System Group Meeting #1. March 2014

Similar documents
CHAPTER 5. Chapter 5 Recreation Element

IRIS Internet Research Information Series

Central Wasatch Visitor Use Study STEVEN W. BURR, PH.D. AND CHASE C. LAMBORN, M.S. INSTITUTE FOR OUTDOOR RECREATION AND TOURISM UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY

O REGON TRAILS SUMMIT. Oregon Trails Summit. Rogue River National Forest

SOCIAL CONFLICT BETWEEN MOTORIZED AND NON-MOTORIZED RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES.

Discussion Topics. But what does counting tell us? Current Trends in Natural Resource Management

FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands

National Recreation Trail Update Form

Village of Taos Ski Valley 2015 Master Plan. Recreation Element

National Recreation Trail Application for Designation

Federal Outdoor Recreation Trends Effects on Economic Opportunities

Percentage Participation

Berg Ridge BERG RIDGE 1

Appendix D ( Rock Climbing Survey) Scroll Down

10/25/2013. What is the SCORP?! 2013 Local Government Survey 2013 Statewide Public Survey Advisory Group Priority Areas Your Suggestions!

Proposed Scotchman Peaks Wilderness Act 2016 (S.3531)

AMERICAN S PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION: Results From NSRE 2000 (With weighted data) (Round 1)

Appendix A BC Provincial Parks System Goals

TRAIL USER PERMIT FEE NATURAL RESOURCES, AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT INTERIM COMMITTEE

GATEWAY PHASE 2. U.S. Forest Service and the Mount Shasta Trails Association

Risk Assessment in Winter Backcountry Travel

13.1 REGIONAL TOURISM ISSUES AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

4.0 OUTDOOR RECREATION 4.1 PUBLIC LANDS

COLORADO STATE PARKS NORTHWEST REGION RON VELARDE NORTHWEST REGIONAL MANAGER

WILDERNESS PLANNING. Wilderness. Interagency Regional Wilderness Stewardship Training. Alamosa, Colorado - March 26-29, 2007

ROYAL GORGE PARK and RECREATION AREA. A Feat of Natural and Man-Made Engineering

PROPOSED ACTION South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT United States Department of Agriculture

Welcome and thank you for being here! Kick-Off Public Workshop November 19, 2014

BRYCE CANYON COUNTRY. A twisted tree endures rugged life on the rim of the Paunsaugunt Plateau.

As outlined in the Tatshenshini-Alsek Park Management Agreement, park management will:

Creating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering

Table 3-7: Recreation opportunity spectrum class range by prescription. Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) Classes

RECREATION. Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area.

Blueways: Rivers, lakes, or streams with public access for recreation that includes fishing, nature observation, and opportunities for boating.

Restore and implement protected status that is equivalent, or better than what was lost during the mid-1990 s

The Utah Trails Initiative: Partnerships, Research, and Action

NAVAJO COMMUNITY PLAN

PROJECT OVERVIEW WHAT IS THE GENERAL PLAN? WHY UPDATE THE PLAN? THE GENERAL PLAN WILL: WASATCH CANYONS GENERAL PLAN UPDATE

2014 STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN

BACKSTORY & MMBA RECOMMENDATIONS

Green Mountain Trail Collaborative Stewardship and Communication Work Group Meeting Notes June 30, 2010

Chapter 9 Recreation

5.0 OUTDOOR RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES AND MANAGEMENT

Mammoth Winter Recreation Summit Saturday March 19, 2016

Teton County Wyoming WPLI Proposal-Palisades and Shoal Creek Special Management Areas

Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018

WASHINGTON STATE PARKS LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

Nov. 19 th Public Workshop Summary

Recreation Effects Report Travel Management

VCC WINTER Association Directives

MOREAU LAKE STATE PARK CURRENT PLANNING EFFORTS

DOWNLOAD OR READ : UTAH NATIONAL PARKS MAP PACK BUNDLE ADVENTURE MAP PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

BACKSTORY & MMBA RECOMMENDATIONS

RUSHMORE CONNECTOR TRAIL PROPOSAL

Design Charrette Public Meeting

Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance

Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. P-308 Proposed Study Plans - Recreation August 2011

AMC Worcester Chapter Leadership Requirements & Guidelines REV 8.2 April 2010

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION

Base Camp Las Vegas: Hiking The Southwestern States By Deborah Wall READ ONLINE

Woodland Mountain Property

Draft Transportation System Existing Conditions. System Group Recommendations

Payette National Forest Duty Station: New Meadows, Idaho Please respond by March 1, 2013

