REPORT. Pavement Evaluation Summary Brookshire Way & Duluth Park Gwinnett County Duluth, Georgia. Project Number

Similar documents
FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION (FDR)

FHWA ALF Update & Performance Testing. Nelson Gibson Spring 2016 ETG Salt Lake City, UT

A. CONCLUSIONS OF THE FGEIS

Pavement Strength Analysis Prepared by Molzen Corbin September 2016

Chapter 14. Design of Flexible Airport Pavements AC 150/5320-6D

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Coral Springs Charter High School and Middle School Job No Page 2

Reuse of RAP in asphalt pavements. RAP = Recycled Asphalt Pavement also called millings or grindings from:

LUDWIG RD. SUBDIVISION PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

MEMORANDUM. Lynn Hayes LSA Associates, Inc.

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

FHWA P/N Guidelines. Corridor Relationship. Highway 22 Segment 1 - US 169 to CSAH 2 Relevance / Documentation of Need

Transportation System Preservation R & D Needs Statements


2006 WEEKDAY TRAFFIC PROFILE. June 15, 2007

EXISTING CONDITIONS A. INTRODUCTION. Route 107 Corridor Study Report

Florida Registration No Florida Registration No

PUBLIC NOTICE. Table 1 Projects Proposed by Amendment

PennDOT Interstate Work next week March 30-April 3:

MEMORANDUM. Bob Zagozda, Chief Financial Officer Westside Community Schools. Mark Meisinger, PE, PTOE Felsburg Holt & Ullevig. DATE: June 11, 2018

Passenger Facility Charge Application #1

PROGRESS PARK CONNECTOR

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

FINAL TERMINAL TRAFFIC MONITORING STUDY

TENDER NO. T WESTDALE ROAD SANITARY SEWER UPGRADE ADDENDUM NO. 1

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

Watts St westbound thru

Section 106 Update Memo #1 Attachment D. Traffic Diversion & APE Expansion Methodology & Maps

TECHNICAL PAPER

PAVEMENT CONDITION REPORT

FEASIBILITY STUDY REFINED CONCEPT 1 PROJECT A

Boeing Aircraft and the Impact on Airports

NORTH FRASER PERIMETER ROAD WEST CORRIDOR DEFINITION STUDY

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

Lake Erie Commerce Center Traffic Analysis

LOST HILLS ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION UPDATE. CALABASAS CITY COUNCIL April 26, 2017

City of Tallahassee, FL Department of Aviation

Central Coast Origin-Destination Survey

CITY OF IMPERIAL TOTAL BID PROPOSAL. 1. Mobilization / Bonds / Insurances LS 1 $ $ 2. Preparation/Implementation Traffic Control Plan LS 1 $ $

MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT. Civil Environmental Engineering Division

TRAFFIC ALERT FOR JANUARY 15-19, 2018 Highway Work Zones in the Staunton District

PURPOSE AND NEED (CONCURRENCE POINT 1) NEW CANADA ROAD PROJECT FROM STATE ROUTE 1 (U.S. HIGHWAY 70) TO U.S. INTERSTATE 40

Punta Gorda Airport Master Plan Update

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT


APPENDIX H MILESTONE 2 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS OF THE AT-GRADE CROSSINGS

CONTACT: Nichole Lawrence CELL: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Wednesday March 28, 2018

Appendix B PAVEMENT CONDITION AND HISTORY

MEMORANDUM. Open Section Background. I-66 Open Section Study Area. VDOT Northern Virginia District. I-66 Project Team. Date: November 5, 2015

ROUTE 122 CORRIDOR STUDY ---- Bedford County and Bedford City, Virginia

Proposed Bicycle Lanes on Yonge Street from Queens Quay to Front Street

2008 DEKALB COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN (UPDATE)

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

12, 14 and 16 York Street - Amendments to Section 16 Agreement and Road Closure Authorization

Evaluation of High-Occupancy-Vehicle

Airworthiness Directive

Mercer SCOOT Adaptive Signal Control. Karl Typolt, Transpo Group PSRC RTOC July 6th, 2017

TRAFFIC ALERT FOR DECEMBER 25, 2017 to JANUARY 5, 2018 Highway Work Zones in the Staunton District

B GEORGIA INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD AVIATION RECOMMENDATIONS DEFINITION OF THE ISSUE. Plan and Fund for the Future:

VDOT HOT SPOTS IN THE FREDERICKSBURG DISTRICT

Vista Field Airport. Master Plan Update. February, Prepared for: Port of Kennewick One Clover Island Kennewick, Washington

