Boeing Aircraft and the Impact on Airports

Similar documents
Airport Compatibility Brochure 737 MAX

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

Airport Compatibility Brochure 737 MAX. March 2014 PRELIMINARY

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

Airport Compatibility

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

Boeing Airplane Overview

The offers operators increased capacity while taking advantage of existing airport infrastructure. aero quarterly qtr_03 10

Manufacturer s Perspective- Airport Pavement Needs and Maintenance Issues

Airport Compatibility

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

737 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning

Bearing Strength Assessment PLR & PCN

PCN Reporting- Current Problems and Future Research Plans

The Aircraft Classification Rating Pavement Classification Rating ACR-PCR

/300 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning

/300 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning

Tires Versus Pavement: Pilots, mechanics, and airport managers on the same page

Assignment 3: Runway Length and EMAS Design. Aircraft Engine Remarks. CFM56-7B20/-7B22/-7B24 developing 20,000 lb of thrust at sea level

COMFAA. Acknowledgments. Demonstration and. Rapol, FAA. Ken DeBord and Mike Roginski, Boeing Commercial Airplane Co. Federal Aviation Administration

777-9 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport

Program Update Dan Cohen-Nir - Airbus Americas

Boeing Product Update

737 MAX Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning

Budapest, Hungary 2015

Taxiway Pavement Evaluation to Support the Operational of Terminal 2 Juanda Airport

767 Airplane Characteristics for. Airport Planning. Boeing Commercial Airplanes. D SEPTEMBER 2005 i

Advisory Circular (AC)

USE OF TAKEOFF CHARTS [B737]

Airplane Performance. Introduction. Copyright 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved.

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Related content PAPER OPEN ACCESS

717 Aeroplane JAA Data Sheet

CEE Quick Overview of Aircraft Classifications. January 2018

Airfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

Airport/Aircraft Compatibility Challenges on the Apron

Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc

TAKEOFF SAFETY ISSUE 2-11/2001. Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance

Airfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni

2.1 General Characteristics. 2.2 General Dimensions. 2.3 Ground Clearances. 2.4 Interior Arrangements. 2.5 Cabin Cross Sections

The Boeing Next-Generation 737 Family Productive, Progressive, Flexible, Familiar

FOR. Boeing Commercial Airplanes

Demonstration and. 4. Contact List. Federal Aviation Administration. Administration

ADVISORY CIRCULAR ON CALCULATION OF DECLARED DISTANCES

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

Assignment 2: Runway Length Analysis

CATCODE ] CATCODE

Pavement Strength Analysis Prepared by Molzen Corbin September 2016

Chapter 14. Design of Flexible Airport Pavements AC 150/5320-6D

Conference JERI Agressivité du trafic pour les chaussées, les atterrisseurs d avions. FABRE CYRIL, Head of Airfield Pavement November 2017

Airport Obstruction Standards

/-400ER Freighters

Aircraft Classifications. Dr. Antonio Trani and Julio Roa Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

AIRPORT PAVEMENT DESIGNS Consideration of New Guidelines

Flexible Pavement Design

Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Spring 2015 Blacksburg, Virginia

APPENDIX X: RUNWAY LENGTH ANALYSIS

INCREASING AIRPORT OPERATION SAFETY BASED ON UPDATED OR ENHANCED AIRPORT PAVEMENT MARKINGS: A CASE STUDY PAPER

B GEORGIA INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD AVIATION RECOMMENDATIONS DEFINITION OF THE ISSUE. Plan and Fund for the Future:

CEE 5614 and CEE Aircraft Classifications. Spring 2013

Airplane takeoff speeds are designed to ensure the liftoff speed does not exceed the tire speed rating.

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

REPORT IN-038/2010 DATA SUMMARY

Special Conditions: The Boeing Company Model and Airplanes;

CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

PROPOSED HORIZONTAL LAYOUT FILLET DESIGN FOR ENTRANCE/EXIT TAXIWAYS

Analysis of Air Transportation Systems. The Aircraft and the System

@AIRBUS A /-600 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING

AIRSIDE CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

RUNWAY ARRESTING SYSTEMS

CHAPTER 5 - FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

FLIGHT AND OPERATING MANUAL SUPPLEMENT FMS305902, REVISION 1 SEAPLANES WEST INC.

