Typical avalanche problems

Similar documents
Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Breckenridge, Colorado, 2016

Avalanche danger high in parts of NCW

In southern Upper Valais a very high avalanche danger will be encountered in some regions Edition: , 08:00 / Next update: 9.1.

Avalanche Awareness and Leading a Companion Rescue

Avalanche Safety Guidelines

Elevation Bands Description of terrain characteristics to which the avalanche danger ratings apply.

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Banff, 2014

Avalanche Accident Report

NWAC Blog. Cornices - don't walk the line! Written by Robert Hahn on March 14, Last update on May 15, 2017.

American Avalanche Association Forest Service National Avalanche Center Avalanche Incident Report: Short Form

Avalanche Safety Guidelines This guideline is intended as a general introduction to this topic.

Excelsior Pass Avalanche Accident January 1, 2008

American Avalanche Association Forest Service National Avalanche Center Avalanche Incident Report: Long Form

Twin Lakes Avalanche Incident 1/31/2016

Henderson Mountain Avalanche Accident Two riders caught, one partially buried, one fully buried

AVALANCHE TERRAIN. Bill Glude Alaska Avalanche Specialists All photos and graphics Bill Glude unless otherwise noted.

Morning Star Peak Avalanche Accident

International Snow Science Workshop

Park Butte Avalanche Fatality March 10 th, 2018

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Breckenridge, Colorado, 2016 ANALYSIS OF UTAH AVALANCHE FATALITIES IN THE MODERN ERA

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS OF AVALANCHES: PRELIMINARY RESEARCH IN GLACIER NATIONAL PARK

Swede Creek Avalanche Incident Report Swede Creek, Whitefish Range, MT Date of Avalanche: 23 January 2016 Date of Site Visit: 24 January 2016

SYNOPSIS WEATHER AND SNOWPACK

Washington Explorer Search and Rescue Pierce County Unit February 2013

Corona Bowl Avalanche Incident, December 6th, 2015

Twin Peaks Near Miss Report Turnagain Pass, Kenai Mountains, Alaska

AN AVALANCHE CHARACTERIZATION CHECKLIST FOR BACKCOUNTRY TRAVEL DECISIONS. Roger Atkins* Canadian Mountain Holidays

Slot Couloir Accident, Snoqualmie Mt

Avalanche Bulletin Interpretation Guide

2/16/2014 Idaho Frenchman Creek Published by Scott Savage, SAC

Number Caught: 2 Partially Buried, Non-Critical: 1 Partially Buried, Critical: 0 Fully Buried: 1 Injured: 1 Killed: 1

Avalanche accident case study: Persistent buried weak layer in the Central Idaho Mountains

Chapter 7 Snow and ice

Part 1: Introduction to Decision Making

Granite Mountain Avalanche Fatality, December 31st, 2015 Report prepared by NWAC

AVALANCHE INSTRUCTOR S MANUAL TAB: TEST BANK CHAPTER 9. UPDATED VERSION AVALANCHE TEST BANK (without answers) January 1999

Going-to-the-Sun Road, Glacier National Park, MT, USA Avalanche Path Atlas

LEVEL 1 - AVALANCHE OVERVIEW HANDOUT

Example of the layout of a Fieldwork Atlas

THRESHOLD GUIDELINES FOR AVALANCHE SAFETY MEASURES

Cottonwood Lake Avalanche Fatality February, 25th 2018

Snow Lake Divide Avalanche Fatality February 25th, 2018

Avalanche Mountain Incident March 4 th, 2017

FRANCE : HOW TO IMPROVE THE AVALANCHE KNOWLEDGE OF MOUNTAIN GUIDES? THE ANSWER OF THE FRENCH MOUNTAIN GUIDES ASSOCIATION. Alain Duclos 1 TRANSMONTAGNE

23 rd National Avalanche School Snowbird Ski and Summer Resort, UT October 27-31,2013. Student Prework

Twin Wildcat Lakes Avalanche Wednesday, February 1, 2012 Incident Report

Crystal Mountain Snow Safety Union Creek Avalanche Accident Report December 2, 2007

Self-Guided Group Organization - Recommendations

TEACHER PAGE Trial Version

THE DANGERATOR: A METHOD FOR ESTIMATING AVALANCHE DANGER IN AREAS WITH NO PUBLIC AVALANCHE FORECAST

THE SME AVALANCHE TRAGEDY OF JANUARY 20, 2003: A SUMMARY OF THE DATA. Dick Penniman* Snowbridge Associates Frank Baumann Baumann Engineering

Alaska Avalanche Information Center (AAIC) Season Summary Statewide AAIC Outreach Stats: ANCHORAGE (AAC)

Introduction to Safety on Glaciers in Svalbard

Ski / Sled tracks as an expression of avalanche risk Jordy Hendrikx 1 & Jerry Johnson 2,1 1.

