Northwest Timberlands

Similar documents
Northwest Timberlands

Northwest Timberlands

Kingcome Timber Supply Area Economic Operability Assessment

Robson Valley Avalanche Tract Mapping Project

FINGER-TATUK PROVINCIAL PARK

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

Labrador - Island Transmission Link Target Rare Plant Survey Locations

Classifications, Inventory and Level of Service

AURORA WILDLIFE RESEARCH

Analysing data on protected areas

Rainfall Appendix. Summary Statistics of Rainfall Data for Sites in the West-Central Florida. A Simple Conceptualized Rainfall/Discharge Relationship

State of Nature 2016

Okanagan Shuswap LRMP

Bayview Escarpment. Interim Management Statement

ATM Network Performance Report

(Also known as the Den-Ice Agreements Program) Evaluation & Advisory Services. Transport Canada

BLANKET CREEK PROVINCIAL PARK

MANAGEMENT DIRECTION STATEMENT March 2003

A GIS Analysis of Probable High Recreation Use Areas in Three Sisters Wilderness Deschutes and Willamette National Forests

Lake Trout Population Assessment Wellesley Lake 1997, 2002, 2007

CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PPCR/SC.4/5 October 9, Meeting of the PPCR Sub-Committee Washington, D.C. October 28, REVIEW OF ON-GOING WORK OF THE MDBs IN DJIBOUTI

Tolko Industries Ltd. Southern Interior Forest Stewardship Plan

PRIORITY HABITAT SURVEY 2017 SWALEDALE. Summary. July 2018

OCTOPUS ISLANDS PROVINCIAL PARK

APPENDIX 18-D 2010 AND 2011 MOUNTAIN GOAT AERIAL SURVEYS, BRUCEJACK PROJECT

RESEARCH AND PLANNING FORT STEELE HERITAGE TOWN VISITOR STUDY 2007 RESULTS. May 2008

Draft Protocol for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Mountain Goat Winter Ranges

D IRECTION S TATEMENT

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

ANAGEMENT P LAN. February, for Elk Lakes and Height of the Rockies Provincial Parks. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks BC Parks Division

Chapter 9: National Parks and Protected Areas

Nakina Moraine Provincial Park. Interim Management Statement. Ontario. Ministry of Natural Resources

2004 SOUTH DAKOTA MOTEL AND CAMPGROUND OCCUPANCY REPORT and INTERNATIONAL VISITOR SURVEY

Water Quality Trends for Patchogue Bay

D IRECTION S TATEMENT

Bridge River Delta Park. Management Plan. Final Public Review Draft

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

Project No Brent Cross, Cricklewood London, UK Phase 1A North RMA

Guidance for Usage of Issue Papers

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

Hermosa Area Preservation The Colorado Trail Foundation 4/11/2008

Accommodation Survey: November 2009

APPENDIX 3-I-B. Alternative Route Assessment Around Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

Bill S-5: An Act to amend the Canada National Parks Act (Nááts ihch oh National Park Reserve of Canada)

MARBLE RIVER PROVINCIAL PARK

Official Journal of the European Union L 7/3

Open Report on behalf of Richard Wills Executive Director for Communities. Planning and Regulation Committee. County Matter Application - S38/0590/13

SPECTACLE LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK PURPOSE STATEMENT AND ZONING PLAN

Peace Region. MANAGEMENT Plan. January for Toad River Hot Springs Provincial Park. Ministry of Environment. Environmental Stewardship Division

Longmont to Boulder Regional Trail Jay Road Connection DRAFT FINAL REPORT

Bradley Brook Relocation Project. Scoping Notice. Saco Ranger District. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service

SUGARBOWL-GRIZZLY DEN PROVINCIAL PARK AND SUGARBOWL-GRIZZLY DEN PROTECTED AREA Purpose Statement and Zoning Plan

LEAFLET FEBRUARY. WWF-Greater Mekong DAWNA TENASSERIM LANDSCAPE. Wayuphong Jitvijak / WWF-Thailand

Decision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation

GUERNSEY ADVISORY CIRCULARS. (GACs) EXTENDED DIVERSION TIME OPERATIONS GAC 121/135-3

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

Jumbo Glacier Resort Master Plan. Appendix 3-K

Keeping Wilderness Wild: Increasing Effectiveness With Limited Resources

CITY OF LYNDEN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT MARCH 1, 2016

Defining housing markets using postcode sectors

Visitor Use Computer Simulation Modeling to Address Transportation Planning and User Capacity Management in Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park

TONGASS NATIONAL FOREST

Role of the Protected Area

SLIM CREEK PROVINCIAL PARK

Zambia. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

5.0 OUTDOOR RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES AND MANAGEMENT

GOLDEN BACKCOUNTRY RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (GBRAC)

Decision Memo Ice Age Trail Improvement (CRAC 37)

Section II. Planning & Public Process Planning for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail began in 2010 as a City of Minnetrista initiative.

Mackinnon Esker Ecological Reserve Draft - Management Plan

UC Berkeley Working Papers

The Nunavik Inuit Land Claims Agreement Impact Assessment Process. Presented at the Kuujjuaq Mining Forum, April 2017.

Tourism and Recreation Strategy for Protection Areas in Gitga at Territory Draft 2 for Discussion. Table of Contents

CONTACT: Investor Relations Corporate Communications

Final. Hydroacoustic and Airborne Monitoring at the Naval Station. Mayport Interim Report June 2015

Appendix N MAINTENANCE DREDGING STATEMENT OF NEED & PERMIT COMPLIANCE. North Thousand Islands Management Plan Appendices

Open Report on behalf of Richard Wills, Executive Director for Environment and Economy

Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action

Licence Application Decision ICB Simplified Process

Michipicoten Island Regional Plan

Kwadacha Wilderness Provincial Park and Kwadacha Addition (Kwadacha Recreation Area) Purpose Statement and Zoning Plan

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

Longlac North Conservation Reserve (C2207) Statement of Conservation Interest

Southwest Island Public Advisory Group (SIPAG) Meeting Minutes

The following criteria were used to identify Benchmark Areas:

MANAGEMENT DIRECTION STATEMENT March 2003

DECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction

2012 In-Market Research Report. Kootenay Rockies

Analysis of en-route vertical flight efficiency

Boyne Valley Provincial Park. Interim Management Statement

ONE ISLAND LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK Purpose Statement and Zoning Plan

Partnership for Quieter Skies Report

MANAGEMENT DIRECTION STATEMENT June, 1999

Recreational Carrying Capacity

Gold Coast: Modelled Future PIA Queensland Awards for Planning Excellence 2014 Nomination under Cutting Edge Research category

Fred Antoine Park. Management Plan. Final Public Review Draft

MANAGEMENT DIRECTION STATEMENT June, 1999

Cathay Pacific Airways Limited (293) - Financial and Strategic SWOT Analysis Review

Transcription:

Seral Stage and Patch Size Distribution Analyses for the North Coast Timber Supply Area March 3, 2008 Funded by: Investment Account (through Timber Ltd.) Project # 660900 Investment Schedule COTSA2669 Contract Admin #: 660900-2007-Patch/Seral Prepared by: Rick Brouwer, RPF Ltd. Limited 03 Kenney Street Terrace, BC Canada V8G 3E6 Tel: 0 638 0337 Fax: 0 638 0227 Web: www.nwtimber.ca

Acknowledgements Thanks to Shannon Pearce at Timber for her patience with this project. Wendy Rolston and Jim Knox of Magellan Digital Mapping were very adaptable as the dataset was developed, and were extremely easy to work with. Thanks also to representatives of local licencees for their interest in this project, for their co-operative and collaborative approach, and for providing block data, thereby making this project applicable and useable. ii

Executive Summary An analysis of the forest cover information was conducted to determine the seral and patch distributions for Landscape s within the North Coast Timber Supply Area. This analysis was carried out at two points in time: at the end of 2006, and then at the end of 20, after aging the forest cover and including projected harvesting. There are instances where seral stage imbalances exist on a proportional basis for licensees who have s that do not fully overlap with Landscape s. These cases should be reviewed to address the imbalances and ensure that they do not affect other licensees. Information is provided on mid-seral and old seral constraints for Site Series Surrogates as defined in the Central and North Coast Order. In addition, analyses to support the implementation of objectives for important fisheries watersheds and for upland streams are also provided, identifying areas that should be reviewed in more depth. One of 30 important fisheries watersheds is identified for further analysis. Eight of 700 upland watershed areas are identified as requiring further examination. Patch size distribution results for the North Coast TSA are provided. This information should limit conflicts between licencees when proceeding with block development, and will inform both licencee and Ministry of s and Range staff when considering the potential for cumulative impacts on the forest landbase. Information is also provided for the seral stage and patch size distribution results for licencee s within Landscape s, and tables are provided for licencees to review their specific situations. iii

(this page intentionally left blank) iv

Table of Contents Executive Summary... iii Introduction...7 2 Methodology...8 3 Results and Discussion...9 3. Seral Stage... 9 3.. Consolidated seral stage information (All Landscape s, all licensees)... 9 3..2 Seral Stage information for Licencee s that overlap with Landscape s... 57 3.2 Ecosystem-Based Management (Central and North Coast Order)... 58 3.2. Important Fisheries Watersheds... 58 3.2.2 Upland Streams... 6 3.2.3 Critical Grizzly Bear Habitat... 8 3.3 Patch Size... 8 3.3. Overall patch size distribution results (all Landscape s, all licensees)... 8 3.3.2 Consolidated patch size distribution information (all Landscape s, all licensees).. 85 3.3.3 Patch Size Distribution information for Licencee s that overlap with Landscape s... 85 4 Conclusions...86 Sources of Information:...87 Appendix A: Process algorithm for Seral stage and Patch size distribution analysis (North Coast District)...A Appendix B: Patch Size and Seral Stage Procedure...A9 Appendix C: Seral Stage Tables by Licencee...A3 Appendix E: Patch Size Distribution Tables by Licencee...A43 Appendix F: A guide for using the Seral Stage and Patch Size Distribution Analysie for the North Coast Timber Supply Area (March 2008)...A53 v

(this page intentionally left blank) vi

Introduction This project is a roll-up and update of information that was prepared in support of implementation of the Central and North Coast Order (CNCO), and for measurement of cumulative forest impacts within the North Coast District. The project involves updating the age, attribute, activity, and opening fields in a forest cover data set to make it current to December 3, 2006, and then carrying out patch and seral stage distribution analysis by landscape unit and forest development unit. This data is then trended forward for a five year period, and projected harvesting is added in. This analysis will allow licensees to evaluate their situation in achieving the targets for Landscape s (LU) in accordance with the CNCO. No licensee is obligated to roll this information up across the District this would be something that the Ministry of s and Range (MoFR) or the Integrated Land Management Bureau (ILMB) of the Ministry of Agriculture and Lands might do. The benefit of rolling the information up across the District is that all parties in the District end up with a similar data set and a reproducible process for ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the LU targets. This will also be of benefit to MoFR and ILMB for monitoring purposes. Seral stage data is separated into four age ranges: early, mid-seral, mature, and old. These seral stages have slightly different age parameters, depending on the biogeoclimatic variant and Natural Disturbance Type (NDT) that an area falls within. The target distribution amounts for the mid and old seral stages within each LU are based on the CNCO. Patch size distribution is evaluated against three patch size ranges: small (less than 40 ha), mid-sized (40 to 80 ha), and large (80-0 ha). Patches are groupings of similarly aged openings that are adjacent to another. Adjacent is defined as contiguous, or separated by less than 200 m of forest of a different seral stage, or by natural non-forested features less than 75 m wide. The targets for patch size distribution are the same for NDTs and 2 in the North Coast District. There is no NCT 3 or NDT 4 within the North Coast District. NDT 5 is alpine forest and will not be impacted by forest operations, so it is not included in this report. The data is also used to measure consistency with Objectives identified in the CNCO for Important Fisheries Watersheds and for Upland s. 7

2 Methodology In general, the steps required to carry out this project are Review and clean base data set Update data with information from licensees, ILMB, and MoFR to a common time frame Perform Seral stage analysis Perform Patch Size Distribution analysis Summarize results in tabular format The base data set used for this project is a combination of data for the North Coast District, starting with the Vegetation Resource Inventory data downloaded from the Land and Resource Data Warehouse, and augmented and updated with information from the timber supply review dataset prepared by the Defined Area Management group for the North Coast, as well as a further refinement of the same TSR dataset provided by the BC Ministry of s and Range. Review, cleaning, and updating of the data set was performed by Magellan Digital Mapping, and involved the acquisition of information from affected licensees and BC Timber Sales. This information included data on logging history, proposed harvest units for the period 2007 20 for all licensees, and (FDU) boundaries where they were available. FDU boundaries were provided by licensees: BC Timber Sales, Coast Tsimshian Resources Limited Partnership, Metlakatla Corporation, Sonora Logging Ltd, and Timber Ltd. Seral analyses included overlapping licensee FDU boundaries with Landscape s (LU), and determining the areas of mid and old seral stages in both BEC variants and Natural Disturbance Types that fall within the FDUs in a Landscape. The seral data was also used to compare watershed-level information with targets set out in the CNCO for Important Fisheries Watersheds and for Upland areas within :,000 forest atlas watersheds. Patch analyses included calculating the area of patches that fall within similar groupings, by both FDU and LU. Tables are produced to summarise the areas by both Landscape and by FDU for both the Seral and the Patch analyses. A detailed algorithm process is provided in Appendices A and B. 8

3 Results and Discussion The primary products from this project are tables that summarise the distribution of seral stages and patch sizes for Landscape s, and for watersheds identified in the Central and North Coast Order (CNCO). In addition, patch and seral information is provided regarding the portions of FDUs that fall with the LUs. This will allow licensees and the MoFR to monitor and evaluate whether CNCO targets are being achieved, or whether progress is being made towards achieving the targets. 3. Seral Stage The following tables provide information on the distribution of seral stages across landscape units. Landscape s are red-flagged as not achieving the seral stage targets. 3.. Consolidated seral stage information (All Landscape s, all licensees) The following tables provide data for three seral stage groupings (early, mature plus old, and old) by biogeoclimatic (BGC) variant within a Landscape. A variance is calculated between the targeted seral stage limit, and the actual seral stage distribution.a red flag is identified where the variance is within 00 ha of the target or the BGC variant and NDT type within a Landscape. When the target threshold has been exceeded (early) or is in deficit (mature + old, old), negative numbers are denoted (in red with parentheses). A blank cell means that there is no red flag for this BEC variant.this data is presented at two stages (end of 2006, and end of 20). To determine if the trend is in the right direction, specific red flag variants can be compared between 2006 and 20. When comparing the 2006 with the 20 data, there will be a few instances when a BEC variant is in one table and not the other. This is due to there being no area in that variant at that time. For example, if there were no early forests in an area in 2006, but there was logging projected for the period 2006-20, then the variant will show up in the 20 table. 9

Table : All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Table : All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Anyox - CWH wm - AU3 94.2 (44.2) (.3) Anyox - CWH wm - 5.6 44.4 230.5 Anyox - CWH wm - 0 (5) (9.4) Anyox - CWH wm - 62.6 (2.6) (53.7) Anyox - CWH wm - 2.9. 3.8 Anyox - MH mm - 48.4.6 0. Anyox - MH mm - 78.2 (.2) (479.7) Aristazabal - - 0.8 39.2 9.3 Aristazabal - - 0.6 49.4 95.9 Banks - - AU3 78.7 (.7) (3.0) Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU3 47.3 2.7 0.6 Belle Bay - CWH wm -.2 48.8 84.6 Belle Bay - CWH wm - 4.4 45.6 3703.0 Belle Bay - MH mm -.0 39.0 3.6 Belle Bay - MH wh - 0. 49.9 624.9 - CWH vm - 5. 34.9 57. - CWH vm - 3.5 46.5 30. - CWH vm - 6. 43.9 7.7 - - AU3 65.6 (5.6) (7.4) - - 0.5 49.5 9.2 - MH mm - 0. 49.9.4 - MH mm - 9. 40.9 997.0 - - AU3 0 (5) (.9) - - 5.8 44.2.7 - - 65.8 (5.8) (2.6) - - 53.5 (3.5) (5.4) - CWH vm - AU0 42.8 7.2 9.5 - CWH vm - AU3.7 (9.7) (2.7) - CWH vm - AU4.5 (9.5) (9.3) - CWH vm - 6.6 43.4 22.0 - CWH vm - 49.8 2235.9 - CWH vm - 9.5 40.5.3 - CWH vm - 6. 43.9 052.8 - CWH vm -. 48.9 37.7 - - AU4 2. 47.9 0.5 - - 9.3 40.7 8.3 - - 0. 49.9 2406.5 - - 7.4 42.6 476.5 - - 0.4 49.6 07.9 - MH mm - 5.2 44.8 338.9 - MH mm - 38.5.5 3.9 - MH mm - 0.9 49. 69.5 - - AU3 0 (5) (2.) - CWH vm - AU 5.0 45.0 30.8 - CWH vm - AU3 0 (5) (.4) - CWH vm - 5. 34.9 44.6 - CWH vm - 35.4 4.6 2.3 - CWH vm - 3.8 46.2 40 - CWH vm - 2.4 47.6 379.0 - - 0. 49.9 23.7 - MH mm -.4 48.6 233.0 - MH mm - 7.5 42.5 80. - MH wh - 0.4 49.6 38.8 - MH wh - 3.4 46.6 69.5 - - AU3 90. (40.) (2.3) - - 0.4 49.6 744. - MH wh - 5.0 45.0 524.6 - MH wh - 5.0 35.0 26. 0

Table : All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - CWH vm - 0.7 49.3 626.8 - - 0.8 49.2 202.9 - MH mm - 4.6 45.4 58 Chapple - - AU3 99.3 (49.3) (.3) Chapple - - 5 5807.8 Chapple - - 70.7 (20.7) (3.9) Chapple - - 4. 45.9 583.5 Chapple - MH wh -. 48.9 247.8 Chapple - MH wh - 5 4. Dundas - - AU2 0. 49.9 3573.8 Dundas - - 0 (5) (.6) Gil - - AU3 96. (46.) (43.9) Gil - - 2. 47.9 8.5 Gil - - 0. 49.9 676.2 Gil - MH wh - AU3 99.9 (49.9) () Gil - MH wh -.8 48.2 96.6 - - AU0 27.0 23.0 8.4 - - AU3 54.6 (4.6) (3.4) - - 0.5 49.5 36.0 - -.3 48.7 3788.5 - - 49.7 77.9 - - 5.4 44.6 809.5 - - 2.9 47. 883.8 - MH wh - 5.4 (.4) (0.) - MH wh - 2. 0 37.9 343.7 - MH wh - 0 (0) (3.9) - MH wh - 49.5 0.5 - MH wh - 9.9 40. 36.7 - - AU0 4.4 35.6 2.3 - - AU3 47.5 2.5.3 - - 3.9 46. 2 - - 0.5 49.5 2389.2 - - 65. (5.) (8.) - - 5.3 44.7 2.5 - -.2 48.8 4536.5 - MH wh - 0.6 49.4 7.3 - MH wh - 86.4 (36.4) (6.) - MH wh -.8 48.2 390.8 - - 2.3 47.7 34.8 - - 49.8 004.0 - - 0.7 49.3 579.0 - MH wh -.4 48.6 69.6 - MH wh -.5 48.5 546.5 Helmcken - - AU3 64.3 (4.3) (.7) Helmcken - - 0. 49.9 6030.8 Helmcken - - 2.6 47.4 209. Helmcken - MH wh - 2.8 47.2 437. - - AU3 48.6.4 0.7 - - 0. 49.9 372.7 - - 0. 49.9 300.5 - MH wh - 0.6 49.4 207.4 - MH wh - 3.7 46.3 8.9 Johnston - CWH vm - AU0 7.4 32.6 23. Johnston - CWH vm - AU.6 48.4 09.0 Johnston - CWH vm - AU3.4 (0.4) (.4) Johnston - CWH vm - 2.0 48.0 48.3 Johnston - CWH vm - 5.3 34.7 30.9 Johnston - CWH vm -. 48.9 076.9 Johnston - - AU3.4 20.6 8.9 Johnston - - 49.7 9.7

Table : All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Johnston - - 0.4 49.6 3024.7 Johnston - MH mm - 5.0 45.0 603.6 - - AU2 0.4 49.6 00.4 - - AU3 75.4 (.4) (35.3) - - 0. 49.9 0803.3 - - 6.2 33.8 89.4 - - 4.4 45.6 727.5 - MH wh - AU3 99.9 (49.9) () - MH wh - 4.4 45.6 78 - CWH vm - AU.5 48.5 39.3 - CWH vm - AU3 84.7 (34.7) (49.2) - CWH vm - 5.4 34.6 46.6 - CWH vm - 49.7 08 - - 0 (5) (.3) - MH mm - 4.2 45.8 820.9 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU0 2.3 47.7 6.9 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU3 63.2 (3.2) (.4) Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - 4.3 45.7 43.8 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - 49.8 65. Khutzeymateen Park - - 4.7 45.3 260.5 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU3 40. 9.9 3.5 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - 0.9 49. 958. Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - 2.3 0 47.7 843.2 Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - AU 0 (0) (2.9) Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - 5.6 44.4 30.9 Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - 0.4 39.6 978.6 - CWH vm - AU3.9 (0.9) (.9) - CWH vm - 0.8 49.2 482.0 - CWH vm - 39. 0.9 3. - CWH vm - 7.0 43.0 807. - CWH vm - 0. 49.9 362.5 - - AU3 0 (5) (3.2) - - 49.8 205.0 - MH mm - 8.7 4.3 04.8 Kitkiata - CWH vm - 5 6.5 Kitkiata - MH mm -.8 48.2 378.5 - CWH wm -.0 (8.0) (0.6) - CWH ws - AU3 2.7 6.7 - CWH ws - 8. 4.9 34.5 - CWH ws - 6.4 43.6 40.5 - CWH ws - 3.9 36. 547.3 - CWH ws 2 - AU3 0 (5) (0.7) - CWH ws 2-0.6 49.4 906. - CWH ws 2-0.5 49.5 3045.2 - MH mm 2-5.0 45.0 458.0 - MH mm 2 -.0 49.0 60.0 Klekane - CWH vm - AU3 0 (5) (.) Klekane - CWH vm - 0.6 49.4 56.2 Klekane - CWH vm -.3 24.7 2.6 Klekane - - 0.4 49.6 27.3 Klekane - - 3 9.7 24. Klekane - MH mm -.5 (9.5) (9.) Kshwan - CWH wm - AU3 20.4.6 72.4 Kshwan - CWH wm -.0 49.0 244.7 Kshwan - MH mm - 3.3 36.7.9 - - AU0 4.2 35.8 - - AU3 43.4 6.6 7.8 - - 49.7 26.6 - - 3.3 36.7.5 - -.9 48. 209.3 2

Table : All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - 0.8 49.2 2638.3 - MH mm - 49.7.2 - MH wh - 49.7 358.5 - CWH vm - AU3 2.7.3 26.2 - CWH vm - 5 20.7 - -.6 48.4 9.0 - MH mm -.5 38.5 264.7 Laredo - - AU3 57. (7.) (.4) Laredo - -.3 38.7 75.4 Laredo - - 5 6966.6 Laredo - - 49.8 4.0 Laredo - - 0.6 49.4 657.4 Laredo - MH wh - 3.5 46.5 393.2 Laredo - MH wh - 9.5 30.5 7.4 Laredo - MH wh - 5 5.5 Marmot - CWH wm - AU3 53.7 (3.7) (2.7) Marmot - CWH wm - 2.7 37.3 72.9 Marmot - CWH wm - 49.7 7.2 Marmot - MH mm -.0 49.0 273. Marmot - MH mm - 2.9 47. 2.6 McCauley - - AU3 0 (5) (2.2) Monckton - - AU3.9 (8.9) (8.4) Monckton - - 49.8 5.5 Monckton - MH wh - 2.7 47.3 42.3 Observatory East - CWH wm - 49.8 3240.5 Observatory East - MH mm - 3.3 46.7 4.8 Observatory West - - AU3 20.9. 7.3 Observatory West - - 49.7 4.6 Observatory West - CWH wm - AU2 0 (5) (3.6) Observatory West - CWH wm - AU3 23.5 26.5 2.8 Observatory West - CWH wm -.6 24.4 5.6 Observatory West - CWH wm - 45.9 4. 5.8 Observatory West - CWH wm - 26.6 23.4 24.9 Observatory West - MH mm - 98.8 (48.8) (5.4) Observatory West - MH mm - 26.6 23.4 233.4 Observatory West - MH wh -.3 38.7.2 Olh - CWH wm - AU3 27.6 22.4 Olh - CWH wm - 23.0 27.0 90.7 Olh - CWH wm - 4.3 45.7 32.7 Olh - CWH wm - 23.0 27.0 477.9 Olh - CWH wm - 24.5.5 469.8 Olh - MH mm - AU2 0 (5) (5.) Olh - MH mm - 26.3 23.7 3.6 Olh - MH mm - 60.5 (0.5) (200.6) - - AU3 3.7 36.3 8.7 - - 5 443.7 - MH wh - 0.6 49.4 33.2 - MH wh - 2.4 47.6 209.5 Pearse - - AU3.8 (8.8) (2.) Pearse - - 2. 37.9 49.6 - - AU3 4. 35.9 46.7 - -.7 48.3 63.9 - - 5 2024 - - 36.9 3. 8.7 - - 4.7 45.3.6 - - 49.8 39. - MH wh - 49.8 452. - MH wh - 4.8 45.2.8 - MH wh -.7 48.3 32.3 - - AU3 90. (40.) (33.9) 3

