M A T L Reference. MATL Path 83 Transfer Capability with Seasonal SOL Affects. Document. 1. Purpose

Similar documents
MATL Reference. MATL Path 83 Transfer Capability with Seasonal SOL Effects. Document. 1. Purpose

VAR-501-WECC-3 Power System Stabilizer. A. Introduction

Transmission Reliability Margin. Implementation Document (TRMID)

A. Introduction Title: Power System Stabilizer (PSS) 2. Number: VAR 501 WECC

MEMORANDUM. Open Section Background. I-66 Open Section Study Area. VDOT Northern Virginia District. I-66 Project Team. Date: November 5, 2015

Updated Transmission Expansion Plan for the Puget Sound Area to Support Winter South-to-North Transfers. Approved by PSAST on

Special Pricing Rule Updates

Attachment F1 Technical Justification - Applicability WECC-0107 Power System Stabilizer VAR-501-WECC-3

Wrapper Instruction Register (WIR) Specifications

A. Introduction Title: Power System Stabilizer (PSS)

A New Way to Work in the ERCOT Market

Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

Appendix D Explanation of Route Changes. Prepared by: Idaho Power Company 1221 W Idaho Street Boise, ID 83702

AIRBUS FlyByWire How it really works

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Coral Springs Charter High School and Middle School Job No Page 2

OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)

PBN AIRSPACE CONCEPT WORKSHOP. SIDs/STARs/HOLDS. Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ICAO Doc 9931

Northfield to Ingle Farm #2 66 kv Sub transmission line

Report on Geographic Scope of Market-based Measures (MBMS)

JACKSONVILLE CENTER AND SAVANNAH TRACON. LETTER OF AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE: December 22, 2006

FUEL MANAGEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT

NORTH FRASER PERIMETER ROAD WEST CORRIDOR DEFINITION STUDY

Design Airspace (Routes, Approaches and Holds) Module 11 Activity 7. European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation

Analysis of en-route vertical flight efficiency

Frequently Asked Questions

Measuring the Business of the NAS

C. APPROACH FOR IDENTIFYING THE BEST ROUTES FOR THE NEEDED TRANSMISSION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

Traffic Analysis Final Report

Surveillance and Broadcast Services

International Civil Aviation Organization. Agenda Item 6: Free Route Airspace Concept implementations within the EUR Region FREE ROUTE AIRSPACE DESIGN

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

UC Berkeley Working Papers

GUERNSEY ADVISORY CIRCULARS. (GACs) EXTENDED DIVERSION TIME OPERATIONS GAC 121/135-3

Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) in the SAM Region METHODOLOGY ADOPTED BY BRAZIL TO CALCULATE THE CONTROL CAPACITY OF ACC OF BRAZILIAN FIR

Safety / Performance Criteria Agreeing Assumptions Module 10 - Activities 5 & 6

The Challenge of Surface Conditions. AST: A New Solution to a Global Aviation Problem. Benefits and Business Value to Airports and Operators

1 Introduction 2 2 Acknowledgements 2 3 Differences between Green Star SA rating tools 2 4 About the Calculator 2 5 How to Use the Calculator 2

Opspecs Revision status TABLE OF CONTENTS, LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES, AND RATINGS AUTHORITY. Page revision

REGULATION No. 10/2011 ON APPROVAL OF FLIGHT PROCEDURES INCLUDING SID-s AND STAR-s. Article 1 Scope of Application

Advisory Circular. 1.1 Purpose Applicability Description of Changes... 2

APPLICANTS PROPOSED TOUR SCHEDULE & PROTOCOL

Official Journal of the European Union L 146/7

Notification to Suppliers

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AVIATION Airworthiness Notices EXTENDED DIVERSION TIME OPERATIONS (EDTO)

Official Journal of the European Union L 186/27

Analysis of ATM Performance during Equipment Outages

EASTERN MILES MEMBERSHIP TERMS AND CONDITIONS

FUTENMA REPLACEMENT FACILITY BILATERAL EXPERTS STUDY GROUP REPORT. August 31, 2010

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

AGREEMENT FOR OPERATION OF THE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER AT THE TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT

rtc transit Before and After Studies for RTC Transit Boulder highway UPWP TASK Before Conditions

Airline Schedule Development Overview Dr. Peter Belobaba

Transportation Engineering -II Dr. Rajat Rastogi Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology - Roorkee

Planning. Proposed Development at the Southeast Corner of Lakeshore Road West and Brookfield Road Intersection FINAL.

