DECISION MEMO For Bullis Hollow Trail

Similar documents
White Mountain National Forest

Decision Memo Ice Age Trail Improvement (CRAC 37)

Decision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation

Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action

DECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction

BACKGROUND DECISION. Decision Memo Page 1 of 6

Tracy Ridge Shared Use Trails and Plan Amendment Project

Decision Memo Sun Valley Super Enduro & Cross-Country Mountain Bike Race. Recreation Event

White Mountain National Forest

DECISION MEMO Whetstone Ridge Trail #8020 Relocation

Rochester Ranger District Wellness Trails Project

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

Decision Memo for Philmont Scout Ranch Bike Trail and Access Reroute Project

DECISION MEMO North Zone (Legacy Trails) Trail Stabilization Project

Chattahoochee- Oconee National Forests. Decision Memo

White Mountain National Forest. Pond of Safety Accessible Trail & Shoreline Access Project. Scoping Report. Township of Randolph Coos County, NH

Proposed Action. Payette National Forest Over-Snow Grooming in Valley, Adams and Idaho Counties. United States Department of Agriculture

Bradley Brook Relocation Project. Scoping Notice. Saco Ranger District. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction

Hiawatha National Forest St. Ignace Ranger District. File Code: 1950 Date: August 5, 2011

Buford / New Castle Motorized Trail

Buffalo Pass Trails Project

Dodge Ridge Mountain Bike Trails (50375) Decision Memo

Chetco River Kayaking Permit

Memo. Board of County Commissioners. FROM: Tamra Allen, Planner. Buford/New Castle Motorized Trail. Date: February 13, 2012

DECISION MEMO Grand Targhee Resort Summer Trails. USDA Forest Service Caribou-Targhee National Forest Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401

Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance

White Mountain National Forest. Rumney Rocks Project Supplemental Environmental Assessment. 30-day Comment Report

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

RIM TRAIL EXTENSION PROJECT

USDA Forest Service Deschutes National Forest DECISION MEMO. Round Lake Christian Camp Master Plan for Reconstruction and New Facilities

Eagle Rock Loop Ouachita National Forest Page 1 of 8

CHAPTER III: TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS & PERMITS

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Merced Wild and Scenic River. Comprehensive Management Plan, Yosemite National Park, Madera and Mariposa

Crystal Lake Area Trails

USDA FOREST SERVICE, HIAWATHA NATIONAL FOREST Alger County, Michigan. Grand Island Primitive Cabins Project

Chetco River Kayaking Permit

Coronado National Forest Santa Catalina Ranger District

Ottawa National Forest Supervisor s Office

DECISION MEMO. for Single-Track Mountain Bike Trail Snowbird Ski and Summer Resort

Description of the Proposed Action for the Big Creek / Yellow Pine Travel Plan (Snow-free Season) and Big Creek Ford Project

GREENWOOD VEGETATION MANAGEMENT

Tahoe National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation

Wilderness Specialist s Report

Planning Grazing. Pasture Planning. Fencing for Grazing Systems. High Tensile. High Tensile. High Tensile 3/31/2014. water, and paddocks

DESIGN FEATURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE SELECTED ALTERNATIVE

White Mountain National Forest Androscoggin and Evans Notch Ranger Districts

White Mountain National Forest

TONGASS NATIONAL FOREST

Order of the Minister of Environment #39, August 22, 2011 Tbilisi

Procedure for the Use of Power-Driven Mobility Devices on Mass Audubon Sanctuaries 1 September 17, 2012

Alternative 3 Prohibit Road Construction, Reconstruction, and Timber Harvest Except for Stewardship Purposes B Within Inventoried Roadless Areas

S Central Coast Heritage Protection Act APRIL 21, 2016

Project Planning, Compliance, and Funding

Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District

National Wilderness Steering Committee

Draft Record of Decision

White Mountain National Forest. Campton Day Use Area Development Project. Scoping Report. Prepared by the Pemigewasset Ranger District May 2013

Cascade River State Park Management Plan Amendment

ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL

Office of Commercial Space Transportation: Notice of Availability, Notice of Public

White Mountain National Forest

PURPOSE AND NEED. Introduction

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET

White Mountain National Forest Androscoggin and Evans Notch Ranger Districts

National Forests and Grasslands in Texas

DIRECTOR S ORDER #41: Wilderness Preservation and Management

WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION POLICY/PROCEDURE

Kelly Motorized Trails Project Proposed Action

Limited English Proficiency Plan

Lassen National Forest Over-snow Vehicle Use Designation

Global Sustainable Tourism Destinations Criteria

Draft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

Thank you for this third opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.

