Proceedings, 2012 International Snow Science Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska

Similar documents
International Snow Science Workshop

THRESHOLD GUIDELINES FOR AVALANCHE SAFETY MEASURES

90 I-90 Snoqualmie Pass East September Annual Mega-Project Report. Project Benefits

Structural Avalanche Defenses Chris Wilbur, P.E. Wilbur Engineering, Inc. SW Colorado Chapter ASCE February 15, 2012

International Snow Science Workshop

VISITOR RISK MANAGEMENT APPLIED TO AVALANCHES IN NEW ZEALAND

Guidelines for Snow Avalanche Risk Determination and Mapping. David McClung University of British Columbia

5.1 Traffic and Transportation

Typical avalanche problems

Memorandum. Roger Millar, Secretary of Transportation. Date: April 5, Interstate 90 Operations and Mercer Island Mobility

SYNOPSIS WEATHER AND SNOWPACK

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Banff, 2014

MEMORANDUM. for HOV Monitoring on I-93 North and the Southeast Expressway, Boston Region MPO, November, 2011.

In southern Upper Valais a very high avalanche danger will be encountered in some regions Edition: , 08:00 / Next update: 9.1.

NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES

PennDOT Interstate Work next week March 30-April 3:

HIGHWAY RAIL GRADE CROSSING CONSOLIDATION PROGRAM

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

Jumbo Glacier Resort Master Plan Appendix 2-A

e. Artificial avalanche release. This usually consists of delivering explosives to avalanche starting 2.5 AVALANCHE MITIGATION

Hospital Link Project Project Update Winter 2018

This section evaluates the projected traffic operations and circulation impacts associated with the proposed upgrade and expansion of the LWRP.

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Breckenridge, Colorado, 2016

UNITED KINGDOM AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR

a. The historic avalanche areas, or areas in which there exists clear evidence of previous avalanches, are mapped.

MEMORANDUM. Lynn Hayes LSA Associates, Inc.

Avalanche danger high in parts of NCW

Other Principle Arterials Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local

SNOW AVALANCHES IN PROVO CANYON, UTAH

Research Report Agreement T4118, Task 24 HOV Action Plan HOV ACTION PLAN

Excelsior Pass Avalanche Accident January 1, 2008

Slot Couloir Accident, Snoqualmie Mt

A GIS Analysis of Probable High Recreation Use Areas in Three Sisters Wilderness Deschutes and Willamette National Forests

FIJI ISLANDS AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR

Avalanche Protection. Safety without Compromise

FNORTHWEST ARKANSAS WESTERN BELTWAY FEASIBILITY STUDY

Chapter 7 Snow and ice

CITY MANAGER S OFFICE CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WASHINGTON 9611 SE 36 th Street Mercer Island, WA (206)

FOREST SERVICE AVALANCHE CENTER SAFETY: EXAMINING CURRENT PRACTICE. USDA Forest Service National Avalanche Center, Bozeman, MT, USA 2

MORGAN CREEK GREENWAY Final Report APPENDICES

PUBLIC NOTICE. Table 1 Projects Proposed by Amendment

AVALANCHE SAFETY PLAN

NORTH CASCADE SLACIER CLIMATE PROJECT Director: Dr. Mauri S. Pelto Department of Environmental Science Nichols College, Dudley MA 01571

MP : the top of the bottom switchback

Section 106 Update Memo #1 Attachment D. Traffic Diversion & APE Expansion Methodology & Maps

A. CONCLUSIONS OF THE FGEIS

NWAC Blog. Cornices - don't walk the line! Written by Robert Hahn on March 14, Last update on May 15, 2017.

Elevation Bands Description of terrain characteristics to which the avalanche danger ratings apply.

American Avalanche Association Forest Service National Avalanche Center Avalanche Incident Report: Long Form

SHEET PILE WALLS A SPACE-SAVING AVALANCHE DEFENCE STRUCTURE

Lake Erie Commerce Center Traffic Analysis

Morning Star Peak Avalanche Accident

Ski / Sled tracks as an expression of avalanche risk Jordy Hendrikx 1 & Jerry Johnson 2,1 1.