1.0 SCOPE AND INTRODUCTION. 1.1 Scope. 1.2 Introduction. 1.3 A Brief Description of the

Transportation Engineering -II Dr. Rajat Rastogi Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology - Roorkee

Key Purpose & Need Issues

F. StartupBoeing. Copyright 2007 Boeing. All rights reserved.

FAA Requirements for Engine-out Procedures and Obstacle Clearance

Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. January 27, 2009 Blacksburg, Virginia

Worst-case analysis of wake vortex induced risk of 700ft vertical separation. Gerben van Baren

Challenges to Airport Ramp & Runway Debris Control

HARD. Preventing. Nosegear Touchdowns

AIRPORT PLANNING MANUAL TRANSMITTAL LETTER REVISION 8

PLU Airport Master Plan. Master Plan Advisory Committee (MPAC) Meeting #4 March 19, 2018

REPORT A-024/2012 DATA SUMMARY

Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport; Porter Airlines Proposal Review; Interim Results/Findings, Airbiz, 26 June 2013

NOTE: DATA PRELIMINARY

International Industry Working Group Fifth Edition R1, 2007

Facility Requirements

AERODROME OPERATING MINIMA

D.1 Introduction. Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport

Transcription:

International Civil Aviation Organization on Pavement Management Systems Lima, Peru November 19-22, 2003 Boeing Aircraft and the Impact on Airports Orest Shepson Principal Engineer - Airport Technology - Boeing Commercial Airplanes 407816.1 Shepson

The Developing Boeing Airplane Family 600 500 400 747-400X Passengers 300 200 100 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Range, (1,000 nmi) 407816.2 Shepson

407816.3 Shepson

General Arrangement 717-200 93.3 ft (28.44 m) 36.9 ft (11.25 m) 124.0 ft (37.80 m) 29.1 ft (8.87 m) 16.0 ft (4.9 m) 57.8 ft (17.6 m) ICAO Aerodrome Reference Code C/RFF Category 6 407816.4 Shepson

Range Capability From Lima, Peru Full Passenger Payload 717-200 110,000-lb (49,890-kg) MTOW 106 passengers 717-200* 121,000-lb (54,880-kg) TOGW* 106 passengers Conditions: Typical mission rules 85% annual winds Airways and traffic allowance included Two-class seating * With 730 USG auxiliary fuel 407816.5 Shepson

717-200 Aircraft Classification Number Rigid and Flexible Pavement 40 35 Subgrade codes C D Aircraft classification number (ACN) 30 25 A B 20 15 75 Legend: Flexible pavement Rigid pavement 10 34.1 36.3 38.6 40.9 43.1 45.5 47.7 50.0 52.2 54.5 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Gross weight, lb x 1,000 407816.6 Shepson

407816.7 Shepson

FAA 737-600 Airplane Design Group III/ARFF Index B 737-700 Airplane Design Group III/ARFF Index B 737-800 Airplane Design Group III/ARFF Index C 737-900 Airplane Design Group III/ARFF Index C General Arrangement 737-600/-700/-800/-900 407816.8 Shepson

737-600/-700/-800/-900 With Winglets ICAO Size Comparison 737-600 Aerodrome Reference Code C/RFF Category 6 737-700 Aerodrome Reference Code C/RFF Category 6 737-800 Aerodrome Reference Code C/RFF Category 7 737-900 Aerodrome Reference Code C/RFF Category 7 407816.9 Shepson

Minimum Pavement Width For 180-Deg Turn Notes: 1. Maximum effective steering angle = 75 deg 2. Typical edge clearances are 10 ft (3 m) at each side of pavement turn area 407816.10 Shepson Airplane model 737-600 737-700 737-800 737-900 Dimension A 60.8 ft (18.5 m) 66.4 ft (20.3 m) 79.1 ft (24.1 m) 85.4 ft (26.0 m)

737-800/-900 Aircraft Classification 60 50 Subgrade codes C D B 40 Aircraft classification number (ACN) 30 A 20 0 0 34.1 45.5 56.8 68.2 79.5 90.9 0 75 100 125 150 175 200 Legend: Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Flexible pavement Rigid pavement Gross weight, lb x 1,000 407816.11 Shepson

Range Capability From Lima, Peru 737-600 143,500-lb (65,099-kg) MTOW 110 passengers 737-700* 154,500-lb (70,080-kg) MTOW 126 passengers 737-800* 174,200-lb (79,010-kg) MTOW 162 passengers 737-900* 174,200-lb (79,010-kg) MTOW 177 passengers Full Passenger Payload Conditions: Typical mission rules 85% annual winds Airways and traffic allowance included Two-class seating * With optional winglets 407816.12 Shepson

407816.13 Shepson

General Arrangement 757-200/300 The 757-300 is 23 ft (7 m) longer than the 757-200 ICAO 757-200 Aerodrome Reference Code D/RFF Category 7 757-300 Aerodrome Reference Code D/RFF Category 8 407816.14 Shepson