Treasure Island Supplemental Information Report Addendum

Section 3-04 Cross Sectional Elements TABLE OF CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION...3 General...3 Exhibit 1-Cross-Sectional Elements...3

- Countywide - Roadway Cone Zone / Lane Closure / Sidewalk Repair Schedule

Project Purpose: Project History and Status:

MONTANA CONSTRUCTION REPORT 06 / 14 / 2016

Mr. Michael Malone CPS Energy 145 Navarro Street San Antonio, Texas Project No

Freymond Aggregates Quarry Bay Lake Rd., Twp. of Faraday

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT RE-EVALUATION

PUBLIC NOTICE FOR PROPOSED COLLECTION OF PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES AT COLORADO SPRINGS AIRPORT

November 21, 2012 Barbara Kelleher, (954)

ADVANCED WARNING SYSTEM FOR SHARED USE CROSSING ON HOWARD STREET EAST OF NORDICA AVENUE

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

Pavement Management Study

Wicking Geosynthetic Used for Frost Heave Prevention Pioneer Mountain Scenic Byway

Mainline Description

SELF RE-ERECTING MARKER POSTS

Field Investigation: Evaluation of Non-Destructive Density Testing Devices on Hot Mix Asphalt. December 14, By:

PRIORITIES COMMITTEE MEETING

1.2 Corridor History and Current Characteristics

Spencer Environmental Appendix A: Alternative Analysis for Construction Access Route

General Relativity of Pavement Condition Rating and Its Global Impact

Washington St. & Ash Coulee Dr./43 rd Ave Intersection Study

VDOT HOT SPOTS IN THE FREDERICKSBURG DISTRICT

Typical avalanche problems

Exit 148 (Quantico) to Exit 133 (Route 17/Fredericksburg)

FINAL. Bicycle/Pedestrian Feasibility Study City of DeBary Dirksen Drive Trail. Prepared For: Volusia County MPO

Pavement Management Report 2012 Status Report

DD FORM 3009, FEB 2016 REPLACES DA FORM 1247, WHICH IS OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 6 Pages Adobe Professional X

Grove Field Airport Environmental Assessment

TRAFFIC ALERT FOR MARCH 5-9, 2018 Highway Work Zones in the Staunton District

Construction Staging Adelaide Street West

A. From I-68 in Monongalia County, West Virginia to SR 6119 in Fayette County, Pennsylvania 1

Bearing Strength Assessment PLR & PCN

2017 APC/PennDOT Fall Seminar. Deputy Secretary for Highway Administration George W. McAuley Jr., P.E.

WMA A Contractors Experience. NAPA 56 th Annual Meeting February 5-9, 2011 Orlando, FL. Tony Limas Granite Construction Company

C. APPROACH FOR IDENTIFYING THE BEST ROUTES FOR THE NEEDED TRANSMISSION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS

Transcription:

REPORT Pavement Evaluation Summary Brookshire Way & Duluth Park Duluth, Georgia Project Number 2013.4154.01 February 11, 2014 Revised March 20, 2014 UNITED CONSULTING 625 Holcomb Bridge Road Norcross, GA 30071 (770) 209-0029 www.unitedconsulting.com

Brookshire Way and Duluth Park PAVEMENT EVALUATION SUMMARY For Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Duluth,, Georgia 1. LOCATION / DESCRIPTION These projects are for the roadway improvement and widening of Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Lane in Duluth,, Georgia. The projects are located within the Duluth city limits. For purposes of this report, Brookshire Way will be considered a north-south oriented roadway, and Duluth Park Lane will be considered an east-west oriented roadway. Plans of projects with Station numbers along the roadways were not provided. For the purpose of these evaluations, the start of each projects were considered as Station 10+00 by us. The stationing for Duluth Park Lane increases towards the east whereas for Brookshire Way increases towards the north. The evaluated portion of each alignment is located within the following approximate station limits: Station to Station Location 10+00± to 49+77± Brookshire Way 10+00± to 23+21± Duluth Park Lane 2. PAVEMENT CONDITION SUMMARY Brookshire Way (Sta. 10+00 to 49+77±) The existing pavement for Brookshire Way is mostly in poor condition based on our findings of our field evaluation. The pavement distress and core conditions are summarized in section 6 and section 7 of this report. Based on our opinion, the existing pavement should be reconstructed full depth. Duluth Park Lane (Sta. 10+00 to 23+21) The existing pavement for Duluth Park Lane is mostly in fair to poor condition based on our field evaluation. Two of the cores taken from this road were in good condition. The core taken from Station 17+64 was in poor condition. The core taken from the distressed area at Station 11+68 had Level 2 block cracking from the top of the core to a depth of about 1.38 inch, and the core from the distressed area at Station 17+64 had Level 3 block cracking extending vertically through the depth of the core, and it also had horizontal cracks at 1.0 inch from the top of the core and at 1.0 inch from the bottom of the core. Furthermore, the existing pavement does not have sufficient thickness for the anticipated traffic volume. Based on our opinion, the existing pavement should be constructed full depth. 2

