CONGESTION REPORT 1 st Quarter 2018

Similar documents
B. Congestion Trends. Congestion Trends

95 Express Lanes: Before/After Study

DISTRICT EXPRESS LANES ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017 JULY 1, 2016 JUNE 30, FloridaExpressLanes.com

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

Appendix 4.1 J. May 17, 2010 Memorandum from CTPS to the Inter Agency Coordinating Group

Transportation Improvement District (TID) Exercise New Castle County Unified Development Code

Word Count: 3,565 Number of Tables: 4 Number of Figures: 6 Number of Photographs: 0. Word Limit: 7,500 Tables/Figures Word Count = 2,250

Research Report Agreement T4118, Task 24 HOV Action Plan HOV ACTION PLAN

TransAction Overview. Introduction. Vision. NVTA Jurisdictions

Freeway Volume-Crash Summary

A retrospective look at work program counting activities since 2001 is found in Table 8, on the last page of this document. Hours of Operation

Arlington County Board Meeting Project Briefing. October 20, 2015

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

HOV LANE PERFORMANCE MONITORING: 2000 REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Operational Performance

NATIONAL TOLL FACILITIES USAGE ANALYSIS RECORD-BREAKING YEAR FOR TOLL FACILITIES ACROSS THE U.S.

Metrobus Service Evaluations

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study

McLean Citizens Association Transportation Committee Project Briefing

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

Watts St westbound thru

Arlington County Board Work Session Eastbound Widening January 17, Amanda Baxter, VDOT Special Projects Development Manager

5.1 Traffic and Transportation

I-66 Inside the Beltway Feasibility Study

Public Information Meetings. October 5, 6, 7, and 15, 2015

95 Express Monthly Operations Report May 2017

CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE. By Mike Curran, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

Washington-Baltimore Regional Airport System Plan Ground Access Element Update

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus

Report to the Strategic Development Committee

Mercer SCOOT Adaptive Signal Control. Karl Typolt, Transpo Group PSRC RTOC July 6th, 2017

NWARPC Congestion Management Process - January 16, 2014

2006 WEEKDAY TRAFFIC PROFILE. June 15, 2007

MEMORANDUM. for HOV Monitoring on I-93 North and the Southeast Expressway, Boston Region MPO, November, 2011.

Study Advisory Committee Meeting No. 2

Public Meeting: Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA) Transportation Network Company (TNC) Lot on S. Eads Street

1.2 Corridor History and Current Characteristics

APPENDIX J MODIFICATIONS PERFORMED TO THE TOR

Evaluation of Significant Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia Transportation District. HB 599 Ratings Overview NVTA - January 22, 2015

Published Counts TrafficMetrix

Understanding Your I-66 Trip

I-93/Southeast Expressway/Route 3 (Braintree Split)

Elected Officials and Media Briefing I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension

Connecting Transportation and Economic Growth in Metropolitan Washington

3 ASSESSMENT OF THE CORRIDOR

95 Express Monthly Operations Report July 2017

Metro ExpressLanes April 5, 2011 Community Meeting re: Adams Blvd Improvements

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

A Tour Across America s Managed Lanes Mike Heiligenstein, Executive Director Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority

Transform66 Transportation Management Plan: Transit & TDM Strategies

Fairfax County Transportation Advisory Commission (TAC)

BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN COUNT PROGRAM 2016 Annual Report

National Rail Performance Report - Quarter /14

Northern Virginia District State of the District. Helen L. Cuervo, P.E. District Engineer October 18, 2017

I-405 Express Toll Lanes Coming in 2015

Transit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007)

5.0 REGIONAL ANALYSIS

GREENBELT-BWI THURGOOD MARSHALL AIRPORT EXPRESS LINE ROUTE B30

ROUTE EVALUATION ROUTE 21 Denton County Transportation Authority

Summary of Proposed NH 120 Service

EXHIBIT MAXIMUM ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC REPORTED ON SELECTED INTERSTATE ROUTES (1990)

Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC

ROUTE 630 DIVERGING DIAMOND INTERCHANGE

CTPS staff considered roadways that carry on average more than 1,500 weekday MBTA bus passengers in one direction as candidates for dedicated bus

CALIFORNIA HIGH-OCCUPANCY VEHICLE LANE DEGRADATION ACTION PLAN

Follow-up to Proposed Fare Changes for FY2013

Construction Staging Adelaide Street West

Toronto 2015 Pan Am/Parapan Am Games Temporary Traffic By-law Amendments for High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes (Supplementary Report)

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1 P age

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

Mainline Description

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

Performance Measure Summary

TMC Monthly Operational Summary

Evaluation of Significant Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia Transportation District

Transform66: Inside the Beltway

A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS

Minutes of the Third Meeting THE WASHINGTON COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE

%g 109 %g 9. %g 99. %g 9. %g 4. %g 4 %g ,95 (/ 1. Route 109 Corridor Study. %g 35. Corridor Study Area Study Area. Sanford.

