U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Air Traffic Organization Policy

Similar documents
Introduction to Runway Condition Assessment Matrix (RCAM) and Field Condition Reporting

Takeoff And Landing Performance Assessment TALPA. Chris Meyer MnDOT Aeronautics

Takeoff and Landing Performance Assessment (TALPA) Status Briefing March 31, 2016

The Challenge of Surface Conditions. AST: A New Solution to a Global Aviation Problem. Benefits and Business Value to Airports and Operators

Takeoff and Landing Performance Assessment (TALPA)

October 26, EST

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR 13/15

GRANDE PRAIRIE AIRPORT. Reduced Visibility Operations Plan

FAA SAFO Turbojet Braking Performance on Wet Runway SAPOE Recommendations

New ICAO Runway Safety Provisions

JUNEAU RUNWAY INCURSION MITIGATION (RIM) PROGRAM JANUARY 25, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...

IFR SEPARATION USING RADAR

** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION **

VIRTUAL AIR TRAFFIC SIMULATION NETWORK UNITED STATES DIVISION. SUBJ: Phoenix (PHX) Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) Standard Operating Procedures

Runway Condition Assessment: putting data together for enhanced Safety

Appendix A COMMUNICATION BEST PRACTICES

Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Winter Weather Season Kick-Off Meeting

Glossary. Part I Acronyms/Data Terminology. AIFSS -- Automated International Flight Service Station.

Safety Enhancement SE RE Airports Policies and Procedures to Mitigate Runway Excursion Consequences & Severity

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Air Traffic Organization Policy

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. National Policy

TETERBORO AIRPORT CHIEF PILOT MEETING October 29, 2018 at 13:00 EST. Audio call code

Initiated By: AFS-400

Jet Transport Airplane Performance - Briefing For Business Aviation Pilots & Operators

The pilot and airline operator s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options. Session 3 Presentation 1

Appendix F ICAO MODEL RUNWAY INCURSION INITIAL REPORT FORM

TETERBORO AIRPORT CHIEF PILOT MEETING. September 26, 2017 at 11:00 EST Audio call code

SURFACE MOVEMENT GUIDANCE AND CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN. Los Angeles International Airport

July 2008 COMPANY INDOCTRINATION TRAINING 1.0 PURPOSE

Appendix B. Comparative Risk Assessment Form

40 BEALEAFBI OCTOBER Chapter 8 RQ-4 OPERATIONS

CHAPTER 9 FLIGHT INFORMATION SERVICE, ADVISORY SERVICE AND ALERTING SERVICE

[1] Gleim #: Source: AIM Para Learning Statement Code: PLT141

Section 5. Radar Separation

Department of Defense. Federal Aviation Administration. NOTAM Realignment. Gary Prock Date: September 19, 2007

Airports and UAS: Integrating UAS into Airport Infrastructure and Planning

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION National Policy

NOTAM. Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) Fly-In Colorado Springs Airport (COS) Colorado Springs, CO SPECIAL FLIGHT PROCEDURES

Regulations & Obligations

CHAPTER 4 AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES

5.1 Approach Hazards Awareness - General

Effective: CANBERRA AIRPORT (YSCB) LIGHTING UPGRADE AND STOP BAR INSTALLATION RUNWAY 17/35 AND RUNWAY 12/30

Source: Chippewa Valley Regional Airport ASOS, Period of Record

Amendment 13 to Annex 14, Volume I

SID/STAR phraseology FAQ Canadian implementation April 27, 2017

How to be Prepared for an Airport Emergency and What to Look for When Inspecting Your Airfield

The French TALPA Trial Results of Winter

Runway Surface Conditions Assessment & Reporting A pilot s perspective

Manual of Radiotelephony

Anchorage ARTCC Phraseology Guide. Clearance Delivery Operations

Chapter 6. Nonradar. Section 1. General DISTANCE

Safety Enhancement RNAV Safe Operating and Design Practices for STARs and RNAV Departures