Brookshire Way and Duluth Park The recommend Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) for this project consist of pulverizing the existing flexible pavement mixed with underlying GAB and soil to the recommended depths and adding emulsifying agent. For this project, we recommend addition of cement. The 28 day unconfined compressive strength of the FDR should be at least 300 psi. 3. PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY Location From Station To Station Recommendation Brookshire Way 10+00± 49+77± Full Depth Reconstruction/Replacement Duluth Park 10+00± 17+70± Full Depth Reconstruction/Replacement Lane 17+70± 23+21± Full Depth Reconstruction/Replacement 4. FULL-DEPTH RECLAMATION Full-Depth Reclamation, commonly referred as FDR is a pavement rehabilitation technique, where the existing asphalt along with underlying base materials are crushed and blended often with one or more stabilization materials such as cement, asphaltic emulsion, lime, foamed/expanded asphalt, etc., and even additional granular material prior to reusing the recycled blended materials as a stabilized base course. Several distinct advantages include: erasing deep pavement crack patterns reducing potential of reflective cracking, improved loadbearing characteristics, high fatigue resistance, shorter construction periods, in-situ recycling and substantially lower construction and future maintenance costs. FDR is typically performed 6 to 9 inches deep although it can be performed to depths exceeding 12 inches, if needed. Typically, a surface layer of asphalt is placed over stabilized base. Foamed asphalt is a mixture of aggregates (stone and soil) and foamed bitumen formed by mixing of hot bitumen and water. Hot asphalt cement is injected with cold water in a mixing chamber. Water immediately turns into steam and the trapped water inside tiny asphalt bubbles expand in volume ten times or more and lowers viscosity. In this state, when the foamed asphalt is mixed with recycled asphalt pavement and base, it provides a partial coating of larger aggregate and a superior coating of fine particles, thus creating a paste that holds the mix much better than asphalt emulsions. The contractor is typically responsible for mix design and foamed asphalt stabilization process and quality. Based on our analyses, we recommend the following minimum alternate section for FDR with foamed asphalt additives, if selected, on this project. We note that this section is based on our experience and engineering judgment on similar projects, published literature, research of foamed asphalt by a few states and universities, FHWA manual, project performance data on county roads and city streets used in similar climatic conditions for similar volume roads. The structural number used in our analyses for foamed asphalt are strictly based on the above research, engineering judgment and experience as no approved design methods are available with Georgia Department of Transportation. We reiterate that the contractor takes the responsibility of design, quality and providing performance warranty for this option. We 3

Brookshire Way and Duluth Park understand that the City of Duluth would like to use Foamed Asphalt because of their past experience and satisfaction on McClure Bridge Road project. Our recent conversation with similar specialty contractor indicated that currently it may be slightly expensive to choose FDR with Foamed Asphalt versus mixing Cement option. BROOKSHIRE WAY - FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION (FDR) (With Foamed Asphalt with Curb and Gutter) PAY ITEM NUMBER MATERIAL COURSE THICKNESS SPREAD RATE 402-3103 9.5 mm Type II Superpave Surface 1.25 inches 135 lbs/yd 2 402-3190 19 mm Superpave Binder 2.00 inches 220 lbs/yd 2 N/A Foamed Asphalt Stabilized Base Base 6.00 inches N/A DULUTH PARK LANE - FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION (FDR) (With Foamed Asphalt with Curb and Gutter) PAY ITEM NUMBER MATERIAL COURSE THICKNESS SPREAD RATE 402-3130 12.5 mm Superpave Surface 1.50 inches 165 lbs/yd 2 402-3190 19 mm Superpave Binder 2.50 inches 275 lbs/yd 2 N/A Foamed Asphalt Stabilized Base Base 10.00 inches N/A 5. FULL-DEPTH REPLACEMENT SECTIONS The following alternate full-depth pavement structures are recommended for use on these projects. BROOKSHIRE WAY FULL DEPTH CONSTRUCTION WITH GAB (With Curb and Gutter) PAY ITEM NUMBER MATERIAL COURSE THICKNESS SPREAD RATE 402-3103 9.5 mm Type II Superpave Surface 1.50 inches 165 lbs/yd 2 402-3190 19 mm Superpave Binder 2.00 inches 220 lbs/yd 2 310-1101 Graded Aggregate Base Base 8.00 inches N/A 4