Table : All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - 5 8.0 - - 9.4 40.6 433.9 - -.2 48.8 653.0 - CWH vm - AU 30.8 9.2 26.9 - CWH vm - AU2.6 48.4 44.8 - CWH vm - AU3 33. 6.9 9.2 - CWH vm - 0.7 49.3 547.5 - CWH vm -.2 48.8 420.5 - CWH vm - 49.7 426.0 - - AU3 65.8 (5.8) (0.4) - - 3.6 8.4.5 - - 0.8 49.2 327.3 - - 4.0 46.0 78.6 - MH mm -.2 48.8 6.0 - MH mm -.2 48.8 02.0 - MH mm - 7.2 42.8 0.7 - MH wh - 6. 33.9 238.5 - - AU3 77.4 (27.4) (26.3) - - 2.4 47.6 99.9 - - 7.4 42.6 55.5 - - 2.9 47. 483.7 - -. 48.9 3005.6 - MH wh - 3.8 46.2 2.7 - MH wh - 5.3 44.7 265.3 - CWH vm - AU3 49. 0.9 0.5 - CWH vm -. 48.9 245.6 - CWH vm -.5 48.5 647.3 - CWH vm - 0.7 49.3 6. - - AU3 0 (5) (0.4) - - 0.4 49.6 87.6 - - 0. 49.9 2432.6 - MH mm - 2.6 47.4.2 - MH mm - 5.6 0 44.4 445.7 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU0 9.4 30.6 7.5 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU.4 (0.4) (0.4) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU3.4 24.6 367.0 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - 4.4 45.6 335.8 Skeena Islands - MH mm - 3.0 47.0 67.9 - CWH vm - AU0 5.9 34. 36.6 - CWH vm - AU 3.2 8.8 3. - CWH vm - AU3 87.7 (37.7) (39.9) - CWH vm - 7.0 (2.0) (27.7) - CWH vm -. 38.9 79.2 - CWH vm - 0.4 49.6 894.9 - - AU0 9.8 3 7.8 - - AU3 6.0 34.0 - - 79. (.) (9.4) - - 49.8 736.6 - -.6 0 48.4 302 - MH mm - AU0 06.9 0 (06.9) () - MH mm - AU 0 (0) (2.0) - MH mm - AU2 7.2 42.8 4.4 - MH mm -.2 48.8 83.2 - MH mm - 0 (5) (0.4) - MH mm - 9.4 40.6 23. - MH mm - 6.0 44.0 626.5 - MH wh - 72.3 (22.3) (7.0) - MH wh - 2.6 47.4 207. Sparkling - CWH vm - AU2.0 49.0. Sparkling - CWH vm - AU3 67.6 (7.6) (32.9) 4

Table : All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Sparkling - CWH vm - 5.9 44. 87.6 Sparkling - CWH vm -.3 48.7 344.9 Sparkling - CWH vm -.3 48.7 547.8 Sparkling - MH mm -.0 49.0 5 Sparkling - MH mm - 6.3 43.7 782.7 Stagoo - CWH wm - AU3 20.7.3 4. Stagoo - CWH wm - 0.7 49.3 7.6 Stagoo - CWH wm - 49.8 375. Stagoo - CWH ws - AU3 0 (5) () Stagoo - MH mm - AU2.5 48.5. Stagoo - MH mm - 0.8 49.2 9.3 Stagoo - MH mm - 3.9 46. 44.7 Stagoo - MH mm - 7.2 42.8 822.7 - - AU0 74.0 (24.0) (4.3) - - AU3 96.2 (46.2) (72.7) - - 49.8 855. - - 2. 47.9 7 - - 3.5 46.5 438.0 - CWH vm - AU3 0 (5) (9.8) - CWH vm - 2.6 47.4 6. - CWH vm - 2.3 47.7 442.8 - CWH vm -.3 48.7 3.7 - CWH vm - 5.7 44.3 5.7 - - 9.6 30.4 4.0 - - 7. 42.9 5.0 - - 5.3 34.7 67.4 - MH mm - 8.2 3.8 5 - MH mm -.7 (8.7) (.8) - MH mm - 0.4 39.6 36.2 - MH wh - AU3 0 (5) (.9) - MH wh - 0.5 49.5 67.2 - MH wh - 5.4 44.6 0.8 - MH wh - 8.2 4.8 465.5 Tolmie - - AU4 0 (5) (2.4) - CWH vm - AU3 55. (5.) (3.5) - CWH vm - AU4 0 (5) (6.2) - CWH vm - 4.7 35.3 57.5 - CWH vm - 0.9 49. 839.5 - CWH vm - 38.4.6 30.7 - CWH vm - 8.3 4.7 982.0 - CWH vm - 2. 47.9 333.4 - - AU3 34.3 5.7 - - 2.7 58.8 - - 4.8 45.2 84. - - 6.2 43.8 5.7 - - 9.0 4.0 2.3 - - 3.7 46.3 555.3 - MH mm - 0 (5) (.0) - MH mm - 8.5 4.5 7.0 - MH mm - 99.6 (49.6) () - MH mm - 56.6 (6.6) (6.0) - MH mm - 8.4 4.6 00.8 - - AU2 0. 49.9 440.5 - - AU3 49.6 0.4 0.8 - - 49.7 7848.0 - - 0. 49.9 606.4 - - 0.5 49.5 23.5 - MH wh - AU3 99.9 (49.9) () - MH wh - 5 480.6 - MH wh - 4.0 46.0 604.4 5

Table : All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU3 32.9 7. 5.3 - -.2 48.8 445.5 - -.0 49.0 922.3 - CWH vm - AU3 45.4 4.6.4 - CWH vm - 0. 49.9 339.7 - - AU 6.3 33.7 2.6 - - AU2 4. 45.9 55.3 - - 0 (5) () - - 3.2 46.8 863.6 - MH mm - 0 (5) (3.5) - MH mm - 4.4 - MH wh - AU2 6.8 (.8) (.) - MH wh - 2.3 47.7 300.9 - MH wh - 6. 43.9 588. - - AU3 86.6 (36.6) (37.2) - - 0.4 49.6 387.0 - - 0 (5) (4.0) - -.3 48.7 38. - - 0.7 49.3 364.4 - CWH vm - AU0 58.3 (8.3) (8.0) - CWH vm - AU3 92.9 (42.9) (86.6) - CWH vm - AU4 0 (5) (5.3) - CWH vm - 0.8 49.2 833.2 - CWH vm - 7.9 42. 264. - CWH vm - 0.5 49.5 9.4 - CWH vm - 2. 47.9 944.8 - - AU3 0 (5) (23.9) - - 0.6 49.4 395.4 - - 4.0 46.0 49. - MH mm - AU3 0 (5) (4.6) - MH mm - 3.0 47.0 642.3 - MH mm - 5.9 44. 52.3 - MH wh - 6.2 43.8 08.2 - MH wh - 6.3 43.7 58.9 6

Table 2: All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Table 2: All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Anyox - CWH wm - AU3 94.2 (44.2) (.3) Anyox - CWH wm - 5.6 44.4 230.5 Anyox - CWH wm - 55.0 (5.0) (6.) Anyox - CWH wm - 6.5 33.5 26 Anyox - MH mm - 48.4.6 0. Anyox - MH mm - 78.2 (.2) (479.7) Aristazabal - - 0.8 39.2 9.3 Aristazabal - - 2.5 47.5 92. Banks - - AU3 78.4 (.4) (3.0) Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU3 0 (5) (0.7) Belle Bay - CWH wm -.2 48.8 84.6 Belle Bay - CWH wm - 4.4 45.6 3703.0 Belle Bay - MH mm -.0 39.0 3.6 Belle Bay - MH wh - 0. 49.9 624.9 - CWH vm - AU3 54.7 (4.7) (0.) - CWH vm - AU4 85.4 (35.4) (4.8) - CWH vm - 5. 34.9 57. - CWH vm - 3.5 46.5 30. - CWH vm - 7.3 42.7 708.2 - CWH vm - 2.5 47.5 524.2 - - AU3 65.6 (5.6) (7.4) - - 0.5 49.5 9.2 - MH mm - 0. 49.9.4 - MH mm - 9. 40.9 997.0 - - AU3 0 (5) (.9) - - 5.8 44.2.7 - - 65.8 (5.8) (2.6) - - 53.5 (3.5) (5.4) - CWH vm - AU0.4 2.6.5 - CWH vm - AU3.5 (9.5) (2.6) - CWH vm - AU4 45.2 4.8 4.7 - CWH vm - 0.4 49.6 2.7 - CWH vm - 49.8 2235.9 - CWH vm - 5. 44.9 323.4 - CWH vm - 6.2 43.8 05 - CWH vm - 5. 44.9 34.6 - - 8.8 4.2 8.5 - - 0.8 49.2 2374.8 - - 7.4 42.6 476.5 - - 0.8 49.2 063.4 - MH mm - 6.8 43.2 326.3 - MH mm - 38.5.5 3.9 - MH mm -.8 48.2 66.6 - - AU3 0 (5) (2.) - - 22.3 27.7 5.5 - CWH vm - AU 5.0 45.0 30.8 - CWH vm - AU3 0 (5) (.4) - CWH vm - 5. 34.9 44.6 - CWH vm - 35.4 4.6 2.3 - CWH vm - 7.3 42.7 369.7 - CWH vm - 2.4 47.6 379.0 - - 0. 49.9 23.7 - MH mm -.4 48.6 233.0 - MH mm - 7.5 42.5 80. - MH wh - 0.4 49.6 38.8 - MH wh - 3.4 46.6 69.5 - - AU3 89.6 (39.6) (2.2) - - 0.4 49.6 744. 7

Table 2: All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - MH wh - 5.0 45.0 524.6 - MH wh - 5.0 35.0 26. - CWH vm - 0.7 49.3 626.8 - - 0.7 49.3 20.6 - MH mm - 4.6 45.4 58 Chapple - - AU3 47.9 2.. Chapple - - 70.7 (20.7) (3.9) Chapple - - 4. 45.9 583.5 Chapple - MH wh -. 48.9 247.8 Chapple - MH wh - 5 4. Dundas - - AU2 0. 49.9 3573.8 Dundas - - 0 (5) (.6) Gil - - AU3 82.6 (32.6) (3.0) Gil - - 2. 47.9 8.5 Gil - - 0. 49.9 677.6 Gil - MH wh - AU3 99.9 (49.9) () Gil - MH wh -.8 48.2 96.6 - - AU0 27.0 23.0 8.4 - - AU3 54.6 (4.6) (3.4) - - 0.5 49.5 36.0 - -.4 48.6 3777.5 - - 49.7 77.9 - - 5.8 44.2 8 - - 2.9 47. 883.8 - MH wh - 5.4 (.4) (0.) - MH wh - 4.0 0 36.0 326.7 - MH wh - 0 (0) (3.9) - MH wh - 49.5 0.5 - MH wh - 9.9 40. 36.7 - - AU0 4.4 35.6 2.3 - - AU3 47.5 2.5.3 - - 3. 46.9 23.7 - - 0.6 49.4 2343.4 - - 65. (5.) (8.) - - 6.5 43.5 462. - - 2.0 48.0 4464. - MH wh -.0 49.0 4.7 - MH wh - 86.9 (36.9) (6.2) - MH wh - 3.4 46.6 377.3 - - 2.3 47.7 34.8 - - 0.8 49.2 992.4 - - 0.7 49.3 579.0 - MH wh -.4 48.6 69.6 - MH wh - 37.9 2. 4. - MH wh -.5 48.5 546.5 Helmcken - - AU3 64.3 (4.3) (.7) Helmcken - - 0. 49.9 6030.8 Helmcken - - 2.6 47.4 209. Helmcken - MH wh - 2.8 47.2 437. - - AU3 48.6.4 0.7 - - 0. 49.9 372.7 - - 0. 49.9 300.5 - MH wh - 0.6 49.4 207.4 - MH wh - 3.7 46.3 8.9 Johnston - CWH vm - AU0 7.4 32.6 23. Johnston - CWH vm - AU.6 48.4 09.0 Johnston - CWH vm - AU3 49.0.0 3.6 Johnston - CWH vm - 2.0 48.0 48.3 Johnston - CWH vm - 42.6 7.4 6.6 Johnston - CWH vm -. 48.9 076.9 8

Table 2: All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Johnston - - AU3.4 20.6 8.9 Johnston - - 49.7 9.7 Johnston - - 0.4 49.6 3024.7 Johnston - MH mm - 5.0 45.0 603.6 - - AU2.6 48.4 977.6 - - AU3 82.2 (32.2) (7.8) - - 0. 49.9 0803.3 - - 2.7.3 - - 5.4 44.6 69.2 - MH wh - AU3 99.9 (49.9) () - MH wh - 4.4 45.6 78 - CWH vm - AU.5 48.5 39.3 - CWH vm - AU3 87.6 (37.6) (6.9) - CWH vm - 5.4 34.6 46.6 - CWH vm - 49.7 08 - - 0 (5) (.3) - MH mm - 4.2 45.8 820.9 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU0 2.3 47.7 6.9 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU3 88.0 (38.0) (32.7) Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - 4.3 45.7 43.8 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - 49.8 65. Khutzeymateen Park - - 4.7 45.3 260.5 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU 0.9 49. 69.4 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU3 67.3 (7.3) (23.7) Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - 0.9 49. 958. Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - 2.3 0 47.7 843.2 Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - AU 0 (0) (2.9) Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - 5.6 44.4 30.9 Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - 0.4 39.6 978.6 - CWH vm - AU3 60.4 (0.4) (22.8) - CWH vm -. 48.9 478.9 - CWH vm - 39. 0.9 3. - CWH vm - 8.2 4.8 784.7 - CWH vm - 0. 49.9 362.5 - - AU3 0 (5) (3.2) - - 36.5 3.5.9 - - 49.8 205.0 - MH mm - 0 (5) (2.3) - MH mm - 8.7 4.3 04.8 Kitkiata - CWH vm - 5 6.5 Kitkiata - MH mm -.8 48.2 378.5 - CWH wm -.0 (8.0) (0.6) - CWH ws - AU3 8.4 3.6 24.0 - CWH ws - 8. 4.9 34.5 - CWH ws - 6.4 43.6 40.5 - CWH ws - 3.9 36. 547.3 - CWH ws 2 - AU3 0 (5) (0.7) - CWH ws 2-0.6 49.4 906. - CWH ws 2-0.5 49.5 3045.2 - MH mm 2 - AU2 9.2 40.8 6.3 - MH mm 2-5.0 45.0 458.0 - MH mm 2 -.0 49.0 60.0 Klekane - CWH vm - 0.6 49.4 56.2 Klekane - CWH vm -.3 24.7 2.6 Klekane - - 0.4 49.6 27.3 Klekane - - 3 9.7 24. Klekane - MH mm -.5 (9.5) (9.) Kshwan - CWH wm - AU3 20.4.6 72.4 Kshwan - CWH wm -.0 49.0 244.7 Kshwan - MH mm - 3.3 36.7.9 9

Table 2: All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU0 4.2 35.8 - - AU3 43.4 6.6 7.8 - - 49.7 26.6 - - 3.3 36.7.5 - - 3.0 47.0 2042.2 - -.5 48.5 2605. - MH mm - 49.7.2 - MH wh - 49.7 358.5 - CWH vm - AU3 44.6 5.4 5.0 - CWH vm - 5 20.7 - -.6 48.4 9.0 - MH mm -.5 38.5 264.7 Laredo - - AU3 64.6 (4.6) (2.9) Laredo - -.3 38.7 75.4 Laredo - - 5 6966.6 Laredo - - 49.8 4.0 Laredo - - 0.6 49.4 657.4 Laredo - MH wh - 3.5 46.5 393.2 Laredo - MH wh - 9.5 30.5 7.4 Laredo - MH wh - 5 5.5 Marmot - CWH wm - AU3 53.7 (3.7) (2.7) Marmot - CWH wm - 2.7 37.3 72.9 Marmot - CWH wm - 49.7 7.2 Marmot - MH mm -.0 49.0 273. Marmot - MH mm - 2.9 47. 2.6 McCauley - - AU3 0 (5) (2.2) McCauley - - 5 3924.6 Monckton - - AU3 75.4 (.4) (.2) Monckton - - 49.8 5.5 Monckton - MH wh - 2.7 47.3 42.3 Observatory East - CWH wm - 49.8 3240.5 Observatory East - MH mm - 3.3 46.7 4.8 Observatory West - - AU3 20.9. 7.3 Observatory West - - 49.7 4.6 Observatory West - CWH wm - AU2 0 (5) (3.6) Observatory West - CWH wm - AU3 23.5 26.5 2.8 Observatory West - CWH wm -.6 24.4 5.6 Observatory West - CWH wm - 45.9 4. 5.8 Observatory West - CWH wm - 26.6 23.4 24.9 Observatory West - MH mm - 98.8 (48.8) (5.4) Observatory West - MH mm - 26.6 23.4 233.4 Observatory West - MH wh -.3 38.7.2 Olh - CWH wm - AU3 27.6 22.4 Olh - CWH wm - 23.0 27.0 90.7 Olh - CWH wm - 4.3 45.7 32.7 Olh - CWH wm - 23.0 27.0 477.9 Olh - CWH wm - 24.2.8 487.3 Olh - MH mm - AU2 0 (5) (5.) Olh - MH mm - 26.3 23.7 3.6 Olh - MH mm - 60.5 (0.5) (200.6) - - AU3 3.7 36.3 8.7 - - 5 443.7 - MH wh - 0.6 49.4 33.2 - MH wh - 2.4 47.6 209.5 Pearse - - AU3.8 (8.8) (2.) Pearse - - 2. 37.9 49.6 - - AU3 33.3 6.7 2.7 - -.7 48.3 63.9 - - 5 20234.0 - - 45.6 4.4 6.2 20

Table 2: All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - -.3 2.7 63.3 - - 0.4 49.6 394.5 - MH wh - 49.8 452. - MH wh - 9.2 30.8 7.6 - MH wh -.7 48.3 32.3 - - AU3 90. (40.) (33.9) - - 5 8.0 - - 2.5 37.5 40 - -.2 48.8 653.0 - CWH vm - AU 55.5 (5.5) (7.7) - CWH vm - AU2.6 48.4 44.8 - CWH vm - AU3 49.8 - CWH vm - 0.7 49.3 547.5 - CWH vm - 9. 40.9 35.7 - CWH vm - 49.7 426.0 - - AU3 65.8 (5.8) (0.4) - - AU4 0 (5) (.0) - - 3.6 8.4.5 - - 0.8 49.2 326.8 - - 4.0 46.0 78.6 - MH mm - AU4 0 (5) (7.4) - MH mm -.2 48.8 6.0 - MH mm -.2 48.8 02.0 - MH mm - 7.2 42.8 0.7 - MH wh - 6. 33.9 238.5 - - AU3 77.4 (27.4) (26.3) - - 2.4 47.6 99.9 - - 7.4 42.6 55.5 - - 2.9 47. 483.7 - -. 48.9 3005.6 - MH wh - 3.8 46.2 2.7 - MH wh - 5.3 44.7 265.3 - CWH vm - AU3 49. 0.9 0.5 - CWH vm -. 48.9 245.6 - CWH vm - 5.2 44.8.2 - CWH vm - 0.7 49.3 6. - - AU3 0 (5) (0.4) - - 0.4 49.6 87.6 - - 0. 49.9 2432.6 - MH mm - 2.6 47.4.2 - MH mm - 5.6 0 44.4 445.7 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU0 9.4 30.6 7.5 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU.4 (0.4) (0.4) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU3 34.9 5. 2.7 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - 4.4 45.6 335.8 Skeena Islands - MH mm - 3.0 47.0 67.9 - CWH vm - AU0 35.5 4.5 5.6 - CWH vm - AU 3.5 8.5 30.7 - CWH vm - AU3 87.7 (37.7) (39.9) - CWH vm - 7.0 (2.0) (27.7) - CWH vm -.7 38.3 69.6 - CWH vm - 0.4 49.6 894.9 - - AU0 9.8 3 7.8 - - AU3 6.0 34.0 - - 79. (.) (9.4) - - 4.3 45.7 6 - -.6 0 48.4 302 - MH mm - AU0 06.9 0 (06.9) () - MH mm - AU 0 (0) (2.0) - MH mm - AU2 7.2 42.8 4.4 2

Table 2: All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - MH mm -.2 48.8 83.2 - MH mm - 0 (5) (0.4) - MH mm - 22.9 27. 5.4 - MH mm - 6.0 44.0 626.5 - MH wh - 72.3 (22.3) (7.0) - MH wh - 2.6 47.4 207. Sparkling - CWH vm - AU2.0 49.0. Sparkling - CWH vm - AU3 98.2 (48.2) (89.8) Sparkling - CWH vm - 5.9 44. 87.6 Sparkling - CWH vm -.3 48.7 344.9 Sparkling - CWH vm -.3 48.7 547.8 Sparkling - MH mm -.0 49.0 5 Sparkling - MH mm - 6.3 43.7 782.7 Stagoo - CWH wm - AU3 20.7.3 4. Stagoo - CWH wm - 0.5 49.5 766.0 Stagoo - CWH wm - 49.8 375. Stagoo - CWH ws - AU3 0 (5) () Stagoo - MH mm - AU2.5 48.5. Stagoo - MH mm - 0.8 49.2 9.3 Stagoo - MH mm - 3.9 46. 44.7 Stagoo - MH mm - 7.2 42.8 822.7 - - AU3 43.2 6.8 0.7 - - 49.8 866.6 - - 0.8 49.2 75.5 - - 2.2 47.8 479.4 - CWH vm - AU3 8 (3) (5.9) - CWH vm - 2.6 47.4 6. - CWH vm - 2.3 47.7 442.8 - CWH vm - 49.8 333.2 - CWH vm - 5 30.5 - - 9.6 30.4 4.0 - - 7. 42.9 5.0 - - 3.9 46. 89.6 - MH mm - 8.2 3.8 5 - MH mm -.7 (8.7) (.8) - MH mm - 0.4 39.6 36.2 - MH wh - AU3 0 (5) (.9) - MH wh - 0.5 49.5 67.2 - MH wh - 5.4 44.6 0.8 - MH wh - 8.2 4.8 465.5 Tolmie - - AU4 0 (5) (2.4) - CWH vm - AU3 55. (5.) (3.5) - CWH vm - AU4 0 (5) (6.2) - CWH vm - 4.7 35.3 57.5 - CWH vm - 0.9 49. 839.3 - CWH vm - 38.4.6 30.7 - CWH vm - 8.3 4.7 983.0 - CWH vm - 2.4 47.6 33. - - AU3 34.3 5.7 - - 2.7 58.8 - - 8. 4.9 755.0 - - 6.2 43.8 5.7 - -.4 38.6 472.8 - - 4. 45.9 549.6 - MH mm - 0 (5) (.0) - MH mm - 2.3 37.7 233.0 - MH mm - 99.6 (49.6) () - MH mm - 57.4 (7.4) (6.7) - MH mm - 8.4 4.6 00.8 - - AU2 0. 49.9 440.5 22

