WAKE VORTEX MEASUREMENTS TO SUPPORT SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF THE SIMULTANEOUS OFFSET INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE AT SFO

Similar documents
USA Near-Term Progress for Closely Spaced Parallel Runways

Wake Vortex R&D. Status Briefing. NBAA Convention. Federal Aviation Administration. By: Steve Lang Date: September 2007

Application of Wake Turbulence Separation at London Heathrow. Paul Johnson Development Manager NATS Heathrow

Crosswind dependent separations and update on TBS concept (transitional step)

Navigation - Runways. Chap 2, Nolan

FAA Progress on Wake Avoidance Solutions for Closely Spaced Parallel Runways (CSPR)

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

Outmaneuvered AIRFLOW

WAKE TURBULENCE SEPARATION MINIMA

ATC-Wake: Integrated Air Traffic Control Wake Vortex Safety and Capacity System

Helicopter OPS as follower & WTS (we need clarity)

Comparative wake-turbulence assessments and findings for the B747-8

REPORT IN-038/2010 DATA SUMMARY

Overview of active wake vortex concepts in Europe

Prediction of Dynamic Pairwise Wake Vortex Separations for Approach and Landing the WSVBS

Crosswind-based wake avoidance system approved by the FAA for operational use. Clark Lunsford (MITRE) & Dr. Edward Johnson May 15-16, 2013

SAFE WINGS. This issue WAKE-UP TO WAKE TURBULENCE. * For Internal Circulation Only

BACKGROUND ON SAFETY STATISTICS

Enhanced Time Based Separation (ETBS) & RECAT EU. Heathrow Crew Briefing

Piper Arrow PA 28 RT-201T (Turbo) - Checkout Sheet

LAPL(A)/PPL(A) question bank FCL.215, FCL.120 Rev OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES 070

2. CANCELLATION. AC 90-23F, Aircraft Wake Turbulence, dated February 20, 2002, is canceled.

Worst-case analysis of wake vortex induced risk of 700ft vertical separation. Gerben van Baren

KSFO RNAV TO GLS DEMONSTRATION

Wake Turbulence Standards

ALPA PROVIDES INPUT ON WAKE TURBULENCE.

LAPL(A)/PPL(A) question bank FCL.215, FCL.120 Rev OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES 070

Current practice of separation delivery at major European airports ATM R&D Seminar, June 2015, Lisbon

SAFETYSENSE LEAFLET 15c WAKE VORTEX

Wake Encounter In-Situ Flight Tests in Cruise - Wake Characterization

The Development of Wake Turbulence Recategorization in the United States

CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA

4. Serrated Trailing Edge Blade Designs and Tunnel Configuration

Source: Chippewa Valley Regional Airport ASOS, Period of Record

Section 3. Wake Turbulence

CATCODE ] CATCODE

ASSEMBLY 37TH SESSION

Technical Report. Aircraft Noise Analysis. Portola Valley and Woodside, California. July Prepared by: Aircraft Noise Abatement Office

Terminal- Area Opera.ons Prof. Hamsa Balakrishnan

DIRECCION DE PERSONAL AERONAUTICO DPTO. DE INSTRUCCION PREGUNTAS Y OPCIONES POR TEMA

Airfield Capacity Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Pre-solo Written Exam

ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF WIND DEPENDENT PARALLEL ARRIVAL OPERATIONS

Wake Turbulence All aircraft produce wake turbulence, which consists of wake vortices formed any time an airfoil is producing lift.

S2 Tower Controller. Allama Iqbal Int l Airport Lahore ( OPLA ) June 2016 Pakistan vacc

Technical Report. Aircraft Overflight and Noise Analysis. Brisbane, California. December Prepared by:

Potential benefits in the application of Time Based Separation concept at Lisbon Airport

Pre-Solo and BFR Written

LFMN / Nice Côte-d Azur / NCE

Cessna 150 (N6332G) Pre-Solo Written Exam

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

Research and Innovation Management. HALS / DTOP High Approach Landing System / Dual Threshold Operation

Wake Turbulence Research Modeling

Effective: AIRCRAFT WAKE TURBULENCE

BFC KNOWLEDGE TEST. 4. What are wing-tip vortices (wake turbulence)? With which aircraft are they the greatest? Describe proper avoidance?