Whitefish Range Partnership Tentatively Approved by WRP 11/18/2013!Rec. Wilderness Page 1

Wilderness Process #NP-1810: Your letter ID is NP September 5, 2018

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation December 2, 2004 COYOTE HELLYER COUNTY PARK BAY AREA RIDGE TRAIL

1803 West Hwy 160 Monte Vista, CO (719) TTY (719)

Recreation Opportunity Spectrum for River Management v

Hermosa Area Preservation The Colorado Trail Foundation 4/11/2008

TRAILS WHERE TO FIND TRAILS IN NOVA SCOTIA

Federal Outdoor Recreation Trends Effects on Economic Opportunities

3.12 Roadless Areas and Unroaded Areas

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land

MANAGEMENT DIRECTION STATEMENT June, 1999

Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road

Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. P-308 Proposed Study Plans - Recreation August 2011

Chuckanut Ridge Fairhaven Highlands EIS Scoping Concerns

April 10, Mark Stiles San Juan Public Lands Center Manager 15 Burnett Court Durango, CO Dear Mark,

Public Notice ISSUED: December 10, 2018 EXPIRES: January 9, 2019

Recreation Specialist

Dear Reviewing Officer:

WORKSHEET 1 Wilderness Qualities or Attributes Evaluating the Effects of Project Activities on Wilderness Attributes

Lolo National Forest Plan Amendment #38

Roadless Forest Protection

AMENDMENT NO. 03 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF ADJALA-TOSORONTIO OAK RIDGES MORAINE CONSERVATION PLAN

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

County of Elgin Tourism Signage Policy Addendum A

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Recreation Resources Study Study Plan Section Study Implementation Report

Transcription:

I. DECISION TO BE IMPLEMENTED A. Description of Decision DECISION MEMO For Bullis Hollow Trail USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region 9 Allegheny National Forest Bradford Ranger District Corydon Township McKean County, Pennsylvania My decision is to allow the construction and designation of 8.3 mile pedestrian trail. This project would extend from the eastern termini of FR 173H to the western termini of the Tracy Ridge Trail System Trailhead located on SR 321 near the Tracy Ridge Campground. The proposed trail would link the existing Marilla Springs Trail System (connects to the city of Bradford) to the Tracy Ridge Trail System (connects to the North Country National Scenic Trail). The proposed trail would be located in Corydon Township of McKean County within a former railroad corridor along Railroad Run, North Branch of Sugar Run and Indian Run. (Bullis Hollow Trail location is displayed on the attached map Planning Record 1). Background This project is being proposed by the Tuna Valley Trail Association who formed in 1998 and whose mission is to designate and maintain trails throughout the Tuna Valley, provide accessible recreational opportunities to residents and visitors, and link Tuna Valley Trails with neighboring trail networks and communities. Tuna Valley Trail Association is also part of the McKean County Trail Central tourism marketing brand whose long-term goal for tourism, recreation development and marketing is to connect the recreational assets nearby public lands of the Allegheny National Forest, Kinzua Bridge State Park and Allegeny State Park in New York with the communities that act as their gateways to public lands via trail connections. The proposed project will connect the community of Bradford to the Allegheny National Forest (via the Marilla Springs Trail) and to Allegheny State Park, NY (via the Indian Pipe Trail). B. Purpose of Decision The purpose of this project is to attract visitors to the Allegheny National Forest region through the development of an historic railroad grade into an easily accessible non-motorized recreation trail opportunity. Decision Memo Bullis Hollow Trail Page 1

