WATERBORNE TRANSIT. April 21, 2010

Similar documents
Potomac River Commuter Ferry Feasibility Study & RPE Results

Development of SH119 BRT Route Pattern Alternatives for Tier 2 - Service Level and BRT Route Pattern Alternatives

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

Treasure Island Supplemental Information Report Addendum

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

Airport Master Planning Process & Update

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

FORECASTING FUTURE ACTIVITY

Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan

Appendix 4.1 J. May 17, 2010 Memorandum from CTPS to the Inter Agency Coordinating Group

Silver Line Operating Plan

Landside Safety Programs

2. Proceed 3 and 3/4 miles on Fort Eustis Blvd to traffic light. Turn left on to Route 17 North (George Washington Memorial Highway).

1. Introduction. 2. Overview of Existing Conditions

PLEASE READ Proposal for Sustainable Service

Master Plan Update Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

Union Station Queens Quay Transit Link Study

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

COLT RECOMMENDED BUSINESS PLAN

2.0 Miami-Dade Transit System Overview

11 December Inverness Airport Outline Business Case

BNA Master Plan Update Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 5

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

City of Austin Department of Aviation Austin Bergstrom International Airport 2040 Master Plan. Public Workshop #2 April 19, 2018

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

ROUTE 110. St. Albans Downtown Shuttle ROUTE OVERVIEW

2018 Service Changes Ada County

Miami Orlando Passenger Rail Project Overview

DRAFT. Airport Master Plan Update Sensitivity Analysis

2018 Service Implementation Plan Executive Summary

Caroline County / King George County Transit Studies. Meeting November 1, 2017

Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue

2 YORK REGION TRANSIT MOBILITY PLUS 2004 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REVIEW

GILMERTON INDUSTRIAL PARK MICHAEL DRIVE

2018 Airport Master Plan Overview of Development Concepts. Greg Ballentine (WSP)

Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus

Analysis of Operational Impacts of Continuous Descent Arrivals (CDA) using runwaysimulator

Table of Contents. List of Tables

Norfolk International Airport

Update on Palm Beach MPO Funded Projects

Table of Contents. Master Plan March 2014 TOC i Spokane International Airport

MAXIMIZING INVESTMENT AND UTILIZATION

Hampton Roads Passenger Rail Task Force. February 29, 2012

Wake Bus Plan. Short Range Transit Plans. Proposed Transit Service Projects and Changes. GoCary. Volume 3 DRAFT

EL PASO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSIT INSTITUTIONAL OPTIONS ASSESSMENT STUDY

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Quality of Life Study

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

Overview of Highway 37 Project. Novato Rotary November 4, 2016

City of Murfreesboro. Transit Service and Management Alternatives

4. Proposed Transit Improvements

Water Emergency Transportation Authority Program Update. Maritime Commerce Advisory Committee Port of San Francisco July 21, 2011

Fixed-Route Operational and Financial Review

METROPOLITAN EVANSVILLE TRANSIT SYSTEM Part I: Comprehensive Operations Analysis Overview July 9 th, 2015 Public Information Meeting

7272 WISCONSIN AVENUE LOCAL AREA TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

21 Minutes Flying on the Ground Qatar Bahrain MagLev-Link

THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF AIRPORTS

CHAPTER 5: Operations Plan

Why we re here: For educational purposes only

Public Transit Services on NH 120 Claremont - Lebanon

Summary of Proposed NH 120 Service

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

PREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time.

Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in the Metroplex

Southeast Raleigh (Routes 17, 18, 18S, and 19)

Corridor Analysis. Corridor Objectives and Strategies Express Local Limited Stop Overlay on Local Service 1 Deadhead

Executive Summary. Introduction. Community Assessment

Optimized Profile Descents A.K.A. CDA A New Concept RTCA Airspace Working Group

UNION STATION ACCESS AND CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT STUDY PROJECT REPORT

Project Deliverable 4.1.3d Individual City Report - City of La Verne

Manual vs. Automatic Operation and Operational Restrictions

Towards a 100% renewable energy future: WÄRTSILÄ Energy Solutions

New System. New Routes. New Way. May 20, 2014

Destination Lindbergh

BNA Master Plan Update Public Meeting No. 2

Multimodal Planning Studies

Oakland A s Gondola Economic Impact

DISTRICT EXPRESS LANES ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017 JULY 1, 2016 JUNE 30, FloridaExpressLanes.com

HOW TO IMPROVE HIGH-FREQUENCY BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY THROUGH SCHEDULING

Ridership Projection: Direct Ferry to Midtown W 39th St.

