Workplace Population: Key Facts

Similar documents
2011 Census Snapshot: Migration flows

356,500 people commuted to jobs in the City of London. 40 per cent from inner London, 29 per cent from outer London, 31 per cent from outside London

CHAIN Data Analysis. Mmmm. July-September 2016

Where did London s jobs go? Paul Convery LEPU October 11 th 2005

London and Domestic Tourism

Population analysis of North West London for John Lyon s Charity

2017 Rough Sleeping Statistics An analysis of 2017 rough sleeping counts and estimates

2011 Census Update: Online Completion in London

Freedom of Information Request Reference No: I note you seek access to the following information:

CBRE Hot winners in London s residential market

Homelessness in London. Simon Cribbens Senior Policy Officer

S31 Grant determination for a high needs strategic planning fund in : DCLG ref 31/2916

ASELB MEMBERS DIRECTORY

ASELB MEMBERS DIRECTORY

School improvement monitoring and brokering grant provisional allocations for illustrative purposes

Planned Expenditure by Local Authorities: Services for Young People

Numbers achieving 3 A grades in specific A-Level combinations by school type and LEA

Most regions saw price falls during 2012

House prices fall in most regions during the third quarter

PQ Local Authorities with exceedances of NO 2 annual mean limit value (based on 2015

Q Embargoed until March 2010

Innovation Workshop with switch2

Annex F - Positive Action Central Team Events 2002/3. REG/MORSE Reference

DAGENHAM. Major residential led mixed use development

House prices in London continue to climb

Healthwatch is the independent champion for people who use health and social care services.

Greater London house prices per square metre stall for first time in eight years

Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in London

LoLEG - London Lighting Engineers Group

London Labour Councils. On the side of Londoners. Launch of the London Local Elections Campaign: Briefing

Council Tax since

Happiness is a town called Harrogate destination named happiest place to live for THIRD year running

*** STRICTLY EMBARGOED UNTIL 7.00AM THURSDAY 2 APRIL 2009 *** Price falls across all regions in Q1 2009

Elizabeth line readiness Maximising opportunity across London s West End

APPENDIX 1 LIST OF PLANNING POLICY DOCUMENTS

2016-BASED HOUSEHOLD PROJECTIONS

A report for the Greater London Authority by Julie Rugg and Nicholas Pleace, Cemetery Research Group, University of York

Council Performance Ratings 2010

20 s Plenty for Us...making your place a better place to be

Local Authority Parking Finances in England

KHAN S 1.9 BILLION EXPERIMENT. Who will he tax? What will he cut?

CITY IN THE WEST. 210,000 homes 310,000 jobs 600,000 Londoners

CoStar Awards Submission Criteria & Market Boundaries

This table is available in large print. Please contact Peabody Direct on

APPENDIX 1: STAKEHOLDERS ENGAGED ON IPA DESIGN PRINCIPLES

For information. The information in this circular does not affect the content of the HB Guidance Manual.

Identifying Pro-Growth Locations in England. May 2018

Identifying Pro-Growth Locations in England. June 2018

Results summary. londonyouthgames.org. Please scroll down to see FULL results. Competition Date: Sunday 20 th May. Competition Name: Trampolining

Area1 Area Code Cut-off Date In Bank Date Area North East Essex. 28th 14th Mid Essex South East Essex

1. On-street income, expenditure and income from penalty charges. 2. Off-street income, expenditure 3. Total transport income, expenditure

AUTHORITY Central Bedfordshire Bedford Mid and South Bedfordshire Luton Bracknell Forest Reading Slough W Berkshire Windsor & Maidenhead Wokingham

RAC Foundation for Motoring Local Authority Parking Finances in England

An Outstanding Retail, Restaurant and Leisure Opportunity in Ealing

2018 TOWN HALL RICH LIST. Theo Hutchinson April 2018

APPENDIX AVAILABLE ON REQUEST

London s growth deal:

NHS South Warwickshire CCG

Annex 3: CCGs confirmed for waves 1, 2, 3 and 4 for authorisation

Census Briefing Paper One. Housing Tenure Structure in England (2001)

Scrappage for Equality

London. focus on. Gwyneth Edwards

Housing transactions pause for summer holidays

STAMP IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS

Specialised perinatal community team that meets Perinatal Quality Network Standards Type 1

Swine Flu Weekly Vaccine Uptake 2009/10 - Frontline HCWs (Primary Care Organisations) Week 4 w/e 31/01/2010 For organisations under HPA

Profile west. Impressive modern office environment. Excellent national and international access.