Table 2: All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU3 49.6 0.4 0.8 - - 49.7 7848.0 - - 0.6 49.4.6 - - 0.5 49.5 2369. - MH wh - AU3 99.9 (49.9) () - MH wh - 5 480.6 - MH wh - 4.0 46.0 604.5 - - AU 30.5 9.5 3. - - AU3 32.9 7. 5.3 - - 4.6 45.4 45. - - 2.4 47.6 895.0 - CWH vm - AU3 7.7 (2.7) (6.5) - CWH vm - 4.3 45.7 3. - - AU 6.3 33.7 2.6 - - AU2 4. 45.9 55.3 - - 0 (5) () - - 3.2 46.8 863.6 - MH mm - 0 (5) (3.5) - MH mm - 4.4 - MH wh - AU2 6.8 (.8) (.) - MH wh - 2.3 47.7 300.9 - MH wh - 6. 43.9 588. - - AU3 5.6 (.6) (.7) - - 49.8 39.4 - - 0 (5) (4.0) - -.3 48.7 38. - - 0.7 49.3 364.4 - CWH vm - AU0 58.3 (8.3) (8.0) - CWH vm - AU3 7 (2) (40.4) - CWH vm - AU4 0 (5) (5.3) - CWH vm - 0.5 49.5 845.6 - CWH vm - 6.4 33.6 20.8 - CWH vm -.2 48.8 902.6 - CWH vm - 4.3 45.7 90 - - AU3 99.5 (49.5) (23.7) - - 0.5 49.5 399. - - 3.4 46.6 66.0 - MH mm - AU3 0 (5) (4.6) - MH mm - 3.0 47.0 642.3 - MH mm - 5.9 44. 52.3 - MH wh - 6.2 43.8 08.2 - MH wh - 6.3 43.7 58.9 23

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Anyox - CWH wm - AU3 0 Anyox - CWH wm - (.0) (304.5) Anyox - MH mm - (.0) () Anyox - CWH wm - 2.9 (22.) () Anyox - MH mm - 8.6 (6.4) (08.6) Anyox - MH mm - 5.6 23.6.8 Anyox - CWH wm - (.0) (.) Anyox - CWH wm - 2.5 65 (52.5) (272.2) Anyox - CWH wm - AU2 (.0) (.5) Aristazabal - - AU2.8 (27.2) (42.5) Aristazabal - - 24.0 (5.0) (793.0) Aristazabal - - 82.3 53.3 03.4 Aristazabal - - 84.6 55.6 27.3 Aristazabal - - 94.5 65.5 4 Aristazabal - - AU0 (.0) (2.9) Banks - - AU3 0 Banks - - (.0) (3.6) Banks - - AU2 30.7.7 238.6 Banks - - 60.6 3.6 273.5 Banks - - 69.3 4 249.5 Banks - - 73. 44. 2088.3 Banks - - 95.3 66.3 37.6 Banks - MH wh - 96.5 67.5 2.8 Banks - MH wh - 0 7.0 6.0 Banks - MH wh - AU2 0. Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU3 0 Belle Bay - MH mm - 75.5.5 748.5 Belle Bay - CWH wm - 77.7 52.7 909.4 Belle Bay - CWH wm - 85.8 60.8 493.3 Belle Bay - MH mm - 99.4 74.4 36.8 Belle Bay - - 0 0.9 Belle Bay - - 99. 70. 364.0 Belle Bay - MH wh - 99.4 70.4 880.6 Belle Bay - - 99.8 70.8 222.4 Belle Bay - MH wh - 0 7.0 3.6 Belle Bay - - 0 7.0 370.9 Belle Bay - - AU2 0 7.0 0.6 Belle Bay - CWH wm - 54.4 (4.6) (.8) Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU 69.6 0.6 3.3 Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU0 0 4.0 0.9 Belle Bay - CWH wm - 49.6 65 (5.4) (5.6) Belle Bay - CWH wm - 86.2 65 2.2 240. Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU2 7.4 3.4 2.4 Belle Bay - MH wh - 0 7.5 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (3.4) - CWH vm - AU0.4 (23.6) (79.6) - - 4.5 (20.5) (7.7) - CWH vm - 2.5 (2.5) (83.6) - CWH vm - AU 7.5 (7.5) (20.8) - CWH vm - 49.4 24.4 269.2 - CWH vm - 5.0 44.6 - MH mm - 56.7 3.7 773.0 - - 62.2 37.2 447.8 - - 82.4 57.4 977.6 - MH mm - 98.6 73.6 0. - - AU2 2.3 (5.7) (9.6) 24

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - 26.2 (.8) (0.8) - CWH vm - AU2.7 40.7 6.7 - CWH vm - 74.3 46.3 75.8 - - 76.4 48.4 53.5 - CWH vm - 76.5 48.5 554.3 - MH mm - 88.4 60.4 2.5 - - AU4 (.0) (.6) - - AU0 52.3 (6.7) (3.3) - - AU 94.0 35.0 4. - MH mm - AU2 6.3 65 (3.7) () - - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (24.5) - - (.0) (4.) - - (.0) (0.6) - CWH vm -.6 (23.4) (.7) - CWH vm - AU 8.0 (7.0) (24.) - CWH vm - AU0 23.5 (.5) (.9) - MH mm - 30.8 5.8 2.0 - CWH vm - 58.7 33.7 808. - - 7.7 46.7 522.7 - CWH vm - 76.0 5.0 387.6 - MH mm - 87.3 62.3 25. - - 88.5 63.5 37.8 - CWH vm - AU2 2.8 (5.2) (.0) - - 4 2.2 5.5 - MH mm - 63.6 35.6 269.2 - CWH vm - 75. 47. 239.6 - - 78.3 5 24.4 - CWH vm - 85.0 57.0.4 - - AU2 0 2.7 - - AU2 (.0) (5.3) - - 4.8 2.8 56.4 - - 55.2 26.2 7.0 - MH wh - 96.4 67.4 4.3 - - 96.5 67.5 40.5 - - 99.6 70.6 7.3 - MH wh - 0 7.0 38.8 - - AU (.0) (42.) - - AU (.0) (3.) - - AU4 (.0) (0.6) - MH wh - 0 9.3 - - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (0.6) - CWH vm - (.0) (2.) - - (.0) (.) - CWH vm - 70.9 45.9 365. - CWH vm - 76. 5. 442.9 - - 79.0 54.0 333.7 - CWH vm - AU 80.4 55.4 37.9 - MH mm - 8.5 56.5 066.2 - - 88.6 63.6 340. - CWH vm - AU0 95.5 70.5 22.5 - MH mm - 98.2 73.2. - - 32.4 4.4 0.9 - CWH vm -.6 22.6.8 - CWH vm - AU2 73.5 45.5 4.4 - CWH vm - 80.5 52.5 226.5 - - AU2 8.2 53.2 3.7

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - MH mm - 88.5 60.5 0. - - 93. 65. 545.7 - MH wh - (.0) (22.7) - - 6.2 (2.8) (2.5) - MH wh - 65. 36. 53.9 - MH wh - 70.6 4.6 32.6 - - 94.4 65.4 3.5 - - 95.8 66.8 99.9 - - AU2 0 7.0 5.2 - - AU (.0) (3.6) - - AU0 0 4.0 0.4 - - AU 0 4.0.6 - MH mm - AU2 64.5 65 (0.5) () - MH wh - 0 3.9 Butedale - - (.0) () Butedale - MH mm - (.0) () Butedale - - (.0) (0.) Butedale - MH mm - (.0) (0.6) Butedale - CWH vm - 2.8 (.2) () Butedale - - (.0) () Butedale - MH wh - (.0) (0.5) Campania - MH wh - (.0) (0.8) Campania - MH wh - (.0) (3.2) Campania - - AU2 0.6 (.4) (3000.5) Campania - -.7 (3.3) (53.5) Campania - - 48.4 9.4 7.8 Campania - - 52.7 23.7 7.6 Campania - MH wh - AU2 (.0) (43.6) - - AU3 0 - MH wh - 8.6 (0.4) (2.) - - 4.0 2.0 469.8 - MH wh - 46.2 7.2 6.8 - - 54.0.0 879.6 - - AU2 66.2 37.2 37. - - 88.0.0 639.3 - - 0 7.0 423.0 - - AU0 0 4.0.5 - MH wh - 0 2.0 - MH wh - 0 8.0 - MH mm - AU 0 - - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - - (.0) () - - (.0) (2.5) - CWH vm - 20. (4.9) (5.2) - CWH vm - AU0 63.2 38.2 26.2 - CWH vm - 79.2 54.2 9.0 - CWH vm - AU 82.6 57.6 69.7 - MH mm - 86.0 6.0 22 - CWH vm - 86.0 6.0 766.9 - - 89. 64. 263.0 - - 92.0 67.0 483.6 - MH mm - 98. 73. 46.8 - - AU2 42. 4. 5. - MH mm -.4 22.4.9 - -.0 3.0 34.6 - CWH vm - 69.3 4.3 6.7 - CWH vm - AU2 76.7 48.7 6.8 - CWH vm - 82.0 54.0 45 - MH wh - 0.5 (8.5) (52.0) 26

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU2 49.5 20.5 8. - - 60.6 3.6 5.5 - MH wh - 70. 4. 22.0 - - 8.3 52.3 745.7 - - 95.6 66.6 267.8 - - 0 7.0 4.4 - - AU 66.8 7.8 2. - - AU0 0 4.0 0. - - AU0 0 4.0 4.7 - - AU 0 4.0 2.0 Chapple - - AU3 0 Chapple - - (.0) (4.7) Chapple - - (.0) (0.9) Chapple - - AU2.4 (27.6) (538.9) Chapple - MH wh - 9. (9.9) (00.9) Chapple - MH wh - 20.7 (8.3) (76.0) Chapple - - 37.4 8.4 7. Chapple - - 37.9 8.9 033.3 Chapple - - 67.6 38.6 49.0 Chapple - - 82. 53. 203.0 Chapple - - AU0 (.0) (36.2) Chapple - - AU 4.5 (44.5) (3.7) Chapple - - AU4 63 (63.0) (43.9) Chapple - MH wh - AU2 (.0) (6.8) Chapple - MH wh - (.0) (0.8) Chapple - MH wh - 87.0 9.0.7 Dundas - - (.0) (.0) Dundas - - AU2 57.2.2 209.8 Dundas - - 7.6 42.6 48.0 Dundas - - 72.2 43.2 2.4 Dundas - - 88.4.4 62.7 Dundas - - AU (.0) (5.4) Gil - MH wh - AU3 0 Gil - - AU3 3.9 0 3.9 3.7 Gil - - AU2 3.3 (.7) (88.) Gil - MH wh - 27.4 (.6) (2.0) Gil - MH wh - 35.3 6.3 2.6 Gil - - 36.2 7.2 008.3 Gil - - 44.7 5.7 527.9 Gil - - 74.7 45.7 02.0 Gil - - 97.9.9 9.4 Gil - - AU0 0 4.0 3.8 Gil - MH wh - AU2 (.0) (53.6) Gil - MH wh - 0 2.2 - - AU3 0 - - (.0) (89.6) - MH wh - 33.9 4.9 44.6 - - AU2 43.5 4.5 9.5 - - 57.9.9 79.4 - MH wh - 62.8 33.8 4.9 - - 67.8 38.8 704.3 - - 78. 49. 388.9 - - 83.5 54.5 024.0 - - AU0 5.3 (7.7) (2.8) - - AU 66.4 7.4 3.8 - MH wh - 8.6 (.4) (5.3) - MH wh - 3.3 (36.7) (24.7) - MH wh - AU2 0 0.5 - MH wh - n/a - - AU3 0 27

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - 9.7 (5.3) (2.9) - - 0 4. - MH mm - 0 0. - - 0 9.2 - MH mm - 0 0.9 - - AU2.6 39.6 239.0 - - 7.6 42.6 93.8 - MH wh - 73.4 44.4 36 - - 77.8 48.8 638.3 - - 8 5.3 3.9 - MH wh - 86.0 57.0 33.4 - - 86.5 57.5 5339.5 - - AU0 5. (7.9) (2.7) - - AU 0 4.0 6.0 - MH wh - 3. (54.9) (9.2) - MH wh - 0 - MH wh - AU2 00. 32. - - (.0) (8.2) - - 67.2 38.2 5.8 - MH wh - 69.2 4 4 - - 85.3 56.3 35.7 - - 90.7 6.7 4.6 - - AU2 9.0 62.0 2.0 - - 9.4 62.4 998.3 - MH wh - 93.7 64.7 7.7 - - AU 90. 3. 27.5 - - AU0 98.5 39.5 35.3 - MH wh - 5.8 (6.2) (5.6) - MH wh - AU2 0 0.6 Helmcken - - AU3 0 Helmcken - - 0 2.8 Helmcken - - AU2 9.6 (9.4) (5.2) Helmcken - - 8. (0.9) (355.8) Helmcken - MH wh - 8.4 (0.6) (98.0) Helmcken - MH wh - 49.5 20.5.6 Helmcken - - 7.0 42.0 39. Helmcken - - 97.4.4 30.8 Helmcken - - 0 7.0 26.7 Helmcken - - AU0 0 4.0 2.2 Helmcken - - AU 0 4.0 7.4 Helmcken - MH wh - 0. - - AU3 0 - - (.0) (6.2) - - AU2 4. (24.9) (380.) - - 53.6 24.6 555 - - 57.2.2 699.6 - MH wh - 62.3 33.3 43.5 - MH wh - 78.3 49.3 206.9 - - 8.9 52.9 5. - - 96.3 67.3 85 - - AU 0 4.0 7.7 - - AU4 63 (63.0) (7.8) - MH wh - AU2 (.0) (7.5) - MH wh - 0 8.8 - MH wh - 0 0.5 Iknouk - CWH wm - 0 Iknouk - MH mm - 0 3.7 Johnston - CWH vm - AU3 0 Johnston - - AU3 0 Johnston - CWH vm - (.0) (22.3)

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Johnston - - (.0) (0.6) Johnston - CWH vm - AU0 69.6 44.6 3.6 Johnston - MH mm - 88.5 63.5 853. Johnston - CWH vm - 92.5 67.5 486.6 Johnston - - 93.3.3 463.3 Johnston - CWH vm - 94.6 69.6 6.0 Johnston - - 95.6 70.6 426.0 Johnston - CWH vm - AU 98.4 73.4 65.2 Johnston - MH mm - 0 23.0 Johnston - CWH vm - 3.0 (5.0) (5.) Johnston - CWH vm - 96.3.3 770.6 Johnston - - 99.5 7.5 784.3 Johnston - MH mm - 0 9.2 Johnston - CWH vm - AU2 0 349.5 Johnston - - AU2 0 88.8 Johnston - - AU 0 4.0 8.4 Johnston - MH mm - AU2 0 65 35.0.9 - - AU3 0 - MH wh - AU3 0 - - (.0) (66.2) - CWH vm - (.0) (.2) - - (.0) () - CWH vm - 0 2.5 - MH mm - 00. 75. - CWH vm - 56.9.9 2.0 - - 0.3 - - AU2 53.5 24.5 494.8 - - 66.3 37.3 42.5 - MH wh - 69.8 40.8 698.4 - - 70.8 4.8 40.4 - - 82.7 53.7 35.5 - - 85.3 56.3.2 - MH wh - 88.7.7 756.6 - - AU0 (.0) (47.9) - - AU 33.8 (.2) (42.5) - - AU4 63 (63.0) (4.2) - MH wh - AU2 35.7 (32.3) (5.6) - MH wh - 99.4 3.4 4.6 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - - AU3 0 - - (.0) (0.6) - CWH vm - AU0 5.8 (9.2) (2.0) - CWH vm - 9.4 (5.6) (7.6) - CWH vm - AU 26.0.0 0.8 - MH mm - 5.2 4.6 - - 69.4 44.4 974.0 - CWH vm - 73.6 48.6 056.0 - CWH vm - 75.9.9 308.5 - - 92. 67. 358.9 - MH mm - 95.5 70.5 47.5 - MH mm - 34.6 6.6 0.4 - CWH vm - AU2 52.7 24.7 3.8 - CWH vm - 57.3.3 96.0 - - AU2 64.9 36.9 4.4 - - 76.0 48.0 38.0 - - AU 63.2 4.2 3.0 - - AU0 64.7 5.7 2.5 - MH mm - AU2 5.0 65 (4.0) (5.4) - MH mm - AU n/a Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU3 0

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU3 0 Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - AU3 0 0 0 9. Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU 44.8 9.8 2.2 Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - 60.7 35.7 24.9 Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm -.6 43.6 077.6 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - 73.2 48.2 5.7 Khutzeymateen Park - - 77.2 52.2 5.9 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - 83.8 58.8 227.9 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - 84.4.4 96.8 Khutzeymateen Park - - 89.9 64.9 373.5 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - 93.8.8 342. Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU0 97.7 72.7 94.4 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - 0 9.7 Khutzeymateen Park - - AU2 (.0) (.3) Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU2 83.3 55.3 8.8 Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - 0 3.5 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - 0 38.6 Khutzeymateen Park - - 0 62.8 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU 65.7 6.7 23.0 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU0 85.6 26.6 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - 0 4.0 7.6 Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - AU2 98.6 65 33.6 7.7 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - 0 65 35.0 37.6 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - 0 65 35.0 0.5 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU2 58.6 (9.4) (4.) Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - AU n/a - CWH vm - AU3 0 - - AU3 0 - CWH vm - (.0) (30.) - - (.0) (3.5) - MH mm - 5.0 26.0 695. - CWH vm - AU0 6 35.3 35.9 - - 65.9 40.9 7.8 - CWH vm - AU 76.5 5.5 6. - CWH vm - 76.6 5.6 408.6 - CWH vm - 78. 53. 997.4 - MH mm - 93.7.7 9. - - 97.7 72.7 043.7 - CWH vm - AU2 27.2 (0.8) (2.5) - MH mm - 36.4 8.4 7. - - 55.9 27.9 64.9 - CWH vm - 65.3 37.3 365.6 - - AU2 9.8 63.8 62. - CWH vm - 0 36.8 - - 0 - MH wh - 3.7 (5.3) (0.) - - 22.4 (6.6) () - - 0 7.0 0. - MH mm - (.0) (2.7) - - AU 0 4.0 52. - MH mm - AU2 78.3 65 3.3 3.3 Kiltuish - CWH vm - 4.2 6.2.0 Kiltuish - CWH vm - 60.5 35.5 44.2 Kiltuish - - 7.9 46.9 6.9 Kiltuish - - 87.3 62.3 24.7 Kiltuish - MH mm - 0 0.9 Kiltuish - CWH vm -.7 40.7 52.2 Kiltuish - - 76.4 48.4 7.2 Kiltuish - MH mm - 96.9.9 7.9 Kiltuish - - AU2 0.0 30

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Kiltuish - CWH vm - AU2 0.4 Kitkiata - - AU3 0 Kitkiata - CWH vm - AU3 0 Kitkiata - - (.0) (2.7) Kitkiata - - (.0) (.8) Kitkiata - CWH vm - 2.5 (2.5) (65.3) Kitkiata - CWH vm - AU 77.7 52.7 23.4 Kitkiata - CWH vm - 8.3 56.3 09.2 Kitkiata - MH mm - 87.7 62.7 492.8 Kitkiata - - 94.7 69.7 444.3 Kitkiata - - 94.9 69.9.2 Kitkiata - CWH vm - 96.3 7.3 2382.6 Kitkiata - MH mm - 0 Kitkiata - CWH vm - (.0) (.6) Kitkiata - - 99.5 7.5 652.6 Kitkiata - CWH vm - 99.9 7.9 44.6 Kitkiata - MH mm - 0 39.3 Kitkiata - CWH vm - AU2 0 3.7 Kitkiata - CWH vm - 0.7 Kitkiata - - AU2 0 8.3 Kitkiata - - 65.9 36.9 30.8 Kitkiata - - AU2 92.5 63.5 9.9 Kitkiata - - 92.7 63.7 79.7 Kitkiata - - 95.9 66.9 6.2 Kitkiata - MH wh - 96.6 67.6 42.6 Kitkiata - MH wh - 0 7.0 48.0 Kitkiata - MH wh - 0 - ESSFwv - 0 - MH mm 2-0 - CWH ws - AU3 0 - CWH ws 2 - AU3 0 - CWH wm - (.0) (4.7) - CWH wm - 9.6 (5.4) (.0) - MH mm - 84.4.4 2.7 - MH mm 2-92.8 67.8 69 - MH mm 2-94. 69. 8.5 - CWH ws 2-83.8 26 57.8 223.3 - CWH ws 2-89.0 26 63.0 3876.6 - CWH ws 2 - AU2 (.0) (2.3) - CWH ws 2-0 5 7.8 - CWH ws - AU (.0) (3.9) - CWH wm - (.0) (0.8) - CWH ws - AU0 3.7 (27.3) (2.5) - CWH ws - 49. (9.9) (320.5) - CWH ws - 78.0 9.0 42.9 - CWH ws 2 - AU 60 (6) (6.7) - CWH ws - 48.6 60 (.4) (73.3) - CWH ws 2-93.9 60 33.9 77.4 - CWH ws 2 - AU0 0 60 4 4.5 - MH mm 2 - AU2 65 (65.0) (0.) - CWH ws - AU2 70.5 65 5.5.7 - MH mm 2-0 65 35.0 2. Klekane - CWH vm - AU3 0 Klekane - CWH vm - AU (.0) (0.4) Klekane - MH mm - (.0) (24.0) Klekane - - 0.4 (24.6) (3) Klekane - CWH vm - 9.9 (5.) (7.7) Klekane - - 63.2 38.2 6.9 Klekane - CWH vm - 80. 55. 49.0 Klekane - MH mm - 96.6 7.6 3

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Klekane - CWH vm - AU2 (.0) (2.4) Klekane - - AU2 (.0) (0.5) Klekane - MH mm - (27.8) (.4) Klekane - - 9.0 (9.0) (83.4) Klekane - CWH vm - 56.2.2 89.3 Klekane - CWH vm - 0 8.0 Klekane - - 0 9.6 Kshwan - CWH wm - AU3 0 Kshwan - CWH wm - 56.9 3.9 808.5 Kshwan - MH mm - 74.3 49.3 674. Kshwan - CWH wm - 74.6 49.6 3.2 Kshwan - MH mm - 0 0.6 Kshwan - MH mm - 0 2. Kshwan - CWH wm - AU (.0) (75.) Kshwan - CWH wm - AU0 72. 3. 2.4 Kshwan - CWH wm - 0 4.0 6.9 Kshwan - CWH wm - 0 65 35.0 9. Kshwan - CWH wm - AU2 6.5 (6.5) (69.3) - - AU3 0 - - 0.5 (24.5) (86.5) - CWH vm -.7 34.7 0.9 - - 84.2.2 35.7 - MH mm - 99.7 74.7 6.8 - CWH vm - 0 - - 0 22.5 - - 94.5 66.5.3 - - AU2 0 0.5 - MH mm - 0 9.8 - - AU2 58.6.6 38. - - 69.6 40.6 23.7 - - 70. 4. 788.9 - - 83. 54. 03.5 - - 87.3 58.3 882.6 - MH wh - 90.4 6.4 677.3 - MH wh - 93.5 64.5 943.9 - - AU0 5.7 (53.3) (47.6) - - AU 2 (39.0) (20.4) - - AU4 63 (63.0) (58.7) - MH mm - AU2 0 65 35.0 - MH wh - (.0) (3.7) - MH wh - 92.7 24.7.4 - MH wh - 94.2 26.2 65.7 - MH wh - AU2 0 3.0 - MH wh - n/a - CWH vm - AU3 0 - - AU3 0 - CWH vm - 43.3 8.3 60.6 - MH mm - 7.0 46.0 5.6 - - 82.3 57.3 8 - CWH vm - AU 87.7 62.7 22.2 - - 88.7 63.7 75.8 - CWH vm - 89.5 64.5 53.6 - CWH vm - AU0 92.9 67.9 245.3 - CWH vm - 95. 70. 57.2 - - 0 3.4 - MH mm - 0 36.6 - - AU2 7.9 43.9 64.5 - MH mm - 47.0 45.2 - CWH vm - AU2 76. 48..0 - - 85.4 57.4 472.8 32

