Assignment 7: Airport Geometric Design Standards

Similar documents
! Figure 1. Proposed Cargo Ramp at the end of Taxiway Echo.! Assignment 7: Airport Capacity and Geometric Design. Problem 1

Assignment 10: Final Project

Assignment 3: Runway Length and EMAS Design. Aircraft Engine Remarks. CFM56-7B20/-7B22/-7B24 developing 20,000 lb of thrust at sea level

Airport Geometric Design Standards

CEE 5614 and CEE Aircraft Classifications. Spring 2013

Assignment 2: Runway Length Analysis

PROPOSED HORIZONTAL LAYOUT FILLET DESIGN FOR ENTRANCE/EXIT TAXIWAYS

Airfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Airport Obstruction Standards

Airfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni

DRAFT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

Airport Design-3 Geometric Design

Source: Chippewa Valley Regional Airport ASOS, Period of Record

Aircraft Classifications. Dr. Antonio Trani and Julio Roa Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

CEE Quick Overview of Aircraft Classifications. January 2018

!! CEE 4674 Airport Planning and Design. ! Antonio A. Trani Julio Roa

The offers operators increased capacity while taking advantage of existing airport infrastructure. aero quarterly qtr_03 10

Transportation Engineering -II Dr. Rajat Rastogi Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology - Roorkee

Study Committee Meeting. September 2015

Airport Markings and Lighting

CATCODE ] CATCODE

CEE 4674 Airport Planning and Design. Antonio A. Trani Julio Roa. Punta Cana Ecological Foundation Summer I, 2013

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

Public Information Meeting. September 2015

Quiz 2 - Solution. Problem #1 (50 points) CEE 5614 Fall Date Due: Wednesday November 20, 2013 Instructor: Trani

Airport Runway Location and Orientation. CEE 4674 Airport Planning and Design

AIRSIDE CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

Session. Arrester Systems, Declared Distances and Runway Excursion Prevention

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS

ICAO Standards. Airfield Information Signs. ICAO Annex 14, 4th Edition Aerodrome Design and Operations

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport

Time-Space Analysis Airport Runway Capacity. Dr. Antonio A. Trani. Fall 2017

Chapter 4 Airport Facility Requirements

Facility Requirements

Assignment 9: APM and Queueing Analysis

Analysis of Air Transportation Systems. Airport Capacity

Assignment 6: ETOPS Operations and ATC

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

1) Rescind the MOD (must meet the standard); 2) Issue a new MOD which reaffirms the intent of the previous MOD; 3) Issue a new MOD with revisions.

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

INCREASING AIRPORT OPERATION SAFETY BASED ON UPDATED OR ENHANCED AIRPORT PAVEMENT MARKINGS: A CASE STUDY PAPER

Airport Engineering Lectures

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

USE OF 3D GIS IN ANALYSIS OF AIRSPACE OBSTRUCTIONS

Airport Characteristics. Airport Characteristics

Assignment 3: Route Fleet Assignment Michael D. Wittman

CHAPTER 3 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

Appendix 6.1: Hazard Worksheet

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

TABLE OF CONTENTS. General Study Objectives Public Involvement Issues to Be Resolved

Implementing a Perimeter Taxiway at Dallas Fort Worth International Airport: Evaluation of Operating Policy Impacts

TAKEOFF SAFETY ISSUE 2-11/2001. Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

Facility Requirements

Chapter 5 Facility Requirements

Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Spring 2015 Blacksburg, Virginia

Airfield Capacity Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016

II. Purpose and Need. 2.1 Background

STUDY WORK GROUP MEETING No. 3. November 29, 2016

CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

Description of the National Airspace System

4. Demand/Capacity Assessment and Facility Requirements

Boeing Airplane Overview

Apron. FAC: 1131 CATCODE: OPR: AFCEC/COS OCR: AF/A3O-A 1.1. Description. Aprons are paved areas provided for aircraft parking, servicing, and

TECHNICAL REPORT #3 Palm Beach International Airport Demand/Capacity and Facility Requirements

Demand Patterns; Geometric Design of Airfield Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Analysis of Operational Impacts of Continuous Descent Arrivals (CDA) using runwaysimulator

Chapter III - Demand/Capacity and Facility Requirements

Addendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6)

DEPARTMENT: CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE / Name: CE2303/ Railway, Airport and Harbors Engineering 2 MARK QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

APPENDIX X: RUNWAY LENGTH ANALYSIS

Chapter 14. Design of Flexible Airport Pavements AC 150/5320-6D

National Transportation Safety Board Washington, D.C

3.0 Facility Requirements

Regional Jets ,360 A319/ , , , ,780

Chapter Six ALP Drawings. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

Chapter 4 AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES

D.1 Introduction. Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport

APPENDIX D MSP Airfield Simulation Analysis

CHAPTER D Capacity Analysis and Facility Requirements INTRODUCTION

Agenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3

4.0 AIRFIELD CAPACITY & FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

JUNEAU RUNWAY INCURSION MITIGATION (RIM) PROGRAM. April 10 th 2017

EUROCAE ED-250: ROAAS MOPS

767 Airplane Characteristics for. Airport Planning. Boeing Commercial Airplanes. D SEPTEMBER 2005 i

PUBLIC NOTICE OF PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE FOR DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

Hartford-Brainard Airport Potential Runway Closure White Paper

Chapter 4 Airport Capacity Assessment and Identification of Facility Needs

ICAO Recommended Airport Signs, Runway And Taxiway Markings. COPYRIGHT JEPPESEN SANDERSON, INC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Revision Date:

Las Vegas McCarran International Airport. Capacity Enhancement Plan

CHAPTER 5 - FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

October 2014 BELLINGHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN PRESENTATION