MILLION POUND HOUSE SALES ON THE RISE

Average house price in England and Wales in June stood at 303,960

House Price Index Monthly Change % Annual Change % Annual % (excluding London & the SE) 304,

APPENDIX 8. Leeds Socio-Economic Baseline Report. Report. July Metro and Leeds City Council

House prices end the year up 0.2%

STATION ROAD HARROW HA1 2DX. Well Secured, Prominent, Greater London Retail Investment Opportunity

Suitability of the subsurface for infiltration SuDS in Great Britain

House prices edge up in January

BBC Local Democracy Reporter allocation

Eight of 10 UK regions record new peak average prices, with the West Midlands taking the top spot for regional annual price growth

London living 2018 A borough by borough review

Editorial text from Grand Union Alliance Report of First Old Oak Common & Park Royal Charette, held in Brent on 15 November 2014:

Average house price in England and Wales now 302,251

Number of first-time buyers highest since 2007 despite deposits doubling

Considering Access to Healthcare Services Bus Planning

Regional peaks while London slowdown persists

England screening uptake rates

Colas Ltd at the heart of London

Under embargo until 00:01 Monday 16th October 2017 September 2017

West London Economic Assessment

Mark Sesnan Managing Director, GLL (Greenwich Leisure Ltd)

The new North-South divide

Summary of the first meeting in the fifth series of TEN Swiss Cottage, Camden

Focused on partnership

Go West: West and Central Scotland house prices per square metre fastest growing over last five years

Proforma Portfolio Summary Big Yellow Stores

Employment characteristics of UK tourism industries in 2008

Slow but steady. Under embargo until 00:01 Monday 17th September 2018 August 2018

ISSUE 40 OCTOBER 2016 MOVING AHEAD CROSSRAIL PROJECT OCTOBER UPDATE. Andrew Wolstenholme CEO Crossrail Ltd

Future Economy. Future Econo. Conditions for Growth. Conditions for Growth. Growth for Business. Growth for Business. Isles of Scilly.

Slowdown in prices but some regions show resilience

Three in a row for Hart as it hangs on to title of best place to live

Virgin Media Street Works Contact List

Transcription:

: Key Facts May 2014 Introduction Friday 23 rd May saw release 5.2 of 2011 Census data. Included in this release were the first statistics on the workplace population and the first data provided at the new workplace zone geography. This Key Facts paper outlines headline findings from the data release as well as providing an overview of the workplace zone geography itself. Key Findings London s workplace population increased by 18 per cent between 2001 and 2011, from 3.8 million to 4.5 million. 17 per cent of usual residents working in England & Wales were employed in London, an increase of one per cent over 2001 figures. The areas of highest worker density in London were in City of London, Westminster and Canary Wharf. In Outer London the highest densities were seen in town centres. The City of London had a density of 1230.9 workers per hectare in 2011, the highest of any local authority in England & Wales. The proportion of the workplace population in London cycling to work almost doubled over the decade, from 78,800 (two per cent) in 2001 to 158,600 (four per cent) in 2011. There was a five percentage point increase in part-time workers in London over the intercensal period. In 2001, 19 per cent (704,500) of people working in London worked 30 hours or less; this figure increased to 24 per cent (1.07 million) in 2011. The average distance travelled to work by people working in London was almost three kilometres more than the England and Wales average at 14.6km, compared with 11.8km nationally. GLA Intelligence 1