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - CWH vm - 9.5 63.5 334.8 - CWH vm - 0 45.6 - - 0 0. - - AU0 54. (4.9) (0.8) - - AU 98.4 39.4 9.9 - MH mm - AU2 0 65 35.0 2.4 Laredo - - AU3 0 Laredo - MH mm - 8.5 (6.5) (8.8) Laredo - - 42.2 7.2 7.9 Laredo - CWH vm - 80.9 55.9 22.4 Laredo - - 0 2.2 Laredo - CWH vm - 0 4.7 Laredo - MH mm - (.0) (.8) Laredo - CWH vm - (.0) (.) Laredo - - (.0) (0.7) Laredo - CWH vm - 0. Laredo - MH wh - 0.4 (8.6) (56.8) Laredo - - 24. (4.9) (678.5) Laredo - - AU2 37.6 8.6.4 Laredo - MH wh - 4.7 2.7.3 Laredo - - 79.4.4 67 Laredo - - 88.7.7 6.3 Laredo - - 9 6.2 526. Laredo - - AU 0 4.0 8.4 Laredo - - AU0 0 4.0 3. Laredo - MH wh - 79.4.4 2.8 Marmot - CWH wm - AU3 0 Marmot - CWH wm - 79.8 54.8 26.6 Marmot - MH mm - 89.8 64.8 3052.4 Marmot - CWH wm - 96.9 7.9 4222.8 Marmot - MH mm - 98.3 73.3 408.6 Marmot - MH mm - 0 6.2 Marmot - CWH wm - AU (.0) (8.2) Marmot - CWH wm - 79.6 20.6.7 Marmot - CWH wm - AU0 95.4 36.4 6.0 Marmot - MH mm - 0 4.0 4.4 Marmot - CWH wm - 96.7 65 3.7 6.7 Marmot - MH mm - AU2 98.6 65 33.6 2.4 Marmot - CWH wm - 0 65 35.0 26.2 Marmot - CWH wm - AU2 63.2 (4.8) (5.6) McCauley - - AU3 0 McCauley - - AU2 3.6 (.4) (4.3) McCauley - - 26.9 (2.) (57.4) McCauley - - 53.6 24.6 803.6 McCauley - - 97.. 8.9 McCauley - - 0 7.0 66.5 Monckton - - AU3 0 Monckton - - AU2 3.3 (.7) (362.2) Monckton - MH wh - 4.7 (24.3) (2.7) Monckton - - 2 (8.8) (854.4) Monckton - MH wh - 26.3 (2.7) (7.9) Monckton - - 47.6 8.6 6.0 Monckton - - 9 6.3 75. Monckton - - 93.8 64.8 204.5 Monckton - - AU 0 4.0 3.2 Monckton - MH wh - 0 Monckton - MH wh - 0 2.5 Observatory East - CWH wm - AU3 0 Observatory East - CWH wm - 40.8 5.8 89.3 Observatory East - CWH wm - 49.7 24.7 606.3 33

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Observatory East - MH mm - 9 65.2 955.7 Observatory East - MH mm - 0 7.9 Observatory East - CWH wm - (.0) (8.9) Observatory East - CWH wm - AU 0 4.0 5.7 Observatory East - CWH wm - 44.3 65 (20.7) (6.9) Observatory East - CWH wm - AU2 44.7 (23.3) (4.0) Observatory West - - AU3 0 Observatory West - CWH wm - AU3 0 Observatory West - MH mm - (.0) (2.7) Observatory West - CWH wm - 24.6 (0.4) (5.0) Observatory West - CWH wm - 33.6 8.6 44.2 Observatory West - MH mm - 67. 42. 49. Observatory West - MH mm - 0 8.5 Observatory West - - AU2 (.0) (6.9) Observatory West - -.7 30.7 774.2 Observatory West - - 67.9 38.9 57.3 Observatory West - - 73.8 44.8 95.4 Observatory West - MH wh - 79.4.4 379.5 Observatory West - CWH wm - AU (.0) (0.6) Observatory West - CWH wm -.7 65 3.7 7.8 Observatory West - CWH wm - AU2 (.0) (4.9) Olh - CWH wm - AU3 0 Olh - CWH wm - 8.3 (6.7) (384.9) Olh - MH mm - 2. (3.9) (74.) Olh - CWH wm - 32.2 7.2 26.6 Olh - MH mm 2-55.0 3.2 Olh - MH mm - 7.3 46.3 7.0 Olh - CWH ws 2-95.5 26 69.5 8.5 Olh - MH mm - 0 3.9 Olh - CWH wm - AU (.0) (4.2) Olh - CWH wm - (.0) (42.2) Olh - MH mm - AU2 65 (65.0) (6.6) Olh - CWH wm - 7.0 65 (48.0) (6.) Olh - CWH wm - AU2 (.0) (4.8) - - AU3 0 - - 5.4 (23.6) (30.6) - MH wh - 30.4.4 8.6 - - 77.2 48.2 4272.3 - - AU2 85.5 56.5 2.4 - - 9.0 62.0 0.9 - MH wh - 95.4 66.4 2.4 - - 99.9 70.9 84.3 - - AU 0 4.0 4.0 - MH wh - 0.9 Pearse - - AU3 3.2 0 3.2 3.4 Pearse - - AU2 49.4 20.4 23.2 Pearse - MH wh - 62.8 33.8 8.2 Pearse - - 65.0 36.0 558.4 Pearse - MH wh - 78.2 49.2 46.4 Pearse - - 79.4.4 5432.6 Pearse - - 82.5 53.5 70. Pearse - - 97.7.7 804.0 Pearse - - AU0 94.0 35.0 8.5 Pearse - - AU 0 4.0.3 Pearse - MH wh - 0 - - AU3 0 - - (.0) (35.5) - - 32. 3. 86.8 - - 44.8 5.8 6387.9 - MH wh - 54.6.6 2 34

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - 62.6 33.6 2669.8 - - 75.6 46.6 6.6 - - AU2 8 5.0 543.0 - MH wh - 80.5 5.5 333.6 - - AU0 (.0) (3.2) - MH wh - AU (.0) (0.) - - AU 5.3 (53.7) (22.2) - MH wh - AU2 38.3 (.7) (2.3) - MH wh - 78.8 0.8 6. - MH mm - AU 0 - - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - - AU3 0 - - (.0) (26.0) - CWH vm - (.0) (2) - CWH vm - AU.0 0. - CWH vm -. 34. 3.6 - CWH vm - AU0 62.8 37.8 56. - MH mm - 74.0 49.0 73.4 - CWH vm - 76.6 5.6 442.5 - MH mm - 76.7 5.7 54.3 - - 78.7 53.7 357.0 - - 8.6 56.6 4.4 - - 95.4 70.4 33.6 - - AU2 49.4 2.4 5.3 - CWH vm - AU2 62.0 34.0 3.4 - -.4 40.4 3.4 - MH mm - 76.5 48.5 0.5 - - 80.5 52.5 607.5 - CWH vm - 82.5 54.5 604.6 - CWH vm - 0 55.0 - - 58.8.8 38. - MH wh - 63.7 34.7 243.8 - - 64.4 35.4 30.9 - - 77.3 48.3 646.4 - - AU2 78.3 49.3 5.5 - - 92.0 63.0 082.9 - MH wh - 95.0 66.0 84.9 - MH wh - AU (.0) (9.8) - - AU4 (.0) (.2) - MH mm - AU4 (.0) (8.7) - - AU0 34.9 (24.) (2.9) - - AU 64.8 5.8 4.9 - - AU 69.2 4.9 - - AU0 84.5.5 6. - MH mm - 0 4.0 4. - MH mm - AU2 48.4 65 (6.6) (2.) - MH mm - 98.8 65 33.8 4.2 - MH wh - AU2 3. (36.9) (2.4) - MH wh - 89.2 2.2 39.7 - MH wh - 0 2.0 - - AU3 0 - - 6.7 (8.3) (23.9) - - AU2 2. (7.9) (5.8) - - 47.5 8.5 39.8 - - 70.6 4.6 56.6 - MH wh - 75. 46. 273.7 - MH wh - 80.7 5.7 07.4 - - 83.8 54.8 5.0 - - 86.9 57.9 8.8 35

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU 0 4.0 37. - MH wh - 96.2.2.7 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) () - - (.0) (.6) - CWH vm - (.0) (.5) - - (.0) (22.2) - CWH vm - AU0.9 (3.) (33.3) - MH mm - 58.8 33.8 - CWH vm - AU 60.6 35.6 02.0 - CWH vm - 66.8 4.8 49.7 - - 70.7 45.7 2227.5 - CWH vm - 47.0 482. - - 90.5 65.5 5.0 - MH mm - 97.4 72.4 44.6 - CWH vm - AU2 37.6 9.6 3.8 - - AU2 52.6 24.6 0. - MH mm - 66.5 38.5 34.6 - - 75.7 47.7 - CWH vm - 79.6 5.6 549.3 - - 0 0.6 - CWH vm - 0 42.5 - - 67.2 38.2 330. - MH wh - 77.2 48.2 47.6 - MH wh - 85.0 56.0 83.0 - - 9.9 62.9 322. - - 98.3 69.3 45.6 - - 0 7.0. - - AU 78.8 9.8 7. - MH mm - AU2 99.5 65 34.5 0.6 - MH wh - 0 - MH wh - 0.3 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU3 0 Skeena Islands - - AU3 0 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - (.0) (9.2) Skeena Islands - - (.0) () Skeena Islands - MH mm - (.0) (0.7) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU 2. (2.9) (.8) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU0 3.6 (.4) (6.5) Skeena Islands - MH mm - 49.0 24.0 85.7 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - 60.7 35.7 262.9 Skeena Islands - - 69.3 44.3 343.4 Skeena Islands - - 77.3 52.3 04.5 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - 8.3 56.3 207.0 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - 8.7 (9.3) (6.9) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - 76.9 48.9 47.4 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU2 8 52.2 33. Skeena Islands - - 88.8 60.8 5.5 Skeena Islands - MH mm - 0.0 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - - AU3 0 - - (.0) (8.) - CWH vm - 2.5 (22.5) (36.7) - CWH vm - AU0 46.0 2.0 22.5 - CWH vm - AU 49.6 24.6 40.7 - CWH vm -.8.8 38.7 - - 58.8 33.8 499. - MH mm - 72.4 47.4 26.9 - CWH vm - 76.6 5.6 97.0 36

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - MH mm - 80.8 55.8 206.0 - - 8.3 56.3 355.4 - CWH vm - AU4 0 8.3 - - AU2 78.9.9 63.8 - CWH vm - 84. 56. 000. - - 84.7 56.7 638. - CWH vm - AU2 88.7 60.7 0.9 - MH mm - 92.7 64.7 242.8 - CWH vm - 0 - MH wh - 27.7 (.3) (0.4) - - 5 2.3 97.7 - - 53.8 24.8 03.2 - MH wh - 6 3.0 35.4 - - AU2 88.4.4.7 - - 0 7.0 2.0 - MH mm - (.0) (0.5) - - AU 8 2.2 8.3 - - AU0 8 2.2 5.5 - MH mm - AU2 3.8 65 (33.2) (.) - MH wh - 0 0. - MH mm - AU0 n/a - MH mm - AU n/a Sparkling - CWH vm - AU3 0 Sparkling - CWH vm - AU0 (.0) (.2) Sparkling - MH mm - 76. 5. 95.4 Sparkling - - 84.0.0.4 Sparkling - CWH vm - 86. 6. 2. Sparkling - CWH vm - 88.3 63.3 448.0 Sparkling - CWH vm - 93.4.4 769.8 Sparkling - - 96.6 7.6 540.4 Sparkling - MH mm - 0 64.2 Sparkling - CWH vm - AU 0 79.2 Sparkling - - 0.6 Sparkling - CWH vm - 30.8 2.8.9 Sparkling - MH mm - 88.3 6 6.8 Sparkling - - AU2 94.5 66.5 79.7 Sparkling - - 95.4 67.4 658.6 Sparkling - CWH vm - 96.6.6 05.7 Sparkling - CWH vm - AU2 99.0 7.0 27.4 Sparkling - MH wh - 0 7.0 0. Sparkling - - AU0 90.5 3.5 6.7 Sparkling - - AU 98.2 39.2 26.8 Sparkling - MH mm - AU2 0 65 35.0. Stagoo - CWH ws - AU3 0 Stagoo - CWH wm - AU3 5.2 0 5.2 2.3 Stagoo - MH mm - 49.3 24.3 035. Stagoo - MH mm - 56.0 3.0 97. Stagoo - CWH wm - 58.4 33.4 2496. Stagoo - CWH wm - 6.0 36.0 6.0 Stagoo - MH mm 2-79.3 54.3 9. Stagoo - CWH ws 2-30.8 26 4.8.3 Stagoo - MH mm - 73.5 45.5 9.0 Stagoo - CWH wm - AU (.0) (5.0) Stagoo - CWH ws - (.0) (8.8) Stagoo - MH mm - (.0) (.) Stagoo - CWH ws - 2.0 (47.0) (4.3) Stagoo - CWH wm - AU0 43.7 (5.3) (24.) Stagoo - CWH wm - 8 2.2 57.0 Stagoo - CWH ws - 27.8 60 (32.2) (30.4) Stagoo - MH mm - AU2.5 65 (35.5) (8.) 37

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Stagoo - CWH wm - 0 65 35.0.4 Stagoo - CWH wm - 0 65 35.0 4.6 Stagoo - CWH wm - AU2 34.6 (33.4) (82.7) Stagoo - CWH ws - AU2 65 (65.0) (9.) Stephens - - (.0) (.6) Stephens - - AU2 0.5 (8.5) (464.8) Stephens - - 52.4 23.4 093. Stephens - - 73.6 44.6 204.4 - - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - MH wh - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (0.6) - MH mm - 5.0 (2) (8.2) - MH mm - 2.5 (3.5) () - -.6 3.6 7. - - 42.3 7.3 7.5 - CWH vm - 53.6.6 90.9 - CWH vm - 54.9.9 78.2 - CWH vm - AU2 (.0) (7.2) - MH mm - 9.0 (9.0) (3) - - 7. (0.9) (.3) - CWH vm - 33.6 5.6 52. - CWH vm - 42.9 4.9 9.2 - - 80.4 52.4 6.9 - - AU2 8.9 (20.) (9.7) - MH wh - 4.2 (4.8) (84.7) - MH wh - 9.9 (9.) (0.9) - - 35.5 6.5 07 - - 44.9 5.9 492.5 - - 67.6 38.6 86.6 - - 70.4 4.4 632.3 - - AU0 (.0) (0.6) - - AU 38.7 (2) (8.5) - MH mm - 99.9 65 34.9 - MH wh - 45.7 (22.3) (5.4) - MH wh - 0 0.6 Tolmie - - AU2 (.0) (4.4) Tolmie - MH wh - 0.5 (.5) (7.2) Tolmie - - 24. (4.9) (5.9) Tolmie - - 97.9.9 5.6 Tolmie - MH wh - 0 7.0 3.0 Tolmie - - 0 7.0 7.5 Tolmie - - 0 7.0 63.4 Tolmie - - AU4 63 (63.0) (3.0) - CWH vm - AU3 0 - - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (3.) - CWH vm - (.0) (66.0) - - (.0) (9.0) - MH mm - 20.8 (4.2) (3.8) - - 3.7 6.7 82.3 - CWH vm - 39.4 4.4 338.7 - CWH vm - 62.3 37.3 9.3 - MH mm - 67.7 42.7 03.4 - -.5 43.5 52. - CWH vm - AU0 69.5 44.5 7.5 - CWH vm - AU 96.7 7.7 9.8 - CWH vm - AU2 5.3 (22.7) (5.) - - 0. (7.9) (35.4) - - AU2 6.3 (.7) () 38

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - CWH vm -.2 0.9 - - 53.. 453. - MH mm - 54.7 26.7 65.0 - CWH vm - 64.9 36.9 630.5 - - AU0 (.0) (3.8) - - AU4 (.0) (0.9) - MH mm - (.0) () - - AU 0 4.0 - MH mm - 65 (65.0) (.3) Trutch - - AU2.8 (7.2) (23.2) Trutch - - 22.3 (6.7) (749.5) Trutch - - 82.6 53.6 60.9 Trutch - - 0 7.0 5.0 - - AU3 0 - MH wh - AU3 0 - - (.0) (3.2) - - AU2 46.6 7.6 9.6 - -. 2. 679.2 - - 6 3.2 77.7 - -.7 39.7 6270.6 - MH wh - 73.7 44.7 4.5 - - 78.8 49.8 238.0 - MH wh - 82.9 53.9 707.8 - - AU0 (.0) (.0) - - AU 54.4 (4.6) (7.7) - MH wh - AU2 75.6 7.6 5.2 - MH wh - 87.3 9.3 9.8 - MH wh - 0 0. - - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - - AU3 0 - - (.0) (3.5) - - (.0) (0.) - CWH vm - AU 46.5 2.5 - MH mm -. 34. 435.4 - CWH vm - 69.8 44.8.5 - - 75.6.6 934.2 - CWH vm - 84.8.8 407.7 - - 99. 74. 23.5 - CWH vm - AU0 0 44.0 - MH mm - 0.5 - - AU2 5.4 23.4.2 - CWH vm - AU2 54.6 26.6 26.8 - MH mm - 73.0 45.0 87.7 - - 82.2 54.2 499.3 - CWH vm - 84.5 56.5 475.9 - CWH vm - 0.6 - - 0 0.5 - - 46.5 7.5.8 - MH wh - 5 2.0 32.6 - MH wh - 58.0.0 389.4 - - 60.8 3.8 30.5 - -.7 39.7 746.7 - - 77.2 48.2 2456. - - AU2 96.2 67.2 80.7 - MH mm - (.0) (4.) - - AU 9.9 (39.) (26.3) - - AU 48.4 (0.6) (4.0) - - AU0 0 4.0 - MH wh - AU 0 4.0.6 39

Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - MH mm - AU2 0 65 35.0 0.7 - MH wh - AU2 38.2 (.8) (2.7) - MH wh - 0.2 - - AU3 0 - - AU3 0 - MH mm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU3 0.8 0 0.8.7 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (7.7) - - (.0) (2.0) - CWH vm - (.0) (57.0) - - (.0) (0.) - MH mm - 9.7 (5.3) (80.8) - - 20.7 (4.3) (08.5) - CWH vm - AU0 24. (0.9) (0.9) - CWH vm - 34.9 9.9 96.2 - CWH vm - 55. 30. 75.6 - MH mm -.3 43.3 0.4 - - 74.6 49.6 30.6 - CWH vm - AU 76.0 5.0 26.4 - - AU2 2.8 (.2) (0.4) - MH mm - 2.8 (.2) (344.7) - - 5.5 (2.5) (353.7) - CWH vm - 33.5 5.5 205.5 - CWH vm - 76.8 48.8 7.2 - CWH vm - AU2 77.8 49.8 4. - - 98.2 7 2.7 - MH wh - 5.6 (23.4) (57.8) - MH wh - 3.8 (5.2) (55.2) - - AU2 9.4 (9.6) (3.9) - - 30.5.5 0.9 - - 32.4 3.4 94. - -.0 39.0 5.0 - - 80.8 5.8 26.7 - - AU0 (.0) (3.) - - AU 32.9 (26.) (.3) - - AU 36.6 (22.4) (2.7) - MH wh - 73.5 5.5 0.5 - MH wh - AU2 0 0. - MH wh - 0.9 40

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Anyox - CWH wm - AU2 (.0) (.5) Anyox - CWH wm - AU3 0 Anyox - CWH wm - 2.5 65 (52.5) (272.2) Anyox - CWH wm - (.0) (.) Anyox - CWH wm - (.0) (304.5) Anyox - CWH wm - 2.9 (22.) () Anyox - MH mm - 5.6 23.6.8 Anyox - MH mm - (.0) () Anyox - MH mm - 8.6 (6.4) (08.6) Aristazabal - - AU0 (.0) (2.9) Aristazabal - - AU2.8 (27.2) (42.5) Aristazabal - - 84.6 55.6 27.3 Aristazabal - - 24.3 (4.7) (702.3) Aristazabal - - 82.3 53.3 03.4 Aristazabal - - 95.9 66.9 485. Banks - - AU2 30.7.7 238.6 Banks - - AU3 0 Banks - - 83.4 54.4 2.8 Banks - - 60.6 3.6 256.6 Banks - - (.0) (3.6) Banks - - 63.3 34.3 22.8 Banks - - 72.7 43.7 2065.5 Banks - MH wh - AU2 0. Banks - MH wh - 96.5 67.5 2.8 Banks - MH wh - 0 7.0 6.0 Belle Bay - - AU2 0 7.0 0.6 Belle Bay - - 0 7.0 370.9 Belle Bay - - 0 0.9 Belle Bay - - 99. 70. 364.0 Belle Bay - - 99.8 70.8 222.4 Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU0 0 4.0 0.9 Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU 69.6 0.6 3.3 Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU2 7.4 3.4 2.4 Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU3 0 Belle Bay - CWH wm - 49.6 65 (5.4) (5.6) Belle Bay - CWH wm - 86.2 65 2.2 240. Belle Bay - CWH wm - 54.4 (4.6) (.8) Belle Bay - CWH wm - 77.7 52.7 909.4 Belle Bay - CWH wm - 85.8 60.8 493.3 Belle Bay - MH mm - 99.4 74.4 36.8 Belle Bay - MH mm - 75.5.5 748.5 Belle Bay - MH wh - 0 7.0 3.6 Belle Bay - MH wh - 0 7.5 Belle Bay - MH wh - 99.4 70.4 880.6 - CWH vm - AU0.4 (23.6) (79.6) - CWH vm - AU 7.5 (7.5) (20.8) - CWH vm - AU2.7 40.7 6.7 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (3.4) - CWH vm - 74.3 46.3 75.8 - CWH vm - 76.5 48.5 554.3 - CWH vm - 2.5 (2.5) (83.6) - CWH vm - 52. 27. 449.2 - CWH vm - 49.4 24.4 269.2 - - AU0 52.3 (6.7) (3.3) - - AU 94.0 35.0 4. 4

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU2 2.3 (5.7) (9.6) - - AU3 0 - - AU4 (.0) (.6) - - 26.2 (.8) (0.8) - - 76.4 48.4 53.5 - - 4.5 (20.5) (7.7) - - 82.4 57.4 977.6 - - 62.2 37.2 447.8 - MH mm - AU2 6.3 65 (3.7) () - MH mm - 88.4 60.4 2.5 - MH mm - 98.6 73.6 0. - MH mm - 56.7 3.7 773.0 - - AU (.0) (42.) - - AU2 (.0) (5.3) - - AU3 0 - - 55.2 26.2 7.0 - - 92.4 63.4 324.4 - - (.0) (4.) - - 30.8.8 7.9 - - 98.6 69.6 5.6 - CWH vm - AU0 23.2 (.8) (2.4) - CWH vm - AU 8.0 (7.0) (24.) - CWH vm - AU2 2.8 (5.2) (.0) - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (24.5) - CWH vm - 74.9 46.9 239.0 - CWH vm - 83. 55. 2473.8 - CWH vm -.6 (23.4) (.7) - CWH vm - 55.4 30.4 7.6 - CWH vm - 67. 42. 39.9 - - AU (.0) (3.) - - AU2 0 2.7 - - AU4 (.0) (0.6) - - 4 2.2 5.5 - - 78.. 248.8 - - (.0) (0.6) - -.6 43.6 487.8 - - 87.0 62.0 339.6 - MH mm - 63.6 35.6 269.2 - MH mm - 30.8 5.8 2.0 - MH mm - 87.3 62.3 25. - MH wh - 96.4 67.4 4. - MH wh -.7 (39.3) (.4) - MH wh - 88.3.3 32.3 - - AU (.0) (3.6) - - AU2 0 7.0 5.2 - - AU3 0 - - 94.4 65.4 3.5 - - 6.2 (2.8) (2.5) - - 95.8 66.8 99.9 - CWH vm - AU0 95.5 70.5 22.5 - CWH vm - AU 80.4 55.4 37.9 - CWH vm - AU2 73.5 45.5 4.4 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (0.6) - CWH vm -.6 22.6.8 - CWH vm - 80.5 52.5 226.5 - CWH vm - (.0) (2.) - CWH vm - 76. 5. 442.9 - CWH vm - 70.9 45.9 365. 42

