HOW NATS RESPONDED TO THE DAY OF TERROR

Similar documents
GENERAL REPORT. Reduced Lateral Separation Minima RLatSM Phase 2. RLatSM Phase 3

Modernising UK Airspace 2025 Vision for Airspace Tools and Procedures. Controller Pilot Symposium 24 October 2018

Community Impact: Focus on Barston

Any queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:

Community Impact: Focus on Knowle

Classification: Public. Night Flights and Quiet Night Charter update

Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport

GENERAL INFORMATION Aircraft #1 Aircraft #2

Phases of a departure

Olympics Managing Special Events Brendan Kelly, Head of Operational Policy

OCEANIC REQUIRED NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE (Including RNP-10 and RNP-4)

British Airways strike almost over

April 2011 Update- All things Aviation: If you d like additional information please contact the City. Noise 101

RLatSM. Reduced Lateral Separation Trial. FAQs. 4 September 15

FINAL REPORT BOEING B777, REGISTRATION 9V-SWH LOSS OF SEPARATION EVENT 3 JULY 2014

TRANSPONDER WITH IVAC

Aerospace Engineers. Toll-free: Tel:

SPEECH BY WILLIE WALSH, CHIEF EXECUTIVE, INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP. Annual General Meeting, Thursday June 14, Check against delivery

Leveraging on ATFM and A-CDM to optimise Changi Airport operations. Gan Heng General Manager, Airport Operations Changi Airport Group

Edinburgh Airport Limited Consultation: A Draft Response Template.

Space Based ADS-B. ICAO SAT meeting - June 2016 AIREON LLC PROPRIETARY INFORMATION

British Airways strike almost over

Airspace Structure Changes and ATC Operational Procedure Changes. Stuart Lindsey Airspace Regulation

SUMMARY. of the North. Reference: A B

NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES

Air Navigation Bureau ICAO Headquarters, Montreal

Operation of the UK Traffic Distribution Rules in relation to all-cargo services at London Gatwick Airport. Consultation paper by BAA Gatwick

Consultation on Draft Airports National Policy Statement: new runway capacity and infrastructure at airports in the South East of England

AIRCRAFT INCIDENT REPORT

Part 172 Air Traffic Service Organisations Certification, Amendment 2. Contents

AIRPROX REPORT No PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB

Arriving and departing aircraft at Edinburgh Airport

Jeff Poole Director, Airport & ATC Charges, Fuel and Taxation To represent, lead and serve the airline industry

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

Fewer air traffic delays in the summer of 2001

DOT 3-Hour Rule Master Plan

Temporary Radio Mandatory Zone

SAFETYSENSE LEAFLET 11 INTERCEPTION PROCEDURES

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR 33/17

Engine Failure in 30 seconds. Kenyan Hall Farm Airstrip Safety Document Update... KASDU

Date: 01 Aug 2016 Time: 1344Z Position: 5441N 00241W

BATA annual lecture speech 14 October And thank you to BATA for inviting me to give the first annual lecture.

U.S. India Aviation Cooperation Program. Air Traffic Management Training Program Update March 2009

Subject : Correct application of the strategic lateral offset procedures

Classification: Public AIRSPACE AND FUTURE OPERATIONS CONSULTATION (JANUARY-MARCH 2019)

ACCIDENT. Aircraft Type and Registration: Piper PA Cherokee, G-BRWO. No & Type of Engines: 1 Lycoming O-320-E3D piston engine

SAT/FIT/11 South American Office Eleventh Meeting of FANS 1/A Interoperability Team SAT/FIT/11

Executive Summary Introduction

Dave Allanby GM Operations SOUTH AFRICAN EXPRESS

THE AREA CONTROL CENTRE (CTR) POSITION

LAX Community Noise Roundtable. Aviation Noise News Update. January 14, 2015

EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY PLAN

Air Accident Investigation Unit Ireland

1.1 Definition Distress is defined as a condition of being threatened by serious and/or imminent danger and requiring immediate assistance.