Workplace Zones Workplace zones are a new geography created using data from the 2011 Census. They are designed specifically to be used with workplace-based statistics and outputs. Output areas were created for the analysis of population statistics using the resident population of an area. As a result, they are of limited use for workplace statistics as there is no consistency in the number of workers or businesses contained within an output area. Workplace zones were created by splitting and merging 2011 output areas to produce zones which contain a consistent number of workers. Workplace zones are constrained to MSOA boundaries to allow for comparisons with other datasets including workplace data from the 2001 Census. More information on the ONS methodology for creating workplace zones can be found here: http://data.gov.uk/dataset/workplace-zones-ew-2011-population-weighted-centroids Population Base The data published in Release 5.2a of 2011 Census statistics provide information on usual residents aged 16 to 74 in employment in a specified area in the week before the census. There were 4.5 million usual residents aged 16 to 74 employed in London in 2011. Sub-region Classification For the purposes of analysis in this paper boroughs have been grouped as follows: Central: City of London, Camden, Kensington and Chelsea, Tower Hamlets, Westminster Rest of Inner: Hackney, Hammersmith & Fulham, Haringey, Islington, Lambeth, Lewisham, Newham, Southwark, Wandsworth Outer: Barking and Dagenham, Barnet, Bexley, Brent, Bromley, Croydon, Ealing, Enfield, Greenwich, Harrow, Havering, Hillingdon, Hounslow, Kingston upon Thames, Merton, Redbridge, Richmond upon Thames, Sutton, Waltham Forest Workplace Zones in London Workplace Zone Area (ha) Workplace Zone Population Number of Workplace Zones in a borough 1,075 Largest 9.23 11,403 Bromley Tower Hamlets Westminster Smallest 0.08 103 114 Westminster Westminster Barking & Dagenham Average 19.6 552 247 The large range in population of Workplace Zones is a result of the way in which the zones are created and the rules around disclosure of data on individuals and businesses. GLA Intelligence 2

Overview The total workplace population of England & Wales in 2011 was 26.41 million; a rise of twelve per cent from the population in 2001 (of 23.53 million). Of these, 17 per cent (4.5 million) were working in London. London s workplace population increased by 18 per cent over the intercensal period, from 3.8 million in 2001 to 4.5 million in 2011. 41 per cent (1.84 million) of the working population in London worked in Outer London, 35 per cent (1.56 million) in Central London, and 24 per cent (1.1 million) in the Rest of Inner London. There was a two percentage point smaller proportion of the London workplace population working in Outer London in 2011 than 2001 (41 and 43 per cent respectively). Shares of people working in Central London remained around the same across the decade, and the Rest of Inner area saw an increase of just less than two percentage points. Proportions of London workplace population in areas of London, 2001 and 2011 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 34% 35% 43% 41% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 23% 24% 0% Central Rest of Inner Outer London 2001 2011 GLA Intelligence 3

Borough Workplace Populations Table 1 below shows the total number of usual residents working in each of the 33 London boroughs in 2011. The largest workplace population was in Westminster which had 579,700, or 13 per cent of all those working in the capital. The highest density of workers was in City of London which had 1,230.9 workers per hectare. This contrasts with Bromley which, with just 7.4 workers per hectare, had the lowest density in London. As would be expected Central London, as defined above, had the highest average density of workers of the three sub-regions with 199.8 workers per hectare. However, Outer London with its much greater area had more workers in total with 1,842,200. The map on page six clearly shows that employment density was focussed in the central area of London with a cluster of spikes in density visible in the City of London and Westminster. The area of high density to the east of the central area is Canary Wharf. Also visible are areas of higher density throughout Outer London. These are town centres where office and retail space are focussed and so worker densities are higher. Canary Wharf In 2011 the census reports that 75,300 usual residents were working in Canary Wharf. This figure accounted for 32 per cent of all usual residents working in the borough of Tower Hamlets. Over 46,500 of Canary Wharf workers (62 per cent) were employed in Financial and Insurance activities; as a proportion of all people working in that industry in London in 2011 Canary Wharf accounted for 11 per cent. City of London According to the census in 2011 there were 356,700 usual residents employed in the City of London. A total of 75,100 or 39 per cent of these were engaged in the Financial and Insurance industry. These workers accounted for 18 per cent of all those in London working in this industry. GLA Intelligence 4