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU0 0 4.0 0.4 - - AU 0 4.0.6 - - AU2 8.2 53.2 3.7 - - 32.4 4.4 0.9 - - 93. 65. 545.7 - - (.0) (.) - - 88.6 63.6 340. - - 79.0 54.0 333.7 - MH mm - AU2 64.5 65 (0.5) () - MH mm - 88.5 60.5 0. - MH mm - 98.2 73.2. - MH mm - 8.5 56.5 066.2 - MH wh - 70.6 4.6 32.6 - MH wh - 0 3.9 - MH wh - 65. 36. 53.9 Butedale - - (.0) () Butedale - CWH vm - 2.8 (.2) () Butedale - - (.0) (0.) Butedale - - (.0) () Butedale - MH mm - (.0) (0.6) Butedale - MH mm - (.0) () Butedale - MH wh - (.0) (0.5) Campania - - AU2 0.6 (.4) (3000.5) Campania - -.7 (3.3) (53.5) Campania - - 52.7 23.7 7.6 Campania - - 48.4 9.4 7.8 Campania - MH wh - AU2 (.0) (43.6) Campania - MH wh - (.0) (0.8) Campania - MH wh - (.0) (3.2) - - AU0 0 4.0.5 - - AU2 66.2 37.2 37. - - AU3 0 - - 9. 62. 370. - - 40.7.7 4.0 - - 83.6 54.6.8 - - 53.4 24.4 857.9 - MH wh - 0 2.0 - MH wh - 8.6 (0.4) (2.) - MH wh - 0 8.0 - MH wh - 46.2 7.2 6.8 - - AU0 0 4.0 4.7 - - AU 0 4.0 2.0 - - AU2 49.5 20.5 8. - - AU3 0 - - 0 7.0 4.4 - -.3 3 7.2 - - (.0) () - - 95.6 66.6 267.8 - - 8. 52. 74 - CWH vm - AU0 39. 4. 9.7 - CWH vm - AU 77.4 52.4 63.4 - CWH vm - AU2 76.7 48.7 6.8 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - 69.3 4.3 6.7 - CWH vm - 8.2 53.2 443.2 - CWH vm - 20. (4.9) (5.2) - CWH vm - 63.4 38.4 488.3 - CWH vm - 80. 55. 3.5 - - AU0 9.4 (39.6) (0.) - - AU 66.7 7.7 2. 43

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU2 42. 4. 5. - - 57.7.7.3 - - (.0) (2.5) - - 77.9 52.9 382.0 - - 84.0.0 2422.4 - MH mm - AU 0 - MH mm -.4 22.4.9 - MH mm - 97.3 72.3 46.3 - MH mm - 85.3 6 2095.2 - MH wh - 0.5 (8.5) (52.0) - MH wh - 70. 4. 22.0 Chapple - - AU0 (.0) (36.2) Chapple - - AU 4.5 (44.5) (3.7) Chapple - - AU2.4 (27.6) (538.9) Chapple - - AU3 0 Chapple - - AU4 63 (63.0) (43.9) Chapple - - 82. 53. 203.0 Chapple - - 37.9 8.9 033.3 Chapple - - (.0) (4.7) Chapple - - 67.6 38.6 49.0 Chapple - - 37.4 8.4 7. Chapple - MH wh - AU2 (.0) (6.8) Chapple - MH wh - (.0) (0.8) Chapple - MH wh - 9. (9.9) (00.9) Chapple - MH wh - 87.0 9.0.7 Chapple - MH wh - 20.7 (8.3) (76.0) Dundas - - AU (.0) (5.4) Dundas - - AU2 65.0 36.0 8.3 Dundas - - (.0) (.0) Dundas - - 46.0 55.4 Dundas - - 88.4.4 62.7 Dundas - - 72.8 43.8 692.7 Gil - - AU0 0 4.0 3.8 Gil - - AU2 3.3 (.7) (88.) Gil - - AU3 3.9 0 3.9 3.7 Gil - - 74.7 45.7 02.0 Gil - - 36.2 7.2 008.3 Gil - - 97.9.9 9.4 Gil - - 44.7 5.7 527.9 Gil - MH wh - AU2 (.0) (53.6) Gil - MH wh - AU3 0 Gil - MH wh - 27.4 (.6) (2.0) Gil - MH wh - 0 2.2 Gil - MH wh - 35.3 6.3 2.6 - - AU0 5.3 (7.7) (2.8) - - AU 54.6 (4.4) (2.3) - - AU2 43.5 4.5 9.5 - - AU3 0 - - 54.7.7 70.6 - - 75.8 46.8 3636.5 - - (.0) (89.6) - - 63.0 34.0 66.9 - - 82.5 53.5 004.2 - MH wh - AU2 0 0.5 - MH wh - 8.6 (.4) (5.3) - MH wh - 33.9 4.9 44.6 - MH wh - n/a - MH wh - 3.3 (36.7) (24.7) - MH wh - 62.8 33.8 4.9 - - AU0 5. (7.9) (2.7) 44

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU 0 4.0 6.0 - - AU2 67.3 38.3 230.7 - - AU3 0 - - 56.3 27.3 24.4 - - 78.7 49.7 2424.9 - - 9.7 (5.3) (2.9) - - 72.6 43.6 464.6 - - 85.3 56.3 52.8 - - 0 9.2 - - 0 4. - MH mm - 0 0.9 - MH mm - 0 0. - MH wh - AU2 00. 32. - MH wh - 0 - MH wh - 86.0 57.0 33.4 - MH wh - 3. (54.9) (9.2) - MH wh - 73.4 44.4 36 - - AU0 97.2 38.2 34.2 - - AU 87.9.9.5 - - AU2 90.5 6.5 0.9 - - 67.2 38.2 5.8 - - 89.9 60.9 76.4 - - (.0) (8.2) - - 8. 52. 0.5 - - 89.2 6 927.8 - MH wh - AU2 0 0.6 - MH wh - 69.2 4 4 - MH wh - 5.8 (6.2) (5.6) - MH wh - 93.7 64.7 7.7 Helmcken - - AU0 0 4.0 2.2 Helmcken - - AU 0 4.0 7.4 Helmcken - - AU2 9.6 (9.4) (5.2) Helmcken - - AU3 0 Helmcken - - 0 7.0 26.7 Helmcken - - 8. (0.9) (3.7) Helmcken - - 0 2.8 Helmcken - - 97.4.4 30.8 Helmcken - - 7.0 42.0 39. Helmcken - MH wh - 8.4 (0.6) (98.0) Helmcken - MH wh - 0. Helmcken - MH wh - 49.5 20.5.6 - - AU 0 4.0 7.7 - - AU2 4. (24.9) (380.) - - AU3 0 - - AU4 63 (63.0) (7.8) - - 8.9 52.9 5. - - 53.6 24.6 555 - - (.0) (6.2) - - 96.3 67.3 85 - - 57.2.2 699.5 - MH wh - AU2 (.0) (7.5) - MH wh - 0 0.5 - MH wh - 78.3 49.3 206.9 - MH wh - 0 8.8 - MH wh - 62.3 33.3 43.5 Iknouk - CWH wm - 0 Iknouk - MH mm - 0 3.7 Johnston - CWH vm - AU0 69.6 44.6 3.6 Johnston - CWH vm - AU 98.4 73.4 65.2 Johnston - CWH vm - AU2 0 349.5 45

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Johnston - CWH vm - AU3 0 Johnston - CWH vm - 3.0 (5.0) (5.) Johnston - CWH vm - 96.3.3 770.6 Johnston - CWH vm - (.0) (22.3) Johnston - CWH vm - 94.6 69.6 6.0 Johnston - CWH vm - 92.5 67.5 486.6 Johnston - - AU 0 4.0 8.4 Johnston - - AU2 0 88.8 Johnston - - AU3 0 Johnston - - 99.5 7.5 784.3 Johnston - - (.0) (0.6) Johnston - - 95.6 70.6 426.0 Johnston - - 93.3.3 463.3 Johnston - MH mm - AU2 0 65 35.0.9 Johnston - MH mm - 0 9.2 Johnston - MH mm - 0 23.0 Johnston - MH mm - 88.5 63.5 853. - - AU0 (.0) (47.9) - - AU 2.3 (37.7) (63.4) - - AU2 5.9 22.9 462.4 - - AU3 0 - - AU4 63 (63.0) (4.2) - - 70.8 4.8 40.4 - - 84.0 55.0 902.0 - - (.0) (66.2) - - 62.0 33.0 0.8 - - 80.5 5.5 3388. - CWH vm - 56.9.9 2.0 - CWH vm - (.0) (.2) - CWH vm - 0 2.5 - - 0.3 - - (.0) () - MH mm - 00. 75. - MH wh - AU2 35.7 (32.3) (5.6) - MH wh - AU3 0 - MH wh - 88.7.7 756.6 - MH wh - 99.4 3.4 4.6 - MH wh - 69.8 40.8 698.4 - CWH vm - AU0 5.8 (9.2) (2.0) - CWH vm - AU 26.0.0 0.8 - CWH vm - AU2 52.7 24.7 3.8 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - 67.3 39.3.8 - CWH vm - 9.4 (5.6) (7.6) - CWH vm - 73.6 48.6 056.0 - CWH vm - 75.9.9 308.5 - - AU0 64.7 5.7 2.5 - - AU 63.2 4.2 3.0 - - AU2 64.9 36.9 4.4 - - AU3 0 - - 76.0 48.0 38.0 - - (.0) (0.6) - - 92. 67. 358.9 - - 69.4 44.4 974.0 - MH mm - AU n/a - MH mm - AU2 5.0 65 (4.0) (5.4) - MH mm - 34.6 6.6 0.4 - MH mm - 95.5 70.5 47.5 - MH mm - 5.2 4.6 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU0 97.7 72.7 94.4 46

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU 44.8 9.8 2.2 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU2 83.3 55.3 8.8 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU3 0 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - 0 38.6 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - 0 9.7 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - 73.2 48.2 5.7 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - 84.4.4 96.8 Khutzeymateen Park - - AU2 (.0) (.3) Khutzeymateen Park - - 0 62.8 Khutzeymateen Park - - 77.2 52.2 5.9 Khutzeymateen Park - - 89.9 64.9 373.5 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU0 85.6 26.6 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU 65.7 6.7 23.0 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU2 58.6 (9.4) (4.) Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU3 0 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - 0 65 35.0 0.5 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - 0 65 35.0 37.6 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - 0 4.0 7.6 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - 93.8.8 342. Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - 83.8 58.8 227.9 Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - AU n/a Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - AU2 98.6 65 33.6 7.7 Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - AU3 0 0 0 9. Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - 0 3.5 Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - 60.7 35.7 24.9 Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm -.6 43.6 077.6 - - 0 7.0 0. - - 22.4 (6.6) () - CWH vm - AU0 6 35.3 35.9 - CWH vm - AU 76.5 5.5 6. - CWH vm - AU2 27.2 (0.8) (2.5) - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - 0 36.8 - CWH vm - 65.3 37.3 365.6 - CWH vm - (.0) (30.) - CWH vm - 78. 53. 997.4 - CWH vm - 76.6 5.6 408.6 - - AU 0 4.0 52. - - AU2 9.8 63.8 62. - - AU3 0 - - 0 - - 55.9 27.9 64.9 - - (.0) (3.5) - - 97.7 72.7 043.7 - - 65.9 40.9 7.8 - MH mm - AU2 78.3 65 3.3 3.3 - MH mm - 36.4 8.4 7. - MH mm - (.0) (2.7) - MH mm - 93.7.7 9. - MH mm - 5.0 26.0 695. - MH wh - 3.7 (5.3) (0.) Kiltuish - CWH vm - AU2 0.4 Kiltuish - CWH vm -.7 40.7 52.2 Kiltuish - CWH vm - 58.8 33.8 42.0 Kiltuish - CWH vm - 4.2 6.2.0 Kiltuish - - AU2 0.0 Kiltuish - - 76.4 48.4 7.2 Kiltuish - - 7.9 46.9 6.9 Kiltuish - - 87.3 62.3 24.7 Kiltuish - MH mm - 96.9.9 7.9 47

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Kiltuish - MH mm - 0 0.9 Kitkiata - - AU2 92.5 63.5 9.9 Kitkiata - - AU3 0 Kitkiata - - 92.7 63.7 79.7 Kitkiata - - (.0) (2.7) Kitkiata - - 65.9 36.9 30.8 Kitkiata - - 97.2.2 67.5 Kitkiata - CWH vm - AU 77.7 52.7 23.4 Kitkiata - CWH vm - AU2 0 3.7 Kitkiata - CWH vm - AU3 0 Kitkiata - CWH vm - 0.7 Kitkiata - CWH vm - 99.9 7.9 44.6 Kitkiata - CWH vm - 2.5 (2.5) (65.3) Kitkiata - CWH vm - 8.3 56.3 09.2 Kitkiata - CWH vm - 96.3 7.3 2382.6 Kitkiata - - AU2 0 8.3 Kitkiata - - 99.5 7.5 652.6 Kitkiata - - (.0) (.8) Kitkiata - - 94.9 69.9.2 Kitkiata - - 94.7 69.7 444.3 Kitkiata - MH mm - 0 39.3 Kitkiata - MH mm - 0 Kitkiata - MH mm - 87.7 62.7 492.8 Kitkiata - MH wh - 0 7.0 48.0 Kitkiata - MH wh - 0 Kitkiata - MH wh - 96.6 67.6 42.6 - CWH wm - (.0) (0.8) - CWH wm - (.0) (4.7) - CWH wm - 9.6 (5.4) (.0) - CWH ws - AU0 3.7 (27.3) (2.5) - CWH ws - AU (.0) (3.9) - CWH ws - AU2 70.5 65 5.5.7 - CWH ws - AU3 0 - CWH ws - 78.0 9.0 42.9 - CWH ws - 49.4 (9.6) (3.6) - CWH ws - 48.6 60 (.4) (73.3) - CWH ws 2 - AU0 0 60 4 4.5 - CWH ws 2 - AU 60 (6) (6.7) - CWH ws 2 - AU2 (.0) (2.3) - CWH ws 2 - AU3 0 - CWH ws 2-0 5 7.8 - CWH ws 2-93.9 60 33.9 77.4 - CWH ws 2-83.8 26 57.8 223.3 - CWH ws 2-89.0 26 63.0 3876.6 - ESSFwv - 26 (26.0) () - MH mm - 84.4.4 2.7 - MH mm 2 - AU2 65 (65.0) (0.) - MH mm 2-0 65 35.0 2. - MH mm 2 - n/a - MH mm 2-92.8 67.8 69 - MH mm 2-94. 69. 8.5 Klekane - CWH vm - AU (.0) (0.4) Klekane - CWH vm - AU2 (.0) (2.4) Klekane - CWH vm - AU3 0 Klekane - CWH vm - 0 8.0 Klekane - CWH vm - 56.2.2 89.3 Klekane - CWH vm - 80. 55. 49.0 Klekane - CWH vm - 9.9 (5.) (7.7) Klekane - - AU2 (.0) (0.5) Klekane - - 0 9.6 48

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Klekane - - 9.0 (9.0) (83.4) Klekane - - 63.2 38.2 6.9 Klekane - - 0.4 (24.6) (3) Klekane - MH mm - (27.8) (.4) Klekane - MH mm - 96.6 7.6 Klekane - MH mm - (.0) (24.0) Kshwan - CWH wm - AU0 72. 3. 2.4 Kshwan - CWH wm - AU (.0) (75.) Kshwan - CWH wm - AU2 6.5 (6.5) (69.3) Kshwan - CWH wm - AU3 0 Kshwan - CWH wm - 0 65 35.0 9. Kshwan - CWH wm - 0 4.0 6.9 Kshwan - CWH wm - 74.6 49.6 3.2 Kshwan - CWH wm - 56.9 3.9 808.5 Kshwan - MH mm - 0 2. Kshwan - MH mm - 0 0.6 Kshwan - MH mm - 74.3 49.3 674. - - AU0 5.7 (53.3) (47.6) - - AU 2 (39.0) (20.4) - - AU2 58.6.6 38. - - AU3 0 - - AU4 63 (63.0) (58.7) - - 69.6 40.6 23.7 - - 87.3 58.3 882.6 - - 0.4 (4.6) (5.6) - - 70. 4. 788.9 - - 83. 54. 03.5 - CWH vm -.7 34.7 0.9 - CWH vm - 0 - - AU2 0 0.5 - - 94.5 66.5.3 - - 0 22.5 - - 84.2.2 35.7 - MH mm - AU2 0 65 35.0 - MH mm - 0 9.8 - MH mm - 99.7 74.7 6.8 - MH wh - AU2 0 3.0 - MH wh - 92.7 24.7.4 - MH wh - 93.5 64.5 943.9 - MH wh - n/a - MH wh - 94.2 26.2 65.7 - MH wh - 90.4 6.4 677.3 - CWH vm - AU0 92.9 67.9 245.3 - CWH vm - AU 87.7 62.7 22.2 - CWH vm - AU2 76. 48..0 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - 0 45.6 - CWH vm - 9.5 63.5 334.8 - CWH vm - 43.3 8.3 60.6 - CWH vm - 89.5 64.5 53.6 - CWH vm - 95. 70. 57.2 - - AU0 54. (4.9) (0.8) - - AU 98.4 39.4 9.9 - - AU2 7.9 43.9 64.5 - - AU3 0 - - 0 0. - - 85.4 57.4 472.8 - - 0 3.4 - - 88.7 63.7 75.8 - - 82.3 57.3 8 49

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - MH mm - AU2 0 65 35.0 2.4 - MH mm - 47.0 45.2 - MH mm - 0 36.6 - MH mm - 7.0 46.0 5.6 Laredo - - AU0 0 4.0 3. Laredo - - AU 0 4.0 8.4 Laredo - - AU2 37.6 8.6.4 Laredo - - AU3 0 Laredo - - 88.7.7 6.3 Laredo - - 24. (4.9) (678.5) Laredo - - 0 2.2 Laredo - - 9 6.2 526. Laredo - - 79.4.4 67 Laredo - CWH vm - 0. Laredo - CWH vm - (.0) (.) Laredo - CWH vm - 0 4.7 Laredo - CWH vm - 80.9 55.9 22.4 Laredo - - (.0) (0.7) Laredo - - 42.2 7.2 7.9 Laredo - MH mm - (.0) (.8) Laredo - MH mm - 8.5 (6.5) (8.8) Laredo - MH wh - 0.4 (8.6) (56.8) Laredo - MH wh - 79.4.4 2.8 Laredo - MH wh - 4.7 2.7.3 Marmot - CWH wm - AU0 95.4 36.4 6.0 Marmot - CWH wm - AU (.0) (8.2) Marmot - CWH wm - AU2 63.2 (4.8) (5.6) Marmot - CWH wm - AU3 0 Marmot - CWH wm - 0 65 35.0 26.2 Marmot - CWH wm - 96.7 65 3.7 6.7 Marmot - CWH wm - 79.6 20.6.7 Marmot - CWH wm - 79.8 54.8 26.6 Marmot - CWH wm - 96.9 7.9 4222.8 Marmot - MH mm - AU2 98.6 65 33.6 2.4 Marmot - MH mm - 0 6.2 Marmot - MH mm - 0 4.0 4.4 Marmot - MH mm - 98.3 73.3 408.6 Marmot - MH mm - 89.8 64.8 3052.4 McCauley - - AU2 3.6 (.4) (4.3) McCauley - - AU3 0 McCauley - - 0 7.0 66.5 McCauley - - 26.9 (2.) (57.4) McCauley - - 97.. 8.9 McCauley - - 53.6 24.6 803.6 Monckton - - AU 0 4.0 3.2 Monckton - - AU2 3.3 (.7) (362.2) Monckton - - AU3 0 Monckton - - 9 6.3 75. Monckton - - 2 (8.8) (854.4) Monckton - - 93.8 64.8 204.5 Monckton - - 47.6 8.6 6.0 Monckton - MH wh - 0 Monckton - MH wh - 4.7 (24.3) (2.7) Monckton - MH wh - 0 2.5 Monckton - MH wh - 26.3 (2.7) (7.9) Observatory East - CWH wm - AU 0 4.0 5.7 Observatory East - CWH wm - AU2 44.7 (23.3) (4.0) Observatory East - CWH wm - AU3 0 Observatory East - CWH wm - 44.3 65 (20.7) (6.9) Observatory East - CWH wm - (.0) (8.9)

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Observatory East - CWH wm - 40.8 5.8 89.3 Observatory East - CWH wm - 49.7 24.7 606.3 Observatory East - MH mm - 0 7.9 Observatory East - MH mm - 9 65.2 955.7 Observatory West - - AU2 (.0) (6.9) Observatory West - - AU3 0 Observatory West - - 67.9 38.9 57.3 Observatory West - - 73.8 44.8 95.4 Observatory West - -.7 30.7 774.2 Observatory West - CWH wm - AU (.0) (0.6) Observatory West - CWH wm - AU2 (.0) (4.9) Observatory West - CWH wm - AU3 0 Observatory West - CWH wm -.7 65 3.7 7.8 Observatory West - CWH wm - 24.6 (0.4) (5.0) Observatory West - CWH wm - 33.6 8.6 44.2 Observatory West - MH mm - 0 8.5 Observatory West - MH mm - (.0) (2.7) Observatory West - MH mm - 67. 42. 49. Observatory West - MH wh - 79.4.4 379.5 Olh - CWH wm - AU (.0) (4.2) Olh - CWH wm - AU2 (.0) (4.8) Olh - CWH wm - AU3 0 Olh - CWH wm - 7.0 65 (48.0) (6.) Olh - CWH wm - (.0) (42.2) Olh - CWH wm - 32.2 7.2 26.6 Olh - CWH wm - 2.7 (3.3) (89.8) Olh - CWH ws 2-95.5 26 69.5 8.5 Olh - MH mm - AU2 65 (65.0) (6.6) Olh - MH mm - 0 3.9 Olh - MH mm - 7.3 46.3 7.0 Olh - MH mm - 22.7 (2.3) (44.5) Olh - MH mm 2-55.0 3.2 - - AU 0 4.0 4.0 - - AU2 85.5 56.5 2.4 - - AU3 0 - - 5.4 (23.6) (30.6) - - 77.2 48.2 4272.3 - - 99.9 70.9 84.3 - - 9.0 62.0 0.9 - MH wh - 30.4.4 8.6 - MH wh - 0.9 - MH wh - 95.4 66.4 2.4 Pearse - - AU0 94.0 35.0 8.5 Pearse - - AU 0 4.0.3 Pearse - - AU2 49.4 20.4 23.2 Pearse - - AU3 3.2 0 3.2 3.4 Pearse - - 82.5 53.5 70. Pearse - - 65.5 36.5 5655.4 Pearse - - 97.7.7 804.0 Pearse - - 79.4.4 5432.6 Pearse - MH wh - 62.8 33.8 8.2 Pearse - MH wh - 0 Pearse - MH wh - 78.2 49.2 46.4 - - AU0 (.0) (3.2) - - AU 5.3 (53.7) (22.2) - - AU2 8 5.0 542.6 - - AU3 0 - - 75.6 46.6 6.6 - - 44.5 5.5 627 - - (.0) (35.5) 5

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - -.4 (0.6) (6.5) - - 60.8 3.8 27.5 - MH wh - AU (.0) (0.) - MH wh - AU2 38.3 (.7) (2.3) - MH wh - 54.6.6 2 - MH wh - 78.8 0.8 6. - MH wh - 8 5.3 332.2 - - AU0 34.9 (24.) (2.9) - - AU 69.2 4.9 - - AU2 78.3 49.3 5.5 - - AU3 0 - - 64.4 35.4 30.9 - - 92.0 63.0 082.9 - - (.0) (26.0) - - 58.8.8 38. - - 77.3 48.3 646.4 - CWH vm - AU0 6. 36. 53.5 - CWH vm - AU.0 0. - CWH vm - AU2 47.2 9.2 7.7 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - 0 55.0 - CWH vm - 82.5 54.5 605. - CWH vm - (.0) (2) - CWH vm - 57.9 32.9 3. - CWH vm - 72.9 47.9 40.6 - - AU0 84.5.5 6. - - AU 64.8 5.8 4.9 - - AU2 49.4 2.4 5.3 - - AU3 0 - - AU4 (.0) (.2) - -.4 40.4 3.4 - - 8.4 53.4. - - 95.4 70.4 33.6 - - 78.7 53.7 357.0 - - 8.3 56.3 444.4 - MH mm - AU 0 - MH mm - AU2 48.4 65 (6.6) (2.) - MH mm - AU4 (.0) (8.7) - MH mm - 98.8 65 33.8 4.2 - MH mm - 76.5 48.5 0.5 - MH mm - 0 4.0 4. - MH mm - 76.7 5.7 54.3 - MH mm - 74.0 49.0 73.4 - MH wh - AU (.0) (9.8) - MH wh - AU2 3. (36.9) (2.4) - MH wh - 0 2.0 - MH wh - 95.0 66.0 84.9 - MH wh - 89.2 2.2 39.7 - MH wh - 63.7 34.7 243.8 - - AU 0 4.0 37. - - AU2 2 (8.8) (57.5) - - AU3 0 - - 83.5 54.5 4.3 - - 47.2 8.2 3246.9 - - 6.7 (8.3) (23.9) - - 78.9 49.9 57.2 - - 69.0 4 2455.8 - MH wh - 80.7 5.7 07.4 - MH wh - 96.2.2.7 - MH wh - 75. 46. 273.7 52