757 Minimum Pavement Width For 180-Deg Turn Nosegear track A Notes: 1. Maximum effective steering angle = 75 deg 2. ICAO/FAA recommends 10 ft (3 m) minimum edge safety distance at each side of pavement turn area (dimension A) between the tire face and pavement edge. Airplane model 757-200 757-300 Dimension A 120 ft (36.6 m) 142 ft (43.3 m) 407816.15 Shepson

Runway Loading Comparison 55 50 45 Aircraft classification number (ACN) 40 737-700 737-400 737-800/-900 757-300 35 737-600 737-300 757-200 737-500 30 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Two-class seating Flexible pavement, subgrade B Airplanes at maximum takeoff weight Number of passengers 407816.16 Shepson

Range Capability From Lima, Peru Full Passenger Payload 757-200 255,000-lb (115,660-kg) MTOW 200 passengers 757-300 273,000-lb (123,830-kg) MTOW 243 passengers Conditions: Typical mission rules 85% annual winds Airways and traffic allowance included Two-class seating 407816.17 Shepson

Twin-Aisle Airplanes 650 600 550 Legend: Long-range rules In service Launched Study 500 450 Passengers 400 777-300 747-100 747-300 747-200 747-400 777-300ER 747-400ER 350 580K 777-200 660K 777-200LR 300 250 506K 545K MD-11ER 656K 200 767-400ER 767-300ER 767-200ER 150 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 Range, nmi 407816.18 Shepson

Airport Compatibility 767-200/-300/-400ER 407816.19 Shepson

767-200/-300/-400ER General Arrangement ICAO 767-200 Aerodrome Reference Code D/RFF Category 7 767-300 Aerodrome Reference Code D/RFF Category 8 767-400ER Aerodrome Reference Code D/RFF Category 9 201 ft 4 in (61.37 m) 180 ft 3 in (54.94 m) 159 ft 2 in (48.51 m) 170 ft 4 in* (52 m) 156 ft 1 in (-200 & -300) (47.57 m) 61 ft 4 in (18.62 m) 55 ft 4 in (16.81 m) 52 ft 0 in (15.85 m) *Fully loaded is 170 ft 7 in (52 m) 30 ft 6 in (9.30 m) 74 ft 8 in (22.76 m) 85 ft 10 in (26.16 m) 407816.20 Shepson

Range Capability From Lima, Peru Full Passenger Payload 767-300ER 412,000-lb (186,880-kg) MTOW 218 passengers 767-400ER 450,000-lb (204,120-kg) MTOW 245 passengers Conditions: Typical mission rules 85% annual winds Airways and traffic allowance included Three-class seating 407816.21 Shepson

90 ACN Comparison Flexible Pavement 80 70 60 767-400ER 767-300 A340-300 ACN 50 40 30 A340-200 747-400 20 10 767-200 Subgrade - Code C 0 45.5 90.9 136.3 181.8 227.2 272.7 318.1 363.6 409.0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Aircraft weight, lb x 1,000 407816.22 Shepson

70 ACN Comparison 767-400ER Rigid Pavement 60 50 767-300 A340-300 40 ACN 747-400 30 A340-200 20 10 767-200 Subgrade - Code B 0 45.5 90.9 136.3 181.8 227.2 272.7 318.1 363.6 409.0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Aircraft weight, lb x 1,000 407816.23 Shepson

407816.24 Shepson

General Arrangement 777-200/-300 ICAO 777-200 Aerodrome Reference Code E/RFF Category 9 777-300 Aerodrome Reference Code E/RFF Category 9 777-200 777-300 36 ft 0 in (11.0 m) 199 ft 11 in (60.9 m) 70 ft 7.5 in (21.5 m) 209 ft 1 in (63.7 m) 242 ft 4 in (73.8 m) 60 ft 9 in (18.5 m) 60 ft 8 in (18.5 m) 209 ft 1 in (63.7 m) 84 ft 11 in (25.9 m) 102 ft 5 in (31.2 m) 242 ft 4 in (73.8 m) 407816.25 Shepson

Range Capability From Lima, Peru 777-200 545,000-lb (247,210-kg) MTOW 305 passengers 777-200ER 656,000-lb (297,560-kg) MTOW 301 passengers 777-200LR* 766,000-lb (347,450-kg) MTOW 301 passengers 777-300 660,000-lb (299,370-kg) MTOW 368 passengers 777-300ER 759,600-lb (344,540-kg) MTOW 365 passengers Conditions: Typical mission rules 85% annual winds Airways and traffic allowance included Three-class seating * With 5,500 USG auxiliary fuel Full Passenger Payload 407816.26 Shepson

