RUNWAY OPERATIONS: Computing Runway Arrival Capacity

Similar documents
RUNWAY OPERATIONS: Computing Runway Arrival Capacity

Airfield Capacity Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Analysis of Air Transportation Systems. Airport Capacity

Time-Space Analysis Airport Runway Capacity. Dr. Antonio A. Trani. Fall 2017

ACRP Project Evaluating Airfield Capacity

Future Airport Concept (Increasing the Airport Capacity)

! Figure 1. Proposed Cargo Ramp at the end of Taxiway Echo.! Assignment 7: Airport Capacity and Geometric Design. Problem 1

Integrated Optimization of Arrival, Departure, and Surface Operations

Determining Airport Acceptance Rate (AAR) Mexico City Airport Case Study

Evidence for the Safety- Capacity Trade-Off in the Air Transportation System

Operational Performance and Capacity Assessment for Perth Airport

Surface Congestion Management. Hamsa Balakrishnan Massachusetts Institute of Technology

ACRP Project 03-17: Evaluating Airfield Capacity

A Study of Tradeoffs in Airport Coordinated Surface Operations

Airport Engineering Lectures

Assignment 10: Final Project

A Note on Runway Capacity Definition and Safety

SPADE-2 - Supporting Platform for Airport Decision-making and Efficiency Analysis Phase 2

Supplementary airfield projects assessment

Enhanced Time Based Separation

Airport capacity effects of RECAT or: An airport view on RECAT

Validation of Runway Capacity Models

Enhanced Time Based Separation (ETBS) & RECAT EU. Heathrow Crew Briefing

Design of a Control Law for an Autonomous Approach and Landing Spacing System

APPENDIX D MSP Airfield Simulation Analysis

Analysis of Operational Impacts of Continuous Descent Arrivals (CDA) using runwaysimulator

Quiz 2 - Solution. Problem #1 (50 points) CEE 5614 Fall Date Due: Wednesday November 20, 2013 Instructor: Trani

Automated Integration of Arrival and Departure Schedules

The Departure Regulator: A Working Paper

CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH Education, Analysis and Research for the Next Frontier. Airport Capacity. Outline/Notes for Class

Evaluation of Strategic and Tactical Runway Balancing*

ARCHERFIELD AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL PAPER TP 03/10 RUNWAY CAPACITY

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

EN-024 A Simulation Study on a Method of Departure Taxi Scheduling at Haneda Airport

Aircraft Arrival Sequencing: Creating order from disorder

NATS LTD. - IN CONFIDENCE

Airport Apron Roundabout Operational Concept and Capacity Evaluation

Modeling the Impact of the A380 on Airport Capacity

ATC-Wake: Integrated Air Traffic Control Wake Vortex Safety and Capacity System

Crosswind dependent separations and update on TBS concept (transitional step)

WakeNet3-Europe Concepts Workshop

RUNWAY OPERATIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE

Airline Passenger Transportation System: Structure and Dynamics. Lance Sherry 04/2101

Impact of systematic factors on delays at Schiphol

Key Purpose & Need Issues

Defining and Managing capacities Brian Flynn, EUROCONTROL

ASDA Session 3: Airport Performance More Punctuality. 11-November-2016 Chris Schneider

Ref. AIM Para AOPA Air Safety Foundation Supported by the FAA Ref. AIM Para Supported by the FAA

OPTIMAL PUSHBACK TIME WITH EXISTING UNCERTAINTIES AT BUSY AIRPORT

Alternative solutions to airport saturation: simulation models applied to congested airports. March 2017

Analysis of ATM Performance during Equipment Outages

Air Transportation Systems Engineering Delay Analysis Workbook

Looking for the Capacity in NGATS

Validation Results of Airport Total Operations Planner Prototype CLOU. FAA/EUROCONTROL ATM Seminar 2007 Andreas Pick, DLR

Regional Jets ,360 A319/ , , , ,780

Master Plan Update Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

SIMMOD Simulation Airfield and Airspace Simulation Report. Oakland International Airport Master Plan Preparation Report. Revised: January 6, 2006

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

Introduction to Airports and Their Characteristics Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Risk-capacity Tradeoff Analysis of an En-route Corridor Model

TAXIWAY AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SCHEDULING: A MODEL AND SOLUTION ALGORITHMS. A Thesis CHUNYU TIAN

Application of Wake Turbulence Separation at London Heathrow. Paul Johnson Development Manager NATS Heathrow

WAKE TURBULENCE SEPARATION MINIMA

CANSO Workshop on Operational Performance. LATCAR, 2016 John Gulding Manager, ATO Performance Analysis Federal Aviation Administration

CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA

1.0 Project Background Mission Statement and Goals Objectives of this Sustainable Master Plan

NextGen Priorities: Multiple Runway Operations & RECAT

Bremerton National Airport Airport Master Plan Project Update February 12, 2013

Wake Turbulence Standards

Review Study on Runway Capacity Parameters and Improvement

A Network Model to Simulate Airport Surface Operations

Air Transportation Infrastructure and Technology: Do We have Enough and Is this the Problem?

