PERFORMANCE. Costs and performance report This report examines Scottish Water s costs and performance in Overview.

Similar documents
International Workshop on Publicly Owned Energy Companies

Water Industry Commission for Scotland Integrating customer perspectives in a regulatory setting

Scotland s Water Industry: Past, Present and Future

ANGLIAN WATER GREEN BOND

Written Customer Complaints Complaint Handling in the Water Industry England and Wales April 2012 March 2013

September More detailed data on complaint and unwanted contact numbers can be found in appendices 1-10.

September Household complaints to water companies in England and Wales April 2017 March 2018

Research Briefing Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management in Wales

The Future of Air Transport

Yorkshire Forum for Water Customers

PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2008 ADULT SUPPORT AND PROTECTION. Report by the Executive Director (Housing & Community Care)

The Airport Charges Regulations 2011

MAXIMUM LEVELS OF AVIATION TERMINAL SERVICE CHARGES that may be imposed by the Irish Aviation Authority ISSUE PAPER CP3/2010 COMMENTS OF AER LINGUS

Economic regulation: A review of Gatwick Airport Limited s commitments framework

Seminario internacional sobre gestiόn privada de aeropuertos

Land area 1.73 million km 2 Queensland population (as at 31 December 2017) Brisbane population* (preliminary estimate as at 30 June 2017)

PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL. 22 June 2016 DEVELOPING THE CULTURAL OFFER IN PERTH AND KINROSS UPDATE AND NEXT STEPS

Ref: New Tariff for the Water and sewerage Company Inc. (WASCO) Page 1 of 9

The Strategic Commercial and Procurement Manager

Heathrow (SP) Limited

Heathrow (SP) Limited

Welcome from the Chair

National Infrastructure Assessment Technical Annex. Technical annex: Tidal power

Frequently Asked Questions

ABX. Holdings, Inc. BB&T Transportation Conference. February 2008

PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL. Housing and Health Committee. 25 May Perth and Kinross Local Housing Strategy

Construction Industry Focus Survey. Sample

East West Rail Consortium

THE CARICOM REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

4 Rights and duties in connection with the conduct of petroleum activities

Wales. Andy Thomas. Route Managing Director Wales. Ken Skates, Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Infrastructure, Welsh Government

Customer consultation

Report of the Strategic Director of Place to the meeting of Executive to be held on 11 September 2018

Press release Stockholm, 13/12/2017

Civil Aviation Policy and Privatisation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Abdullah Dhawi Al-Otaibi

ENVIRONMENTAL SCRUTINY COMMITTEE 6 DECEMBER 2016

NatWest UK Regional PMI

RAC Foundation for Motoring Local Authority Parking Finances in Scotland

State of the States October 2017 State & territory economic performance report. Executive Summary

CAA consultation on its Environmental Programme

LONDON HIGHER FACTSHEET 2011

The Research Fund for Coal and Steel

The December 2013 storm in England :the value of learning from the past

ISBN no Project no /13545

Thank you for participating in the financial results for fiscal 2014.

Working Towards Sustainable Tourism in England s AONBs

Airport Privatization

Investor Relations Update October 25, 2018

2Q 2017 Earnings Call. July 19, 2017

Minutes of the Meeting of the Board of Scottish Canals held on 23rd August 2012 at The Kingsmills Hotel, Inverness at 9.00am.

1Q 2017 Earnings Call. April 18, 2017

Welsh Government investment in rail services and infrastructure

Appendix B. Economy and Culture Scrutiny Committee. Work Programme items for consideration

2013/14 Pre-Budget Submission Accommodation Association of Australia

PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL. Enterprise and Infrastructure Committee 4 November 2009

Commission, Scotland

Decision Strategic Plan Commission Paper 5/ th May 2017

Recommendations on Consultation and Transparency

AIR CANADA REPORTS THIRD QUARTER RESULTS

The impacts of proposed changes in Air Passenger Duty

American Airlines Group Inc.