SERVICE BULLETIN TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKS - AIRBORNE INSTRUMENT AIR SYSTEM COMPONENT REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

Defining and Managing capacities Brian Flynn, EUROCONTROL

Memorandum of Understanding

Using PBN for Terminal and Extended Terminal Operations

Technical Standard Order

SPADE-2 - Supporting Platform for Airport Decision-making and Efficiency Analysis Phase 2

RED ATLAS PRODUCT BROCHURE. From Nevalee Business Solutions

Today s flight path. 1. WestJet s Story 2. Background 3. Approach 4. Results and Recommendations 5. Questions?

AIRSPACE STRUCTURE. In aeronautics, airspaces are the portion of the atmosphere controlled by a country above its territory.

IRTI/TF/1. DRAFT ICAO Position FOR WRC-15 Agenda Item 5 (WP/09)

Chapter 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

AUTORIDAD DEL CANAL DE PANAMÁ EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENCY FOR OPERATIONS

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

The following criteria shall be applied within the boundaries of the AO District:

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

A. CONCLUSIONS OF THE FGEIS

Human Powered Flight THE KREMER HUMAN-POWERED AIRCRAFT FOR SPORT

ORDINANCE NO. _2013-

Special edition paper Development of a Crew Schedule Data Transfer System

TEAM INTEGRATED ENGINEERING, INC. TRAVEL PROCEDURES FOR REST AND RELAXATION (R&R)

RE: Draft AC , titled Determining the Classification of a Change to Type Design

AIR/GROUND SIMULATION OF TRAJECTORY-ORIENTED OPERATIONS WITH LIMITED DELEGATION

COMMUTING MASS TRANSPORT CALCULATOR GUIDE Version 1.0

EUROPEAN MILITARY AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS EMAR 21 SECTION A

Office of the President University Policy

ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRIUBTION OF FLIGHTPLAN ROUTE SELECTION ON ENROUTE DELAYS USING RAMS

Treasure Island Supplemental Information Report Addendum

PSEG Long Island. Community Distributed Generation ( CDG ) Program. Procedural Requirements

MEMORANDUM. Lynn Hayes LSA Associates, Inc.

TENTS, CANOPIES AND TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRUCTURES

Helicopter Performance. Performance Class 2 - The Concept. Jim Lyons

EUROPEAN MILITARY AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS. EMAR 21 (SECTION A and B)

Pilot RVSM Training Guidance Material

APPENDIX D MSP Airfield Simulation Analysis

FLIGHT CONTROLS- RUDDER CABLE PULLEY BRACKET INSPECTION/REPAIR

ACI-NA BUSINESS TERM SURVEY APRIL 2017

SERVICE BULLETIN EQUIPMENT/FURNISHINGS - PILOT AND COPILOT SHOULDER HARNESS GUIDE RETAINING WASHER INSPECTION AND/OR REPLACEMENT SYNOPSIS OF CHANGE

Schedule 2.2 Termination Services

CONTROLLED AIRSPACE CONTAINMENT POLICY

ERIE ATCT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

CENTRAL AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT ( C-ATFM ) INDIA CATFM. ATFM Global Symposium /22/2017 ATFM Global Symposium 2017

Transcription:

1. Purpose This document outlines the Transfer Capability on MATL Path 83 for both long-term capability and for current seasonal capabilities adjusted for known System Operating Limits (SOLs), such as adjacent system constraints that limit the Available Transfer Capability and operating configurations for MATL that reduce the Available Transfer Capability. MATL s Path 83 Transfer Capability adjusted for such SOLs becomes the basis for the current year s short-term ATC. 2. References MATL 2007 Phase II Path Rating Study Report MATL 2012 Phase II Path Rating Study Report MATL Summer 2013 SOL Study Report MATL 301- Normal Operations Planning MATL 804 - ATCID 3. Responsibility MATL is an independent merchant transmission-only company based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada doing business in Canada as Montana Alberta Tie LTD and in the United States as MATL LLP, collectively referred to as MATL. MATL retains the responsibility of performing seasonal studies to determine its System Operating Limit (SOL) in accordance with the Peak RC methodology for the operations horizon. 4. Long Term Capability MATL Path 83 is a 345 km, 240/230kV, 330 MVA transmission line designed for continuous power transfers of up to 325 MW north-to-south and 300 MW south-to-north metered at MATL 120S. Based on the Phase II Path Rating studies approved by the PRG and accepted by the WECC PCC, MATL Path 83 is able to achieve the following ratings metered at MATL 120S substation: MATL Path 83 Transfer Direction North-to-south South-to-north MATL 120S 325 MW 300 MW MATL Path 83 southbound long term capability identified in the table above is contingent upon seasonally studying the limitation identified in section 5. Page 1 of 16