There is a need to provide outdoor recreation opportunities, such as, this pedestrian trail within the Allegheny National Forest region. There is a need to connect visitors of the Allegheny National Forest to local communities through both pedestrian trails to provide needed services (lodging, food, medical services, etc.) which provides economic benefits to the communities through citizens providing tourism related outdoor recreation services and venues. There is a need to provide non-motorized activities (biking, hiking cross country skiing, wildlife viewing, etc.) to promote the health and well being for trail users. The project meets the needs and goals identified in the 2007 ANF Land and Resource Management Plan (ANF LRMP or Forest Plan). Emphasize the development of mapped, marked, and maintained trail system to minimize user conflicts and impacts to natural resources; respond to changing social needs; and increase access and linkages to communities, forest recreation sites, and special features (ANF LRMP, USDA-Forest Service, 2007, p. 13). Manage the trail system to support a wide variety of recreational opportunities and settings (ANF LRMP, USDA-Forest Service, 2007, p. 13). Maintain or enhance the quality of scenic resources including viewsheds, vistas, overlooks, and special features (ANF LRMP, USDA-Forest Service, 2007, p. 13). Forest infrastructure, including facilities and transportation systems, will provide a safe, efficient, and economical system that is responsive to public and administrative needs; having minimal adverse effects on ecological processes and ecosystem health, diversity, and productivity; and is in balance with needed management actions (ANF LRMP, USDA-Forest Service, 2007, p. 16). II. REASONS FOR CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDING THE DECISION Decisions may be categorically excluded from documentation in an environmental impact statement or environmental assessment when they are within one of the categories identified by the U.S. Department of Agriculture in 7 CFR part 1b.3 or one of the categories identified by the Chief of the Forest Service in Forest Service Handbook (FSH) 1909.15 sections 31.12 or 31.2, and there are no extraordinary circumstances related to the decision that may result in a significant individual or cumulative effect on the quality of the human environment. This project implements the ANF LRMP. As required by NFMA Section 1604(i), I find this project to be consistent with the ANF LRMP. As required by 36 CFR 219.35, I have considered the best available science in making this decision. The project record demonstrates a thorough review and relevant scientific information, consideration of responsible opposing views, and where appropriate, the acknowledgment of incomplete or unavailable information, scientific uncertainty and risk. Decision Memo Bullis Hollow Trail Page 2

I have concluded there are no extraordinary circumstances related to this decision that may result in a significant individual or cumulative effect on the quality of the human environment. My conclusion is based on information presented in this document and the entirety of the record. A. Category of Exclusion The decision is within the category of exclusion identified in Forest Service Handbook (FSH) 1909.15, Chapter 30, 31.2 (l): Construction and reconstruction of trails. B. Relationship of Extraordinary Circumstances The categorical exclusion is appropriate in this situation because there are no extraordinary circumstances potentially having effects which may significantly affect the environment. I considered the following for extraordinary circumstances: 1. Proposed, Threatened, or Endangered Species or their Critical Habitat and Sensitive Species The Endangered Species Act requires that federal activities not jeopardize the continued existence of any species federally listed or proposed as threatened or endangered, or result in adverse modification to such species designated critical habitat. There are no federally designated critical habitats for any Threatened or Endangered species in the project area. Analysis indicates that there will be no effect to any proposed or listed species or their critical habitat. Forest Service Manual 2670 requires analysis of potential impacts to sensitive species; those species for which the Regional Forester has identified population viability is a concern. On November 8, 2006, the Regional Forester approved the updated Regional Forester s Sensitive Species (RFSS) list. Analysis indicates that there will be no impact to any of the RFSS, and this decision will not cause a trend toward federal listing of any of those species. 2. Floodplains, Wetlands, or Municipal Watersheds Floodplains: Executive Order 11988 is meant to avoid adverse impacts associated with the occupancy and modification of floodplains. Floodplains are defined by this order as, the lowland and relatively flat areas that are adjoining inland and coastal waters, including floodprone areas of offshore islands, including at a minimum, that area subject to a one percent [100-year recurrence] or greater chance of flooding in any one year. This decision will not affect floodplains. Decision Memo Bullis Hollow Trail Page 3

