FUA Workshop COL Christophe HINDERMANN French Military ATM Directorate Head of Airspace Sub-Division

FUA Workshop COL Christophe HINDERMANN French Military ATM Directorate Head of Airspace Sub-Division

Civil and Military co-management MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION MINISTRY OF ARMED FORCES Military ATM Director High Level Airspace Policy Board HLAPB Application of FUA concept Airspace Design Airspace Management Define International MIL Policy Air Transport Director Specialised Permanent Sub-Groups Control System Interoperability Airport infrastructures ATM SAFETY RPAS

Air Transport Director ACC Brest / Reims Bordeaux / Marseille Strategic Level 1 HLAPB Regional Management Committees MIL ATM Director Regional ATM Sub-Directories North / South ACC FMP DSNA/DO Civil Pre tactical Level 2 AMC Colocated at Athis-Mons CDPGE Mil MIL AUs AUP NLT D-1 : 16h00 UUP up to H-4 to 5 ACC Negociation after H-3 & Real Time Coordination Tactical Level 3 AIR FORCE CRC CMCC NAVY CRC

French Practices at Strategic Level A close cooperation between Civilian and Military ATM directorates at national and regional level Airspace structures sharply tailored to the right needs Airspace structures compliant for 10 years with A-FUA concepts (Military Variable Profile Area, Variable Geometric Area) Enhanced airspace management with Traffic Light Scheme associated with some hotspot areas The right airspace at the right time for the right needs

French Practices at Strategic Level TSA 200 MVPA Structure

French Practices at Strategic Level Defined applications modalities CDM rules Joint Level 2 Protocol TSA 200 Associated TLS

French Practices at Pre-Tactical Level AIR FORCE ARMY DEFENCE NAVY PROCUREMENT AGENCY M-2 / M-1 AMC Air Activity Regulation Committee ATC D-5 / D-1 AMC Pre-Tactical Negotiation D-1 16h00 AUP AUP - Airspace requests limited to the right needs UUP - Early Airspace releases (H-5 for NM/AOs/CFSPs needs) - Military airspaces = 26 % of the FR airspace - PI NEGO : 93 % (MIL satisfaction rate) - PI ENV : 73 % (real use) - Real MIL Use = 1,7 % of the time/space footprint.

French Practices at Tactical Level CMCC Embedded within ACCs En-Route OAT Flights ACC ATC Tactical Coordination MIL CRC Military Coordination Officer ASM Tactical Coordination Civil Coordination Detachment ATC Tactical Coordination Level 3 (Information requests) and 3+ (Action requests) are very efficient ASM tactical Coordination MIL requests on active areas (slot extension/volume adjusting) Acceptance Rate : 89 % MIL new airspaces requests Acceptance Rate : 94 %

Strategic Level To sum up and further needs All TSA/TRA compliant with MVPA/VGA/FRA concepts Apply Traffic Light Scheme to TSA/TRA on case-by-case basis Pre-tactical Level Harmonize at European level application of FUA/AFUA concepts : - Promote the right need culture (AUPs) - Give better predictability by limiting changes after AUP (UUPs) FUA The Way Ahead Pre-tactical Level Coordinate at Network Level with ANSPs, AOs and CFSPs to take into account the AUP/UUP changes and the RAD/FUA restrictions Promote FBZ concept to constrain Flight Plans in and around planned TSA/TRA Harmonize Planning Tools? (e.g. DIANE in France, LARA) Tactical Level Harmonize Current Ops Tools? (e.g. STANLY_ACOS in Germany) Is the flexibility we deliver really used?