Brookshire Way and Duluth Park DULUTH PARK LANE FULL DEPTH CONSTRUCTION WITH GAB (With Curb and Gutter) PAY ITEM NUMBER MATERIAL COURSE THICKNESS SPREAD RATE 402-3130 12.5 mm Superpave Surface 1.50 inches 165 lbs/yd 2 402-3190 19 mm Superpave Binder 2.00 inches 220 lbs/yd 2 402-3121 25 mm Superpave Asphalt Base 3.00 inches 330 lbs/yd 2 310-1101 Graded Aggregate Base Base 10.00 inches N/A 6. OVERLAY SECTIONS Over lay is not recommended for these projects. 7. PAVEMENT DISTRESSES Except for the following, no other significant distresses were encountered during the field exploration of these projects: Brookshire Way Load Cracking On Brookshire Way, predominantly Level 1 and Level 3 load cracking was observed, with some isolated areas of Level 2 and Level 4 load cracking Block/ Transverse Cracking Reflection Cracking On Brookshire Way, predominantly Level 1 and Level 3 block cracking was observed, and an area of with Level 2 block cracking was observed between Station 46+00± and 47+00± On Brookshire Way, no reflection cracking was observed on Brookshire Way. Raveling On Brookshire Way, raveling was not observed. Patches, Potholes, and Local Base Failures On Brookshire Way, Patches were noted from station 30+78± to 30+81± northbound, Lane 1, and from station 30+95± to 31+00± and station 45+90± to 46+60± southbound, Lane 1. Duluth Park Lane Load Cracking On Duluth Park Lane, mostly Level 1 load cracking was observed, with some isolated areas of Level 3 load cracking and Level 4 load cracking. 5

Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Block/Transverse Cracking Reflection Cracking On Duluth Park Lane, predominantly Level 1 and Level 2 block cracking was observed, and an isolated area of Level 3 block cracking was observed between Station 20+00 and 21+00. On Duluth Park Lane, Level 1 reflection cracking was observed at Station 21+30 Westbound Lane 1. Level 2 reflection cracking was observed from Station 16+00 to 16+20 Westbound, Lane 1. Raveling On Duluth Park Lane, raveling was not observed. Patches, Potholes, and Local Base Failures On Duluth Park Lane, a Patch and a local base failure were noted from station 20+60± to 20+65± eastbound, Lane 1 and westbound, Lane 1. 8. CORES Cores were recovered from six (6) locations on Brookshire Way and three (3) locations on Duluth Park Lane, using a 6-inch bit in the travel lanes of these projects to determine the thicknesses and condition of the existing pavement sections. The results of the coring operation are tabulated below: Core Number Location Station C-1 Brookshire Way C-2 Brookshire Way C-3 Brookshire Way C-4 Brookshire Way C-5 Brookshire Way C-6 Brookshire Way C-7 Duluth Park Lane C-8 Duluth Park Lane C-9 Duluth Park Lane Station 10+80± SB, Ln 1, 2 Lt, DW Station 14+40± NB, Ln 1, 10 Rt, PW Station 29+05± NB, Ln 1, 2 Rt, DW Station 32+38± SB, Ln 1, 9 Lt, PW Station 44+87± SB, Ln 1, 2 Lt, DW Station 48+17± NB, Ln 1, 10 Rt, PW Station 11+68 EB, Ln 1, 11 Rt, PW Station 17+64 WB, Ln 1, 6 Lt, DW Station 21+66 WB, Ln 1, 3 Lt, DW Core Length Core (inches) Condition 2.75 Fair, vertical cracking from surface to 2.75 Underlying Material 7.75 GAB 2.50 Good 6.75 GAB 2.50 Fair, vertical cracking from 6.50 GAB surface to 2.50 2.75 Good 5.25 GAB 3.50 Good 9.25 GAB 4.50 Good 4.50 GAB 4.75 Fair, vertical cracking from surface to 1.38 6 GAB 3.25 Poor, vertical cracking from 3 GAB surface to 3.25 and horizontal cracking at 1.00 and 2.25 4.50 Good 5.50 GAB 6

Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Notation: DW = Driver s Wheel Path GAB= Graded Aggregate Base Ln = Designated Travel Lane Lt = Left of the existing centerline, direction of travel (lower to higher station) Rt = Right of the existing centerline, direction of travel (lower to higher station) PW = Passengers Wheel Path NB = Northbound SB = Southbound EB = Eastbound WB = Westbound 9. OTHER INFORMATION The Soil Survey Summary has not been done for these projects. The attached pavement designs use the design value obtained from GDOT Pavement Design Manual Appendix G to complete this report. The full-depth replacement design analyses are attached to this report. All designs are based on Georgia Department of Transportation, Pavement Design Toll version 1.0. The traffic information provided below is based on the data provided by Mr. Adolfo Guzman via email dated January 30, 2014 and subsequently on February 4, 2014. Design Considerations for Brookshire Way o Number of lanes (in one-direction): 1 o Curb and gutter o TRAFFIC DATA A.D.T.(2014): 2,000 (Two-Way) A.D.T. (2034): 2,540 (Two- Way) Annual A.D.T. Rate of Increase = 1.2% Lane Distribution: 100/0 % 24 Hr. Trucks: 2% (SU=1%, MU=1%) Design Considerations for Duluth Park Lane o Number of lanes (in one-direction): 1 o Curb and gutter o TRAFFIC DATA A.D.T.(2014): 5,220 (Two-Way) A.D.T. (2034): 6,348 (Two-Way) Annual A.D.T. Rate of Increase = 1.2% Lane Distribution: 100/0 % 24 Hr. Trucks: 4% (SU=2%, MU=2%) 7

Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Soil Support: 2.5 (Appendix G- GDOT Pavement Design Manual) Regional Factor: 1.8 (Appendix H- GDOT Pavement Design Manual) Historical Information No additional historical information regarding previous pavement overlays, pavement management or construction dates were readily available for review for this project. 10. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS New pavements should be constructed flush with all existing and/ or new utility manholes or vaults. Full-Depth replacement/construction should be utilized on Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Lane. The provided pavement design is based on the traffic information provided by the client. No information regarding Mile Marker was available on the website or in our field observations. The station locations for Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Lane were not provided or staked in the field by a surveyor. United Consulting determined the approximate location of these stations by using a measuring wheel from the southern end of Brookshire Way and from the western end of Duluth Park Lane. 11. LIMITATIONS This report is for the exclusive use of the Clark Patterson Lee, its agents, and the designers of the project described herein, and may only be applied to this specific project. Our conclusions and recommendations have been prepared using generally accepted standards of Pavement Engineering practice in the State of Georgia and are valid for a period of two years from the completion of field work. Should the implementation of the recommendations presented in this report be delayed more than two years, re-evaluation of the pavement should be performed. No other warranty is expressed or implied. Our firm is not responsible for conclusions, opinions or recommendations of others. The right to rely upon this report and the data within may not be assigned without UNITED CONSULTING S written permission. Our preliminary conclusions and recommendations are based upon design information furnished to us, data obtained from the previously described exploration and testing program and our past experience. They do not reflect variations in the conditions that may be present intermediate of our corings and borings and in unexplored areas of the project. Should such variations become 8

Brookshire Way and Duluth Park apparent during construction, it will be necessary to re-evaluate our conclusions and recommendations based upon on-site observations of the conditions. Our conclusions and recommendations are based on our site reconnaissance, anticipated existing pavement thickness, and our past experience. UNITED CONSULTING Reported By: Lonnie Rucker Reviewed By: Mehdi Moazzami, Ph.D., P.E. QC Reviewed By: Santanu Sinharoy, P.E. Appendix A Figures Figure 1: Duluth Park Lane Project Location Map Figure 2: Duluth Park Lane/ Boring and Coring Location Plan Figure 3: Brookshire Way Project Location Map Figure 4: Brookshire Way/ Boring and Coring Location Plan Appendix B Roadway Photographs (19) 10 pages Appendix C Example Photographs (10) 5 pages Appendix D Core Photographs (13) 7 pages Appendix E Logs of borings (9) 9 pages Appendix F Pavement Design 6 pages Traffic Data Provided by Clarke Paterson Lee (2-pages) Brookshire Way - Full Depth Reclamation w/ Foamed Asphalt w/ C&G (1-page) Duluth Park - Full Depth Reclamation w/ Foamed Asphalt w/ C&G (1-page) Brookshire Way - Full Depth Construction w/ C&G (1-page) Duluth Park - Full Depth Construction w/ C&G (1-page) 9

APPENDIX A Figure 1 through Figure 4

APPENDIX B Roadway Photographs (10 Pages)