Wetlands: Executive Order 11990 is meant to avoid adverse impacts associated with destruction or modification of wetlands. Wetlands are defined by this order as areas inundated by surface or ground water with a frequency sufficient to support and under normal circumstances does or would support a prevalence of vegetative or aquatic life that requires saturated or seasonally saturated soil conditions for growth and reproduction. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas such as sloughs, potholes, wet meadows, river overflows, mud flats, and natural ponds. This decision will not affect wetlands. Municipal Watersheds: Municipal watersheds are managed under multiple use prescriptions in forest plans. Municipal Watersheds on the ANF consist of the Big Mill Creek Ridgway Reservoir and the West Branch Tunaungwant Bradford Reservoirs. This project is located just west of the Bradford Reservoir (Marilla #5). This trail will connect to the Marilla Springs Trail System which is situated on Bradford Watershed land. I believe this decision will enhance the goals of municipal watersheds in that the trail would be constructed and maintained to a minimum standard for protection of water resources. Therefore, this decision would have a positive affect on municipal watersheds. 3. Congressionally Designated Areas Wilderness: Wilderness Areas (Hickory Creek and Allegheny River Islands) are designated as MA 5.1 in the ANF-LRMP (USDA-FS 2007 p. ROD-17, pp. 116 120). This project is not located in or near designated wilderness areas. Therefore, this decision will not affect Congressionally Designated Wilderness Areas. Wilderness Study Areas: Wilderness Study Areas (Chestnut Ridge and Minister Valley) are designated as MA 5.2 in the ANF LRMP (USDA-FS 2007 p. ROD-17-18, pp. 121-125). This project is located within the Chestnut Ridge Wilderness Study Area. ANF LRMP (USDA-FS 2007 p. 123) standards and guidelines specify that trails may be added to protect wilderness values and that trails should be constructed and maintained to a minimum standard for protection of resources. I believe this decision would enhance Wilderness Study Areas in that the trail would be constructed and managed to promote primitive non-motorized wilderness values. Therefore, this decision would have a positive effect on Wilderness Study Areas. National Recreation Areas: National Recreation Areas (NRA Allegheny National Recreation Areas Tracy Ridge, Cornplanter and Allegheny Front) are designated as MA 8.2 in the ANF LRMP, (USDA-FS 2007 p. ROD-18-19, pgs. 148-152. This project connects to the eastern edge of the Tracy Ridge NRA. ANF LRMP (USDA-FS 2007, p. 150) standards and guidelines specify that trail construction and maintenance be at a semi-primitive non- Decision Memo Bullis Hollow Trail Page 4

motorized development level. I believe this decision would complement the NRA designation and the nearby Wilderness Study Area designation. Therefore, this decision would have a positive effect on NRAs. Wild and Scenic Rivers: Wild and Scenic Rivers (Allegheny and Clarion) are designated as MA 8.1 in the ANF LRMP, (USDA-FS 2007 p. ROD-19, pp. 142-147). This project is not located near either river. Therefore, this decision will not affect Wild and Scenic Rivers. Inventoried Roadless Areas: There are seven areas on the maps of record for the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (36 CFR Part 294, 2001). They include ANF LRMP (USDA-FS 2007 p. ROD-19): Tracy Ridge (MA 8.2 NRA), Cornplanter (MA 8.2 NRA), Allegheny Front (MA 8.2 NRA), Verbeck Island (MA 8.1 Wild & Scenic River), Heart s Content (MA 8.3 Scenic Area) and Clarion River (MA 7.2 Remote Recreation Area). This project connects to an Inventoried Roadless Area, the Tracy Ridge NRA. As said above, ANF LRMP (USDA-FS 2007, p. 150) standards and guidelines specify that trail construction and maintenance be at a semi-primitive non-motorized development level. I believe this decision would complement the NRA designation and the nearby Wilderness Study Area designation. Therefore, this decision would positively affect Inventoried Roadless Areas. 4. Research Natural Areas Research Natural Area (Tionesta) is designated as MA 8.5 in the ANF-LRMP (USDA-FS 2007, pp. 161-164). This project area is not located near the Research Natural Area. Therefore, this decision will not affect Research Natural Areas. 5. American Indians and Alaska Natives Religious or Cultural Sites, and Archaeological Sites, or Historic Properties or Areas Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires federal agencies to take into account the effect of a project on any district, site, building, structure, or object that is included in, or eligible for inclusion in the National Register. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act also requires federal agencies to afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation a reasonable opportunity to comment. The Archaeological Resources Protection Act covers the discovery and protection of historic properties (prehistoric and historic) that are excavated or discovered in federal lands. It affords lawful protection of archaeological resources and sites that are on public and Indian lands. The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act cover the discovery and protection of Native American human remains and objects that are excavated or discovered in federal lands. It encourages avoidance of archaeological sites that contain burials or portions of sites that Decision Memo Bullis Hollow Trail Page 5