Whitefish Range Partnership Tentatively Approved by WRP 11/18/2013!Rec. Wilderness Page 1

3.0 LEARNING FROM CHATHAM-KENT S CITIZENS

2009/10 OUTDOOR RECREATION STUDY BC RESIDENT PARTICIPATION. January 2013

Briefing Paper: USFS Wilderness and Other Federal Designations

Minnesota River Valley Area Survey Summary Report

112th CONGRESS. 1st Session H. R. 113 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Lewis and Clark Recreation Area

Charming 3Bed/2 bath Townhouse Ski In/Out, Hot Tub, Golf Course Views

Theme: Predominately natural/natural appearing; rustic improvements to protect resources. Size*: 2,500 + acres Infrastructure**:

APPENDIX C RECREATION OPPORTUNITY SPECTRUM PROCESS AND CLASSES

CURRENT AND POTENTIAL USE LEVELS BY ACTIVITY.

MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SAXON HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT SURVEY

ECONOMIC PROFILE. Tourism

Coyote Gulch, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Utah, Spring Break 2009

Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in Parks Project Descriptions

LESSON 9 Recognizing Recreational Benefits of Wilderness

Ashley National Forest Assessment

April 10, Mark Stiles San Juan Public Lands Center Manager 15 Burnett Court Durango, CO Dear Mark,

TWO NIGHT AGENDA. Wednesday Oct Big Ideas, Big Goals Who wants to eat the cake?

National Outdoor Recreation Conference April 2018

These expenses are mainly on gear, vehicles, trips, travel-related expenses and more.

BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE

PURPOSE AND NEED. Introduction

Opportunities for Solitude in Salt Lake Ranger District Wilderness Areas; Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest

RE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan, Preliminary Ideas and Concepts

ONTARIO TRAILS COUNCIL FAQ

Wilderness Stewardship Plan Scoping Newsletter Winter 2013

Planning Future Directions. For BC Parks: BC Residents' Views

California Agritourism Snapshot 2017 Riverside/San Bernardino/San Diego Agritourism Summit March 29, 2017

Pacific Northwest National Scenic Trail. USDA-Forest Service Pacific Northwest and Northern Regions April 2014

Bryce Canyon Visitor Study

NATURE-BASED OUTDOOR RECREATION

California Agritourism Snapshot 2017

Thank you for this second opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.

OPEN SPACE. The Open Space Element describes the County s goals and policies with respect to open space areas and addresses the following topics:

4/1/2009. Wilderness Character

Transcription:

System Group Meeting #1 March 2014

Meeting #1 Outcomes 1. Understand Your Role 2. List of Revisions to Existing Conditions 3. Information Sources

Study Area

The Purpose of Mountain Accord is to Preserve the Legacy of the Wasatch Enhance Regional Transportation Preserve the Environment Strengthen the Regional Economy Promote High Quality Recreational Experiences

Organization Executive Board Steering Committee Stakeholder Advisory Committee System Groups Environment Recreation Transportation Economy

Systems Approach Integrated System decisions First look at each System Current and Projected Most important problems and opportunities Ideal future, and actions to achieve it

Phase 1 Process

Meeting Outcomes Existing Conditions Trendlines Vision/Goals/Metrics Idealized Systems 1 (March) 2 (early April) 3 (late April) 4 (May) 5 (June) 6 (July) 7 (Aug) = discuss draft information = discuss revised info and poll group on recommendation(s)

Consensus Process 1 st Meeting on Milestone Between Meetings 2 nd Meeting on Milestone Present and Discuss Topic Identify Revisions Revise Information Resolve Issues Draft Recommendation Discuss Recommendation Poll Group Collect Comments for Exec Board

Consensus Process System Group Recommendation Post Report on Website and Collect Comments Co-Chairs Discussion Presentation at Stakeholder Meeting Executive Board Approval

Existing Conditions What do you need to agree with the following statement? This is the best available information on Existing Conditions to inform my vote on a future Idealized System

Existing Conditions How do we recreate in the Wasatch Mountains? What resources do we use? Where are they located? How do we access them? What makes it unique? What are the problems? Are there opportunities for greatness?