Table 1: Borough workplace populations and densities, 2011 Number of WPZ Workplace Population Workplace Population Rank Density (workers per ha) Density Rank City of London 349 356,700 2 1230.9 1 Barking and Dagenham 114 58,400 33 16.2 23 Barnet 286 129,100 10 14.9 24 Bexley 160 74,700 29 12.3 31 Brent 221 115,200 16 26.6 14 Bromley 245 111,400 17 7.4 33 Camden 497 272,400 3 125 3 Croydon 265 120,400 13 13.9 28 Ealing 262 132,500 9 23.9 15 Enfield 222 105,500 18 13.1 30 Greenwich 172 86,200 21 18.2 21 Hackney 224 103,600 20 54.3 9 Hammersmith and Fulham 201 124,500 12 75.9 7 Haringey 175 81,000 23 27.4 13 Harrow 162 73,800 30 14.6 25 Havering 174 84,700 22 7.5 32 Hillingdon 260 165,000 7 14.3 26 Hounslow 208 128,900 11 23 16 Islington 308 167,200 6 112.5 5 Kensington and Chelsea 249 116,500 15 96.1 6 Kingston upon Thames 141 72,500 31 19.5 20 Lambeth 231 137,700 8 51.3 10 Lewisham 168 78,900 25 22.4 17 Merton 159 75,200 28 20 19 Newham 181 103,900 19 28.7 12 Redbridge 171 78,900 26 14 27 Richmond upon Thames 191 78,400 27 13.7 29 Southwark 286 183,500 5 63.6 8 Sutton 141 72,300 32 16.5 22 Tower Hamlets 251 234,700 4 118.7 4 Waltham Forest 154 79,200 24 20.4 18 Wandsworth 251 117,900 14 34.4 11 Westminster 1,075 579,700 1 269.9 2 Central London 2,421 1,560,100 199.8 Rest of Inner London 2,025 1,098,200 45.5 Outer London 3,708 1,842,200 14.7 London 8,154 4,500,500 28.6 GLA Intelligence 5

Map: Density of workers per hectare (ha) for Workplace Zones in London, 2011 Density 0-483 484-1595 1596-3913 3914-10043 10044-34487 GLA Intelligence 6

Town Centres The Mayor s strategic planning document, the London Plan, identifies 198 town centres across the capital. They range from the smaller District Centres through to Major Centres, Metropolitan Centres and International Centres. Table 2: Metropolitan & International Centres, 2011 Name Type Borough Workplace Population Knightsbridge International Centre Kensington & Chelsea 7,700 Westminster West End International Centre Westminster 105,300 Bromley Metropolitan Town Centre Bromley 14,500 Croydon Metropolitan Town Centre Croydon 20,000 Ealing Metropolitan Town Centre Ealing 8,600 Harrow Metropolitan Town Centre Harrow 6,800 Hounslow Metropolitan Town Centre Hounslow 5,800 Ilford Metropolitan Town Centre Redbridge 7,800 Kingston Metropolitan Town Centre Kingston upon Thames 15,100 Romford Metropolitan Town Centre Havering 12,100 Shepherds Bush Metropolitan Town Centre Hammersmith & Fulham 6,200 Sutton Metropolitan Town Centre Sutton 10,300 Uxbridge Metropolitan Town Centre Hillingdon 9,800 Wood Green Metropolitan Town Centre Haringey 3,300 Source: London Plan, 2011 Census The table above shows the workplace populations of London s 12 Metropolitan Centres and two International Centres. Together these areas had 233,200 workers in 2011 accounting for five per cent of London s total working population. Table 3 below details the town centre working populations of each London borough and shows what proportion of the borough s total working population worked in the town centre area. The table includes Major, Metropolitan and International centres only. Edgware Town Centre is split between Barnet and Harrow. Knightsbridge International Centre is split between Kensington & Chelsea and Westminster. Kilburn Town Centre is split between Brent and Camden and therefore also between Central and Outer London. See the methodology note at the end of this document for an explanation of how this was done. GLA Intelligence 7

