EQUIDAS. The M6.5, Nov 17th 2015, Lefkada earthquake Reconaissance Report. Christos Giarlelis, Christos Mpoutsoras Structural Engineers

Similar documents
3-Dimensional Rocking and Sliding Case Histories in the 2014 Cephalonia, Greece Earthquakes

Preliminary Information on the 2003 Tokachi-oki Earthquake

Characteristics of damage to transportation facilities induced by the ground shaking and the tsunami of the 2011 East Japan mega earthquake

HISTORIC BUILDING PERFORMANCE IN EARTHQUAKE: DAMAGE ON BUILDINGS AND IMPACT OF PREVIOUS INTERVENTIONS

Seismic Microzonation in Hurghada City (EGYPT)

Makoto Watabe Professor of Environment and Information, Keio University, 'L-25-5 Tokiwadai Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, Japan

PRELIMINARY REPORT. The earthquake of January 8, 2013 at SE of Limnos Island, Northern Aegean, Greece I. Kalogeras, N. Melis & C.

MARCH 2011, TSUNAMI DISASTER IN JAPAN

Preliminary Report. The April 16, 2015 Kasos Earthquake, SE Aegean, Greece Ioannis Kalogeras and Nikolaos S. Melis

Chile Earthquake M8.8 Saturday 2/27/2010

BRIEF INFORMATION ON THE RECORDS

REPORT OF STUDY TRIP (Niigata & Miyagi Prefectures)

Tsunami Survey Results in the NPS and Reproduction Analysis Using Tsunami Inversion

GREAT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER NILIM, JAPAN

The Arequipa (Peru) earthquake of June 23, 2001

Report on Field Survey of Solomon Islands Earthquake Tsunami in April 2007

An Analysis of the Restraint Sufficiency of the Happijac Tie-Down System for Truck- Mounted Slide-In Campers

Photo 1: Tsunami wave flowed over 4-m high breakwater. Photo 2: No damage was observed in these timber houses.

The Hokkaido Earthquake: a (very) preliminary analysis revision 1

1) Earthquake and Strong Ground Motion Acc.(cm/s/s)

The February 27, 2010 Chile Earthquake. Roberto Leon School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Georgia Tech Atlanta, GA

Executive Summary of Urgent Field Survey of Earthquake and Tsunami Disasters by the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake

Figure 1: Damage on Adobe Houses

Lefkada through the eyes of Agni Studios!

Lake Dunstan Trail Project - Geotechnical Review

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON WOODEN HOUSE DAMAGE BETWEEN 1995 KOBE EQRTHQUAKE AND 2000 TOTTORI EARTHQUAKE OF JAPAN

Tsunami Impacting Eastern Japan and Preparedness for Extraordinary Natural Disaster. Takehiko Fujita

4.3.2 Earthquake Location and Extent

PROBLEMS ON EARTHQUAKE DISASTERS IN RURAL AREA- CONSIDERATION FROM THE RECENT DAMAGING EARTHQUAKES IN HOKKAIDO, NORTHERN JAPAN

Seismic monitoring of Séchilienne rockslide

REPORT OF STUDY TRIP (TOHOKU)

DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF SAND FENCING GARDEN CITY, NORTH LITCHFIELD AND LITCHFIELD BEACH GEORGETOWN COUNTY, SC

Canterbury Earthquakes 2010/11 Port Hills Slope Stability: Pilot study for assessing life-safety risk from rockfalls (boulder rolls)

Response to Tsunami Disaster -the Great East Japan Earthquake 2011-

Chapter 10. Damage to Ports and Coastal Facilities

A New Fragment of Proto-Aeolic Capital from Jerusalem

along a transportation corridor in

Title. Author(s)ISHII, K.; KIKUCHI, M.; SHIRAI, K. Issue Date Doc URL. Type. Note. File Information HIGASHI-HONGANJI HAKODATE BETSUIN