5. Limiting Conditions Conditions limiting the availability of will be analyzed seasonally by determining the System Operating Limit (SOL) in accordance with the Peak RC methodology for the operations horizon. Based on the seasonal studies reviewed by the NOPSG and submitted to the Peak RC, MATL Path 83 is able to achieve the following seasonal limits with all circuit equipment in service. As a result, any combination of operation within these maximum limits is acceptable under normal operating conditions. The SOL on MATL is adjusted in accordance with additional study work for conditions when MATL s equipment such as its series compensation at Hay Lake and Marias are out of service. Under certain import and export scenarios where the direction of the flows on WECC designated Path 1 and MATL Path 83 are in opposite direction with respect to Alberta s market, MATL s SOL may be reduced due to the Phase Shifting Transformer (PST) reaching its angle limit. Imports into Alberta MATL SOL Northbound Maximum northbound flow at MATL 120S into the Alberta Interconnected Electric System (MW) Maximum northbound flow into Alberta at the CA-USA border (MW) AB.MT.MATL Normal Operations 300 310 1 325 Hay Lake and Marias series compensation out of service MATL radially connected to the NWMT system 248 254 1 266 N/A N/A 189 Maximum northbound flow at Great Falls into the MATL Interconnected System (MW) MATL.NWMT 1 For metered flows at CA-USA border as Balancing Authority boundary interchange between AESO and NWMT. Page 2 of 16

Imports into Montana MATL SOL Southbound Maximum southbound flow at MATL 120S into the MATL Interconnected System (MW) Maximum southbound flow into Montana at the CA-USA border (MW) AB.MT.MATL Maximum southbound flow at Great Falls into Montana (MW) MATL.NWMT Normal Operations 325 315 1 300 Hay Lake and Marias series compensation out of service MATL radially connected to the NWMT system 263 256 1 245 N/A N/A 189 5.1 Northbound Limit The studies identified that there is a limitation on the maximum simultaneous import into Alberta between Path 1 and MATL Path 83. However, the allocation of imports into Alberta will be determined by AESO as per their Available Transfer Capability (ATC) and Transfer Path Management rule. The rule ensures that the total flow on Path 1 and MATL Path 83 is less than the sum of Path 1 and MATL Path 83 simultaneous limits. 5.2 Southbound Limit For southbound flows into Montana at Great Falls, MATL Path 83 is able to achieve its full capability as documented in the WECC Path Rating studies unless real-time constraints necessitate curtailment. 5.3 North Terminal vs. Border POR/POD For Transmission Service requests under the MATL Tariff, the north terminal is the MATL 120S substation 240 kv bus near Lethbridge, Alberta. However, the POR/POD to be used for the MATL Line north end must be represented at the Canada-USA Border identified as a POR/POD with point name of AB.MT.MATL. This enables the Alberta portion of the MATL Line to be internalized within the AESO market and AESO Balancing Authority Area, which is in conformance with AESO procedures and Alberta governance. The Alberta portion of the MATL Line is further described in MATL s Procedure MATL-814 MATL Line Losses in Alberta posted on MATL s OASIS under the Business Practices folder. The Available Transfer Capability (ATC) for the MATL Line is posted on under the System Data prompt. Sample diagrams of the MATL PORs/PODs are illustrated in Section 6 below. Page 3 of 16

6. ATC computation in the Scheduling Horizon MATL computes all scheduled energy flows and transmission service requests in its calculations to update its Available Transfer Capability (ATC) in real-time. The sum of existing firm commitments along with Capacity Benefit Margin (CBM) and Transmission Reliability Margin (TRM) are subtracted from the Total Transfer Capability (TTC) to determine MATL s ATC at any given time during the Scheduling Horizon. All TSRs and scheduled energy tags are attested against the ATC to decide if a request for a new TSR or the request to schedule energy will be approved or rejected. To determine the remaining ATC that would be available for new TSRs, MATL continuously and simultaneously decrements the TTC on each segment of the MATL Line for each confirmed and pending TSR. The same procedure is used to determine non-firm ATC, including the release of transmission capacity from unscheduled energy in the Scheduling Horizon. If the recalculated ATC is negative for either segment of the MATL Line, MATL s curtailment manager software will curtail schedules as necessary to restore ATC from a negative value. 6.1 Northbound Flows Example As depicted by the flows in Figure 1 below, MATL s firm ATC is 0 MW for a scenario where AESO s ATC into Alberta on MATL is 300 MW and existing firm commitment of 300 MW is in place between MATL and its customers. On the contrary, non-firm ATC is 61 MW as a result of unscheduled firm commitment released as non-firm capacity in the Scheduling Horizon. Page 4 of 16