Table 3: Town centre workplace populations by borough, 2011 Workplace Population of centres Proportion of Borough total working in centres Number of Borough Centres City of London 0 0 0% Barking and Dagenham 1 4,780 8% Barnet 0.5 2,230 2% Bexley 1 4,327 6% Brent 1.5 3,184 3% Bromley 2 17,149 15% Camden 1.5 5,859 2% Croydon 1 20,030 17% Ealing 2 10,614 8% Enfield 1 3,470 3% Greenwich 2 10,281 12% Hackney 1 2,012 2% Hammersmith and Fulham 3 20,615 17% Haringey 1 3,255 4% Harrow 1.5 6,945 9% Havering 1 12,083 14% Hillingdon 1 9,753 6% Hounslow 2 9,555 7% Islington 2 9,587 6% Kensington and Chelsea 2.5 16,078 14% Kingston upon Thames 1 15,126 21% Lambeth 2 6,243 5% Lewisham 2 4,576 6% Merton 1 7,217 10% Newham 2 6,546 6% Redbridge 1 7,757 10% Richmond upon Thames 1 5,841 7% Southwark 1 2,928 2% Sutton 1 10,319 14% Tower Hamlets 1 75,319 32% Waltham Forest 1 2,933 4% Wandsworth 4 11,452 10% Westminster 2.5 107,292 19% Central 7.5 204,548 13% Rest of Inner 18 67,214 6% Outer 23.5 163,593 9% London 49 435,356 10% Source: London Plan, 2011 Census GLA Intelligence 8

Workplace population statistics include a range of data on characteristics of the working population. The analysis below focuses on distance travelled to work, method of travel to work and hours worked. Comparisons are made between London and England & Wales, London over time, and between Central, the Rest of Inner, and Outer London. Distance travelled to work Distance is calculated as the straight line distance between the resident s home and work postcodes. A distance travelled of 0.1km was taken to indicate that the person worked from home. Distance travelled to work was separated into eight distance sub-categories ranging from less than 2km up to 60km and over, as well as Working mainly from home and No fixed place of work. London, 2011 Almost three in ten (27 per cent or 1.2 million) of the workplace population of London travelled less than 5km in 2011. This was the most common distance travelled to work. Just over one fifth (21 per cent or 934,300) travelled between 5km and less than 10km, and just under one fifth (18 per cent or 829,700) travelled between 10km and less than 20km. The least common distance travelled was 20km and over, which accounted for 16 per cent (741,479) of the workplace population. Distance travelled to work, workplace population in London, 2011 No fixed place of work Works mainly at or from home 20 km and over 10 km to less than 20 km 5 km to less than 10 km Less than 5 km 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 GLA Intelligence 9

London and England & Wales, 2011 People working in London were more likely to have further to travel than the England & Wales average. Just over one quarter (27 per cent) of those working in London travelled less than 5km to work; over a seven percentage point smaller share than the England & Wales average. Bar the less than 5km category, London held three percentage point higher shares than England & Wales in all three remaining distance groups. In England & Wales ten per cent of people worked from home. In London the proportion was two percentage points lower at nine per cent. Distance travelled to work, London and England & Wales percentages, 2011 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Less than 5 km 5 km to less than 10 km 10 km to less than 20 km 20 km and over Works mainly at or from home No fixed place of work London England & Wales GLA Intelligence 10

The intercensal period, 2001 and 2011 The proportion of the workplace population of London with no fixed place of work almost doubled over the decade. This group represented just under five per cent of the total workplace population in 2001 (174,700), however in 2011 it held over a nine per cent share (418,900). The share of the London workplace population working mainly at or from home stayed the same throughout the intercensal period, at eight per cent. Fewer people had a less than 5km commute to work in 2011 (27 per cent) than was the case in 2001 (30 per cent). Distance travelled, London, 2001 and 2011 No fixed place of work Works mainly at or from home 20 km and over 10 km to less than 20 km 5 km to less than 10 km Less than 5 km 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 2011 2001 GLA Intelligence 11