Serving the Tampa Bay Maritime Community Since Celebrating over 125 Years of Service

AIRPORT OPERATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

LEYELOV I I ... ** L 8. I *~~~~~...i DATA PACKAGE IVM, 8~ AIRPORT IMPROVEMVENT TASK FORCE DELAY STUDIES

Overview of Highway 37 Project. Napa County Board of Supervisors December 20, 2016

SEHSR Mainline Corridor and its two possible Hampton Roads Extension Routes

Virginia Association of Railway Patrons 2008 Annual Meeting March 1, 2008

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

14 YORK REGION TRANSIT (YRT/VIVA) SOUTHWEST DIVISION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACT EXTENSION

Business Intelligence Development at Winnipeg Transit

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

2015 Independence Day Travel Overview U.S. Intercity Bus Industry

Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Board Meeting. Wednesday, January 17, 2018

Intercity Transit Short / Long Range Plan Short-Term Recommendations Transit Authority Meeting

CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Appendix D Project Newsletters. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Design-Build Institute of America September 8, 2015

Transcription:

WATERBORNE TRANSIT CONCEPTS STUDY April 21, 2010 1

Overview: Summary of previous 2004/2005 Ferry Service analysis Results of recent study focusing on ferry service from Newport News Conclusions 2

2004/2005 analysis: Ferry concepts analyzed service between: Naval Station Norfolk and downtown Hampton/downtown Newport News Downtown Norfolk and downtown Hampton/downtown t Newport News Included option for Fort Monroe Included coordination with the Navy regarding remote parking and transit circulator options 3

Newport News Ferry Operations Travel Time (2004/2005) Downtown Newport News to Naval Station Norfolk: 16 minutes Downtown Newport News to Downtown Norfolk: 44 minutes Downtown Newport News to Naval Station Norfolk and Downtown Norfolk: 60 minutes NOTE: Times do not include boarding and alighting. 4

Hampton Ferry Operations Travel Time (2004/2005) Downtown Hampton to Naval Station Norfolk: 22 minutes (including no wake area in Hampton Harbor) Fort Monroe to Naval Station Norfolk: 11 minutes Downtown Hampton to Downtown Norfolk: 52 minutes Downtown Hampton to Naval Station Norfolk and Downtown Norfolk: Approximately 65 minutes NOTE: Times do not include boarding and alighting. 5

2004/2005 Conceptual Ridership Results from Hampton and Newport News Link Daily Ridership at 30 Minute Frequency Daily Ridership at 60 Minute Frequency Service from the Peninsula (Hampton/Newport News) to Naval Station Norfolk 2360 810 Service from the Peninsula (Hampton/Newport News) to Downtown Norfolk 1200 550 Service from the Peninsula (Hampton/Newport News) to Naval Station Norfolk and Downtown Norfolk* 2880 1055 *Ferry vessel goes to each destination Capital costs and operating/maintenance costs for each option were more than $20 million. Funding was unavailable to proceed with ferry service. 6

2009/2010 Conceptual Ferry Study for the City of Newport News Completed as a sub-task of a larger, on-going Planning effort for the City of Newport News Scope of Work: Feasibility of waterborne transit alternatives between Newport News and Norfolk Assessment of existing conditions Travel Demand Existing transportation network Review of previous work and ferry service Develop Concepts options, including Conceptual Capital Costs Conceptual Operations and Maintenance Costs Ridership (as estimated by the travel demand forecasts) Connectivity to regional transit network Used previous study as basis Provides conceptual options for ferry service, but not a detailed analysis 7

Waterborne Transit Concepts (2009/2010) Concept A would provide service on two routes from Newport News: Route 1 between Newport News and Naval Station Norfolk Route 2 between Newport News and Downtown Norfolk Limited service between Newport News and Fort Eustis with one morning and one evening trip Concepts B and C would provide service on one route from Newport News to Naval Station Norfolk to downtown Norfolk Concept C providing limited service between Newport News and Fort Eustis with one morning and one evening trip. 8