Wake Turbulence Recategorization (RECAT) ATC Human Factors Issues During Implementation. Terminal Services

Advanced Safe Separation Technologies and Algorithms (ASSTAR) Project

CPA2 1256: ft V/2.8nm H

Flying in Canada and the North Atlantic

Ash cloud of April and May 2010: Impact on Air Traffic

US Airspace A History

LETTER OF AGREEMENT. Between. and RELATING TO

Chapter 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SID/STAR phraseology FAQ Canadian implementation April 27, 2017

FUTURE AIRSPACE CHANGE

REGIONAL CARIBBEAN CONTINGENCY PROCEDURES FOR HURRICANES

CLEARANCE INSTRUCTION READ BACK

CAA AIRSPACE CHANGE DECISION

SAFETYSENSE LEAFLET 11 -

helicopter? Fixed wing 4p58 HINDSIGHT SITUATIONAL EXAMPLE

Part 135 Recurrency (B)

Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions AIRE

Heathrow s Blueprint for noise reduction. Ten practical steps to cut noise in 2016/17

CAA stakeholder engagement Draft airspace modernisation strategy

FASI(N) IoM/Antrim Systemisation Airspace Change Decision

SECTION 4 - APPROACH CONTROL PROCEDURES

AIRSPACE STRUCTURE. In aeronautics, airspaces are the portion of the atmosphere controlled by a country above its territory.

2.6% /14 Forward Plan. 4.1 Traffic Outlook. Eurocontrol STATFOR s 2013 Medium-Term Forecast for 2015

Runway Crossings at Brisbane International Airport

Federal Aviation Administration DCA. By: Terry Biggio, Vice President Air Traffic Services Date: June 18, Federal Aviation Administration

North Atlantic Initiatives

The CAA Beacon at. The answer is NO they are NOT, and the reasons are set

CANSO Workshop on Operational Performance. LATCAR, 2016 John Gulding Manager, ATO Performance Analysis Federal Aviation Administration

Present: Dame Deirdre Hutton

The Economic Impact of Civil Aviation on the North Atlantic (NAT)

Pre-Coordination Runway Scheduling Limits Winter 2014

AIRSPACE INFRINGEMENTS BACKGROUND STATISTICS

What is an airspace change?

CLASS D CONTROLLED AIRSPACE GUIDE

Airway N601: Revision to Controlling Authority

Contents. Subpart A General 91.1 Purpose... 7

Effective Altitude. R-3103 To 30,000 (To 9,144 meters) Source: NACO 2002 Notes: 1 By NOTAM issued 12 hours in advance

RNP In Daily Operations

SERIOUS INCIDENT. Aircraft Type and Registration: Boeing 737-8F2, TC-JKF. No & Type of Engines: 2 CFM 56-7B22 turbofan engines

ASSEMBLY 39TH SESSION

International Civil Aviation Organization REVIEW OF STATE CONTINGENCY PLANNING REQUIREMENTS. (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY

DECISIONS ON AIR TRANSPORT LICENCES AND ROUTE LICENCES 4/99

FUEL MANAGEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT

Summary How air passengers and aviation businesses would be affected if the UK leaves the EU in March 2019 with no deal.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

NextGen Equipage Impact on Airlines and MROs April 16, 2013

Transcription:

HOW NATS RESPONDED TO THE DAY OF TERROR It was only a matter of minutes after the terrorist strikes on New York and Washington before NATS people were feeling the first effects of what would for them be a five-day emergency, drawing in staff at all levels from units nationwide. For when the US authorities responded to the outrage by closing the country s airspace the immediate result was nearly 200 westbound aircraft seeking alternative destinations. Oceanic controllers had to contact each one and revise its flight plan. Many aircraft turned back. Meanwhile, other NATS people were dealing with the next phase of the emergency, the government s ban on flying over London. Heathrow arrivals procedures had to be swiftly and safely changed and London City Airport was closed. The response to the crisis was fully in line with NATS finest traditions with staff volunteering to work beyond their shifts or forego rest days. Transport Secretary Stephen Byers praised their speed, efficiency and professionalism. And chief executive Richard Everett chose just one word to describe it: magnificent. At Oceanic control Y Watch was on duty at the time and its members will probably never forget what happened next. For, as Keith Richardson, manager ATC Ocean at the Scottish and Oceanic Area Control Centre (ScOACC), Prestwick, puts it: the tragic events in the USA had an almost immediate impact upon Shanwick operations. In fact it was at 1442 BST, just 57 minutes after the first hi-jacked aircraft had slammed into the World Trade Centre, that the New York centre told ScOACC that US airspace was closed. For NATS it could hardly have happened at a worse time. There were 197 aircraft crossing, or cleared to cross, the north Atlantic westbound. At that stage we were confronted with a situation that we had never been confronted with before, says NATS operations director Keith Williams. It was the worst scenario we could possibly think of. In that first hour the north Atlantic region experienced its worst ever disruption with some 40-plus aircraft executing mid-ocean turn-backs, reports Keith Richardson. A similar number of aircraft returned or diverted before they reached the Shanwick area. This left the bulk of westbound traffic making for Canadian airports. By the evening Halifax, Nova Scotia, was reporting 43 large aircraft parked on its runway with similar numbers at Gander and other maritime airports. Traffic also diverted to Iceland and Bermuda.

But before aircraft could land safely oceanic controllers had to arrange conflictfree clearances for them while dealing with multiple requests for return. They also had to handle four declared emergencies and a Mayday call, although this was later downgraded. Many pilots adopted standard contingency procedures by turning off-track, or climbing or descending to intermediate levels while awaiting ATC clearances. Says Keith Richardson: Controllers were stretched to the limit passing traffic information, finding conflict-free paths, descending returning flights and handling massive amounts of co-ordination. The brunt of this increased workload was borne by Steve Toal and Y Watch although senior managers took some of the pressure off them by establishing a communications cell. A number of non-operations staff offered help and so did people on leave. Three controllers living locally gave up their days off while others stayed beyond the end of their shifts. Says Keith Richardson: Support staff were magnificent and played an important role in the operation, as did our system engineers. The switchboard was also busier and canteen staff stayed on to supply much-needed refreshment. Next day the centre handled just 107 transatlantic crossings about ten per cent of its normal workload. But it was the day after that which Keith Richardson describes as very challenging because of confusion about the status of US airspace and the flights that were allowed to enter it. Several from Europe were turned back after another US ground-stop was imposed and it was not until late the following day that UK airlines were allowed back. Meanwhile the effects of the emergency were also being felt in London. During the afternoon of 11 September NATS was warned about the Government s intention to ban low-level flying over the capital. Taking advice from senior controllers, Colin Chisholm together with Keith Williams and his team worked with officials of the Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions to draw up plans for maintaining operations at Heathrow despite the overflying ban. Keith Williams explains: We couldn t feed in the Heathrow traffic as normal over London because we had to bring it all the way round the back and in from the south. To test the new procedure short operational trials were run to see if there were any things we hadn t thought of. But Keith Williams reports: We were content that it was safe, so we introduced it. It fact it was at 1900 BST that the CAA, acting on the government s instructions, clamped the exclusion zone over London. It was six miles long by four miles wide and extended from Canary Wharf in the east to Kensington Palace in the west. It reached up to 6,000 feet. Only police and medical emergency helicopters were allowed to fly within the zone.