Measures for Earthquake-Resistance Enhancement of Industrial Complexes around The Tokyo Bay

CURRENT STATUS OF ELABORATION OF MAPS FOR CLIMATIC AND SEISMIC ACTION: Country report of MONTENEGRO

JUNE 23, 2001 ATICO, PERU EARTHQUAKE

Chapter 1 Case Studies and Study Guide: Introduction to Natural Disasters and Human Impact DRAFT

Mediterranean Europe

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

TSUNAMI DAMAGE IN PORTS BY THE 2011 OFF PACIFIC COAST OF TOHOKU EARTHQUAKE

Investigation report on Kumamoto earthquake

I508. Devonport Peninsula Precinct

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PERTAINING TO STEEL WIRE ROPE NET SYSTEMS FOR THE PREVENTION OF SNOW AVALANCHES1. Robert A. Thommen, Jr.

Figure Pre- and post-disaster satellite topographical maps

American Conservation Experience

Effect of Support Conditions on Static Behavior of 1400m main span and 700m side span Cable-stayed Bridge

SHEET PILE WALLS A SPACE-SAVING AVALANCHE DEFENCE STRUCTURE

THE Mw 6.8 OCTOBER 26, 2018 ZAKYNTHOS (IONIAN SEA, GREECE) EARTHQUAKE

NJAA - NAARSO OUTREACH SEMINAR 2017

SITE EFFECT CHARACTERISTICS OF DAMAGE CONCENTRATED AREA DUE TO THE 2003 COLIMA EARTHQUAKE (M7.6), MEXICO

EO Contribution to Recovery Activities - A case study on the experience of the Great East Japan Earthquake -

WAIMAKARIRI DISTRICT COUNCIL REPORT. Craig Sargison, Manager Community and Recreation

1. USACE Response to Sandy Ports 2. NAVFAC Response to Sandy - Base 3. USSOUTHCOM/NAVFAC Response in HaiC Port Au Prince Port

Stability determination of ceilings of some caves

REPORT OF STUDY TRIP (TOHOKU)

The Greek-Swedish-Danish Excavations at Kastelli, Khania 2010 a short report

5.4.5 EARTHQUAKE. This section provides a profile and vulnerability assessment for the earthquake hazard. HAZARD PROFILE

REPORT OF STUDY TRIP (Niigata & Miyagi Prefectures)

Report to Congress Aviation Security Aircraft Hardening Program

WHENUAPAI AIRBASE IMPACTS OF CLOSURE ON CIVIL DEFENCE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT IN THE AUCKLAND REGION

GLACIER STUDIES OF THE McCALL GLACIER, ALASKA

THE 2011 VAN EARTHQUAKES OCURRED IN TURKEY

Trench 91 revealed that the cobbled court extends further to the north.

This section provides a profile and vulnerability assessment for the earthquake hazard.

The project comprises the design of the following works:

Restoration and Challenge of Sendai Towards a Disaster-Resilient and Environmentally-Friendly City

Japan Earthquake and Tsunami: a view from satellite data

Population Movement in the Tohoku Region after the Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster

University of Colorado, Colorado Springs Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Department. MAE 4415/5415 Project #1 Glider Design. Due: March 11, 2008

Comparative Study of Design Berthing Energy on Fender as per Indian Standard IS4651 Part-3:1974 and British Standard BS6349 Part-4:1994

Technical Design Manual

Earthquake and Tsunami Risk management in GREECE

KNOWLEDGE NOTE 1-3. Hydro-meteorological Disasters Associated with Tsunamis and Earthquakes. CLUSTER 1: Structural Measures

THE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A PRACTICAL TSUNAMI EVACUATION DRILL

DD FORM 3009, FEB 2016 REPLACES DA FORM 1247, WHICH IS OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 6 Pages Adobe Professional X