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Coral Springs Charter High School and Middle School Job No Page 2

PURPOSE AND NEED (CONCURRENCE POINT 1) NEW CANADA ROAD PROJECT FROM STATE ROUTE 1 (U.S. HIGHWAY 70) TO U.S. INTERSTATE 40

Below is an example of a well laid-out template of a route card used by the Sionnach Team which is a good format to begin with.

CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE. By Mike Curran, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand

Organization Date. Sound Regional Council Regional Project Evaluation Committee. Brian Nielsen, Program Administrator

Avalanche Prevention

Going-to-the-Sun Road, Glacier National Park, MT, USA Avalanche Path Atlas

Avalanche Awareness and Leading a Companion Rescue

Shrubs and alpine meadows represent the only vegetation cover.

Mt. Thielsen Trip Report: April 29, 2012

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Twin Lakes Avalanche Incident 1/31/2016

Henderson Mountain Avalanche Accident Two riders caught, one partially buried, one fully buried

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Breckenridge, Colorado, 2016 ANALYSIS OF UTAH AVALANCHE FATALITIES IN THE MODERN ERA

SNOW DOUGHNUTS, BEACON CHECKERS, BLAST TRAILERS AND OTHER LOW COST TOOLS FROM THE FIELD

Transportation Engineering -II Dr. Rajat Rastogi Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology - Roorkee

Figure 1 Understanding Map Contours

Section 3-04 Cross Sectional Elements TABLE OF CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION...3 General...3 Exhibit 1-Cross-Sectional Elements...3

Exit 148 (Quantico) to Exit 133 (Route 17/Fredericksburg)

Treasure Island Supplemental Information Report Addendum

AVIATION RULES OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC APKR-6 "OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT" Annex 6 Flight time limitations and flight duty time 01-Sep-2016

Blackburn Road Blackburn Level Crossing Removal. Frequently Asked Questions August 2014 GENERAL

Northfield to Ingle Farm #2 66 kv Sub transmission line

Exit 136 (Centreport Parkway/Stafford County) to Exit 130 (Route 3/Fredericksburg)

FOR LARGE DESIGN WAVE HEIGHTS

Frequently Asked Questions on the Route 29 Solutions Improvements Projects

Appendix B CLEAR ZONES AND ACCIDENT POTENTIAL ZONES

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

Section 3.6 Recreation

Northeast Stoney Trail In Calgary, Alberta

Innovations in Aviation Flow Management REDUCING CONGESTION AND INCREASING CAPACITY

Part 137. Agricultural Aircraft Operations. CAA Consolidation. 10 March Published by the Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand

Debris Flow & Shallow Landslide Protection

9 CONSTRUCTION OF BATHURST STREET FROM GREEN LANE WEST TO SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 11, TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY AND TOWNSHIP OF KING

Using of space technologies for glacierand snow- related hazards studies

D1 January 8, 2014 Public Hearing APPLICANT: HUNT CLUB FARM

BLASTING GLACIAL ICE AND SNOW ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT. Copyright Environment Canada, Canadian Parks Service, 1989

FHWA P/N Guidelines. Corridor Relationship. Highway 22 Segment 1 - US 169 to CSAH 2 Relevance / Documentation of Need

12, 14 and 16 York Street - Amendments to Section 16 Agreement and Road Closure Authorization

Airport Master Plan Update June 15, 2017

Conservatory Roof Structural Information Guide

Airport Master Plan Update June 15, 2017

Mapping the Snout. Subjects. Skills. Materials

TEACHER PAGE Trial Version

Business Growth (as of mid 2002)

SLOPE CALCULATION. Wilderness Trekking School 1

Transcription:

I-90 SNOQUALMIE PASS: OPERATING A HIGHWAY AVALANCHE PROGRAM DURING A MAJOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT John Stimberis, Washington State Department of Transportation ABSTRACT: Snoqualmie Pass, WA (921m) receives an average of 1100 cm of snowfall annually. Interstate 90 over Snoqualmie Pass is the major highway through the Cascade Mountains of Washington State, with traffic volumes averaging nearly 30,000 vehicles per day and peak volumes exceeding 50,000. Numerous avalanche paths affect I-90 in the vicinity of Snoqualmie Pass. Avalanche delays and closures have an economic impact that often exceeds several million dollars (USD), depending on the length of the closures. The area with the most active avalanche paths has a two-lane snow shed covering the westbound lanes; eastbound lanes are fully exposed to the avalanche hazard. Up to 40 avalanche control missions may occur at this site each winter. The existing two-lane snow shed will be replaced as part of a $550 million (USD) highway expansion project. Construction plans include replacing the existing snow shed with a larger shed or a bridge. Approximately 1500m of snow supporting structures will be installed in adjacent avalanche zones. The construction season runs from May through October and is suspended during the winter due to snowfall and avalanche hazards. The 6-month construction season will not allow enough time for demolition of the existing snow shed and construction of the replacement structures. Thus, the affected area will be left without avalanche defensive structures for one to two winters. In this paper we will examine the challenges and possible solutions that the WSDOT Avalanche Forecasting and Control program faces. In addition we will provide a more detailed look at the proposed structures and their impacts to the future of our highway avalanche program. KEYWORDS: snow sheds, avalanche fences, explosives tramways, avalanche forecasting, avalanche control 1. INTRODUCTION Snoqualmie Pass, WA (921m) is the major cross mountain transportation route in WA State (Figure 1). The area is characterized by a maritime snowpack with abundant snowfall and mild temperatures (McClung and Schaerer, 2006). The WSDOT snow study plot on Snoqualmie Pass reports an average of 1100 cm of snowfall each year and 2500 mm of precipitation. Major winters can produce up to 2000 cm of snowfall. Maximum snowpack is usually reached by late March and averages 2.5 m, though peak snow cover has exceeded 4 meters on occasion. Rain on snow events are common most years at pass elevation. *Corresponding author address: John Stimberis, WSDOT, P.O. Box 1008, Snoqualmie Pass, WA 98068, 509-577-1909, stimbej@wsdot.wa.gov Interstate 90, the highway crossing Snoqualmie Pass, rises 300 meters over 6 km as it reaches the summit area. The final grade often crosses through the transition from rain to snow, complicating traction on the highway. Traffic volumes on I-90 have risen steadily over the years, increasing nearly 40% in the past two decades. Current winter average daily traffic volume (ADT) exceeds 25,000 vehicles. Large trucks comprise at least 15% of the total volume, though the ratio of passenger cars to trucks varies considerable by hour of day and day of week. Winter holidays and summer 547

Figure 1.Snoqualmie Pass Vicinity: A- Granite Mtn., B- Denny Mtn., C- West Shed/Airplane Curve, D- Dodge Ridge, E- WSDOT study plot, F- East Shed, G- Slide Curve. Primary weather stations are shown with asterisks. weekends often report traffic volumes exceeding 50,000 vehicles (Figure 2). Delays to traffic are common due to the large influx of vehicles; congestion and collisions are the main culprits during summer months. Winter travel volumes, though less than summer, often experience more frequent delays due to adverse weather, traction issues, and avalanche related closures. The terrain surrounding I-90 is steep and in places rises up to 900 meters above the roadway. I-90 crosses nearly 30 avalanche paths in the Snoqualmie Pass vicinity. Static avalanche defensive structures are limited to two locations. The WSDOT employs a crew of avalanche forecast and control specialists to monitor conditions and mitigate the avalanche risk. Figure 2. Winter traffic volume on Snoqualmie Pass, WA Avalanche return periods vary greatly from path to path with some areas having return periods on the 548