Part 172 Air Traffic Service Organisations Certification, Amendment 2. Contents

National Transportation Safety Board Washington, D.C

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

Chapter 16. Airports Authority of India Manual of Air Traffic Services Part RESPONSIBILITY IN REGARD TO MILITARY TRAFFIC

The pilot and airline operator s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options. Session 2 Presentation 2

1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

ERIE ATCT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Contents. Subpart A General 91.1 Purpose... 7

LOW VISIBILITY PROCEDURE KEMPEGOWDA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, BENGALURU (VOBL)

Advisory Circular. File No.: Z U Issue No.: 01

Advisory Circular. En Route Area Navigation Operations RNAV 5 (Formerly B-RNAV) Aviation Safety Regulatory Framework Document No.

Available On-Board Technologies For Runway Excursions Prevention

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

1) Rescind the MOD (must meet the standard); 2) Issue a new MOD which reaffirms the intent of the previous MOD; 3) Issue a new MOD with revisions.

Second ICAO Global Runway Safety Symposium, Lima, Peru, November 2017 Panel 3 - Root causes of runway accidents and incidents David Gamper,

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. National Policy

RECOMMENDED GUIDANCE FOR FPL AND RELATED ATS MESSAGES

Airport 20 to 1 Approach Surface

AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

Related Rules This Advisory Circular relates specifically to CAR Part 175-Aeronautical Information Services Organisations Certification.

Contaminated Runways. Getting it stopped perfectly with imperfect information on an imperfect surface

Safety Enhancement 186R3.2 TCAS-Sensitivity Level Command

APPENDIX D FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATIONS, PART 77

Advisory Circular CT

THE CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF THAILAND. Aeronautical Information Service Department AIP SUPPLEMENT

Runway Excursion 2018 projects ALTA 2018

Brief in Support. ( Airport ) where Air Traffic Control ( ATC ) advised United Airlines flight 1112 to divert to

Front Line Managers (FLMs) and Airline Pilots Training for Operational Evaluation! of enhanced Final Approach Runway Occupancy Signal (efaros) at DFW!

Civil/Military Coordination Workshop Havana, Cuba April 2015

EFFECTIVE NOTAM KOUN SPECIAL FLIGHT PROCEDURES 09/08 NORMAN, OK

[Docket No. FAA ; Airspace Docket No. 13-ASW-2] Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Fort Polk, LA

Ground movement safety systems and procedures - an overview

a. Aeronautical charts DID THIS IN LESSON 2

Part 135 Recurrency (B)

Terms of Reference for rulemaking task RMT.0704

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

Part 101 Gyrogliders and Parasails, Unmanned Aircraft (Including Balloons), Kites, and Rockets Operating Rules

Related Rules This Advisory Circular relates specifically to Civil Aviation Rule Part (b)

Date: 6/1/07 Initiated by: AJR-1

Modification of VOR Federal Airway V-170 in the Vicinity of Devils Lake, ND

CERTIFICATE OF WAIVER OR AUTHORIZATION

Implementation of the new CNS/ATM systems in the region

Aerodrome Safety. H.V. SUDARSHAN International Civil Aviation Organization

Subject: Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Operations and Operational Authorization

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Draft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /

Transcription:

NOTICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Air Traffic Organization Policy N JO 7110.720 Effective Date: October 1, 2016 Cancellation Date: April 27, 2017 SUBJ: Takeoff and Landing Performance Assessment (TALPA) 1. Purpose of This Notice. The purpose of this notice is to prescribe guidance pertaining to braking action PIREPS, issuing Runway Condition Codes (RwyCC), and use of the new Runway Condition Assessment Matrix (RCAM) for air traffic operations during periods when runway environments are contaminated (wet, snow, ice, slush, etc.). 2. Audience. This notice applies to the Air Traffic Organization (ATO) service units: Air Traffic Services, Mission Support Services, and System Operations; Department of Defense (DOD) air traffic facilities, and all associated Terminal, En route, and Federal Contracted air traffic control facilities. 3. Where Can I Find This Notice? This notice is available on the MyFAA employee Web site at https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_notices/ and on the air traffic publications Web site at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. 4. Procedures. a. FAA Order JO 7110.65. Amend the following paragraphs to read as follows: 1-2-6. ABBREVIATIONS As used in this order, the following abbreviations have the following meanings indicated. (See Table 1-2-1). TBL 1-2-1 Abbreviations AAR through FDP, no change FICON Field Condition FIR through RCLS, no change RCR Runway Condition Report RE through RVV, no change RwyCC Runway Condition Code Distribution: Electronic Initiated By: AJV-8 Air Traffic Procedures Terminal Procedures