Scottish Parliament Devolution (Further Powers) Committee

AIR CANADA REPORTS 2010 THIRD QUARTER RESULTS; Operating Income improved $259 million or 381 per cent from previous year s quarter

Managing Director of Transmission. Report for the year 2012

Monarch airlines response to the CAA s review on Gatwick s commitment framework

Land area 1.73 million km 2 Queensland population (as at December 2016) Brisbane population* (preliminary estimate as at 30 June 2016)

HUNTLY MULTI SPORTS HUB: FEASIBILITY STUDY

Monifieth (Potentially Vulnerable Area 07/10) Local Plan District Local authority Main catchment Tay Estuary and Montrose Angus Council, Dundee coasta

FASI(N) IoM/Antrim Systemisation Airspace Change Decision

Item 1. Leadership Board. On: 1 April Report by: Director of Development and Housing Services. Heading: Update on City Deal. 1.

easyjet response to CAA Q6 Gatwick final proposals

Economic regulation: A review of Gatwick Airport Limited s commitments framework

Bus and Community Transport Services in Wales

USD thousand Q Q Change % Change 12M 2015

Terms of Reference: Introduction

BBC Scotland Submission to the Education and Culture Committee Inquiry on BBC Charter

Results of Tourism Activity. July, 2017

EAST KENT HOSPITALS UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Civil Aviation Authority: UK Aviation Consumer Survey. Key Findings. Autumn 2018

Health, Disability and Employment (Early Interventions) Project

Budget and AS welfare cuts. Sam Lister, Policy & Practice Officer, CIH

Update on the Thameslink programme

Local Government and Regeneration Committee Public Service Reform Strand 3 January 2013 SUBMISSION FROM THE HIGHLAND COUNCIL

Revalidation: lessons learned and reflections for the future. Una Lane Director Registration and Revalidation

Airlines UK 24 May 2018: Speech by Richard Moriarty

Enhanced Engagement Terms of Reference:

Scotland s railways - today

Rail Sta s cs Compendium Great Britain Annual

About Us. An introduction to Network Rail

Edinburgh Airport Corporate Responsibility Report 2008

Alternative Funding Models for Affordable Housing: Lessons from Scotland. Kenneth Gibb

UK household giving new results on regional trends

Performance monitoring report for 2014/15

2. Our response follows the structure of the consultation document and covers the following issues in turn:

Alternative service delivery models in place in Scottish local authorities: summary report

Contents. Global outlook. UK economic prospects. The outlook for consumer spending and the impact of automation. Regional growth trends and prospects

The impact of investments & storms on the economic benefits provided by the South West Coast Path National Trail to the region between 2010 and 2014

The Collection and Use of Safety Information

PROCESS FOR DEVELOPING RP2 IN RESPECT OF THE UK Workshop

RE: PROPOSED MAXIMUM LEVELS OF AIRPORT CHARGES DRAFT DETERMINATION /COMMISSION PAPER CP6/2001

Transcription:

PERFORMANCE Overview This report examines Scottish Water s costs and performance in 2006-07. Contact Katherine Russell Director of Corporate Affairs and Customer Service T 01786 430200 E enquiries@watercommission.co.uk

INTRODUCTION Context We are determined to make sure that Scottish customers receive value for money from their water services provider. Scottish Water s day-to-day running costs account for around a quarter of the money it spends, and customers pay these costs directly through their bills. We therefore monitor Scottish Water s progress in this area very closely. Ministers set objectives to improve water quality, environmental performance and customer service. We set prices that provide Scottish Water with sufficient resources to meet these objectives provided it meets our expectations of improved efficiency. This report examines the progress Scottish Water has made in delivering improved performance and in lowering its running costs. We will report on Scottish Water s expenditure on capital investment (that is, investment to maintain and improve its assets) towards the end of the 2006-10 regulatory control period. INTRODUCTION Associated documents Costs and performance report 2003-06,, November 2006. Customer service report 2006-07,, October 2007. The Strategic Review of Charges 2006-10: The final determination, Water Industry Commission for Scotland, November 2005. 1

KEY MESSAGES KEY MESSAGES Since Scottish Water was formed in 2002 it has made excellent progress in reducing its running costs. We are pleased to report that it has reduced its operating costs for five years in a row. These costs are now some 40% lower than they were. As a result customers are saving more than 3 million a week 1. Customers are already seeing the benefits of Scottish Water s lower costs in their bills. Water and sewerage bills in Scotland now compare well with those in England and Wales. The prospects for future bills in Scotland are also good, as Scottish Water continues to meet and beat our expectations of improved efficiency. In 2006-07, Scottish Water s running costs were around 5% better than our expectations. This outperformance is an early indication that the clear incentive framework that we put in place in 2005 is serving the interests of Scottish customers well. Scottish Water has not cut its operating costs by cutting corners. At the same time as reducing its costs, it has improved the level of service to customers 2. Scottish Water must not, however, be complacent. Looking forward, there is scope to improve customer service further while maintaining its recent progress in controlling costs. 1 All numbers in this report are in 2006-07 prices. 2 2 The overall performance assessment is a customer service index that is commonly used in the water industry. Our Customer service report 2006-07 (published in October 2007) provides further information about Scottish Water s performance.