order of once every 5-10 years to several avalanche paths with return periods estimated to exceed 10 avalanches per winter. The areas of most significant concern are the East Shed avalanche paths (Figure 1). Here, a snow shed covers the two westbound lanes but the eastbound lanes are fully exposed to avalanches (Figure 3). The East Shed area experiences the majority of avalanche control, averaging 20 missions per winter. Traffic delays related to avalanches at the East Shed totaled 46 hours during the 2011-2012 winter, and contributed to longer pass-wide closures exceeding 8o hours. Total delays to traffic due to avalanche work exceeded 108 hours during the 2011-2012 winter, and the East Shed accounted for nearly 75% of the total. Figure 3. Eastbound lanes of I-90 are exposed to avalanches at the East Shed 2. TRANSPORTATION CONCERNS The avalanche-hazard index (AHI) is a weighted numeric expression determined by multiplying the frequencies of vehicles being hit by various types of avalanches (Schaerer, 1989).The AHI for an active avalanche area with high traffic volumes is anticipated to be quite high. We are currently calculating the AHI for the East Shed area without the snow shed in place. We anticipate a very high AHI even with an active avalanche forecast and control program. Although trained and experienced forecasters go to great lengths to eliminate avalanche risk natural avalanches are still encountered; it is estimated that explosive control reduces natural avalanches by 90% (Schaerer, 1989). The biggest contributors to a high avalanche risk at the East Shed paths are a frequently producing avalanche path and in particular an ADT that often exceeds 25,000. I-90 over Snoqualmie Pass has a variable speed limit to allow for changing weather conditions, but when the road is free of snow and ice the speed limit is usually raised to 95 km/h for trucks and 105 km/h for autos (60 and 65 mph respectively). High rates of speed increase the consequences if a vehicle encounters an avalanche blocking the highway. Traffic volumes, snow and ice issues, and avalanches cause avoidable delays to traffic and commerce on Snoqualmie Pass. The WSDOT has designed a highway expansion project to resolve a number of these issues by increasing travel lanes, improving the highway design, allowing for additional snow storage, and mitigating avalanches. The total cost of improvements for the 8 km project area exceeds $550 million USD, with the avalanche mitigation accounting for $45-50 million USD (Scott Golbeck WSDOT Project Engineer, personal communications). The original plans called for the removal of the current two-lane snow shed and replacing it with a larger six-lane structure. A proposal to construct a bridge in lieu of the snow shed was proposed and is currently under review. Additionally, over 1500 meters of snow fences will be installed throughout this section of highway, mainly in the Slide Curve location (Figure 4). The snow fences anchor the snowpack preventing avalanche release. The final result of the I-90 construction project is improved traffic flow and reduced avalanche risk. Total avalanche control may be reduced by up to 85% on Snoqualmie Pass. Avalanche control within the project area will mostly be eliminated. The construction project is expected to be completed by 2016. Construction and reconfiguration of the highway presents a challenge to WSDOT during the summer construction season and the winter snow and ice maintenance season. Most winter issues are related to traffic and snow removal due to lane and shoulder restrictions created during the construction season. 549

commonly used is known as Jersey Barrier, a reinforced concrete barrier 82 cm high by 385 cm length with a 3000 kg mass. It is expected that the barriers will be easily displaced by flowing avalanches (Figure 5). It s also expected that size 2 and larger avalanches will deposit debris on all four travel lanes requiring more extensive clean up than is currently encountered. Debris cleanup and realignment of the concrete barrier will extend delays to traffic. Figure 4. Slide Curve Avalanche Paths will receive the majority the proposed snow fences The existing snow shed will be removed during the summer of 2014 and there will not be enough time to complete the replacement, thus during the winter of 2014-2015 the WSDOT will operate I-90 without any snow shed for the first time in more than 70 years. The highway configuration and absence of the snow shed will complicate highway operations in several ways; most notable will be avalanche debris removal and the presence of a center divider within the active avalanche areas. Both issues will likely increase the delay times, again complicating highway operations as traffic will need to be stopped in the outlying communities 20-50 km away. 3. OUTCOME Presently the construction plans for 2014-2015 will leave our avalanche program with a 10-12 meter wide catchment between the cut slope and the highway where the snow shed once stood. Four lanes of travel, two west bound and two east bound, will be maintained with limited shoulders. There will be a 15-18 m drop from the most active avalanche track to the bottom of the catchment. The catchment may prove effective at stopping small avalanches, or sluffs. Size 2+ avalanches (destructive force, SWAG 2010) will most certainly affect the travel lanes of I-90. Highway standards require a center barrier to be in place for travel division. The center barrier Figure 5. Example of small wet-loose avalanche impact on concrete barriers 3.1 Highway Operations Standard operating procedures on I-90, Snoqualmie Pass are to minimize local traffic delays to less than 90 minutes. Thus, under normal avalanche control operations at the East Shed the WSDOT Maintenance crews stop traffic several kilometers from the avalanche zone. Traffic remains in these locations while avalanche control and cleanup is performed. As the duration of the traffic delay increases so does the length of the traffic queue. These longer delays further impact traffic and road conditions by increasing the amount of time that it takes for traffic to clear following an avalanche closure and by limiting the amount of road maintenance that can be completed during the delay. Furthermore the mountainous terrain limits the amount of acceptable locations where traffic can be stopped. Stopping traffic on a steeper gradient often complicates the closure; collisions may occur when vehicles attempt to stop on a downhill 550