Areas of London The proportion of the workplace population in Central London travelling less than 5km to work was nine percentage points below the London average, at 18 per cent, and 15 percentage points smaller than the same for Outer London (33 per cent). One in four (25 per cent) of all people working in Central London had a commute of 20 km and over, compared to one in seven (14 per cent) in the Rest of Inner London, and just over one in ten (11 per cent) in Outer London. The share of people working mainly at or from home in Outer London was three times that of those working in Central London (12 per cent compared with four per cent respectively). Just two per cent of the workplace population of Central London had no fixed place of work, compared to the London average of nine per cent and the Outer London figure of 14 per cent. Distanced travelled by areas in London, 2011 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Less than 5 km 5 km to less than 10 km 10 km to less than 20 km 20 km and over Works mainly at or from home No fixed place of work Central Rest of Inner Outer London GLA Intelligence 12

Method of travel to work The analysis below looks at the method of travel used by the workplace population of England & Wales, London and areas of London to get to work. Other method of travel to work includes taxi, motorcycle, scooter or moped, and any other method. London, 2011 The most common way to get to work in London in 2011 was driving a car or van. 1.2 million people used this method, which accounted for 27 per cent of the total workplace population. One in five (896,500) people used the underground, metro, light rail or tram to get to work. A similar proportion (828,300) got the train to work, at 18 per cent. Twice the proportion of people working in London walked to work (seven per cent or 330,400) than rode a bicycle (four per cent or 158,600). Method of travel, workplace population in London, 2011 All other methods of travel to work On foot Bicycle Passenger in a car of van Driving a car or van Bus, minibus, coach Train Underground, metro, light rail, tram Works mainly at or from home 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,0001,000,0001,200,0001,400,000 GLA Intelligence 13

London and England & Wales, 2011 The proportion of people driving a car or van to work in England & Wales was double that of London (55 per cent and 27 per cent respectively). England & Wales also had twice the share of workers that were a passenger in a car or van (five per cent) over London (two per cent). Proportions of people working in London getting the underground, metro, light rail or tram, or train to work were around four times those of their counterparts in England & Wales. Just five per cent of people working in England & Wales took the train, compared with 18 per cent in London. Similarly, four per cent got the underground, metro, light rail or tram nationally, and this figure was 20 per cent in London. One in eight (12 per cent) people working in London got the bus, minibus or coach to work. This proportion was much lower in England & Wales, at just one in fourteen (seven per cent). Around the same proportion of people cycled to work in England & Wales (three per cent) as in London (four per cent). There were more people nationally walking to work (ten per cent) than in London (seven per cent). Method of travel, workplace population in London and England & Wales, 2011 All other methods of travel to work On foot Bicycle Passenger in a car of van Driving a car or van Bus, minibus, coach Train Underground, metro, light rail, tram Works mainly at or from home 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% England & Wales London GLA Intelligence 14

The intercensal period, 2001 and 2011 The share of the workplace population in London using the underground, metro, light rail or tram to get to work has increased by three percentage points over the intercensal period, from 17 per cent in 2001 to 20 per cent in 2011. Workers in London were seven percentage points less likely to drive a car or van to work in 2011 (27 per cent) than in 2001 (34 per cent). The proportion of the workplace population in London cycling to work has almost doubled over the decade, from 78,800 (two per cent) in 2001 to 158,600 (four per cent) in 2011. There was a two percentage point higher share of London workers getting the bus to work in 2011 (12 per cent or 542,600) than in 2001 (376,900). Method of travel, London, 2001 and 2011 All other methods of travel to work On foot Bicycle Passenger in a car of van Driving a car or van Bus, minibus, coach Train Underground, metro, light rail, tram Works mainly at or from home 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 2011 2001 GLA Intelligence 15

Areas of London, 2011 Two thirds of the workplace population of Central London either used the underground, metro, light rain or tram (34 per cent or 531,400) or the train (32 per cent or 493,500) to get to work in 2011. Central London had double the proportion of people using the train to get to work (32 per cent) than inner London (18 per cent), and over four times the share using the train in Outer London (seven per cent). Central and the Rest of Inner London both had over double the proportion of workers cycling to work (four and five percent respectively) than Outer London (two per cent). Almost half (46 per cent) of Outer London s workplace population drove a car or van to get to work. This was over twice the proportion using this method in the Rest of Inner London area. Those in Central London using this form of transport only accounted for eight per cent of the total workplace population there. Ten per cent (150,900) of workers in Central London used the bus to get to work in 2011. This figure was 15 per cent (160,600) for the Rest of Inner London, and 13 per cent (231,100) for Outer London. Method of travel by areas in London, 2011 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Central Rest of Inner Outer London GLA Intelligence 16