SIMMOD Simulation Airfield and Airspace Simulation Report. Oakland International Airport Master Plan Preparation Report. Revised: January 6, 2006

Session Best Practices Amendments From Annex14, Volume I Annex 15. Runway Incursions Runway Excursions

V.D. Taxiing. References: FAA-H ; POH/AFM

Transcription:

CEE 4674: Airport Planning and Design Spring 2018 Date Due: March 23, 2018 Instructor: Trani Problem 1 Assignment 7: Airport Geometric Design Standards An airport is designing a new pier terminal to accommodate five Airbus A350-1000 passenger planes simultaneously per side (see Figure 1 - only 3 per side shown). The airport authority needs to know the dimensions (A through G and also radii R1 and R2) of the apron area shown in Figure 1. In your solution consider the maneuvering envelopes of the Airbus A350-1000 using the appropriate technical data. Design and draw to scale (no hand sketches will be accepted) your solution. Provide 30 feet of clearance between the nose of the aircraft and the terminal building. Clearly state all the dimensions in your drawing. Note that a two-lane service road is provided behind the parking positions of A350-1000 as shown in Figure 1. If desired, DWG files for the Airbus A350-1000 can be found at: http://www.airbus.com/aircraft/support-services/airport-operations-and-technical-data/ autocad-3-view-aircraft-drawings.html. Figure 1. Proposed Airport Terminal Configuration. CEE 4674 Trani Page 1! of 5!

Problem 2 The purpose of this analysis is to locate three high-speed exits for a runway at an airport with a fleet mix shown in Table 1. The critical aircraft is a Boeing 787-8 shown in Figure 2. The runway designed to be 3,000 meters long. Use the Three-Point Method Matlab computer program provided in class (http://128.173.204.63/courses/cee4674/cee4674_pub/ ThreePointMethod_stochastic.m). In your design consider the typical operational exit speeds recommended in class. In your design, selects the runway locations to accommodate 85% of the landings simulated. The data shown in Table 1 has been collected by Virginia Tech Air Transportation Lab at several airports in the country. Figure 2. Japan Airlines Boeing 787-8 in Tow at Tokyo Narita International Airport (A. Trani). Table 1. Estimated Aircraft Landing Roll Characteristics for Runway Exit Design. Aircraft Landing Technical Characteristics Boeing 787-8 Mean approach speed = 148 knots Approach speed std deviation = 3.1 knots Free roll time = 4.5 seconds Mean touchdown distance = 520 m Std. Dev. Touchdown distance = 60 m Mean braking rate = -1.70 m/s-s Transition segment deceleration = 0.35 m/s-s Airbus A320 Mean approach speed = 136 knots Approach speed std deviation = 2.4 knots Free roll time = 4.5 seconds Mean touchdown distance = 510 m Std. Dev. Touchdown distance = 53 m Mean braking rate = -1.8 m/s-s Transition segment deceleration = 0.4 m/s-s CEE 4674 Trani Page 2! of 5!

Aircraft Landing Technical Characteristics Bombardier Q400 Mean approach speed = 115 knots Approach speed std deviation = 2.3 knots Free roll time = 4.0 seconds Mean touchdown distance = 450 m Std. Dev. Touchdown distance = 50 m Mean braking rate = -1.70 m/s-s Transition segment deceleration = 0.4 m/s-s a) Plot the Three Cumulative Exit Distance curves (one for each aircraft) and clearly state the selected runway exit locations (i.e., the distance from the runway threshold to the point of curvature of each runway exit). b) Provide (do not draw) all relevant dimensions of the high-speed runway exit based on the critical aircraft (only one for all three exits). State the Taxiway Design Group used. c) Estimate the percent of Boeing 787-8 aircraft that could take the second high-speed exit (i.e., one designed for A320s). d) Compare the runway exit locations Points of Curvature of your design with the locations of three high-speed exit locations at Chicago O Hare runway 10C - designated P3, P5 and P6 (see diagram in Figure 3). Comment. e) Design a 90-degree runway exit to catch all aircraft that are not able to take anyone of the three high-speed. Select the exit location so that the 90-degree runway exit does not overlap with the last high-speed exit. f) What is the recommended distance between the new runway centerline and the parallel taxiway at the airport? Explain. Figure 3. Runways 10C and 10L at Chicago O Hare International Airport. CEE 4674 Trani Page 3! of 5!

Problem 3 Before solving this problem, read carefully paragraph 407 in the FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13A. a) Specify (do not draw) the dimensions of a crossover taxiway shown in Figure 4 using the FAA taxiway design methods contained in Chapter 4 of the Advisory Circular 5300-13A. The critical aircraft is the Boeing 747-8i. Specify all dimensions shown in Figure 4 considering the critical aircraft operating at the airport. b) Briefly contrast the dimensional standards used in this design and those used in Problem 2. Figure 4. General Layout of a Crossover Taxiway (source: FAA AC 150/5300-13A Figure 4-16). Problem 4 Use Google Earth to answer the following questions. a) Estimate the critical FAA ADG group operating at ORD Airport and parking between terminals G and H (see Figure 5). Note that a dual taxi lane is provided between terminals G and H. b) Estimate the critical FAA ADG group operating at ORD Airport on taxiways Alpha and Bravo (see Figure 5). Alpha and Bravo are perimeter taxiways around the terminals at the airport. CEE 4674 Trani Page 4! of 5!

Figure 5. Terminals G (left) and H (right) at ORD Airport. Terminal G Terminal H Alpha Bravo Figure 6. Perimeter Taxiways at ORD Airport. These taxiways are Designated Alpha (inner taxiway) and Bravo (outer). CEE 4674 Trani Page 5! of 5!