Wake Turbulence Recategorization (RECAT) ATC Human Factors Issues During Implementation. Terminal Services

Dubai contest LIDAR in Dubai DANS Wake Vortex campaign DXB Operations Dependent Diagonal Approach implementation Phase RPAT Approach concept

Aeronautical Knowledge Written Exam Tecnam Bravo

Runway Incursions 3 Markings

Part 137. Agricultural Aircraft Operations. CAA Consolidation. 10 March Published by the Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand

Lessons Learnt From The EUROCONTROL Wake Impact Severity Assessment Flight Simulator Campaign

WATTS ANTENNA COMPANY

Flight Testing the Wake Encounter Avoidance and Advisory system: First results

Wake Turbulence: Managing Safety and Capacity. Bram Elsenaar co-ordinator of the European Thematic Network WakeNet2-Europe

Pre-solo Written Exam

IFR SEPARATION USING RADAR

AIRMAN S INFORMATION MANUAL. Enroute

FAA RECAT Phase I Operational Experience

6.0 JET ENGINE WAKE AND NOISE DATA. 6.2 Airport and Community Noise

AIRCRAFT NOISE INFORMATION PACK: CANNING VALE

WakeNet3-Europe Concepts Workshop

Challenges in Complex Procedure Design Validation

Diamond Star DA40 Pre-Solo Written Exam

USE OF ADS-B AND PERSPECTIVE DISPLAYS TO ENHANCE AIRPORT CAPACITY

Airport capacity effects of RECAT or: An airport view on RECAT

EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION

NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES

DA Aircraft Specifications and Limitations

USE OF 3D GIS IN ANALYSIS OF AIRSPACE OBSTRUCTIONS

SULAYMANIYAH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MATS CHAPTER 11

SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

Pre-solo Written Exam

Evidence for the Safety- Capacity Trade-Off in the Air Transportation System

Key Purpose & Need Issues

CEE Quick Overview of Aircraft Classifications. January 2018

HEATHROW COMMUNITY NOISE FORUM

To optimize Wake Vortex separations. Fabrice ORLANDI THALES AIR SYSTEMS

6.0 JET ENGINE WAKE AND NOISE DATA. 6.2 Airport and Community Noise

March 2016 Safety Meeting

TRAVIS AIRSPACE. For more information visit the Travis AFB Midair Collision Avoidance (MACA) public website at:

1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION

Federal Aviation Administration Portfolio for Safety Research and Development. Seminar Paul Krois October, 2008

SITE ELEVATION AMSL...Ground Elevation in feet AMSL STRUCTURE HEIGHT...Height Above Ground Level OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL...Total Overall Height AMSL

Airplane takeoff speeds are designed to ensure the liftoff speed does not exceed the tire speed rating.

Wake Turbulence Evolution in the United States

SBAS as a solution for safe approaches in New Zealand and Australia

The Departure Regulator: A Working Paper

IFR SEPARATION WITHOUT RADAR

AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN FOR FRIEDMAN MEMORIAL REPLACEMENT AIRPORT - SITE 12 FRIEDMAN MEMORIAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY INDEX OF SHEETS SHEET TITLE

WAKE TURBULENCE MITIGATION FOR ARRIVALS (WTMA)

Transcription:

WAKE VORTEX MEASUREMENTS TO SUPPORT SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF THE SIMULTANEOUS OFFSET INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE AT SFO James N. Hallock WAKENET2 - EUROPE Frank Y. Wang November 30, 2004 George C. Greene

AERIAL VIEW OF THE SFO PARALLEL RUNWAYS 1L 28R 28L 1R

SCHEMATIC TOP VIEW OF THE SOIA PROCEDURE AT SFO

(Left) Close-up view of windline 1 showing the 3- foot high poles and the propeller anemometer on top of each pole. (Right) B-777 aircraft landing over windline 1

28L 28R RELEVANT DIMENSIONS BETWEEN RUNWAYS 28L AND 28R AS WELL AS POSITIONS OF THE THREE WINDLINES RELATIVE TO THE RUNWAYS 750 ft 675 ft 675 ft 10L 10R WL3 WL2 WL1 1250 ft 750ft 500 ft 280 ft

140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 43,755 SFO LANDINGS BY AIRCRAFT TYPE FOR WHICH THERE IS WAKE VORTEX DATA AT WINDLINE 1 Heavy Aircraft B757 Aircraft Large Aircraft Small Aircraft Unknown Aircraft 119,411 73,431 48,038 37,894 25,363 2,336 9,982 12,318 635 542 1,3761,4761,5122,995 12,081 371 481 1,0411,2401,626 3,131 6,740 18,638 14,770 Misc. Small E120 Total Small Misc. Large DC9 MD90 CARJ GLF B72 MD8 A319-321 B73 Total Large B75 Misc. Heavy A30 MD11 L101 A34 DC10 B77 B74 B76 Total Heavy Unknowns Number of Landings With Vortex Data

Measurements of the maximum lateral travel distance of vortex wakes at SFO from 102,655 landing Large aircraft with crosswinds from -10 to 10 kt and all headwinds. The plots show the fraction of vortices exceeding a given lateral travel within 28 seconds after passage of the aircraft over windline 1

Measurements of the maximum lateral travel distance of vortex wakes at SFO from 33,586 landing B-757 aircraft with crosswinds from -10 to 10 kt and all headwinds. The plots show the fraction of vortices exceeding a given lateral travel within 28 seconds after passage of the aircraft over windline 1