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/27/14 Brookshire Way Load Level 3 Block Crack Level 3 Brookshire Way at Station 11+00 Northbound, Lane 1, Facing Traffic, Block Cracking Level 3 and Load Cracking Level 3 Block Crack Level 3 Load Level 3 Brookshire Way at Station 16+00 Northbound, Lane 1, Facing Traffic, Block Cracking Level 3 and Load Cracking Level 3 Page 1 of 10 H:\GEOENVIR\REPORTS\2013\2013.4154.01 Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Photos\2013.4154.01 Roadway Photo's.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/27/14 Brookshire Way Load Level 3 Block Crack Level 2 Brookshire Way at Station 21+00 Southbound, Lane 1, With Traffic, Block Cracking Level 2 and Load Cracking Level 3 Block Crack Level 1 Load Level 3 Load Level 2 Brookshire Way at Station 26+00 Northbound, Lane 1, Facing Traffic, Block Cracking Level 1 and Load Cracking Level 2 to 3 Page 2 of 10 H:\GEOENVIR\REPORTS\2013\2013.4154.01 Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Photos\2013.4154.01 Roadway Photo's.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/27/14 Brookshire Way Block Crack Level 3 Block Crack Level 3 Brookshire Way at Station 26+00 Southbound, Lane 1, With Traffic, Block Cracking Level 3 Patching Load Level 1 Block Crack Level 3 Brookshire Way at Station 31+00 Northbound, Lane 1, Facing Traffic, Block Cracking Level 3 and Load Cracking Level 1 and Patching Page 3 of 10 H:\GEOENVIR\REPORTS\2013\2013.4154.01 Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Photos\2013.4154.01 Roadway Photo's.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/27/14 Brookshire Way Block Crack Level 3 Block Crack Level 1 Patching Brookshire Way at Station 31+00 Southbound, Lane 1, With Traffic, Block Cracking Level 1 and 3 and Patching Block Crack Level 3 Load Level 1 Brookshire Way at Station 36+00 Northbound, Lane 1, Facing Traffic, Block Cracking Level 3 and Load Cracking Level 1 Page 4 of 10 H:\GEOENVIR\REPORTS\2013\2013.4154.01 Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Photos\2013.4154.01 Roadway Photo's.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/27/14 Brookshire Way Possible Trench Excavation Load Level 3 Brookshire Way at Station 36+00 Northbound, Lane 1, With Traffic, Load Cracking Level 3 Load Level 1 Block Crack Level 1 Brookshire Way at Station 41+00 Northbound, Lane 1, Facing Traffic, Block Cracking Level 1 and Load Cracking Level 1 Page 5 of 10 H:\GEOENVIR\REPORTS\2013\2013.4154.01 Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Photos\2013.4154.01 Roadway Photo's.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/27/14 Brookshire Way Block Crack Level 2 Load Level 1 Load Level 3 Brookshire Way at Station 41+00 Southbound, Lane 1, With Traffic, Block Cracking Level 2 and Load Cracking Level 1 and 3 Block Crack Level 1 Brookshire Way at Station 46+00 Northbound, Lane 1, Facing Traffic, Block Cracking Level 1 Page 6 of 10 H:\GEOENVIR\REPORTS\2013\2013.4154.01 Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Photos\2013.4154.01 Roadway Photo's.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/27/14 Brookshire Way Block Crack Level 1 Patching Load Level 1 Brookshire Way at Station 46+00 Southbound, Lane 1, With Traffic, Block Cracking Level 1 and Load Cracking Level 1 and Patching Page 7 of 10 H:\GEOENVIR\REPORTS\2013\2013.4154.01 Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Photos\2013.4154.01 Roadway Photo's.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/27/14 Duluth Park Lane Load Level 1 Block Crack Level 1 Duluth Park Lane at Station 11+00 Eastbound, Lane 1, With Traffic, Block Cracking Level 1 and Load Cracking Level 1 Block Crack Level 2 Load Level 2 Duluth Park Lane at Station 11+00 Westbound, Lane 1, With Traffic, Block Cracking Level 2 and Load Cracking Level 2 Page 8 of 10 H:\GEOENVIR\REPORTS\2013\2013.4154.01 Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Photos\2013.4154.01 Roadway Photo's.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/27/14 Duluth Park Lane Load Level 1 Block Crack Level 1 Load Level 4 Duluth Park Lane at Station 16+00 Eastbound, Lane 1, Facing Traffic, Block Cracking Level 1 and Load Cracking Level 1 and 4 Load Level 1 Block Crack Level 1 Duluth Park Lane at Station 16+00 Westbound, Lane 1, With Traffic, Block Cracking Level 1 and Load Cracking Level 1 Page 9 of 10 H:\GEOENVIR\REPORTS\2013\2013.4154.01 Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Photos\2013.4154.01 Roadway Photo's.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/27/14 Duluth Park Lane Patching and Base Failure Block Crack Level 1 Duluth Park Lane at Station 21+00 Eastbound, Lane 1, Facing Traffic, Block Cracking Level 1 and Patching/Base Failure (Possible Utility Line) Patching Load Level 1 Duluth Park Lane at Station 21+00 Westbound, Lane 1, With Traffic, Load Cracking Level 1 and Patching Page 10 of 10 H:\GEOENVIR\REPORTS\2013\2013.4154.01 Brookshire Way and Duluth Park Photos\2013.4154.01 Roadway Photo's.doc