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - 0 7.0. - - 67.2 38.2 330. - - (.0) (.6) - - 98.3 69.3 45.6 - - 9.9 62.9 322. - CWH vm - AU0.9 (3.) (33.3) - CWH vm - AU 60.6 35.6 02.0 - CWH vm - AU2 37.6 9.6 3.8 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) () - CWH vm - 0 42.5 - CWH vm - 79.6 5.6 549.3 - CWH vm - (.0) (.5) - CWH vm - 66.8 4.8 49.7 - CWH vm - 47.0 482. - - AU 78.8 9.8 7. - - AU2 52.6 24.6 0. - - AU3 0 - - 0 0.6 - - 75.7 47.7 - - (.0) (22.2) - - 90.5 65.5 5.0 - - 70.7 45.7 2227.5 - MH mm - AU2 99.5 65 34.5 0.6 - MH mm - 66.5 38.5 34.6 - MH mm - 97.4 72.4 44.6 - MH mm - 58.8 33.8 - MH wh - 0 - MH wh - 85.0 56.0 83.0 - MH wh - 0.3 - MH wh - 77.2 48.2 47.6 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - (.0) (0.9) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU0 3.6 (.4) (6.5) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU 2. (2.9) (.8) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU2 8 52.2 33. Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU3 0 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - 8.7 (9.3) (6.9) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - 76.9 48.9 47.4 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - (.0) (9.2) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - 60.7 35.7 262.9 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - 8.3 56.3 207.0 Skeena Islands - - AU3 0 Skeena Islands - - 88.8 60.8 5.5 Skeena Islands - - (.0) () Skeena Islands - - 77.3 52.3 04.5 Skeena Islands - - 69.3 44.3 343.4 Skeena Islands - MH mm - 0.0 Skeena Islands - MH mm - (.0) (0.7) Skeena Islands - MH mm - 49.0 24.0 85.7 - - AU2 88.4.4.7 - - 53.8 24.8 03.2 - - 0 7.0 2.0 - - 5 2.3 97.7 - CWH vm - AU0 46.0 2.0 22.5 - CWH vm - AU 49.6 24.6 40.7 - CWH vm - AU2 88.7 60.7 0.9 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 0 8.3 - CWH vm - 0 - CWH vm - 84. 56. 000. 53

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - CWH vm - 2.5 (22.5) (36.7) - CWH vm -.7.7 34.5 - CWH vm - 76.4 5.4 960.9 - - AU0 8 2.2 5.5 - - AU 8 2.2 8.3 - - AU2 78.9.9 63.8 - - AU3 0 - - 83.9 55.9 6.3 - - (.0) (8.) - - 57. 32. 474. - - 80.6 55.6 3470.5 - MH mm - AU0 n/a - MH mm - AU n/a - MH mm - AU2 3.8 65 (33.2) (.) - MH mm - 92.7 64.7 242.8 - MH mm - (.0) (0.5) - MH mm - 72.4 47.4 26.9 - MH mm - 80.8 55.8 206.0 - MH wh - 27.7 (.3) (0.4) - MH wh - 0 0. - MH wh - 6 3.0 35.4 Sparkling - CWH vm - AU0 (.0) (.2) Sparkling - CWH vm - AU 0 79.2 Sparkling - CWH vm - AU2 99.0 7.0 27.4 Sparkling - CWH vm - AU3 0 Sparkling - CWH vm - 30.8 2.8.9 Sparkling - CWH vm - 96.6.6 05.7 Sparkling - CWH vm - 86. 6. 2. Sparkling - CWH vm - 88.3 63.3 448.0 Sparkling - CWH vm - 93.4.4 769.8 Sparkling - - AU0 90.5 3.5 6.7 Sparkling - - AU 98.2 39.2 26.8 Sparkling - - AU2 94.5 66.5 79.7 Sparkling - - 95.4 67.4 658.6 Sparkling - - 0.6 Sparkling - - 96.6 7.6 540.4 Sparkling - - 84.0.0.4 Sparkling - MH mm - AU2 0 65 35.0. Sparkling - MH mm - 88.3 6 6.8 Sparkling - MH mm - 0 64.2 Sparkling - MH mm - 76. 5. 95.4 Sparkling - MH wh - 0 7.0 0. Stagoo - CWH wm - AU0 43.7 (5.3) (24.) Stagoo - CWH wm - AU (.0) (5.0) Stagoo - CWH wm - AU2 34.6 (33.4) (82.7) Stagoo - CWH wm - AU3 5.2 0 5.2 2.3 Stagoo - CWH wm - 0 65 35.0 4.6 Stagoo - CWH wm - 0 65 35.0.4 Stagoo - CWH wm - 8 2.2 57.0 Stagoo - CWH wm - 6.0 36.0 6.0 Stagoo - CWH wm - 58.4 33.4 2496. Stagoo - CWH ws - AU2 65 (65.0) (9.) Stagoo - CWH ws - AU3 0 Stagoo - CWH ws - (.0) (8.8) Stagoo - CWH ws - 2.0 (47.0) (4.3) Stagoo - CWH ws - 27.8 60 (32.2) (30.4) Stagoo - CWH ws 2-30.8 26 4.8.3 Stagoo - MH mm - AU2.5 65 (35.5) (8.) Stagoo - MH mm - 73.5 45.5 9.0 Stagoo - MH mm - (.0) (.) 54

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Stagoo - MH mm - 56.0 3.0 97. Stagoo - MH mm - 49.3 24.3 035. Stagoo - MH mm 2-79.3 54.3 9. Stephens - - AU2 24.6 (4.4) () Stephens - - (.0) (.6) Stephens - - 56.7 27.7.0 Stephens - - 75.9 46.9 25. - - AU0 (.0) (0.6) - - AU 38.7 (2) (8.5) - - AU2 8.9 (20.) (9.7) - - AU3 0 - - 67.6 38.6 86.6 - - 35.7 6.7 09.7 - - 70.4 4.4 632.3 - - 44.9 5.9 492.5 - CWH vm - AU2 (.0) (7.2) - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (0.6) - CWH vm - 42.9 4.9 9.2 - CWH vm - 33.6 5.6 52. - CWH vm - 53.6.6 90.9 - CWH vm - 54.9.9 78.2 - - 80.4 52.4 6.9 - - 7. (0.9) (.3) - - 42.3 7.3 7.5 - -.6 3.6 7. - MH mm - 99.9 65 34.9 - MH mm - 9.0 (9.0) (3) - MH mm - 2.5 (3.5) () - MH mm - 5.0 (2) (8.2) - MH wh - AU3 0 - MH wh - 0 0.6 - MH wh - 4.2 (4.8) (84.7) - MH wh - 45.7 (22.3) (5.4) - MH wh - 9.9 (9.) (0.9) Tolmie - - AU2 (.0) (4.4) Tolmie - - AU4 63 (63.0) (3.0) Tolmie - - 0 7.0 7.5 Tolmie - - 24. (4.9) (5.9) Tolmie - - 97.9.9 5.6 Tolmie - - 0 7.0 63.4 Tolmie - MH wh - 0.5 (.5) (7.2) Tolmie - MH wh - 0 7.0 3.0 - CWH vm - AU0 69.5 44.5 7.5 - CWH vm - AU 94.3 69.3 88.8 - CWH vm - AU2 5.3 (22.7) (5.) - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (3.) - CWH vm -. 0. 0.4 - CWH vm - 64.0 36.0 66. - CWH vm - (.0) (66.0) - CWH vm - 38.6 3.6 32. - CWH vm - 65.0 4 278.2 - - AU0 (.0) (3.8) - - AU 0 4.0 - - AU2 6.3 (.7) () - - AU3 0 - - AU4 (.0) (0.9) - - 0. (7.9) (35.4) - - 52.4 24.4 439.4 55

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - (.0) (9.0) - - 3.7 6.7 82.3 - -.5 43.5 52. - MH mm - 65 (65.0) (.3) - MH mm - 54.7 26.7 65.0 - MH mm - (.0) () - MH mm - 20.8 (4.2) (3.8) - MH mm - 67.7 42.7 03.4 Trutch - - AU2.8 (7.2) (23.2) Trutch - - 22.3 (6.7) (749.5) Trutch - - 0 7.0 5.0 Trutch - - 82.6 53.6 60.9 - - AU0 (.0) (.0) - - AU 54.4 (4.6) (7.7) - - AU2 46.2 7.2 496.2 - - AU3 0 - - 55.6 26.6 66.2 - - 67.9 38.9 634.0 - - (.0) (3.2) - - 49.5 20.5 6.8 - - 77.7 48.7 23.4 - MH wh - AU2 75.6 7.6 5.2 - MH wh - AU3 0 - MH wh - 0 0. - MH wh - 73.7 44.7 4.5 - MH wh - 84.8 6.8 7.3 - MH wh - 82.8 53.8 706. - - AU 9.9 (39.) (26.3) - - AU2 96.2 67.2 80.7 - - AU3 0 - - 60.8 3.8 30.5 - - 77.2 48.2 2456. - - (.0) (3.5) - - 46.5 7.5.8 - -.7 39.7 746.7 - CWH vm - AU0 0 44.0 - CWH vm - AU 46.5 2.5 - CWH vm - AU2 54.6 26.6 26.8 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - 0.6 - CWH vm - 84.5 56.5 475.9 - CWH vm - 69.8 44.8.5 - CWH vm - 84.8.8 407.7 - - AU0 0 4.0 - - AU 48.4 (0.6) (4.0) - - AU2 5.4 23.4.2 - - AU3 0 - - 0 0.5 - - 82.2 54.2 499.3 - - (.0) (0.) - - 99. 74. 23.5 - - 75.6.6 934.2 - MH mm - AU2 0 65 35.0 0.7 - MH mm - 73.0 45.0 87.7 - MH mm - (.0) (4.) - MH mm - 0.5 - MH mm -. 34. 435.4 - MH wh - AU 0 4.0.6 - MH wh - AU2 38.2 (.8) (2.7) - MH wh - 5 2.0 32.6 56

Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - MH wh - 0.2 - MH wh - 58.0.0 389.4 - - AU0 (.0) (3.) - - AU 36.6 (22.4) (2.7) - - AU2 9.4 (9.6) (3.9) - - AU3 0 - - 80.8 5.8 26.7 - - 30.6.6 43.8 - - (.0) (2.0) - - 67. 38. 249. - - 30.5.5 0.9 - CWH vm - AU0 23. (.9) (.8) - CWH vm - AU 76.0 5.0 26.4 - CWH vm - AU2 77.8 49.8 4. - CWH vm - AU3 0.8 0 0.8.7 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (7.7) - CWH vm - 76.8 48.8 7.2 - CWH vm - 32.7 4.7 74.8 - CWH vm - (.0) (57.0) - CWH vm - 52.0 27.0 052.7 - CWH vm - 34.0 9.0 77.7 - - AU 32.9 (26.) (.3) - - AU2 2.8 (.2) (0.4) - - AU3 0 - - 98.2 7 2.7 - - 5.5 (2.5) (353.9) - - (.0) (0.) - - 7.9 46.9 4.9 - - 2 (4.8) (9.6) - MH mm - AU3 0 - MH mm - 2.8 (.2) (344.7) - MH mm -.3 43.3 0.4 - MH mm - 9.7 (5.3) (8.0) - MH wh - AU2 0 0. - MH wh - 0.9 - MH wh - 5.6 (23.4) (57.8) - MH wh - 73.5 5.5 0.5 - MH wh - 3.8 (5.2) (55.2) 3..2 Seral Stage information for Licencee s that overlap with Landscape s Tables specific to each licencee are supplied in Appendix C. These tables will allow licencees to evaluate their achievement of proportional targets. The table formats are similar to those above in section 3... 57

3.2 Ecosystem-Based Management (Central and North Coast Order) The Central and North Coast Order sets objectives for the implementation of ecosystembased management on the North Coast. This project provides data that can be used in measuring consistency with some of these objectives: important fisheries watersheds, upland streams, landscape level biodiversity, and critical grizzly bear habitat. Landscape level biodiversity is addressed in the seral stage analysis describe in Section 3. above, and the following sections discuss important fisheries watersheds, upland streams, and critical grizzly bear habitat. 3.2. Important Fisheries Watersheds The CNCO describes an objective that limits theamount of equivalent clearcut area (ECA) that may exist in areas identified as important fisheries watersheds. The data set that has been prepared for this project can also be used to determine consistency with this target. Calculation of equivalent clearcut area is based on a defined process, in which ECA is determined by evaluating the amount of hydrologically effective green-up (HEG). This project does not attempt to carry out the full ECA calculation; instead, a coarse filter approach is used to determine if a fisheries sensitive watershed is approaching the threshold where a full and detailed ECA calculation would be necessary. As a coarse filter we use a conservative surrogate definition for when hydrologically effective green-up is achieved: forests that are in the old, mature, mid-seral, and young age classes (i.e. forests that are > years old). See Appendix A for information related to how surogate hydrologicaly effective green-up (SHEG) is calculated. Within important fisheries watersheds, if the area of forest that meets the SHEG definition is greater than 80% of the total forested area in that fisheries watershed, then it can be stated that the watershed is consistent with the target in the CNCO. Areas that are below 80% are red-flagged as needing further evaluation to determine their true ECA. Table 5 shows that of the 3 Important Fisheries Watersheds within the North Coast TSA, there is only one identified as requiring further analysis about the state of hydrologically effective green-up. Watershed Assessment Guidebook, 999 58

Table 5: Important Fisheries Watershedoutcomes for coarse-filter hydrological green-up outcomes Target: Greater than 80% of forested area is hydrologically greened-up. Important Fisheries Watershed** Total ed Area 2006 SHEG* area 2006 % at SHEG* 2006 Redflag 20 SHEG* area 20 % at SHEG* 20 Redflag 6 48.6 48.6 00% 48.6 00% 9 200. 200. 00% 200. 00% 20.9 2024.7 00% 2024.7 00% 5 00% 00% 6 23.3 22.2 00% 22.4 00% 7 340.5 88.7 89% 0.8 79% 8 5699.6 52.6 98% 52.6 98% 9 348. 348. 00% 348. 00% 20 49.9 084.0 94% 020. 89% 2 989.9 94.2 95% 94.2 95% 22 2205.7 2204.7 00% 2204.7 00% 23 637.6 633.0 00% 633.0 00% 36.4 0769.8 82% 0769.8 82% 26 485.6 4062.8 84% 4062.8 84% 27 8.2.3 97% 49.3 97% 33.0 33.0 00% 33.0 00% 46.9 347.8 83% 347.8 83% 30 95.5 95.5 00% 95.5 00% 83 8323.0 8320.5 00% 8320.5 00% 87 45.8 45.8 00% 45.8 00% 90 8664.9 8639.0 00% 864 00% 9 09.4 09.4 00% 09.4 00% 92 308.7 302.2 00% 302.2 00% 93 867.0 7887.5 97% 790 97% 94 976.9 944.2 97% 944.8 97% 95 45.3 403.3 99% 407.9 99% 96 478.7 478.7 00% 478.7 00% 98 84.7 74.3 88% 74.3 88% 3 399.9 77.2 84% 78.9 84% 4 2375.5 2363.5 99% 2364.7 00% 5 8.5 8.5 00% 8.5 00% * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** See Key Map (next page) for names and locations of watersheds

60

3.2.2 Upland Streams The CNCO describes in the objective for upland streams a target for functioning upland forest within a watershed. The data set that has been prepared for this project can also be used to determine consistency with this target. Functioning upland forest includes forest that is on slopes >5% that is in a state of hydrological green-up. For the purposes of this report, we use a conservative, coarse filter approach for the definition of hydrological green-up, and assume it is achieved for forests that are in the old, mature, and mid-seral age classes (i.e. forests that are > 40 years old). Watersheds are delineated using the :,000 watershed atlas 2. The Atlas database includes over 870 residual watersheds with areas of les than ha: these are likely a result of poor polygon unioning, and therefore are not report on in this report. Tables 6a 6m show the results for upland streams for watersheds within specific watershed groups. Of the 700 watersheds reported on in these tables, only 8 pass are indicated as requiring further analysis regarding hydrologically effective green-up of the upland forest area. Table 6a: Amount of Functioning Riparian KEEC watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Map ID ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KEEC Group KEECWSD000003 23 799.0 774.4 774.4 00% 774.4 00% KEECWSD000004 695 692. 647.6 647.6 00% 647.6 00% KEECWSD000005 405 254.5 964.3 964.3 00% 964.3 00% KEECWSD000008 63 47.6 40.9 40.9 00% 40.9 00% KEECWSD000009 3 099.4 95.8 95.8 00% 95.8 00% KEECWSD00002 348 48.6 4.9 4.9 00% 4.9 00% KEECWSD00003 24 348.6 33 33 00% 33 00% KEECWSD00004 5430 9. 76.5 76.5 00% 76.5 00% KEECWSD00009 93 237. 084. 084. 00% 084. 00% KEECWSD00002 458 9477.5 9083.7 9054.9 00% 9056. 00% KEECWSD000023 25 98.8 2440.8 2440.8 00% 2440.8 00% KEECWSD0000 656 384.0 337.8 337.8 00% 337.8 00% KEECWSD0000 557 2308.5 982.5 982.5 00% 982.5 00% KEECWSD000030 26 836.3 767. 767. 00% 767. 00% KEECWSD000032 4 939.5 844.4 844.4 00% 844.4 00% KEECWSD000033 465 38.5 03.7 03.7 00% 03.7 00% KEECWSD000039 562 24.8 2.6 2.6 00% 2.6 00% KEECWSD000049 652 97.9 869.5 869.5 00% 869.5 00% KEECWSD000057 700 73.0 027.9 027.9 00% 027.9 00% KEECWSD0000 349 4.8 467.6 467.6 00% 467.6 00% KEECWSD000072 466 27.0.8.8 00%.8 00% KEECWSD000085 92 842. 642.3 642.3 00% 642.3 00% KEECWSD000092 65 327.4 6.5 6.5 00% 6.5 00% KEECWSD0007 605 038.7 857.8 857.8 00% 857.8 00% KEECWSD000 27 3. 982. 982. 00% 982. 00% KEECWSD00044 457 204. 086.3 085.4 00% 085.4 00% KEECWSD00055 49 347.9 8.6 8.6 00% 8.6 00% KEECWSD00056 398 377.6 35. 35. 00% 35. 00% 20 UF Redflag 2 Choice of :,000 watershed atlas for watershed definition is based on direction provided at a February, 2008 videoconference with Regional and District MoFR staff 6

Key Map ID # Total ed Area Upland (UF) Area 2006 SHEG* area in UF 2006 % of UF at SHEG* 2006 UF Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KEEC Group KEECWSD00057 220 537.7 387.3 387.3 00% 387.3 00% KEECWSD00058 39. 978.7 978.7 00% 978.7 00% KEECWSD000 563 03.9 806.4 806.4 00% 806.4 00% KEECWSD00060 456 3033. 2787.3 2782.7 00% 2782.9 00% KEECWSD00064 696 695.2 537.4 537.4 00% 537.4 00% KEECWSD00067 584.7 480.7 480.7 00% 480.7 00% KEECWSD00072 93 77.4 63.2 63.2 00% 63.2 00% KEECWSD00074 487 857.4 690. 690. 00% 690. 00% KEECWSD00077 89 5.9 42 42 00% 42 00% KEECWSD00079 604 5242.7 326.2 326.2 00% 326.2 00% KEECWSD00087 46 37. 00% 00% KEECWSD00090 90 2.2 220.5 220. 00% 220. 00% KEECWSD00022 948 7.4 46.7 46.7 00% 46.7 00% KEECWSD000226 87 908.2 9.7 9.7 00% 9.7 00% KEECWSD0002 5474 26.9 22. 22. 00% 22. 00% KEECWSD000232 3830 38.0 22.6 22.6 00% 22.6 00% KEECWSD000348 9 988.9 774.9 7.2 00% 7.2 00% KEECWSD000349 88 438.8 394.2 394.2 00% 394.2 00% KEECWSD000352 987 32.5 3.3 3.3 00% 3.3 00% KEECWSD000365 86 5549.9 487.9 487.9 00% 487.9 00% KEECWSD000378 309 0.8 82.4 82.4 00% 82.4 00% KEECWSD000400 3848 24.2 24.2 00% 24.2 00% KEECWSD000430 84 65.6.4.4 00% 3.7 00% KEECWSD000475 7233 42.7 22.8 22.8 00% 22.8 00% KEECWSD0007 7244 446.2 388.9 382. 98% 382. 98% KEECWSD0005 3863 26.2 58.2 58.2 00% 58.2 00% KEECWSD000526 85 97.0 788.6 788.6 00% 788.6 00% KEECWSD000546 46 52.3 36.9 36.9 00% 36.9 00% KEECWSD000554 397 373.5 276.8 276.8 00% 276.8 00% KEECWSD000586 34 277.0 733.7 733.7 00% 733.7 00% KEECWSD0006 694 3323.8 6. 6. 00% 6. 00% KEECWSD000670 3882 44.7 44.7 00% 44.7 00% KEECWSD000740 389 40.6 26.6 26.6 00% 26.6 00% * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag 62

Table 6b: Amount of Functioning Riparian KHTZ watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Map ID ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* 20 UF Redflag Watershed** KHTZ Group KHTZWSD00006 24 8533.3 84 8067.6 96% 7958.8 94% KHTZWSD00009 409 8.9 779.2 7.4 95% 665.8 94% KHTZWSD000023 245 235.7 230.5 224.3 97% 202.9 88% KHTZWSD0000 697 9.9 92.4 92.4 00% 92.4 00% KHTZWSD000026 53 35.9 3095.3 897.4 9% 586.6 88% KHTZWSD000027 246 493. 487.8 487.8 00% 466.6 96% KHTZWSD0000 240 2.6 23.0 389.2 92% 27.6 9% KHTZWSD0000 538 5.3.8 49.2 % 49.2 % KHTZWSD000030 624 22.7 26.5 2364.0 84% 2377.7 84% KHTZWSD000032 309 239.7 27.9 735.7 82% 735.8 82% KHTZWSD000033 55. 675.8 6.5 90%.0 9% KHTZWSD000034 54 39.4 06 789.6 74% 79 75% KHTZWSD000040 56 5527.5 539.8 4403. 83% 4479.7 84% KHTZWSD000043 57 2099.7 985.9 893.3 95% 800.8 9% KHTZWSD000044 58 57.0 570. 570. 00% 554.6 97% KHTZWSD000046 52 3800.5 36.9 33.0 93% 3220. 89% KHTZWSD0000 572 85.2 49.7 022.4 89% 896.5 78% KHTZWSD000054 5 62.2 6..4 99%.6 99% KHTZWSD000060 5 32.3 3 4.9 99% 5.2 99% * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas Table 6c: Amount of Functioning Riparian KITR watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Map ID ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* 20 UF Redflag Watershed** KITR Group KITRWSD00030 69 47.9 47.9 47.9 00% 47.9 00% KITRWSD0003 432 4673.7 4526.8 3834.6 85% 3834.6 85% KITRWSD00033 72 3.8 44.0 44.0 00% 44.0 00% KITRWSD00040 7 73.7 698.2 698.2 00% 698.2 00% KITRWSD0004 670 5.6 524.5 524.5 00% 524.5 00% KITRWSD00042 632 72.7 70.8 70.8 00% 70.8 00% KITRWSD00043 33 7. 274.6 274.6 00% 274.6 00% KITRWSD00044 70 249.7 249.7 24 96% 24 96% KITRWSD00045 522 54.7 54. 54. 00% 54. 00% KITRWSD00046 73 483.9 483.6 373.5 77% 373.5 77% KITRWSD00047 74 55. 549.2 536. 98% 536. 98% KITRWSD00048 633 45.0 449.8 263.6 % 263.6 % * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 63