contain graves through in situ preservation, but may encompass other actions to preserve these remains and items. This decision will not affect American Indians and Alaska Natives Religious or Cultural Sites, and Archaeological Sites, or Historic Properties or Areas. III. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The following methods were used to inform the public of the opportunity to comment on this proposal: 1. The project has been listed on the ANF SOPA (Schedule of Proposed Actions) since April 2011. 2. The project has been available on the ANF website at: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/fsusda-pop.php?project=35400 3. 165 scoping letters (introducing the project and asking for comments) were sent to two mailing lists (NEPA and Pedestrian Trails). Five favorable comments were received. No issues were brought forth through the public involvement process. IV. FINDINGS REQUIRED BY AND/OR RELATED TO OTHER LAWS AND REGULATIONS My decision will comply with all applicable laws and regulations. I have summarized some pertinent ones below. Forest Plan Consistency (National Forest Management Act) This Act requires the development of long-range land and resource management plans. The ANF-LRMP (USDA-FS, 2007) was developed, as required by the Act. The Act requires all projects and activities to be consistent with the ANF-LRMP. The ANF-LRMP has been reviewed in consideration of this project. This decision is responsive to guiding direction contained in the ANF-LRMP. This decision is consistent with the design criteria (standards and guidelines contained in the ANF-LRMP, pp. 53-99). Endangered Species Act See Section II, Item B1 of this document. Sensitive Species (Forest Service Manual 2670) This Manual direction requires analysis of potential impacts to sensitive species, those species for which the Regional Forester has identified population viability is a concern. On the ANF, the Regional Forester approved the Decision Memo Bullis Hollow Trail Page 6

sensitive species list. Potential effects of this decision on sensitive species has been analyzed and documented. This decision will have no impact on sensitive species (see Project File Record II). Clean Water Act The intent of the Act is to restore and maintain the integrity of waters. The Forest Service complies with this Act through the use of Best Management Practices. This decision incorporates Best Management practices to ensure protection of soil and water resources. Wetlands (Executive Order 11990) See Section II, Item B2 of this document. Floodplains (Executive Order 11988) See Section II, Item B2 of this document. Clean Air Act Under this Act, areas of the country were designated as Class I, II, or III attainment areas for Prevention of Significant Deterioration purposes. Class I areas generally include national parks and wilderness areas. Class I provides the most protection to pristine lands by severely limiting the amount of additional human-caused air pollution that can be added to these areas. There are no Class I attainment areas on the ANF. The ANF lies within a Class II attainment area. A greater amount of additional human-caused air pollution may be added to these areas but must still meet Commonwealth and National Air Quality Standards. No areas on the ANF have been designated as Class III attainment areas at this time. Federal Cave Resources Protection Act This Act is to secure, protect, preserve, and maintain significant caves, to the extent practical. Site features and field review substantiate that no caves are in the project areas. No known cave resources will be affected by this decision. National Historic Preservation Act See Section II, Item B5 of this document. Archaeological Resources Protection Act See Section II, Item B5 of this document. Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act See Section II, Item B5 of this document. Environmental Justice (Executive Order 12898) This Order requires consideration of whether projects would disproportionately impact minority or low-income populations. This decision complies with this Act. Public involvement occurred for this project, the results of which I have considered in this decision-making. Public involvement did not identify any adversely impacted local minority or low-income populations. This decision is not expected to adversely impact minority or low-income populations. Decision Memo Bullis Hollow Trail Page 7

National Environmental Policy Act This Act requires public involvement and consideration of potential environmental effects. The entirety of documentation for this decision supports compliance with this Act. V. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OR APPEAL OPPORTUNITIES This decision is not subject to an administrative review or appeal pursuant to 36 CFR 215. VI. IMPLEMENTATION DATE Implementation of this decision may occur immediately. VII. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL AND CONTACT PERSON The Responsible Official is: Macario Herrera, District Ranger USDA-Forest Service Allegheny National Forest 29 Forest Service Drive Bradford, PA 16701 Further information about this decision can be obtained from Julie Moyer during normal office hours (weekdays, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.) at the Bradford Ranger District Office, 29 Forest Service Drive, Bradford, PA 16701, Telephone: voice 814-363-6089, TDD 814-363-8116 (hearing impaired), FAX 814-362-2761, e-mail: jmoyer@fs.fed.us. This document is also listed on the ANF website at: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/fs-usda-pop.php/?project=35400. IV. SIGNATURE AND DATE /s/ Macario Herrera November 29, 2011 MACARIO HERRERA District Ranger Bradford Ranger District Allegheny National Forest Date Decision Memo Bullis Hollow Trail Page 8

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA s target center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326- w, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Decision Memo Bullis Hollow Trail Page 9