Recreation Opportunity Spectrum for River Management v

2011 BUILDINGS CENSUS

NUMERICAL STUDY OF FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION IN CONCRETE GRAVITY DAMS

Dallas Executive Airport

BELFAST MUNICIPAL AIRPORT OVERVIEW

Disaster Committee, Tohoku Chapter Mr. Mitsuo Ikami, Taiheiyo Cement Co. (Translated by Shunsuke Otani, University of Tokyo)

Travel by coach from City, University of London to Schofield Centre, Cambridge University

MetroView TM FG 501T Window Wall

Provincial Railway Technical Standards

Installation Instructions for the Rolltec Physique XL Awning

Typical avalanche problems

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

Post tsunami Recovery of Port and Harbor areas in Japan from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake Tsunami

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

World on the Edge - Climate Data - Ice Melt and Sea Level Rise

Guide to Siting of Seawalls January 13, 2014 by Michael Walther, P.E., D.CE, President - Coastal Tech

Ancient Greek Buildings/ Fortifications. Matthew Jackson

Thermedia experience From the vision to the industrial product. Emmanuel Guillon, LCR, LafargeHolcim July 5-6 th, 2016

Langtang Valley Assessment, Nepal

Republika e Kosovës Republika Kosova-Republic of Kosovo Qeveria-Vlada-Government KOSOVO GEOLOGICAL SURVEYS

Transcription:

The M6.5, Nov 17th 2015, earthquake Reconaissance Report Christos Giarlelis, Christos Mpoutsoras Structural Engineers December 2015

1. The event The earthquake occurred at 09:10am (07:10 GMT/UTC) November 17, 2015, with an estimated magnitude M w =6.5 according to USGS [1] (M L =6.0 according to ITSAK [2]) at a depth of 11.1 km. The source was located [3] on several segments of a known dextral fault zone 130km long and 30km deep, running parallel to the west shore of the island (Fig. 1.1). It is of particular interest that the earthquake occurred at the southern part of that fault occurred 12 years after the August 2003, M6.2 Lefkas, that ruptured the northern part of the same fault so it was a rather expected event. Furthermore, there is ample historical evidence (Table 1) of over a dozen earthquake induced destructions in during the past four centuries (Papazachos &Papazachos 1997). Available information suggests that 4 to 5 events above M 6¼ are released percentury. This is also true for the past century, during which five strong events took place (1914, 1948a, 1948b, 1978, 2003). The losses induced by the earthquake were relatively low compared to its intensity: two lives were lost (one from boulder impact which is rather unusual for Greece), less than 10 injured, a handful of old masonry buildings collapsed and a large number of masonry and RC buildings were damaged. For the latter most of the damage was limited to non structural elements, such as infill walls and roof tiles. On the other hand, geotechnical damage was much more pronounced since extensive rockfalls and landslides occurred on the southwest part of the island and along the coastal zone from Porto Katsiki to Ag. Nikitas. Quay walls in the port of Vassiliki suffered considerable displacements while large cracks and settlements on the road network were extensive. Fig. 1.1 Rough map of region showing fault and epicenter. The M 6.5,, 17 11 2015 earthquake, reconaissance report p2