NivoTest : a personal assistant for avalanche risk assessment

Skyland Avalanche Saturday, February 25, 2012 Incident Report

Avalanche Forecasting for Transportation Corridor and Backcountry in Glacier National Park (BC, Canada)

Avalanche Observations

Tidewater Glaciers: McCarthy 2018 Notes

Region 1 Piney Woods

A conceptual model of avalanche hazard

International Snow Science Workshop

GLACIER STUDIES OF THE McCALL GLACIER, ALASKA

The Potentially Dangerous Glacial Lakes

READING QUESTIONS: Glaciers GEOL /WI 60 pts. a. Alpine Ice from larger ice masses flowing through a valley to the ocean

READING QUESTIONS: Chapter 7, Glaciers GEOL 131 Fall pts. a. Alpine Ice from larger ice masses flowing through a valley to the ocean

Unit 1: Physical Environment Glaciated Landscapes

Mt. Thielsen Trip Report: April 29, 2012

Glaciers Earth 9th Edition Chapter 18 Mass wasting: summary in haiku form Glaciers Glaciers Glaciers Glaciers Formation of glacial ice

Instruction Manual. A step-by-step guide to building your own igloo. Andy Meldrum All rights are reserved.

AVALANCHE SAFETY PLAN

The Kendall Trap. Charlie Hagedorn

Glaciers. Clicker Question. Glaciers and Glaciation. How familiar are you with glaciers? West Greenland. Types of Glaciers.

Glaciers. Glacier Dynamics. Glaciers and Glaciation. East Greenland. Types of Glaciers. Chapter 16

glacier Little Ice Age continental glacier valley glacier ice cap glaciation firn glacial ice plastic flow basal slip Chapter 14

TUPPER DESIGNATED ACCESS ROUTE

Glaciers. Glacier Dynamics. Glacier Dynamics. Glaciers and Glaciation. Types of Glaciers. Chapter 15

Copyright 2018 by the Sierra Avalanche Center

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Breckenridge, Colorado, 2016

Proceedings, 2012 International Snow Science Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska

Guthega to Mt Twynam. 2183m. 1583m. 6 hrs 45 mins 14.8 km Return. Experienced only. 913m

Avalanche Incident on Twin Peaks Flint Creek Range December 24, 2013

Characterizing the nature and variability of avalanche hazard in western Canada

MP : the top of the bottom switchback

50miler.com Outing Resource Center on Facebook

SNOW AVALANCHE AVOIDANCE POLICY 2011

Glaciers and Glaciation Earth - Chapter 18 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

50miler.com Outing Resource Center on Facebook

Kurt Winkler 1, Tobias Kuhn 2, Martin Volk 3

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Banff, 2014 THE WISDOM OF CROWDS IN AVALANCHE FORECASTING. Bruce Tremper 1 * and Paul Diegel 1

Snow camping: Once you try building an ice shelter, you just may dig it

a. The historic avalanche areas, or areas in which there exists clear evidence of previous avalanches, are mapped.

2010 International Snow Science Workshop

Glaciers. Reading Practice

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PERTAINING TO STEEL WIRE ROPE NET SYSTEMS FOR THE PREVENTION OF SNOW AVALANCHES1. Robert A. Thommen, Jr.