2-9-3. CONTENT Title through h2, no change. i. Runway Condition Codes (RwyCC) when provided. Include the time of the report. PHRASEOLOGY RUNWAY (number) condition code (first value, second value, third value) AT (time). Runway Two Seven, condition code two, two, one at one zero one eight Zulu. FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 3 3 5, Braking Action Advisories. j, no change k. When all 3 runway segments are reporting a code of 6, airport management will notify ATC that runway condition codes are no longer reportable. 3-3-4. BRAKING ACTION Re-letter as l through n Furnish quality of braking action, as received from pilots, to all aircraft as follows: a. Describe the quality of braking action using the terms good, good to medium, medium,, medium to poor, poor, or nil. If the pilot reports braking action in other than the approved terms, ask him/her to categorize braking action in these terms. The term nil is used to indicate bad or no braking action. b. Include type of aircraft from which the report is received. Braking action medium, reported by a heavy Boeing Seven-Sixty-Seven. Braking action poor, reported by a Boeing Seven Thirty Seven. c. If the braking action report affects only a portion of a runway, obtain enough information from the pilot to describe the braking action in terms easily understood by other pilots. Braking action poor first half of runway, reported by a Boeing Seven-Fifty-Seven. Braking action good to medium beyond the intersection of Runway Two Seven, reported by an Airbus Three-Twenty- One. Descriptive terms, such as the first or the last half of the runway, should normally be used rather than landmark descriptions, such as opposite the fire station, south of a taxiway, etc. Landmarks extraneous to the landing runway are difficult to distinguish during low visibility, at night, or anytime a pilot is busy landing an aircraft. d. Furnish runway condition codes, as received from airport management, to aircraft via the ATIS when any 1 or more runway condition codes are reported as less than 6. 2

1. Use the runway number, followed by the runway condition code for each of the three runway segments, and include the time of report. Do not issue RwyCC values when all three segments of the runway are reporting values of 6. Runway two seven, condition code two, two, three at one zero one eight Zulu. 2. Issue the runway condition code (RwyCC), when provided, to all aircraft. Runway two-seven, condition code two, two, three. REFERENCE - Advisory Circular AC 150/5200-30D Airport Winter Safety and Operations 3. Issue FICON NOTAMs upon pilot request, workload permitting. 3-3-5. BRAKING ACTION ADVISORIES a. When runway braking action reports are received from pilots which include the terms medium, poor, or nil, or whenever weather conditions are conducive to deteriorating or rapidly changing runway conditions, include on the ATIS broadcast the statement Braking Action Advisories are in effect. FAAO JO 7210.3, Para 10 4 1, Automatic Terminal Information Service (ATIS). b through b2 PHRASEOLOGY, no change 3. Advise airport management that runway braking action reports of good to medium, medium, medium to poor, poor, or nil have been received. FAAO JO 7210.3, Para 4 3 1, Letters of Agreement. b4, no change c. Include RwyCC, and the time of the report, as received from airport management on the ATIS. Furnish the information when requested by the pilot in accordance with para 3 3 4, Braking Action. 3-9-1. DEPARTURE INFORMATION Title through f, no change g. Issue braking action for the runway in use as received from pilots when Braking Action Advisories are in effect. 3-10-1. LANDING INFORMATION 3