TABLE 1: Destructive earthquakes in after 1577 A.D. [4] Location / Year 2015 2003 1973 Vasiliki 1948 Komilio 1914 1869 1825 1820 1815 Athani 1783 1769 1723 Athani 1722 1704 Katouna 1630 1625 1613 1612 1577 Magnitude Maximum Intensity 6.5 VII 6.4 IX Losses 2 dead, several collapsed buildings, serious damages in masonry structures and in the ports of the Vassiliki; Extended rock falls and landslides. No lives lost, 50 injured, one collapse, 5 R/C buildings damaged beyond repair, serious damages in masonry structures and in the ports of the capital and Lygia; Falling of rocks 5.8 VII Serious damages in the town of 6.5 IX 6.3 IX 11 dead, 244 collapses, serious damage in Vassiliki, Kalamitsi, Ag. Petros, Eglouvi; falling of rocks 16 dead, destruction of 18 villages, subsidence of Nydri port, rock falls, settlement at Kalamitsi 6.4 X 15 dead, destruction of villages Amaxiki and Tsoukalades 6.5 X 58 dead, destruction of the capital and several villages 6.4 IX Extensive damage in the capital, ground settlement in the central square 6.3 VIII 20 dead, destruction throughout the island 6.7 X 10 dead, 862 collapses throughout the island, destruction of the village Athani, extensive damage in 10 other villages 6.7 IX 7 dead, 497 collapses out of a total of 826 houses in the capital 6.7 VIII Significant damage in the island, especially in the capital 6.4 VIII Extensive collapses in Athani, Damiliani, Agios Petros, Agia Marina; serious damage in the castles of Agia Mavra and Aepetron 6.3 IX 34 dead, massive collapses in the city of and at Fryni 6.7 IX Collapses in the city of and at Katouna; Falling of rocks and trees, cracks in the ground, notably in the south part of the island 6.6 IX Massive collapses of masonry structures in the city 6.4 VIII 6.5 VIII Damage in 4 villages Destruction of houses, palaces and minarets in the city of, collapses throughout the island 6.2 VIII Damage to the city walls

2. Strong motion data The event was one of the strongest reported in the the area. According to the preliminary report published by EPPO ITSAK [2] the value of peak ground acceleration (PGA) was 0.36 g recorded at the village of Vassiliki (VAS 2 station) and 0.1 g at the city of (LEF 2 station). The records at the Vassiliki station corrsepond to response spectra with values that exceed those of the design spectra of both the Greek Code 2000 (GSC 2000) and the Eurocode 8 (EC8) as presented in Fig.2. In this Figure, the response spectra of the earthquake on directions N S and E W are plotted along those of GSC 2000 and EC8. For the latter, the reference peak ground acceleration is a gr =0.36g, the importance factor is considered as γ I = 1, the behaviour factor is taken q=1 and the ground type is assumed to be C, which is the common type of soil for most structures in the island. The horizontal broken line corresponds to the equivalent response spectrum of the 1959 Seismic Code the first seismic regulations in Greece. A large number of structures in were designed following that code based exclusively on pseudo dynamic considerations. A constant distribution of the lateral load with a value of (ε W) was considered, where ε is the seismic coefficient of the 1959 code and W is the gravity load of the structure. The equivalent demand in the realm of modern codes would be a constant response spectrum with R d = 1.75 (q ε), 1.75 being an empirical conversion factor between modern and Fig. 2.1 Response spectra of the 17/11/2015 Earthquake

old codes, relating reinforced concrete provisions based on allowable stresses and ultimate strength concepts. Should a value of 1.50 be adopted for the behaviour factor (a reasonable approximation for the older generation of RC structures in Greece built without capacity design considerations) and factor ε taken at 0.08 (wgich is the lowest specified by the 1959 code for the region), then R d = 0.21. From the response spectra of Fig. 2 it is obvious that the spectral values in terms of acceleration were higher than the requirements of the current codes at the periods between 0.2 to 0.5s which are critical for the majority of the buildings in the island. The spectral acceleration at the VAS 2 station reaches the value of 1.4g at 0.4s however this is lower than the peak spectral value of the devasting 2003 earthquake which reached the 2.2g at 0.5s [4]. 3. Landslides As has been already mentioned, the dominant type of the earthquake induced failures was rockfalls and landslides that affected the southwest part of the island. The most severe slope failures took place along the coastline from Porto Katsiki to Ag. Nikitas and especially the Egremnoi beach (Figs 3.1a, b). Also extensive rockfalls triggered by the earthquake took place along the road from Vassiliki to Agios Petros with displaced rocks of a size up to 3m (Figs 3.2a, b). At some places the mitigation measures consisting of retaining or restraining structures (retaining walls and rock curtains) failed due to the impact (Figs 3.2c, d). Overall the mitigation measures over the road network can be considered as effective preventing a larger catastrophe. Fig 3.1a, b Debris slide and rockfalls along the the coast of Egremnoi