777 Minimum Pavement Width For 180-Degree Turn Nosegear track A Notes: 1. Maximum effective steering angle = 64 deg 2. FAA/ICAO recommends 15 ft (4.5 m) minimum edge safety distance at each side of pavement turn area (dimension A) between the tire face and pavement edge. Airplane model 777-200 777-300 Dimension A 156.0 ft (47.5 m) 182.0 ft (55.4 m) 407816.27 Shepson

100 80 777-200/-300 Aircraft Classification Number (ACN) Subgrade codes Characteristics C D ACN 60 40 A B 20 0 Legend: Flexible pavement Rigid pavement 407816.28 Shepson 45.5 90.9 136.3 181.8 227.2 272.7 318.1 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Aircraft weight, lb x 1,000

Airport Compatibility 777-200LR/-300ER 407816.29 Shepson

General Arrangement Longer-Range 777-200LR ICAO 777-200LR Aerodrome Reference Code E/RFF Category 9 407816.30 Shepson

General Arrangement Longer-Range 777-300ER ICAO 777-300ERAerodrome Reference Code E/RFF Category 9 * Wing span measured at jig position ** Tail height measured at max weight 407816.31 Shepson

Range Capability From Los Angeles 777-200 545,000-lb (247,210-kg) MTOW 305 three-class passenger 777-200ER 656,000-lb (297,560-kg) MTOW 301 three-class passenger 777-200LR* 750,000-lb (340,200-kg) MTOW 301 three-class passenger 777-300 660,000-lb (299,370-kg) MTOW 368 three-class passenger 777-300ER 750,000-lb (340,200-kg) MTOW 365 three-class passenger Full Passenger Payload Conditions: Typical mission rules 85% annual winds Airways and traffic allowances included * Two auxiliary fuel tanks 407816.32 Shepson

100 ACN Comparison Flexible Pavement 90 80 70 60 A340-500 A340-600 ACN 50 40 30 777-200LR 777-300ER 20 10 Subgrade - Code C 0 181.8 227.2 272.7 318.1 363.6 409.0 400 500 600 700 800 900 Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Aircraft weight, lb x 1,000 407816.33 Shepson

ACN Comparison Rigid Pavement 90 80 70 60 777-200LR 777-300ER ACN 50 40 A340-600 30 20 10 A340-500 Subgrade - Code B 0 181.8 227.2 272.7 318.1 363.6 409.0 400 500 600 700 800 900 Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Aircraft weight, lb x 1,000 407816.34 Shepson

Airport Compatibility 747-400ER 407816.35 Shepson

General Arrangement 747-400ER (910K) ICAO 747-400ERAerodrome Reference Code E/RFF Category 9 407816.36 Shepson

Range Capability From Lima, Peru Full Passenger Payload 747-400* 875,000-lb (396,900-kg) MTOW 416 passengers 747-400ER 910,000-lb (412,770-kg) MTOW 416 passengers Conditions: Typical mission rules 85% annual winds Airways and traffic allowance included Three-class seating * With 3,300 USG auxiliary tail fuel 407816.37 Shepson

Aircraft Classification Number 747-400ER Rigid and Flexible Pavement (MTW-913K) ACN 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 Code A - CBR 15 (High) Code C - CBR 10 (Medium) Code C - CBR 6 (Low) Code D - CBR 3 (Ultra Low) Code D - K = 75 (Ultra Low) Code C - K = 150 (Low) Code B - K = 300 (Medium) Code A - K = 550 (High) 40 30 Legend: Flexible pavement Rigid pavement 407816.38 Shepson 20 250.0 272.7 295.4 318.1 340.9 363.6 386.3 409.0 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Aircraft weight, lb x 1,000

The Developing Boeing Airplane Family 600 500 400 747-400X Passengers 300 200 100 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Range, (1,000 nmi) 407816.39 Shepson

PRELIMINARY General Arrangement 747-400X Quiet Longer Ranger 407816.40 Shepson PRELIMINARY

100 ACN Comparison Flexible Pavement 90 80 747-400 70 60 747X Stretch ACN 50 40 30 20 10 Subgrade - Code C A380-800 0 227.2 272.7 318.1 363.6 409.0 454.5 500.0 545.4 590.9 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Aircraft weight, lb x 1,000 407816.41 Shepson

Trends in Pavement Loading Trend in ACN FB 90 80 70 ACN 60 50 40 30 20 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Years in service 407816.42 Shepson

Trends in Pavement Loading Trend in ACN RB 90 80 70 ACN 60 50 40 30 20 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Years in service 407816.43 Shepson