APPENDIX C Example Photographs (5 Pages)

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/10/14 Brookshire Way Typical Level 1 Load Cracking: Brookshire Way, Sta. 14+00, Eastbound, Lane 1, facing traffic Typical Level 2 Load Cracking: Brookshire Way, Sta. 24+40, Northbound, Lane 1, with traffic C 1 of 5 http://ucblade10/sites/geotechenv/8779/2013.4154.01/geotechnical Documents/Appendix C - Example Photos/2013.4154.01 Example Photos.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/10/14 Duluth Park Lane Typical Level 3 Load Cracking: Brookshire Way, Sta. 12+00, Northbound, Lane 1, facing traffic Typical Level 4 Load Cracking: Brookshire Way, Sta. 33+50, Southbound, Lane 1, with traffic C 2 of 5 http://ucblade10/sites/geotechenv/8779/2013.4154.01/geotechnical Documents/Appendix C - Example Photos/2013.4154.01 Example Photos.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/10/14 Duluth Park Lane Typical Level 1 Block Cracking: Brookshire Way, Sta. 32+60, Southbound, Lane 1 Typical Level 2 Block Cracking: Brookshire Way, Sta. 18+97, Southbound, Lane 1, with traffic C 3 of 5 http://ucblade10/sites/geotechenv/8779/2013.4154.01/geotechnical Documents/Appendix C - Example Photos/2013.4154.01 Example Photos.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/10/14 Duluth Park Lane Typical Level 3 Block Cracking: Brookshire Way, Sta. 48+75, Southbound, Lane 1, with traffic Typical Patching: Brookshire Way, Sta. 45+90 to 46+60, Southbound, Lane 1 C 4 of 5 http://ucblade10/sites/geotechenv/8779/2013.4154.01/geotechnical Documents/Appendix C - Example Photos/2013.4154.01 Example Photos.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/10/14 Duluth Park Lane Typical Level 1 Reflection Cracking: Duluth Park Lane, Station 21+00, Westbound, Lane 1, Facing Traffic Typical Level 2 Reflection Cracking: Duluth Park Lane, Station 16+00, Westbound, Lane 1, Facing Traffic C 5 of 5 http://ucblade10/sites/geotechenv/8779/2013.4154.01/geotechnical Documents/Appendix C - Example Photos/2013.4154.01 Example Photos.doc

APPENDIX D Core Photographs (7 pages)

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/22/14 Brookshire Way Core #1, Brookshire Way, Sta. 10+80±, Southbound, Lane 1, Driver Wheel Path Core #2, Brookshire Way, Sta. 14+40±, Northbound, Lane 1, Passenger Wheel Path D 1 of 7 http://ucblade10/sites/geotechenv/8779/2013.4154.01/geotechnical Documents/Appendix D - Core Photos/2013.4154.01-Core Photo's.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/22/14 Brookshire Way Core #3, Brookshire Way, Sta. 29+05±, Northbound, Lane 1, Driver Wheel Path Core #4, Brookshire Way, Sta. 32+38±, Southbound, Lane 1, Passenger Wheel Path D 2 of 7 http://ucblade10/sites/geotechenv/8779/2013.4154.01/geotechnical Documents/Appendix D - Core Photos/2013.4154.01-Core Photo's.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/22/14 Brookshire Way Core #5, Brookshire Way, Sta. 44+87±, Southbound, Lane 1, Driver Wheel Path Core #6, Brookshire Way, Sta. 48+17±, Northbound, Lane 1, Passenger Wheel Path D 3 of 7 http://ucblade10/sites/geotechenv/8779/2013.4154.01/geotechnical Documents/Appendix D - Core Photos/2013.4154.01-Core Photo's.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/22/14 Duluth Park Lane Core #7, Duluth Park Lane, Sta. 11+68±, Eastbound, Lane 1, Passenger Wheel Path Core #8, Duluth Park Lane, Sta. 17+64±, Westbound, Lane 1, Driver Wheel Path D 4 of 7 http://ucblade10/sites/geotechenv/8779/2013.4154.01/geotechnical Documents/Appendix D - Core Photos/2013.4154.01-Core Photo's.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/22/14 Duluth Park Lane Core #8, Duluth Park Lane, Sta. 17+64±, Westbound, Lane 1, Driver Wheel Path Core #8, Duluth Park Lane, Sta. 17+64±, Westbound, Lane 1, Driver Wheel Path D 5 of 7 http://ucblade10/sites/geotechenv/8779/2013.4154.01/geotechnical Documents/Appendix D - Core Photos/2013.4154.01-Core Photo's.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/22/14 Duluth Park Lane Core #8, Duluth Park Lane, Sta. 17+64±, Westbound, Lane 1, Driver Wheel Path Core #8, Duluth Park Lane, Sta. 17+64±, Westbound, Lane 1, Driver Wheel Path D 6 of 7 http://ucblade10/sites/geotechenv/8779/2013.4154.01/geotechnical Documents/Appendix D - Core Photos/2013.4154.01-Core Photo's.doc