Table 6d: Amount of Functioning Riparian KSHR watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Map ID ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KSHR Group KSHRWSD00007 485 208.6 206.8 99.6 96% 99.6 96% KSHRWSD00002 40 89.5 74.9 74.9 00% 74.9 00% KSHRWSD000023 39 978. 962.6 8.2 90% 8.2 90% KSHRWSD000024 38 4356.4 437.9 4304.7 00% 4304.7 00% KSHRWSD0000 640 004.2 957.3 954.0 00% 954.0 00% KSHRWSD000026 4 2470.9 2.4 2099.6 99% 2099.6 99% KSHRWSD000027 538 3.8 243.2 239.0 00% 239.0 00% KSHRWSD0000 37 2 06.6 06.6 00% 06.6 00% KSHRWSD0000 439 4353. 3775.6 302.0 95% 3026. 95% KSHRWSD000030 384 2726.4 2707.3 270 00% 270 00% KSHRWSD00003 484 48.6 48.3 47.4 00% 47.4 00% KSHRWSD000032 38 539.5 527.7 527.7 00% 527.7 00% KSHRWSD000033 22 776.0 744.0 739.0 00% 739.0 00% KSHRWSD000034 23 384.4 370.4 3.2 99% 3.2 99% KSHRWSD000035 533 82.9 8.0 8.0 00% 8.0 00% KSHRWSD000036 36 620.9 69.2 67.5 00% 67.5 00% KSHRWSD000037 8.2 209.6 209.6 00% 209.6 00% KSHRWSD000038 70 26.7 26.3.2 99%.2 99% KSHRWSD000039 532 548.5 54 54 00% 54 00% KSHRWSD000040 537 2.9 24.4 24.9 93% 24.9 93% KSHRWSD00004 380 389.4 386.0 348.5 90% 348.5 90% KSHRWSD000042 64 02.5 009.0 002. 99% 002. 99% KSHRWSD000043 2 5.2 5.5 496.7 98% 496.7 98% KSHRWSD000044 6 4062.3 3976.8 3973.3 00% 3973.3 00% KSHRWSD000045 35 449.2 426.4 4026.6 98% 4026.6 98% KSHRWSD000046 58.9 03. 2733.4 94% 2736.5 94% KSHRWSD000048 9 92.9 89 862.6 99% 862.6 99% KSHRWSD000049 24 4584.5 452.7 44.3 98% 4434.7 98% KSHRWSD000056 26 85.3 847.9 808.2 95% 808.2 95% KSHRWSD000057 7 9.6 5.5 540.4 9% 540.4 9% KSHRWSD0000 638 5305. 5203.4 5200. 00% 5200. 00% KSHRWSD000060 483 37.9 3097.6.0 96%.0 96% KSHRWSD00006 639 5230.9 0.6 4936.5 95% 4937.8 95% KSHRWSD000062 20 073.6 070.4 049.9 98% 049.9 98% KSHRWSD000063 53 798.7 736.6 735.7 00% 735.7 00% KSHRWSD000064 60 300..0.0 00%.0 00% KSHRWSD000066 700.8 695.3.7 98% 7.4 99% KSHRWSD000067 34 62.8 36.9 038.0 9% 048.0 92% KSHRWSD0000 677 6.6 4.8 4.8 00% 4.8 00% KSHRWSD000069 5720 326.0 306.6 8.2 97% 8.2 97% KSHRWSD00007 484 34.9 00% 00% KSHRWSD000074 3 056.9 975.4 955. 98% 955.4 98% KSHRWSD000077 4843 226.7 2.5 2.5 00% 2.5 00% KSHRWSD000078 324 2200.4 248.2 244.4 00% 244.4 00% KSHRWSD000085 326 435.3 434.3 4.6 98% 4.6 98% KSHRWSD000088 4 25.5 24.9 207.6 99% 207.6 99% KSHRWSD000089 637 224.6 99.3 97.2 00% 97.2 00% KSHRWSD000090 73.4 47.4 43. 97% 43. 97% KSHRWSD00009 5 05.8 002.5 0 00% 002.4 00% KSHRWSD000094 323 2770.4 2749.4 2734.4 99% 2734.4 99% KSHRWSD000095 530 79.7 64.7 63.6 00% 63.6 00% KSHRWSD000097 27 49.4 48.3 45.6 98% 45.6 98% KSHRWSD000098 30 22.8 2447.5 226.0 9% 226.7 9% KSHRWSD00005 536 5.3 2.6.6 00%.6 00% KSHRWSD00007 379 383.5 356.7 354. 00% 354. 00% KSHRWSD00008 534 327.0 36.5 5. 93% 3. 98% KSHRWSD0008 4847 24 235.3 235.3 00% 235.3 00% 20 UF Redflag 64

Key Map ID # Total ed Area Upland (UF) Area 2006 SHEG* area in UF 2006 % of UF at SHEG* 2006 UF Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KSHR Group KSHRWSD00020 3 4.0 422.2 385.0 9% 387.5 92% KSHRWSD00024 3235 5. 4.9 4.9 00% 4.9 00% KSHRWSD000 66 267.4 267.2 266.7 00% 266.7 00% KSHRWSD000 3 2457. 2400.5 2397. 00% 2397. 00% KSHRWSD00030 33 892.2 887.3 886.2 00% 886.2 00% KSHRWSD0003 5 98.5 9.8 9.8 00% 9.8 00% KSHRWSD00032 383 766.2 748.5 695.7 97% 695.7 97% KSHRWSD00033 5 70. 2783.8 2772.6 00% 2772.6 00% KSHRWSD00034 600 9909.0 97.0 96.7 00% 965.3 00% KSHRWSD00035 3064.5 67.8 5.5 99% 5.5 99% KSHRWSD00036 602 3708.4 3662.6 3662.6 00% 3662.6 00% KSHRWSD00038 382 2226.8 265.9 227.9 98% 227.9 98% KSHRWSD00039 535 49.3 4034.2 3940. 99% 3940. 99% KSHRWSD00040 2 2606.7 03.7 2483.2 99% 2483.2 99% KSHRWSD0004 32 897.5 833.0 832.6 00% 832.6 00% KSHRWSD00043 3 98.6 969.0 969.0 00% 969.0 00% * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag Table 6e: Amount of Functioning Riparian KTSU watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Map ID ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KTSU Group KTSUWSD000004 83 389.3 940.7 940.7 00% 940.7 00% KTSUWSD00002 6448 45.7 7.4 7.4 00% 7.4 00% KTSUWSD0000 55 802.6 665.4 665.4 00% 665.4 00% KTSUWSD000026 388 54.8 442.0 442.0 00% 442.0 00% KTSUWSD0000 545 55.5 2275.8 22.2 99% 22.2 99% KTSUWSD0000 445 737.9 4.9 4.9 00% 4.9 00% KTSUWSD000054 8 26. 5.6 5.6 00% 5.6 00% KTSUWSD0000 2200 07.4 67.9 67.9 00% 67.9 00% KTSUWSD00007 0 357.8 5.5 5.5 00% 5.5 00% KTSUWSD0009 57 30..5.5 00%.5 00% KTSUWSD00026 444 846.9 46.0 46.0 00% 46.0 00% KTSUWSD00038 642 09.6 95.7 95.7 00% 95.7 00% KTSUWSD00065 2223 35.4.9 24.2 94% 24.2 94% KTSUWSD00070 5608 43.0 33.7 33.7 00% 33.7 00% KTSUWSD0008 54 8.3 92.4 92.4 00% 92.4 00% KTSUWSD00090 53 40.4 00% 00% KTSUWSD00095 546 238.0 5.3 5.3 00% 5.3 00% KTSUWSD000206 330 662.9 48 479.9 00% 479.9 00% KTSUWSD000209 52 9.7 273.2 269.6 99% 269.6 99% KTSUWSD0002 690 957.3 553.0 542. 98% 542. 98% KTSUWSD000224 7347 39.0 7.5 7.5 00% 7.5 00% KTSUWSD000235 443 564.7 57 538.3 94% 538.3 94% KTSUWSD000237 5 996.8 083.0 083.0 00% 083.0 00% KTSUWSD000244 643 862.4 344.3 336.9 99% 336.9 99% KTSUWSD000 343 78.3 64.0 63.6 99% 63.6 99% KTSUWSD00030 387 372.5 00.9 00.9 00% 00.9 00% KTSUWSD00037 547 220. 98.5 98.5 00% 98.5 00% KTSUWSD000372 63 008.6 886.3 886.3 00% 886.3 00% KTSUWSD000382 48 494.0 994.5 994.5 00% 994.5 00% KTSUWSD000383 389 48.0 33. 33. 00% 33. 00% 20 UF Redflag 65

Key Map ID # Total ed Area Upland (UF) Area 2006 SHEG* area in UF 2006 % of UF at SHEG* 2006 UF Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KTSU Group KTSUWSD000390 3.2 26.5 26.5 00% 26.5 00% KTSUWSD000405 49 747.9 207.3 207.3 00% 207.3 00% KTSUWSD000408 678 7.3 6.8 6.8 00% 6.8 00% KTSUWSD000409 57 373.9 333.5 333.5 00% 333.5 00% KTSUWSD00040 45 6.8 085.0 085.0 00% 085.0 00% KTSUWSD00042 446 202.5 34.2 34.2 00% 34.2 00% KTSUWSD00042 56 498.6 360.7 360.7 00% 360.7 00% KTSUWSD0004 3 78.0 588.0 588.0 00% 588.0 00% KTSUWSD000439 3 238.3 96.8 96.8 00% 96.8 00% KTSUWSD000454 544 347.7 30. 30. 00% 30. 00% KTSUWSD000456 47 876.9 73. 73. 00% 73. 00% KTSUWSD000477 440 2.9 92.9 92.9 00% 92.9 00% KTSUWSD000478 327 539.0 45.8 45.8 00% 45.8 00% KTSUWSD000483 442 466.8 353.2 353.2 00% 353.2 00% KTSUWSD000490 44 536.9 320. 320. 00% 320. 00% KTSUWSD000 386 55.4 55.4 55.4 00% 55.4 00% KTSUWSD00053 380 26.9 2.9 2.9 00% 2.9 00% KTSUWSD000520 5 49.9 49.9 49.9 00% 49.9 00% KTSUWSD000522 5666 66.0 47.9 47.9 00% 47.9 00% KTSUWSD000524 62 902.9 526.7 526.7 00% 526.7 00% KTSUWSD00053 543 85.6 85.3 85.3 00% 85.3 00% KTSUWSD000532 56 66.6 42.8 42.8 00% 42.8 00% KTSUWSD000543 548 444.7 49. 49. 00% 49. 00% KTSUWSD000545 7426 777. 556.3 556.3 00% 556.3 00% KTSUWSD000547 549 0. 249.7 249.7 00% 249.7 00% KTSUWSD000564 386 62.5 34.7 33.4 97% 34.5 00% KTSUWSD00057 44 224.5 224.5 224.5 00% 224.5 00% KTSUWSD0008 540 742.9 76. 76. 00% 76. 00% KTSUWSD000607 46 88.2 92.3 92.3 00% 92.3 00% KTSUWSD00065 43 08.8 08.6 08.6 00% 08.6 00% KTSUWSD000624 4003 5 30.6 30.6 00% 30.6 00% KTSUWSD000653 5676 40.9.3.3 00%.3 00% KTSUWSD000655 390 5.3.5.5 00%.5 00% KTSUWSD000677 482 78.6 39.6 39.6 00% 39.6 00% KTSUWSD0005 58 00.5 00.4 00.4 00% 00.4 00% KTSUWSD000775 644 3.6 320.8 320.8 00% 320.8 00% KTSUWSD00080 7404 3 8.0 8.0 00% 8.0 00% KTSUWSD000854 542 585.6 48.6 48.6 00% 48.6 00% KTSUWSD000872 54 263.9 80. 80. 00% 80. 00% KTSUWSD000946 745 55.8 49.2 49.2 00% 49.2 00% KTSUWSD00060 578.4.3.3 00%.3 00% * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag 66

Table 6f: Amount of Functioning Riparian KUMR watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Map ID ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KUMR Group KUMRWSD000002 3.0 05.8 05.8 00% 05.8 00% KUMRWSD000003 58 2.8 6 6 00% 6 00% KUMRWSD000004 82 2754.5 84.2 3.4 98% 66.2 99% KUMRWSD000005 7 65.7 55. 4580.8 83% 4580.8 83% KUMRWSD000006 436 556.3 445.4 88.4 82% 230.4 85% KUMRWSD000007 36 70. 2639.3 2.2 83% 2.2 83% KUMRWSD000009 603 5.3 97.8 97.8 00% 97.8 00% KUMRWSD00008 2673 20.5 83.0 82.5 00% 82.5 00% KUMRWSD0000 2 65.0 2.0 2477.0 99% 2477.0 99% KUMRWSD000026 67 2445.8 2420.8 273.7 90% 273.7 90% KUMRWSD000032 565 643.3 63.6 63.2 00% 63.2 00% KUMRWSD000036 23 43 422.8 422.8 00% 422.8 00% KUMRWSD000037 230 56.2.0.0 00%.0 00% KUMRWSD000038 57 0544.6 0378.9 984.6 88% 984.9 88% KUMRWSD00004 35 2032.6 973.2 972.8 00% 972.8 00% KUMRWSD000053 6 244. 247. 2392.8 99% 239 99% KUMRWSD000062 94 35.3.7.7 00%.7 00% KUMRWSD000063 660 979.8 9.0 9.0 00% 9.0 00% KUMRWSD000064 234 242. 235.4 235.4 00% 235.4 00% KUMRWSD0000 232 896.3 885.7 885.3 00% 885.3 00% KUMRWSD000070 233 0.8 039.8 039.8 00% 039.8 00% KUMRWSD000076 226 22.4 275.2 2749.9 00% 2664.8 97% KUMRWSD000078 3 3.9 2.5.2 97% 20.5 94% KUMRWSD000080 566 337.2 84.3 83.6 00% 83.6 00% KUMRWSD000084 2 275.6 273.7 273.7 00% 273.7 00% KUMRWSD000089 235 288.8 22367.2 2267.0 99% 2226.9 99% KUMRWSD000090 370 7372.8 6475.3 647.0 99% 647.0 99% KUMRWSD00009 264 52.5 4837.2 4833.8 00% 4833.8 00% KUMRWSD000095 227 405. 375.8 375.8 00% 306.7 95% KUMRWSD000099 266 55.9 996.6 996.4 00% 996.4 00% KUMRWSD00002 2 454.0 408.4 405.7 00% 405.7 00% KUMRWSD00009 608 7.4 708.4 708.3 00% 708.3 00% KUMRWSD0000 224 66.5 30.4.3 99%.3 99% KUMRWSD00039 490 207.2 9.3 9.3 00% 9.3 00% KUMRWSD00049 658 964.5 942.6 94.9 00% 94.9 00% KUMRWSD0006 8 5.9 498. 498. 00% 498. 00% KUMRWSD00062 263 674.4 575.7 575.7 00% 575.7 00% KUMRWSD00063 675 542.8 4.0 4.0 00% 4.0 00% KUMRWSD00075 262 063.0 804.2 804.2 00% 804.2 00% KUMRWSD00093 620 779.0 47.9 47.9 00% 47.9 00% KUMRWSD00095 4 222.4 2094.6 2093.7 00% 2093.7 00% KUMRWSD00099 408 27.7 2.8 226.7 00% 226.7 00% KUMRWSD000209 35 8.3 563.6 563.6 00% 563.6 00% KUMRWSD0002 8 340.8 27.2 27.2 00% 27.3 00% KUMRWSD000244 578 060. 875.3 875.3 00% 875.3 00% KUMRWSD000249 609 454.6 3.0 3.0 00% 3.0 00% KUMRWSD0003 47 789.9 604.5 604.5 00% 604.5 00% KUMRWSD0009 40 3. 0.7 0.7 00% 0.7 00% KUMRWSD00026 579 326..7.7 00%.7 00% KUMRWSD000262 3603 36.9 36.8 36.8 00% 36.8 00% KUMRWSD000266 6 830.4 553.4 553.4 00% 553.4 00% KUMRWSD000272 34 793.3 770.4 678.7 88% 678.7 88% KUMRWSD000279 260 435.5 353.7 353.7 00% 353.7 00% KUMRWSD000 26 24.5 9.6 9.6 00% 9.6 00% KUMRWSD0003 478 584.0 52. 5677.5 00% 53.3 89% KUMRWSD0005 407 805.5 776.4 776.4 00% 776.4 00% KUMRWSD0007 80 87.4 49.8 4949.7 00% 4706.7 95% 20 UF Redflag 67

Key Map ID # Total ed Area Upland (UF) Area 2006 SHEG* area in UF 2006 % of UF at SHEG* 2006 UF Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KUMR Group KUMRWSD0009 356 9.2 55.8 55.8 00% 55.8 00% KUMRWSD0000 663 72.9 27.5 27.5 00% 27.5 00% KUMRWSD000 664 7.8 477.6 458.3 96% 458.3 96% KUMRWSD0005 223 855.0 832.8 8.2 97% 8.2 97% KUMRWSD0007 9 76.0 64.7 64.7 00% 64.7 00% KUMRWSD0008 698 820.9 703.8 703.8 00% 703.8 00% KUMRWSD000304 7 82.5 64.5 64.5 00% 64.5 00% KUMRWSD000306 470 77 673.9 673.9 00% 673.9 00% KUMRWSD00034 5 70.7 4 4 00% 4 00% KUMRWSD00035 265 358.9 7. 7. 00% 7. 00% KUMRWSD00039 357 276.2 0 0 00% 0 00% KUMRWSD000324 6 4849.9 47.8 449.9 95% 4492.3 95% KUMRWSD000326 362 36.0 3.7 3.7 00% 3.7 00% KUMRWSD000327 3 534.6 462.7 462.7 00% 462.7 00% KUMRWSD000335 4 65.2 35.2 35.2 00% 35.2 00% KUMRWSD000338 355 376.2 305.6 305.6 00% 305.6 00% KUMRWSD00034 564 540. 5 5 00% 5 00% KUMRWSD000343 222 0.7 086.9 086.4 00% 086.4 00% KUMRWSD000345 2. 244.3 244.3 00% 244.3 00% KUMRWSD000346 2 69.4 44.0 44.0 00% 44.0 00% KUMRWSD000349 577 338.6 94.8 94.8 00% 94.8 00% KUMRWSD000353 249 422.3 32.6 32.6 00% 32.6 00% KUMRWSD000356 4 74.5 655.3 655.3 00% 655.3 00% KUMRWSD000360 4449 27.8.3.3 00%.3 00% KUMRWSD000364 75 970.7 98.3 98.3 00% 98.3 00% KUMRWSD000379 79 7744.5 7465.7 79.3 97% 7376.9 99% KUMRWSD000390 674 436.9 402.6 402.6 00% 402.6 00% KUMRWSD000395 0 25.7 93.8 93.8 00% 93.8 00% KUMRWSD0004 690 79.2 70.5 70.5 00% 70.5 00% KUMRWSD00042 66 3374.7 3278.3 3276.7 00% 80.9 9% KUMRWSD00046 665 96.4 7.4 7.4 00% 7.4 00% KUMRWSD000442 433 3876.7 3740. 358.6 96% 358.6 96% KUMRWSD000452 247 52. 46. 46. 00% 46. 00% KUMRWSD000455 7037 34.7 3.5 3.5 00% 3.5 00% KUMRWSD000494 576 2.0 94.9 94.9 00% 94.9 00% KUMRWSD0006 469 73.8 23.0 2 00% 24.7 97% KUMRWSD00052 248 52. 47.4 47.4 00% 47.4 00% KUMRWSD00053 354 247.5 235.6 235.6 00% 235.6 00% KUMRWSD0005 435 2023. 988.2 866.4 94% 867.6 94% KUMRWSD000533 78 86. 85 769.5 96% 809.8 98% KUMRWSD000547 65 234.7 23.9 23.9 00% 23.9 00% KUMRWSD00055 467 4745.8 4620.5 469.2 00% 469.2 00% KUMRWSD000557 662 3866.6 3582.0 3582.0 00% 3582.0 00% KUMRWSD000652 657 347.4 3369. 3346. 99% 3346. 99% KUMRWSD000666 236 2 2097.7 2095. 00% 2095. 00% KUMRWSD000676 477 2758.8 95.0 93.7 00% 93.7 00% KUMRWSD000 406 369. 356.0 0.8 95% 0.8 95% KUMRWSD0004 9 32. 32.9 326.0 00% 3223.3 00% KUMRWSD0005 237 876.2 82.7 82.7 00% 82.7 00% KUMRWSD00074 567 3462.9 3393.2 3357.9 99% 3357.9 99% KUMRWSD000745 479 22655.2 22005.7 56. 00% 56. 00% KUMRWSD000753 434 430. 352.3 336.4 99% 346.3 00% KUMRWSD000754 37 63.9 63.5 63.5 00% 63.5 00% KUMRWSD000758 352 84.5 752.6 744.9 00% 744.9 00% KUMRWSD00076 76 39.5 2. 2. 00% 2. 00% KUMRWSD000762 77 43.2 36.0 36.0 00% 36.0 00% KUMRWSD000763 56 775.5 699.0 698.9 00% 698.9 00% KUMRWSD0007 238 2636.6 60.8 52.6 00% 55. 00% KUMRWSD000769 353 352.7 5.6 3.5 00% 5.2 00% KUMRWSD000770 239 44.6 46.4 408. 96% 408. 96% KUMRWSD00078 570 953.6 903.8 903.6 00% 903.6 00% 20 UF Redflag

Key Map ID # Total ed Area Upland (UF) Area 2006 SHEG* area in UF 2006 % of UF at SHEG* 2006 UF Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KUMR Group KUMRWSD000787 5 3204.6 3.0 3002.8 96% 3002.8 96% KUMRWSD000798 22 4. 396.7 396.7 00% 396.7 00% KUMRWSD0008 57 552.3 522.5 54.7 99% 54.7 99% KUMRWSD000888 569 804.7 738.9 738.9 00% 738.9 00% * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag Table 6g: Amount of Functioning Riparian LNAR watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Map ID ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** LNAR Group LNARWSD00000 4 7300.8 760. 705.5 98% 6522. 9% LNARWSD0000 30 95.0 84.8 84.8 00% 84.8 00% LNARWSD000078 44.2 6532.6 89.2 92% 574.8 88% * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag Table 6h: Amount of Functioning Riparian LRDO watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Key Map ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF ID # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** LRDO Group LRDOWSD000002 556 052.8 0367.3 9.6 89% 8793. 85% LRDOWSD000003 395 56.2 55.8 4880.9 88% 496 90% LRDOWSD000004 77 90.7 892.7 8.2 96% 83 97% LRDOWSD000005 75 05.2 09.6 057.8 97% 058. 97% LRDOWSD000007 73 67.5 225.4 749.9 96% 752.6 96% LRDOWSD000008 74 566.0 553. 55.4 00% 552. 00% LRDOWSD00000 76 56.5 52.4 32.5 98% 33. 98% LRDOWSD00002 692 866.7 805 777.7 97% 7784.2 97% LRDOWSD00003 338 2375.3 22.3 2 99% 2.5 00% LRDOWSD00007 394 399.9 34.2 22.2 84% 24.0 84% LRDOWSD00009 45.4 370.5 358.7 99% 363.4 99% LRDOWSD000024 3044 44.3 4.6 4.6 00% 4.6 00% LRDOWSD0000 647 977.0 958.2 9.5 97% 926. 97% LRDOWSD0000 648 39.7 84.3 27.2 92% 2760. 92% LRDOWSD000033 69 26. 24.8 90%. 90% LRDOWSD000038 453 3902.3 385.4 385.4 00% 385.4 00% LRDOWSD000039 72 909.0 88.7 88.7 00% 88.7 00% LRDOWSD000040 486 456.8 363.9 363.9 00% 363.9 00% LRDOWSD000042 67 377.9 354.8 327.6 98% 3.3 98% LRDOWSD000043 337 07.4 097.7 069.2 97% 070.7 98% LRDOWSD000046 336 3006.8 36.7 36.7 00% 36.7 00% LRDOWSD000047 4698 842.4 832.2 8 00% 8 00% LRDOWSD000048 392 45.8 43.9 43.9 00% 43.9 00% 20 UF Redflag 69