ATM Network Performance Report

ATM Network Performance Report

MIT ICAT. Robust Scheduling. Yana Ageeva John-Paul Clarke Massachusetts Institute of Technology International Center for Air Transportation

The Impact of Multiple Runway Aiming Points on Runway Capacity

QUEUEING MODELS FOR 4D AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS. Tasos Nikoleris and Mark Hansen EIWAC 2010

Airport Safety Initiative Networking Session Initiated by the Airport Safety Cluster. Helsinki, IST Event /11/ 2006,16:00-17:30

Potential Procedures to Reduce Departure Noise at Madrid Barajas Airport

2018 Airport Master Plan Overview of Development Concepts. Greg Ballentine (WSP)

PRAJWAL KHADGI Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering Northern Illinois University DeKalb, Illinois, USA

print materials visit information on free live seminars, online courses, and

Appendix. Gatwick Airport Ltd - Further information on Gatwick s revised phasing strategy (including Programme) Gatwick Airport Limited

Application of the reduced runway separation minima at the Sheremetyevo airport RUSSIAN FEDERATION

AIRPORT OF THE FUTURE

IVAO Switzerland Division

An Overview of GMR Megawide Consortium s Unsolicited Proposal. March 2018

System Oriented Runway Management: A Research Update

Cross-sectional time-series analysis of airspace capacity in Europe

The implementation of this Master Plan will be undertaken in logical stages to meet passenger and workforce demands.

Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI) Assisted Visual Separation (CAVS)

Capacity assessment at Dublin Airport for the purpose of setting slot coordination parameters

Airport Master Planning Process & Update

Changing runways at Sydney Airport to share the noise

Nav Specs and Procedure Design Module 12 Activities 8 and 10. European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation

Interval Management A Brief Overview of the Concept, Benefits, and Spacing Algorithms

Future airport concept

CAUTION: WAKE TURBULENCE

DEPARTMENT: CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE / Name: CE2303/ Railway, Airport and Harbors Engineering 2 MARK QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Las Vegas McCarran International Airport. Capacity Enhancement Plan

Transcription:

RUNWAY OPERATIONS: Computing Runway Arrival Capacity SYST 560/460 USE Runway Capacity Spreadsheet Fall 2008 Lance Sherry 1 CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH

Background Air Transportation System Infrastructure is composed of: Airports Airside (runways, taxiways, ramps, ) Landside (terminals, passenger lounges, access roads, rental cars, busses, parking, Air Traffic Control Tower Terminal Area En-route 2

Runway Capacity Definition Assumptions and Notes % of MTC Maximum Throughput Capacity (MTC) Expected number of movements performed in 1 hour Does not violate ATC separation rules Continuous Demand No limits on delays Practical Hourly Capacity (PHCAP) Expected number of movements performed in 1 hour Delay set to average 4 min delay per vehicle Avg of 4 min delay, means some vehciles >> 4 mins Runway capacity achieved when avg delay = 4 mins 80-90% of MTC Declared Capacity Number of movements per hour at a reasonable LOS (i.e. delay minutes = 3 min) Used for Schedule Coordination (in Europe). Sets limit on scheduled arrivals/departures 85-90% of MTC Sustained Capacity Number of movements per hour than can be reasonably sustained over period of several hours Split in Airport Arrival Rate (AAR) and Airport Departure Rate (ADR) 90% of MTC with good weather MTC 100% of MTC with bad weather MTC See deneufville/odoni (2004) pages 370 to 374 3

Runway Operations Arriving aircraft land Departing aircraft takeoff Runway capacity determined by: Separation distance between arriving aircraft Separation Distance Violation Separation distance between departing aircraft Separation Distance Violation Only one aircraft on runway at any time Simultaneous Runway Occupancy Separation distance and Runway Occupancy Time (ROT) determined by aircraft type (weight/lift, landing speed, ) Heavy (e.g. 747-400) Large (e.g. 777, 767) Medium (e.g. 737) Small (e.g. RJ) 4

Runway Arrivals 5

Runway Arrivals 6

Model for Runway Arrivals n Runway 7 n length of final approach i(j) type of leading (trailing) aircraft V i landing speed of aircraft type i (defined as speed on the ground) O i runway occupancy time of aircraft type i S ij minimum separation distance between two airborne aircraft i and j T ij minimum acceptable time interval between successive arrivals at runway of aircraft type i and type j

