**Based on Queries from the participating teams, Rules may be revised/ edited / clarified as deemed appropriate by the organizing committee.

Similar documents
Human Powered Flight THE KREMER HUMAN-POWERED AIRCRAFT FOR SPORT

Accident Prevention Program

SPEEDFEST IX ALPHA CLASS

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Control Line Special Events

REPORT IN-038/2010 DATA SUMMARY

China Aeromodelling Design Challenge. Contest Rules China Aeromodelling Design Challenge Page 1 of 14

GAMA/Build A Plane 2017 Aviation Design Challenge

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

Wayne Modelers Safety Rules.

First Person View Proficiency Test Guide. Revised 13/03/2018

AIRWORTHINESS CERTIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT AND RELATED PRODUCTS. 1. PURPOSE. This change is issued to incorporate revised operating limitations.

Policies for Certification, operation and maintenance of UAS Andres Eduardo Parra Catama Air Safety Inspector Civil Aviation Authority of Colombia

LESSON PLAN Introduction (3 minutes)

FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL (FLTOPSP)

2013 Taiwan Innovative Unmanned Aircraft Design Competition

University Architect & VP for Facilities Policy & Procedure #30

Pre-Solo Written Exam

General Arrival / Safety Briefing

SPEED RALLY NAVIGATION CHALLENGE RULES AND REGULATIONS

FLIGHT AND OPERATING MANUAL SUPPLEMENT FMS305902, REVISION 1 SEAPLANES WEST INC.

Private Pilot Flight Training

CESSNA SECTION 5 PERFORMANCE

Feasibility of Battery Backup for Flight Recorders

Weight Arm Moment. Empty Airplane Front Seats. Back Seats. Fuel. Baggage TOTAL

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

FLIGHT ENDURANCE. Participants analyze flight principles with rubber band powered model aircraft.

Table of Contents Subject Page Paragraph

RE: Draft AC , titled Determining the Classification of a Change to Type Design

(i) Adopted or adapted airworthiness and environmental standards;

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

CRUISE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Fly Quiet Report. 3 rd Quarter November 27, Prepared by:

Short Course. Aircraft Design

Cost-Effective Flight Test Training Using In-House Resources: An application to the HAF Academy

GENERAL ARRIVAL BRIEFING SAFECON 2016 KOSU

2.1 General Characteristics. 2.2 General Dimensions. 2.3 Ground Clearances. 2.4 Interior Arrangements. 2.5 Cabin Cross Sections

ENGINEERS FLYING CLUB OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA OPERATIONS MANUAL

NOTE: DATA PRELIMINARY

Pre-Solo and BFR Written

RUAT Junior Glider Design Competition Version 1.5

2005 Aero Design East and West Rules

Noise Abatement Arrival Procedures at Louisville International Airport. Prof. John-Paul Clarke Georgia Institute of Technology

RNP AR APCH Approvals: An Operator s Perspective

SAFETY REGULATIONS FOR FIXED/ROTARY WING MODEL AIRCRAFT GAS TURBINES

IRELAND SAFETY REGULATION DIVISION IRISH AVIATION AUTHORITY AVIATION HOUSE HAWKINS STREET DUBLIN 2 Tel Fax AFTN EIDWYOYX

Standard Operating Procedures for UAS at CSU Channel Islands

fll,' The University of Georgia O tfo:c o f rh.: Vu:.: Pre,id.:nt for Research

Chapter 5 Center of Gravity Change After Repair or Alteration

Current Rules Part 175 Aeronautical Information Service Organisations - Certification Pending Rules

Standard Operating Procedures and Guidelines for North Texas Drone User Group

Valley Fliers 1402 Auburn Way North, #223 Auburn WA 98002

CHG 0 9/13/2007 VOLUME 2 AIR OPERATOR AND AIR AGENCY CERTIFICATION AND APPLICATION PROCESS

INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATIONS. Agenda Item: B.5.12 IFATCA 09 WP No. 94

THE CIVIL AVIATION ACT (No. 21 of 2013 THE CIVIL AVIATION (OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS, 2015

Approved Check Pilot (ACP) / Advanced Qualification Program (AQP) Evaluator Bulletin No. 01/18

AIRWORTHINESS ADVISORY CIRCULAR

AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

STUDENT INFORMATION Name LAST FIRST MIDDLE Address City State ZIP Telephone. Pilot Cert. TYPE CERT # DATE ISSUED Emergency Contact Phone Relationship

British Model Flying Association 2018 University and Schools Flight Challenges. Dates Notice. 1st, 2nd, 3rd June 2018

AIRCRAFT SERIOUS INCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT

SECTION B AIRWORTHINESS CERTIFICATION

MODEL AERONAUTICAL ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA

Analysis of Operational Impacts of Continuous Descent Arrivals (CDA) using runwaysimulator

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)

NASA S SPACE GRANT MIDWEST HIGH-POWER ROCKET COMPETITION THE ROLL/ORIENTATION CHALLENGE

FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR FLIGHT

LEAP LEADERSHIP RESUME/INTERVIEW

Chapter 6. Airports Authority of India Manual of Air Traffic Services Part 1

Aircraft Maintenance Organisations - Certification. Contents

REPORT A-024/2012 DATA SUMMARY

Contracting of continuing airworthiness management tasks

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

This advisory circular relates specifically to Civil Aviation Rule Part 21, Subpart I Special Flight Permits.