Key Map ID # Total ed Area Upland (UF) Area 2006 SHEG* area in UF 2006 % of UF at SHEG* 2006 UF Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** LRDO Group LRDOWSD00005 454 239.8 232.2 232.2 00% 232.2 00% LRDOWSD000053 66 75.9 7407.5 7407.2 00% 7407.2 00% LRDOWSD000054 335 53.2 4999.3 4999.3 00% 4999.3 00% LRDOWSD0000 7 3.6 5.0 5.0 00% 5.0 00% LRDOWSD000070 70 992.9 970. 970. 00% 970. 00% LRDOWSD000076 673 8666. 855.2 85.3 00% 8526.6 00% LRDOWSD000092 557 32.8.7.7 00%.7 00% LRDOWSD00027 65 9. 242.9 242.9 00% 242.9 00% LRDOWSD00040 645 83.2 797.8 795.3 00% 795.3 00% LRDOWSD0004 555 0.6 260.6 260.6 00% 260.6 00% LRDOWSD00043 452 480. 427.0 427.0 00% 427.0 00% LRDOWSD00049 334 308.8 307.8 3 00% 3 00% LRDOWSD00053 30 34.7 32.4 32.4 00% 32.4 00% LRDOWSD00058 63 99. 863. 863. 00% 863. 00% LRDOWSD0006 490 334.0 226.3 226.3 00% 226.3 00% LRDOWSD00062 449 309.8 4.9 5.4 99% 5.4 99% LRDOWSD00066 333 44 4335.8 4334.8 00% 4334.8 00% LRDOWSD00067 64 23.5 208.7 208.7 00% 208.7 00% LRDOWSD000 5587 66.3 64.0 64.0 00% 64.0 00% LRDOWSD00072 603 065.9 07.3 07.3 00% 07.3 00% LRDOWSD00075 69 20.8 2000.7 2000.7 00% 2000.8 00% LRDOWSD00079 56 76.0 7.8 7.8 00% 7.8 00% LRDOWSD00082 554 2357.2 22.8 22.8 00% 22.8 00% LRDOWSD00087 553 704.8 642.7 642.7 00% 642.7 00% LRDOWSD00090 330 53.6 5.5 5.5 00% 5.5 00% LRDOWSD0009 69 09.5 006.2 006.2 00% 006.2 00% LRDOWSD00095 4 763.6 00% 00% LRDOWSD00097 447 48.6 48.2 48.2 00% 48.2 00% LRDOWSD00099 552 587. 56.0 56.0 00% 56.0 00% LRDOWSD000200 64 24.3 0.6 0.6 00% 0.6 00% LRDOWSD000203 332 365.5 342.2 342.2 00% 342.2 00% LRDOWSD00024 45 972.5 90.6 90.6 00% 90.6 00% LRDOWSD00026 67 985.4 792.6 792.6 00% 792.6 00% LRDOWSD00027 33 822. 76. 76. 00% 76. 00% LRDOWSD000 393 909. 875.5 875. 00% 875. 00% LRDOWSD000237 648 2.0 236.4 236.4 00% 236.4 00% LRDOWSD000240 62 586.5 543.6 543.6 00% 543.6 00% LRDOWSD0002 8 642.8 5.3 5.2 00% 5.2 00% LRDOWSD0003 82 39.0 24.7 24.7 00% 24.7 00% LRDOWSD000307 80 20 87.3 87.3 00% 87.3 00% LRDOWSD00032 232 42.9 40.7 40.7 00% 40.7 00% * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag 70

Table 6i: Amount of Functioning Riparian LSKE watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Key Map ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF ID # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* 20 UF Redflag Watershed** LSKE Group LSKEWSD000006 422 8385.7 7797.9 7642. 98% 7669.5 98% LSKEWSD000009 496 8970.7 67.0 6084.0 95% 6203.4 96% LSKEWSD00005 8 44.0 38.3 38.3 00% 38.3 00% LSKEWSD00009 2 56.8 062.5 062.0 00% 062.0 00% LSKEWSD000026 7 675.2 67.7 67.7 00% 67.7 00% LSKEWSD0000 6 43.0 2749.0 2730. 99% 2730. 99% LSKEWSD00003 362 3 30.4 26.2 89% 2647.5 87% LSKEWSD000032 22 902.8 858.2 858. 00% 858. 00% LSKEWSD000034 627 747.3 696. 576.8 83% 589.7 85% LSKEWSD000035 305 334.2 0.5 862.8 69% 862.9 69% LSKEWSD000036 494 45.4 2482.8 237.7 93% 237.7 93% LSKEWSD000037 2 975.8 940. 932.5 99% 935.8 00% LSKEWSD000038 6 548.3 56.8 55.2 00% 55.5 00% LSKEWSD000040 5 276. 27.4 234 86% 2367.2 87% LSKEWSD000042 302 476.5 405.0 405.0 00% 405.0 00% LSKEWSD000044 423 3344.5 3.2 34.9 00% 34.9 00% LSKEWSD000045 497 456.7 394.4 394.4 00% 394.4 00% LSKEWSD000047 20 4677. 4532.6 45.9 00% 45.9 00% LSKEWSD000048 420 999.7 8472.8 885. 98% 8 99% LSKEWSD000049 9 573.4 4738.4 452. 88% 452. 88% LSKEWSD00005 9.5 888.5 888.0 00% 888.0 00% LSKEWSD000054 475 24.4 2275.9 773.5 78% 773.5 78% LSKEWSD000055 2 403 39.5 3949.0 00% 3949.0 00% LSKEWSD000056 303 3657.7 3443.9 3055.5 89% 3093. 90% LSKEWSD000057 42 273.3 05.9 77.5 69% 77.5 69% LSKEWSD000058 4 6963.6 6647.9 562.0 85% 562.0 85% LSKEWSD0000 3 36 304.6 278.7 88% 278.7 88% LSKEWSD000060 498 856.0 88.2 808.6 99% 808.6 99% LSKEWSD00006 480 2098. 20.7 202 00% 202 00% LSKEWSD000062 6 838.9 803.0 783.9 98% 783.9 98% LSKEWSD000063 304 448. 445.7 44. 99% 44. 99% LSKEWSD000064 499 662.7 574.8 543.5 98% 564.9 99% LSKEWSD000065 5 699.3 645.7 645.2 00% 645.2 00% LSKEWSD000066 360 248.7 22. 226.9 00% 226.9 00% LSKEWSD000067 62.5 563.2 562. 00% 562. 00% LSKEWSD0000 6 209.5 208.5 208.5 00% 208.5 00% LSKEWSD000069 7 892.7 866.4 866.4 00% 866.4 00% LSKEWSD000070 474 55.8 20.4 2679.5 00% 2679.5 00% LSKEWSD00007 626 347.2 3. 2.7 00% 2.7 00% LSKEWSD000072 36 323.7 37.7 37.7 00% 37.7 00% LSKEWSD000073 4 09.8 07.7 07.7 00% 07.7 00% LSKEWSD000074 2 23..9.9 00%.9 00% LSKEWSD000075 8 369.9 353. 353. 00% 353. 00% LSKEWSD000076 0 34. 308. 305.3 99% 305.3 99% LSKEWSD000077 239.3 227.4 227.4 00% 227.4 00% LSKEWSD000078 9 322.4 23.8 23 00% 23 00% LSKEWSD000079 0 77. 5.9 5.3 00% 5.3 00% LSKEWSD000080 3 2.4 426.5 424.9 00% 424.9 00% * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 7

Table 6j: Amount of Functioning Riparian MBNK watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Total Upland 2006 2006 % Key Map ed (UF) SHEG* area of UF at 2006 UF ID # Area Area in UF SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** MBNK Group MBNKWSD000002 402 2607.8 2388.4 2388.4 00% 2388.4 00% MBNKWSD000003 464 2408.2 23.2 23.0 00% 23.0 00% MBNKWSD00006 344 652.7 463.9 463.9 00% 463.9 00% MBNKWSD00004 20 4397.2 3938.0 3938.0 00% 3938.0 00% MBNKWSD000054 92.5 45.4 45.4 00% 45.4 00% MBNKWSD000060 575 5. 2 2 00% 2 00% MBNKWSD00007 400 987.8 730. 730. 00% 730. 00% MBNKWSD0004 3733 5.4 44.4 44.4 00% 44.4 00% MBNKWSD000 0 45. 35.3 35.3 00% 35.3 00% MBNKWSD00026 200 67.7 408.4 408.4 00% 408.4 00% MBNKWSD000 760 9. 79.5 79.5 00% 79.5 00% MBNKWSD00044 655 87. 77.8 704.5 96% 62.2 92% MBNKWSD00045 404.6 2702.9 2665.8 99% 79.0 95% MBNKWSD00049 97 004.2 6.8 6.8 00% 6.8 00% MBNKWSD0006 99 52.5 94.9 94.9 00% 94.9 00% MBNKWSD00064 98 344.7 38.0 38.0 00% 38.0 00% MBNKWSD00066 96 8. 623.8 623.8 00% 623.8 00% MBNKWSD00067 40 72.9 630.6 630.6 00% 630.6 00% MBNKWSD0007 460 742.6 636.9 636.9 00% 636.9 00% MBNKWSD00072 342 264.0 23 23 00% 23 00% MBNKWSD00073 4552 36.8 32.5 32.5 00% 32.5 00% MBNKWSD00082 343 4663.2 3.3 3.3 00% 3.3 00% MBNKWSD00086 558 465.2 374.8 374.8 00% 374.8 00% MBNKWSD00088 95 3586.8 3206.2 3206.2 00% 3206.2 00% MBNKWSD00089 607 704.9 649.5 649.5 00% 649.5 00% MBNKWSD00095 452.0 402.4 402.4 00% 402.4 00% MBNKWSD00096 22 494.3 4.8 4.8 00% 4.8 00% MBNKWSD00020 399 3858.4 3463.4 3463.4 00% 3463.4 00% MBNKWSD000207 94 263.8 779. 779. 00% 779. 00% MBNKWSD000323 852 44.8 35. 35. 00% 35. 00% * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag 72

Table 6k: Amount of Functioning Riparian NBNK watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Total Upland 2006 2006 % Key Map ed (UF) SHEG* area of UF at 2006 UF ID # Area Area in UF SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** NBNK Group NBNKWSD000003 20 260.6 66.2 66.2 00% 66.2 00% NBNKWSD000022 209 380.5 42.0 42.0 00% 42.0 00% NBNKWSD000047 208 433.7 243.3 234. 96% 234. 96% NBNKWSD00005 346 5.2 82.4 82.4 00% 82.4 00% NBNKWSD00009 0 62.5 98.4 98.4 00% 98.4 00% NBNKWSD0002 492 349.2 304.4 304.4 00% 304.4 00% NBNKWSD0005 462 903.7 357. 357. 00% 357. 00% NBNKWSD00037 654 8.4 4.0 4.0 00% 4.0 00% NBNKWSD00065 345 2 40.9 40.9 00% 40.9 00% NBNKWSD000233 347 492.2 407.4 407.4 00% 407.4 00% NBNKWSD000235 207 643.4 6.3 6.3 00% 6.3 00% NBNKWSD000247 2 26.8 203.9 2007. 99% 2007. 99% NBNKWSD0009 463 27.3 846.2 846.2 00% 846.2 00% NBNKWSD000306 205 735.7 826.4 826.4 00% 826.4 00% NBNKWSD000307 206 658.6 207.7 207.7 00% 207.7 00% NBNKWSD00033 560 787.9 805.9 805.9 00% 805.9 00% NBNKWSD000326 606 927.3 548.0 548.0 00% 548.0 00% NBNKWSD000335 5 62 354. 354. 00% 354. 00% NBNKWSD000343 56 5.9 347.0 347.0 00% 347.0 00% NBNKWSD000345 653 52.8 47 47 00% 47 00% NBNKWSD000356 203 7. 22.7 22.7 00% 22.7 00% NBNKWSD000366 403 872.5 674.9 674.9 00% 674.9 00% NBNKWSD00038 204 366.9 827.8 827.8 00% 827.8 00% NBNKWSD000393 6.9 20.8 20.8 00% 20.8 00% NBNKWSD00044 46 306. 207.6 207.6 00% 207.6 00% NBNKWSD00048 666 0. 75. 75. 00% 75. 00% NBNKWSD000452 202 83.8 5.6 5.6 00% 5.6 00% NBNKWSD0004 3704 30.5 8. 8. 00% 8. 00% NBNKWSD000527 53 609.5 55.7 55.7 00% 55.7 00% * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag 73

Table 6l: Amount of Functioning Riparian PORI watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Map ID # Total ed Area Upland (UF) Area 2006 SHEG* area in UF 2006 % of UF at SHEG* 2006 UF Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** PORI Group PORIWSD00093 587 78.5 472.9 472.9 00% 472.9 00% PORIWSD0008 342. 22.8 22.8 00% 22.8 00% PORIWSD0009 2 237.8 66.5 66.5 00% 66.5 00% PORIWSD00032 37.6 27.2 27.2 00% 27.2 00% PORIWSD000423 4234 39.4.5.5 00%.5 00% PORIWSD000457 6 440.5 4.5 4.5 00% 4.5 00% PORIWSD0003 6795 90.7 85.7 85.7 00% 85.7 00% PORIWSD0005 58 40.8 33.5 33.5 00% 33.5 00% PORIWSD000532 276 3955.5 274.2 0965. 86% 34.5 89% PORIWSD000542 00.6 27.3 27.3 00% 27.3 00% PORIWSD000608 278 33.9 37.0 394.8 97% 357.7 96% PORIWSD0006 43 405.9 335.5 877.4 66% 979.2 73% PORIWSD00062 205 3.3 72.5 72.5 00% 72.5 00% PORIWSD0006 23.4 2.8 2.8 00% 2.8 00% PORIWSD0006 82 38.7 34.6 34.6 00% 34.6 00% PORIWSD00069 358 736.0 537.6 537.5 00% 537.5 00% PORIWSD000695 2638.6 93.2 93.2 00% 93.2 00% PORIWSD000696 232 79.7 38.7 38.7 00% 38.7 00% PORIWSD00070 275 7902.3 582.3 5806.3 00% 580.9 00% PORIWSD000706 585 266.5 2056. 203 99% 203 99% PORIWSD00076 0 47.3 265.5 265.5 00% 265.5 00% PORIWSD000740 3 624.0 52 492. 98% 442.3 95% PORIWSD00076 279 458.6 45.7 45.7 00% 45.7 00% PORIWSD000774 3489 308.7 2.6 2.6 00% 2.6 00% PORIWSD00080 2 69.4 55.3 55.3 00% 55.3 00% PORIWSD000837 582 200.5 094.0 05.3 96% 05.3 96% PORIWSD000865 274 866.9 7.6 7.6 00% 7.6 00% PORIWSD000867 273 842.9 577.9 577.9 00% 577.9 00% PORIWSD000889 667 334.0 267. 266.8 00% 266.8 00% PORIWSD000909 270 4542. 3643.5 3642.5 00% 3396.6 93% PORIWSD00090 584 447.0 392.8 392.8 00% 392.8 00% PORIWSD00092 42 00 836.4 836.4 00% 836.4 00% PORIWSD00095 27 242.8 204.7 20.9 00% 20.9 00% PORIWSD000920 5 4. 92.0 92.0 00% 92.0 00% PORIWSD000926 272 589.9 30.7 30.7 00% 30.7 00% PORIWSD000939 583 5. 377.0 377.0 00% 377.0 00% PORIWSD000965 277 342.2 43. 43. 00% 43. 00% PORIWSD000977 269 3065.5 88.9 88.3 00% 55.8 99% PORIWSD00002 60 44 3.2 3.0 00% 3.0 00% PORIWSD00085 324 34.5 24.0 24.0 00% 24.0 00% PORIWSD00095 2 462.7 2.9 2. 00% 2. 00% PORIWSD00099 586 793.2 736.2 736.2 00% 736.2 00% PORIWSD0007 75 8.7 92.4 92.4 00% 92.4 00% PORIWSD003 3 5.9 4.4 4.4 00% 4.4 00% PORIWSD0043 580 34.5 3095.5 3094. 00% 3095.4 00% PORIWSD00266 277 58.6 47.6 47.6 00% 47.6 00% PORIWSD00275 6065 27.7 26.7 26.7 00% 26.7 00% PORIWSD003 58 99.4 84.9 84.9 00% 84.9 00% PORIWSD00347 2736 4 3.6 3.6 00% 3.6 00% PORIWSD00376 435 73.3 65. 65. 00% 65. 00% PORIWSD00486 666 38.5 36.7 36.7 00% 36.7 00% PORIWSD00524 6096 65.4.0.0 00%.0 00% * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag 74

Table 6m: Amount of Functioning Riparian WORC watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Total Upland 2006 2006 % Map ID ed (UF) SHEG* area of UF at 2006 UF # Area Area in UF SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* 75 20 UF Redflag Watershed** WORC Group WORCWSD000002 7939.0 724. 722.4 00% 722.4 00% WORCWSD000006 378 8266.8 836.4 7954.3 98% 7936.5 98% WORCWSD00002 473 2739.9 42.7 4.3 00% 4.3 00% WORCWSD000023 09 5405. 4554.6 4237. 98% 4244.3 98% WORCWSD000024 30 3649.2 347 347 00% 347 00% WORCWSD000032 48 44.2 309.2 309.2 00% 309.2 00% WORCWSD000033 9 499.0 4958.0 474 96% 474 96% WORCWSD000034 472 3070.5 76.6 76.6 00% 76.6 00% WORCWSD000047 377 4223. 487.5 385.2 92% 385.2 92% WORCWSD00006 0 3269.9 36.0 338.3 99% 338.3 99% WORCWSD000070 489 483.8 444.7 444.7 00% 444.7 00% WORCWSD000076 300 07.2 96.0 96.0 00% 96.0 00% WORCWSD000087 657 34.0 33.3 33.3 00% 33.3 00% WORCWSD000088 527 5335.4 522.9 95.5 99% 99.0 00% WORCWSD00000 0 5745.3 54.3 5304.9 93% 526.5 92% WORCWSD00002 08 49.5 08.2 2074.9 74% 279. 78% WORCWSD0002 02 493.5 47 463.8 00% 463.8 00% WORCWSD0003 03 542.8 539.9 532.9 99% 532.9 99% WORCWSD0004 405 34.2 32 047.4 79% 047.4 79% WORCWSD0005 376 84.9 778.3 773.6 99% 773.6 99% WORCWSD0006 00 4237.2 455. 446. 00% 446.4 00% WORCWSD0007 47 695.7 674.3 674.3 00% 674.3 00% WORCWSD0009 438 64.7 6.8 567.0 93% 567.0 93% WORCWSD00020 99 2757.7 2734.3 2649.0 97% 2649.0 97% WORCWSD0002 375 4545.4 466.2 4087.4 98% 400.9 98% WORCWSD00024 2422 24.5 22.0 22.0 00% 22.0 00% WORCWSD00042 8 2754. 262.0 26.4 00% 26.4 00% WORCWSD00043 06.3 224.9 22. 00% 223.0 00% WORCWSD00046 07 544.5 537.3 7.4 84% 7.4 84% WORCWSD00047 634 5557.3 589.5 52 99% 4999.6 96% WORCWSD0005 0 89.5 35.8 35.8 00% 35.8 00% WORCWSD00062 3 2.8 87.3 87.3 00% 87.3 00% WORCWSD00067 0 646.4 494.4 494. 00% 494. 00% WORCWSD000 9 95.4 85.6 85.6 00% 85.6 00% WORCWSD0007 04 533.6 58.7 40. 92% 40. 92% WORCWSD00088 672 0.3 02.2.3 67%.3 67% WORCWSD00096 493 92 792.0 792.0 00% 792.0 00% WORCWSD00098 488 474.5 4.9 4.9 00% 4.9 00% WORCWSD00020 37 74.9 74.7 66.7 95% 73.9 00% WORCWSD000205 4 2084.5 8.4 8.4 00% 8.4 00% WORCWSD000220 526 9.4 893.3 884.0 00% 884.0 00% WORCWSD000222 676 3.2 39.8 347.0 87% 3223.7 90% WORCWSD000224 375. 322.4 322.4 00% 322.4 00% WORCWSD000226 2432 69.4 64.2 60.9 98% 60.9 98% WORCWSD000227 636 978.4 969.0 966.3 00% 966.3 00% WORCWSD0002 05 348.6 334.0 309.6 98% 309.6 98% WORCWSD000232 589.2 02.3 02.3 00% 02.3 00% WORCWSD00024 5 799.8 9.8.2 99%.2 99% WORCWSD000243 2 237.3 207.6 207.6 00% 207.6 00% WORCWSD000246 98 54.6 497.4 346.8 90% 346.8 90% WORCWSD000248 8 402.2 234.9 234.9 00% 234.9 00% WORCWSD000 52 20 74.3 5.8 87% 5.8 87% WORCWSD0003 5 88.7 804.3 804.3 00% 804.3 00% WORCWSD0007 95 35.4 34.5 3.3 98% 3.3 98% WORCWSD0008 9 6.6 5. 5 96% 49.3 9% WORCWSD00026 320 88. 85. 88% 88% WORCWSD000262 6 908.8 674.9 674.9 00% 674.9 00%

Key Map ID # Total ed Area Upland (UF) Area 2006 SHEG* area in UF 2006 % of UF at SHEG* 2006 UF Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* 76 20 UF Redflag Watershed** WORC Group WORCWSD000267 92 33.5 3247.6 34.0 97% 3.4 99% WORCWSD000269 7 08.2 73.2 73.2 00% 73.2 00% WORCWSD000272 788 75.2 7.9 7.5 99% 7.8 00% WORCWSD0003 39 3044.9 65.9 2. 85%.4 85% WORCWSD0005 7 64. 49. 49. 00% 49. 00% WORCWSD0006 94 363.7 36.3 30.5 86% 30.5 86% WORCWSD0007 96 887. 882.4 866.5 98% 866.5 98% WORCWSD000302 4888 54.6 53.8 37.5 89% 40.4 9% WORCWSD000307 374 2646.4 2635.3 2395.2 9% 2405.2 9% WORCWSD000308 66 46.3 3.7 3.7 00% 3.7 00% WORCWSD00035 97 405.3 403.5 363.2 90% 363.2 90% WORCWSD000322 93 78.9 72.5 7.8 00% 7.8 00% WORCWSD000326 46 849.5 633.4 633.4 00% 633.4 00% WORCWSD000338 6 98.3 56.7 56.7 00% 56.7 00% WORCWSD000346 5758.9 5.6 5.6 00% 5.6 00% WORCWSD000378 524 698.2 609.8 2.8 76% 246.5 77% WORCWSD000379 8 833.9 83.5 778.3 94% 792.9 95% WORCWSD000438 5773 3 2. 2. 00% 2. 00% WORCWSD000448 5 624.6 346.0 346.0 00% 346.0 00% WORCWSD000492 89 702.5 697.5 94.2 97% 94.2 97% WORCWSD000530 635 392.8 387.9 326.3 84% 337.7 87% WORCWSD000575 403 27.3 23.0 23.0 00% 23.0 00% WORCWSD000649 9 484.2 476.9 372.8 78% 372.8 78% WORCWSD000675 32 6.2 609.0 442. 73% 430.4 7% WORCWSD000692 2 49.9.5 982. 87% 982. 87% WORCWSD000784 33 4.5 32.8 32.8 00% 32.8 00% WORCWSD000792 4933 92.3 56.5 56.5 00% 56.5 00% WORCWSD000807 37 778.2 758.0 03.4 63% 03.4 63% WORCWSD000927 4 899.3 469.3 469.3 00% 469.3 00% WORCWSD000978 522 05.7 2489.3 2309.5 93% 2200.5 88% WORCWSD000985 322 523.3 9.4 4. 83% 4. 83% WORCWSD00002 38 245.8 6. 6. 00% 6. 00% WORCWSD0004 495 86.6 38.2 38.2 00% 38.2 00% WORCWSD0009 520 46.0 452.4 365.3 8% 365.3 8% WORCWSD000 88 3795.2 3708. 3700. 00% 3700. 00% WORCWSD00033 974. 4.5 4.5 00% 4.5 00% WORCWSD00049 523 83.7 78.9 765.3 98% 765.3 98% WORCWSD00097 373 69 660.4 575.3 95% 575.3 95% WORCWSD0073 3 338.3 3076.6 305.2 99% 3056.7 99% WORCWSD0079 588 632.6 938.9 938. 00% 938. 00% WORCWSD0086 372 35. 03.2 03.2 00% 03.2 00% WORCWSD0087 85 995.7 9.7 94.5 99% 733.4 90% WORCWSD0089 87 62.2 52.7 52.7 00% 52.7 00% WORCWSD0092 679 22. 274.2 904.4 88% 778.6 82% WORCWSD00209 83 39.5 3363.7 3324.8 99% 3324.8 99% WORCWSD00 45 27.9 5.4 5.4 00% 5.4 00% WORCWSD00226 90 398.5 37.4 0.6 78% 939.4 % WORCWSD00230 86 276.4 242.2.9 98%.9 98% WORCWSD00260 643.2 6.4 9.2 95% 573.6 9% WORCWSD00275 84 3997.6 373.8 3704.0 00% 3704.0 00% WORCWSD00278 437 3490.6 3323.2 34.9 99% 39.5 99% WORCWSD00324 093 344.4 208.0 96.5 94% 96.5 94% WORCWSD00336 37 576.0 546.9 546.9 00% 546.9 00% WORCWSD00340 74.4 44.3 44.3 00% 44.3 00% WORCWSD0034 07 37.4 9.5 9.5 00% 9.5 00% WORCWSD00345 3422 89.6.3.3 00%.3 00% WORCWSD00354 44 436. 42.8 477.3 99% 434.2 98% WORCWSD00367 6785 973.5 954.2 943.8 99% 899.7 94% WORCWSD00373 44 9.5 7.0 7.0 00% 7.0 00% * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas

77

78

79