Fig 3.2a, b, c, d Earthquake induced landslides along the road from Vassiliki to Agios Petros. 4. Damage to the port and waterfront area of Vasiliki The earthquake induced damages to the waterfront area of Vassiliki. The recently constructed pier and quay wall experienced displacement that possibly leaded to road cracks and small settlements at the Fig 4.1a, b Road cracks at the waterfront area of the port of Vassiliki.

waterfront area. We found no visible evidence of liquefaction however careful studies should determine if liquefaction actually took place. Fig 4.2a, b, c, d Displacement of new quay wall cracks at the waterfront area of the port of Vassiliki.

5. Damage to the road network The extensive cracks at the southwest part of the island's road network were a major damage in terms of cost and can be attributed to slope movement or fill settlement (Figs. 5.1 a, b, c, d and 5.2 a, b, c). Fig 5.1 a, b, c, d Asphalt cracks due to slope movement (a, b,c) or fill settlement (d).

Fig 5.2 a, b, c Asphalt cracks due to slope movement. 6. Building Damage In the villages of the southwestern part of the island, near the epicenter, several old masonry buildings sustained serious damage (Figs 6.1, 6.2). Characteristic is the collapse of the Agia Paraskevi church at Athani a historical structure built in the 18th century (Figs 6.3a,b). However most of these old buildings avoided collapse. A possible explanation is that the actual strength of traditional structures in the area (built using an ingenious combination of masonry and wood) is unusually high due to local design traditions (low weight, overstrength) [4]. Also it should be mentioned that geotechnical failures such as settlements may have contributed to some of the failures. New reinforced concrete structures experienced minimal damage usually concentrated at the columns' head of the top floor under the roof (Figs 6.4a,b, 6.4, 6.6). The uplift and dislocation of roof tiles was widely observed along with cracks on masonry infillwalls (Figs 6.7a,b,c,d). The latter is a proof of the high, earthquake induced, vertical accelerations at the epicenter area.

It should be mentioned that structures at the northeastern part of the island, including those in the town of, presented minimal or no damage. Fig 6.1 Damaged old masonry building at Vassiliki. Fig 6.2 Horizontal cracks around the openings of a masonry structure. Fig 6.3a, b The Church of Agia Paraskevi at Athani before and after the collapse, respectively. Fig 6.4a, b Cracks at the column' s head of the top floor under the roof and at the balcony parapet of the RC school building at Vassiliki.

Fig 6.5. Detachment of an infill wall from the surrounding RC frame at a two storey building in Vassiliki. Fig 6.6. Horizontal and vertical cracks on the infill walls of a building at Athani. Fig 6.7a, b,c,d. Uplift & dislocation of roof tiles of residential buildings at Dragano (a) and Athani (b,c,d).

Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank to John Kalyviotis for pictures 3.1a and 3.1b. References [1] USGS National Earthquake Information Center, PDE. [2] EPPO ITSAK, "Short preliminary report on the Lefkas Earthquake (Μ6.0) at 17 11 2015 7:10GMT". [3] A. Ganas, P. Briole, G. Papathanassiou, G. Bozionelos, A. Avallone, D. Melgar, P. Argyrakis, S. Valkaniotis, E. Mendonidis, A. Moshou, P. Elias, "A preliminary report on the Nov 17, 2015 M=6.4 South earthquake, Ionian Sea, Greece". [4] C. Giarlelis, D. Lekka, G. Mylonakis, D. Karabalis, The M6.4 2003, Greece, Earthquake: Dynamic Response of a 3 Storey R/C Structure On Soft Soil, Earthquakes and Structures, Vol 2, No 3, Pages 257 277, September 2011.