Even that was not the limit of NATS problems that day, as Keith Williams explains: We knew there was some bad weather coming up and we were concerned that we weren t able to use our normal procedures. But in the end it worked. Actually, Heathrow s normal landing rate only fell by 10 cent and delays peaked at 45 minutes. There was some good luck, though. Steve James, general manager, air traffic services at Heathrow says: Recently Heathrow Airport Ltd has been resurfacing the northern runway and replacing the instrument landing system so we ve not had to alternate the landing runway in the middle of the afternoon as we normally do. That helped a lot. It meant that the holding area for Runway 27 Left could be used for emergency aircraft parking. At one time we had 20 large aircraft sitting there and on other remote parts of the manoeuvring area, Steve James recalls. He s also full of praise for his staff. Thanks to their professionalism we were prepared for the return of the North American flights and really didn t experience any bad delays. Terminal Control at West Drayton did a fine job as well. Another affect of the central London flying ban was the closure of London City Airport from Tuesday evening until Friday morning. Paul Reid, the airport s manager air traffic services, reports that during this time NATS staff, both there and at Thames Radar, worked extremely hard to design and seek approval for a temporary departure route to permit the resumption of operations. This meant that aircraft were required to turn north east immediately after departure to ensure clearance from the exclusion zone. Normal operations were not resumed until Sunday. Says Paul Reid: The whole team deserves a lot of credit including the CAA s Directorate of Airspace Policy. This hard work undoubtedly allowed the airport to open earlier than it would otherwise have been able to. Transport Secretary Stephen Byers praised the professionalism of NATS staff in the aftermath of the attacks and the London airspace restrictions. In a letter to chief executive Richard Everitt he says: I and my colleagues are aware that these measures are disruptive and require a great deal of extra effort by a large number of people. I have been impressed by the speed, efficiency and professionalism with which the industry has responded to these additional demands. Richard Everitt believes NATS responded magnificently. He says: Staff dealt effectively and sympathetically with returning flights on which passengers and crews were clearly distressed. Many staff stayed on duty to help and many more `phoned in to offer assistance.

A week after the attack the crisis moved into a new phase as the industry began counting the cost in terms of lost business. Many airlines announced job cuts slashing fleets and route networks (see page 5). In response to the downturn in the aviation industry, NATS has had to accelerate its planned reduction in the numbers of management and support staff.

IN A Box How Airlines and Airports Coped Less than 30 minutes after the terrorist attack British Airways top management and key operations staff were meeting in the airline s war room under the chairmanship of chief executive Rod Eddington to determine their response to the crisis. BA normally flies 36 services a day to the USA and 22 were in the air at the time of the attacks. All had to be diverted although some were able to return to the UK and Ireland. Most landed in Canada where small airports were suddenly overwhelmed by the arrival of large numbers of passengers all needing food and shelter. But the aircraft could not leave for two days as Canadian stayed closed. The shortage of beds meant that two flight crews had to spend their nights in a local jail. By the week-end, though, the aircraft and their crews had been retrieved and repositioned. Rod Eddington declared it had been the harshest week of my entire career. Virgin Atlantic counted itself fortunate to have only four flights diverted with the rest able to return to the UK. But spokesman Paul Moore describes as confusing to say the least the conflicting messages from the Federal Aviation Administration about new security requirements and the status of US airspace. The airline established a control team of key people which met three times a day during the crisis to assess the developing situation and take decisions. Airport operator BAA had the additional headache of new security requirements and in the early stages of the crisis office staff at Heathrow were drafted in to help. Regular meetings involving key airport staff and NATS representatives were also held.

IN A Box CRISIS CHRONOLOGY (All times BST) 11 September 1345 American Airlines Flight 11crashes into World Trade Centre s north tower 11 September 1405 United Airlines Flight 175 crashes into south tower 11 September 1442 FAA tells NATS US airspace is closed; 197 flights in Shanwick oceanic airspace heading west or have clearance to enter 11 September 1900 CAA imposes airspace restrictions on government instructions; London City Airport closed 12 September NATS controllers handle 107 transatlantic crossings, nearly 90% down on normal 13 September US airspace re-opens but only to US-owned aircraft, causing confusion with five UK-originating aircraft turned back by another temporary US-imposed ground stop 14 September London City resumes operations 14 September US airspace opens but availability of individual US airports depends on compliance with revised security measures; UK airlines not told they can re-enter US airspace until 2215