MATL 120S AESO ATC = 300 MW POD: AB.MT.MATL Canada/US Border MATL TTC = 300 MW MATL firm ATC = 0 MATL non-firm ATC = 61 MW 239 MW POR: WWA Hay Lake 189 MW (Firm) RimRock 50 MW (Firm) POR: MATL.NWMT Great Falls Figure 1: MATL's Northbound ATC in Scheduling Horizon Page 5 of 16

6.2 Southbound Example As depicted by the flows in Figure 2 below, MATL s firm ATC is 200 MW for a scenario where the TTC into Montana on MATL is 300 MW and existing firm scheduled commitment of 100 MW is in place between MATL and its customers. Similarly, non-firm ATC is also 200 MW since there is no unscheduled firm commitment that can be released as non-firm capacity in the Scheduling Horizon. MATL 120S POR: AB.MT.MATL Canada/US Border 50 MW (Firm) POR: WWA Hay Lake 50 MW (Firm) RimRock 100 MW POD: MATL.NWMT Great Falls MATL TTC = 300 MW MATL Firm ATC = 200 MW MATL non-firm ATC = 200 MW NWE ATC = 300 MW Figure 2: MATL's Southbound ATC in Scheduling Horizon Page 6 of 16

7. Management of ATC and SOL on Path 83 MATL Line The POR/POD for MATL s north terminal is represented at the Canada-USA Border with point name of AB.MT.MATL. This POR/POD point also represents the interchange between the MATL and AESO system. Similarly, Path 83 MATL line south end terminal is represented at the Great Falls substation with point name of MATL.NWMT. The ATC values posted on these two terminals represents the transfer capability of the MATL line at any given time. As depicted in Figure 3, MATL manages these terminals to ensure that the path is not limited for the Hay Lake connected wind customer under scenarios when an external constraint is identified by either NWE or AESO. When MATL is radially connected to the NWMT system, the POR/POD for MATL s north terminal is WWA. This POR/POD point represents the interconnection point for the Rim Rock wind facility. The POR/POD for MATL s south terminal is the Great Falls substation with point name of MATL.NWMT. The ATC values posted on these two terminals represents the transfer capability of the MATL line at any given time. When MATL is operated radially, the ATC has been identified as 189 MW based on the maximum generation output from the Rim Rock facility. Technical studies have confirmed that MATL can operate safely and reliably in this operating configuration with this maximum loading level. Page 7 of 16

AESO System Import ATC = AESO s Real-Time Value MATL System Export ATC = AESO s Real-Time Value POR/POD: AB.MT.MATL Canada/US Border Export ATC = AESO s Real-Time Value Import ATC = 325 MW POR/POD: WWA POD: MATL.WWA Hay Lake RimRock MATL System NWE System Export ATC = 325 MW POR/POD: MATL.NWMT Great Falls Import ATC = 325 MW Export ATC = 300 MW Import ATC = 300 MW Legend MATL AESO NWE Figure 3: Management of ATC and SOL on MATL Page 8 of 16

7.1 Southbound Constraint Identified by AESO MATL export ATC into Alberta at AB.MT.MATL is automatically adjusted by OATI s Curtailment Management software by utilizing real-time ATC values provided by the AESO. However, MATL s import ATC at the AESO end is set to 325 MW regardless of any constraints in Alberta system. This ensures that the Hay Lake connected wind customer is not restricted to export southbound into Montana due to possible real-time constraints in Alberta. This is further illustrated in Figure-4.0 for a scenario when AESO s export ATC is 100 MW and MATL s export ATC is 325 MW into Montana. Page 9 of 16