Hours worked The below section describes data on hours worked by the workplace population of England & Wales, London, and areas of London. Part-time includes persons working 30 hours or less and those working 16 to 30 hours, and full-time includes persons working 31 hours or more. London, 2011 Three quarters (76 per cent or 3.43 million) of the workplace population of London was full-time (31 hours or more) in 2011. Part-time, London workers were twice as likely to work 16 to 30 hours (67 per cent) than 15 hours or less (33 per cent). 17 per cent (755,400) ofpeople working in London worked over 49 hours in 2011. Hours Worked in London, 2011 17% 8% 16% 60% Part time: 15 hours or less Full time: 31 to 48 hours Part time: 16 to 30 hours Full time: 49 or more hours GLA Intelligence 17

London and England & Wales, 2011 London held a five percentage point higher share of full-time workers (76 per cent) than England & Wales (71 per cent). Of those that were full-time in England & Wales, 19 per cent worked 49 hours or more per week; a three percentage point smaller share than in London (22 per cent). Hours worked, London and England & Wales, 2011 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Part time: 15 hours or less Part time: 16 to 30 hours Full time: 31 to 48 hours Full time: 49 or more hours London England & Wales GLA Intelligence 18

The intercensal period, 2001 and 2011 There was a five percentage point decrease in full-time workers in London over the intercensal period. In 2001, 81 per cent (3.1 million) people working in London worked over 31 hours a week; this figure dropped to 76 per cent (3.43 million) in 2011. There were more workers in London working a 16 to 30 hour week in 2011 than in 2001 (16 per cent compared with 12 per cent respectively). The proportion of people in London working 15 hours or less increased over the decade, from six per cent (232,100) in 2001 to eight per cent (355,700) in 2011. Hours worked, London, 2001 and 2011 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Part time: 15 hours or less Part time: 16 to 30 hours Full time:total 2001 2011 GLA Intelligence 19

Areas of London, 2011 The proportion of part-time workers in Outer London was double that of Central London, 31 per cent compared with 14 per cent. The share in central was ten percentage points smaller than the average for London. Those working full-time in Central London were most likely of all three areas to work 49 hours and over per week, with over one quarter doing so in 2011 (26 per cent. Rest of Inner share was 20 per cent and outer 19 per cent). There was little difference between the share of part-time workers working 15 hours or less across the three areas. In all areas, around one third of all part-time workers were working these hours. Hours worked, Areas of London, 2011 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Central Rest of Inner Outer London Part time Full time GLA Intelligence 20

Average Distance Travelled Table 5: Average distance travelled to work, 2011 Location Total population Total distance (km) Average Distance (km) England & Wales 26,414,207 311,663,604 11.8 London 4,500,481 65,733,761 14.6 Central London 1,560,084 32,752,751 21.0 Rest of Inner London 1,098,160 14,283,492 13.0 Outer London 1,842,237 18,697,518 10.1 The average distance travelled to work by people working in London was almost three km more than for those working in England and Wales, at 14.6km compared with 11.8km respectively. On average, those working in Central London travelled twice the distance to work as those working in Outer London, with an average distance of 21.0km compared with 10.1 respectively. Average distance travelled, Areas in London, London and England & Wales, 2011 25.0 20.0 21.0 15.0 10.0 11.8 14.6 13.0 10.1 5.0 0.0 England & Wales London Central London Rest of inner London Outer London GLA Intelligence 21

Note on methodology In order to create data for Town Centres Workplace Zones have been split and merged. Where a zone is split the proportion of the area of the zone which sites within the Town Centre is used to apportion the working population of that zone to the centre. Proportions greater than 95 per cent were treated as 100 while those less than five were treated as zero. For more information please contact Census Information Scheme, GLA Intelligence Greater London Authority, City Hall, The Queen s Walk, More London, London SE1 2AA e-mail: census@londno.gov.uk GLA Intelligence 2 Copyright Greater London Authority, 2014