Snowpack Part III. Stability Evaluation and Keeping Field Notes

Snow Way by Beth Geiger

Chasing Skylines in Kyrgyzstan BMC Reference: 15/ 02

Waterproof Debris Shelter

GOLDEN EARS PROVINCIAL PARK

Transcription:

Typical avalanche problems The European Avalanche Warning Services (EAWS) describes five typical avalanche problems or situations as they occur in avalanche terrain. The Utah Avalanche Center (UAC) has adopted this set of problems and made minor edits to the original document to suit regional variations. Two additional problems have been added for use in specific situations in Utah. These are Cornice and Normal Caution. Because these two may be used by UAC, they have been added to this document. Many avalanche centers in North America use the term avalanche problem to refer a set of four factors that includes the type of avalanche expected, location, likelihood, and size. Avalanche problem is used in a more basic sense in this document. The nine avalanche types used by many North American avalanche centers are included as expected avalanche types under each problem.

New snow What? Characteristics The avalanche problem is related to current or most recent snowfall. The amount of additional loading by new snow onto the existing is the crucial factor of the new snow problem. How critical the loading is depends on various factors such as air temperature or characteristics of the old snow surface. Expected avalanche types Storm slab avalanches Loose dry avalanches Natural and human triggered avalanches Where? Spatial distribution Often widely present and on all aspects. of the old. Why? Release characteristics Dry snow slab Additional load due to snowfall on existing weak layers (old snow surface or below) or newly created weak layers (within the new snow) Usually at or close to the interface with the old snow surface, sometimes in the new snow layers and sometimes slightly below in the upper layers Dry loose snow Lack of cohesion between the new snow particles When? Duration Typically during snowfall and up to a few days after. Identification of the situation in The new snow problem is fairly easy to recognize since it affects most of the terrain. Consider critical amounts of new snow and recent avalanche activity. Dry snow slab Wait until the has stabilized and the weak layer has adapted to the new load and gained strength. Dry loose snow Danger of falling is more important than danger of burial. Consider consequences in steep terrain.

Wind-drifted snow What? Characteristics The avalanche situation is related to wind-drifted snow. Snow can be transported by wind with or without a concurrent snowfall. Expected avalanche types Wind slab avalanches Natural and human triggered avalanches Where? Spatial distribution Highly variable but typically on leeward slopes in gullies, bowls, near distinct changes in slope angle, behind ridgelines or other wind-sheltered locations. More common above treeline. Usually at or close to the interface to the old snow surface or within the slab layer due to variations in wind speed during storm cycle, but occasionally also slightly below in the old. Why? Release characteristics Wind-drifted snow is an additional load on a weak layer and builds a slab that is particularly prone to support crack propagation. When? Duration The wind-drifted snow situation can evolve very quickly and typically lasts during the snowdrift event, up to a few days at most, depending on evolution. Identification of the problem in If not hidden by new snow the wind-drifted snow problem can be recognized with training and good visibility. Look for signs of wind-drifted snow. Typical clues: snowdrifts, smooth and rounded deposits, recent avalanche activity, and often shooting cracks or whumphs. However, it is often hard to determine the age of wind deposits and wind deposits do not necessarily imply an avalanche problems (e.g., in absence of a weak layer). Avoid wind-drifted snow in steep terrain.

Persistent weak layers What? Characteristics The avalanche problem is related to the presence of one or more persistent weak layers in the old. These weak layers typically include faceted crystals, depth hoar or surface hoar Expected avalanche types Soft or hard dry-snow slab avalanches Persistent Slab or Deep slab avalanches Natural and human triggered avalanches Large, destructive and dangerous avalanches when the weak layer is deeply buried. Where? Spatial distribution The avalanche problem can be widespread or quite isolated. It can exist in all aspects, but is most frequently found on shady slopes. Anywhere in the old, including at the ground. When deeply buried triggering becomes less likely, but avalanches larger. Why? Release characteristics Release of avalanche occurs when loading exceeds the strength of the weak layer. They are most sensitive right after loading, but also triggered with light loads and weeks after the last storm. Deeply buried persistent weak layers are often triggered from where the snow is shallow and weak. When? Duration Weak layers can persist for weeks to months; possibly most of the winter season. Identification of the situation in Persistent weak layers are very challenging to recognize. Signs of instability such as collapsing and whumps are typical but not necessarily present. Stability tests can be helpful to detect the persistent weak layers. Snowpack history is critical and reference to the published avalanche report is important. Travel conservatively and avoid travel on and below suspect slopes. Remote triggering is possible. Crack propagation over long distances and in surprising and unpredictable ways is common. Consider the history of weather and snow cover processes in the area. Be extra cautious in areas with a thin and at the transition from a deep to a thin. Persistent weak layers are a major cause of avalanche fatalities.