2017/2018 Q3 Performance Measures Report. Revised March 22, 2018 Average Daily Boardings Comparison Chart, Page 11 Q3 Boardings figures revised

INTERSTATE 10 AND INTERSTATE 17 SPINE WORKSHOP

rtc transit Before and After Studies for RTC Transit Boulder highway UPWP TASK Before Conditions

What We ve Learned About Highway Congestion

REPORT TO THE STRATEGIC PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

About This Report GAUGE INDICATOR. Red. Orange. Green. Gold

Transit Fare Review Phase 2 Discussion Guide

DRAFT Service Implementation Plan

Fewer air traffic delays in the summer of 2001

VCTC Transit Ridership and Performance Measures Quarterly Report

Our Panelists SPEAKERS MODERATOR

Eleven things you should know about the carpool lanes in Los Angeles County.

Background Information about the H Lines Evaluation

APPENDIX D MSP Airfield Simulation Analysis

Report to the Dulles Corridor Advisory Committee

FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY, 2007 UPDATE. Prepared for International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions Alexandria, Virginia

Update on the I-680 Transit Corridor Improvement Project HOV on/off Ramps Environmental Impact Report Community Engagement Plan

Directions to the MITRE Facility in McLean, Virginia:

East Link Project Update. Maintenance of Traffic During Construction. April 21, 2015

Transcription:

CONGESTION REPORT 1 st Quarter 2018 A quarterly update of the National Capital Region s traffic congestion, travel time reliability, top-10 bottlenecks and featured spotlight Feburary 11, 2019

ABOUT TPB Transportation planning at the regional level is coordinated in the Washington area by the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (TPB). Members of the TPB include representatives of the transportation agencies of the states of Maryland and Virginia, and the District of Columbia, local governments, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, the Maryland and Virginia General Assemblies, and nonvoting members from the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority and federal agencies. The TPB is staffed by the Department of Transportation Planning of the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. CREDITS Author: Jan-Mou Li, Daivamani Sivasailam Project Management: Andrew J. Meese Oversight: Kanti Srikanth Data/Tools: I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project; INRIX, Inc.; CATT Lab of University of Maryland ACCOMMODATIONS Alternative formats of this document are available upon request; visit www.mwcog.org/accommodations or call (202) 962-3300 or (202) 962-3213 (TDD). Copyright 2016 by the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

CONGESTION REPORT 1 st Quarter 2018 Table of Contents 2 CONGESTION TRAVEL TIME INDEX (TTI) 3 RELIABILITY PLANNING TIME INDEX (PTI) 4 TOP 10 BOTTLENECKS 10 CONGESTION MAPS 12 2018Q1 SPOTLIGHT A PRATICE TO REDUCE COST OF CRASH 1

CONGESTION TRAVEL TIME INDEX (TTI) Interstate System Non-Interstate NHS 3 TTI 1 st Quarter 2018: 1.30 0.5% or 0.007 1 TTI 1 st Quarter 2018: 1.18 1.2% or -0.015 TTI Trailing 4 Quarters: 1.36 0.2% or 0.003 2 TTI Trailing 4 Quarters: 1.19 0.6% or -0.008 Transit-Significant 4 All Roads TTI 1 st Quarter 2018: 1.19 1.3% or -0.016 TTI 1 st Quarter 2018: 1.15 1.1% or -0.013 TTI Trailing 4 Quarters: 1.20 0.8% or -0.01 TTI Trailing 4 Quarters: 1.17 0.4% or -0.01 1 Compared to 1 st Quarter 2017; 2 Compared to one year earlier; 3 NHS: National Highway System; 4 See Background section. Figure 1 Monthly Travel Time Index for Total AM peak (6:00-10:00 am) and PM peak (3:00-7:00 pm) Travel Time Index (TTI), defined as the ratio of actual travel time to free-flow travel time, measures the intensity of congestion. The higher the index, the more congested traffic conditions it represents, e.g., TTI = 1.00 means free flow conditions, while TTI = 1.30 indicates the actual travel time is 30% longer than the free-flow travel time. 2