Title through i, no change j. Issue braking action for the runway in use as received from pilots when Braking Action Advisories are in effect. 4-7-12. AIRPORT CONDITIONS Title through a, no change 1. Airport conditions information, in the provision of en route approach control service, does not include information pertaining to the airport surface environment other than the landing area(s) or obstruction information for aircraft that will be cleared for an instrument approach. Accordingly, FICON NOTAMs that contain the keywords TAXIWAY (TWY), RAMP, APRON, or SERVICE (SVC) are not required to be issued. Additionally, Obstruction NOTAMs (OBST) are not required to be issued if an aircraft will be cleared for an instrument approach. 2. When advised of special use airspace (SUA) or military training route (MTR) activation, appropriate action is taken to separate nonparticipating IFR aircraft from those activities when required, and/or to issue applicable advisories as warranted. When meeting this requirement, there is no requirement for controllers to additionally issue the associated D NOTAM activating that SUA or MTR to the pilot. Accordingly, D NOTAMs for SUA that contain the accountability codes SUAE, SUAC, and SUAW are not required to be issued. b, no change c. TERMINAL. Where runway condition codes (Rwy CC) are provided, transmit this information to all aircraft in accordance with one of the following. c1 through c3, no change 4. As soon as possible after receipt of any subsequent changes in previously issued RwyCC information. d. Issue FICON NOTAMs upon pilot request, workload permitting. b. Pilot/Controller Glossary. Amend the following definitions to read as follows: BRAKING ACTION (GOOD, GOOD TO MEDIUM, MEDIUM, MEDIUM TO POOR, POOR, OR NIL) A report of conditions on the airport movement area providing a pilot with a degree/quality of braking to expect. Braking action is reported in terms of good, good to medium, medium, medium to poor, poor, or nil. (See RUNWAY CONDITION REPORT) (See RUNWAY CONDITION CODE) BRAKING ACTION ADVISORIES When tower controllers receive runway braking action reports which include the terms medium, poor, or nil, or whenever weather conditions are conducive to deteriorating or rapidly changing runway braking conditions, the tower will include on the ATIS broadcast the statement, Braking Action Advisories are in Effect. During the time braking action advisories are in effect, ATC will issue the most current braking action report for the runway in use to each arriving and departing aircraft. Pilots should be prepared for deteriorating braking conditions and should request current runway condition information if not issued by controllers. Pilots should also be prepared to provide a descriptive runway condition report to controllers after landing. RUNWAY CONDITION CODE Numerical readings, provided by airport management, that indicate runway surface contamination (for example, slush, ice, rain, etc.). These values range from 1 (poor) to 6 4

(dry) and must be included on the ATIS when the reportable condition is less than 6 in any one or more of the three runway zones (touchdown, midpoint, rollout). RUNWAY CONDITION REPORT A data collection worksheet used by airport management that correlates the runway percentage of coverage along with the depth and type of contaminant for the purpose of creating a FICON NOTAM. (See RUNWAY CONDITION CODE) RwyCC - (See Runway Condition Code) 5. Distribution. This notice is distributed to the following ATO service units: Air Traffic Services, Mission Support Services, and System Operations, and Safety and Technical Training; the Air Traffic Safety Oversight Service; the William J. Hughes Technical Center; and the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, and all Department of Defense air traffic control facilities. 6. Background. In December 2005, a Boeing 737-700 experienced a runway excursion (overrun) while attempting to land at Chicago Midway (MDW) during winter conditions. As a result of this runway excursion, the FAA established an internal team to review related FAA regulations, policies, and industry practices in an effort to develop mitigation strategies designed to reduce/eliminate these occurrences. The result was a group known as Takeoff and Landing Performance Assessment (TALPA). TALPA found deficiencies in multiple areas, most notably in the lack of a standardized method to assess landing performance during arrival, and particularly when airport conditions had changed while en route. The FAA is proposing operators to conduct a landing performance assessment, while en route, and with this decision, the terms associated with this assessment and the methods used to transmit these conditions requires updating. The goal of TALPA is to standardize runway contamination reporting throught the NAS and to harmonize with ICAO procedures. Original signed by Heather Hemdal Heather Hemdal 8/31/2016 Director, Air Traffic Procedures Mission Support Services Date Signed 5