gradient, or they may lose traction when attempting to restart on an uphill gradient. As the length of the traffic queue increases the Maintenance crews will often stop traffic at further location below a major grade. Additional closures require more personnel to staff the closures and the waiting traffic have limited access to facilities or provisions. When delays or closures are expected to extend beyond 90 minutes the Maintenance crews will choose to stop traffic in the outlying communities of North Bend, WA 30 km to the west and several locations east of Snoqualmie Pass ranging from 25 to 80 km away, depending on the anticipated delay and volume of traffic. These types of closures allow motorists access to facilities and the ability to reroute their travel. Closures in the outlying communities also allow the maintenance crews to continue with snow removal on the highway in anticipation of reopening. The drawback to these extended closures is the cost to commerce from delayed shipments or the added cost of fuel from a lengthy detour. Delays to commerce and the risk of avalanches are two of the primary reasons for the Hyak East Construction project. 3.2 Avalanche Operations WSDOT Avalanche crews determine when to perform avalanche control based on when snow pack instability will be most receptive to explosives. The forecasting dilemma extends beyond instability and into traffic management as well. Peak instability may coincide with peak traffic flow; therefore a careful decision must be made. These challenges will be more complicated with the removal of the snow shed due to extended closures for avalanche debris removal. Avalanche impacts to the Jersey barrier and the volume of snow on the highway will be important considerations regarding how long the highway will remain closed. The forecaster will need to look beyond instability and forecast how much snow is likely to reach the highway and thus where traffic will be stopped. Greater impacts to the highway will require traffic to be stopped in the outlying communities. Socio-political pressures will increase as the avalanche delays lengthen and become more frequent, further complicating the decision making process. One way to reduce the impacts to the highway is to reduce the amount of snow reaching the highway from avalanche control missions. More frequent control work has the potential to reduce the volume of avalanche debris. The WSDOT already employs this concept and regularly performs more frequent control on the East Shed 3 and 4 avalanches paths. Quite often delays will be minimal due to a limited amount of avalanche debris cleanup. Removal of the snow shed will mean more snow to remove as the westbound lanes will be exposed. Overall though more frequent control is likely to reduce avalanche volumes. A possible drawback to more frequent control is the risk of performing avalanche control too frequently and creating a false sense of security. WSDOT utilizes a series of explosive deliver trams to perform avalanche control in the East Shed area. Each of these trams delivers 12 Kg of explosives into fixed positions within the avalanche paths. The explosives are very effective at removing snow from the starting zones due to the size of the charge and location relative to starting zone geometry. With more frequent control snow will undoubtedly be removed from the upper starting zones. Additional snow and instabilities may remain in the upper track and some of the smaller feeder paths; snow that is often removed when moderate or larger avalanches are released. An additional explosive delivery tram will be added to the East Shed 4 path to deliver explosives deeper into the upper track. The WSDOT will plan and prepare for the 2014-2015 winter internally from an operational standpoint and externally to their customers. Ultimately the outcome will depend on the weather and snowfall. Weather patterns and specific snow events are important factors driving instability, particularly for an avalanche control program. Timing is essential to getting the best results from avalanche control. Heavily controlled avalanche 551

paths exhibit different snow structure characteristics than neighboring areas where less or no avalanche control is performed. Specific attention must be made to these differences. Additionally there are the logistical considerations regarding how long a closure may last based on the estimated impact of the avalanche debris and the volume of snow to be removed. These additional considerations are sure to test the abilities of the avalanche forecasting crew and the patience of travelers during this potentially trying winter season. REFERENCES McClung, D.M. and P.A. Schaerer. 2006. The Avalanche Handbook. Seattle, WA, The Mountaineers, 22. Schaerer, P. A. The Avalanche-Hazard Index. Annals of Glaciology 13 p. 241-247, International Glaciological Society, Cambridge, U.K., 1989 American Avalanche Assoc., 2010 Snow Weather and Avalanches: Observational Guidelines for Avalanche Programs in the United States. American Avalanche Assoc., Pagosa Springs, CO 552