RELIABILITY PLANNING TIME INDEX (PTI) Interstate System Non-Interstate NHS 3 PTI 1 st Quarter 2018: 1.76 0.1% or -0.002 1 PTI 1 st Quarter 2018: 1.41 2.3% or -0.033 PTI Trailing 4 Quarters: 1.87 0.7% or -0.013 2 PTI Trailing 4 Quarters: 1.44 0.9% or -0.013 Transit-Significant 4 All Roads PTI 1 st Quarter 2018: 1.42 2.1% or -0.031 PTI 1 st Quarter 2018: 1.36 1.6% or -0.022 PTI Trailing 4 Quarters: 1.45 1.0% or -0.01 PTI Trailing 4 Quarters: 1.39 0.6% or -0.008 1 Compared to 1 st Quarter 2017; 2 Compared to one year earlier; 3 NHS: National Highway System; 4 See Background section. Figure 2 Monthly Planning Time Index for Total AM peak (6:00-10:00 am) and PM peak (3:00-7:00 pm) Planning Time Index (PTI), defined as the ratio of 95th percentile travel time to free flow travel time, measures travel time reliability. The higher the index, the less reliable traffic conditions it represents, e.g., PTI = 1.30 means a traveler must budget 30% longer than the uncongested travel time to arrive on time 95% of the instances (i.e., 19 out of 20 trips). 3

TOP 10 BOTTLENECKS Rank (Last Quarter Rank) Location Average duration Average max length (miles) Total duration Impact factor 1 (1) * I-95 S @ VA-123/EXIT 160 6 h 35 m 3.65 24 d 17 h 34 m 122,631.68 2 (3) I-495 CCW @ MD-97/GEORGIA 3 h 34 m 2.8 13 d 08 h 56 m 67,835.64 AVE/EXIT 31 3 (4) BALTIMORE WASHINGTON PARKWAY 5 h 13 m 2.79 19 d 13 h 27 m 66,242.78 @ POWDER MILL RD 4 (5) DC-295 S @ EAST CAPITOL ST 8 h 50 m 1.19 33 d 03 h 48 m 64,737.05 5 (2) I-495 CW @ I-270 SPUR 2 h 27 m 4.01 9 d 04 h 45 m 64,051.81 6 (9) US-1 S @ OPITZ BLVD 5 h 41 m 2.3 21 d 08 h 43 m 60,765.46 7 (7) I-95 N @ VA-123/EXIT 160 3 h 10 m 3.08 11 d 21 h 40 m 56,037.28 8 (8) BALTIMORE WASHINGTON PARKWAY 3 h 22 m 3 12 d 15 h 45 m 51,728.65 @ I-495/I-95 9 (6) I-66 E @ SYCAMORE ST/EXIT 69 4 h 50 m 1.75 18 d 03 h 39 m 49,269.14 10 (18) MD-5 S @ MD-381/BRANDYWINE RD 9 h 38 m 0.62 36 d 04 h 00 m 46,883.59 * See Bottlenecks section in the Background chapter for ranking variability from quarter to quarter. 4

Average Average max Rank Location Total duration Impact factor* duration length (miles) I-95 S @ VA- 7 h 24 m 3.95 28 d 10 h 18 m 145,274.09 1 123/EXIT 160 * The Impact Factor of a bottleneck is simply the product of the Average Duration (minutes), Average Max Length (miles) and the number of occurrences. 1 Rank 2 Location I-495 CW @ I-270 SPUR Average Average max Total duration Impact factor duration length (miles) 2 h 34 m 4.46 9 d 20 h 26 m 88,898.23 2 5

Rank 3 Location I-495 CCW @ MD- 97/GEORGIA AVE/EXIT 31 Average Average max Total duration Impact factor duration length (miles) 4 h 22 m 2.67 16 d 18 h 04 m 82,678.58 3 Rank 4 Location BALTIMORE WASHINGTON PARKWAY @ POWDER MILL RD Average duration Average max length (miles) Total duration 5 h 58 m 2.81 22 d 22 h 13 m Impact factor 73,249.20 4 6