Wet snow What? Characteristics The avalanche problem is related to weakening of the due to the presence of liquid water. Water infiltrates the Where? Why? Expected avalanche types Spatial distribution Position of weak layer in the Release characteristics due to snow melt or rain. Wet slab avalanches Loose wet snow avalanches When melting due to solar radiation is the main cause, distribution of the situation is mostly depending on aspect. The elevation is mainly depending on air temperature and humidity. All aspects are affected in the event of rain on snow. Anywhere in the Wet-snow slab Weakening and failure of pre-existing weak layers in the or release at layer interfaces where the water is pooling Rain also represents an additional load on weak layers Wet loose snow Loss of cohesion between snow crystals When? Duration Hours to days Rapid loss of stability possible Especially critical as water percolates for the first time deeper down, once the has warmed up to 0 C. Natural avalanches might be more likely in the course of the day, depending on aspect (unless rain is the dominating factor). Identification of the situation in The wet snow situation is usually easy to recognize. Onset of rain, snowballing, pin wheeling and small wet slabs or loose wet avalanches are often precursors of natural wet-snow slab avalanche activity. Deep foot-penetration is another sign of increased avalanche potential. If the wet snow surface freezes into a crust during a cold night with clear sky, conditions are usually favourable in the morning. After warm overcast nights the situation often exists already in the morning. Normally rain on fresh snow creates this situation almost immediately. Good timing and trip planning are important. Consider avalanche runout zones.

Gliding snow What? Characteristics The entire is gliding on the ground, typically on smooth ground such as grassy slopes or smooth rock zones. Glide avalanches are typically related to a thick with no or only few layers. The release of a glide avalanche is difficult to predict, although glide cracks commonly exist prior to release. Expected avalanche types Glide avalanches; cold dry or 0 C-isothermal wet Almost exclusively natural avalanches. Human and artificial triggering is unlikely. Where? Spatial distribution Primarily on smooth ground and on slopes of any aspect. Specific slopes may produce glide avalanches each year. Interface between the ground and overlaying. Full depth, climax avalanches result. Why? Release mechanisms Glide-snow avalanches are caused by a loss of adhesion at the snow-ground interface, sometimes with free water at this interface. When? Duration Days to months; occasionally during entire winterseason although more common in late winter into spring. The release can occur at any time day or night, even days after a solid refreeze. Identification of the situation in Glide cracks are often pre-cursors to glide release; however, avalanching without pre-existing glide cracks is also common. Release of indicator slopes is significant. Avoid being on or beneath typically suspect areas or areas with glide cracks. Unpredictable and catastrophic, therefore warranting greater margins of safety.

Cornice What? Characteristics A wave-like formation of soft or hard wind drifted snow, often overhanging. Cornices often break further back than expected, even onto flat ridgelines, and are the cause of many unexpected falls in the mountains. Expected avalanche types Cornice fall avalanches can trigger new snow avalanches, wind slabs, persistent slabs, or wet avalanches on steep slopes below. Where? Spatial distribution Cornices occur on the lee sides of wind-exposed ridgelines or sharp terrain breaks. Drifting extends the cornice outward, so the fresher, sensitive, and more easily triggered part of the cornice is generally near its outer edge. Why? Release mechanisms Natural cornice-fall avalanches are common during windy midwinter storms, as cornices rapidly build outward and become unstable with drifting storm snow. Rapid warming or prolonged melt can cause cornices to become unstable, to buckle and calve. When? Duration Cornices can be an issue once built throughout the season, generally from midwinter through spring. Identification of the situation in People are often lured too far out onto deceptive cornices as they attempt to gain views of slopes below. Avoid travel on and below large ridge top cornices, especially during periods with drifting snow or warm temperatures

Normal Caution This is not a specific avalanche problem. It is used by UAC forecasters most often when avalanche conditions are generally safe and there is no predominate avalanche problem. Any avalanche type is possible but the most common would be wind slab, loose wet, and loose dry avalanches and they would be expected to be small. Do not approach a Normal Caution avalanche problem as an anything goes situation. Continue to keep your guard up and look for any signs of snow instability. Evaluate snow and weather conditions as you travel.