UC # 2013.4154.01 Date: 1/22/14 Duluth Park Lane Core #9, Duluth Park Lane, Sta. 21+66±, Westbound, Lane 1, Driver Wheel Path D 7 of 7 http://ucblade10/sites/geotechenv/8779/2013.4154.01/geotechnical Documents/Appendix D - Core Photos/2013.4154.01-Core Photo's.doc

APPENDIX E Logs of Borings (9 pages)

APPENDIX F PAVEMENT DESIGN Traffic Data Provided by Clarke Patterson Lee (2 pages) Full Depth Reclamation for Brookshire Way (1 page) Full Depth Construction for Brookshire Way (1 page) Full Depth Reclamation for Duluth Park Lane (1 page) Full Depth Construction for Duluth Park Lane (1 page)

FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT DESIGN ANALYSIS Project: 2013.4154.01 PI No.: NA Description: Brookshire Way Traffic Data (NOTE: AADTs are one-way) 24-Hour Truck Percentage: 2.00% AADT Initial Year of Design Period: 1,000 AADT Final Year of Design Period: 1,270 Mean AADT (one-way): 1,135 Design Loading Mean AADT LDF Trucks 18-K ESAL Total Loadings 1,135 * 1.00 * 0.02 * 1.01 * 23 Total predicted design period loading = 22*365*20 = 167,900 Design Data Terminal Serviceability Index: 2.50 Soil Support: 2.50 Regional Factor: 1.80 PROPOSED FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT STRUCTURE Thickness Structural Structural Material Inches Coefficient Value 9.5 mm Superpave 1.25 0.44 0.55 19 mm Superpave 2.00 0.44 0.88 Foamed Asphalt Stabilized Base 8.00 0.25 2.00 Required SN = 3.49 Proposed SN = 3.43 >>>Proposed Pavement is 1.72% Under-designed <<< Remarks: Brookshire Way - Full Depth Reclamation w/ Foamed Asphalt w/ C&G Prepared By: UC 3/07/2014 Pavement Design Engineer Date Recommended By: Office Head Date Approved By: State Pavement Engineer Date F-3 of 6

FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT DESIGN ANALYSIS Project: 2013.4154.01 PI No.: NA Description: Duluth Park Lane Traffic Data (NOTE: AADTs are one-way) 24-Hour Truck Percentage: 2.00% AADT Initial Year of Design Period: 2,610 AADT Final Year of Design Period: 3,174 Mean AADT (one-way): 2,892 Design Loading Mean AADT LDF Trucks 18-K ESAL Total Loadings 2,892 * 1.00 * 0.04 * 0.96 * 111 Total predicted design period loading = 111*365*20 = 810,300 Design Data Terminal Serviceability Index: 2.50 Soil Support: 2.50 Regional Factor: 1.80 PROPOSED FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT STRUCTURE Thickness Structural Structural Material Inches Coefficient Value 12.5 mm Superpave 1.50 0.44 0.66 19 mm Superpave 2.50 0.44 1.10 Foamed Asphalt Stabilized 10.00 0.25 2.50 Base Required SN = 4.47 Proposed SN = 4.26 >>>Proposed Pavement is 4.70% Under-designed <<< Remarks: Full Depth Reclamation w/ Foamed Asphalt w/ C&G Prepared By: UC 3/07/2014 Pavement Design Engineer Date Recommended By: Office Head Date Approved By: State Pavement Engineer Date F-4 of 6

F- 5 of 6