Commercial Airplanes Product Development Creating Value for the Future Flexible and Standard Airplanes Advanced Concepts 407816.44 Shepson

Airport Planning Manuals Available at: http://www.boeing.com/airports Selecting airport technology data will produce a pop-up window Select planning manuals from pop-up window Select model from following screen to get Adobe Acrobat file 407816.45 Shepson

407816.46 Shepson

407816.47 Shepson

ACN Basis Flexible pavement U.S. Corps of Engineers S-77-1 computer program Rigid pavement Portland Cement Association PDILB computer program Calculations are done for defined Standard conditions Four representative subgrade support levels (from very weak to strong) Typical pavement life (10,000 coverages for flexible pavements) 407816.48 Shepson

The Standard U.S. Corps of Engineers Flexible Pavement Design Equation t (A) Log = α -0.0418-1.1562 Log CBR P CBR P 2 3-0.4730 Log CBR P -0.6414 The equation considers all loads as an equivalent single wheel load (P). Pavement longevity and the number of applied wheel loads are considered via the a factor. 407816.49 Shepson

View of the NAPTP Test Vehicle 407816.50 Shepson

Runway Loads - Takeoff / Landing Typical Jet Aircraft 100 Runway load % max taxi 80 60 40 LANDING TAKEOFF 20 0 Distance Runway pavements are designed for static load. The impact of landing is only about 38% of the takeoff static load. 407816.51 Shepson

Runway Roughness 407816.52 Shepson

What Kind of Roughness are We Concerned About? The kind that leads to: Excessive onboard vibration Instrument visibility Rudder and steering control Maximum oleo compression Landing gear fatigue life 407816.53 Shepson

Boeing Runway Roughness Criteria Bump height, cm 20 15 Unacceptable Excessive 10 Acceptable 5 L RUNWAY ROUGHNESS CRITERIA L L H H H 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Bump length, m 60 407816.54 Shepson

Airplane Load Exceedances for Fatigue Life Cumulative occurrences per 1,000 flight cycles 500,000 50,000 1,000 50 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Vertical acceleration at CG (g units) 0.7 407816.55 Shepson

407816.56 Shepson

Sample Survey Results Frost Heave 5.05 Centerline 4C 5.00 4.95 South 4.90 2N North 3N 4.85 5+300 5+340 5+380 Runway station, m 4N 5+420 407816.57 Shepson

Roughness Analysis of a Sample Runway Bump height, cm 14 N = north C = center S = south 12 10 8 6 4 2 Unacceptable 1N 4S 4N 1C 4C 2N 2C Acceptable 0 0 5 10 15 20 Bump length, m 3S 3C 2S 3N Excessive 25 407816.58 Shepson

Boeing Runway Roughness Criteria Bump height, cm 20 15 Unacceptable Excessive 10 Acceptable 5 L RUNWAY ROUGHNESS CRITERIA L L H H H 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Bump length, m 60 407816.59 Shepson

Temporary Ramping Application of Boeing Criteria 4.0 10 Bump height, in 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 Bump height, cm 8 6 4 1/100 slope 1/200 slope Acceptable limit 1.0 2 0.5 0.0 0 0 5 10 15 20 Bump length, m 25 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Bump length, (ft) 407816.60 Shepson

Runway Ramping Recommendations A. Ramping prior to aircraft traffic Predominant direction of traffic Overlay thickness x Ramp Milled area Old surface Overlay thickness x B. Surface preparation prior to resumption of paving Overlay thickness x y Cut area to depth y Old surface Notes 1. When overlay thickness x < = 5 cm, then ramp slope = 1.0% 2. When overlay thickness x > 5 cm, then ramp slope = 0.5% 3. Depth y should be at least 2 times the maximum aggregate size 407816.61 Shepson

407816.62 Shepson

Conclusions Runways may become intolerably rough due to The onset of pavement structural failure Adverse environmental conditions such as freezing and thawing cycles Airport operators are not usually aware of the impact of roughness on aircraft The Boeing criteria will enable the airport operator to Determine the extent of roughness Locate the source of roughness Make rational decisions as to the best course of action Nightime paving can be accomplished with a minimum of downtime by using the Boeing criteria 407816.63 Shepson

407816.64 Shepson

407816.65 Shepson

407816.66 Shepson

407816.67 Shepson

FAA Advisory Circular 150/5380-6 Guidelines for Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements Figure A-26. Airport pavement condition index (PCI) and rating Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Very Poor Failed 85-100 70-85 55-70 40-55 25-40 10-25 0-10 407816.68 Shepson

International Civil Aviation Organization on Pavement Management Systems Lima, Peru November 19-22, 2003 407816.69 Shepson