Measurements of the maximum lateral travel distance of vortex wakes at SFO from 42,223 landing Heavy aircraft with crosswinds from -10 to 10 kt and all headwinds. The plots show the fraction of vortices exceeding a given lateral travel distance within 28 seconds after passage of the aircraft over windline 1

Percent of landings with a vortex exceeding 750 feet lateral transport distance vs. the time after landing for Large category aircraft (dotted line), B-757 aircraft (dashed line), and Heavy category aircraft (solid line) Percent of Landings with a Vortex Exceeding 750 ft Lateral Transport, +- 10 kt Crosswind 1.2% 1.0% 0.8% 0.6% 0.4% 0.2% Percent of Landings With a Vortex Exceeding 750 ft Lateral Transport, +- 10 kt Crosswind Heavy aircraft, 42,223 landings B-757 aircraft, 33,586 landings Large aircraft, 102,655 landings 0.0% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time After Aircraft Passage Over Wind Line (sec)

Median lateral transport (solid line) and 1stpercentile and 99th-percentile (dotted lines) for Large category aircraft vs. crosswind for all headwinds at a time of 28 seconds after the passage of the aircraft over windline 1

Median lateral transport (solid line) and 1stpercentile and 99th-percentile (dotted lines) for B-757 aircraft vs. crosswind for all headwinds at a time of 28 seconds after the passage of the aircraft over windline 1

Median lateral transport (solid line) and 1stpercentile and 99th-percentile (dotted lines) for Heavy category aircraft vs. crosswind for all headwinds at a time of 28 seconds after the passage of the aircraft over windline 1

Median lateral transport (solid line) and 1stpercentile and 99th-percentile (dotted lines) for Large category aircraft vs. crosswind for all headwinds at a time of 28 seconds after the passage of the aircraft over windline 1 (blue) and with no time limit after the passage of the aircraft over windline 1 (red)

Measurements of the crosswind component of the wind measured by the pulsed lidar (horizontal axis) vs. the lateral transport velocity of the vortex wakes measured by the lidar (vertical axis)

Lidar data showing the location of wake vortices 28 seconds after initial detection from Large aircraft landing on Runway 28R. The centerline of Runway 28L is located at -750 feet 100 SFO Lidar Data of Vortices From Planes Landing on 28R: Originating in box around GS within 5-sec Vertical Position Below Glide Slope (ft) 50 0-50 -100-150 -200-250 -300-350 28L Large aircraft wakes 28R -1000-800 -600-400 -200 0 200 Lateral Position from 28R (ft)

Lidar data showing the location of wake vortices 28 seconds after initial detection from Large aircraft landing on Runway 28L. The centerline of Runway 28R is located at 750 feet 100 SFO Lidar Data of Vortices From Planes Landing on 28L: Originating in box around GS within 5-sec Vertical Position Below Glide Slope (ft) 50 0-50 -100-150 -200-250 -300-350 28L Large aircraft wakes 28R -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Lateral Position from 28L (ft)

100 Lidar data showing the location of wake vortices 28 seconds after initial detection from B-757 aircraft landing on Runway 28R. The centerline of Runway 28L is located at -750 feet SFO Lidar Data of Vortices From Planes Landing on 28R: Originating in box around GS within 5-sec Vertical Position Below Glide Slope (ft) 50 0-50 -100-150 -200-250 -300-350 28L B-757 aircraft wakes 28R -1000-800 -600-400 -200 0 200 Lateral Position from 28R (ft)

Lidar data showing the location of wake vortices 28 seconds after initial detection from B-757 aircraft landing on Runway 28L. The centerline of Runway 28R is located at 750 feet 100 SFO Lidar Data of Vortices From Planes Landing on 28L: Originating in box around GS within 5-sec Vertical Position Below Glide Slope (ft) 50 0-50 -100-150 -200-250 -300-350 28L B-757 aircraft wakes 28R -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Lateral Position from 28L (ft)

Lidar data showing the location of wake vortices 28 seconds after initial detection from Heavy aircraft landing on Runway 28R. The centerline of Runway 28L is located at -750 feet 100 SFO Lidar Data of Vortices From Planes Landing on 28R: Originating in box around GS within 5-sec Vertical Position Below Glide Slope (ft) 50 0-50 -100-150 -200-250 -300-350 28L Heavy aircraft wakes 28R -1000-800 -600-400 -200 0 200 Lateral Position from 28R (ft)

Lidar data showing the location of wake vortices 28 seconds after initial detection from Heavy aircraft landing on Runway 28L. The centerline of Runway 28R is located at 750 feet 100 SFO Lidar Data of Vortices From Planes Landing on 28L: Originating in box around GS within 5-sec Vertical Position Below Glide Slope (ft) 50 0-50 -100-150 -200-250 -300-350 28L Heavy aircraft wakes 28R -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Lateral Position from 28L (ft)

SUMMARY REPORT Summary Results from Long-Term Wake Turbulence Measurements at San Francisco International Airport J. N. Hallock and F. Y. Wang DOT-VNTSC-FA27-PM-04-13