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT Overall progress For the fifth year in a row Scottish Water has improved its efficiency. Scottish Water s operating costs are now around 40% lower than those of the three former water authorities. Its customer service performance, as measured by the overall performance assessment (OPA) is also considerably better. Figure 1 summarises these improvements. Figure 1: Scottish Water s costs and performance Cost (annual operating cost) 2002 2007 438 million 268 million PERFORMANCE Performance (customer service score OPA) 133 232 Impact on customers bills As a result of its lower costs, Scottish Water has saved around 1 billion since 2001. Customers are seeing the benefits of this through lower bills, which now compare well with those for customers in England and Wales, as Figure 2 shows. Figure 2: Average household bills in Scotland, and in England and Wales 500 2006-07 household bill 400 300 200 100 Thames Severn Trent Northumbrian Yorkshire Scottish Water Southern United Utilities Anglian Wessex ^ Dwr Cymru South West 3

PERFORMANCE Future outlook for bills The outlook for bills in Scotland is also positive by comparison with those south of the border. Figure 3 shows the likely average bills up to 2009-10 3. Figure 3: Forecast average bills in Scotland, and in England and Wales Average bill ( ) 350 England and Wales 300 Scotland 250 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Progress on operating costs Scottish Water s operating costs in 2006-07 were 170 million less than the level inherited from the three former water authorities. Figure 4 shows Scottish Water s year-on-year progress in reducing its operating costs. Scottish Water s achievement is unprecedented in the UK water industry. Not surprisingly, however, the pace of change has slowed as areas of excess cost become harder to identify and as improvements in customer service continue to be required. Figure 4: Scottish Water s progress on operating costs 450 Operating expenditure ( m) 400 350 300 Fifth year of reductions in a row Overall improvement 40% 250 200 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 3 Figure 3 shows expected average household bills before inflation. 4

Incentives a clear framework Our final determination included six important steps designed to strengthen the governance of Scottish Water and create appropriate organisational incentives. These involved: proper limits on Scottish Water s costs if managers fail to meet expectations, costs will be met from public expenditure, not from customers; a temporary loan facility ( 50 million until 2010) to cover unexpected costs such as emergencies or changes in legal obligations, but not the costs of management failure; a growing savings account (or gilts buffer ) to replace this facility, financed by outperformance of our expectations; transfer of savings to customers after four years, keeping bills down; bonuses to Scottish Water s management that can only be paid when our expectations are beaten; formal scrutiny every three months of Scottish Water s delivery of the investment benefits required by Scottish Ministers. Early indications are that this framework is working well. We set our expectations for improved efficiency in each year of the current regulatory control period, which runs from 2006 to 2010. Our expectations define the limits on what Scottish Water can spend. We are pleased to report that in 2006-07 Scottish Water beat our expectations in operating costs by 5%. PERFORMANCE Incentives raising the bar Customers benefit from the incentive framework that we use in setting prices. Every improvement in costs and performance that Scottish Water makes, allows us to raise the bar further when we next set prices. If Scottish Water were to continue to outperform our operating cost expectations by 5%, we would set prices so that they covered only 95% of the original assumed costs (and we would of course still build in further efficiencies). Similarly, if Scottish Water continues to outperform OPA expectations for customer service, we would rebase our expectations for further improvement over 2010-14. Incentives determining the gilts buffer The fund that we established to hold outperformance both in capital expenditure and operating costs would be invested in index-linked, gilt-edged securities. It would act as a buffer or savings account that insulates customers from the costs of any operational shocks that are outside the reasonable control of management (such as, for example, the impacts of the severe flooding in Severn Trent s area this summer). The gilts buffer would only be accessible to Scottish Water with the agreement of the Commission and Scottish Ministers. 5

CONCLUSION CONCLUSION In the past year Scottish Water has done well to reduce its operating costs by more than we assumed in our final determination. It has also improved its level of service significantly. This bodes well for the level of prices that customers will have to pay in the future. We trust that the good performance in operating costs and improving levels of service will be complemented by an improvement in Scottish Water s delivery of its capital investment programme 4. 4 For more information, see our Investment report 2006-07. 6

7

8

8.11.07 Ochil House, Springkerse Business Park, Stirling FK7 7XE. T 01786 430200 F 01786 462018 E enquiries@watercommission.co.uk www.watercommission.co.uk