Concept A 9

Concepts B and C 10

Ferry Service Assumptions Concept A Concept B Concept C Route 1: Newport News to Naval Station Norfolk Route 2: Newport News to downtown Norfolk Includes limited service to Fort Eustis Newport News to Naval Station Norfolk to downtown Norfolk returning to Naval Station Norfolk to Newport News Newport News to Naval Station Norfolk to downtown Norfolk returning to Naval Station Norfolk to Newport News Includes limited service to Fort Eustis Peak Headways 25-35 minutes Hourly Hourly Speed 30 knots 15-25 knots (no-wake zone) 30 knots 15-25 knots (no-wake zone) 30 knots 15-25 knots (no-wake zone) Travel Time Fort Eustis to Newport News Newport News to Naval Station Norfolk Naval Station Norfolk to downtown Norfolk Newport News to downtown Norfolk 39 minutes 17 minutes n/a 27-31 minutes n/a 17 minutes 25-29 minutes 55-59 minutes 39 minutes 17 minutes 25-29 minutes 55-59 minutes Travel Distance Fort Eustis to Newport News Newport News to Naval Station Norfolk Naval Station Norfolk to downtown Norfolk Newport News to downtown Norfolk 18 nautical miles 8.5 nautical miles n/a 12.5 nautical miles n/a 8.5 nautical miles 11.5 nautical miles 19 nautical miles 18 nautical miles 8.5 nautical miles 11.5 nautical miles 19 nautical miles 11

Fast Ferry Technology Fast ferry technology is rapidly advancing in the area of reduced wakes. Kitsap Transit in Washington State ordered an ultra-low wake fast ferry in 2009 for an area environmentally sensitive to wake impacts. The catamaran style vessel uses hydrofoil assisted technology to reduce wake heights and decrease wake energy. The Newport News conceptual ferry study assumed a range in speed of 15-25 knots in the no-wake zone. One specific vessel has not been selected. Capital costs increase with advanced technology. A balance will need to be found between speed, travel time and ridership. 12

Ferry Concepts Summary Concept A Concept B Concept C Route 1: Newport News to Naval Station Norfolk Route 2: Newport News to downtown Norfolk Includes limited service to Fort Eustis Newport News to Naval Station Norfolk to downtown Norfolk returning to Naval Station Norfolk to Newport News Newport News to Naval Station Norfolk to downtown Norfolk returning to Naval Station Norfolk to Newport News Includes limited service to Fort Eustis Capital Costs 1 $14.9 M $14.0 M $14.9 M O&M Costs 2 $6.2 M $5.6 M $5.6 M Ridership 2034 (average week day) 1184-1644 572-810 659-957 Source: Parsons, Connetics Transportation Group, and AECOM December, 2009 1 Capital Costs assume: Adequate parking is available at Newport News and downtown Norfolk. Naval Station Norfolk would be served primarily by shuttle service. A 40 space park and ride lot is included for Fort Eustis. Construction of two docks with two berths each at Newport News. Existing dock facilities would be utilized at Naval Station Norfolk, downtown Norfolk, and Fort Eustis. Purchase of a total of four vessels, including one spare, for each concept. Two additional buses would be purchased to provide shuttle service in Newport News and at Naval Station Norfolk. 2 Operating and Maintenance Costs assume: Concept A would operate from 5:25 AM through 11:02 PM with three vessels in operation an average of 16 hours per day. Concept B would operate from 5:45 AM to 9:56 PM and Concept C would operate from 5:45 AM to 9:19 PM. Concepts B and C have three vessels in operation an average of 14 hours per day. Fuel and some personnel costs are based on hours of operation with higher costs for Concept A due to longer hours of operation. Administrative personnel costs, insurance, marketing, and maintenance are based on number of vessels in operation and are the same for all three concepts. Shuttle buses would operate in conjunction with ferry at Newport News and Naval Station Norfolk. 13

Conclusions Based on the key geographic features of the region, a waterborne ferry system is a feasible transit service concept in providing regional connectivity. it The costs were developed at a conceptual level to facilitate comparison of costs and ridership potential. Based on the ridership results, Concept A provides the optimal passenger service concept for frequency and travel time. The ridership estimates could vary based on the selected ferry vessel which may alter service travel times. Further detailed cost and ridership analyses, including associated landside transit service connections would be needed prior to a specific service concept approval or implementation. Connection to landside transit services and development of needed ferry terminal would require further definition and analysis. 14

Conclusions (continued) Coordination with the Navy would be needed, including a reassessment of safety and security concerns. Ridership estimates are based on commuter travel patterns. Vessel technology must provide competitive travel times and address the restrictions created by no-wake zones approaching downtown Norfolk. Land use connections and planning would need further analysis. The Transit Vision Plan, Phase II, currently underway, includes ferry service from Newport News and Hampton to the Southside as a key element in regional transit system for Hampton Roads. 15

Alameda Harbor Bay Ferry 16