Rank 5 Location DC-295 S @ EAST CAPITOL ST Average Average max Total duration Impact factor duration length (miles) 9 h 35 m 1.24 36 d 19 h 07 m 71,440.03 5 Rank 6 Location I-66 E @ SYCAMORE ST/EXIT 69 Average Average max duration length (miles) Total duration 6 h 22 m 1.81 24 d 10 h 29 m Impact factor 70,900.03 6 7

Rank 7 Location I-95 N @ VA-123/EXIT 160 Average Average max Total duration Impact factor duration length (miles) 3 h 25 m 3.32 13 d 02 h 42 m 68,786.91 7 Rank 8 Location BALTIMORE WASHINGTON PARKWAY @ I- 495/I-95 Average Average max Total duration Impact factor duration length (miles) 4 h 07 m 3.14 15 d 20 h 21 m 66,618.89 8 8

Rank Location Average Average max Total duration Impact factor duration length (miles) 9 US-1 S @ OPITZ BLVD 5 h 45 m 2.36 22 d 01 h 59 m 64,835.54 9 Rank 10 Location I-66 W @ VADEN DR/EXIT 62 Average Average max Total duration Impact factor duration length (miles) 4 h 22 m 1.67 16 d 18 h 05 m 60,747.47 10 9

CONGESTION MAPS Figure 3. Travel Time Index during weekday 8: 00-9:00 A.M. in 1 st Quarter of 2018 10

Figure 4. Travel Time Index during weekday 5:00-6:00 P.M. in 1 st Quarter of 2018 11

2018Q1 SPOTLIGHT A PRATICE TO REDUCE COST OF CRASH Introduction Traffic congestion cost the nation $305 billion in 2017, according the transportation data firm INRIX. About half of congestion is estimated to be caused by temporary disruptions that take away part of the roadway from use or "nonrecurring" congestion. Traffic incidents alone, the major cause of nonrecurring congestion, account for about a quarter of congestion. A nationwide estimate was about $76 billion in terms congestion costs in 2017. This spotlight reviewed a crash in a major commute corridor of the National Capital Region and analyzed what it cost in terms of speed, travel time index, planning time index, and monetary estimations. With coordinated multi-disciplinary Traffic Incident Management (TIM) practices and MATOC playing a role, traffic flow was restored within two hours after the complicated crash. A crash on I-270 Around 5:18 a.m. on Monday March 19, 2018, an unidentified white tractor-trailer made an unsafe lane change that triggered a morning crash on southbound Interstate 270 in Germantown (Montgomery County), shutting it down and snarling the morning commute for hours. The crash involved 20 vehicles along with a tractor trailer that spilled its load of rock and gravel onto the roadway. All southbound lanes of Interstate 270 were closed due to the crash for about two hours. Cost analysis on the I-270 crash Vehicle speed, in terms of how much time was needed to travel a certain road segment, can be a straightforward measure to the cost analysis. Figure 5 shows average speed distribution at the studied segment, between MD-124/Quince Orchard Rd/Exit 11 and MD-121 of I-270, on March 19, 2018. Average speed distribution for southbound traffic is shown on the left of Figure 5 and on the right represented the distribution for northbound traffic. Perhaps because of the crash, there was no data reported in the black mesh area of Figure 5. The location and duration of the crash have been marked on Figure 5 with the red diamond and the associated black horizontal line. The dark red area on the map represents that average speed was less than 10 miles per hour; and the green indicates that average speed was greater than 50 miles per hour. 12

Figure 5 Speed distribution in the I-270 segments SB I-270 is typically congested during the AM peak period and the incident exasperated the congestion. Figure 6 shows a comparison of hourly average speed (HAS) on March 19, 2018 (southbound in Red and northbound in dark blue) versus all weekdays in the 1 st quarter of 2018 (southbound in Orange and northbound in light blue). The most congested time, i.e. with the lowest HAS, in the studied segment happened around 7 a.m. The HAS at 7 a.m. on March 19, 2018 (red line in Figure 6) was 24.28 mile per hour that is about 36 percent slower than the average over all weekdays in the 1 st quarter of 2018 (orange line in Figure 6) at the same time. However, traffic was almost back to normal in terms of HAS after 8 a.m. on March 19, 2018. Figure 6 Hourly average speed at the I-270 segments on March 19 and average weekdays in the 1st quarter of 2018 13