AESO System Real Flows <= 100 MW Import ATC = AESO s Real-Time Value MATL System Export ATC = 100 MW POR/POD: AB.MT.MATL Canada/US Border Export ATC = AESO s Real-Time Value Import ATC = 325 MW POR/POD: WWA POD: MATL.WWA Hay Lake Real Flows = Maximum Capacity (189 MW) RimRock Real Flows <= 289 MW MATL System NWE System Export ATC = 325 MW POR/POD: MATL.NWMT Great Falls Import ATC = 325 MW Export ATC = 300 MW Import ATC = 300 MW Legend MATL AESO NWE Figure 4: Southbound Constraint Example Page 10 of 16

7.2 Northbound Constraint Identified by NWE MATL export ATC into Montana at MATL.NWMT is set to 300 MW as per the SOL studies coordinated with NWE. Similarly, the import ATC into MATL at the NWE end is set to 325 MW regardless of any constraints in Montana system. This ensures that the Hay Lake connected wind customer is not restricted to export northbound into Alberta due to possible real-time constraints in Montana. This is further illustrated in Figure-5.0 for a scenario when NWE s export ATC is 100 MW and MATL s import ATC is 325 MW northbound into Alberta. Note: MATL ATC posting does not ensure transmission capacity is available through adjacent scheduling segments. Page 11 of 16

AESO System Import ATC = AESO s Real-Time Value MATL System Export ATC = AESO s Real-Time Value POR/POD: AB.MT.MATL Canada/US Border Import ATC = AESO s Real-Time Value Export ATC = 325 MW Real Flows <= 289 MW POR/POD: WWA POD: MATL.WWA Hay Lake Real Flows = Maximum Capacity (189 MW) RimRock MATL System NWE System Export ATC = 100 MW POR/POD: MATL.NWMT Great Falls Import ATC = 325 MW Export ATC = 300 MW Import ATC = 300 MW Real Flows <= 100 MW Legend MATL AESO NWE Figure 5: Northbound Constraint Example Page 12 of 16

8. Definitions and Acronyms Unless the context otherwise indicates, any word or expression defined in the NERC Standards shall have that meaning when capitalized in this Operating Procedure. The following additional terms are capitalized in this Operating Procedure when used as defined below: Term PRG WECC PCC AESO MATL NOPSG NWE SOGF WECC Peak RC Definition Project Review Group WECC Planning Coordination Committee Alberta Electric System Operator Montana Alberta Tie Limited Northwest Operations Planning Study Group NorthWestern Energy South of Great Falls (NWE) Western Electricity Coordinating Council Peak Reliability - Reliability Coordinator 9. Change Procedure for Operating Procedures MATL will update this document based on the seasonal SOL studies performed consistent with the Peak RC methodology. Page 13 of 16

Change History Version No Reason for Change Changed By Date 0.1 Prepared initial draft based on Path Rating and SOL study results 1.1 Provide Great Falls terminal representation in provided tables. Aekam Sodhi 06-10-2013 Darrel Gunst 06-25-2013 1.2 Minor modifications to section 5 Aekam Sodhi 07-02-2013 1.3 Clarification of Purpose statement and footnotes. Added maximum flows at CA-USA border 1.4 Added section 6 that describes the computation of ATC in the Scheduling Horizon; 1.4a Added Sec. 5.3 North Terminal vs. Border POR/POD. 1.5 Updated section 5 as per southbound SOL values confirmed by NorthWestern Energy Removed footnotes 1 and 2 as requested by AESO 1.6 Added section-7 on Management of ATC and SOL on Path 83 MATL Line 1.7 Modifications to section-7 Kevin Burns 1.8 Added note in section 7.2 as per NorthWestern Energy Added language on real-time constraints in section 5.2 as per NorthWestern Energy 1.9 Updated SOL table to include scenario when MATL series compensation is out of service 2.0 Included a description of MATL radially connected to the NWMT system, which is a new operating configuration for MATL, in sections 5 and 7 Darrel Gunst 07-09-2013 Aekam Sodhi 07-26-2013 Darrel Gunst 07-30-2013 Aekam Sodhi 08-09-2013 Aekam Sodhi 12-05-2013 Larry Monday 12-19-2013 Aekam Sodhi 07-24-2014 Aekam Sodhi 08-13-2104 Michael Manarovici 2.1 Replaced WECC RC with Peak RC Michael Manarovici 04-02-2015 04-07-2015 Page 14 of 16

2.2 Minor corrections to the tables in section 5 Michael Manarovici 2.3 Minor corrections to the table in section 5 and section 7 Michael Manarovici 05-01-2015 07-28-2015 Page 15 of 16