Homogeneous Fleet MCT = 3600/ROT (Simultaneous Runway Occupancy SRO) MCT = 3600/(S i,j /V j ) (Wake Vortex Sep Distance) MCT = 3600/[(S i,j /V j ) + b] (Wake Vortex + ATC Buffer) 8

Non-Homogeneous Fleet Mix MCT = 3600/E[ROT] (Simultaneous Runway Occupancy SRO) E[ROT] = Σ i Σj (p ij * ROT i ) MCT = 3600/E[T i,j ] (Wake Vortex Sep Distance) E[T i,j ] = Σ i Σj (p ij * (S i,j /V j ) ) MCT = 3600/E[T i,j ] (Wake Vortex + ATC Buffer) E[T i,j ] = Σ i Σj ((p ij * (S i,j /V j ) ) + b ) 9

Separation Distance (nm) Follow (Approach Speed) Lead (Appro ach Speed) H (150) L (130) M (110) S (90) H (150) 4 5 5 6 L (130) 2.5 2.5 2.5 4 M (110) 2.5 2.5 2.5 4 S (90) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 10

Separation (Expanding, Decreasing) Follow Lead H (150) L (130) M (110) S (90) H (150) Same Expanding Expanding Expanding L (130) Decreasing Same Expanding Expanding M (110) Decreasing Decreasing Same Expanding S (90) Decreasing Decreasing Decreasing Same 11

Arrival Two Cases Lead aircraft of type i is faster than follow aircraft of type j Case: Expanding Separation Lead aircraft of type i is slower than follow aircraft of type j Case: Decreasing Separation 12

Expanding Separation (v i > v j ) j s ij i n j > s ij i Runway n/v i (n + s ij )/v j T ij = Minimum Acceptable Time Interval between successive Arrivals max of 1. ((n + s ij )/v j ) (n/v i ) (time for follow aircraft (j) to fly separation distance plus final approach path) (time of lead aircraft (i) to fly final approach path) 2. o i occupancy time of lead aircraft 13 n Runway

NOT DRAWN TO SCALE Constant Separation (v i = v j ) Expanding Separation (v i > v j ) S i,j S i,j S i,j /v j Time Time n i j n i j ((n + sij)/vj) (n/vi) S i,j /v j Rwy Threshold S i,j Rwy Threshold (n/vi) S i,j ((n + sij)/vj) 14 Rwy Exit Rwy Exit Distance o Distance o

Decreasing Separation (v i < v j ) n Runway > s ij s ij T ij = Minimum Acceptable Time Interval between successive Arrivals max of 1. (s ij /v j ) (time for faster follow aircraft (j) to fly separation distance) (time of lead aircraft (i) to fly final approach path) 2. o i occupancy time of lead aircraft 15 n Runway

NOT DRAWN TO SCALE Constant Separation (v i = v j ) Additional spacing Contracting Separation (v i < v j ) S i,j S i,j Time Time n i j n i j S i,j /v j S i,j /v j Rwy Threshold S i,j Rwy Threshold (n/vi) ((n + sij)/vj) S i,j 16 Rwy Exit Rwy Exit Distance o Distance o

Minimum Time Separation Between 2 Aircraft Runway can only have single aircraft at a time Minimum separation distance between arriving aircraft must be maintained at all times T ij > O i minimum acceptable time interval between successive arrivals at runway of lead aircraft type i and follow aircraft type j > runway occupancy time of aircraft type i 17

Mixed Fleet Arrivals Average Minimum Acceptable Inter-arrival Time E[T ij ] = Σ i to K Σ j to K p ij T ij K number of aircraft types K 2 number of aircraft type i followed by aircraft type j (pairs) p ij probability of aircraft type i followed by aircraft type j Maximum Capacity Throughput (MCT) = arrivals/hour = 1/E[T ij ] Assumes continuous supply of arriving aircraft Assumes no arrival queueing delays Sustained Capacity Throughput (SCT) = arrivals/hour = 1/E[T ij + ] = 10 secs = additional distance (padding) used by Air Traffic Controllers to avoid violating separation distance 18

Example Aircraft Type i p i v i o i H 0.2 150 70 L 0.35 130 60 M 0.35 110 55 S 0.1 90 50 S = Follow (j) Lead (i) H L M S H 4 5 5 6 L 2.5 2.5 2.5 4 M 2.5 2.5 2.5 4 S 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 P = Follow (j) Lead (i) H L M S H 0.0 4 0.07 0.07 0.02 L 0.07 0.1225 0.1255 0.035 M 0.07 0.1225 0.1255 0.035 S 0.02 0.035 0.035 0.01 = 10 secs E[Tij] = 116.3 Sustained Capacity Throughput (Arrivals/Hour) = 30.9 aircraft/hours 19

Limitations of Model Model assumes: independent runway (no intersections or parallel) Landing aircraft only Wind speed and direction v i and o i should be random variables Separation distance should be random variables 20