Since southbound I-270 was completely shut down due to the crash, impacts on the parallel surface street, MD-355 in this case, were significant. Figure 7 shows a comparison of HAS on March 19, 2018 (southbound in red and northbound in dark blue) versus all weekdays in the 1 st quarter of 2018 (southbound in orange and northbound in light blue). During a regular weekday in the first quarter of 2018, variation of the HAS in the MD-355 southbound segment was insignificant, especially after 7 a.m. However, the shut-down in I-270 southbound resulted a 66% decrease of HAS in the southbound of MD-355 at 7 a.m., from 30 miles per hour to 10 miles per hour. The HAS in MD- 355 southbound went back to normal around 10 a.m., suggesting that the shut-down brought longerlasting impact on the surface street than on the interstate. Figure 7 Hourly average speed at the MD-355 segments on March 19 and average weekdays in the 1st quarter of 2018 Travel Time Index (TTI) can be used to measure how intense a congestion situation was. The higher the TTI, the more congested traffic condition it represents, e.g., TTI = 1.00 means free flow conditions, while TTI = 1.30 indicates the actual travel time is 30% longer than the free-flow travel time. The TTI of I-270 southbound around 7 a.m. on March 19, 2018 shown in Figure 8 (red line) suggested that the crash resulted almost five times (491%) longer of travel time than what it took under free-flow conditions. In comparison to regular weekday traffic in the 1 st quarter of 2018, expected travel time would be about 60% longer than what it took under free-flow conditions on the same segment. 14

Figure 8 TTI at the I-270 segments on March 19 and average weekdays in the 1st quarter of 2018 The TTI on the parallel surface street MD-355 also increased, but by less magnitude than on I-270. The TTI (orange line in Figure 9) was 1.13 at 7 a.m. for an average weekday of 2018 1 st quarter in the southbound of MD-355. The shut-down raised travel time in the southbound MD-355 (red line in Figure 9) to two times (191%) longer than its regular congested condition. Figure 9 TTI at the MD-355 segments on March 19 and average weekdays in the 1st quarter of 2018 15

Planning Time Index (PTI) can be used to estimate reliability of expected travel time. The higher the PTI, the less reliable traffic conditions it represents, e.g., PTI = 1.30 means a traveler must budget 30% more time than the uncongested travel time to arrive on time 95% of the instances (i.e., 19 out of 20 trips). On the day of the crash commuters would not have reached their destination unless they allowed a cushion of 3 times (314%) above their normal congested travel time. Figure 10 PTI at the I-270 segments on March 19 and average weekdays in the 1st quarter of 2018 In comparison to I-270, PTI in the southbound MD-355 at 7 a.m. increased to 4.25 (red line in Figure 11 representing the crash day) from 1.68 (orange line in Figure 11 representing average weekday of 2018 1 st quarter), a 153% increase. Figure 11 PTI at the MD-355 segments on March 19 and average weekdays in 2018 1 st quarter 16

In terms of monetary user delay cost (MUDC), hourly totals in the 1 st quarter of 2018 are shown in Figure 9 with orange bars. The blue columns in the figure represent the percentage of hourly totals in the 1 st quarter that resulted from the crash. It suggested that the crash contributed 65% of hourly totals ($8.4K) in the 1st quarter of 2018 at five o clock in the morning. The percentage is high because between 5 and 6 a.m. at the studied segment was not usually congested. Within the recurring congested periods, i.e. from 6 a.m. to 10 a.m., impacts of the crash on the quarter s hourly MUDC reduced to 10% ($112.1K), 5%($234.1K), 5%($232.3K), and 3%($120.4K) respectively. Please be advised that the MUDC takes only user delay into consideration, no injury, property damage, or emergency operations were counted into the estimation. Figure 12 Hourly Monetary User Delay Cost in the 1st quarter of 2018 and the percentage costed by the crash on March 19, 2018 Summary Any major incident will cause delay and cost to the travelling public, but programs in place such as MATOC, TIM training for the first responders, better communication among responders, and better information to the travelling public to avoid the area helps in reducing the impact. The region convened a task force to study ways to improve TIM response, with recommendations delivered to the COG board, and shared with other stakeholders, in late 2018. 17

777 North Capitol Street NE, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20002 www.mwcog.org