and/or the Grayling MOAs N=678 19.77% 20.42% Airports within the MOAs could be negatively impacted Alpena County Regional Airport Atlanta Municipal Airport Eagle II Airport Hillman Airport Huron County Memorial Airport Iosco County Airport Oscoda County Dennis Kauffman Memorial Airport Oscoda-Wurtsmith Airport Presque Isle County Airport Sebewaing Airport Yes Maybe No Note: Includes only those pilots who indicated that they fly in these SUA sometimes or with greater frequency

AOPA Developed an online survey instrument to ask GA pilots how the Steelhead Low, Pike Low, and Grayling MOAs will impact their flying AOPA emailed a link to this survey to every pilot in Michigan and 20% of pilots in Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Wisconsin Methodology We received 887 survey starts and 753 completed responses Response rate was 6.3%, for a margin of error of +/- 3.5% 40% of Pilots who participated in the survey provided an email address when asked if they wanted AOPA to keep them updated

Timeline October 2018 National Guard Bureau shares informal proposal with AOPA November AOPA submits feedback after consulting with local airports and operators Recommended numerous changes December Military conducts outreach meetings with local stakeholders January 2019 Local news stories increase interest February AOPA conducts survey ahead of formal comment periods