Data Sources

Regional Overview

Historic Trends Nationally, growth in outdoor recreation participation mirrors population growth. Population growth County 1950 1975 2000 2012 2020 2040 Salt Lake 279,000 (26%) Summit 6,700 (18%) Wasatch 5,500 (22%) 521,200 (49%) 7,500 (20%) 7,000 (28%) 902,843 (85%) 30,012 (80%) 15,427 (61%) 1,059,112 1,180,859 (111%) 37,704 45,491 (121%) 25,354 32,741 (129%) 1,507,997 (142%) 71,433 (189%) 59,159 (233%) Sources: Outdoor Industry Association, Governor s Office of Management and Budget

Outdoor Recreation Participation United States Utah No No Yes Yes 50% 82% Source: Outdoor Industry Association

Arches National Park Bryce Canyon National Park Canyonlands National Park Capitol Reef National Park Zion National Park 5 Utah National Parks Combined Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Outdoor Recreation in Utah 10,000,000 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 Annual Visitation at Utah Outdoor Recreation Attractions Source: U.S. Forest Service, State of Utah Outdoor Recreation Vision

Uinta-Wasatch-Cache NF

1955 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 Utah Skier Days Ski and Snowboard Visitation 4,500,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 - Source: Ski Utah/RRC

Outdoor Recreation in Utah All Outdoor Recreation Resort Skiing and Snowboarding No Yes Yes No 82% participation 5.5% participation Source: Ski Utah/RRC, Outdoor Industry Association, Governor s Office of Management and Budget

Outdoor Recreation in Utah Utah Outdoor Recreation Participation by Activity Walking for exercise Picnicking Swimming Camping Hiking or backpacking Fishing Other bicycling Wildlife or bird watching Running OHV riding Motorized water sports Mountain biking Hunting Horseback riding Rock climbing 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent of Utah population participating in activity in past 12 months Source: Utah State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan

Historic Use and Facility Development Recreational facilities Resort development Parks and open space preservation Trail development Urban expansion

What activities occur? Variety of uses in all seasons Broad spectrum of natural, built, social, and economic settings Resort skiing and snowboarding Summer resort concessions Backcountry skiing and snowboarding Snowmobiling Mountain biking Hiking Backpacking Running Sightseeing Scenic driving Fishing Hunting Rock and ice climbing Snowshoeing Picnicking Camping Photography Nordic skiing Sledding Wildlife viewing Road cycling Dog walking Off Highway Vehicle use Organized events

Recreational Resources Summer Recreation Trails Motorized / multi-use paths / hiking / hiking and biking / downhill mountain biking Trailheads Recreation sites Rock climbing / campgrounds / picnic areas / bike parks / dog walking areas / resorts Transit service Winter Recreation Backcountry winter recreation areas Ski and snowboard touring areas / lift accessed areas / motorized use areas Ski resorts and Nordic skiing areas Transit service Trailheads

Recreational Resources Recreational Setting Land jurisdiction USFS / USFS wilderness / private / state / parks and protected open space USFS Recreation Opportunity Spectrum Primitive / semi-primitive non-motorized / semi-primitive motorized / roaded natural / rural / urban

Existing Conditions Maps Link to map viewer: http://bit.ly/1cimgnq

Summer Recreation

Winter Recreation

Land Jurisdiction

Recreation Setting The setting for recreation activities has a direct effect on the enjoyment of these activities. U.S. Forest Service Recreation Opportunity Spectrum: Urban Rural Security Comfort Socializing Roaded Natural Semi-primitive Motorized Semi-primitive Non-motorized Primitive Solitude Natural hazards Self reliance

Recreation Setting

Issues identified in previous studies Parking and access to recreation Compatibility between recreational uses and private property Loss of recreation opportunities due to development Recreational overuse and crowding Compatibility between recreational user groups

Issues identified in previous studies Long-term/sustainable funding for management and development of recreation facilities Safety of recreational users Balance between commercial and non-commercial recreational uses Year-round and non-traditional recreational use at resorts

Example Performance Metrics Recreational use and participation USFS National Visitor Use Monitoring, household and individual participation, industry economic trends Diversity of recreational settings USFS Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (acres of each setting type available) Resort skiing experience Skier density, lift capacity, visitor days Trail systems Number of national awards, citizen perception of quality, trail user counts, miles of trail Parks and open space protection Acres protected (wilderness, purchased, easement, zoning), area of open space per capita

Meeting #2 April 1, 9-11 am, UTA Promontory Room Outcomes: 1. Agreement on Existing Conditions 2. Revisions to Trends