FAI Sporting Code. Section 11 Humanpowered Aircraft CLASS I Edition Approved by the FAI Air Sport General Commission (CASI) on October 13, 2011

Global Civil and Military Simulation & Training Market ( Edition) July 2017

F I N A L R E P O R T ON SERIOUS INCIDENT OF THE AIRCRAFT SR-20, REGISTRATION D-ELLT, WHICH OCCURED ON MAY , AT ZADAR AIRPORT

INTERNATIONAL FIRE TRAINING CENTRE

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport

Weight and Balance User Guide

GBSC PRE-SOLO WRITTEN QUIZ

for the Air Cargo Challenge 2013

Guidance for Usage of Issue Papers

SAFECON 2015 GENERAL ARRIVAL BRIEFING KOSU

EXPERIMENTAL OPERATING LIMITATIONS EXHIBITION GROUP I1

PRELIMINARY OCCURRENCE REPORT

Wake Turbulence Research Modeling

FIJI ISLANDS AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR

Guidelines for Evaluation of Quality Control for Manufacturing

IT S NOT ALL BAD NEWS

Aeronautical Studies (Safety Risk Assessment)

St. Paul Downtown Airport (STP)

FEDERATION AERONAUTIQUE INTERNATIONAL NATIONAL AERONAUTIC ASSOCIATION

ScienceDirect. Prediction of Commercial Aircraft Price using the COC & Aircraft Design Factors

UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM USE

Location: 2. It shows on at least two more places an example of the principle of dichotomy,

CAR AIR CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS (GENERAL AVIATION OPERATIONS)

Instrument Proficiency Check Flight Record

Transcription:

2015/16 DBF Competition College of Aeronautical Engineering PAF Academy Risalpur National University of Science and Technology Rules Posting: 31 December 2015 **Based on Queries from the participating teams, Rules may be revised/ edited / clarified as deemed appropriate by the organizing committee.** Summary: College of Aeronautical Engineering at PAF Academy, Risalpur is arranging DBF competition for the first time. The aim of the competition is to nurture engineering design capabilities among engineering students of universities from all over Pakistan to be later invited to participate in the challenging design competition at PAF Academy, Risalpur. Judging: Students must design, document, fabricate, and demonstrate the aircraft they determine to be capable of achieving the highest score on the specified mission profile(s). Flight scores will be based on the demonstrated mission performance obtained during the contest. Each team must also submit a written Design Report. A maximum of 100 points will be awarded for the team design report. Scores for the written reports will be announced during the fly-off. The overall team score is a combination of the Design Report and Flight scores. The team with the highest overall team score will be declared the winner. Contest Site: Host for the competition will be College of Aeronautical Engineering, PAF Academy Risalpur. You can check on historical weather conditions at www.weatherbase.com or www.weatherunderground.com. Team Requirements: All students must be full time students at an accredited University or College. At least 1/3 of the team members must consist of freshman, sophomores or juniors.

Sponsorship: Teams may solicit and accept sponsorship in the form of funds or materials and components from commercial organizations. All design, analysis and fabrication of the contest entry is the sole responsibility of the student team members. Communications: Teams for their queries can contact undermentioned emails and contact numbers Faculty Coordinator: Dr Liaquat Ullah Iqbal Professor and Head, Industrial Engineering Department College of Aeronautical Engineering National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST) Risalpur, KPK, Pakistan Cell: +923213999275 Student coordinator: M Aqib Zulfiqar Email: aqb.ahmd@gmail.com Cell: +923460431154 M Hassaan Siddique Email: hssnsidiq@yahoo.com Cell: +923345556606 Aircraft and Battery Type Requirements Only fixed wing, propeller driven, electric airplane will be allowed. Parafoils, rotary wings or any variants of quad- hexrotors etc are not permitted. Only NiCd or NiMH batteries are allowed. LiPOs are NOT Allowed. Mission General Specification:

Missions must be flown in order as described below. Upon completion of all TWO missions, teams may at their option attempt a single re-flight of each of the flight missions previously flown. The larger of the two flight scores for each mission will count toward the total mission score. Normal queuing procedures will be used. All payloads must be secured sufficiently to assure safe flight without possible variation of aircraft cg outside of design limits during flight. Assembly/flight line crew is limited to pilot, observer and 1 ground crew. Scoring measurement units are feet, lbs, and seconds. Mission Sequence and safety requirement: Missions: The three Flight Missions must be flown in order. A new mission cannot be flown until the team has obtained a successful score for the preceding mission. Aircraft must be designed to be capable of performing all required missions. o Aircraft must pass the wing tip load test with the largest payload loading intended to fly for any mission. o The maximum load demonstrated will be recorded and cannot be altered after completing tech inspection. Only the assembly crew member, pilot and pilot assistant may go to and enter the staging box. o After the checkout is complete the assembly crew member may be swapped for a different flight line crew member if desired. Aircraft will use ground rolling take-off and landing o Takeoff field length will be limited to 100 ft. The initial upwind turn on the first lap of each mission will occur after passing the turn judge (signaled by raising a flag). The aircraft must remain in unaided visual control distance of the pilot at all times. The Flight Line Judge may require turns to be made to remain in a safe visual control range at his discretion. Aircraft must complete a successful landing at the end of each mission for the mission to receive a score. Successful landing means that aircraft touch down the runway and must not bounce off the runway. Flight Mission 1 Ferry Flight No payload installed Take off within the prescribed limit Maximum number of laps to be completed in 4 minutes flight time Time start when the throttle is advanced for the first take-off A lap is complete when the aircraft passes over the start or finish line in air Mission score; N_laps_flown_by_team M1 = maximum_lap_flown_by_any_team

Flight Mission 2 Tennis ball carrying mission Take off within the prescribed field length All payload and supporting equipment must be secured internally Internal is defined as completely enclosed by airplane structure/skin No part may be exposed to free stream air 3 lap timed flight with payload Payload is regular tennis ball Minimum no. of balls a team can carry is 4 Maximum number depends upon team decision There must be supporting frame to keep balls intact so that design cg of airplane does not change Mission score: number_ball_carried_by_team MF2 = maximum_number_balls_carried_anyteam **Must complete a successful landing to get a score Scoring: Scoring of the competition will be done by following formula Total score = wrriten report score flight score RAC RAC = Empty weight battery weight Empty weight = weight of aircraft ready to fly with propulsion battery installed Battery weight = it includes the weight of batteries installed for propulsion system. Flight Course: The orientation (direction) of the flight course will be adjusted based on the prevailing winds as determined by the Flight Line Judge. The flight course will be positioned to maintain the greatest possible safety to personnel and facilities. The nominal flight course is shown in the Figure below.

Protest Procedure: Teams may submit a protest to the Contest Administration at any time during the competition. Protests may not be submitted after the conclusion of the competition. Decision of the judges will be final. Design Report: Each team will submit a design report as outlined below. Teams will bring the printed form of their design report to the competition venue. Reports will be scored on a 100 point basis following the guidelines outlined below. All information used for scoring must be in the outlined sections, content that is out of sequence, including the drawing package, will be treated as missing and scored accordingly. All reports should be at least one and one half line spacing, 10-pt Arial font. Tables and figures will also be at least 10-pt Arial font. Margins should be at least 1 inch on all sides. All figures and tables should be clear and readable for the judges. The reports will be judged on format and readability. ALL items requested below should be present, easy to locate and identify, well documented and in the correct section for full scoring. Teams are requested to bring the printed copy of design reports for scoring to the fly off venue. Viva voce will be conducted during fly off days and score will be given on basis of viva voce and presentation of work.

Design Report rubric All section scores will include format, completeness and readability 1. Executive Summary: (10 points): Provide a summary description of your selected design and why it is the best solution to the specified mission requirements. describe your key mission requirements and design features keyed to those requirements. Document the performance/capabilities of your system solution. 2. Management Summary (5 points): Describe the organization of the design team. Provide a chart of design personnel and assignment areas. Provide a milestone chart showing planned and actual timing of the design / fabrication / testing processes. 3. Conceptual Design (20 points): Describe mission requirements (problem statement). Translate mission requirements into design requirements. Review solution concepts/configurations considered. Describe concept weighting, selection process and results. 4. Preliminary Design (20 points): Describe design/analysis methodology Document design/sizing trades Describe/document mission model (capabilities and uncertainties) Provide estimates of the aircraft lift, drag and stability characteristics. Provide estimates of the aircraft mission performance. 5. Detail Design (25 points total. 15 points for discussion items, 10 points for drawing package): Document dimensional parameters of final design. Document structural characteristics/capabilities of final design. Document systems and sub-systems design/component selection/integration/architecture. Document Weight and Balance for final design. Must include a Weight & Balance table for the empty aircraft and with each of the possible payloads Document flight performance parameters for final design. Document mission performance for final design. Drawing Package 3-View drawing with dimensions. Structural arrangement drawing. Systems layout/location drawing. Payload(s) accommodation drawing(s). 6. Manufacturing Plan and processes (5 points):

Document the process selected for manufacture of major components and assemblies of the final design. Detail the manufacturing processes investigated and the selection process/results. Include a manufacturing milestone chart showing scheduled and actual event timings. 7. Testing Plan (5 points): Detail testing objectives, schedules, and check-lists. 8. Performance Results (10 points): describe the demonstrated performance of key subsystems and compare it to predictions from Section 5. Explain any differences and improvements made. describe the demonstrated performance of your complete aircraft solution and compare it to predictions from Section5. Explain any differences and improvements made.